Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-gb8f7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-23T12:13:56.819Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

11 - Trials by Peers

The Ebb and Flow of the Criminal Jury in France and Belgium

from Part III - Challenges to Lay Participation in Law

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  03 August 2021

Sanja Kutnjak Ivković
Affiliation:
Michigan State University
Shari Seidman Diamond
Affiliation:
Northwestern University, Illinois
Valerie P. Hans
Affiliation:
Cornell University, New York
Nancy S. Marder
Affiliation:
Chicago-Kent College of Law
Get access

Summary

This chapter provides historical and contemporary perspectives on two long-standing systems of trial by jury in France and in Belgium. It begins with a brief history of the French criminal jury and describes its recent reforms, including a significant pilot program that extended lay participation. This chapter then turns to the history of the Belgian criminal jury, recent reforms which almost abolished it, and countervailing forces to resurrect and strengthen the jury. It explores how political and economic struggles in both countries have influenced the ebb and flow of lay citizen participation, combined with underlying tension between professional judges and lay citizen judges. The chapter concludes with observations about the future for lay participation in these two countries.

Type
Chapter
Information
Juries, Lay Judges, and Mixed Courts
A Global Perspective
, pp. 218 - 236
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2021

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

A quoi sert le juge d’instruction? [What is the purpose of the investigating judge?] (2012, August 31). www.vie-publique.fr/decouverte-institutions/justice/fonctionnement/justice-penale/quoi-sert-juge-instruction.htmlGoogle Scholar
Arrêté du 18 mars 2013 mettant fin à l’expérimentation des dispositions prévoyant la participation de citoyens assesseurs au fonctionnement de la justice pénale [Order of 18 March 2013 ending the experimentation of the provisions providing for the participation of citizen assessors in the functioning of the criminal justice system], March. 22, 2013, Journal Officiel de la République Française [Official Gazette of France], p. 4897.Google Scholar
Aubert, J. L., & Savaux, E. (2012). Introduction au droit [Introduction to law]. 14th ed. Paris: Sirey.Google Scholar
Benoit Frydman sur la réforme de la cour d’assises [Benoit Frydman on the reform of the assises court]. (2018, January 10). Vivreici.be. www.vivreici.be/commune/5000/les-gens-d-ici/detail_benoit-frydman-sur-la-reforme-de-la-cour-d-039-assises-10–01-2018?videoId=90318Google Scholar
Brafman, J. (2012, April 9). Justice: Nicolas Sarkozy table sur l’appel au peuple [Justice: Nicolas Sarkozy is counting on the call to the people]. Slate. www.slate.fr/story/52901/justice-sarkozy-programmeGoogle Scholar
Centre Permanent pour la Citoyenneté et la Participation [Permanent Center for Citizenship and Participation (Belg.)]. (2016, June). Vers la fin du jury d’assises? [Toward the end of the assises jury?] www.cpcp.be/medias/pdfs/publications/cour_assise.pdfGoogle Scholar
Chambre des représentants de Belgique [Belgian House of Representatives]. (2015). Projet de loi, modifiant le droit pénal et la procédure pénale et portant des dispositions diverses en matière de justice [Legislative bill modifying criminal law and criminal procedure and carrying various provisions in justice matters]. www.dekamer.be/flwb/pdf/54/1418/54K1418001.pdfGoogle Scholar
Code de Procédure Pénale [Criminal Procedure Code], Art. 712–713, al. 2. (Fr.)Google Scholar
Code d’ Instruction Criminelle [Criminal Procedure Code] (Belg.). www.ejustice.just.fgov.be/eli/loi/1808/11/17/1808111701/justelGoogle Scholar
Commission de réforme de la Cour d’assises [Commission on the Reform of the Assises Court (Belg.)]. (2005). Rapport définitif de la « Commission de réforme de la Cour d’assises » remis à madame la Ministre de la Justice le 23 décembre 2005 [Final report of the reform Commission of the Cour d’assises presented to Madam Minister of Justice, December 23, 2005]. www.philodroit.be/IMG/pdf/B._FRYDMAN_R._VERSTRAETEN_-_Rapport_definitif_de_la_Commission_de_reforme_de_la_Cour_d_assises.pdfGoogle Scholar
