Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-94fs2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-09T07:19:24.086Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

11 - The Linguistic Coding Differences Hypothesis (LCDH) and L2 Learning

A Thirty-Year Retrospective

from Part III - Innovative Perspectives and Paradigms

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 May 2023

By
Richard L. Sparks
Edited by
Zhisheng (Edward) Wen ,
Peter Skehan  and
Richard L. Sparks
Zhisheng (Edward) Wen
Affiliation:
Hong Kong Shue Yan University
Peter Skehan
Affiliation:
Institute of Education, University of London
Richard L. Sparks
Affiliation:
Mount St Joseph University
Get access

Summary

L2 acquisition is frequently contrasted with L1 acquisition on the basis of the relative difficulty of the former and its variability across learners. The variability in L2 is attributed to some combination of contextual factors, for example, classroom vs. immersion learning, additive vs. subtractive evaluation of L2, the typological distance between L1 and L2, and/or L2 aptitude. Historically, individual differences (IDs) in L1 ability have seldom been considered an explanatory factor in L2 learning. Instead, there has been an assumption that most individuals achieve full linguistic competence in L1. However, this view of L1 development is incorrect. Individual differences in L1 skills have been found to be large and stable across development. Since 1991, the Linguistic Coding Differences Hypothesis (LCDH) has maintained that the primary causal factors in L2 achievement are linguistic and posited a connection between IDs in L1 skills and IDs in L2 aptitude and L2 achievement. Studies over 30 years with U.S. L2 learners have consistently revealed strong relationships between IDs in L1 ability and L2 achievement. Further, there are long-term relationships between L1 ability and L2 aptitude/L2 achievement many years later. In this chapter, the author reviews the extensive evidence showing that IDs in L2 are moderated by IDs in L1 and that L1 and L2 have a common underlying foundation.

Keywords

Linguistic Coding Differences HypothesisL1 attainmentL2 aptitudecross-linguistic transferL2 reading
Type
Chapter
Information
Language Aptitude Theory and Practice , pp. 275 - 301
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2023

