Book contents
- Judicial Selection in the States
- Judicial Selection in the States
- Copyright page
- Dedication
- Contents
- Figures
- Tables
- Preface
- Table of Cases
- 1 Introduction
- Part I Change as an Exercise in Partisan Politics
- Part II Change as Court Modernization or Good Government
- Part III Unsuccessful Change Efforts
- 11 Florida and South Dakota
- 12 Nevada and Ohio
- 13 Minnesota, Pennsylvania, Texas, and New Hampshire
- 14 Missouri, Kansas, and Oklahoma
- 15 Conclusion
- Index
11 - Florida and South Dakota
Unsuccessful Efforts to Extend the Missouri Plan
from Part III - Unsuccessful Change Efforts
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 06 April 2020
- Judicial Selection in the States
- Judicial Selection in the States
- Copyright page
- Dedication
- Contents
- Figures
- Tables
- Preface
- Table of Cases
- 1 Introduction
- Part I Change as an Exercise in Partisan Politics
- Part II Change as Court Modernization or Good Government
- Part III Unsuccessful Change Efforts
- 11 Florida and South Dakota
- 12 Nevada and Ohio
- 13 Minnesota, Pennsylvania, Texas, and New Hampshire
- 14 Missouri, Kansas, and Oklahoma
- 15 Conclusion
- Index
Summary
The voters in both Florida and South Dakota approved the adoption of a Missouri Plan system for appellate courts, Florida in the 1970s and South Dakota in 1980. Voters in both states later rejected extending the system to trial courts. The adoption of the Missouri Plan for Florida’s appellate courts in 1976 came in the wake of a series of scandals involving the justices of the Florida Supreme Court. Two years later and then again 22 years later, Florida’s Constitution Revision Commission put the question of whether to extend the Missouri Plan to the trial courts before the voters, who then rejected the proposed change. The impetus for change in selection/retention of South Dakota’s Supreme Court justices appears to have come largely from the state bar. In 1980, the voters approved a Missouri Plan system for the South Dakota Supreme Court and did not divide along party lines. In the early 2000s, a proposal to extend the system to the trial courts was presented to the voters, who rejected the proposal.
Keywords
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- Judicial Selection in the StatesPolitics and the Struggle for Reform, pp. 241 - 266Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2020