Conseil constitutionnel [Constitutional Court] Decision No. 2011–625 DC, Mar. 10, 2011, Rec. 122 (Fr.).Google Scholar
Conseil constitutionnelDecision No. 2017–694 QPC, Mar. 2, 2018 (Fr.).Google Scholar
Constitution (Belg.) (2007).Google Scholar
Cour constitutionelle [Constitutional Court] decision no 148/2017, Dec. 21, 2017, www.const-court.be/public/f/2017/2017-148f.pdf (Belg.)Google Scholar
De Charette, L. (2010, December 2). Les jurés siégeront en cours d’appel [Jurors will sit on courts of appeal]. Le Figaro. www.lefigaro.fr/actualite-france/2010/12/02/01016-20101202ARTFIG00729-les-jures-siegeront-en-cours-d-appel.phpGoogle Scholar
Direction de l’information légale et administrative (Premier ministre), Ministère chargé de la justice [Directorate of Legal and Administrative Information (Prime Minister), Ministry of Justice (Fr.)] (2018). Déroulement d’un procès devant la cour d’assises [Trial proceedings before the assises court]. www.service-public.fr/particuliers/vosdroits/F1487Google Scholar
Durançon, D. (2015). La Cour d’assises: Une juridiction séculaire et atypique en perpétuelle quête de renovation [The Assises Court: A secular and atypical jurisdiction, permanently looking for renovation]. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Paris-Saclay.Google Scholar
Echevinage. Etudes Générales [Echevinage. General studies]. (2014). In Bibliographie de l’Histoire de la Justice Francaise (1789–2011) [Bibliography of the History of French Justice (1789–2011)]. https://criminocorpus.org/fr/outils/bibliographie/consultation/themes/13483Google Scholar
Egré, P., & Raisse, T. (2016, March 14). Délais d’audiencement: Les assises attendent le verdict [Court hearings delays: the assises courts are waiting for the verdict]. Le Parisien. www.leparisien.fr/espace-premium/actu/les-assises-attendent-le-verdict-14-03-2016-5623943.phpGoogle Scholar
Faure, S. (2011, July 7). La loi sur les jurés populaires est paradoxale du point de vue de l’histoire [The law on popular juries is a paradox from the standpoint of history]. Liberation. www.liberation.fr/societe/2011/07/07/la-loi-sur-les-jures-populaires-est-paradoxale-du-point-de-vue-de-l-histoire_747679Google Scholar
Garapon, A., & Papadopoulos, I. (2003). Juger en Amérique et en France [To judge in America and in France]. Paris: Odile Jacobs.Google Scholar
Geens, K. (2016). Correctionnalisation [Correctionalization]. www.koengeens.be/fr/policy/1-correctionaliseringGoogle Scholar
Geens, K.(2017, September 22). Assises « Trois juges et quatre jurés » [Assises courts: “Three judges and four jurors”]. https://jubel.be/fr/assises-trois-juges-et-quatre-juresGoogle Scholar
Germain, C. M. (2014, June). The rise and fall of lay participation in French criminal courts [Paper presentation]. 2014 Conference on Juries and Mixed Tribunals Across the Globe: New Developments, Common Challenges and Future Directions, Oñati, Spain.Google Scholar
Germain, C. M.(2017, Winter). Lay participation in the criminal jury: France and Belgium. RCSL Newsletter, 79. http://rcsl.iscte.pt/rcsl_nl_2017_1_.pdfGoogle Scholar
Goffinon, J. (2011). Le jury populaire: Véritable juge ou simple expression de la démocratie [The popular jury: Real judge or simple expression of democracy]. www.philodroit.be/IMG/pdf/colloqueliegetexte.pdfGoogle Scholar
Hans, V. P., & Germain, C. M. (2011). The French jury at a crossroads. Chicago-Kent Law Review, 86, 737768.Google Scholar
Huyghe, M. S. (2011, June 15). Rapport fait au nom de la commission des lois constitutionnelles, de la législation et de l’administration générale de la république sur le projet de loi (No. 3452), adopté par le sénat après engagement de la procédure accélérée sur la participation des citoyens au fonctionnement de la justice pénale et le jugement des mineurs [Report written in the name of the commission of constitutional laws, of legislation and of the general administration of the republic on the legislative bill (No. 3452) adopted by the senate after the fast-track procedure on the participation of citizens to the functioning of criminal justice and judgment of minors]. Assemblée nationale. www.assemblee-nationale.fr/13/rapports/r3532.aspGoogle Scholar