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Alderson, J. (1984). Reading in a foreign language: A reading problem or a language problem? In Alderson, J. & Urquhart, A. (eds.), Reading in a Foreign Language. London: Longman, pp. 1–24.Google Scholar
Cárdenas-Hagan, E., Carlson, C., & Pollard-Durodola, S. (2007). The cross-linguistic transfer of early literacy skills: The role of initial L1 and L2 skills and language of instruction. Language, Speech, and Hearing Services in Schools, 38, 249–257.Google Scholar
Carroll, J. (1963). A model of school learning. Teachers College Record, 64, 723–733.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carroll, J., & Sapon, S. (1959, 2000). Modern Language Aptitude Test (MLAT): Manual. San Antonio, TX: Psychological Corp. Republished by Second Language Testing, Inc. https://lltf.net/aptitude-tests/language-aptitude-tests/modern-language-aptitude-test-2/Google Scholar
Catts, H. (2018). The simple view of reading: Advancements and false impressions. Remedial and Special Education, 39(5), 317–323.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Catts, H., Adlof, S., & Weismer, S. (2006). Language deficits in poor comprehenders: A case for the simple view of reading. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 49, 278–293.Google Scholar
Chung, K., & Ho, C. (2010). Second language learning difficulties in Chinese children with dyslexia: What are the reading-related cognitive skills that contribute to English and Chinese word reading? Journal of Learning Disabilities, 43(3), 195–211.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Crombie, M. (1997). The effects of specific learning difficulties (dyslexia) on the learning of a foreign language in school. Dyslexia, 3, 27–47.Google Scholar
Cummins, J. (1979). Linguistic interdependence and the educational development of bilingual children. Review of Educational Research, 49(2), 222–251.Google Scholar
Dörnyei, Z., & Skehan, P. (2003). Individual differences in second language learning. In Doughty, C. & Long, M. (eds.), The Handbook of Second Language Acquisition. Malden, MA: Blackwell, pp. 589–630.Google Scholar
Droop, M., & Verhoeven, L. (2003). Language proficiency and reading ability in first- and second-language learners. Reading Research Quarterly, 38( 2), 78–103.Google Scholar
Dufva, M., & Voeten, M. (1999). Native language literacy and phonological memory as prerequisites for learning English as a foreign language. Applied Psycholinguistics, 20(3), 329–348.Google Scholar
Francis, D., Fletcher, J., Catts, H., & Tomblin, J. (2005). Dimensions affecting the assessment of reading comprehension. In Paris, S. & Stahl, S. (eds.), Children’s Reading Comprehension and Assessment. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum, pp. 369–394.Google Scholar
Gál, E., & Orbán, R. (2013). The relationship between the first language phonological awareness and the second language reading ability and the cross-language transfer of the first language phonological skills. Transylvanian Journal of Psychology, 14(2), 173–193.Google Scholar
Ganschow, L., & Sparks, R. (1996). Foreign language anxiety among high school women. Modern Language Journal, 80(2), 199–212.Google Scholar
Ganschow, L., & Sparks, R. (2001). Learning difficulties and foreign language instruction: A review of research and instruction. Language Teaching, 34(2), 79–98.Google Scholar
Ganschow, L., Sparks, R., Anderson, R., et al. (1994). Differences in anxiety and language performance among high, average, and low anxious college foreign language learners. Modern Language Journal, 78(1), 41–55.Google Scholar
Ganschow, L., Sparks, R., Javorsky, J., Pohlman, J., & Bishop-Marbury, A. (1991). Identifying native language difficulties among foreign language learners in college: A “foreign” language learning disability? Journal of Learning Disabilities, 24(9), 530–541.Google Scholar
Gardner, R. (1985). Social Psychology and Second Language Learning: The Role of Attitudes and Motivation. London: Arnold.Google Scholar
Genesee, F., Geva, E., Dressler, C., & Kamil, M. (2006). Synthesis: Cross-linguistic relationships. In August, D. & Shanahan, T. (eds.), Developing Literacy in Second-Language Learners: Report of the National Literacy Panel on Language-Minority Children and Youth. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum, pp. 153–174.Google Scholar
Geva, E., & Verhoeven, L. (2000). Introduction: The development of second language reading in primary children – Research issues and trends. Scientific Studies of Reading, 4(4), 261–266.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gkonou, C., Daubney, M., & Dawaele, J. (eds.) (2017). New Insights into Language Anxiety: Theory, Research, and Educational Implications. Blue Ridge Summit, PA: Multilingual Matters.Google Scholar
