Aalberts, TE and Venzke, I (2017), ‘Moving beyond Interdisciplinary Turf Wars: Towards an Understanding of International Law as Practice’ in d’Aspremont, et al. (eds.), International Law as a Profession (Cambridge University Press)Google Scholar

Abbott, KW (2008), ‘Enriching Rational Choice Institutionalism for the Study of International Law’, University of Illinois Law Review 5Google Scholar

Abi-Saab, G (1996), ‘The International Court as a World Court’ in Lowe, and Fitzmaurice, (eds.), Fifty Years of the International Court of Justice (Cambridge University Press)Google Scholar

Adede, AO (1977a), ‘International Law and Property of Aliens: The Old Order Changeth’, 19 Malaya Law Review 175Google Scholar

Adede, AO (1977b), ‘A Survey of Treaty Provisions on the Rule of Exhaustion of Local Remedies’, 18 Harvard International Law Journal 1Google Scholar

Adler, MH (1990), ‘The Exhaustion of the Local Remedies Rule after the International Court of Justice’s Decision in ELSI’, 39 International & Comparative Law Quarterly 641Google Scholar

Ahdieh, R (2004), ‘Between Dialogue and Decree: International Review of National Courts’, 79 New York University Law Review 2029Google Scholar

Ajevski, M (2014), ‘Unstable Identities: The European Court of Human Rights and the Margin of Appreciation’, University of Oslo Faculty of Law Research Paper Series, Paper No. 2014-34Google Scholar

Akinsanya, AA (1980), The Expropriation of Multinational Property in the Third World (Praeger)Google Scholar

Alexander, L and Schauer, F (1997), ‘On Extrajudicial Constitutional Interpretation’, 110 Harvard Law Review 1359Google Scholar

Alexy, R (2009), A Theory of Constitutional Rights (Oxford University Press)Google Scholar

Alford, R (2002), ‘Federal Courts, International Tribunals, and the Continuum of Deference’, 43 Virginia Journal of International Law 675Google Scholar

Allan, TRS (2006), ‘Human Rights and Judicial Review: A Critique of “Due Deference”’, 65 Cambridge Law Journal 671Google Scholar

Allan, TRS (2010), ‘Deference, Defiance, and Doctrine: Defining the Limits of Judicial Review’, 60 University of Toronto Law Review 41CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Allan, TRS (2011), ‘Judicial Deference and Judicial Review: Legal Doctrine and Legal Theory’, 127 Law Quarterly Review 96Google Scholar

Allars, M (1994), ‘On Deference to Tribunals, with Deference to Dworkin’, 20 Queen’s Law Journal 163Google Scholar

Allen, T (2005a), Property and the Human Rights Act 1998 (Hart)Google Scholar

Allen, T (2005b), ‘Transitional Justice and the Right to Property under the European Convention on Human Rights’, 16 Stellenbosch Law Review 413Google Scholar

Allen, T (2007), ‘Compensation for Property under the European Convention on Human Rights’, 28 Michigan Journal of International Law 287Google Scholar

Allen, T (2010), ‘Liberalism, Social Democracy and the Value of Property under the European Convention on Human Rights’, 59 International & Comparative Law Quarterly 1055CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Allison, JWF (1994), ‘Fuller’s Analysis of Polycentric Disputes and the Limits of Adjudication’, 53 Cambridge Law Journal 367CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Allott, P (1999), ‘International Law and the Idea of History’, 1 Journal of the History of International Law 1CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Alschner, W (2014), ‘The Return of the Home State and the Rise of ‘Embedded’ Investor-State Arbitration’ in Lalani, and Lazo, (eds.), The Role of the State in Investor-State Arbitration (Martinus Nijhoff)Google Scholar

Alter, K (2008a), ‘Agents or Trustees? International Courts in Their Political Context’, 14 European Journal of International Relations 33CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Alter, K (2008b), ‘Delegating to International Courts: Self-Binding vs. Other-Binding Delegation’, 71 Law & Contemporary Problems 37Google Scholar

Alter, K (2011), ‘The Evolving International Judiciary’, 7 Annual Review of Law and Social Science 387Google Scholar

Alter, K (2014), The New Terrain of International Law: Courts, Politics, Rights (Princeton University Press)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Alter, K, Helfer, L and Madsen, MR (2016), ‘How Context Shapes the Authority of International Courts’, 79 Law and Contemporary Problems 1Google Scholar

Alvarez, JE (2006), International Organizations as Law-Makers (Oxford University Press)Google Scholar

Alvarez, JE (2016), ‘Is Investor-State Arbitration “Public”?’, 7 Journal of International Dispute Settlement 534CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Alvik, I (2010), ‘The Hybrid Nature of Investment Treaty Arbitration: Straddling the National/International Divide’ in Eriksen, and Emberland, (eds.), The New International Law: An Anthology (Martinus Nijhoff)Google Scholar

Alvik, I (2018), ‘Protection of Private Property in the Early Law of Nations’, 20 Journal of the History of International Law 217Google Scholar

Amaza, IP (2012), ‘Multiplicity of International Dispute Settlement Forums: Avoiding the Risk of Parallel Proceedings’, 6 Dispute Resolution International 149Google Scholar

Ambrus, M (2013), ‘The European Court of Human Rights and Standards of Proof in Religion Cases’, 8 Religion and Human Rights 107CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Amerasinghe, CF (2008), Diplomatic Protection (Oxford University Press)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

American Bar Association (2016), Investment Treaty Working Group: Task Force Report on the Investment Court System ProposalGoogle Scholar

Anand, RP (1963), ‘The International Court of Justice and Impartiality between Nations’, 12 Indian Year Book of International Affairs 12Google Scholar

Anand, RP (1965), ‘The Role of Individual and Dissenting Opinions in International Adjudication’, 14 International & Comparative Law Quarterly 788CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Anand, RP (1969), Studies in International Adjudication (Oceana Publications Inc.)Google Scholar

Anthony, R (1998), ‘Which Agency Interpretations Should Get Judicial Deference? A Preliminary Inquiry’, 40 Administrative Law Review 121Google Scholar

Anzilotti, D (1928), Corso Di Diritto Internazionale (3rd edn, Athenaeum)Google Scholar

Arai, Y (1998), ‘The Margin of Appreciation Doctrine in the Jurisprudence of Article 8 of the European Convention on Human Rights’, 16 Netherlands Quarterly of Human Rights 41Google Scholar

Arai-Takahashi, Y (2002), The Margin of Appreciation Doctrine and the Principle of Proportionality in the Jurisprudence of the ECHR (Intersentia)Google Scholar

Arangio-Ruiz, G (1990), ‘Le Domaine Reserve: L’Organisation Internationale et Le Rapport Entre Droit International et Droit Interne’, Collected Courses of the Hague Academy of International Law, vol. 225Google Scholar

