Adams, J. N. 1982. The Latin Sexual Vocabulary. Baltimore.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Adcock, F. E. 1956. Caesar as Man of Letters. Cambridge.Google Scholar

Alexander, M. 1990. Trials in the Late Roman Republic, 149 BC to 50 BC. Toronto.Google Scholar

Alexander, M. 2002. The Case for the Prosecution in the Ciceronian Era. Ann Arbor.Google Scholar

Alföldi, A. 1985. Caesar in 44 v. Chr. Vol. 1: Studien zu Caesars Monarchie und ihren Wurzeln. Bonn.Google Scholar

Amsterdam, A. G., and Bruner, J.. 2000. Minding the Law. Cambridge and London.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Anderson, R. D., Parsons, P. J., and Nisbet, R. G. M.. 1979. “Elegiacs by Gallus from Qasr Ibrîm.” JRS 69: 125–155.Google Scholar

Andreau, J. 1999. Banking and Business in the Roman World. Cambridge.Google Scholar

Angius, A. 2014. “Le fonti dell’opinione pubblica nella tarda Repubblica Romana.” Diss. U. Roma III.Google Scholar

Angius, A. 2015. “Graffiti e pamphlet. Lessico e sociologia di un fenomeno politico.” BIDR 109: 247–277.Google Scholar

Angius, A. 2018. La Repubblica delle opinioni. Informazione politica e partecipazione popolare a Roma tra II e I secolo a. C. Milan.Google Scholar

Arena, V. 2012. Libertas and the Practice of Politics in the Late Roman Republic. Cambridge.Google Scholar

Ashrafian, H., and Galassi, F. M.. 2016. Julius Caesar’s Disease: A New Diagnosis. South Yorkshire.Google Scholar

Astin, A. E. 1958. The lex annalis before Sulla. Coll. Latomus 32. Brussels.Google Scholar

Astin, A. E 1967. Scipio Aemilianus. Oxford.Google Scholar

Atkins, J. W. 2013. Cicero on Politics and the Limits of Reason: The Republic and Laws. Cambridge.Google Scholar

Austin, R. G. 1960. Cicero: Pro M. Caelio Oratio. 3rd ed. Oxford.Google Scholar

Axelrod, R. 1984. The Evolution of Cooperation. New York.Google Scholar

Badian, E. 1959. “The Early Career of A. Gabinius (cos. 58 BC).” Philologus 103: 87–99.Google Scholar

Badian, E. 1964. Studies in Greek and Roman History. Oxford.Google Scholar

Badian, E. 1968. Roman Imperialism in the Late Republic. Ithaca.Google Scholar

Badian, E. 1972. “Tiberius Gracchus and the Roman Revolution.” ANRW 1.1: 668–731.Google Scholar

Badian, E. 1974. “The Attempt to Try Caesar.” In Evans, J. A. S (ed.), Polis and imperium. Studies in Honour of Edward Togo Salmon. Amsterdam. 145–166.Google Scholar

Badian, E. 1977. “Mamurra’s Fourth Fortune.” CPh 72: 320–322.Google Scholar

Badian, E. 1990. Rev. of Meier, Caesar. Gnomon 62: 22–39.Google Scholar

Badian, E. 2009. “From the Iulii to Caesar.” In Griffin, M. T. (ed.), A Companion to Julius Caesar. Malden, MA, and Oxford. 11–22.Google Scholar

Baehr, P. 1998. Caesar and the Fading of the Roman World: A Study in Republicanism and Caesarism. New Brunswick and London.Google Scholar

Balsdon, J. P. V. D. 1939. “Consular Provinces under the Late Republic – II. Caesar’s Gallic Command.” JRS 29: 167–183.Google Scholar

Balsdon, J. P. V. D. 1962. “Roman History, 65–50 B.C.: Five Problems.” JRS 52: 134–141.Google Scholar

Balsdon, J. P. V. D. 1967. Rev. of Dobesch, Caesars Apotheose. Gnomon 39: 150–156.Google Scholar

Balsdon, J. P. V. D. 1967a. Julius Caesar: A Political Biography. New York.Google Scholar

Bardt, C. 1910. “Die Übergabe des Schwertes an Pompeius im December 50 v. Chr.” Hermes 45: 337–346.Google Scholar

Barwick, K. 1938. Caesars Commentarii und das Corpus Caesarianum. Mainz.Google Scholar

Bastien, J.-L. 2007. Le triomphe romain et son utilisation politique à Rome aux trois derniers siècles de la république. Rome.Google Scholar

Batstone, W. 1991. “A Narrative Gestalt and the Force of Caesar’s Style.” Mnemosyne 44: 126–136.Google Scholar

Batstone, W., and Damon, C.. 2006. Caesar’s Civil War. Oxford.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bauman, R. A. 1963. A Study of the Crimen Maiestatis Imminutae in the Roman Republic. Johannesburg.Google Scholar

Beagon, M. 2005. The Elder Pliny on the Human Animal. Natural History Book 7. Oxford.Google Scholar

Beard, M. 2007. The Roman Triumph. Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar

Beard, M., and Crawford., M. 1985. Rome in the Late Republic: Problems and Interpretations. London. 2nd ed. 1999.Google Scholar

Beard, M., North, J., and Price, S.. 1998. Religions of Rome. 2 vols. Cambridge.Google Scholar

Bearzot, C. 2000. “Cesare e Corinto.” In Urso, G (ed.), L’ultimo Cesare. Rome. 35–53.Google Scholar

Beck, H. 2005. Karriere und Hierarchie. Die römische Aristokratie und die Anfänge des cursus honorum in der mittleren Republik. Berlin.Google Scholar

Beck, H., Duplá, A., Jehne, M., and Pina Polo, F. (eds.) 2011. Consuls and Res Publica. Cambridge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bellemore, J. 2005. “Cato’s Opposition to Caesar in 59 B.C.” In Welch, K and Hillard, T (eds.), Roman Crossings. Swansea. 225–257.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Beneker, J. 2011. “The Crossing of the Rubicon and the Outbreak of Civil War in Cicero, Lucan, Plutarch, and Suetonius.” Phoenix 65: 74–99.Google Scholar

Bennett, C. 2003–2012. “Roman Dates.” www.instonebrewer.com/TyndaleSites/Egypt/ptolemies/chron/roman/roman_civil.htm. [Accessed February 13, 2021.]Google Scholar

Bennett, M. 2006. Oliver Cromwell. London and New York.Google Scholar

Bennett, W. L., and Feldman, M. S.. 1981. Reconstructing Reality in the Courtroom: Justice and Judgment in American Culture. New Brunswick.Google Scholar

Bergmann, B. 2010. Der Kranz des Kaisers. Genese und Bedeutung einer römischen Insignie. Berlin and New York.Google Scholar

Bernstein, F. 1998. Ludi publici. Untersuchungen zur Entstehung und Entwicklung der öffentlichen Spiele im republikanischen Rom. Historia Einzelschriften 119. Stuttgart.Google Scholar

Berry, D. H. 1996. Cicero: Pro P. Sulla Oratio. Cambridge.Google Scholar

Bicknell, P., and Nielsen., D 1998. “Five Cohorts against the World.” In Deroux, C (ed.), Studies in Latin Literature and Roman History IX. Collection Latomus 244. Brussels. 138–166.Google Scholar

Billows, R. 2009. Julius Caesar: The Colossus of Rome. London.Google Scholar

Binmore, K. 2015. “Why All the Fuss? The Many Aspects of the Prisoner’s Dilemma.” In Peterson, M (ed.), The Prisoner’s Dilemma. Cambridge. 16–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bleicken, J. 1998. “Gedanken zum Untergang der römischen Republik.” Gesammelte Schriften 2 (Stuttgart): 683–704.Google Scholar

Blom, H. van der. 2016. Oratory and Political Career in the Late Roman Republic. Cambridge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Blom, H. van der, Gray, C., and Steel, C. (eds.) 2018. Institutions and Ideology in Republican Rome: Speech, Audience and Decision. Cambridge.Google Scholar

Blösel, W. 2016. “Provincial Commands and Money in the Late Roman Republic.” In Beck, H., Jehne, M., and Serrati, J. (eds.), Money and Power in the Roman Republic. Coll. Latomus v. 355. Brussels. 68–81.Google Scholar

Bömer, F. 1953. “Der Commentarius: Zur Vorgeschichte und literarischen Form der Schriften Caesars.” Hermes 81: 210–250.Google Scholar

Bonnefond-Coudry, M. 1989. Le sénat de la République romaine de la guerre d’Hannibal à Auguste. Pratiques délibératives et prise de décision. Rome.Google Scholar

Bosworth, A. B. 1972. “Asinius Pollio and Augustus.” Historia 21: 441–473.Google Scholar

Botermann, H. 1989. “Cato und die sogenannte Schwertübergabe im Dezember 50 v. Chr. Ein übersehenes Zeugnis für die Vorgeschichte des Bürgerkrieges (Sen. ep. mor. 14, 12 f.; 95.69 f; 104, 29–33).” Hermes 117: 62–85.Google Scholar

Botermann, H. 1989a. “Denkmodelle am Vorabend des Bürgerkrieges (Cic. Att. 7.9): Handelsspielraum oder unausweichliche Notwendigkeit?” Historia 38: 410–430.Google Scholar

Bourdieu, P., and Wacquant, L. J. D.. 2002. An Invitation to Reflexive Sociology. Cambridge.Google Scholar

Braund, S. M. 2009. Seneca, de Clementia. Oxford.Google Scholar

Braund, S. M. 2012. “The Anger of Tyrants and the Forgiveness of Kings.” In Griswold, C. L. and Konstan, D. (eds.), Ancient Forgiveness: Classical, Judaic, and Christian. Cambridge. 79–96.Google Scholar

Brennan, T. C. 2000. The Praetorship in the Roman Republic. 2 vols. Oxford.Google Scholar

Brind’Amour, P. 1983. Le Calendrier Romain. Recherches Chronologiques. Ottawa.Google Scholar