Gottardo, A., & Mueller, J. (2009). Are first- and second-language factors related in predicting second-language reading comprehension? A study of Spanish-speaking children acquiring English as a second language from first to second grade. Journal of Educational Psychology, 101(2), 330–344.Google Scholar
Gough, P., & Tunmer, W. (1986). Decoding, reading, and reading disability. Remedial and Special Education, 7(1), 6–10.Google Scholar
Hoover, W., & Gough, P. (1990). The simple view of reading. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 2(2), 127–160.Google Scholar
Hoover, W., & Tunmer, W. (2020). The Cognitive Foundations of Reading and its Acquisition: A Framework with Applications Connecting Teaching and Learning. Cham, CH: Springer.Google Scholar
Hoover, W., & Tunmer, W. (2021). The primacy of science in communicating advances in the science of reading. Reading Research Quarterly, 57(2), 399–408. https://doi.org/10.1002/rrq.446Google Scholar
Horwitz, E. (2010). Foreign and second language anxiety. Language Teaching, 43(2), 154–167.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Horwitz, E., Horwitz, M., & Cope, J. (1986). Foreign language classroom anxiety. Modern Language Journal, 70(2), 125–132.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hulstijn, J., & Bossers, B. (1992). Individual differences in L2 proficiency as a function of L1 proficiency. European Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 4(4), 341–353.Google Scholar
Humes-Bartlo, M. (1989). Variation in children’s ability to learn second languages. In Hyltenstam, K. & Obler, L. (eds.), Bilingualism across the Life Span. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press, pp. 41–54.Google Scholar
Kahn-Horwitz, J., Shimron, J., & Sparks, R. (2005). Predicting foreign language reading achievement in elementary school students. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 18(6), 527–558.Google Scholar
Kahn-Horwitz, J., Shimron, J., & Sparks, R. (2006). Weak and strong novice readers of English as a foreign language: Effects of first language and socioeconomic status. Annals of Dyslexia, 56(1), 161–185.Google Scholar
Kilpatrick, D. (2015). Essentials of Assessing, Preventing, and Overcoming Reading Difficulties. New York: Wiley & Sons.Google Scholar
Kim, Y. (2017). Why the Simple View of Reading is not simplistic: Unpacking component skills of reading using a direct and indirect model of reading (DIER). Scientific Studies of Reading, 21(4), 310–333.Google Scholar
Kohonen, V. (1995). Is the relation between phonological memory and foreign language learning accounted for by vocabulary acquisition? Applied Psycholinguistics, 16(2), 155–172.Google Scholar
MacIntyre, P., & Gardner, R. (1991). Methods and results in the study of anxiety and language learning: A review of the literature. Language Learning, 41(1), 85–117.Google Scholar
Mancilla-Martinez, J., & Lesaux, N. (2010). Predictors of reading comprehension for struggling readers: The case of Spanish-speaking language minority learners. Journal of Educational Psychology, 102(3), 701–711.Google Scholar
Melby‐Lervåg, M., & Lervåg, A. (2011). Cross‐linguistic transfer of oral language, decoding, phonological awareness and reading comprehension: A meta‐analysis of the correlational evidence. Journal of Research in Reading, 34(1), 114–135.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Oxford, R. (1990). Styles, strategies, and aptitude: Connections for language learning. In Parry, T. & Stansfield, C. (eds.), Language Aptitude Reconsidered. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall, pp. 67–125.Google Scholar
Papagno, C., Valentine, T., & Baddeley, A. (1991). Phonological short-term memory and foreign-language vocabulary learning. Journal of Memory and Language, 30(3), 331–347.Google Scholar
Petscher, Y., Cabell, S., Catts, H., et al. (2020). How the science of reading informs 21st‐century education. Reading Research Quarterly, 55, S267–S282.Google Scholar
Proctor, C., Carla, M., August, D., & Snow, C. (2005). Native Spanish-speaking children reading in English: Toward a model of comprehension. Journal of Educational Psychology, 97(2), 246–256.Google Scholar
Ranta, L. (2002). The role of the learner’s language analytic ability in the communicative classroom. In Robinson, P. (ed.), Individual Differences and Instructed Language Learning. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, pp. 159–180.Google Scholar
Safa, A. (2018). An overview of cross-linguistic influence in language learning. Journal of Applied Linguistics and Language Research, 5(3), 186–203.Google Scholar
Saito, Y., Garza, T., & Horwitz, E. (1999). Foreign language reading anxiety. Modern Language Journal, 83(2), 202–218.Google Scholar