Arangio-Ruiz, G (1996), ‘The Plea of Domestic Jurisdiction before the International Court of Justice: Substance or Procedure?’ in Lowe, and Fitzmaurice, (eds.), Fifty Years of the International Court of Justice: Essays in Honour of Sir Robert Jennings (Cambridge University Press)Google Scholar

Arato, J (2014), ‘The Margin of Appreciation in International Investment Law’, 54 Virginia Journal of International Law 2Google Scholar

Arendt, H (2006), Between Past and Future: Eight Exercises in Political Thought (Penguin Books)Google Scholar

Arnardóttir, OM (2015), ‘Organised Retreat? The Move from “Substantive” to “Procedural” Review in the ECtHR’s Case Law on the Margin of Appreciation’, European Society of International Law Conference Paper No. 4/2015Google Scholar

Arnardóttir, OM (2017), ‘The “Procedural Turn” under the European Convention on Human Rights and Presumptions of Convention Compliance’, 15 International Journal of Constitutional Law 9Google Scholar

Arndt, JD (1959), ‘International Court of Justice – Legal Effect, Constitutional and International, of the Connally Reservation’, 28 University of Kansas Law Review 1Google Scholar

Ashforth, BE and Gibbs, BW (1990), ‘The Double-Edge of Organizational Legitimation’, 1 Organization Science 177CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Atik, J (2003), ‘Repenser NAFTA Chapter 11: A Catalogue of Legitimacy Critiques’, 3 Asper Review of International Business and Trade Law 215Google Scholar

Austin, J (1885), Lectures on Jurisprudence: Or, the Philosophy of Positive Law, vol. 2 (5th edn, Lawbook Exchange Ltd)Google Scholar

Ayres, L, Kavanaugh, K and Knafl, K (2003), ‘Within-Case and Across-Case Approaches to Qualitative Data Analysis’, 13 Qualitative Health Research 871Google Scholar

Baker, P (2006), Using Corpora in Discourse Analysis (Continuum)Google Scholar

Balcerzak, M (2004), ‘The Doctrine of Precedent in the International Court of Justice and the European Court of Human Rights’, 27 Polish Yearbook of International Law 131Google Scholar

Balkin, JM (1996), ‘A Night in the Topics: The Reason of Legal Rhetoric and the Rhetoric of Legal Reason’ in Brooks, and Gewirtz, (eds.), Law’s Stories: Narrative and Rhetoric in the Law (Yale University Press)Google Scholar

Banakar, R and Travers, M (eds.) (2013), Law and Social Theory (2nd edn, Hart)Google Scholar

Bankowski Z, MacCormick N, Summers R, and Jerzy W (1991), ‘On Method and Methodology’, in N MacCormick and R Summers (eds), Interpreting Statutes: A Comparative Study (Dartmouth)Google Scholar

Banks, K (1999), ‘NAFTA’s Article 1110 – Can Regulation Be Expropriation?’, 5 NAFTA: Law & Business Review of the Americas 499Google Scholar

Barkhuysen, T and van Emmerik, M (2009), ‘Legitimacy of European Court of Human Rights Judgments: Procedural Aspects’ in Huls, et al. (eds.), The Legitimacy of Highest Courts’ Ruling (TMC Asser Press)Google Scholar

Barnett, M and Finnemore, M (2004), Rules for the World: International Organizations in Global Politics (Cornell University Press)Google Scholar

Barrie, G (1995), ‘International Human Rights Conventions: Public International Law Applicable to the Protection of Rights’, Journal of South African Law 66Google Scholar

Beck, G (2007), ‘The Idea of Human Rights between Value Pluralism and Conceptual Vagueness’, 25 Penn State International Law Review 615Google Scholar

Bedjaoui, M (1991), ‘The “Manufacture” of Judgments at the International Court of Justice’, 3 Pace Yearbook of International Law 29CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Behn, D, Langford, M and Laudal Berge, T (2018), ‘Development or Democracy? Explaining Outcomes in Investment Treaty Arbitration, 38(3) Northwestern Journal of International Law & Business 333Google Scholar

Bellamy, R (2014), ‘The Democratic Legitimacy of International Human Rights Conventions: Political Constitutionalism and the European Convention on Human Rights’, 25 European Journal of International Law 1019Google Scholar

Bemelmans-Videc M (2011), ‘Guaranteeing the Authority and Effectiveness of the European Convention on Human Rights’ AS/Jur 44 Committee on Legal Affairs and Human RightsGoogle Scholar

Benhabib, S (2009), ‘Claiming Rights across Borders: International Human Rights and Democratic Sovereignty’, 103 American Political Science Review 691Google Scholar

Bennouna, M (2014), ‘The International Court of Justice: Bestriding Past and Present’ in Gaja, Grote Stoutenburg, (eds.), Enhancing the Rule of Law through the International Court of Justice (Brill)Google Scholar

Benvenisti, E (1999), ‘Margin of Appreciation, Consensus, and Universal Standards’, 31 New York University Journal of International Law and Politics 843Google Scholar

Benvenisti, E (2013), ‘Sovereigns as Trustees of Humanity: On the Accountability of States to Foreign Stakeholders’, 107 American Journal of International Law 295Google Scholar

Benvenisti, E (2018), ‘The Margin of Appreciation, Subsidiarity and Global Challenges to Democracy’, 9 Journal of International Dispute Settlement 240Google Scholar

Benvenisti, E and Harel, A (2017), ‘Embracing the Tension between National and International Human Rights Law: The Case for Discordant Parity’, 15(1) International Journal of Constitutional Law 36Google Scholar

Berg, BL and Lune, H (2014), Qualitative Research Methods for the Social Sciences (8th edn, Pearson)Google Scholar

Bergbohm, C (1877), Staatsverträge Und Gesetze Als Quellen Des Völkerrechts (Mattiesen)Google Scholar

Berman, F (2013a), ‘Fair and Equitable Treatment: A Rejoinder to Martins Paparinskis’ EJIL: Talk!Google Scholar

Berman, PS (2007), ‘A Pluralist Approach to International Law’, 32 Yale Journal of International Law 301Google Scholar

Berman, PS (2008), ‘Federalism and International Law Through the Lens of Legal Pluralism’, 73 Missouri Law Review 1149Google Scholar

Berman, PS (2012), Global Legal Pluralism: A Jurisprudence of Law Beyond Borders (Cambridge University Press)Google Scholar

Berman, PS (2013), ‘Jurisgenerative Constitutionalism: Procedural Principles for Managing Global Legal Pluralism’, 20 Indiana Journal of Global Legal Studies 665Google Scholar

Bernhardt, R (1993), ‘The Convention and Domestic Law’ in Macdonald, et al. (eds.), The European System for the Protection of Human Rights (Martinus Nijhoff)Google Scholar