Briscoe, J. 2008. A Commentary on Livy, Books 38–40. Oxford.Google Scholar

Brooks, P., and Gewirtz, P. D.. 1996. Law’s Stories: Narrative and Rhetoric in the Law. New Haven.Google Scholar

Broughton, T. R. S. 1946. “Notes on Roman Magistrates.” TAPhA 77: 35–43.Google Scholar

Broughton, T. R. S. 1948. “More Notes on Roman Magistrates.” TAPhA 79: 63–78.Google Scholar

Broughton, T. R. S. 1991. “Candidates Defeated in Roman Elections: Some Ancient Roman ‘Also Rans.’” Transactions of the American Philosophical Society 81.4.Google Scholar

Bruhns, H. 1978. Caesar und die römische Oberschicht in den Jahren 49–44. Göttingen.Google Scholar

Brunt, P. 1957. “Three Passages from Asconius.” CR 71: 193–195.Google Scholar

Brunt, P. 1971. Social Conflicts in the Roman Republic. London.Google Scholar

Brunt, P. 1971a. Italian Manpower: 225 B.C.–A.D. 14. Oxford.Google Scholar

Brunt, P. 1979. “Laus Imperii.” In Garnsey, P. D. A. and Whittaker (eds.), C. R, Imperialism in the Ancient World. Cambridge. 159–191.Google Scholar

Brunt, P. 1986. “Cicero’s Officium in the Civil War.” JRS 76: 12–32.Google Scholar

Brunt, P. 1988. The Fall of the Roman Republic and Related Essays. Oxford.Google Scholar

Burden-Strevens, C. 2018. “Reconstructing Republican Oratory in Cassius Dio’s Roman History.” In Gray, C., Balbo, A., Marshall, R. M. A., and Steel, C. E. W. (eds.), Reading Republican Oratory: Reconstructions, Contexts, Receptions. Oxford. 111–134.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Butler, H. E., and Cary, M.. 1924. M. Tulli Ciceronis De Provinciis Consularibus Oratio ad Senatum. Oxford.Google Scholar

Butler, H. E., and Cary, M. 1927/1982. Suetonius: Divus Iulius. Oxford.Google Scholar

Buttrey, T. V. 2015. “Caesar at Play: Some Preparations for the Parthian Campaign, 44 BCE.” JAH 3: 220–241.Google Scholar

Cadario, M. 2006. “Le statue di Cesare a Roma tra il 46 e il 44 a.C.: la celebrazione della vittoria e il cofronto con Alessandro e Romolo.” Acme 59: 25–70.Google Scholar

Cairns, F., and Fantham, E. (eds.) 2003. Caesar against Liberty? Papers of the Langford Latin Seminar. Leeds.Google Scholar

Canfora, L. 2007. Julius Caesar: The Life and Times of the People’s Dictator. Berkeley.Google Scholar

Cape, R. 1995. “The Rhetoric of Politics in Cicero’s Fourth Catilinarian.” AJPh 116: 255–277.Google Scholar

Cape, R. 2002. “Cicero’s Consular Speeches.” In May, J. M (ed.), Brill’s Companion to Cicero: Oratory and Rhetoric. Leiden. 113–158.Google Scholar

Carlyle, T. 1911. On Heroes, Hero-Worship and the Heroic in History. Ed. Wherry, by G.. Cambridge.Google Scholar

Carsana, C. 2007. Commento storico al libro II delle Guerre Civili di Appiano (parte I). Pisa.Google Scholar

Carter, J. M. 1991. Julius Caesar: The Civil War, Books I & II. Warminster.Google Scholar

Carter, J. M. 1993. Julius Caesar: The Civil War, Book III. Warminster.Google Scholar

Cavarzere, A. 1994. “Note alla In Pisonem di Cicerone.” MD 33: 157–176.Google Scholar

Chrissanthos, S. 2001. “Caesar and the Mutiny of 47 B.C.” JRS 91: 63–75.Google Scholar

Chrissanthos, S. 2019. The Year of Julius and Caesar: 59 BC and the Transformation of the Roman Republic. Baltimore.Google Scholar

Christ, K. 1974. “Caesar und Ariovistus.” Chiron 4: 251–292.Google Scholar

Christ, K. 1994. Caesar. Annäherungen an einen Diktator. Munich.Google Scholar

Clarendon, Edward Hyde, Earl of, 1857. The Life of Edward, Earl of Clarendon, in Which Is Included a Continuation of His History of the Grand Rebellion. Oxford.Google Scholar

Clark, C. 2013. The Sleepwalkers: How Europe Went to War in 1914. New York.Google Scholar

Coarelli, F. 1992. Il Foro Romano: periodo arcaico. 3rd ed. Rome.Google Scholar

Coarelli, F. 1992a. Il Foro Romano: periodo repubblicano e augusteo. 2nd ed. Rome.Google Scholar

Coarelli, F. 1997. Il Campo Marzio dalle origini alla fine della Repubblica. Rome.Google Scholar

Cole, S. 2013. Cicero and the Rise of Deification at Rome. Cambridge.Google Scholar

Collins, J. H. 1972. “Caesar as Political Propagandist.” ANRW 1. 1: 922–966.Google Scholar

Conroy, J. 2014. Our One Common Country: Abraham Lincoln and the Hampton Roads Peace Conference of 1865. Guildford, CT.Google Scholar

Cornwell, H. 2018. Rev. of Wiseman 2016, Mouritsen 2017, and Haake and Harders (eds.) 2017. JRS 108: 200–202.Google Scholar

Cordier, P. 1994. “M. Caelius Rufus, le préteur récalcitrant.” MEFRA 106: 533–577.Google Scholar

Cornell, T. J. (ed.) 2014. Fragments of the Roman Historians. 3 vols. Oxford.Google Scholar

Costa-García, J. M. 2018. “Rediscovering the Roman Conquest of the North-western Iberian Peninsula.” In Fernández-Götz, M. and Roymans, N. (eds.), Conflict Archaeology: Materialities of Collective Violence from Prehistory to Late Antiquity. London and New York. 141–151.Google Scholar

Courrier, C. 2014. La plèbe de Rome et sa culture (fin de II^e siècle av. J.-C.-fin du I^er siècle ap. J.-C.). Rome.Google Scholar

Courtney, E. 1993. The Fragmentary Latin Poets. Oxford.Google Scholar

Craig, C. 1986. “Cato’s Stoicism and the Understanding of Cicero’s Speech for Murena.” TAPhA 116: 229–239.Google Scholar

Craig, C. 2004. “Audience Expectations, Invective, and Proof.” In Powell, J. and Patterson (eds.), J., Cicero the Advocate. Oxford. 187–213.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Crawford, J. 1994. M. Tullius Cicero, the Fragmentary Speeches. Oxford.Google Scholar

Crawford, M. H. 1976. “Hamlet without the Prince” (rev. of Gruen 1974). JRS 66: 214–217.Google Scholar

Crawford, M. H. 1989. “The lex Iulia Agraria.” Athenaeum 67: 179–190.Google Scholar

Cristofoli, R. 2011. Cicerone e l’ultima vittoria di Cesare. Analisi storica del XIV libro delle Epistole ad Attico. Bari.Google Scholar

Damon, C. 2018. Studies on the text of Caesar’s Bellum civile. New York and Oxford.Google Scholar

Damon, C., and Mackay, C.. 1995. “On the Prosecution of C. Antonius in 76 BC.” Historia 44: 37–55.Google Scholar

David, J.-M. 1992. Le patronat judiciaire au dernier siècle de la république romaine. Rome.Google Scholar

Davies, P. J. E. 2017. Architecture and Politics in Republican Rome. Cambridge.Google Scholar

De Libero, L. 1992. Obstruktion. Politische Praktiken im Senat und in der Volksversammlung der ausgehenden römischen Republik (70–49 v. Chr.), Stuttgart.Google Scholar

De Libero, L. 1998. “Der Raub des Staatsschatzes durch Caesar.” Klio 80: 111–133.Google Scholar

De Ligt, L. 2012. Peasants, Citizens, and Soldiers: Studies in the Demographic History of Roman Italy, 225 BC–AD 100. Cambridge.Google Scholar

De Ligt, L., and Northwood, S. (eds.) 2008. People, Land, and Politics: Demographic Developments and the Transformation of Roman Italy, 300 BC–AD 14. Boston.Google Scholar

Degrassi, A. 1947. Inscriptiones Italiae 13/1: Fasti Consulares et Triumphales. Rome.Google Scholar

Dettenhofer, M. H. 1992. Perdita Iuventus. Zwischen den Generationen von Caesar und Augustus. Munich.Google Scholar

Deutsch, M. E. 1914. “The Year of Caesar’s Birth.” TAPhA 45: 17–28.Google Scholar

Devillers, O., and Sion-Jenkis, K. (eds.) 2012. César sous Auguste. Bordeaux.Google Scholar

Dighton, A. 2017. “Mutatio Vestis: Clothing and Political Protest in the Late Roman Republic.” Phoenix 71: 345–369.Google Scholar

Dobesch, E. 1966. Caesars Apotheose zu Lebzeiten und sein Ringen um den Königstitel. Untersuchungen über Caesars Alleinherrschaft. Vienna.Google Scholar

Dobesch, E. 1980. Die Kelten in Österreich nach den ältesten Berichten der Antike. Vienna.Google Scholar

Dobesch, E. 1994. “Zur Chronologie des Dakerkönigs Burebista.” In Göbl, R. (ed.), Die Hexadrachmenprägung der Gross-Boier. Vienna. 51–68.Google Scholar

Dobesch, E. 1998. “Der Weltreichsgedanke bei Caesar.” In L’ecumenismo politico nella coscienza dell’occidente. Rome. 195–263.Google Scholar

Dobesch, E. 2000. “Caesars monarchische Ideologie.” In Urso, G (ed.), L’ultimo Cesare. Rome. 89–123.Google Scholar

