Book contents
- Frontmatter
- Contents
- Notes on contributors
- Acknowledgements
- List of translations and abbreviations
- Introduction
- 1 Kant's Metaphysics of Morals: the history and significance of its deferral
- 2 Reason, desire, and the will
- 3 Justice without virtue
- 4 Kant's innate right as a rational criterion for human rights
- 5 Intelligible possession of objects of choice
- 6 Punishment, retribution, and the coercive enforcement of right
- 7 Moral feelings in the Metaphysics of Morals
- 8 What is the enemy of virtue?
- 9 Freedom, primacy, and perfect duties to oneself
- 10 Duties to and regarding others
- 11 Duties regarding animals
- 12 Kant's Tugendlehre as normative ethics
- Bibliography
- Index
- References
Bibliography
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 10 January 2011
Edited by
Book contents
- Frontmatter
- Contents
- Notes on contributors
- Acknowledgements
- List of translations and abbreviations
- Introduction
- 1 Kant's Metaphysics of Morals: the history and significance of its deferral
- 2 Reason, desire, and the will
- 3 Justice without virtue
- 4 Kant's innate right as a rational criterion for human rights
- 5 Intelligible possession of objects of choice
- 6 Punishment, retribution, and the coercive enforcement of right
- 7 Moral feelings in the Metaphysics of Morals
- 8 What is the enemy of virtue?
- 9 Freedom, primacy, and perfect duties to oneself
- 10 Duties to and regarding others
- 11 Duties regarding animals
- 12 Kant's Tugendlehre as normative ethics
- Bibliography
- Index
- References
Summary
A summary is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- Kant's Metaphysics of MoralsA Critical Guide, pp. 256 - 263Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2010
References
. De Anima, (trans.), in (ed.), The Complete Works of Aristotle, Princeton University Press, 1984, vol. i, 641–92Google Scholar
Nicomachean Ethics, (trans.), in (ed.), The Complete Works of Aristotle, vol. ii, 1729–867
“Kant on Duty to Oneself and Resistance to Political Authority,”Journal of the History of Philosophy 34 (3) (1996), 409–24CrossRefGoogle Scholar
“Tierethik, Tiernatur und Moralanthropologie im Kontext von §17 Tugendlehre,”Kant-Studien 96 (2005), 336–63CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, and . “Beneficence and Other Duties of Love in The Metaphysics of Morals,” in , Jr. (ed.), The Blackwell Guide to Kant's Ethics, Oxford and Malden, Mass.: Wiley-Blackwell, 2009, 211–28Google Scholar
A Commentary on Kant's Critique of Practical Reason, University of Chicago Press, 1960Google Scholar
“Das Erlaubnisgesetz, oder: Vernunft und Geschichte in Kants Rechtslehre,” in R. (ed.), Rechtsphilosophie der Aufklärung: Symposium Wolfenbüttel 1981, Berlin: Walter de Gruyter, 1982, 233–85CrossRefGoogle Scholar
“Das Problem der Erlaubnisgesetze im Spätwerk Kants,” in (ed.), Immanuel Kant: Zum ewigen Frieden, Berlin: Akademie Verlag, 1995, 69–86Google Scholar
Die Entstehung der kritischen Rechtsphilosophie Kants, 1762–1780, Berlin: Walter de Gruyter, 1979CrossRefGoogle Scholar
“Kant's Theory of Punishment: Deterrence in its Threat, Retribution in its Execution,”Law and Philosophy 8 (1989), 151–200CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, and . Kant's Doctrine of Right: A Commentary, Cambridge University Press, 2010CrossRefGoogle Scholar
“Animality and Agency: A Kantian Approach to Abortion,”Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 76 (2008), 117–37CrossRefGoogle Scholar
“Kant on the Wrongness of ‘Unnatural’ Sex,”History of Philosophy Quarterly 16 (2) (1999), 225–48Google Scholar
“Kant's Conception of Duties Regarding Animals: Reconstruction and Reconsideration,”History of Philosophy Quarterly 17 (2000), 405–23Google Scholar
“Kant's Ethics and Duties to Oneself,”Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 78 (1997), 321–48CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moral Self-Regard: Duties to Oneself in Kant's Moral Theory, New York and London: Garland Publishing, 2001Google Scholar