Besson, S (2009), ‘The Authority of International Law – Lifting the State Veil’, 31 Sydney Law Review 343Google Scholar

Besson, S (2011), ‘International Judges as Dispute-Settlers and Law-Enforcers: From International Law without Courts to International Courts without Law; A Reply to Anna Spain’, 34 Loyola of Los Angeles International and Comparative Law Review 33Google Scholar

Bickel, AM (1962), The Least Dangerous Branch: The Supreme Court at the Bar of Politics (Yale University Press)Google Scholar

Bilder, R (1982), ‘Some Limitations of Adjudication as an International Dispute Settlement Technique’, 23 Virginia Journal of International Law 1Google Scholar

Bilder, R (2007), ‘Adjudication: International Arbitral Tribunals and Courts’ in Zartman, (ed.), Peacemaking in International Conflict: Methods and Techniques (United States Institute of Peace)Google Scholar

Bilkova, V (2014), ‘The Standard of Equivalent Protection as a Standard of Review’ in Gruszczynski, and Werner, (eds.), Deference in International Courts and Tribunals: Standard of Review and Margin of Appreciation (Oxford University Press)Google Scholar

Bjørge, E and Miles, CA (eds.) (2017), Landmark Cases in Public International Law (Hart)Google Scholar

Bjorklund, A (2004), ‘Waiver and the Exhaustion of Local Remedies Rule in NAFTA Jurisprudence’ in Weiler (ed.), NAFTA Investment Law and Arbitration: Past Issues, Current Practice, Future ProspectsGoogle Scholar

Bjorklund, A (2007), ‘Private Rights and Public International Law: Why Competition among International Economic Law Tribunals Is Not Working’, 59 Hastings Law Journal 241Google Scholar

Blades, BW (2006) ‘The Exhausting Question of Local Remedies: Expropriation under NAFTA Chapter 11’, Oregon Review of International Law 31Google Scholar

Block-Lieb, S and Halliday, T (2007), ‘Incrementalisms in Global Lawmaking’, 32(3) Brooklyn Journal of International Law 851Google Scholar

Bodansky, D (1999), ‘The Legitimacy of International Governance: A Coming Challenge for International Environmental Law?’, 93 American Journal of International Law 596Google Scholar

Bodansky, D (2006), ‘International Law in Black and White’, 34 Georgia Journal of International and Comparative Law 285Google Scholar

Bodansky, D (2007), ‘The Concept of Legitimacy in International Law’ in Wolfrum, and Röben, (eds.), Legitimacy in International Law (Springer)Google Scholar

Bodansky, D (2012), ‘Legitimacy in International Law and International Relations’ in Dunoff, and Pollack, (eds.), Interdisciplinary Perspectives on International Law and International Relations: The State of the Art (Cambridge University Press)Google Scholar

Bodie, TJ (1995), Politics and the Emergence of an Activist International Court of Justice (Greenwood Publishing Group)Google Scholar

Bodin J (1576), Six Books of the Commonwealth (translated by M.J. Tooley) (Blackwell Oxford)Google Scholar

Bomhoff, J (2010), ‘Genealogies of Balancing as Discourse’, 4 Law & Ethics of Human Rights 109Google Scholar

Bonnitcha, J (2014), Substantive Protection under Investment Treaties: A Legal and Economic Analysis (Cambridge University Press)Google Scholar

Borchard, E (1919), The Diplomatic Protection of Citizens Abroad (Banks Law Publishing Co.)Google Scholar

Boyatzis, RE (1998), Transforming Qualitative Information: Thematic Analysis and Code Development (Sage Publications)Google Scholar

Bradley, C and Kelley, J (2008), ‘The Concept of International Delegation’, 71 Law and Contemporary Problems 1Google Scholar

Brems, E (1996), ‘The Margin of Appreciation Doctrine in the Case-Law of the European Court of Human Rights’, 56 Zeitschrift für Ausländisches Öffentliches Recht und Volkerrecht 230Google Scholar

Brems, E (2017), ‘The “Logics” of Procedural-Type Review by the European Court of Human Rights’ in Brems, and Gerards, (eds.), Procedural Review in European Fundamental Rights Cases (Cambridge University Press)Google Scholar

Brems, E and Gerards, J (eds.) (2017), Procedural Review in European Fundamental Rights Cases (Cambridge University Press)Google Scholar

Brems, E and Lavrysen, L (2013), ‘Procedural Justice in Human Rights Adjudication: The European Court of Human Rights’, 35 Human Rights Quarterly 176Google Scholar

Brems, E and Lavrysen, L (2015), ‘“Don’t Use a Sledgehammer to Crack a Nut”: Less Restrictive Means in the Case Law of the European Court of Human Rights’, 15 Human Rights Law Review 139Google Scholar

Brierly, JL (1925), ‘Matters of Domestic Jurisdiction’, 6 British Yearbook of International Law 8Google Scholar

Briggs, H (1960), ‘Confidence, Apprehension and the International Court of Justice’, 54 American Society of International Law Proceedings 25Google Scholar

Bring, OE (1980), ‘The Impact of Developing States on International Customary Law Concerning Protection of Foreign Property’, 24 Scandinavian Studies in Law 97Google Scholar

Brisbane Telegraph (1927), ‘League of Nations: How It Can Fail - University Lecture’ (Trove)Google Scholar

Brölmann, C (2007), ‘Deterritorialization in International Law: Moving Away from the Divide Between National and International Law’ in Nijman, and Nollkaemper, (eds.), New Perspectives on the Divide Between National and International Law (Oxford University Press)Google Scholar

Brölmann, C (2013), ‘The Permanent Court of International Justice and the International Rights of Groups and Individuals’ in Tams and Fitzmaurice (eds.), Legacies of the Permanent Court of International Justice (Martinus Nijhoff)Google Scholar

Broude, T (2012), ‘The Constitutional Function of Contemporary International Tribunals, or Kelsen’s Visions Vindicated’, 4 Goettingen Journal of International Law 519Google Scholar

Broude, T (2016), ‘Selective Subsidiarity and Dialectic Deference in the World Trade Organization’, 79 Law and Contemporary Problems 53Google Scholar

Brown, C (2002), ‘Review Essay – The Proliferation of International Courts and Tribunals: Finding Your Way through the Maze’, 3 Melbourne Journal of International Law 453Google Scholar

Brown, MB (2014), ‘Expertise and Deliberative Democracy’ in Elstub, and McLaverty, (eds.), Deliberative Democracy (Edinburgh University Press)Google Scholar

Brownlee, K (2004), ‘Obedience, Conformity, and Deference’, 10 Res Publica 267Google Scholar

Brownlie, I (1963), ‘The Relations of Nationality in Public International Law’, 39 British Yearbook of International Law 284Google Scholar

Brownlie, I (1967),‘The Justiciability of Disputes and Issues in International Relations’, 42 British Yearbook of International Law 123Google Scholar

