Book contents
- Kierkegaard on Self, Ethics, and Religion
- Kierkegaard on Self, Ethics, and Religion
- Copyright page
- Dedication
- Contents
- Figures and Tables
- Acknowledgments
- Abbreviations
- Introduction
- Part I Self, Despair, and Wholeheartedness
- Part II Morality, Prudence, and Religion
- Part III “Subjectivity, Inwardness, Is Truth”
- Part IV Faith and Reason
- References
- Index
- References
References
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 27 January 2022
Book contents
- Kierkegaard on Self, Ethics, and Religion
- Kierkegaard on Self, Ethics, and Religion
- Copyright page
- Dedication
- Contents
- Figures and Tables
- Acknowledgments
- Abbreviations
- Introduction
- Part I Self, Despair, and Wholeheartedness
- Part II Morality, Prudence, and Religion
- Part III “Subjectivity, Inwardness, Is Truth”
- Part IV Faith and Reason
- References
- Index
- References
Summary
A summary is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- Kierkegaard on Self, Ethics, and ReligionPurity or Despair, pp. 256 - 275Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2022
References
Ad. [pseudonymous reviewer] (1793) “Kritik der Volksmoral für Prediger, nach K. Grundsätzen bearbeitet, von J. P. L. Snell,” Neue allgemeine deutsche Bibliothek 29(5): 551–60.Google Scholar
Adams, Robert M. (1987) The Virtue of Faith and Other Essays in Philosophical Theology, Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Adams, Robert M. (2006) A Theory of Virtue: Excellence in Being for the Good, Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Adams, Robert M. (2016) “Human Autonomy and Theological Ethics,” European Journal for Philosophy of Religion 8(3): 3–20.Google Scholar
Allison, Henry E. (1995) Kant’s Theory of Freedom, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 146–52.Google Scholar
Amesbury, Richard (2017) “Fideism,” in Zalta, Edward (ed.), The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, accessed February 4, 2021, https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/fall2017/entries/fideism/.Google Scholar
Anscombe, Gertrude E. M. (1958) “Modern Moral Philosophy,” Philosophy 33: 1–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Assiter, Alison (2009) Kierkegaard, Metaphysics and Political Theory: Unfinished Selves, London: Continuum (Continuum Studies in Philosophy).Google Scholar
Augustine, (1998) The City of God Against the Pagans, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press (Cambridge Texts in the History of Political Thought).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bader, Ralf M. (2015) “Kantian Axiology and the Dualism of Practical Reason,” in Hirose, Iwan and Olson, Jonas (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Value Theory, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 175–201.Google Scholar
Balle, Nicholai E. (1791) Lærebog i den Evangelisk-Christelige Religion, indrettet til Brug i de danske Skoler, Copenhagen: Schultz.Google Scholar
Barrett, Lee C. (2008) “Anselm of Canterbury: The Ambivalent Legacy of Faith Seeking Understanding,” in Stewart, Jon (ed.), Kierkegaard and the Patristic and Medieval Traditions, Aldershot: Ashgate (Kierkegaard Research: Sources, Reception and Resources, vol. iv), 167–81.Google Scholar
Barrett, Lee C. (2021) “Kierkegaard’s Understanding of Revelation and Its Influence,” in Mezei, Balázs M, Murphy, Francesca A., and Oakes, Kenneth (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Divine Revelation, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 275–91.Google Scholar
Bayer, Oswald (2007) Theology the Lutheran Way, translated by Jeffrey Silcock and Mark Mattes, Grand Rapids, MI: Eerdmans.Google Scholar
Behler, Ernst (1997) “Kierkegaard’s The Concept of Irony with Constant Reference to Romanticism,” in Cappelørn, Niels Jørgen and Stewart, Jon (eds.), Kierkegaard Revisited, Berlin: de Gruyter (Kierkegaard Studies, Monograph Series, vol. I), 13–33.Google Scholar
Beiser, Frederick C. (1987) The Fate of Reason: German Philosophy from Kant to Fichte, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Beiser, Frederick C. (2006) “Moral Faith and the Highest Good,” in Guyer, Paul (ed.), The Cambridge Companion to Kant and Modern Philosophy, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press (Cambridge Companions), 588–629.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bernier, Mark (2015) The Task of Hope in Kierkegaard, Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Betz, John R. (2007) “Hamann before Kierkegaard: A Systematic Theological Oversight,” Pro Ecclesia 16: 299–333.Google Scholar
Betz, John R. (2012) After Enlightenment: The Post-Secular Vision of J. G. Hamann, Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell.Google Scholar
Bishop, John (2016) “Faith,” in Zalta, Edward (ed.), The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, accessed February 4, 2021, https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/win2016/entries/faith/.Google Scholar
Blattberg, Charles (2020) “Kierkegaard’s Deep Diversity: The One and the Many,” in Fox-Muraton, Melissa (ed.), Kierkegaard and Issues in Contemporary Ethics, Berlin: de Gruyter (Kierkegaard Studies, Monograph Series, vol. xli), 51–68.Google Scholar
Bohlin, Torsten (1944) Kierkegaard Tro och andra Kierkegaardstudier, Stockholm: Svenska Kyrkans Diakonistyrelse.Google Scholar
Bøhn, Einar Duenger (2013) “The Logic of the Incarnation,” in Schumann, Andrew (ed.), Logic in Orthodox Christian Thinking, Heusenstamm: Ontos Verlag, 104–21.Google Scholar
Bohrer, Karl Heinz (1989) Die Kritik der Romantik: Der Verdacht der Philosophie gegen die literarische Moderne, Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp.Google Scholar
Boldt, Joachim (2006) Kierkegaards “Furcht und Zittern” als Bild seines ethischen Erkenntnisbegriffs, Berlin: de Gruyter (Kierkegaard Studies, Monograph Series, vol. xiii).Google Scholar
Booth, Anthony R. (2016) Islamic Philosophy and the Ethics of Belief, London: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
Brandes, Georg (1877) Søren Kierkegaard: En Kritisk Fremstilling i Grundrids, Copenhagen: Gyldendal.Google Scholar
Breazeale, Daniel and Zöller, Günter (2005) “Introduction,” in Fichte, Johann Gottlieb, The System of Ethics: According to the Principles of the Wissenschaftslehre, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press (Cambridge Texts in the History of Philosophy), vii–xxxiii.Google Scholar
Bubbio, Paolo Diego (2014) Sacrifice in the Post-Kantian Tradition: Perspectivism, Intersubjectivity, and Recognition, Albany, NY: State University of New York Press (SUNY Series in Contemporary Continental Philosophy).Google Scholar
Buben, Adam (2013) “Neither Irrationalist Nor Apologist: Revising Faith and Reason in Kierkegaard,” Philosophy Compass 8: 318–26.Google Scholar
Buss, Sarah (1999) “What Practical Reasoning Must Be If We Act for Our Own Reasons,” Australasian Journal of Philosophy 77: 399–421.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carr, Karen (1996) “The Offense of Reason and the Passion of Faith: Kierkegaard and Anti-Rationalism,” Faith and Philosophy 13: 236–51.Google Scholar
Carr, Karen (2019) “Christian Epistemology and the Anthropology of Sin: Kierkegaard on Natural Theology and the Concept of ‘Offense’,” in Stokes, Patrick, Helms, Eleanor, and Buben, Adam (eds.), The Kierkegaardian Mind, London: Routledge (Routledge Philosophical Minds), 365–76.Google Scholar