“Moral Dilemmas, Genuine and Spurious: A Comparative Anatomy,”Ethics 104 (1993), 7–21; reprinted in J.E. Malpas (ed.), Philosophical Papers of Alan Donagan, vol. ii, University of Chicago Press, 1994, 153–68CrossRefGoogle Scholar
“The Relation of Moral Theory to Moral Judgment: A Kantian Review,” in (ed.), Moral Theory and Moral Judgments in Medical Ethics, Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers, 1988, 171–92; reprinted in Malpas (ed.), Philosophical Papers of Alan Donagan, vol. ii, 194–216Google Scholar
“Zur Einheit der praktischen Philosophie Kants,”Perspektiven der Philosophie 5 (1979), 5–37CrossRefGoogle Scholar
“The Inner Freedom of Virtue,” in (ed.), Kant's Metaphysics of Morals: Interpretative Essays, Oxford University Press, 2002, 289–315.Google Scholar
“Freedom and Constraint in Kant's Metaphysical Elements of Justice,” in and (eds.), Kant and Law, Hants: Ashgate, 2006, 87–108Google Scholar
“Hobbes and Kant on Public Authority,” Hobbes Studies (in press)
“Ist das rechtliche Postulat ein Postulat der reinen praktischen Vernunft? Zum Endzweck der Kantischen Rechtslehre,”Jahrbuch für Recht und Ethik 12 (2004), 299–330Google Scholar
“Kant's Kingdom of Ends: Metaphysical, Not Political,” in (ed.), Kant's Groundwork of the Metaphysics of Morals: A Critical Guide, Cambridge University Press 2009, 119–39Google Scholar
“Reason, Right, and Revolution: Locke and Kant,”Philosophy and Public Affairs 36 (2008), 375–404CrossRefGoogle Scholar
“Formulations on the Two Principles of Mental Functioning,” in The Case of Schreber, Papers on Technique and Other Works, Standard Edition of the Complete Psychological Works of Sigmund Freud, vol. xii (1911–13), (ed.), London: Hogarth Press, 1958, 218–26Google Scholar
“Formulierungen über die zwei Prinzipien des psychischen Geschehens,” in (ed.), Studienausgabe, 8th edn., Frankfurt am Main: S. Fischer, 1997, vol. iii, 13–24Google Scholar
Laws of Freedom: A Study of Kant's Method of Applying the Categorical Imperative in the Metaphysik der Sitten, Oxford: Basil Blackwell, 1963Google Scholar
“Translator's Note on the Text of the Metaphysics of Morals,” in Immanuel Kant, Practical Philosophy, (ed. and trans.), Cambridge University Press, 1996, 355–59Google Scholar
Kant and the Ethics of Humility: A Story of Dependence, Corruption, and Virtue, Cambridge University Press, 2005CrossRefGoogle Scholar
and G. (eds.). Deutsches Wörterbuch, 33 vols, Munich: Deutscher Taschenbuch Verlag, 1984, vol. xxii.
“Duties Regarding Nature,” in Kant and the Experience of Freedom, 303–34
“The Moral Education Theory of Punishment,”Philosophy and Public Affairs 13 (3) (1984), 208–38Google Scholar
“Making Room for Character,” in Moral Literacy, 1–28.
“Rethinking Kant's Hedonism,” in Moral Literacy, 176–202
. “Donagan's Kant,”Ethics 104 (1993), 22–52; reprinted in Thomas E. Hill, Jr., Respect, Pluralism, and Justice, Oxford University Press, 2000, 119–51CrossRefGoogle Scholar
. “Four Conceptions of Conscience,”Nomos 40 (1998), 13–52; reprinted in Human Welfare and Moral Worth, 277–309Google Scholar
. Human Welfare and Moral Worth: Kantian Perspectives, Oxford University Press, 2002CrossRefGoogle Scholar
. “Meeting Needs and Doing Favors,” in Human Welfare and Moral Worth, 201–44
“Wrongdoing, Desert, and Punishment,” in Human Welfare and Moral Worth, 310–39; originally published as “Kant on Wrongdoing, Desert and Punishment,” Law and Philosophy 18 (1) (1999), 407–75Google Scholar
“Categorical Imperatives of Right According to Ulpian,” in Kant's Cosmopolitan Theory of Law and Peace, (trans.), Cambridge University Press, 2006, 119–33Google Scholar
Categorical Principles of Law: A Counterpoint to Modernity, (trans.), University Park: Pennsylvania State University Press, 2002Google Scholar
“Der kategorishe Rechtsimperativ. ‘Einleitung in die Rechtslehre,’” in (ed.), Immanuel Kant, Metaphysische Anfangsgründe der Rechtslehre, Klassiker Auslegen XIX, Berlin: C.H. Beck-Verlag, 1999, 41–62CrossRefGoogle Scholar