Brownlie, I (1998), Principles of Public International Law (5th edn, Oxford University Press)Google Scholar

Brunnée, J and Toope, SJ (2000), ‘International Law and Constructivism: Elements of an International Theory of International Law’, 39 Columbia Journal of Transnational Law 19Google Scholar

Brunnée, J and Toope, SJ (2010), Legitimacy and Legality in International Law: An Interactional Account (Cambridge University Press)Google Scholar

Bryman, A and Burgess, RG (eds.) (2000), Analyzing Qualitative Data (Routledge)Google Scholar

Buchanan, A (2003), Justice, Legitimacy, and Self-Determination (Oxford University Press)Google Scholar

Buchanan, A and Keohane, RO (2006), ‘The Legitimacy of Global Governance Institutions’, 20 Ethics & International Affairs 405Google Scholar

Buchanan, R (2009), ‘Reconceptualising Law and Politics in the Transnational Constitutional and Legal Pluralist Approaches’, 5 Socio-Legal Review 21Google Scholar

Bücheler, G (2015), Proportionality in Investor-State Arbitration (Oxford University Press)Google Scholar

Bultrini, A (2010), ‘The European Convention on Human Rights and the Rule of Prior Exhaustion of Domestic Remedies in International Law’, 20 Italian Yearbook of International Law 101Google Scholar

Burke-White, WW (2008a), ‘The Argentine Financial Crisis: State Liability under BITs and the Legitimacy of the ICSID System’, 3 Asian Journal of WTO and International Health Law and Policy 199Google Scholar

Burke-White, WW (2008b), ‘Proactive Complementarity: The International Criminal Court and National Courts in the Rome System of International Justice’, 49 Harvard International Law Journal 53Google Scholar

Burke-White, WW and von Staden, A (2008), ‘Investment Protection in Extraordinary Times: The Interpretation and Application of Non-Precluded Measures Provisions in Bilateral Investment Treaties’, 48 Virginia Journal of International Law 307Google Scholar

Burke-White, WW and von Staden, A (2010), ‘Private Litigation in a Public Law Sphere: The Standard of Review in Investor-State Arbitrations’, 35 Yale Journal of International Law 283Google Scholar

Butler, N (2013), ‘Possible Improvements to the Framework of International Investment Arbitration’, 14 Journal of World Investment & Trade 613Google Scholar

Calvert, C and Hayes, J (2012), ‘To Defer or Not to Defer? Deference and Its Differential Impact on First Amendment Rights in the Roberts Court’, 63 Case Western Reserve Law Review 13Google Scholar

Candia, G (2014), ‘Comparing Diverse Approaches to the Margin of Appreciation: The Case of the European and the Inter-American Court of Human Rights’ Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile, Law School Working Paper Series, Paper No. 2014/01Google Scholar

Caporaso, JA (2000), ‘Changes in the Westphalian Order: Territory, Public Authority, and Sovereignty’, 2 International Studies Review 1Google Scholar

Cardozo, B (1947), ‘Law and Literature’ in Hall, and Patterson, (eds.), Selected Writings of Benjamin Nathan Cardozo (Fallon Publications)Google Scholar

Carolan, E (2009), The New Separation of Powers (Oxford University Press)Google Scholar

Caron, DD (1991), ‘Comparative Analysis of International Dispute Resolution Institutions’, 85 Proceedings of the Annual Meeting (American Society of International Law) 65Google Scholar

Caron, DD (1992), ‘Reputation and Reality in the ICSID Annulment Process: Understanding the Distinction between Annulment and Appeal’, 7 ICSID Review – Foreign Investment Law Journal 21Google Scholar

Caron, DD (1993), ‘The Legitimacy of the Collective Authority of the Security Council’, 87 American Journal of International Law 552Google Scholar

Caron, DD (2000), ‘War and International Adjudication: Reflections on the 1899 Peace Conference’, 94 American Journal of International Law 4Google Scholar

Caron, DD (2007a), ‘Towards a Political Theory of International Courts and Tribunals’, 24 Berkeley Journal of International Law 401Google Scholar

Caron, DD (2007b), ‘The Iran-US Claims Tribunal and Investment Arbitration: Understanding the Claims Settlement Declaration as a Retrospective BIT’ in Drahozal, and Gibson, (eds.), The Iran-US Claims Tribunal at 25 (Oxford University Press)Google Scholar

Caron, DD (2012), ‘Framing the Work of ICSID Annulment Committees’, 6 World Arbitration & Mediation Review 173Google Scholar

Caron, DD (2014), ‘International Claims and Compensation Bodies’ in Romano et al. (eds.), International Claims and Compensation Bodies 279Google Scholar

Caron, DD (2015), ‘The United Nations Compensation Commission: Understanding an Institution and the Three Phases of Its Work’ in Feighery, et al. (eds.), War Reparations and the UN Compensation Commission: Designing Compensation After Conflict (Oxford University Press)Google Scholar

Caron, DD and Shirlow, E (2015), ‘Most-Favored-Nation Treatment: Substantive Protection’ in Kinnear, et al. (eds.), Building International Investment Law: The First 50 Years of ICSID (Wolters Kluwer)Google Scholar

Caron, DD and Shirlow, E (2018), ‘Dissecting Backlash: The Unarticulated Causes of Backlash and its Unintended Consequences’ in Ulfstein, and Føllesdal, (eds.), The Judicialization of International Law – A Mixed Blessing? (Oxford University Press)Google Scholar

Caron, DD and Shirlow, E (2019), ‘Article 25(2)(b)’ in Fouret, et al. (eds.), The ICSID Convention, Rules and Regulations: A Practical Commentary (Edward Elgar)Google Scholar

Carter, Jr W (2008), ‘Rethinking Subsidiarity in International Human Rights Adjudication’, 30 Hamline Journal of Public Law and Policy 319Google Scholar

Casas, M (2016), ‘Nationalities of Convenience, Personal Jurisdiction, and Access to Investor-State Dispute Settlement’, 49 International Law and Politics 63Google Scholar

Casini, L (2014), ‘“Down the Rabbit-Hole”: The Projection of the Public/Private Distinction beyond the State’, 12 International Journal of Constitutional Law 402Google Scholar

Cass, D (1996), ‘Navigating the Newstream: Recent Critical Scholarship in International Law’, 65 Nordic Journal of International Law 341Google Scholar

Cass, D (2001), ‘The “Constitutionalisation” of International Trade Law: Judicial Norm-Generation as the Engine of Constitutional Development in International Trade’, 12 European Journal of International Law 39Google Scholar

Cassese, A (1990), ‘Remarks on Scelle’s Theory of “Role Splitting” (Dedoublement Fonctionnel) in International Law’, 1 European Journal of International Law 210Google Scholar

Caudle, S (2010), ‘Qualitative Data Analysis’ in Wholey, et al. (eds.), Handbook of Practical Program Evaluation (Jossey-Bass)Google Scholar