Caswell, Matthew (2007) “Kant on the Diabolic Will: A Neglected Alternative?,” Kantian Review 12: 147–57.Google Scholar
Chang, Ruth (ed.), (1997a) Incommensurability, Incomparability, and Practical Reason, London: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Chang, Ruth (1997b) “Introduction,” in Chang, Ruth (ed.), Incommensurability, Incomparability, and Practical Reason, London: Harvard University Press, 1–34.Google Scholar
Chignell, Andrew (2018) “The Ethics of Belief,” in Zalta, Edward (ed.), The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, accessed February 4, 2021, https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/spr2018/entries/ethics-belief.Google Scholar
Clark, Justin (2016) “Eudaimonistic Virtue Ethics and Self-Effacement,” The Journal of Value Inquiry 50: 507–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cohen, Andrew J. (2008) “Existentialist Voluntarism as a Source of Normativity,” Philosophical Papers 37: 89–129.Google Scholar
Collins, James (1967) The Emergence of Philosophy of Religion, New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Compaijen, Rob (2018) Kierkegaard, MacIntyre, Williams, and the Internal Point of View, New York: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
Czakó, István (2015) “Rethinking Religion Existentially: New Approaches to Classical Problems of Religious Philosophy in Kierkegaard,” in Stewart, Jon (ed.), A Companion to Kierkegaard, Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell (Blackwell Companions to Philosophy, vol. lviii), 281–94.Google Scholar
Dalferth, Ingolf (2015) “The Middle Term: Kierkegaard and the Contemporary Debate about Explanatory Theism,” Kierkegaard Studies Yearbook 20: 69–90.Google Scholar
Das, Ramon (2017) “Virtue Ethics and Right Action: A Critique,” in Besser-Jones, Lorraine and Slote, Michael (eds.), The Routledge Companion to Virtue Ethics, London: Routledge (Routledge Philosophy Companions), 331–43.Google Scholar
Davenport, John (2007) Will as Commitment and Resolve: An Existential Account of Creativity, Love, Virtue, and Happiness, New York: Fordham University Press.Google Scholar
Davenport, John (2008a) “Faith as Eschatological Trust in Fear and Trembling,” in Mooney, Edward (ed.), Ethics, Love, and Faith in Kierkegaard, Indianapolis: Indiana University Press, 196–233, 265–74.Google Scholar
Davenport, John (2008b) “Kierkegaard’s Postscript in light of Fear and Trembling: Eschatological Faith,” Revista Portuguesa de Filosofia 64: 879–908.Google Scholar
Davenport, John (2012) Narrative Identity, Autonomy, and Mortality: From Frankfurt and MacIntyre to Kierkegaard, London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Davenport, John (2013) “Selfhood and Spirit,” in Lippitt, John and Pattison, George (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Kierkegaard, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 230–51.Google Scholar
Davenport, John (2017) “The Esthetic Validity of Marriage: Romantic Marriage as a Model for Ethical Will: In Defense of Judge Wilhelm,” in Deuser, Hermann and Kleinert, Markus (eds.), Søren Kierkegaard: Entweder– Oder, Berlin: de Gruyter, 169–92.Google Scholar
Despland, Michel (1973) Kant on History and Religion, Montreal: McGill-Queen’s University Press.Google Scholar
Deuser, Hermann (1998) “Religious Dialectics and Christology,” in Hannay, Alastair and Marino, Gordon (eds.), The Cambridge Companion to Kierkegaard, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press (Cambridge Companions), 376–96.Google Scholar
Di Giovanni, George and Livieri, Paolo (2018) “Friedrich Heinrich Jacobi,” in Zalta, Edward (ed.), The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, accessed February 4, 2021, https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/win2018/entries/friedrich-jacobi.Google Scholar
Dorrien, Gary (2012) Kantian Reason and Hegelian Spirit: The Idealistic Logic of Modern Theology, Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dreyfus, Hubert (2008) “Kierkegaard on the Self,” in Mooney, Edward (ed.), Ethics, Love, and Faith in Kierkegaard, Bloomington: Indiana University Press, 11–23, 246–7.Google Scholar
Driver, Julia (2017) “The Consequentialist Critique of Virtue Ethics,” in Besser-Jones, Lorraine and Slote, Michael (eds.), The Routledge Companion to Virtue Ethics, London: Routledge (Routledge Philosophy Companions), 321–9.Google Scholar
Düsing, Klaus (1973) “Die Rezeption der Kantischen Postulatenlehre in den frühen philosophischen Entwürfen Schellings und Hegels,” Hegel-Studien 9: 53–90.Google Scholar
Eiríksson, Magnús (1846) Tro, Overtro og Vantro, i deres Forhold til Fornuft og Forstand, samt til hinanden indbyrdes, Copenhagen: H. C. Klein.Google Scholar
Eiríksson, Magnús [Nicolaus, Theophilus] (1850) Er Troen et Paradox og “i Kraft af det Absurde”? et Spørgsmaal foranlediget ved “Frygt og Bæven, af Johannes de silentio”, Besvaret ved Hjelp af en Troes-Ridders fortrolige Meddelelser, til fælles Opbyggelse for Jøder, Christne og Muhamedanere, af bemeldte Troes-Ridders Broder, Copenhagen: Chr. Steen & Søn.Google Scholar
Eiríksson, Magnús (1866) Gud og Reformatoren: En religiøs Idee. Samt nogle Bemærkninger om de kirkelige Tilstande, Dr. S. Kierkegaard og Forfatteren, Copenhagen: J. H. Schubothe.Google Scholar
Emmanuel, Steven (1996) Kierkegaard and the Concept of Revelation, Albany, NY: State University of New York Press.Google Scholar
Evans, Charles S. (1982) Subjectivity and Religious Belief: An Historical, Critical Study, Washington, DC: University Press of America.Google Scholar
Evans, Charles S. (1999) Kierkegaard’s Fragments and Postscript: The Religious Philosophy of Johannes Climacus, New York: Humanity Books.Google Scholar
Evans, Charles S. (2006a) Kierkegaard’s Ethics of Love: Divine Commands and Moral Obligations, Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Evans, Charles S. (2006b) Kierkegaard on Faith and the Self: Collected Essays, Waco, TX: Baylor University Press.Google Scholar
Evans, Charles S. (2009) Kierkegaard: An Introduction, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Evans, Charles S. (2010) Natural Signs and Knowledge of God: A New Look at Theistic Arguments, Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Evans, Charles S. (2012) “Faith and Reason in Kierkegaard’s Concluding Unscientific Postscript,” in Furtak, Rick Anthony (ed.), Kierkegaard’s Concluding Unscientific Postscript: A Critical Guide, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press (Cambridge Critical Guides), 204–18.Google Scholar
Evans, Charles S. (2015) “Can an Admirer of Silentio’s Abraham Consistently Believe That Child Sacrifice Is Forbidden?,” in Conway, Daniel (ed.), Kierkegaard’s Fear and Trembling: A Critical Guide, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press (Cambridge Critical Guides), 61–78.Google Scholar
Evans, Charles S. and Roberts, Robert C. (2013) “Ethics,” in Lippitt, John and Pattison, George (ed.), The Oxford Handbook of Kierkegaard, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 211–29.Google Scholar
Evans, Charles S. and Walsh, Sylvia (2006) “Introduction,” in Kierkegaard, , Fear and Trembling, edited by Evans, C. S. and Walsh, Sylvia, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press (Cambridge Texts in the History of Philosophy), vi–xxx.Google Scholar