“Kategorische Rechtsimperative nach Ulpian,” in “Königliche Völker”: Zu Kants kosmopolitischer Rechts- und Friedenstheorie, Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp Verlag, 2001, 147–60Google Scholar
Kategorishe Rechtsprinzipien. Ein Kontrapunkt der Moderne, Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp Verlag, 1995Google Scholar
Political Justice: Foundation for a Liberal Philosophy of Law and the State, (trans.), Cambridge: Polity Press, 1995Google Scholar
Politische Gerechtigkeit. Grundlegung einer kritischen Philosophie von Recht und Staat, Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp Verlag, 1987Google Scholar
“The Principle of Justice as Categorical Imperative of Law,” in (ed.), Kant's Practical Philosophy Reconsidered, Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers, 1989, 149–67Google Scholar
“The Permissive Law of Practical Reason in Kant's Metaphysics of Morals,”Law and Philosophy 23 (2004), 45–72Google Scholar
An Essay on the Nature and Conduct of the Passions and Affections, with Illustrations on the Moral Sense, (ed.), Indianapolis, Ind.: Liberty Fund, 2002Google Scholar
“Gibt es eine kritische Ethik und Rechtsphilosophie Kants?”Archiv für Geschichte der Philosophie 63 (1983), 325–45Google Scholar
“Tierseele und tierethische Argumentationen in der Deutschen philosophischen Literatur des 18. Jahrhunderts,”NTM: Internationale Zeitschrift für Geschichte und Ethik der Naturwissenschaften, Technik und Medizin (N.S.) 4 (1996), 103–18CrossRefGoogle Scholar
“Self-Improvement: An Essay in Kantian Ethics,” unpublished manuscript
“Value and Autonomy in Kantian Ethics,” in (ed.), Oxford Studies in Metaethics, vol. ii, Oxford University Press, 2007, 33–48Google Scholar
“Kant's Defense of Human Moral Status,”Journal of the History of Philosophy 47 (2009), 59–102CrossRefGoogle Scholar
“Self-Legislation in Kant's Moral Philosophy,”Archiv für Geschichte der Philosophie 86 (2004), 257–306CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Die Metaphysik der Sitten in zwey Theilen. Erster Teil: Metaphysische Anfangsgründeder Rechtslehre; Zweiter Teil: Metaphysische Anfangsgründe der Tugendlehre, Königsberg: Friedrich Nicolovius, 1797Google Scholar
Groundwork for the Metaphysics of Morals, , Jr. (ed.), (trans.), Oxford University Press, 2002Google Scholar
Metaphysik der Sitten, 2nd edn., (ed.), Leipzig: Verlag der Dürr'schen Buchhandlung, 1907Google Scholar
Metaphysische Anfangsgründe der Rechtslehre: Metaphysik der Sitten, Erster Teil, (ed.), Hamburg: Felix Meiner Verlag, 1986, 1998Google Scholar
Metaphysische Anfangsgründe der Tugendlehre: Metaphysik der Sitten, Zweiter Teil, (ed.), Hamburg: Felix Meiner Verlag, 1990Google Scholar
Vorlesungen zur Moralphilosophie, (ed.), Introduction by M. Kuehn, Berlin: Walter de Gruyter, 2004Google Scholar
Introduction to the Problems of Legal Theory: A Translation of the First Edition of the Reine Rechtslehre or Pure Theory of Law, and (trans.), Oxford University Press, 1997CrossRefGoogle Scholar
“Treating Oneself Merely as a Means,” in (ed.), Kant's Ethics of Virtue, Berlin: Walter de Gruyter, 2008, 201–18Google Scholar
Wohlgeordnete Freiheit, Berlin: Walter de Gruyter, 1984
“Fellow Creatures: Kantian Ethics and Our Duties to Animals,” in (ed.), The Tanner Lectures on Human Values, vol. xxv, Salt Lake City: Utah University Press, 2005, 77–110Google Scholar
“Interacting with Animals: A Kantian Account,” in and (eds.), The Oxford Handbook on Ethics and Animals, Oxford University Press, in press
“Introduction,” in Immanuel Kant, Anthropology from a Pragmatic Point of View, (ed. and trans.), Cambridge University Press, 2006, vii–xxixGoogle Scholar
“Can There Be a Rights-Based Moral Theory?”Midwest Studies in Philosophy 3 (1978), 350–59CrossRefGoogle Scholar
“Kant in the Classroom,” online at www.manchester.edu/kant/
“Reason and Animals: Descartes, Kant, and Mead on the Place of Humans in Nature,” unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Notre Dame (1987)
Frontiers of Justice: Disabilities, Nationality, Species Membership, Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press, 2006Google Scholar