Dobesch, E. 2001. Ausgewählte Schriften. Cologne.Google Scholar

Dowling, M. B. 2006. Clemency and Cruelty in the Roman World. Ann Arbor.Google Scholar

Driediger-Murphy, L. G. 2018. “Falsifying the Auspices in Republican Politics.” In van der Blom, H., Gray, C., and Steel, C. (eds.), Institutions and Ideology in Republican Rome: Speech, Audience and Decision. Cambridge. 183–202.Google Scholar

Driediger-Murphy, L. G. 2019. Roman Republican Augury. Freedom and Control. Oxford.Google Scholar

Drogula, F. 2015. Commanders and Command in the Roman Republic and Early Empire. Chapel Hill.Google Scholar

Drogula, F. 2019. Cato the Younger: Life and Death at the End of the Roman Republic. Oxford.Google Scholar

Drumann, W., and Groebe, P.. 1906. Geschichte Roms in seinem Übergange von der republikanischen zur monarchischen Verfassung. Vol. 3. Leipzig.Google Scholar

Drummond, A. 1978. “Some Observations on the Order of Consuls’ Names.” Athenaeum 56: 80–108.Google Scholar

Drummond, A. 1994. Rev. of Libero, Obstruktion.CR 44: 123–124.Google Scholar

Drummond, A. 1995. Law, Politics and Power: Sallust and the Execution of the Catilinarian Conspirators. Stuttgart.Google Scholar

Drummond, A. 1999. “Tribunes and Tribunician Programs in 63 B.C.” Athenaeum 87: 121–167.Google Scholar

Drummond, A. 2013. “C. Asinius Pollio.” In Cornell, T. J. (ed.), Fragments of the Roman Historians. 3 vols. Oxford. 1 :430–435.Google Scholar

Dugan, J. 2013. “Cicero and the Politics of Ambiguity: Interpreting the Pro Marcello.” In Steel, C and van der Blom, H. (eds.), Community and Communication: Oratory and Politics in Republican Rome. Oxford. 211–225.Google Scholar

Duplá, A., Fatás, G., and Pina, F.. 1994. Rem publicam restituere: una propuesta popularis para la crisis republicana: las Epistulae ad Caesarem de Salustio. Zaragoza.Google Scholar

Dyck, A. 1996. A Commentary on Cicero, De Officiis. Ann Arbor.Google Scholar

Dyck, A. 2008. Cicero: Catilinarians. Cambridge.Google Scholar

Dyer, R. R. 1990. “Rhetoric and Intention in Cicero’s Pro Marcello.” JRS 80: 17–30.Google Scholar

Dyson, S. L. 1985. The Creation of the Roman Frontier. Princeton.Google Scholar

Dyson, S. L. 2010. Rome. A Living Portrait of an Ancient City. Baltimore.Google Scholar

Dzino, D. 2010. Illyricum in Roman Politics, 229 BC–AD 68. Cambridge.Google Scholar

Eberle, L. P. 2018. Rev. of Hölkeskamp 2017. JRS 108: 204–205.Google Scholar

Ebert, C. 1909. Über die Entstehung von Caesars “Bellum Gallicum.” Nürnberg.Google Scholar

Eckstein, A. 1987. Senate and General: Individual Decision-Making and Roman Foreign Relations, 264–194. Berkeley.Google Scholar

Ehrhardt, C. 1987. “Caesar’s First Triumph?” Prudentia 19: 50–58.Google Scholar

Elkins, N. T. 2007. Rev. of Hölkeskamp 2004. JRS 97: 268–270.Google Scholar

Elster, M. 2003. Die Gesetze der mittleren römischen Republik: Text und Kommentar. Darmstadt.Google Scholar

Erskine, A. 2001. Troy between Greece and Rome. Oxford.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Evans, J. D. 1990. “Statues of the Kings and Brutus on the Capitoline.” Opuscula Romana 18: 99–105.Google Scholar

Evans, R. J. 1994. Gaius Marius: A Political Biography. Pretoria.Google Scholar

Farney, G. 2007. Ethnic Identity and Aristocratic Competition in Republican Rome. Cambridge.Google Scholar

Feig Vishnia, R. 1996. State, Society, and Popular Leaders in Mid-Republican Rome: 241–167 B.C. London.Google Scholar

Ferguson, N. 1997. “Virtual History: Towards a ‘Chaotic’ Theory of the Past.” In Ferguson, N. (ed.), Virtual History: Alternatives and Counterfactuals. London. 1–90.Google Scholar

Ferguson, N. 1999. The Pity of War. London.Google Scholar

Ferguson, N. 2006. “Political Risk and the International Bond Market between the 1848 Revolution and the Outbreak of the First World War.” Economic History Review 59: 70–112.Google Scholar

Fernández-Götz, M., and Roymans, N. (eds.) 2018. Conflict Archaeology: Materialities of Collective Violence from Prehistory to Late Antiquity. London and New York.Google Scholar

Ferrary, J.-L. 1988. “Rogatio Servilia Agraria.” Athenaeum 66: 141–164.Google Scholar

Ferrary, J.-L. 1996. “Princeps legis et adscriptores: la collégialité des magistrats romains dans la procedure de proposition des lois.” RevPhil 70: 217–246.Google Scholar

Ferrary, J.-L. 2010. “À propos des pouvoirs et des honneurs décernés à César entre 48 et 44.” In Urso, G (ed.), Cesare: Precursore o visionario? Pisa. 9–30.Google Scholar

Fezzi, L. 1997. “Lex Clodia de iure et tempore legum rogandarum.” Studi Classici e Orientali 45: 297–328.Google Scholar

Fezzi, L. 2019. Crossing the Rubicon: Caesar’s Decision and the Fate of Rome. Tr. R. Dixon. New Haven.Google Scholar

Fischer, F. 1985. “Caesar und die Helvetier.” Bonner Jahrbücher 185: 1–26.Google Scholar

Fischer, F. 2004. “Caesars strategische Planung für Gallien. Zum Verhältnis von Darstellung und Wirklichkeit.” In Heftner, H and Tomaschitz, K (eds.), Ad Fontes! Festschrift G. Dobesch. Vienna. 305–315.Google Scholar

Fischer, F. 2009. “Caesars Griff nach Gallien.” Klio 91: 435–442.Google Scholar

Flaig, E. 1995. “Entscheidung und Konsens. Zu den Feldern der politischen Kommunikation zwischen Aristokratie und Plebs.” In Jehne, M. (ed.), Demokratie in Rom? Die Rolle des Volkes in der Politik der römischen Republik. Stuttgart. 77–127.Google Scholar

Flaig, E. 2002. Ritualisierte Politik: Zeichen, Gesten und Herrschaft im Alten Rom. Göttingen.Google Scholar

Flamerie de Lachapelle, G. 2011. Clementia. Recherches sur la notion de clémence à Rome, du début du Ier siècle a.C. à la mort d’Auguste. Bordeaux.Google Scholar

Flower, H. I. 1996. Ancestor Masks and Aristocratic Power in Roman Culture. Oxford.Google Scholar

Flower, H. I. 2006. The Art of Forgetting: Disgrace and Oblivion in Roman Political Culture. Chapel Hill.Google Scholar

Flower, H. I. 2010. Roman Republics. Princeton.Google Scholar

Flower, H. I. 2013. “Beyond the Contio: Political Communication in the Tribunate of Tiberius Gracchus.” In Steel, C and van der Blom, H. (eds.), Community and Communication: Oratory and Politics in Republican Rome. Oxford. 85–100.Google Scholar

Foxley, R. 2013. “Democracy in 1659: Harrington and the Good Old Cause.” In Taylor, S. and Tapsell (eds.), G., The Nature of the English Revolution Revisited. Woodbridge. 175–196.Google Scholar

Fränkel, E. 1956. “Eine Form römischer Kriegsbulletins.” Eranos 54: 189–194.Google Scholar

Frederiksen, M. W. 1966. “Caesar, Cicero and the Problem of Debt.” JRS 56: 128–141.Google Scholar

Gabba, E. 1967. Appiani Bellorum civilium liber primus. 2nd ed. Florence.Google Scholar

Gagliardi, L. 2011. Cesare, Pompeo e la lotta per le magistrature, anni 52–50 a.C. Milan.Google Scholar

Gagliardi, P. 2014. “Il poeta, Cesare, il trionfo.” Papyrologica Lupiensia 23: 31–52.Google Scholar

Gallagher, C. 2018. Telling It Like It Wasn’t: The Counterfactual Imagination in History and Fiction. Chicago and London.Google Scholar

Gardner, J. F. 2009. “The Dictator.” In Griffin, M. T. (ed.), A Companion to Julius Caesar. Malden, MA, and Oxford. 57–71.Google Scholar

Gazzaniga, M. 2011. Who’s In Charge? New York.Google Scholar

Gelzer, M. 1963. “Die lex Vatinia de imperio Caesaris.” Kleine Schriften 2: 206–228. (= Hermes 63 [1928] 113–137.)Google Scholar

Gelzer, M. 1968. Caesar: Politician and Statesman. Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar

Gelzer, M. 2008. Caesar: Der Politiker und Staatsmann. New ed. Stuttgart.Google Scholar

Gentles, I. J. 2011. Oliver Cromwell: God’s Warrior and the English Revolution. Basingstoke and New York.Google Scholar

Gesche, H. 1976. Caesar. Darmstadt.Google Scholar

Gildenhard, I. 2006. “Reckoning with Tyranny: Greek Thoughts on Caesar in Cicero’s Letters to Atticus in Early 49.” In Lewis, S. (ed.), Ancient Tyranny. Edinburgh: 197–209.Google Scholar

Gildenhard, I. 2011. Creative Eloquence: The Construction of Reality in Cicero’s Speeches. Oxford.Google Scholar

Gill, C. 1983. “The Question of Character-Development: Plutarch and Tacitus.” CQ 33: 469–487.Google Scholar