Jacquin, J. B. (2018, March 9). Nicole Belloubet veut un « tribunal criminel » à la place des assises [Nicole Belloubet wants a “criminal tribunal,” instead of the assises court]. Le Monde. www.lemonde.fr/police-justice/article/2018/03/09/un-tribunal-criminel-a-la-place-des-assises_5268210_1653578.htmlGoogle Scholar
Lederman, C. (1997). Jures d’assises et magistrats [Assises jurors and judges]. Regards.fr. http://www.regards.fr/archives/archives-web/jures-d-assises-et-magistrats,382Google Scholar
Loi 2000–516 du 15 juin 2000 renforçant la protection de la présomption d’innocence et les droits des victims [Law 2000–516 of June 15, 2000, on strengthening the protection of the presumption of innocence and the rights of victims]. Journal Officiel de la République Française [Official Gazette of France], June 16, 2000, p. 9038.Google Scholar
Loi 2011–939 du 10 août 2011 sur la participation des citoyens au fonctionnement de la justice pénale et le jugement des mineurs [Law 2011–939 of August 10, 2011, on the participation of citizens in the functioning of criminal justice and the adjudication of minors]. Journal Officiel de la République Française [Official Gazette of France], August 11, 2011, p. 13744.Google Scholar
Loi 2014–535 du 27 mai 2014 portant transposition de la directive 2012/13/UE du Parlement européen et du Conseil, du 22 mai 2012, relative au droit à l’information dans le cadre des procédures pénales [Law 2014–535 of May 27, 2014, transposing Directive 2012/13/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council of May 22, 2012, on the right to information in criminal proceedings]. Journal Officiel de la République Française [Official Gazette of France], May 28, 2014, p. 8864.Google Scholar
Loi 2016–731 du 3 juin 2016 renforçant la lutte contre le crime organisé, le terrorisme et leur financement, et améliorant l’efficacité et les garanties de la procédure pénale [Law 2016–731 of June 3, 2016, strengthening the fight against organized crime, terrorism and their financing, and improving the effectiveness and guarantees of criminal proceedings]. Journal Officiel de la République Française [Official Gazette of France], June 4, 2016. www.legifrance.gouv.fr/affichTexte.do?cidTexte=JORFTEXT000032627231&categorieLien=idGoogle Scholar
Loi 2019–222 du 23 mars 2019 de programmation 2018–2022 et de réforme pour la justice [Law No. 2019–222 of March 23, 2019, planning for 2018–2022 and justice reform]. Journal Officiel de la République Française [Official Gazette of France]. www.legifrance.gouv.fr/affichTexte.do?cidTexte=JORFTEXT000038261631&categorieLien=idCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Loi du 7 mai 1999 modification à la constitution [Law of May 7, 1999, on modifying the Constitution]. Moniteur Belge [Official Gazette of Belgium], May 29, 1999, p. 19310.Google Scholar
Loi du 25 novembre 1941 sur le jury [Law of November 25, 1941, on the jury]. Journal Officiel de la République Française [Official Gazette of France], December 12, 1941, p. 5355.Google Scholar
Loi modifiant le droit pénal et la procédure pénale et portant des dispositions diverses en matière de justice [Law amending criminal law and criminal procedure and providing miscellaneous provisions on justice], February 5, 2016. Moniteur Belge [Official Gazette of Belgium], Feb. 19, 2016, p. 13130.Google Scholar
Ministère de la Justice [Ministry of Justice (Fr.)]. (2011–2012). Statistiques pénales [Criminal statistics]. Paris.Google Scholar
Ministère de la Justice(2013, March 1). L’expérimentation des citoyens assesseurs évaluée [The experiment of citizen assessors as judges assessed]. www.justice.gouv.fr/la-garde-des-sceaux-10016/archives-2013-c-taubira-12869/lexperimentation-des-citoyens-assesseurs-evaluee-30038.htmlGoogle Scholar
Ministère de la Justice(2016). Les chiffres-clés de la Justice 2016 [Justice 2016 key numbers]. Secrétariat general, Service support et moyens du ministère, Sous-direction de la Statistique et des Études. www.justice.gouv.fr/art_pix/stat_CC%202016.pdfGoogle Scholar