Fabro, Cornelio (1962) “Faith and Reason in Kierkegaard’s Dialectic,” in Johnson, Howard A. and Thulstrup, Niels (eds.), A Kierkegaard Critique: An International Selection of Essays Interpreting Kierkegaard, New York: Harper, 156–206.Google Scholar
Fahrenbach, Helmut (1968) Kierkegaards existenzdialektische Ethik, Frankfurt am Main: Klosterman.Google Scholar
Ferreira, M. Jamie (1998) “Faith and the Kierkegaardian Leap,” in Hannay, Alastair and Marino, Gordon (eds.), The Cambridge Companion to Kierkegaard, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press (Cambridge Companions), 207–34.Google Scholar
Ferreira, M. Jamie (2001) Love’s Grateful Striving: A Commentary on Kierkegaard’s Works of Love,Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Fichte, Johann Gottlieb (2005) The System of Ethics: According to the Principles of the Wissenschaftslehre, translated by Breazeale, Daniel and Zöller, Günter, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press (Cambridge Texts in the History of Philosophy).Google Scholar
Firestone, Chris L. and Jacobs, Nathan (2008) In Defense of Kant’s Religion, Indianapolis: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
Formosa, Paul (2009) “Kant on the Limits of Human Evil,” Journal of Philosophical Research 34: 189–214.Google Scholar
Forrest, Peter (2017) “The Epistemology of Religion,” in Zalta, Edward (ed.), The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, accessed February 4, 2021, https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/sum2017/entries/religion-epistemology.Google Scholar
Forschner, Maximilian (1992) “Das Ideal des moralischen Glaubens. Religionsphilosophie in Kants Reflexionen,” in Ricken, Friedo and Marty, François (eds.), Kant über Religion, Berlin: Kohlhammer, 83–99.Google Scholar
Fossheim, Hallvard (2015) “Aristotle on Virtuous Questioning of Morality,” in Himmelmann, Beatrix and Louden, Robert B. (eds.), Why Be Moral?, Berlin: de Gruyter, 65–80.Google Scholar
Fox-Muraton, Melissa (2012) “Election or the Individual? Levinas on Kierkegaard’s Challenges to Judaism,” Kierkegaard Studies Yearbook 17: 367–86.Google Scholar
Fox-Muraton, Melissa (2018) “There Is No Teleological Suspension of the Ethical: Kierkegaard’s Logic against Religious Justification and Moral Exceptionalism,” Kierkegaard Studies Yearbook 23: 3–32.Google Scholar
Fox-Muraton, Melissa (2019a) “Logic, Language, and Existential Knowledge,” in Stokes, Patrick, Helms, Eleanor, and Buben, Adam (eds.), The Kierkegaardian Mind, London: Routledge (Routledge Philosophical Minds), 397–408.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fox-Muraton, Melissa (2019b) “Existence Philosophy as a Humanism?,” Kierkegaard Studies Yearbook 24: 345–73.Google Scholar
Fremstedal, Roe (2006) “Forfekter Kierkegaard fundamentalisme i Frygt og Bæven?,” Norsk teologisk tidsskrift 107: 84–108.Google Scholar
Fremstedal, Roe (2008) “Universalisme, fundamentalisme og Abraham i Frygt og Bæven – et svar til Mjaaland,” Norsk teologisk tidsskrift 109: 159–80.Google Scholar
Fremstedal, Roe (2014a) Kierkegaard and Kant on Radical Evil and the Highest Good: Virtue, Happiness, and the Kingdom of God, Basingstoke, UK: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
Fremstedal, Roe (2014b) “Double Movement,” in Emmanuel, Steven, McDonald, William, and Stewart, Jon (eds.), Kierkegaard’s Concepts: Classicism to Enthusiasm, Farnham, UK: Ashgate (Kierkegaard Research: Sources, Reception and Resources, vol. xv, tome ii), 187–94.Google Scholar
Fremstedal, Roe (2015a) “Kierkegaard’s Use of German Philosophy: Leibniz to Fichte,” in Stewart, Jon (ed.), A Companion to Kierkegaard, Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell (Blackwell Companions to Philosophy, vol. lviii), 36–49.Google Scholar
Fremstedal, Roe (2015b) “Kierkegaard’s Views on Normative Ethics, Moral Agency, and Metaethics,” in Stewart, Jon (ed.), A Companion to Kierkegaard, Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell (Blackwell Companions to Philosophy, vol. lviii), 113–25.Google Scholar
Fremstedal, Roe (2015c) “Why Be Moral? A Kierkegaardian Approach,” in Himmelmann, Beatrix and Louden, Robert B. (eds.), Why Be Moral?, Berlin: de Gruyter 2015, 173–97.Google Scholar
Fremstedal, Roe (2017) “Eiríksson’s Critique of Kierkegaard and Kierkegaard’s (Drafted) Response: Religious Faith, Absurdity, and Rationality,” in Schreiber, Gerhard and Stewart, Jon (eds.), Magnús Eiríksson: A Forgotten Contemporary of Kierkegaard, Copenhagen: Museum Tusculanum Press (Danish Golden Age Studies, vol. x), 145–66.Google Scholar
Fremstedal, Roe (2018) “Morality and Prudence: A Case for Substantial Overlap and Limited Conflict,” Journal of Value Inquiry 52: 1–16.Google Scholar
Fremstedal, Roe (2019a) “Kierkegaard’s Post-Kantian Approach to Anthropology and Selfhood,” in Stokes, Patrick, Helms, Eleanor, and Buben, Adam (eds.), The Kierkegaardian Mind, London: Routledge (Routledge Philosophical Minds), 319–30.Google Scholar
Fremstedal, Roe (2019b) “Demonic Despair under the Guise of the Good? Kierkegaard and Anscombe vs. Velleman,” Inquiry: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy, 1–21, DOI:10.1080/0020174X.2019.1610047.Google Scholar
Fremstedal, Roe (2019c) “Hidden Inwardness and ‘Subjectivity Is Truth’: Kant and Kierkegaard on Moral Psychology and Religious Pragmatism,” in Barrett, Lee C. and Sajda, Peter (eds.), Kierkegaard in Context: A Festschrift for Jon Stewart, Macon, GA: Mercer University Press (Mercer Kierkegaard Series), 112–29.Google Scholar
Fremstedal, Roe (2020a) “Kant and Existentialism: Inescapable Freedom and Self-Deception,” in Stewart, Jon (ed.), The Palgrave Handbook of German Idealism and Existentialism, Basingstoke, UK: Palgrave Macmillan (Palgrave Handbooks in German Idealism), 51–75.Google Scholar
Fremstedal, Roe (2020b) “Kierkegaard on Hope as Essential to Selfhood,” in Stahl, Titus and Blöser, Claudia (eds.), The Moral Psychology of Hope: An Introduction, Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield International (The Moral Psychology of the Emotions), 75–92.Google Scholar
Fremstedal, Roe (2020c) “Søren Kierkegaard’s Critique of Eudaimonism and Autonomy,” in Moggach, Douglas, Mooren, Nadine, and Quante, Michael (eds.), Perfektionismus der Autonomie, Munich: Wilhelm Fink (HegelForum, Studien), 291–308.Google Scholar
Fremstedal, Roe and Jackson, Timothy P. (2015) “Salvation/Eternal Happiness,” in Emmanuel, Steven, McDonald, William, and Stewart, Jon (eds.), Kierkegaard’s Concepts: Salvation to Writing, Farnham, UK: Ashgate (Kierkegaard Research: Sources, Reception and Resources, vol. xv, tome vi), 1–8.Google Scholar
Furtak, Rick Anthony (2005) Wisdom in Love: Kierkegaard and the Ancient Quest for Emotional Integrity, Notre Dame: University of Notre Dame Press.Google Scholar
Furtak, Rick Anthony (2012) “The Kierkegaardian Ideal of ‘Essential Knowing’ and the Scandal of Modern Philosophy,” in Furtak, Rick Anthony (ed.), Kierkegaard’s Concluding Unscientific Postscript: A Critical Guide, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press (Cambridge Critical Guides), 87–110.Google Scholar
Gava, Gabriele and Stern, Robert (eds.) (2017) Pragmatism, Kant, and Transcendental Philosophy, London: Routledge (Routledge Studies in Nineteenth-Century Philosophy).Google Scholar
Geach, Peter (1979) The Virtues: The Stanton Lectures 1973–4, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Glenn, John D., Jr. (1997) “‘A Highest Good … An Eternal Happiness’: The Human Telos in Kierkegaard’s Concluding Unscientific Postscript,” in Perkins, Robert L. (ed.), Concluding Unscientific Postscript to “Philosophical Fragments,” Macon, GA: Mercer University Press (International Kierkegaard Commentary, vol. xii), 247–62.Google Scholar