Giovannini, A. 1983. Consulare Imperium. Basel.Google Scholar

Giovannini, A. 1995. “Catilina et le problème des dettes.” In Malkin, I. and Rubinsohn (eds.), Z. W, Leaders and Masses in the Roman World: Studies in Honor of Zvi Yavez. Leiden. 15–34.Google Scholar

Girardet, K. M. 2000. “Caesars Konsulatsplan für das Jahr 49: Gründe und Scheitern.” Chiron 30: 679–710. (= Rom auf dem Weg von der Republik zum Prinzipat [Bonn 2007] 121–158.)Google Scholar

Girardet, K. M. 2001. “Imperia und provinciae des Pompeius 82 bis 48 v. Chr.” Chiron 31: 153–209.Google Scholar

Girardet, K. M. 2017. Januar 49 v. Chr.: Vorgeschichte, Rechtslage, politische Aspekte. Bonn.Google Scholar

Göbl, R. (ed.) 1994. R. Die Hexadrachmenprägung der Gross-Boier. Vienna.Google Scholar

Golden, G. 2013. Crisis Management during the Roman Republic. Cambridge.Google Scholar

Goldsworthy, A. 2006. Caesar: Life of a Colossus. New Haven.Google Scholar

Goltz, A. 2000. “Maiestas sine viribus: Die Bedeutung der Lictoren für die Konfliktbewältigungsstrategien römischer Magistrate.” In Linke, B. and Stemmler, M. (eds.), Mos Maiorum. Untersuchungen zu den Formen der Identitätsstiftung und Stabilisierung in der römischen Republik. Historia ES 141. Stuttgart. 237–267.Google Scholar

Gomme, A. W., and Sandbach., F. H 1973. Menander: A Commentary. Oxford.Google Scholar

Gotter, U. 1996. Der Diktator ist tot! Politik in Rom zwischen den Iden des März und der Begründung des zweiten Triumvirats. Historia ES 110. Stuttgart.Google Scholar

Goudineau, C. 1990. César et la Gaule. Paris.Google Scholar

Goudineau, C., and Peyre, C.. 1993. Bibracte et les Eduens: à la découverte d’un peuple gaulois. Paris.Google Scholar

Gray, C., Balbo, A., Marshall, R. M. A., and Steel, C. E. W.. 2018. Reading Republican Oratory: Reconstructions, Contexts, Receptions. Oxford.Google Scholar

Greenidge, A. H. J. 1901. The Criminal Procedure of Cicero’s Time. Oxford.Google Scholar

Greenidge, A. H. J., and Clay, A. M.. 1960. Sources for Roman History 133–70 B.C. Oxford.Google Scholar

Gregori, G. L. 2015. “Forgeries and Fakes: Historical and Documentary Forgeries.” In Bruun, C. and Edmondson, J. C. (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Roman Epigraphy. Oxford. 54–65.Google Scholar

Grethlein, J. 2013. Experience and Teleology in Ancient Historiography: “Futures Past” from Herodotus to Augustine. Cambridge and New York.Google Scholar

Griffin, M. T. 1976. Seneca, a Philosopher in Politics. Oxford and New York.Google Scholar

Griffin, M. T. 2003. “Clementia after Caesar: From Politics to Philosophy.” In Cairns, F. and Fantham, E. (eds.), Caesar against Liberty? Papers of the Langford Latin Seminar. Leeds. 154–182.Google Scholar

Griffin, M. T. (ed.) 2009. A Companion to Julius Caesar. Malden, MA, and Oxford.Google Scholar

Griffin, M. T., and Atkins, E. M. (eds.) 1991. Marcus Tullius Cicero: On Duties. Cambridge.Google Scholar

Griffiths, D. M. 2008. “Changing Life Expectancy throughout History.” Journal of the Royal Society of Medicine 101: 577.Google Scholar

Grillo, L. 2012. The Art of Caesar’s Bellum Civile: Literature, Ideology, and Community. Cambridge.Google Scholar

Grillo, L. 2015. Cicero’s De provinciis consularibus oratio. Oxford.Google Scholar

Grillo, L., and Krebs, C. (eds.) 2018. The Cambridge Companion to the Writings of Julius Caesar. Cambridge.Google Scholar

Grisart, A. 1981. “L’Atuatuca césarienne au Fort de Chaudfontaine?” L’antiquité classique 50: 367–381.Google Scholar

Griswold, C. L., and Konstan, D. (eds.) 2012. Ancient Forgiveness: Classical, Judaic, and Christian. Cambridge.Google Scholar

Gruen, E. 1966. “Publius Clodius, Instrument or Independent Agent?” Phoenix 20: 120–130.Google Scholar

Gruen, E. 1968. “Pompey and the Pisones.” CSCA 1: 155–170.Google Scholar

Gruen, E. 1969. “Notes on the ‘First Catilinarian Conspiracy.’” CPh 64: 20–24.Google Scholar

Gruen, E. 1969a. “Pompey, the Roman Aristocracy, and the Conference of Luca.” Historia 28: 71–108.Google Scholar

Gruen, E. 1973. “The Trial of C. Antonius.” Latomus 32: 301–310.Google Scholar

Gruen, E. 1974. The Last Generation of the Roman Republic. Berkeley.Google Scholar

Gruen, E. 1992. Culture and National Identity in Republican Rome. Ithaca, NY.Google Scholar

Gruen, E. 1995. “The ‘Fall’ of the Scipios.” In Malkin, I. and Rubinsohn (eds.), Z. W, Leaders and Masses in the Roman World: Studies in Honor of Zvi Yavez. Leiden. 59–90.Google Scholar

Gruen, E. 1996. “The Expansion of the Empire under Augustus.” CAH² 10: 147–197.Google Scholar

Gruen, E. 2009. “Caesar as a Politician.” In Griffin, M. T. (ed.), A Companion to Julius Caesar. Malden, MA, and Oxford. 23–36.Google Scholar

Haake, M., and Harders, A.-C. (eds.) 2017. Politische Kultur und Soziale Struktur der römischen Republik. Stuttgart.Google Scholar

Habicht, C. 1990. Cicero the Politician. Baltimore.Google Scholar

Halkin, L. 1953. La supplication d’action de grâces chez les Romains (Bibliothèque de la Faculté de Philosophie et Lettres de l’Université de Liège 128). Paris.Google Scholar

Hall, J. 2009. Politeness and Politics in Cicero’s Letters. Oxford.Google Scholar

Hall, J. 2009a. “Serving the Times: Cicero and Caesar the Dictator.” In Dominik, W. J., Garthwaite, J., and Roche, P. A. (eds.), Writing Politics in Imperial Rome. Leiden. 89–110.Google Scholar

Haller, B. 1967. “C. Asinius Pollio als Politiker und zeitkritischer Historiker. Ein Beitrag zur Geschichte des Übergangs von der Republik zum Prinzipat in Rom (60 bis 30 v. Chr.).” Diss. Münster.Google Scholar

Hammer, D. 2014. Roman Political Thought. Cambridge.Google Scholar

Hammersley, R. 2012. “James Harrington’s The Commonwealth of Oceana and the Republican Tradition.” In Lunger Knoppers, L. (ed.), The Oxford Handbook of Literature and the English Revolution. Oxford. 534–550.Google Scholar

Hardy, E. G. 1924. The Catilinarian Conspiracy in Its Context. Oxford.Google Scholar

Hargreaves Heap, S. P., and Varoufakis, Y.. 1995. Game Theory: A Critical Introduction. London and New York.Google Scholar

Harrington, J. 1656/1992. The Commonwealth of Oceana and A System of Politics. Ed. by Pocock, J. G. A.. Cambridge.Google Scholar

Harris, W. V. 1979. War and Imperialism in Republican Rome, 327–70 B.C. Oxford.Google Scholar

Harris, W. V. 2001. Restraining Rage: The Ideology of Anger Control in Classical Antiquity. Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar

Harris, W. V. 2009. Dreams and Experience in Classical Antiquity. Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar

Harrison, I. 2008. “Catiline, Clodius, and Popular Politics at Rome during the 60s and 50s BC.” BICS 51: 95–118.Google Scholar

Harrison, S. 2017. Horace, Odes Book II. Cambridge.Google Scholar

Haselgrove, C. 1984. “Warfare and Its Aftermath as Reflected in the Precious Metal Coinage of Belgic Gaul.” OJA 3: 81–105.Google Scholar

Hastrup, T. 1957. “On the Date of Caesar’s Commentaries of the Gallic War.” C&M 18: 59–74.Google Scholar

Havener, W. 2014. “A Ritual against the Rule? The Representation of Civil War Victory in the Late Republican Triumph.” In Lange, C. H. and Vervaet, F. J. (eds.), The Roman Republican Triumph: Beyond the Spectacle. Rome. 165–179.Google Scholar

Heftner, H. 1995. Plutarch und der Aufstieg des Pompeius. Ein historischer Kommentar zu Plutarchs Pompeiusvita Teil I: Kap. 1–45. Frankfurt.Google Scholar

Hegel, G. W. F. 1847/2001. The Philosophy of History. Tr. J. Sebree. Kitchener.Google Scholar

Heikkilä, K. 1993. “Lex non iure rogata: Senate and the Annulment of the Laws in the Republic.” In Paananen (ed.), U., Senatus Populusque Romanus: Studies in Roman Republican Legislation. Helsinki. 117–142.Google Scholar

Hekster, H. 2012. “Kings and Regime Change in the Roman Republic.” In Smith, C and Yarrow, L. M. (eds.), Imperialism, Cultural Politics, and Polybius. Oxford. 184–204.Google Scholar

Henderson, J. 1998. Fighting for Rome: Poets and Caesars, History and Civil War. Cambridge.Google Scholar

Hickson-Hahn, F. 2000. “Pompey’s Supplicatio Duplicata: A Novel Form of Thanksgiving.” Phoenix 54: 244–254.Google Scholar

Hillard, T. 2013. “Graffiti’s Engagement: The Political Graffiti of the Late Roman Republic.” In Sears, G., Keegan, P., and Laurence (eds.), R., Written Space in the Latin West, 200 BC to AD 300. London. 105–122.Google Scholar