Charlotin, D (2017), ‘US Court Declines to Set Aside Mesa v. Canada Award’ IAReporterGoogle Scholar

Chen, T (2012), ‘The Standard of Review and the Roles of ICSID Arbitral Tribunals in Investor-State Dispute Settlement’, 5 Contemporary Asia Arbitration Journal 23Google Scholar

Cheng, B (2006), General Principles of Law as Applied by International Courts and Tribunals (1st edn, Cambridge University Press)Google Scholar

Chesney, R (2006), ‘Disaggregating Deference: The Judicial Power and Executive Treaty Interpretations’, 92 Iowa Law Review 1723Google Scholar

Cheyne, I (2014), ‘Deference and the Use of the Public Policy Exception in International Courts and Tribunals’ in Gruszczynski, and Werner, (eds.), Deference in International Courts and Tribunals: Standard of Review and Margin of Appreciation (Oxford University Press)Google Scholar

Christiano, T (2010), ‘Democratic Legitimacy and International Institutions’ in Besson, and Tasioulas, (eds.), The Philosophy of International Law (Oxford University Press) 119Google Scholar

Christiano, T (2012), Authority (Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy)Google Scholar

Christie, GC (1962), ‘What Constitutes a Taking of Property under International Law?’, 38 British Yearbook of International Law 307Google Scholar

Christoffersen, J and Madsen, MR (eds.) (2011), The European Court of Human Rights between Law and Politics (Oxford University Press)Google Scholar

Christoffersen, J and Madsen, MR (2013), ‘Postscript: Understanding the Past, Present, and Future of the European Court of Human Rights’ in Christoffersen, and Madsen, (eds.), The European Court of Human Rights between Law and Politics (2nd edn, Oxford University Press)Google Scholar

Christol, C (1959), ‘The Jurisdiction of the International Court of Justice’, 33 Southern California Law Review 378Google Scholar

Clark, I (2007), International Legitimacy and World Society (Oxford University Press)Google Scholar

Clayton, R (2004), ‘Judicial Deference and “Democratic Dialogue”: The Legitimacy of Judicial Intervention under the Human Rights Act 1998’, Public Law 33Google Scholar

Clayton, R (2006), ‘Principles for Judicial Deference’, 11 Judicial Review 109Google Scholar

Clayton, R and Ghaly, K (2007), ‘Shifting Standards of Review’, 12 Judicial Review 210Google Scholar

Coe, Jr JJ (2003), ‘Taking Stock of NAFTA Chapter 11 in Its Tenth Year: An Interim Sketch of Selected Themes, Issues, and Methods’, 36 Vanderbilt Journal of Transnational Law 1381Google Scholar

Cohen, HG (2009), ‘Can International Law Work? A Constructivist Expansion’, 27 Berkeley Journal of International Law 636Google Scholar

Cohen, HG (2010), ‘From International Law to International Conflicts of Law: The Fragmentation of Legitimacy’, 104 American Society of International Law Proceedings 49Google Scholar

Cohen, HG (2012a), ‘Finding International Law, Part II: Our Fragmenting Legal Community’, 44 New York University Journal of International Law and Politics 1049Google Scholar

Cohen, HG (2012b), ‘From Fragmentation to Constitutionalization’, 24 Pacific McGeorge Global Business & Development Law Journal 381Google Scholar

Cohen, HG (2015), ‘International Precedent and the Practice of International Law’ in Helfand, (ed.) (Cambridge University Press)172Google Scholar

Cohen, J (2010), ‘Sovereignty in the Context of Globalization: A Constitutional Pluralist Perspective’ in Besson, and Tasioulas, (eds.), The Philosophy of International Law (Oxford University Press)Google Scholar

Cohen, M (1927), ‘Property and Sovereignty’, 13 Cornell Law Quarterly 8Google Scholar

Cohen-Eliya, M and Porat, I (2011), ‘Proportionality and the Culture of Justification’, 59 American Journal of Comparative Law 463Google Scholar

Colangelo, AJ (2009), ‘Universal Jurisdiction as an International “False Conflict” of Laws’, 30 Michigan Journal of International Law 881Google Scholar

Colangelo, AJ (2016), ‘A Systems Theory of Fragmentation and Harmonization’, 49 International Law and Politics 1Google Scholar

Collins, D (2016), ‘The Line of Equilibrium: Improving the Legitimacy of Investment Treaty Arbitration through the Application of the WTO’s General Exceptions’, 32 Arbitration International 575Google Scholar

Colwell, B (2007), ‘Deference or Respect? Status Management Practices Among Prison Inmates’, 70 Social Psychology Quarterly 442Google Scholar

Contreras, P (2012), ‘National Discretion and International Deference in the Restriction of Human Rights: A Comparison Between the Jurisprudence of the European and the Inter-American Court of Human Rights’, 11 Northwestern Journal of International Human Rights 28Google Scholar

Coquiz, J (1977), ‘The Problem of Jurisdiction of the International Court of Justice’, 52 Philippine Law Journal 154Google Scholar

Costa, J-P (2011), ‘On the Legitimacy of the European Court of Human Rights’ Judgments’, 7 European Constitutional Law Review 173Google Scholar

Cottier, T et al., (2017) ‘The Principle of Proportionality in International Law: Foundations and Variations’, 18 Journal of World Investment & Trade 628CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Cotula, L (2015), ‘Property in a Shrinking Planet: Fault Lines in International Human Rights and Investment Law’, 11 International Journal of Law in Context 113Google Scholar

Cotula, L (2017), ‘Democracy and International Investment Law’, 30 Leiden Journal of International Law 351Google Scholar

Craven, M (2003), ‘Unity, Diversity and the Fragmentation of International Law’, 14 Finnish Yearbook of International Law 3Google Scholar

Crawford, J (2002), International Law as an Open System: Selected Essays (Cameron May)Google Scholar

Crawford, J (2005), The International Law Commission’s articles on State Responsibility: Introduction, Text and Commentaries (3rd edn, Cambridge University Press)Google Scholar

Crawford, J (2006), ‘Multilateral Rights and Obligations in International Law’, Collected Courses of the Hague Academy of International Law, vol. 319 (Brill)Google Scholar

Crawford, J (2013), State Responsibility: The General Part (Cambridge University Press)Google Scholar

Crawford, J (2014), ‘Chance, Order, Change: The Course of International Law, General Course on Public International Law’ in Collected Courses of the Hague Academy of International Law, vol. 365 (Hague Academy of International Law)Google Scholar

Crawford, J and Brownlie, I (2012), Brownlie’s Principles of Public International Law (8th edn, Oxford University Press)Google Scholar

Crawford, J and Koskenniemi, M (eds.) (2012), The Cambridge Companion to International Law (Cambridge University Press)Google Scholar