Seidenberg, M. (2013). The science of reading and its educational implications. Language Learning and Development, 9(4), 331–360.Google Scholar
Seidenberg, M. (2017). Language at the Speed of Sight: How We Read, Why So Many Can’t, and What Can Be Done About It. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Shum, K., Ho, C., Siegel, L., & Au, T. (2016). First‐language longitudinal predictors of second‐language literacy in young L2 learners. Reading Research Quarterly, 51(3), 323–344.Google Scholar
Skehan, P. (1989). Individual Differences in Second-Language Learning. London: Arnold.Google Scholar
Skehan, P. (1998). A Cognitive Approach to Language Learning. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Skehan, P., & Ducroquet, L. (1988). A Comparison of First & Foreign Language Learning Ability: A Follow-Up to “The Bristol Language Project.” University of London, Institute of Education.Google Scholar
Sparks, R. (1995). Examining the linguistic coding differences hypothesis to explain individual differences in foreign language learning. Annals of Dyslexia, 45(1), 187–214.Google Scholar
Sparks, R. (2001). Foreign language learning problems of students classified as learning disabled and non-learning disabled: Is there a difference? Topics in Language Disorders, 21(2), 38–54.Google Scholar
Sparks, R. (2006). Is there a “disability” for learning a foreign language? Journal of Learning Disabilities, 39(6), 544–557.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sparks, R. (2012). Individual differences in L2 learning and long‐term L1–L2 relationships. Language Learning, 62, 5–27.Google Scholar
Sparks, R. (2015). Language deficits in poor L2 comprehenders: The simple view. Foreign Language Annals, 48(4), 635–658.Google Scholar
Sparks, R. (2016). Myths about foreign language learning and learning disabilities. Foreign Language Annals, 49(2), 252–270.Google Scholar
Sparks, R. (2021). Identification and characteristics of strong, average, and weak foreign language readers: The Simple View of Reading model. Modern Language Journal, 105(2), 507–525.Google Scholar
Sparks, R. (2022a). Where does language aptitude come from? Redux. Language Teaching Research Quarterly, 22, 7–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sparks, R. (2022b). Exploring L1-L2 Relationships: The Impact of Individual Differences. Bristol, UK: Multilingual Matters.Google Scholar
Sparks, R. & Alamer, A. (2022). Long-term impacts of L1 language skills on L2 anxiety: The mediating role of language aptitude and L2 achievement. Language Teaching Research. Published online 7/1/22Google Scholar
Sparks, R. & Dale, P. (2022). The prediction from MLAT to L2 achievement is largely due to MLAT assessment of underlying L1 abilities. Submitted.Google Scholar
Sparks, R., Dale, P., Patton, J., & Luebbers, J. (in press). Individual differences in L1 attainment and language aptitude predict L2 achievement in instructed language learners. Modern Language Journal.Google Scholar
Sparks, R., & Ganschow, L. (1991). Foreign language learning differences: Affective or native language aptitude differences? Modern Language Journal, 75(1), 3–16.Google Scholar
Sparks, R., & Ganschow, L. (1993). Searching for the cognitive locus of foreign language learning difficulties: Linking first and second language learning. Modern Language Journal, 77(3), 289–302.Google Scholar
Sparks, R., & Ganschow, L. (1995). A strong inference approach to causal factors in foreign language learning: A response to Macintyre. Modern Language Journal, 79(2), 235–244.Google Scholar
Sparks, R., & Ganschow, L. (2007). Is the Foreign Language Classroom Anxiety Scale measuring anxiety or language skills? Foreign Language Annals, 40(2), 260–287.Google Scholar
Sparks, R., Ganschow, L., Artzer, M., Siebenhar, D., & Plageman, M. (1997). Language anxiety and proficiency in a foreign language. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 85(2), 559–562.Google Scholar
Sparks, R., Ganschow, L., Fluharty, K., & Little, S. (1996). An exploratory study on the effects of Latin on the native language skills and foreign language aptitude of students with and without learning disabilities. Classical Journal, 91(2), 165–184.Google Scholar
Sparks, R., Ganschow, L., & Javorsky, J. (2000). Déjà vu all over again: A response to Saito, Horwitz, and Garza. Modern Language Journal, 84(2), 251–255.Google Scholar
Sparks, R., Ganschow, L., Javorsky, J., Pohlman, J., & Patton, J. (1992). Identifying native language deficits in high and low risk foreign language learners in high school. Foreign Language Annals, 25(5), 403–418.Google Scholar