Gouwens, David J. (1996) Kierkegaard as a Religious Thinker, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Green, Ronald M. (1988) Religion and Moral Reason: A New Method for Comparative Study, Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Green, Ronald M. (1992) Kierkegaard and Kant: The Hidden Debt, Albany, NY: State University of New York Press.Google Scholar
Green, Ronald M. (1994) “Kierkegaard’s Philosophical Fragments: A Kantian Commentary,” in Perkins, Robert L. (ed.), Philosophical Fragments and Johannes Climacus, Macon, GA: Mercer University Press (International Kierkegaard Commentary, vol. vii), 169–202.Google Scholar
Green, Ronald M. (2011) Kant and Kierkegaard on Time and Eternity, Macon, GA: Mercer University Press.Google Scholar
Habermas, Jürgen (2019) Auch eine Geschichte der Philosophie, 2 vols., Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp.Google Scholar
Hannay, Alastair (1993) Kierkegaard, 2nd ed., London: Routledge (The Argument of the Philosophers).Google Scholar
Hannay, Alastair (2006) Kierkegaard and Philosophy: Selected Essays, London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Hannay, Alastair (2009) “Note on the Translation,” in Kierkegaard, Søren, Concluding Unscientific Postscript to the Philosophical Crumbs, edited and translated by Alastair Hannay, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press (Cambridge Texts in the History of Philosophy), xxxvii–xl.Google Scholar
Harbsmeier, Eberhard (1999) “Der Begriff der Innerlichkeit bei Søren Kierkegaard,” Kierkegaardiana 20: 31–50.Google Scholar
Hare, John E. (2001) God’s Call: Moral Realism, God’s Commands and Human Autonomy, Grand Rapids, MI: Eerdmans.Google Scholar
Hare, John E. (2002b) The Moral Gap: Kantian Ethics, Human Limits, and God’s Assistance, Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Hasker, William (1995) “Evidentialism,” in Audi, Robert (ed.), Cambridge Dictionary of Philosophy, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 294.Google Scholar
Hatfield, Gary (2005) “The History of Philosophy as Philosophy,” in Sorell, Tom and Rogers, Graham A. J. (eds.), Analytic Philosophy and History of Philosophy, Oxford: Clarendon Press, 83–128.Google Scholar
Haybron, Daniel (2010) The Pursuit of Unhappiness: The Elusive Psychology of Well-Being, Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Hegel, Georg W. F. (1991a) Elements of the Philosophy of Right, translated by Nisbet, Hugh B., Cambridge: Cambridge University Press (Cambridge Texts in the History of Political Thought).Google Scholar
Hegel, Georg W. F. (1991b) The Encyclopedia Logic: Part One of the Encyclopedia of the Philosophical Sciences with the Zusätze, translated by Geraets, Theodore F., Suchting, Wallis A., and Harris, Henry S., Indianapolis: Hackett.Google Scholar
Hegel, Georg W. F. (1991c) Enzyklopädie der philosophischen Wissenschaften im Grundrisse, 3rd ed. (1830), Hamburg: Meiner.Google Scholar
Helms, Eleanor (2013) “The Objectivity of Faith: Kierkegaard’s Critique of Fideism,” Res Philosophica 90: 439–60.Google Scholar
Helms, Eleanor (2017) “On Climacus’s ‘Against Reason’ Thesis: A Challenge to Westphal,” Faith and Philosophy 34: 471–88.Google Scholar
Helms, Eleanor (2020) “Hope and the Chaos of Imagination in Kant and Kierkegaard,” History of European Ideas, 1–14, DOI:10.1080/01916599.2020.1799556.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Henrich, Dieter (2008) Between Kant and Hegel: Lectures on German Idealism, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Hills, Allison (2010) The Beloved Self: Morality and the Challenge from Egoism, Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Hoeltzel, Steven (2020) “Fichte and Existentialism: Freedom and Finitude, Self-Positing and Striving,” in Stewart, Jon (ed.), The Palgrave Handbook of German Idealism and Existentialism, Basingstoke, UK: Palgrave Macmillan (Palgrave Handbooks in German Idealism), 77–101.Google Scholar
Honenberger, Phillip (ed.), (2015) Naturalism and Philosophical Anthropology: Nature, Life, and the Human between Transcendental and Empirical Perspectives, Basingstoke, UK: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
Horn, Christoph (2014) Nichtideale Normativität: Ein neuer Blick auf Kants politische Philosophie, Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp.Google Scholar
Horn, Robert L. (2007) Positivity and Dialectic: A Study of the Theological Method of Hans Lassen Martensen, Copenhagen: Reitzel (Danish Golden Age Studies, vol. ii).Google Scholar
Hösle, Vittorio (1992) “Kan Abraham reddes? Og: kan Søren Kierkegaard reddes? Et hegelsk oppgjør med ‘Frygt og Bæven’,” Norsk filosofisk tidsskrift 27: 1–26.Google Scholar
Howland, Jacob (2012) “Lessing and Socrates in Kierkegaard’s Postscript,” in Furtak, Rick Anthony (ed.), Kierkegaard’s Concluding Unscientific Postscript: A Critical Guide, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press (Cambridge Critical Guides), 111–31.Google Scholar
Hühn, Lore and Schwab, Philip (2013) “Kierkegaard and German Idealism,” in Lippitt, John and Pattison, George (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Kierkegaard, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 62–93.Google Scholar
Hursthouse, Rosalind (2013) “Virtue Ethics,” in Zalta, Edward (ed.), The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, accessed February 4, 2021, http://plato.stanford.edu/archives/fall2013/entries/ethics-virtue.Google Scholar
Inwagen, Peter van (1996) “It is Wrong, Everywhere, Always, and for Anyone, to Believe Anything upon Insufficient Evidence,” in Jordan, Jeff and Howard-Snyder, Daniel (eds.), Faith, Freedom and Rationality, Lanham, MD: Rowman and Littlefield, 137–53.Google Scholar
Irwin, Terence (1996) “Kant’s Criticism of Eudaemonism,” in Engstrom, Stephen and Whiting, Jennifer (eds.), Aristotle, Kant, and the Stoics: Rethinking Happiness and Duty, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 63–101.Google Scholar
Irwin, Terence (2011) The Development of Ethics: A Historical and Critical Study, 3 vols., Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Jackson, Timothy P. (1987) “Kierkegaard’s Metatheology,” Faith and Philosophy 4: 71–85.Google Scholar
Jackson, Timothy P. (1998) “Arminian Edification: Kierkegaard on Grace and Free Will,” in Hannay, Alastair and Marino, Gordon (eds.), The Cambridge Companion to Kierkegaard, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press (Cambridge Companions), 235–56.Google Scholar
Jackson, Timothy P. (2010) Love Disconsoled: Meditations on Christian Charity, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Jackson, Timothy P. (2014) “The Relevance of God: A Reply to Ronald Dworkin,” The Journal of Law and Religion 29: 535–46.Google Scholar
Jackson, Timothy P. (2017) “Agape and Virtue Ethics,” in Besser-Jones, Lorraine and Slote, Michael (eds.), The Routledge Companion to Virtue Ethics, London: Routledge (Routledge Philosophy Companions), 283–303.Google Scholar
Jacobi, Friedrich Heinrich (2005 [1785]) “Recollections of Conversations with Lessing in July and August 1780,” in Lessing, Gotthold E., Philosophical and Theological Writings, edited and translated by Nisbet, Hugh B., Cambridge: Cambridge University Press (Cambridge Texts in the History of Philosophy), 241–56.Google Scholar