Crema, L (2010), ‘Disappearance and New Sighting of Restrictive Interpretation(s)’, 21 European Journal of International Law 681Google Scholar

Creswell, JW and Plano Clark, VL (2011), Designing and Conducting Mixed Methods Research (2nd edn, Sage Publications)Google Scholar

Croquet, N (2010), ‘The European Court of Human Rights’ Norm-Creation and Norm-Limiting Processes: Resolving a Normative Tension’, 17 Columbia Journal of European Law 307Google Scholar

Cross, FB (2007), Decision Making in the U.S. Courts of Appeals (Stanford University Press)Google Scholar

Crow, K (2017), ‘A Taxonomy of Proportionality in International Courts’ iCourts Working Paper Series, Paper No. 107Google Scholar

Cunliffe, J and Reeve, A (1999), ‘Dialogic Authority’, 19 Oxford Journal of Legal Studies 453Google Scholar

Cutler, AC (2001), ‘Critical Reflections on the Westphalian Assumptions of International Law and Organization: A Crisis of Legitimacy’, 27 Review of International Studies 133Google Scholar

Czapiewska, M (1990), ‘General Principles of International Responsibility of the State for Nationalization of Foreign Investments as One of the Means of Their Protection’, 2 Sri Lanka Journal of International Law 59Google Scholar

Ҫali, B (2016), ‘From Flexible to Variable Standards of Judicial Review: The Responsible Domestic Courts Doctrine at the European Court of Human Rights’ in Arnardóttir, and Buyse, (eds.), Shifting Centres of Gravity in Human Rights Protection: Rethinking Relations between the ECHR, EU, and National Legal Orders (Routledge)Google Scholar

Ҫali, B (2018), ‘Explaining Variation in the Intrusiveness of Regional Human Rights Remedies in Domestic Orders’, 16 International Journal of Constitutional Law 214Google Scholar

Çoban, AR (2004), Protection of Property Rights within the European Convention on Human Rights (Ashgate)Google Scholar

d’Aspremont, J (2012), ‘The Permanent Court of International Justice and Domestic Courts: A Variation in Roles’ in Tams and Fitzmaurice (eds.), Legacies of the Permanent Court of International Justice (Martinus Nijhoff)Google Scholar

d’Aspremont, J (2020), ‘The Control over Knowledge by International Courts and Arbitral Tribunals’ in Schultz, and Ortino, (eds.), Oxford Handbook of International Arbitration (Oxford University Press)Google Scholar

d’Aspremont, J and de Brabandere, E (2011), ‘The Complementary Faces of Legitimacy in International Law: The Legitimacy of Origin and the Legitimacy of Exercise’, 34 Fordham International Law Journal 190Google Scholar

d’Aspremont, J and Mbengue, MM (2014), ‘Strategies of Engagement with Scientific Fact-Finding in International Adjudication’, 5 Journal of International Dispute Settlement 240Google Scholar

D’Alterio, E (2011), ‘From Judicial Comity to Legal Comity: A Judicial Solution to Global Disorder?’, 9 International Journal of Constitutional Law 394Google Scholar

D’Amato, A (1983), ‘Legal Uncertainty’, 71 California Law Review 1Google Scholar

D’Ascoli, S and Scherr, KM (2007), ‘The Rule of Prior Exhaustion of Local Remedies in the International Law Doctrine and Its Application in the Specific Context of Human Rights Protection’ 16(1) Italian Yearbook of International Law 117Google Scholar

Daly P (2011), ‘Deference on Questions of Law’, 74 Modern Law Review 694Google Scholar

Daly, P (2012), A Theory of Deference in Administrative Law: Basis, Application and Scope (Cambridge University Press)Google Scholar

Dan-Cohen, M (1994), ‘In Defense of Defiance’, 23 Philosophy and Public Affairs 24Google Scholar

Daniel, J (2017), ‘Scrutinizing Deference to Administrative Agencies’, The Regulatory ReviewGoogle Scholar

Danilowicz, W (1983), ‘The Relation between International Law and Domestic Law in the Jurisprudence of the International Court of Justice’, 12 Polish Yearbook of International Law 153Google Scholar

Davis, H (1996), ‘Democratic Disablement and the Right to Property in the European Convention for the Protection of Human Rights’, 1 Journal of Civil Liberties 125Google Scholar

de Brabandere, E (2012), ‘Arbitral Decisions as a Source of International Investment Law’ in Gazzini, and de Brabandere, (eds.), International Investment Law: The Sources of Rights and Obligations (Martinus Nijhoff)Google Scholar

de Brabandere, E (2015), Investment Treaty Arbitration as Public International Law: Procedural Aspects and Implications (1st edn, Cambridge University Press)Google Scholar

de Bustamente y Sirven, AS (1924), ‘The Permanent Court of International Justice’, 9 Minnesota Law Review 122Google Scholar

De Dycker, S (2010), ‘Private International Law Disputes before the International Court of Justice’, 1 Journal of International Dispute Settlement 475Google Scholar

de Londras, F and Dzehtsiarou, K (2015), ‘Managing Judicial Innovation in the European Court of Human Rights’, 15 Human Rights Law Review 523Google Scholar

de Schutter, O and Tulkens, F (2008), ‘Rights in Conflict: The European Court of Human Rights as a Pragmatic Institution’ in Brems, (ed.), Conflicts between Fundamental Rights (Intersentia)Google Scholar

de Vattel, E (1797), The Law of Nations: Or, Principles of the Law of Nature Applied to the Conduct and Affairs of Nations and Sovereigns (GG & J Robinson)Google Scholar

De Ville, JR (2004), ‘Deference as Respect and Deference as Sacrifice’, 20 South African Journal on Human Rights 577Google Scholar

De Ville, JR (2006), ‘Deference and Différance: Judicial Review and the Perfect Gift’, 9 Potchefstroom Electronic Law Journal 1Google Scholar

de Visscher, C (1956), ‘Reflections on the Present Prospects of International Adjudication’, 50 American Journal of International Law 467Google Scholar

de Visscher, C (1968), Theory and Reality in Public International Law (PE Corbett tr., Princeton University Press)Google Scholar

de Wet, E (2007), ‘The Emerging International Constitutional Order: The Implications of Hierarchy in International Law for the Coherence and Legitimacy of International Decision-Making’, 10 Potchefstroom Electronic Law Journal 7Google Scholar

Delmas-Marty, M (2009), Ordering Pluralism: A Conceptual Framework for Understanding the Transnational Legal World (Hart)Google Scholar

Demirkol, B (2018), Judicial Acts and Investment Treaty Arbitration (Cambridge University Press)Google Scholar

Deneen, C (1930), ‘The Permanent Court of International Justice’, 35 Commercial Law League Journal 178Google Scholar

Desierto, DA (2012), Necessity and National Emergency Clauses: Sovereignty in Modern Treaty Interpretation (Martinus Nijhoff)Google Scholar