, and (eds.), Vorlesungsverzeichnisse der Universität Königsberg (1720–1804), 2 vols., Stuttgart-Bad Cannstatt: frommann-holzboog, 1999
Constructions of Reason: Explorations of Kant's Practical Philosophy, Cambridge University Press, 1989Google Scholar
“Does Kant Have Two Concepts of Freedom?” in and (eds.), Akten des Vierten Internationalen Kant Kongresses, Berlin: Walter de Gruyter, 1974, 590–96Google Scholar
“Duties to Oneself, Motivational Internalism, and Self-Deception in Kant's Ethics,” in (ed.), Kant's Metaphysics of Morals: Interpretative Essays, Oxford University Press, 2002, 371–89Google Scholar
“Kant on Punishment,” in , Jr. (ed.), The Blackwell Guide to Kant's Ethics, Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell, 2009, 179–95Google Scholar
Lectures on the History of Moral Philosophy, Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press 2000Google Scholar
“Themes in Kant's Moral Philosophy,” in (ed.), Kant's Transcendental Deductions: The Three “Critiques” and the “Opus postumum,”Stanford University Press, 1989, 81–113Google Scholar
Agency and Autonomy in Kant's Moral Theory: Selected Essays, Oxford University Press, 2006CrossRefGoogle Scholar
“Self-Legislation and Duties to Oneself,” in (ed.), Kant's Metaphysics of Morals: Interpretative Essays, Oxford University Press, 2002, 349–70; reprinted in Agency and Autonomy, 231–49Google Scholar
Der Rechtsgedanke nach den frühen Quellen Kants, Frankfurt am Main: Vittorio Klostermann, 1971Google Scholar
Rezension, in Die Ursprünge der Ethik Kants in seinen vorkritischen Schriften und Reflexionen, Meisenheim am Glan: A. Hain, 1961, 365–69Google Scholar
“Dignity and the Formula of Humanity,” in (ed.), Kant's Groundwork of the Metaphysics of Morals: A Critical Guide, Cambridge University Press, 2009, 102–18Google Scholar
Animal Liberation: A New Ethics for Our Treatment of Animals, New York: Random House, 1975Google Scholar
“Kant on Conscience, ‘Indirect’ Duty, and Moral Error,”International Philosophical Quarterly 46 (2006), 293–308CrossRefGoogle Scholar
“Kantian Duties to the Self, Explained and Defended,”Philosophy 81 (2006), 505–29CrossRefGoogle Scholar
“When the Tail Wags the Dog: Animal Welfare and Indirect Duty in Kantian Ethics,”Kantian Review 10 (2005), 128–49CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(ed.). Kant's Metaphysics of Morals: Interpretative Essays, Oxford University Press, 2002
“Kant's Answers to the Casuistical Questions Concerning Self-Disembodiment,”Kant-Studien 94 (2003), 454–73CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, , and . “International Kant Interview, 2004–2005,” online at www.philos.msu.ru/community/staff/vasiliev/Kant_Interview/Kant_Interview.htm
“Einleitung,” in Immanuel Kant, Metaphysik der Sitten, 2nd edn., Leipzig: Verlag der Dürr'schen Buchhandlung, 1907, ix–li
“Zulassung,” in (ed.), Philosophisches Lexicon, 4th edn. [1775], Hildesheim: Olms, reprint 1968, vol. ii, col. 1708Google Scholar
Moral Status: Obligation to Persons and Other Living Things, Oxford University Press, 1997Google Scholar
“Do Kant's Principles Justify Property or Usufruct?”Jahrbuch für Recht und Ethik 5 (1997), 142–94Google Scholar
“Which Imperatives for Right? On the Non-Prescriptive Character of Juridical Law in Kant's Metaphysics of Morals,” in (ed.), Kant's Metaphysics of Morals: Interpretative Essays, Oxford University Press, 2002, 65–87Google Scholar
“Why the Doctrine of Right Does Not Belong in the Metaphysics of Morals,”Jahrbuch für Recht und Ethik 5 (1997), 205–27Google Scholar
“The Final Form of Kant's Practical Philosophy,” in (ed.), Kant's Metaphysics of Morals: Interpretative Essays, Oxford University Press, 2002, 1–21Google Scholar
“General Introduction,” in (ed. and trans.), Immanuel Kant, Practical Philosophy, Cambridge University Press, 1996, xiii–xxxiiiGoogle Scholar
“Kant on Duties Regarding Nonrational Nature I,”Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society, Supplementary Volumes 72 (1998), 189–210CrossRefGoogle Scholar