James, David (2011) “The ‘Self-Positing’ Self in Kierkegaard’s The Sickness unto Death,” The European Legacy 16: 587–98.Google Scholar
James, William (1956 [1897]) The Will to Believe and Other Essays in Popular Philosophy, New York: Dover.Google Scholar
Johansen, Kjell Eyvind (1988) Begrepet Gjentagelse hos Søren Kierkegaard, Oslo: Solum.Google Scholar
Johansen, Kjell Eyvind (2002) “Fear and Trembling – the Problem of Justification,” British Journal for the History of Philosophy 10: 261–70.Google Scholar
Jordan, Jeff (2018) “Pragmatic Arguments and Belief in God,” in Zalta, Edward (ed.), The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, accessed February 4, 2021, https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/spr2018/entries/pragmatic-belief-god.Google Scholar
Kangas, David J. (2007) “J.G. Fichte: From Transcendental Ego to Existence,” in Stewart, Jon (ed.), Kierkegaard and His German Contemporaries: Philosophy, Aldershot, UK: Ashgate (Kierkegaard Research: Sources, Reception and Resources, vol. vi, tome i), 67–95.Google Scholar
Katsafanas, Paul (2015) Agency and the Foundation of Ethics: Nietzschean Constitutivism, Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Katsafanas, Paul (2018) “Constitutivism about Practical Reasons,” in Star, Daniel (ed.), The Oxford Handbook of Reasons and Normativity, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 367–91.Google Scholar
Kekes, John (2013) “Meaning and Narratives,” in Himmelmann, Beatrix (ed.), On Meaning in Life, Berlin: de Gruyter, 65–82.Google Scholar
Kisiel, Theodore (2008) “On the Genesis of Heidegger’s Formally Indicative Hermeneutics of Facticity,” in Raffoul, François and Nelson, Eric Sean (eds.), Rethinking Facticity, Albany, NY: State University of New York Press, 41–68.Google Scholar
Knappe, Ulrich (2004) Theory and Practice in Kant and Kierkegaard, Berlin: de Gruyter (Kierkegaard Studies, Monograph Series, vol. ix).Google Scholar
Koch, Carl H. (2003) Dansk oplysningsfilosofi 1700–1800, Copenhagen: Gyldendal (Den danske filosofis historie, vol. iii).Google Scholar
Koch, Carl H. (2004) Den danske idealisme 1800–1880, Copenhagen: Gyldendal (Den danske filosofis historie, vol. iv).Google Scholar
Korsgaard, Christine (1996a) The Sources of Normativity, edited by O’Neill, Onora, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Korsgaard, Christine (1996b) Creating the Kingdom of Ends, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Korsgaard, Christine (2013) Self-Constitution: Action, Identity, and Integrity, Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Kosch, Michelle (2006a) Freedom and Reason in Kant, Schelling, and Kierkegaard, Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Kosch, Michelle (2006b) “Kierkegaard’s Ethicist: Fichte’s Role in Kierkegaard’s Construction of the Ethical Standpoint,” Archiv für Geschichte der Philosophie 88: 261–95.Google Scholar
Kosch, Michelle (2015a) “Fichtean Kantianism in Nineteenth-Century Ethics,” Journal of the History of Philosophy 53: 111–32.Google Scholar
Krishek, Sharon (2009) Kierkegaard on Faith and Love, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press (Modern European Philosophy).Google Scholar
Kyselo, Miriam (2020) “More Than Our Body: Minimal and Enactive Selfhood in Global Paralysis,” Neuroethics 13: 203–20.Google Scholar
Landau, Iddo (2015) “The ‘Why Be Moral?’ Question and the Meaning of Life,” in Himmelmann, Beatrix and Louden, Robert B. (eds.), Why Be Moral?, Berlin: de Gruyter, 159–71.Google Scholar
Landkildehus, Søren (2009) “Kierkegaard and Pascal as Kindred Spirits in the Fight against Christendom,” in Stewart, Jon (ed.), Kierkegaard and the Renaissance and Modern Traditions: Philosophy, Farnham, UK: Ashgate (Kierkegaard Research: Sources, Reception and Resources, vol. v, tome i), 129–46.Google Scholar
Law, David (2015) “Kierkegaard as Existentialist Dogmatician: Kierkegaard on Systematic Theology, Doctrine and Dogmatics,” in Stewart, Jon (ed.), A Companion to Kierkegaard, Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell (Blackwell Companions to Philosophy, vol. lviii), 253–68.Google Scholar
Leffler, Olof (2016) “The Foundations of Agency – and Ethics?,” Philosophia (Ramat-Gan) 44: 547–63.Google Scholar
Lessing, Gotthold E. (1777) Über den Beweis des Geistes und der Kraft: An den Herrn Director Schumann, zu Hannover, Braunschweig: [Buchhandlung des Waisenhauses].Google Scholar
Lessing, Gotthold E. (2005) Philosophical and Theological Writings, edited and translated by Nisbet, Hugh B., Cambridge: Cambridge University Press (Cambridge Texts in the History of Philosophy).Google Scholar
Lippitt, John (2000) Humour and Irony in Kierkegaard’s Thought, Basingstoke, UK: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
Lippitt, John (2013) Kierkegaard and the Problem of Self-Love, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Løkke, Håvard (2010) “Nicomachean Ethics: Ignorance and Relationships,” Stewart, Jon and Nun, Katalin (eds.), Kierkegaard and the Greek World: Aristotle and Other Greek Authors, Farnham, UK: Ashgate (Kierkegaard Research: Sources, Reception and Resources, vol. ii, tome ii), 47–58.Google Scholar
Løkke, Håvard and Waaler, Arild (2009) “Gottfried Wilhelm Leibniz: Traces of Kierkegaard’s Reading of the Theodicy,” in Stewart, Jon (ed.), Kierkegaard and the Renaissance and Modern Traditions: Philosophy, Farnham, UK: Ashgate (Kierkegaard Research: Sources, Reception and Resources, vol. v, tome i), 51–76.Google Scholar
Louden, Robert B. (2002) Kant’s Impure Ethics: From Rational Beings to Human Beings, Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Louden, Robert B. (2011) Kant’s Human Being: Essays on His Theory of Human Nature, Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Louden, Robert B. (2015a) “Why Be Moral? A New Answer to an Old Question,” in Himmelmann, Beatrix and Louden, Robert B. (eds.), Why Be Moral?, Berlin: de Gruyter, 45–64.Google Scholar
Louden, Robert B. (2015b) “The End of All Human Action/The Final Object of All My Conduct: Aristotle and Kant on the Highest Good,” in Aufderheide, Joachim and Bader, Ralf (eds.), The Highest Good in Aristotle and Kant, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 112–28.Google Scholar
Lübcke, Poul (1991) “An Analytic Interpretation of Kierkegaard as a Moral Philosopher,” Kierkegaardiana 15: 93–103.Google Scholar
Lübcke, Poul (2006) “Kierkegaard’s Concept of Revelation,” in Linde, Gesche, Purkarthofer, Richard, Schulz, Heiko, and Steinacker, Peter (eds.), Theologie zwischen Pragmatismus und Existenzdenken, Marburg: Elwert, 405–14.Google Scholar
Malantschuk, Gregor (1968) Dialektik og Eksistens hos Søren Kierkegaard, Copenhagen: Reitzel.Google Scholar
Malantschuk, Gregor (1978) Fra Individ til den Enkelte: Problemer omkring Friheden og det etiske hos Søren Kierkegaard, Copenhagen: Reitzel.Google Scholar
Manis, Zachary (2006) “Virtues, Divine Commands, and the Debt of Creation,” Ph.D. dissertation, Baylor University.Google Scholar
Manis, Zachary (2009a) “Kierkegaard and Divine-Command Theory: Replies to Quinn and Evans,” Religious Studies 45: 289–307.Google Scholar
Manis, Zachary (2009b) “Foundations for a Kierkegaardian Account of Moral Obligation,” Southwest Philosophy Review 25: 71–81.Google Scholar
Marina, Jacqueline (2000) “Making Sense of Kant’s Highest Good,” Kant-Studien 91: 329–55.Google Scholar
