Book contents
- Judicial Selection in the States
- Judicial Selection in the States
- Copyright page
- Dedication
- Contents
- Figures
- Tables
- Preface
- Table of Cases
- 1 Introduction
- Part I Change as an Exercise in Partisan Politics
- Part II Change as Court Modernization or Good Government
- 6 Georgia
- 7 Mississippi
- 8 Utah
- 9 New Mexico
- 10 Connecticut, Rhode Island, and South Carolina
- Part III Unsuccessful Change Efforts
- Index
9 - New Mexico
Finding Its Own Unique Approach
from Part II - Change as Court Modernization or Good Government
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 06 April 2020
- Judicial Selection in the States
- Judicial Selection in the States
- Copyright page
- Dedication
- Contents
- Figures
- Tables
- Preface
- Table of Cases
- 1 Introduction
- Part I Change as an Exercise in Partisan Politics
- Part II Change as Court Modernization or Good Government
- 6 Georgia
- 7 Mississippi
- 8 Utah
- 9 New Mexico
- 10 Connecticut, Rhode Island, and South Carolina
- Part III Unsuccessful Change Efforts
- Index
Summary
Efforts to end the use of partisan elections for judicial selection and retention in New Mexico date back to the 1930s. Twice, the state legislatures sent voters a constitutional amendment that included a Missouri Plan system, in 1951 and again in 1982, but both times the voters rejected it. In 1988, the legislature and voters approved a new system that retained an element of partisan elections; approval occurred despite that it again raised the specter of voters surrendering their power to select judges. In principle, all vacancies are now filled by gubernatorial appointment from a short list provided by a nominating commission. However, appointees must stand in a partisan election at the first general election after their appointment; this includes the need to obtain the nomination of a political party. After winning a partisan election, either as the appointed incumbent or as the challenger, judges stand for subsequent terms in retention elections. There is still an occasional open-seat election when an appointee fails to obtain the nomination of his or her political party.
Keywords
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- Judicial Selection in the StatesPolitics and the Struggle for Reform, pp. 184 - 203Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2020