Neuer, L. (2012, May 5). “Jurés Populaires” en correctionnelle: Premier bilan en demi teinte [“Popular juries” in the criminal tribunal: First mixed assessment]. Le Point. www.lepoint.fr/chroniqueurs-du-point/laurence-neuer/jures-populaires-en-correctionnelle-premier-bilan-en-demi-teinte-05–05-2012–1458403_56.phpGoogle Scholar
Ordre des barreaux Francophones et Germanophones de Belgique [Belgian Bar Association for French and German speakers]. Pot-Pourri II. (2016, September 8). La Tribune. http://us2.campaign-archive2.com/?u=d552fd66716b81b8fb8f922cc&id=c62332842cGoogle Scholar
Pradel, J. (2001). L’appel contre les arrêts d’assises: un apport heureux de la loi du 15 juin 2000 [Appeal against assises verdicts: A welcome contribution of the law of June 15, 2000]. Recueil Dalloz, 1964–1972.Google Scholar
Pradel, J.(2010). Procédure pénale [Criminal procedure]. Recueil Dalloz, 34, 22542263.Google Scholar
Pradel, J.(2011a). La Cour de Strasbourg n’impose finalement qu’une motivation minimale aux cours d’assises statuant avec des jurés [The Strasbourg Court finally only imposes a minimal ground for decision requirement to the assises court sitting with jurors]. Recueil Dalloz, 1, 4850.Google Scholar
Pradel, J.(2011b, September 5). Le citoyen comme juge pénal: A propos de la loi de 10 août 2011 [The citizen as criminal judge: About the law of August 10, 2011]. La Semaine Juridique – Edition générale, 1534.Google Scholar
Pradel, J.(2018, April 2) Plaidoyer pour la création d’un tribunal criminel sans jurés [Plea for the creation of a criminal tribunal without any jurors]. Semaine Juridique – Edition Générale, 377.Google Scholar
Rastello, C. (2012, January 4). Jurés populaires en correctionnelle: une fausse bonne idée? [Popular juries in the criminal tribunal: a false good idea?] L’Obs. www.nouvelobs.com/societe/20120102.OBS7867/jures-populaires-en-correctionnelle-une-fausse-bonne-idee.htmlGoogle Scholar
Reasonable doubt (n.d.). In Black’s Law Dictionary. 2nd ed. https://thelawdictionary.org/reasonable-doubtGoogle Scholar
Redon, M. (2013). Cour d’assises: Un répertoire de droit pénal et procédure pénale [The Assise Court: A directory of criminal law and criminal procedure]. Paris: Dalloz.Google Scholar
Réju, E. (2012, January 1). Associer les citoyens, c’est faire oeuvre de pédagogie [To involve the citizens is a pedagogical endeavor]. La Croix. www.la-croix.com/Actualite/S-informer/France/Associer-les-citoyens-c-est-faire-aeuvre-de-pedagogie-_EP_-2012-01-01-752937Google Scholar
Salas, D. (2001). Juger en démocratie [To judge in a democracy]. In La Cour d’assises: Bilan d’un héritage démocratique [The Assises Court: State of a democratic heritage] (pp. 721). Paris: La Documentation française.Google Scholar
Salvat, X., & Boccon-Gibod, D. (2013, February). L’expérimentation des citoyens assesseurs dans les resorts des cours d’appel de Dijon et Toulouse [The experiment of the citizen assessors in the courts of appeals of Dijon and Toulouse]. www.ladocumentationfrancaise.fr/var/storage/rapports-publics/134000144/0000.pdfGoogle Scholar
Sénat [Senate (Fr.)] (2011). Etude d’Impact: Projet de loi sur la participation des citoyens au fonctionnement de la justice pénale et le jugement des mineurs [Impact Study: Legislative bill on the participation of citizens in the functioning of criminal justice and the judgment of minors]. www.senat.fr/leg/etudes-impact/pjl10-438-ei/pjl10-438-ei.pdfGoogle Scholar
Taxquet v. Belgique [G.C.], 2010-VI Eur. Ct. H.R. 105.Google Scholar
Vansiliette, F. (2016, September 30). La Cour d’Assises: vers une lente agonie? [The Assises Court: Toward a slow agony?]. Justice en Ligne. www.justice-en-ligne.be/article919.htmlGoogle Scholar
Wauters, L. (2016, October 8). Koen Geens veut résusciter les Assises [Koen Geens wants to resurrect the assises courts]. www.koengeens.be/fr/news/2016/10/08/koen-geens-veut-ressusciter-les-assisesGoogle Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure [email protected] is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×