Marquard, Odo (1971) “Anthropologie,” in Ritter, Joachim (ed.), Historische Wörterbuch der Philosophie, vol. i, Basel: Schwabe, 362–74.Google Scholar
Marshall, Ronald F. (2013) Kierkegaard for the Church: Essays and Sermons, Eugene, OR: Wipf & Stock.Google Scholar
Martens, Paul (2015) “H.H.: A Guerrilla Writer after Theologians … and More,” in Nun, Katalin and Stewart, Jon (eds.), Kierkegaard’s Pseudonyms, Farnham, UK: Ashgate (Kierkegaard Research: Sources, Reception and Resources, vol. xvii), 89–96.Google Scholar
Martin, Mike K. (2012) Happiness and the Good Life, Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McCombs, Richard (2013) The Paradoxical Rationality of Søren Kierkegaard, Bloomington: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
McCormick, Miriam (2015) Believing against the Evidence: Agency and the Ethics of Belief, London: Routledge.Google Scholar
McDaniel, Kris (2020) “Teleological Suspensions in Fear and Trembling,” Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 100: 425–51.Google Scholar
McKinnon, Alastair (1980) “Irrational,” in Thulstrup, Niels and Thulstrup, Maria Mikulová (eds.), Concepts and Alternatives in Kierkegaard, Copenhagen: Reitzel (Biblioteca Kierkegaardiana, vol. iii), 126–7.Google Scholar
McKinnon, Alastair (1998) “Kierkegaard’s Conceptual Confusion,” Kierkegaardiana 20: 71–82.Google Scholar
Mendham, Matthew (2007) “Eudaimonia and Agape in MacIntyre and Kierkegaard’s Works of Love,” Journal of Religious Ethics 35: 591–625.Google Scholar
Michalson, Gordon E. Jr. (1985) Lessing’s “Ugly Ditch”: A Study of Theology and History, University Park, PA and London: The Pennsylvania State University Press.Google Scholar
Migliore, Daniel L. (2014) Faith Seeking Understanding: An Introduction to Christian Theology, 3rd ed., Grand Rapids, MI: Eerdmans.Google Scholar
Mill, John Stuart (1969) Essays on Ethics, Religion, and Society, edited by Robson, John M., vol. x of The Collected Works of John Stuart Mill, London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
Millay, Thomas J. (2015) “Petrus Minor: A Lowly and Insignificant Ministering Critic,” in Nun, Katalin and Stewart, Jon (eds.), Kierkegaard’s Pseudonyms, Farnham, UK: Ashgate (Kierkegaard Research: Sources, Reception and Resources, vol. xvii), 215–21.Google Scholar
Mjaaland, Marius (2007) “Funderinger over Abrahams offer: Fundamentalisme, mysterium og teleologisk suspensjon i Kierkegaards Frygt og Bæven,” Norsk teologisk tidsskrift 108: 116–43.Google Scholar
Møller, Poul M. (1842) “Tanker over Mueligheden af Beviser for Menneskets Udødelighed, med Hensyn til den nyeste derhen hørende Literatur,” vol. ii of Efterladte Skrifter, Copenhagen: Bianco Lund, 158–272.Google Scholar
Mooney, Edward (2012) “From the Garden of the Dead: Climacus on Intrapersonal Inwardness,” in Furtak, Rick Anthony (ed.), Kierkegaard’s Concluding Unscientific Postscript: A Critical Guide, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press (Cambridge Critical Guides), 64–86.Google Scholar
Morgan, Seiriol (2005) “The Missing Formal Proof of Humanity’s Radical Evil in Kant’s Religion,” The Philosophical Review 114: 63–114.Google Scholar
Mulder, Jack, Jr. (2002) “Re-Radicalizing Kierkegaard: An Alternative to Religiousness C in Light of an Investigation into the Teleological Suspension of the Ethical,” Continental Philosophy Review 35: 303–24.Google Scholar
Mulligan, Kevin (2010) “Emotions and Values,” in Goldie, Peter (ed.), The Oxford Handbook of Philosophy of Emotion, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 475–500.Google Scholar
Nason, Shannon (2012) “Contingency, Necessity, and Causation in Kierkegaard’s Theory of Change,” British Journal for the History of Philosophy 20: 141–62.Google Scholar
Neiman, Susan (1997) The Unity of Reason: Rereading Kant, Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Nielsen, Rasmus (1849) Mag. Kierkegaards “Johannes Climacus” og Dr. H. Martensens “Christelige Dogmatik”: En undersøgende Anmeldelse, Copenhagen: Reitzel.Google Scholar
Olivares-Bøgeskov, Benjamin (2014) “Happiness,” in Emmanuel, Steven, McDonald, William, and Stewart, Jon (eds.), Kierkegaard’s Concepts: Envy to Incognito, Farnham, UK: Ashgate (Kierkegaard Research: Sources, Reception and Resources, vol. xv, tome iii), 137–44.Google Scholar
Orth, Ernst W. (1997) “Philosophical Anthropology,” in Embree, Lester, Behnke, Elisabeth A., Carr, David et al. (eds.), Encyclopedia of Phenomenology, London: Kluwer, 522–5.Google Scholar
Osborn, Eric (1987) Tertullian: First Theologian of the West, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Palmquist, Stephen R. (1992) “Does Kant Reduce Religion to Morality?,” Kant-Studien 83: 129–48.Google Scholar
Palmquist, Stephen R. (2016) “The Paradox of Inwardness in Kant and Kierkegaard: Ronald Green’s Legacy in Philosophy of Religion,” Journal of Religious Ethics 44: 738–51.Google Scholar
Pattison, George (1997) “‘Before God’ as a Regulative Concept,” Kierkegaard Studies Yearbook 2: 70–84.Google Scholar
Pattison, George (2002) Kierkegaard’s Upbuilding Discourses: Philosophy, Theology, Literature, London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Piety, Marilyn G. (2010) Ways of Knowing: Kierkegaard’s Pluralist Epistemology, Waco, TX: Baylor University Press.Google Scholar
Piety, Marilyn G. (2017) “Kierkegaard on Nature and Miracles: A Reply to Hampson,” accessed February 1, 2018, https://pietyonkierkegaard.com/tag/kierkegaard-on-kant/.Google Scholar
Pinkard, Terry (2010) German Philosophy 1760–1860: The Legacy of Idealism, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Purkarthofer, Richard (2009) “Some Remarks on Kierkegaard’s Method of Indirect Proof in The Book on Adler,” in Kralik, Roman, Khan, Abrahim, Sajda, Peter, Turnbull, Jamie, Burgess, Andrew J. (eds.), Kierkegaard and the Nineteenth Century Religious Crisis in Europe, Toronto: Kierkegaard Circle (Acta Kierkegaardiana, vol. iv), 251–9.Google Scholar
Quinn, Philip L. (1996) “The Divine Command Ethics in Kierkegaard’s Works of Love,” in Jordan, Jeff and Howard-Snyder, Daniel (eds.), Faith, Freedom, and Rationality, Lanham, MD: Rowman and Littlefield, 29–44.Google Scholar
Quinn, Philip L. (1998) “Kierkegaard’s Christian Ethics,” in Hannay, Alastair and Marino, Gordon D. (eds.), The Cambridge Companion to Kierkegaard, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press (Cambridge Companions), 349–75.Google Scholar
Quinn, Philip L. (2006) Essays in the Philosophy of Religion, Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Rapic, Smail (2007) Ethische Selbstverständigung: Kierkegaards Auseinandersetzung mit der Ethik Kants und der Rechtsphilosophie Hegels, Berlin: de Gruyter (Kierkegaard Studies, Monograph Series, vol. xvi).Google Scholar
Rapp, Gottlob Christian (1791) Ueber die Untauglichkeit des Prinzips der allgemeinen und eigenen Glückseligkeit zum Grundgesetze der Sittlichkeit, Jena: Nauke.Google Scholar
Rasmussen, Anders Moe (2009) “Friedrich Heinrich Jacobi: Two Theories of the Leap,” in Stewart, Jon (ed.), Kierkegaard and the Renaissance and Modern Traditions: Philosophy, Aldershot, UK: Ashgate (Kierkegaard Research: Sources, Reception and Resources, vol. v, tome i), 33–49.Google Scholar
Reisner, Andrew (2018) “Pragmatic Reasons for Belief,” in Star, Daniel (ed.), The Oxford Handbook of Reasons and Normativity, Oxford University Press, 705–28.Google Scholar
Ricoeur, Paul (1998) “Philosophy after Kierkegaard,” in Chamberlain, Jonathan and Ree, Jane (eds.), Kierkegaard: A Critical Reader, Oxford: Blackwell, 9–25.Google Scholar