Sparks, R., Ganschow, L., & Patton, J. (1995). Prediction of performance in first-year foreign language courses: Connections between native language and foreign language learning. Journal of Educational Psychology, 87(4), 638–655.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sparks, R., Ganschow, L., Patton, J., et al. (1997). Prediction of proficiency in a foreign language. Journal of Educational Psychology, 89(3), 549–561.Google Scholar
Sparks, R., Ganschow, L., & Pohlman, J. (1989). Linguistic coding deficits in foreign language learners. Annals of Dyslexia, 39(1), 79–97.Google Scholar
Sparks, R., Javorsky, J., Patton, J., & Ganschow, L. (1998). Principal components analysis of a test battery to predict proficiency in a foreign language. Applied Language Learning, 9, 71–106.Google Scholar
Sparks, R., & Luebbers, J. (2018). How many U.S. high school students have a foreign language reading “disability”? Reading without meaning and the Simple View. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 51(2), 194–208.Google Scholar
Sparks, R., Luebbers, J., Castenada, M., & Patton, J. (2018). U.S. high school students and foreign language reading anxiety: Déjà vu all over again all over again. Modern Language Journal, 102(3), 533–556.Google Scholar
Sparks, R., & Patton, J. (2013). Relationship of L1 skills and L2 aptitude to L2 anxiety on the Foreign Language Classroom Anxiety Scale (FLCAS): Language ability or anxiety? Language Learning, 63(4), 870–895.Google Scholar
Sparks, R., & Patton, J. (2016). Examining the Simple View of Reading (SVR) Model for U.S. high school Spanish students. Hispania, 99(1), 17–33.Google Scholar
Sparks, R., Patton, J., & Ganschow, L. (2012). Cognitive and achievement profiles of more and less successful L2 learners: A cluster analysis study. Learning and Individual Differences, 22(4), 463–472.Google Scholar
Sparks, R., Patton, J., Ganschow, L., & Humbach, N. (2009). Long-term relationships among early L1 skills, L2 aptitude, L2 affect, and later L2 proficiency. Applied Psycholinguistics, 30(4), 725–755.Google Scholar
Sparks, R., Patton, J., Ganschow, L., & Humbach, N. (2011). Subcomponents of second-language aptitude and second-language proficiency. Modern Language Journal, 95(2), 1–21.Google Scholar
Sparks, R., Patton, J., & Ganschow, L., & Humbach, N. (2012). Relationships among L1 print exposure, early L1 literacy, L2 aptitude, and L2 proficiency. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 25, 1599–1634.Google Scholar
Sparks, R., Patton, J., Ganschow, L., Humbach, N., & Javorsky, J. (2006). Native language predictors of foreign language proficiency and foreign language aptitude. Annals of Dyslexia, 56(1), 129–160.Google Scholar
Sparks, R., Patton, J., Ganschow, L., Humbach, N., & Javorsky, J. (2008). Early L1 reading and spelling skills predict later L2 reading and spelling skills. Journal of Educational Psychology, 100(1), 162–174.Google Scholar
Sparks, R., Patton, J., Ganschow, L., Humbach, N., & Javorsky, J. (2009). Long-term cross-linguistic transfer of skills from L1 to L2. Language Learning, 59(1), 203–243.Google Scholar
Sparks, R., Patton, J., & Luebbers, J. (2018a). L2 anxiety and the Foreign Language Reading Anxiety Scale (FLRAS): Listening to the evidence. Foreign Language Annals, 51(4), 1–25.Google Scholar
Sparks, R., Patton, J., & Luebbers, J. (2018b). For U.S. students, L2 reading comprehension is hard because L2 listening comprehension is hard, too. Hispania, 101(2), 183–210.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sparks, R., Patton, J., & Luebbers, J. (2019a). Individual differences in L2 achievement mirror individual differences in L1 skills and L2 aptitude: Crosslinguistic transfer of L1 to L2 skills. Foreign Language Annals, 52(2), 255–283.Google Scholar
Sparks, R., Patton, J., & Luebbers, J. (2019b). Language (L2) aptitude: Insights from U.S. high school students. In Wen, Z., Skehan, P., Biedroń, A., Li, S., & Sparks, R. (eds.), Language Aptitude: Advancing Theory, Testing, Research, and Practice. New York: Routledge, pp. 123–152.Google Scholar
Trang, T. (2012). A review of Horwitz, Horwitz and Cope’s theory of foreign language anxiety and the challenges to the theory. English Language Teaching, 5(1), 69–75.Google Scholar
Verhoeven, L., & Perfetti, C. (eds.) (2017). Learning to Read across Languages and Writing Systems. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Verhoeven, L., & van Leeuwe, J. (2012). The simple view of second language reading throughout the primary grades. Reading and Writing, 25(8), 1805–1818.Google Scholar
Woodcock, R., Muñoz-Sandoval, A., McGrew, K., & Mather, M. (2004, 2007). Batería-III Woodcock-Muñoz. Rolling Meadows, IL: Riverside.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure [email protected] is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×