Hillman, T. P. 1988. “Strategic Reality and the Movements of Caesar, January, 49 BC.” Historia 37: 248–252.Google Scholar

Hillman, T. P. 1996. “Pompeius ad Parthos?” Klio 78: 380–399.Google Scholar

Hinard, F. 1985. Les proscriptions de la Rome républicaine. Rome.Google Scholar

Hinard, F. 2008. Syllana Varia. Aux sources de la première guerre civile romaine. Paris.Google Scholar

Hodgson, L. 2017. Res Publica and the Roman Republic: “Without Body or Form.” Oxford.Google Scholar

Hoffmann, W. 1952. “Zur Vorgeschichte von Caesars Eingreifen in Gallien.” AU 4: 5–22.Google Scholar

Hölkeskamp, K.-J. 2004. Senatus populusque Romanus. Die politische Kultur der Republik – Dimensionen und Deutungen. Stuttgart.Google Scholar

Hölkeskamp, K.-J. 2008. Rev. of Pittenger, Contested Triumphs. Gnomon 82: 714–720.Google Scholar

Hölkeskamp, K.-J. 2010. Reconstructing the Roman Republic: An Ancient Political Culture and Modern Research. Princeton.Google Scholar

Hölkeskamp, K.-J. 2017. Libera res publica. Die politische Kultur des antiken Rom – Positionen und Perspektiven. Stuttgart.Google Scholar

Hölkeskamp, K.-J. (ed.) 2009. Eine politische Kultur (in) der Krise? Die “letzte Generation” der römischen Republik. Munich.Google Scholar

Hollis, A. S. 2007. Fragments of Roman Poetry. Oxford.Google Scholar

Holzer, H. 2014. Lincoln and the Power of the Press: The War for Public Opinion. New York.Google Scholar

Hopkins, K., and Burton., G 1983. “Political Succession in the Late Republic” and “Ambition and Withdrawal: The Senatorial Aristocracy under the Emperors.” In Hopkins, K (ed.), Death and Renewal. Cambridge. 31–200.Google Scholar

Horsfall, N. 1974. “The Ides of March. Some New Problems.” G&R 21: 191–199.Google Scholar

Hume, D. 1778/1983. The History of England: From the Invasion of Julius Caesar to the Revolution in 1688. Vol. 5. London.Google Scholar

Humphreys, A. R. (ed.) 1984. Shakespeare: Julius Caesar. Oxford.Google Scholar

Hutchinson, G. O. 1998. Cicero’s Correspondence: A Literary Study. Oxford.Google Scholar

Itgenshorst, T. 2005. Tota illa pompa: Der Triumph in der römischen Republik. Göttingen.Google Scholar

Itgenshorst, T., and Le Doze, P. (eds.) 2017. Le norme sous la République et le Haut-Empire romains. Élaboration, diffusion et contournements. Bordeaux.Google Scholar

Jahn, J. 1970. Interregnum und Wahldiktatur. Kallmünz.Google Scholar

Jal, P. 1961. “Remarques sur la cruauté à Rome pendant les guerres civiles (de Sylla à Vespasien).” BAGB 475–501.Google Scholar

Jehne, M. 1987. “Caesars Bemühungen um die Reintegration der Pompeianer.” Chiron 17: 313–341.Google Scholar

Jehne, M. 1987a. Der Staat des Dictators Caesar. Cologne.Google Scholar

Jehne, M. 2000. “Caesar und die Krise von 47 v. Chr.” In Urso, G (ed.), L’ultimo Cesare. Rome: 151–173.Google Scholar

Jehne, M. 2001. Caesar. Munich.Google Scholar

Jehne, M. 2005. “Über den Rubicon. Caesars Eröffnung des Bürgerkrieges am 10. Januar 49 v. Chr.” In W. Krieger (ed.), Und keine Schlacht bei Marathon. Große Ereignisse und Mythen der europäischen Geschichte. Stuttgart. 25–49, 325–336.Google Scholar

Jehne, M. 2006. “Who Attended Roman Assemblies? Some Remarks on Political Participation in the Roman Republic.” In Simón, F. M., Pina Polo, F., and Rodríguez, J. R. (eds.), Repúblicas y ciudadanos: modelos de participación cívica en el mundo antiguo. Barcelona. 221–234.Google Scholar

Jehne, M. 2006a. “Methods, Models, and Historiography.” In Rosenstein, N. and Morstein-Marx, R. (eds.), A Companion to the Roman Republic. Malden, MA. 3–28.Google Scholar

Jehne, M. 2009. Der große Trend, der kleine Sachzwang und das handelnde Individuum: Caesars Entscheidungen. Munich.Google Scholar

Jehne, M. 2009a. “Caesars Alternative(n): das Ende der römischen Republik zwischen autonomem Prozess und Betriebsunfall.” In Hölkeskamp, K.-J. (ed.), Eine politische Kultur (in) der Krise? Die “letzte Generation” der römischen Republik. Munich. 141–160.Google Scholar

Jehne, M. 2010. “Erfahrungsraum und Erwartungshorizont bei Julius Caesar.” In Urso, G (ed.), Cesare: Precursore o visionario? Pisa. 311–332.Google Scholar

Jehne, M. 2011. “Blaming the People in Front of the People.” In Smith, C and Covino (eds.), R, Praise and Blame in Roman Republican Rhetoric. Swansea. 111–125.Google Scholar

Jehne, M. 2013. “Feeding the Plebs with Words: The Significance of Senatorial Public Oratory in the Small World of Roman Politics.” In Steel, C and van der Blom, H. (eds.), Community and Communication: Oratory and Politics in Republican Rome. Oxford. 49–62.Google Scholar

Jehne, M. 2017. “Why the Anti-Caesarians Failed: Political Communication on the Eve of Civil War (51 to 49 BC).” In Rosillo-López, C (ed.), Political Communication in the Roman World. Leiden and Boston. 201–227.Google Scholar

Jones, C. P. 1970. “Cicero’s Cato.” RhM 113: 188–196.Google Scholar

Kahneman, D. 2011. Thinking Fast and Slow. New York.Google Scholar

Kallet-Marx, R. M. 1995. Hegemony to Empire: The Development of the Roman Imperium in the East from 148 to 62 BC. Berkeley.Google Scholar

Kantor, G. 2014. “Roman Treaty with Lycia (SEG LV 1452) and the Date of Caesar’s Third Dictatorship.” ZPE 190: 135–136.Google Scholar

Kaster, R. 2006. Marcus Tullius Cicero: Speech on Behalf of Publius Sestius. Oxford.Google Scholar

Kaster, R. 2016. Studies on the Text of Suetonius’ “De vita Caesarum.”’ Oxford.Google Scholar

Kay, P. 2014. Rome’s Economic Revolution. Oxford.Google Scholar

Keaveney, A. 1982. “Young Pompey, 106–79 B.C.” AC 51: 111–139.Google Scholar

Keaveney, A. 1984. “Who Were the Sullani?” Klio 66: 114–150.Google Scholar

Keaveney, A. 2005. Sulla: The Last Republican. Rev. ed. London.Google Scholar

Keaveney, A. 2007. The Army in the Roman Revolution. London and New York.Google Scholar

Keaveney, A. 2018. “Notes on the First Mithridatic War in Macedonia and Greece.” SyllClass 29: 29–65.Google Scholar

Keppie, L. G. F. 1983. Colonisation and Veteran Settlement in Italy, 47–14 B.C. London.Google Scholar

King, A. 1990. Roman Gaul and Germany. Berkeley.Google Scholar

Koestermann, E. 1970. “Ps.-Sall. Epistula ad Caesarem senem. I.” Historia 19: 216–223.Google Scholar

Koestermann, E. 1971. C. Sallustius Crispus: Bellum Iugurthinum. Heidelberg.Google Scholar

Konstan, D. 2005. “Clemency as a Virtue.” CPh 100: 337–346.Google Scholar

Konstan, D. 2007. “The Contemporary Political Context.” In Skinner, M. B. (ed.), A Companion to Catullus. Malden, MA. 108–144.Google Scholar

Koortbojian, M. 2013. The Divinization of Caesar and Augustus: Precedents, Consequences, Implications. Cambridge.Google Scholar

Kornemann, E. 1896. Die historische Schriftstellerei des Consuls Asinius Pollio. Leipzig.Google Scholar

Kraft, K. 1969. Der goldene Kranz Caesars und der Kampf um die Entlarvung des “Tyrannen.” 2nd ed. Darmstadt.Google Scholar

Kraner, F., Dittenberger, W., and Meusel, H.. 1964. C. Iulii Caesaris Commentarii de bello gallico. 20th ed. 3 vols. Zürich and Berlin.Google Scholar

Kraus, C. 2005. “Hair, Hegemony, and Historiography: Caesar’s Style and Its Earliest Critics.” PBA 129: 97–115.Google Scholar

Kraus, C. 2009. “Bellum Gallicum.” In Griffin, M. T. (ed.), A Companion to Julius Caesar. Malden, MA, and Oxford. 159–175.Google Scholar

Krebs, C. 2006. “Imaginary Geography in Caesar’s Bellum Gallicum.” AJPh 127: 111–136.Google Scholar

Krebs, C. 2013. “Caesar, Lucretius and the Dates of the De rerum natura and the Commentarii.” CQ 63: 751–758.Google Scholar

Krebs, C. 2017. “Caesar the Historian.” In Raaflaub, K. (ed.), The Landmark Julius Caesar. New York. Web Essay DD, pp. 210–213. http://thelandmarkcaesar.com/LandmarkCaesarWebEssays_5Jan2018.pdfGoogle Scholar

Krebs, C. 2018. “More than Words: The Commentarii in Their Propagandistic Context.” In Grillo, L. and Krebs, C. (eds.), The Cambridge Companion to the Writings of Julius Caesar. Cambridge. 29–42.Google Scholar