Dick, JC (1978), ‘The Bounds of Authority’, 4 Social Theory and Practice 375Google Scholar

Dixon, MJ (1996), ‘Fairness in International Laws and Institutions by Thomas M. Franck’, 55 Cambridge Law Journal 617Google Scholar

Dodge, W (2006), ‘Investor-State Dispute Settlement between Developed Countries: Reflections on the Australia-United States Free Trade Agreement’, 39 Vanderbilt Journal of Transnational Law 1Google Scholar

Dolzer, R (2002), ‘Indirect Expropriations: New Developments?’, 11 New York University Environmental Law Journal 64Google Scholar

Donoghue, J (2012), ‘The Role of the World Court Today’, 47 Georgia Law Review 181Google Scholar

Donoho, DL (2001), ‘Autonomy, Self-Governance, and the Margin of Appreciation: Developing a Jurisprudence of Diversity within Universal Human Rights’, 15 Emory International Law Review 391Google Scholar

Dothan, S (2018), ‘Margin of Appreciation and Democracy: Human Rights and Deference to Political Bodies’, 9(2) Journal of International Dispute Settlement 145Google Scholar

Douglas, Z (2003), ‘The Hybrid Foundations of Investment Treaty Arbitration’, 74 British Yearbook of International Law 151Google Scholar

Douglas, Z (2009), The International Law of Investment Claims (Cambridge University Press)Google Scholar

Douglas, Z (2014a), ‘Property, Investment and the Scope of Investment Protection Obligations’ in Douglas, et al. (eds.), The Foundations of International Investment Law: Bringing Theory into Practice (Oxford University Press)Google Scholar

Douglas, Z (2014b), ‘International Responsibility for Domestic Adjudication: Denial of Justice Deconstructed’, 63 International & Comparative Law Quarterly 867Google Scholar

Douglas, Z, Pauwelyn, J and Viñuales, JE (eds.) (2014), The Foundations of International Investment Law: Bringing Theory into Practice (Oxford University Press)Google Scholar

Drezner, D (2001), ‘On the Balance between International Law and Democratic Sovereignty’, 2 Chicago Journal of International Law 321Google Scholar

Dugard, J (2004), ‘Fifth Report on Diplomatic Protection’ UN Doc. A/CN.4/538Google Scholar

Dugard, J (2005), ‘Diplomatic Protection and Human Rights: The Draft Articles of the International Law Commission’, 24 Australian Year Book of International Law 75Google Scholar

Duguit, L (1917), ‘The Law and the State’, 31 Harvard Law Review 119Google Scholar

Duhaime, B (2014), ‘Subsidiarity in the Americas: What Room Is There for Deference in the Inter-American System?’ in Gruszczynski, and Werner, (eds.), Deference in International Courts and Tribunals: Standard of Review and Margin of Appreciation (Oxford University Press)Google Scholar

Dumberry, P and Stone, J (2014), ‘International Law, Whether You Like It or Not: An Analysis of Arbitral Tribunal Practice Regarding the Applicable Law in Deciding State Contracts Disputes under the ICSID Convention in the Twenty-First Century’, 5 Yearbook of International Investment Law and Policy 477Google Scholar

Duncan, K (2004), ‘Revisiting the Rights of Man: Georg Jellinek on Rights and the State’, 22 Law and History Review 493Google Scholar

Dunoff, JL and Pollack, MA (2012), ‘International Law and International Relations: Introducing an Interdisciplinary Dialogue’ in Dunoff, and Pollack, (eds.), Interdisciplinary Perspectives on International Law and International Relations: The State of the Art (Cambridge University Press)Google Scholar

Dunoff, JL (2006), ‘Constitutional Conceits: The WTO’s “Constitution” and the Discipline of International Law’, 17 European Journal of International Law 647Google Scholar

Dunoff, JL and Trachtman, J (1999), ‘Economic Analysis of International Law’, 24 Yale Law Journal Online 1Google Scholar

Dupuy, P-M (1997), ‘The Constitutional Dimension of the Charter of the United Nations Revisited’, 1 Max Planck Yearbook of International Law 1Google Scholar

Dupuy, P-M (1999), ‘The Danger of Fragmentation or Unification of the International Legal System and the International Court of Justice’, 31 New York University Journal of International Law and Politics 791Google Scholar

Dupuy, P-M (2007), ‘A Doctrinal Debate in the Globalisation Era: On the “Fragmentation” of International Law’, 1 European Journal of Legal Studies 25Google Scholar

Dupuy, P-M (2009), ‘Unification Rather than Fragmentation of International Law? The Case of International Investment Law and Human Rights Law’ in Dupuy, et al. (eds.), Human Rights in International Investment Law and Arbitration (Oxford University Press)Google Scholar

Dupuy, P-M and Viñuales, JE (2012), ‘Human Rights and Investment Disciplines: Integration in Progress’ in Bungenberg, et al. (eds.), International Investment Law (Nomos)Google Scholar

Dupuy, P-M and Viñuales, JE (2013), ‘The Challenge of “Proliferation”: An Anatomy of the Debate’ in Romano, et al. (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of International Adjudication (Oxford University Press)Google Scholar

Dworkin, R (1977), Taking Rights Seriously (Duckworth)Google Scholar

Dworkin, R (1986), Law’s Empire: Legal Theory (Harvard University Press)Google Scholar

Dworkin, R (1996), Freedom’s Law: The Moral Reading of the American Constitution (Harvard University Press)Google Scholar

Dye, VD (2013), ‘“Deference as Respect” in WTO Standard of Review’, 12 Journal of International Trade Law and Policy Information 23Google Scholar

Dyson, LJ (2006), ‘Some Thoughts on Judicial Deference’, 11 Judicial Review 103Google Scholar

Dyzenhaus, D (1997), ‘The Politics of Deference: Judicial Review and Democracy’ in Taggart, (ed.), The Province of Administrative Law (Hart)Google Scholar

Dyzenhaus, D (1998), ‘Law as Justification: Etienne Mureinik’s Conception of Legal Culture’, 14 South African Journal on Human Rights 11Google Scholar

Dyzenhaus, D (2003), ‘Humpty Dumpty Rules or the Rule of Law: Legal Theory and the Adjudication of National Security’, 28 Australian Journal of Legal Philosophy 1Google Scholar

Dyzenhaus, D (2011), ‘Positivism and the Pesky Sovereign’ 22 European Journal of International Law 363Google Scholar

Dzehtsiarou, K and Greene, A (2011), ‘Legitimacy and the Future of the European Court of Human Rights: Critical Perspectives from Academia and Practitioners’, 12 German Law Journal 1707Google Scholar

Ederington, LB (1997), ‘Property as a Natural Institution: The Separation of Property from Sovereignty in International Law’, 13 American University of International Law Review 263Google Scholar