Roberts, Robert C. (2008) “Kierkegaard and Ethical Theory,” in Mooney, Edward (ed.), Ethics, Love, and Faith in Kierkegaard, Bloomington: Indiana University Press, 72–92, 256–7.Google Scholar
Rocca, Ettore (2002) “If Abraham Is Not a Human Being,” Kierkegaard Studies Yearbook 7: 247–58.Google Scholar
Rosenau, Hartmut (2007) “I.H. Fichte: Philosophy as the Most Cheerful Form of Service to God,” in Stewart, Jon (ed.), Kierkegaard and His German Contemporaries: Philosophy, Aldershot, UK: Ashgate (Kierkegaard Research: Sources, Reception and Resources, vol. vi, tome i), 49–66.Google Scholar
Rudd, Anthony (2001) “Reason in Ethics: MacIntyre and Kierkegaard,” in Davenport, John and Rudd, Anthony (eds.), Kierkegaard after MacIntyre: Essays on Freedom, Narrative, and Virtue, Chicago: Open Court, 131–50.Google Scholar
Rudd, Anthony (2005) Kierkegaard and the Limits of the Ethical, Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Rudd, Anthony (2012) Self, Value, and Narrative: A Kierkegaardian Approach, Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Šajda, Peter (2009) “François de Salignac de la Mothe-Fénelon: Clearing the Way for The Sickness unto Death,” in Stewart, Jon (ed.), Kierkegaard and the Renaissance and Modern Traditions: Theology, Farnham, UK: Ashgate (Kierkegaard Research: Sources, Reception and Resources, vol. v, tome ii), 129–48.Google Scholar
Schaber, Peter (2015) “Why Be Moral: A Meaningful Question?,” in Himmelmann, Beatrix and Louden, Robert B. (eds.), Why Be Moral?, Berlin: de Gruyter, 31–41.Google Scholar
Schmitt, Carl (2007) The Concept of the Political: Expanded Edition, translated by Schwab, Georg, Chicago: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schopenhauer, Arthur (1969) The World as Will and Representation, translated by Payne, Eric F. J., 2 vols., New York: Dover.Google Scholar
Gerhard, Schreiber (2009) “Magnús Eiríksson: An Opponent of Martensen and an Unwelcome Ally of Kierkegaard,” in Stewart, Jon (ed.), Kierkegaard and His Danish Contemporaries: Theology, Aldershot, UK: Ashgate (Kierkegaard Research: Sources, Reception and Resources, vol. vii, tome ii), 49–94.Google Scholar
Gerhard, Schreiber (2018) Happy Passion: Studies in Kierkegaard’s Theory of Faith, Berlin: Peter Lang (Theologisch-Philosophische Beiträge zu Gegenwartsfragen).Google Scholar
Gerhard, Schreiber (2019) “Passage to Divinity: Magnús Eiríksson on the Rationality of Faith,” in Schreiber, Gerhard (ed.), Interesse am Anderen: Interdisziplinäre Beiträge zum Verhältnis von Religion und Rationalität. Für Heiko Schulz zum 60. Geburtstag, Berlin: de Gruyter (Theologische Bibliothek Töpelmann, vol. clxxxvii), 259–83.Google Scholar
Schulz, Heiko (2015) “O2 Can Do? Kierkegaard and the Debate on Divine Omnipotence,” Kierkegaard Studies Yearbook 20: 91–125.Google Scholar
Schwarz, Gerhard (2004) Est Deus in nobis: Die Identität von Gott und reiner praktischer Vernunft in Immanuel Kants “Kritik der praktischen Vernunft,” Berlin: Verlag TU.Google Scholar
Silber, John (1963) “The Importance of the Highest Good in Kant’s Ethics,” Ethics 73: 179–97.Google Scholar
Sinnott-Armstrong, Walter (2019) “Practical Moral Skepticism,” in Zalta, Edward (ed.), The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, accessed March 8, 2021, https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/skepticism-moral/supplement.html.Google Scholar
Skirbekk, Gunnar (1994) Rationality and Modernity: Essays in Philosophical Pragmatics, Oslo: Scandinavian University Press.Google Scholar
Snell, Johann P. (1793) Kritik der Volksmoral für Prediger: Nach Kantischen Grundsätzen bearbeitet, Frankfurt am Main: Pech.Google Scholar
Söderquist, Kent B. (2019) “On Faith and Reason(s): Kierkegaard’s Logic of Conviction,” in Stokes, Patrick, Helms, Eleanor, and Buben, Adam (eds.), The Kierkegaardian Mind, London: Routledge (Routledge Philosophical Minds), 227–38.Google Scholar
Søltoft, Pia (2000) Svimmelhedens etik – om forholdet mellem den enkelte og den andre hos Buber, Lévinas og især Kierkegaard, Copenhagen: Gad.Google Scholar
Stan, Leo (2011) “Slavoj Žižek: Mirroring the Absent God,” in Stewart, Jon (ed.), Kierkegaard’s Influence on the Social Sciences, Aldershot, UK: Ashgate (Kierkegaard Research: Sources, Reception and Resources, vol. xiii), 297–321.Google Scholar
Stan, Leo (2017) Selfhood and Otherness in Kierkegaard’s Authorship: A Heterological Investigation, Lanham, MD: Lexington.Google Scholar
Stern, Robert (2012) Understanding Moral Obligation: Kant, Hegel, Kierkegaard, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press (Modern European Philosophy).Google Scholar
Stern, Robert (2017) “Round Kant or Through Him? On James’s Arguments for Freedom, and Their Relation to Kant’s,” in Gava, Gabriele and Stern, Robert (eds.), Pragmatism, Kant, and Transcendental Philosophy, London: Routledge (Routledge Studies in Nineteenth-Century Philosophy), 152–76.Google Scholar
Stewart, Jon (2003) Kierkegaard’s Relations to Hegel Reconsidered, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press (Modern European Philosophy).Google Scholar
Stewart, Jon (2007) A History of Hegelianism in Golden Age Denmark: The Martensen Period: 1837–1842, Copenhagen: Reitzel (Danish Golden Age Studies, vol. iii, tome ii).Google Scholar
Stewart, Jon (ed.), (2009) Kierkegaard’s International Reception: Northern and Western Europe, Farnham, UK: Ashgate (Kierkegaard Research: Sources, Reception and Resources, vol. viii, tome i).Google Scholar
Stewart, Jon (2010) Idealism and Existentialism: Hegel and Twentieth-Century European Philosophy, London: Continuum.Google Scholar
Stewart, Jon (2015a) “Poul Martin Møller and the Danish Debate about Immorality in the Wake of Hegel’s Philosophy,” Estudios Kierkegaardianos. Revista de filosofía 1: 115–46.Google Scholar
Stewart, Jon (2015b) Søren Kierkegaard: Subjectivity, Irony and the Crisis of Modernity, Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Stilling, Peter Michael (1850) Om den indbilte Forsoning af Tro og – Viden med særligt Hensyn til Prof. Martensens “christelige Dogmatik.” Kritisk-polemisk Afhandling, Copenhagen: Reitzel, accessed October 21, 2021, www.kb.dk/e-mat/dod/11030800900B.pdf.Google Scholar
Stokes, Patrick (2010) Kierkegaard’s Mirrors: Interest, Self, and Moral Vision, Basingstoke, UK: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
Stokes, Patrick (2015) The Naked Self: Kierkegaard and Personal Identity, Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Stokes, Patrick (2019) “Consciousness, Self, and Reflection,” in Stokes, Patrick, Helms, Eleanor, and Buben, Adam (eds.), The Kierkegaardian Mind, London: Routledge (Routledge Philosophical Minds), 269–80.Google Scholar
Stolzenberg, Jürgen (2010) “Moralisches und religiöses Selbstbewusstsein bei Fichte und im Blick auf Søren Kierkegaard,” in Stolzenberg, Jürgen and Rapic, Smail (eds.), Kierkegaard und Fichte: Praktische und religiöse Subjektivität, Berlin: de Gruyter (Kierkegaard Studies, Monograph Series, vol. xxii), 1–21.Google Scholar
Taylor, Charles (1985) Human Agency and Language: Philosophical Papers 1, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Tenenbaum, Sergio (2021) “The Guise of the Good,” in Chang, Ruth and Sylvan, Kurt (eds.), The Routledge Handbook of Practical Reasons, London: Routledge, 226–36.Google Scholar
Tennemann, Wilhelm G. (1798–1819) Geschichte der Philosophie, 11 vols., Leipzig: Barth.Google Scholar