Krebs, C. 2018a. “A Style of Choice.” In Grillo, L. and Krebs, C. (eds.), The Cambridge Companion to the Writings of Julius Caesar. Cambridge. 110–130.Google Scholar

Kumar, C. 2015. “Electoral Violence, Threats and Security: Problems and Prospects for Indian Democracy.” American Journal of Social Science Research 1: 38–51.Google Scholar

Kunkel, W., and Wittmann., R. 1995. Staatsordnung und Staatspraxis der Römischen Republik. Munich.Google Scholar

Lacey, W. K. 1961. “The Tribunate of Curio.” Historia 10: 318–329.Google Scholar

Lange, C. H., and Vervaet, F. J. (eds.) 2014. The Roman Republican Triumph: Beyond the Spectacle. Rome.Google Scholar

Laurence, R. 1999. The Roads of Roman Italy: Mobility and Cultural Change. New York.Google Scholar

Laurence, R. 1999a. “Tourism, Townplanning and romanitas: Rimini’s Roman heritage.” In Biddiss, M. D. and Wyke, M. (eds.), The Uses and Abuses of Antiquity. Bern and Berlin. 187–205.Google Scholar

Le Bohec, Y. 1998. “Vercingétorix.” RSA 28: 85–120.Google Scholar

Levick, B. 1998. “The Veneti Revisited: C. E. Stevens and the Tradition on Caesar the Propagandist.” In Welch, K. and Powell, A. (eds.), Caesar as Artful Reporter. Swansea. 61–83.Google Scholar

Levitsky, S., and Ziblatt, D. 2018. How Democracies Die. New York.Google Scholar

Levithan, J. 2013. Roman Siege Warfare. Ann Arbor.Google Scholar

Lewis, S. (ed.) 2006. Ancient Tyranny. Edinburgh.Google Scholar

Linderski, J. 1965. “Constitutional Aspects of the Consular Elections in 59 B.C.” Historia 14: 423–442.Google Scholar

Linderski, J. 1966. “Were Pompey and Crassus Elected in Absence to Their First Consulship?” In Bernhard, M.-L. (ed.), Mélanges offerts à Kazimierz Michalowski. Warsaw. 523–526.Google Scholar

Linderski, J. 1995. Roman Questions: Selected Papers 1958–1993. Stuttgart.Google Scholar

Lindley, D. V. 2012. Understanding Uncertainty. Hoboken.Google Scholar

Lintott, A. W. 1968/1999. Violence in Republican Rome. Oxford.Google Scholar

Lintott, A. W. 1972. “Provocatio: From the Struggle of the Orders to the Principate.” ANRW 1.2: 226–267.Google Scholar

Lintott, A. W. 1990. “Electoral Bribery in the Roman Republic.” JRS 80: 1–16.Google Scholar

Lintott, A. W. 1993. Imperium Romanum: Politics and Administration. London.Google Scholar

Lintott, A. W. 1999. The Constitution of the Roman Republic. Oxford.Google Scholar

Lintott, A. W. 2008. Cicero as Evidence. Oxford.Google Scholar

Lintott, A. W. 2009. “The Assassination.” In Griffin, M. T. (ed.), A Companion to Julius Caesar. Malden, MA, and Oxford. 72–82.Google Scholar

Lintott, A. W. 2013. Plutarch: Demosthenes and Cicero. Oxford.Google Scholar

Liverani, P. 2008. “Cesare urbanista.” In Gentili, G. (ed.), Giulio Cesare: L’uomo, le imprese, il mito. Milan. 42–51.Google Scholar

Lott, J. B. 2001. The Neighborhoods of Augustan Rome. New York.Google Scholar

Lundgreen, C. 2011. Regelkonflikte in der römischen Republik. Geltung und Gewichtung von Normen in politischen Entscheidungsprozessen. Stuttgart.Google Scholar

Macfarlane, R. T. 1996. “Ab inimicis incitatus: On Dating the Composition of Caesar’s Bellum Civile.” SyllClass 7: 107–132.Google Scholar

MacGillivray, R. 1974. Restoration Historians and the English Civil War. The Hague.Google Scholar

Mackay, C. 2000. “Sulla and the Monuments: Studies in His Public Persona.” Historia 49: 161–210.Google Scholar

Mackie, N. 1992. “Popularis Ideology and Popular Politics at Rome in the First Century BC.” RhM 135: 49–73.Google Scholar

Maier, U. 1978. Caesars Feldzüge in Gallien (58–51 v. Chr.) in ihrem Zusammenhang mit der stadtrömischen Politik. Bonn.Google Scholar

Malitz, J. 1984. “Caesar’s Partherkrieg.” Historia 33: 21–59.Google Scholar

Malitz, J. 1987. “ Die Kanzlei Caesars: Herrschaftsorganisation zwischen Republik und Prinzipat.” Historia 36: 51–72.Google Scholar

Manuwald, G. 2007. Cicero: Philippics 3–9. 2 vols. Berlin.Google Scholar

Marshall, B. A. 1974. “Cicero and Sallust on Crassus and Catiline.” Latomus 33: 804–813.Google Scholar

Marshall, B. A. 1975. “The Date of the Delivery of Cicero’s in Pisonem.” CQ 25: 88–93.Google Scholar

Marshall, B. A. 1985. A Historical Commentary on Asconius. Columbia, MO.Google Scholar

Marshall, B. A. 1987. “Pompeius’ Fear of Assassination.” Chiron 17: 119–133.Google Scholar

McDermott, W. 1970. “In Ligarianam.” TAPhA 101: 317–347.Google Scholar

McDermott, W. 1972. “Cicero’s Publication of His Consular Orations.” Philologus 116: 277–284.Google Scholar

McDermott, W. 1982/1983. “Caesar’s Projected Dacian-Parthian Expedition.” AncSoc 13/14: 223–231.Google Scholar

McDonnell, M. 2006. Roman Manliness: Virtus and the Roman Republic. Cambridge.Google Scholar

McGushin, P. 1977. Bellum Catilinae: A Commentary. Leiden.Google Scholar

McGushin, P. 1992–1994. Sallust: The Histories. 2 vols. Oxford.Google Scholar

Meier, C. 1961. “Zur Chronologie und Politik in Caesars erstem Konsulat.” Historia 10: 68–98.Google Scholar

Meier, C. 1965. “Populares.” RE Suppl. 10: 549–615.Google Scholar

Meier, C. 1970. “Caesars Bürgerkrieg.” In Meier, C., Entstehung des Begriffs “Demokratie.” Vier Prolegomena zu einer historischen Theorie. Frankfurt. 70–150.Google Scholar

Meier, C. 1975. “Das Kompromiss-Angebot an Caesar i. J. 59 v. Chr., ein Beispiel senatorischer ‘Verfassungspolitik.’” MH 32: 197–208.Google Scholar

Meier, C. 1982. Caesar. English tr. D. McClintock. New York.Google Scholar

Mensching, E. 1984. “Zu den Auseinandersetzungen um den Gallischen Krieg und der Considius-Episode (BG I 21–22).” Hermes 112: 53–65.Google Scholar

Meyer, E. 1919. Caesars Monarchie und das Principat des Pompeius. Stuttgart.Google Scholar

Meyer, P. N. 2014. Storytelling for Lawyers. Oxford and New York.Google Scholar

Miles, G. 1995. Livy: Reconstructing Early Rome. Ithaca and London.Google Scholar

Millar, F. 1998. The Crowd in Rome in the Late Republic. Ann Arbor.Google Scholar

Millar, F. 2002. Rome, the Greek World, and the East. Chapel Hill.Google Scholar

Milnor, K. 2012. “Gender and Forgiveness in the Early Roman Empire.” In Griswold, C. L. and Konstan, D. (eds.), Ancient Forgiveness: Classical, Judaic, and Christian. Cambridge. 97–114.Google Scholar

Mitchell, T. 1979. Cicero: The Ascending Years. New Haven.Google Scholar

Mitchell, T. 1991. Cicero: The Senior Statesman. New Haven.Google Scholar

Moatti, C. 2017. “Res publica, forma rei publicae and SPQR.” Essays in Honour of Fergus Millar. BICS 60: 34–48.Google Scholar

Moatti, C. 2018. Res publica. Histoire romaine de la chose publique. Paris.Google Scholar

Moles, J. 1982. “Plutarch, Crassus 13.4–5 and Cicero’s De Consiliis Suis.” LCM 7: 136–137.Google Scholar

Moles, J. 1988. The Life of Cicero. Warminster.Google Scholar

Moles, J. 1997. “Plutarch, Brutus and Brutus’ Greek and Latin Letters.” In Mossman, J. M. (ed.), Plutarch and His Intellectual World: Essays on Plutarch. London. 141–168.Google Scholar

Mommsen, T. 1887. Römisches Staatsrecht. 3 vols. Leipzig.Google Scholar

Mommsen, T. 1894/1996. The History of Rome. 5 vols. Tr. W. P. Dickson. London.Google Scholar

Montlahuc, P. 2019. Le pouvoir des bons mots. “Faire rire” et politique à Rome du milieu du IIIe siècle a.C. à l’avènement des Antonins. Rome.Google Scholar

Montesquieu, Charles de Secondat (Baron de). 1734/1965. Considerations on the Causes of the Greatness of the Romans and Their Decline. Tr. D. Lowenthal. New York.Google Scholar

Morgan, L. 1997. “Julius Caesar as Tyrant and Pedant.” JRS 87: 23–40.Google Scholar

Morgan, L. 2000. “The Autopsy of C. Asinius Pollio.” JRS 90: 51–69.Google Scholar

Morrell, K. 2017. Pompey, Cato, and the Governance of the Roman Empire. Oxford.Google Scholar

Morrell, K. 2018. “‘Certain Gentlemen Say … .’: Cicero, Cato, and the Debate on the Validity of Clodius’ Laws.” In Gray, C., Balbo, A., Marshall, R. M. A., and Steel, C. E. W. (eds.), Reading Republican Oratory: Reconstructions, Contexts, Receptions. Oxford. 191–210.Google Scholar

