Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-dsjbd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-25T14:25:50.810Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

7 - Mapping conceptual representations into linguistic representations: the role of attention in grammar

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 June 2012

Russell S. Tomlin
Affiliation:
University of Oregon
Jan Nuyts
Affiliation:
Universitaire Instellung Antwerpen, Belgium
Eric Pederson
Affiliation:
Max-Planck-Institut für Psycholinguistik, The Netherlands
Get access

Summary

Introduction

Two complementary sets of problems face researchers seeking to understand the interplay between conceptual and linguistic representations:

  1. (1) How linguistic representations reveal or constrain conceptual representations, and

  2. How conceptual representations are mapped into linguistic representations.

Most linguistic research aimed at cognitive or conceptual issues in language addresses the first set. Thus, work by Jackendoff (1983, 1987), Lakoff (1987), Lakoff and Johnson (1980), Langacker (1987,1991), Talmy (1988a, 1988b), and others typically begins with observations about language and uses these observations to make interesting and important inferences about what conceptual representations must or might look like given what we have observed about language, in effect reverse-engineering conceptual representations from linguistic representations.

But it is also important to investigate the second set of problems – how conceptual representations are mapped into linguistic representations. This problem is rather different from the first, because it does not make use of language to draw inferences about conceptualization – to use language precludes asking this second question in a non-circular fashion. Instead, the second set of problems requires that one develop a theory or model of conceptualization that is language-independent and then investigate how particular languages, as well as language in general, map those independently describable conceptual representations into linguistic representations.

This chapter presents a framework for investigating how conceptual representations of visual events are mapped into language.

Type
Chapter
Information
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 1997

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure [email protected] is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×