Theunissen, Michael (2005) Kierkegaard’s Concept of Despair, translated by Harshav, Barbara and Illbruck, Helmut, Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Thomas, John H. (1980) “Paradox,” in Thulstrup, Niels and Thulstrup, Maria Mikulová (eds.), Concepts and Alternatives in Kierkegaard, Copenhagen: Reitzel (Biblioteca Kierkegaardiana, vol. iii), 192–219.Google Scholar
Thompson, Curtis (2009) “Gotthold Ephraim Lessing: Appropriating the Testimony of a Theological Naturalist,” in Stewart, Jon (ed.), Kierkegaard and the Renaissance and Modern Traditions: Philosophy, Farnham, UK: Ashgate (Kierkegaard Research: Sources, Reception and Resources, vol. v, tome i), 77–112.Google Scholar
Thuborg, Anders (1951) Den Kantiske periode i dansk filosofi, 1790–1800, Copenhagen: Gyldendal.Google Scholar
Tilley, Michael (2015) “Prolegomena for Thinking of Kierkegaard as a Social and Political Philosopher,” in Stewart, Jon (ed.), A Companion to Kierkegaard, Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell (Blackwell Companions to Philosophy, vol. lviii), 480–9.Google Scholar
Timmermann, Jens (2013) “Divine Existence and Moral Motivation,” in Bacin, Stefano, Ferrarin, Alfredo, La Rocca, Claudio, and Ruffing, Margit (eds.), Kant und die Philosophie in weltbürgerlicher Absicht, vol. i, Berlin: de Gruyter, 669–78.Google Scholar
Tjønneland, Eivind (2004) Ironie als Symphom: Eine kritische Auseinandersetzung mit Søren Kierkegaards Über den Begriff der Ironie, Bern: Peter Lang (Texte und Untersuchungen zur Germanistik und Skandinavistik, vol. liv).Google Scholar
Toner, Christoph (2017) “Virtue Ethics and Egoism,” in Besser-Jones, Lorraine and Slote, Michael (eds.), The Routledge Companion to Virtue Ethics, London: Routledge (Routledge Philosophy Companions), 345–57.Google Scholar
Tudvad, Peter (2010) Stadier på antisemitismens vej: Søren Kierkegaard og jøderne, Copenhagen: Rosinante.Google Scholar
Tudvad, Peter (2013) “Henrik Pontoppidan: Inspiration and Hesitation,” in Stewart, Jon (ed.), Kierkegaard’s Influence on Literature and Criticism: Denmark, Aldershot, UK: Ashgate (Kierkegaard Research: Sources, Reception and Resources, vol. xii, tome ii), 137–65.Google Scholar
Tullberg, Steen (2006) Søren Kierkegaard i Danmark: En receptionshistorie, Copenhagen: Reitzel.Google Scholar
Verheyden, Jack (2000) “The Ethical and the Religious as Law and Gospel,” in Phillips, Dewi Z. and Tessin, Timothy (eds.), Kant and Kierkegaard on Religion, Basingstoke, UK: Macmillan and New York: St. Martin’s Press (Claremont Studies in the Philosophy of Religion), 153–77.Google Scholar
Verstrynge, Karl (2004) “The Perfection of the Kierkegaardian Self in Regulative Perspective,” Kierkegaard Studies Yearbook 9: 473–95.Google Scholar
Vos, Pieter H. (2016) “‘A Human Being’s Highest Perfection’: The Grammar and Vocabulary of Virtue in Kierkegaard’s Upbuilding Discourses,” Faith and Philosophy 33: 311–32.Google Scholar
Wahlberg, Mats (2020) “Divine Revelation,” in Zalta, Edward (ed.), The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, accessed March 19, 2021, https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/fall2020/entries/divine-revelation/.Google Scholar
Walker, Jeremy (1972) To Will One Thing: Reflections on Kierkegaard’s Purity of Heart, Montreal: McGill-Queen’s University Press.Google Scholar
Webb, Carson (2017) “Kierkegaard’s Critique of Eudaimonism: A Reassessment,” Journal of Religious Ethics 45: 437–62.Google Scholar
Wedgewood, Ralph (2008) “Butler on Virtue, Self-Interest, and Human Nature,” in Bloomfield, Paul (ed.), Morality and Self-Interest, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 177–204.Google Scholar
Welz, Claudia (2008) Love’s Transcendence and the Problem of Theodicy, Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck (Religion in Philosophy and Theology, vol. xxx).Google Scholar
Welz, Claudia (2013) “Kierkegaard and Phenomenology,” in Lippitt, John and Pattison, George (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Kierkegaard, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 440–63.Google Scholar
Welz, Claudia (2016) Humanity in God’s Image: An Interdisciplinary Exploration, Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Welz, Claudia (2019) “Conscience, Self-Deception, and the Question of Authenticity in Kierkegaard,” in Stokes, Patrick, Helms, Eleanor, and Buben, Adam (eds.), The Kierkegaardian Mind, London: Routledge (Routledge Philosophical Minds), 281–92.Google Scholar
Westphal, Merold (1991) Kierkegaard’s Critique of Reason and Society, University Park, PA: Pennsylvania State University Press.Google Scholar
Westphal, Merold (1996) Becoming a Self: A Reading of Kierkegaard’s Concluding Unscientific Postscript, West Lafayette, IN: Purdue University Press.Google Scholar
Westphal, Merold (1998) “Kierkegaard and Hegel,” in Hannay, Alastair and Marino, Gordon (eds.), The Cambridge Companion to Kierkegaard, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press (Cambridge Companions), 101–24.Google Scholar
Westphal, Merold (2012) “Climacus on Subjectivity and the System,” in Furtak, Rick Anthony (ed.), Kierkegaard’s Concluding Unscientific Postscript: A Critical Guide, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press (Cambridge Critical Guides), 132–48.Google Scholar
Westphal, Merold (2014) Kierkegaard’s Concept of Faith, Grand Rapids, MI: Eerdmans (Kierkegaard as a Christian Thinker).Google Scholar
Westphal, Merold (2018) “Reply to Eleanor Helms on Faith versus Reason in Kierkegaard,” Faith and Philosophy 35: 367–72.Google Scholar
Wietzke, Walter (2011) “Kierkegaard’s Constitutivism: Agency, the Stages of Existence and the Issue of Motivation,” Kierkegaard Studies Yearbook 16: 411–32.Google Scholar
Williams, Bernard (2004) Truth and Truthfulness: An Essay in Genealogy, Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Wimmer, Reiner (1990) Kants kritische Religionsphilosophie, Berlin: de Gruyter (Kantstudien-Ergänzungshefte, vol. cxxiv).Google Scholar
Winkel Holm, Isak (1998) Tanken i Billedet: Søren Kierkegaards poetik, Copenhagen: Gyldendal.Google Scholar
Wood, Allen (2000) “Religion, Ethical Community and the Struggle against Evil,” Faith and Philosophy 17: 498–511.Google Scholar
Wood, Allen (2019) “Evil in Classic German Philosophy: Selfhood, Deception and Despair,” in Chignell, Andrew (ed.), Evil: A History, Oxford: Oxford University Press (Oxford Philosophical Concepts), 322–49.Google Scholar
Wrathall, Mark A. (2019) “Coming to an Understanding with the Paradox,” in Stokes, Patrick, Helms, Eleanor, and Buben, Adam (eds.), The Kierkegaardian Mind, London: Routledge (Routledge Philosophical Minds), 239–53.Google Scholar
Wyller, Egil A. (1999) Mellom Dürer og Kierkegaard: Moderne europeisk åndsliv, Oslo: Andresen og Butenschøn and Spartacus (Henologisk skriftserie, vol. xi).Google Scholar
Zammito, John H. (2002) Kant, Herder, and the Birth of Anthropology, Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Zimmerman, Michael (2015) “Value and Normativity,” in Hirose, Iwao and Olson, Jonas (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Value Theory, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 13–28.Google Scholar
Zyl, Liezl van (2017) “Eudaimonistic Virtue Ethics,” in Besser-Jones, Lorraine and Slote, Michael (eds.), The Routledge Companion to Virtue Ethics, London: Routledge (Routledge Philosophy Companions), 183–96.Google Scholar