Morstein-Marx, R. 1998. “Publicity, Popularity and Patronage in the Commentariolum Petitionis.” CA 17: 259–288.Google Scholar

Morstein-Marx, R. 2004. Mass Oratory and Political Power in the Late Republic. Cambridge.Google Scholar

Morstein-Marx, R. 2007. “Caesar’s Alleged Fear of Prosecution and His ratio absentis in the Approach to the Civil War.” Historia 56: 159–178.Google Scholar

Morstein-Marx, R. 2009. “Dignitas and res publica: Caesar and Republican Legitimacy.” In Hölkeskamp, K.-J. (ed.), Eine politische Kultur (in) der Krise? Die “letzte Generation” der römischen Republik. Munich. 115–140.Google Scholar

Morstein-Marx, R. 2011. “Consular Appeals to the Army in 88 and 87: The Locus of Legitimacy in Late-Republican Rome.” In Beck, H., Duplá, A., Jehne, M., and Pina Polo, F. (eds.), Consuls and Res Publica. Cambridge. 259–278.Google Scholar

Morstein-Marx, R. 2012. “Political Graffiti in the Late Roman Republic: Hidden Transcripts and Common Knowledge.”, C. Kuhn, (ed.), Politische Kommunikation und öffentliche Meinung in der antiken Welt. Heidelberg. 191–217.Google Scholar

Morstein-Marx, R. 2013. “‘Cultural Hegemony’ and the Communicative Power of the Roman Elite.” In Steel, C. and van der Blom, H. (eds.), Community and Communication: Oratory and Politics in Republican Rome. Oxford. 29–48.Google Scholar

Morstein-Marx, R. 2014. Rev. of Arena 2012. CJ-Online 2014.03.07.Google Scholar

Morstein-Marx, R. 2015. “Persuading the People in the Roman Participatory Context.” In Hammer (ed.), D., A Companion to Greek Democracy and the Roman Republic. Malden, MA. 294–309.Google Scholar

Morstein-Marx, R. 2019. “Fear of the People.” RSI 131: 515–533.Google Scholar

Morstein-Marx, R. Forthcoming. “Values and Ideology.” In Arena, V. and Prag, J. (eds.), Companion to Roman Republican Political Culture.Google Scholar

Morstein-Marx, R., and Rosenstein, N.. 2006. “The Transformation of the Republic.” In Rosenstein, N. and Morstein-Marx, R. (eds.), A Companion to the Roman Republic. Malden, MA. 625–637.Google Scholar

Mouristen, H. 2001. Plebs and Politics in the Late Roman Republic. Cambridge.Google Scholar

Mouristen, H. 2017. Politics in the Roman Republic. Cambridge.Google Scholar

Muccioli, F. 1994. “Dopo la vittoria dei Campi Raudi: Mario Terzo Fondatore di Rome? (Su Plut., Mar. 27, 8–10).” Atene e Roma 39: 192–205.Google Scholar

Müller, C. 1972. Untersuchungen zu Caesars italischem Feldzug 49 v. Chr. Munich.Google Scholar

Mundt, F. 2004. “Cicero’s ‘Commentarioli belli Ciliciensis’: Fam. 15.4 and other letters from Cilicia.” Philologus 148: 255–273.Google Scholar

Muntz, C. E. 2017. Diodorus Siculus and the World of the Late Roman Republic. Oxford.Google Scholar

Nicolet, C. 1966/1974. L’ordre équestre à l’époque républicaine (312–43 av. J.-C.). 2 vols. BEFAR 207. Paris.Google Scholar

Nippel, W. 1995. Public Order in Ancient Rome. Cambridge.Google Scholar

Nisbet, R. G. M. 1961. Cicero in L. Calpurnium Pisonem. Oxford.Google Scholar

Nisbet, R. G. M., and Hubbard, M.. 1978. A Commentary on Horace, Odes, Book II. Oxford.Google Scholar

Nissen, H. 1881. “Der Ausbruch des Bürgerkriegs 49 v. Chr.” HZ 46: 48–105.Google Scholar

Noreña, C. F. 2011. Imperial Ideals in the Roman West: Representation, Circulation, Power. Cambridge.Google Scholar

North, J. A. 1990. “Politics and Aristocracy in the Roman Republic.” CPh 85: 277–287.Google Scholar

North, J. A. 2008. “Caesar at the Lupercalia.” JRS 98: 144–160.Google Scholar

North, J. A. 2010. Rev. of Flower, Roman Republics. JRA 23: 469–472.Google Scholar

North, J. A. 2011. “Lex Domitia Revisited.” In Richardson, J. H. and Santangelo, F. (eds.), Priests and State in the Roman World. Stuttgart. 39–61.Google Scholar

Nousek, D. 2018. “Genres and Generic Contaminations: The Commentarii.” In Grillo, L. and Krebs, C. (eds.), The Cambridge Companion to the Writings of Julius Caesar. Cambridge. 97–109.Google Scholar

Odelman, E. 1972. “Études sur quelques reflets du style administratif chez César.” Diss. Stockholm.Google Scholar

Ogilvie, R. M. 1965. A Commentary on Livy, Books I–V. Oxford.Google Scholar

Ogilvie, R. M., and Richmond., I. A 1967. Tacitus: De vita Agricolae. Oxford.Google Scholar

Osgood, J. 2006. Caesar’s Legacy. Cambridge.Google Scholar

Osgood, J. 2007. Rev. of Wyke (ed.) 2006, Kamm, Julius Caesar, and Goldsworthy 2006. CR 57: 466–469.Google Scholar

Osgood, J. 2008. “Caesar and Nicomedes.” CQ 58: 687–691.Google Scholar

Osgood, J. 2009. “The Pen and the Sword: Writing and Conquest in Caesar’s Gaul.” ClAnt 28: 328–358.Google Scholar

Osgood, J. 2014. “Julius Caesar and Spanish Triumph-Hunting.” In C. H. Lange and F. J. Vervaet (eds.), The Roman Republican Triumph: Beyond the Spectacle. Rome. 149–162.Google Scholar

Östenberg, I. 2009. Staging the World: Spoils, Captives, and Representations in the Roman Triumphal Procession. Oxford.Google Scholar

Östenberg, I. 2014. “Triumph and Spectacle. Victory Celebrations in the Late Republican Civil Wars.” In Lange, C. H. and Vervaet, F. J. (eds.), The Roman Republican Triumph: Beyond the Spectacle. Rome. 181–193.Google Scholar

Ottmer, H. M. 1979. Die Rubikon-Legende. Untersuchungen zu Caesars und Pompeius’ Strategie vor und nach Ausbruch des Bürgerkrieges. Boppard.Google Scholar

Panayotakis, C. 2010. Decimus Laberius: The Fragments. Cambridge.Google Scholar

Parkin, T. G. 1992. Demography and Roman Society. Baltimore and London.Google Scholar

Pascucci, C. 2007. “Fluvius Rubico, quondam finis Italiae. Osservazioni sul corso del Rubicone in epoca romana.” Orizzonti 8: 79–85.Google Scholar

Peer, A. 2015. Julius Caesar’s Bellum Civile and the Composition of a New Reality. Dorchester.Google Scholar

Pelling, C. 1982. Rev. of Ottmer 1979. Gnomon 54: 212–213.Google Scholar

Pelling, C. 1988. Life of Antony. Cambridge.Google Scholar

Pelling, C. 2002. Plutarch and History: Eighteen Studies. Swansea.Google Scholar

Pelling, C. 2004. “Plutarch on the Outbreak of the Roman Civil War.” In Heftner, H. and Tomaschitz, K. (eds.), Ad Fontes! Festschrift für G. Dobesch. Vienna. 317–327.Google Scholar

Pelling, C. 2006. “Judging Julius Caesar.” In Wyke, M. (ed.), Julius Caesar in Western Culture. Malden, MA. 3–26.Google Scholar

Pelling, C. 2006a. “Breaking the Bounds: Writing about Julius Caesar.” In McGing, B. C. and Mossman, J. M. (eds.), The Limits of Ancient Biography. 255–280.Google Scholar

Pelling, C. 2011. Plutarch: Caesar. Oxford.Google Scholar

Pennacini, A. (ed.) 1993. Gaio Giulio Cesare, Opera omnia. Tr. A. La Penna and A. Pennacini. Commentary by M. Faraguna, A. Garzetti, and D. Vottero. Turin.Google Scholar

Pepe, C. 2018. “Fragments of Epideictic Oratory: The Exemplary Case of the Laudatio Funebris for Women.” In Gray, C., Balbo, A., Marshall, R. M. A., and Steel, C. E. W. (eds.), Reading Republican Oratory: Reconstructions, Contexts, Receptions. Oxford. 281–296.Google Scholar

Petersmann, G. 1983. “Cornelius Gallus und der Papyrus von Qasr Ibrim.” ANRW II.30.3: 1649–1655.Google Scholar

Peterson, M. (ed.) 2015. The Prisoner’s Dilemma. Cambridge.Google Scholar

Pettinger, A. 2012. The Republic in Danger. Oxford.Google Scholar

Phillips, E. J. 1974. “The Prosecution of C. Rabirius in 63 BC.” Klio 56: 87–101.Google Scholar

Pina Polo, F. 1989. “Las contiones civiles y militares en Roma.” Diss. Saragossa.Google Scholar

Pina Polo, F. 2006. “The Tyrant Must Die: Preventive Tyrannicide in Roman Political Thought.” In Simón, F. M., Pina Polo, F., and Rodríguez, J. R. (eds.), Repúblicas y ciudadanos: modelos de participación cívica en el mundo antiguo. Barcelona. 71–101.Google Scholar

Pina Polo, F. 2011. The Consul at Rome: The Civil Functions of the Consuls in the Roman Republic. Cambridge.Google Scholar

Pina Polo, F. 2017. “The ‘Tyranny’ of the Gracchi and the Concordia of the Optimates: An Ideological Construct.” In Cristofori, R., Galimberti, A., and Vio, F. R. (eds.), Costruire la memoria. Rome. 5–33.Google Scholar

Pina Polo, F. 2018. “Political Alliances and Rivalries in Contiones in the Late Roman Republic.” In van der Blom, H., Gray, C., and Steel, C. (eds.), Institutions and Ideology in Republican Rome: Speech, Audience and Decision. Cambridge. 107–127.Google Scholar

Pina Polo, F. 2018a. “Magistrates without Pedigree: The Consules Suffecti of the Triumviral Age.” JRS 108: 99–114.Google Scholar

Pittenger, M. R. Pelikan. 2008. Contested Triumphs: Politics, Pageantry, and Performance in Livy’s Republican Rome. Berkeley.Google Scholar

Pocock, L. G. 1926/1967. A Commentary on Cicero in Vatinium. London. (Repr. Amsterdam 1967.)Google Scholar

Powell, A. 1998. “Julius Caesar and the Presentation of Massacre.” In Welch, K. and Powell, A. (eds.), Caesar as Artful Reporter. Swansea. 111–137.Google Scholar

Powell, A. (ed.) 2013. Hindsight in Greek and Roman History. Swansea.Google Scholar

Powell, H. J. 2016. Targeting Americans: The Constitutionality of the U.S. Drone War. Oxford.Google Scholar

Price, S. R. F. 1984. Rituals and Power: The Roman Imperial Cult in Asia Minor. Cambridge.Google Scholar

Pucci Ben Zeev, M. 1996. “When Was the Title ‘Dictator perpetuus’ Given to Caesar?” AC 65: 251–253.Google Scholar

Pucci Ben Zeev, M. 1996a. “Caesar’s Decrees in the Antiquities: Josephus’ Forgeries or Authentic Roman senatus consulta?” Athenaeum 84: 71–91.Google Scholar

Purcell, N. 1993. “Atrium Libertatis.” PBSR 61: 125–155.Google Scholar

Putnam, M. C. J. 1980. “Propertius and the New Gallus Fragment.” ZPE 39: 49–56.Google Scholar

Raaflaub, K. 1974. Dignitatis contentio. Studien zur Motivation und politischen Taktik im Bürgerkrieg zwischen Caesar und Pompeius. Munich.Google Scholar

Raaflaub, K. 1974a. “Zum politischen Wirken der caesarfreundlichen Volkstribunen am Vorabend des Bürgerkrieges.” Chiron 4: 293–326.Google Scholar

Raaflaub, K. 1975. “Caesar und die Friedensverhandlungen zu Beginn des Bürgerkrieges von 49 v. Chr.” Chiron 5: 247–300.Google Scholar

Raaflaub, K. 2003. “Caesar as Liberator? Factional Politics, Civil War, and Ideology.” In Cairns, F. and Fantham, E. (eds.), Caesar against Liberty? Papers of the Langford Latin Seminar. Leeds. 35–67.Google Scholar

Raaflaub, K. 2010. “Creating a Grand Coalition of True Roman Citizens.” In Breed, B., Damon, C., and Rossi, A. (eds.), Citizens of Discord. Oxford. 159–170.Google Scholar

Raaflaub, K. 2010a. “Between Tradition and Innovation: Shifts in Caesar’s Political Propaganda and Self-Representation.” In Urso, G (ed.), Cesare: Precursore o visionario? Pisa. 141–157.Google Scholar

Raaflaub, K. 2017. “The Roman Commentarius and Caesar’s Commentaries.” In Raaflaub, K. (ed.), The Landmark Julius Caesar. New York. Web Essay CC, pp. 203–209. http://thelandmarkcaesar.com/LandmarkCaesarWebEssays_5Jan2018.pdfGoogle Scholar

Raaflaub, K. (ed.) 2017. The Landmark Julius Caesar. New York.Google Scholar

Raaflaub, K., and Ramsey, J. T.. 2017. “Reconstructing the Chronology of Caesar’s Gallic Wars.” Histos 11: 1–74.Google Scholar

Raaflaub, K., and Ramsey, J. T.. 2017a. “The Chronology of Caesar’s Campaigns.” In Raaflaub, K. (ed.), The Landmark Julius Caesar. New York. Web Essay BB. http://thelandmarkcaesar.com/LandmarkCaesarWebEssays_5Jan2018.pdfGoogle Scholar

Racine, F. 2012. “Review of Billows 2009, Gelzer 2008, and Canfora 2007.” CR 62: 241–243.Google Scholar

Rambaud, M. 1966. “Note sur l’armée des gaules de 58 à 54.” IL 18: 21–25.Google Scholar

Rambaud, M. 1966a. L’art de la déformation historique dans les commentaires de César. 2nd ed. Paris.Google Scholar

Ramsey, J. T. 2000. “‘Beware the Ides of March’: An Astronomical Prediction?” CQ 50: 440–454.Google Scholar

Ramsey, J. T. 2003. Cicero: Philippics I–II. Cambridge.Google Scholar

Ramsey, J. T. 2004. “Did Julius Caesar Temporarily Banish Mark Antony from His Inner Circle?” CQ 54: 161–173.Google Scholar

Ramsey, J. T. 2007. Sallust’s Bellum Catilinae. 2nd ed. Oxford.Google Scholar

Ramsey, J. T. 2009. “The Proconsular Years: Politics at a Distance.” In Griffin, M. T. (ed.), A Companion to Julius Caesar. Malden, MA, and Oxford. 37–56.Google Scholar

Ramsey, J. T. 2013. Sallust: The War with Catiline, the War with Jugurtha. (Rev. Loeb ed.) Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar

Ramsey, J. T. 2016. “How and Why Was Pompey Made Sole Consul in 52 B.C.?” Historia 65: 298–324.Google Scholar

Ramsey, J. T. 2019. “The Date of the Consular Elections in 63 and the Inception of Catiline’s Conspiracy.” HSCPh 110: 213–269.Google Scholar

Ramsey, J. T. Forthcoming. Asconius: Commentaries on Speeches of Cicero (rev.). Oxford.Google Scholar

Ramsey, J. T., and Lewis Licht, A.. 1997. The Comet of 44 B.C. and Caesar’s Funeral Games. Atlanta.Google Scholar

Ramsey, J. T., and Raaflaub, K.. 2017. “Chronological Tables for Caesar’s Wars (58–45 BCE).” Histos 11: 162–217.Google Scholar

Rauh, S. 2012. “Suicide in the Roman Republic.” Diss. UCSB.Google Scholar

Rauh, S. 2018. “Cato at Utica: The Emergence of a Roman Suicide Tradition.” AJPh 139: 59–91.Google Scholar

Rawson, E. 1975. “Caesar’s Heritage. Hellenistic Kings and Their Roman Equals.”JRS 65: 148–159.Google Scholar

Rawson, E. 1982. “History, Historiography, and Cicero, Expositio Consiliorum Suorum.” LCM 7: 121–124.Google Scholar

Rawson, E. 1991. Roman Culture and Society: Collected Papers. Oxford.Google Scholar

Renehan, R. 1969. Greek Textual Criticism: A Reader. Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar

Rice Holmes, T. 1911. Caesar’s Conquest of Gaul. 2nd ed. Oxford.Google Scholar

Rice Holmes, T. 1923. The Roman Republic and the Founder of the Empire. 3 vols. Oxford.Google Scholar

Rich, J. W. 1976. Declaring War in the Roman Republic in the Period of Transmarine Expansion. Coll. Latomus 149. Brussels.Google Scholar

Rich, J. W. 2014. “The Triumph in the Roman Republic: Frequency, Fluctuation and Policy.” In Lang, C. H. and Vervaet, F. J. (eds.), The Roman Republican Triumph beyond the Spectacle. Rome. 197–258.Google Scholar

Richardson, J. S. 1996. The Romans in Spain. Oxford and Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar

Richardson, J. S. 2008. The Language of Empire: Rome and the Idea of Empire from the Third Century BC to the Second Century AD. Cambridge.Google Scholar

Rickman, G. 1980. The Corn Supply of Ancient Rome. Oxford.Google Scholar

Ridley, M. 1996. The Origins of Virtue: Human Instincts and the Evolution of Cooperation. New York.Google Scholar

Ridley, R. 2000. “The Dictator’s Mistake. Caesar’s Escape from Sulla.” Historia 49: 211–229.Google Scholar

Ridley, R. 2004. “Attacking the World with Five Cohorts.” AS 34: 127–152.Google Scholar

Riggsby, A. 2006. Caesar in Gaul and Rome: War in Words. Austin, TX.Google Scholar

Rising, T. 2013. “Senatorial Opposition to Pompey’s Eastern Settlement. A Storm in a Teacup?” Historia 62: 196–221.Google Scholar

Rising, T. 2015. “Caesar’s Offer, Cicero’s Rebuff, and the Two Land Commissions of 59 B.C.” Historia 64: 419–427.Google Scholar

Robb, M. A. 2010. Beyond Populares and Optimates: Political Language in the Late Republic. Stuttgart.Google Scholar

Robinson, O. 1992. Ancient Rome: City Planning and Administration. New York.Google Scholar

Rodgers, B. S. 2008. “Catulus’ Speech in Cassius Dio 36.31–36.” GRBS 48: 295–318.Google Scholar

Roller, M. B. 2001. Constructing Autocracy: Aristocrats and Emperors in Julio-Claudian Rome. Princeton.Google Scholar

Rondholz, A. 2009. “Crossing the Rubicon: A Historiographical Study.” Mnemosyne 62: 432–450.Google Scholar

Roselaar, S. T. 2010. Public Land in the Roman Republic: A Social and Economic History of Ager Publicus in Italy, 396–89 BC. Oxford.Google Scholar

Rosenblitt, J. A. 2016. “Hostile Politics: Sallust and the Rhetoric of Popular Champions in the Late Republic.” AJPh 137: 655–688.Google Scholar