Edwards, R (2002), ‘Judicial Deference under the Human Rights Act’, 65 Modern Law Review 859Google Scholar

Egger, P and Pfaffermayr, M (2004), ‘The Impact of Bilateral Investment Treaties on Foreign Direct Investment’, 32 Journal of Comparative Economics 788Google Scholar

Ehlermann, C-D and Lockhart, N (2004), ‘Standard of Review in WTO Law’, 7 Journal of International Economic Law 491Google Scholar

El Boudouhi, S (2015), ‘A Comparative Approach of the National Margin of Appreciation Doctrine before the ECtHR, Investment Tribunals and WTO Dispute Settlement Bodies’ RSCAS Global Governance Programme Paper No. 2015/27Google Scholar

El Hayek, I and Gilles, A (2014), ‘Multifaceted Settlement of International Investments Disputes: Thoughts about the Variety of Instruments Claiming Their Applicability to the Investment Dispute’, 29 ICSID Review – Foreign Investment Law Journal 567Google Scholar

Eleftheriadis, P (2010), ‘The Law of Laws’, 1(4) Transnational Legal Theory 597Google Scholar

Elias, T (1983), The International Court of Justice and Some Contemporary Problems: Essays on International Law (Martinus Nijhoff)Google Scholar

Elliott, M (2010), ‘Proportionality and Deference: The Importance of a Structured Approach’ in Forsyth, et al. (eds.), Effective Judicial Review: A Cornerstone of Good Governance (Oxford University Press)Google Scholar

Elliott, M (2015a), ‘Justification, Calibration and Substantive Judicial Review: Putting Doctrine in Its Place’ in Wilberg, and Elliott (eds.), , The Scope and Intensity of Substantive Review: Traversing Taggart’s Rainbow (Hart)Google Scholar

Elliott, M (2015b), ‘From Bifurcation to Calibration: Twin-Track Deference and the Culture of Justification’ in Wilberg, and Elliott, (eds.), The Scope and Intensity of Substantive Review: Traversing Taggart’s Rainbow (Hart)Google Scholar

Ellis, J (2011), ‘General Principles and Comparative Law’, 22 European Journal of International Law 949Google Scholar

Ely, JH (1980), Democracy and Distrust: A Theory of Judicial Review (Harvard University Press)Google Scholar

Emberland, M (2004), ‘The Corporate Veil in the Jurisprudence of the Human Rights Committee and the Inter-American Court and Commission of Human Rights’, 4 Human Rights Law Review 257Google Scholar

Emberland, M (2006), The Human Rights of Companies: Exploring the Structure of ECHR Protection (Oxford University Press)Google Scholar

Emberland, M (2007), ‘The International Court of Justice and Companies: Is It Possible to Discern a “Structural Bias” at the Court Regarding Private Economic Enterprise?’, 9 International Community Law Review 187Google Scholar

Endicott, T (2001), ‘International Meaning: Comity in Fundamental Rights Adjudication’, 13 International Journal of Refugee Law 280Google Scholar

Endicott, T (2015), ‘Comity among Authorities’, 68 Current Legal Problems 1Google Scholar

Engle, E (2012), ‘The History of the General Principle of Proportionality: An Overview’, 10 Dartmouth Law Journal 1Google Scholar

Enoch, D (2014), ‘A Defense of Moral Deference’, 111 Journal of Philosophy 229Google Scholar

Esty, D (2006), ‘Good Governance at the Supranational Scale: Globalizing Administrative Law’, 115 Yale Law Journal 1490Google Scholar

Evenson, E (2001), ‘Reforms Ahead: Enlargement of the Council of Europe and the Future of the Strasbourg System’, 1 Human Rights Law Review 219Google Scholar

Ewing-Chow, M (2001), ‘Investor Protection in Free Trade Agreements: Lessons from North America’, 5 Singapore Journal of International and Comparative Law 748Google Scholar

Eyffinger, A (2007a), The 1907 Hague Peace Conference (JudiCap)Google Scholar

Eyffinger, A (2007b), ‘A Highly Critical Moment: Role and Record of the 1907 Hague Peace Conference’, 54 Netherlands International Law Review 197Google Scholar

Fachiri, AP (1932), The Permanent Court of International Justice: Its Constitution, Procedure and Work (2nd edn, Oxford University Press)Google Scholar

Fahner, JH (2013), ‘Margin of Appreciation in Investor-State Arbitration: The Prevalence and Desirability of Discretion and Deference’, 26 Hague Year Book of International Law 422Google Scholar

Fahner, JH (2016), ‘From Dispute Settlement to Judicial Review? The Deference Debate in International Investment Law’ in Duchateau, et al. (eds.), Evolution in Dispute Resolution: From Adjudication to ADR? (Eleven International Publishing)Google Scholar

Falk, RA (1964), The Role of Domestic Courts in the International Legal Order (Syracuse University Press)Google Scholar

Falk, RA (1967), ‘New Approaches to the Study of International Law’, 61 American Journal of International Law 477Google Scholar

Fassbender, B (2003), ‘Sovereignty and Constitutionalism in International Law’ in Walker, (ed.), Sovereignty in Transition (Hart)Google Scholar

Fauchald, OK (2008), ‘The Legal Reasoning of ICSID Tribunals – An Empirical Analysis’, 19 European Journal of International Law 301Google Scholar

Fawcett, JES (1954), ‘The Exhaustion of Local Remedies: Substance or Procedure?’, 31 British Yearbook of International Law 452Google Scholar

Feldman, M (2017), ‘Investment Arbitration Appellate Mechanism Options: Consistency, Accuracy, and Balance of Power’, 32 ICSID Review – Foreign Investment Law Journal 528Google Scholar

Feller, AH (1935), The Mexican Claims Commissions: 1923–1934, A Study in the Law and Procedure of International Tribunals (Macmillan)Google Scholar

Fereday, J and Muir-Cochrane, E (2006), ‘Demonstrating Rigor Using Thematic Analysis: A Hybrid Approach of Inductive and Deductive Coding and Theme Development’, 5 International Journal of Qualitative Methods 80Google Scholar

Ferrari-Bravo, L (1983), ‘International and Municipal Law: The Complementarity of Legal Systems’ in Macdonald, and Johnston, (eds.), The Structure and Process of International Law: Essays in Legal Philosophy, Doctrine and Theory (Martinus Nijhoff)Google Scholar

Ferrero, G (1942), The Principles of Power: The Great Political Crises of History (Putnam’s)Google Scholar

Finnis, J (2011), Natural Law and Natural Rights (2nd edn, Oxford University Press)Google Scholar

Fischer-Lescano, A and Teubner, G (2004), ‘Regime-Collisions: The Vain Search for Legal Unity in the Fragmentation of Global Law’, 25 Michigan Journal of International Law 999Google Scholar

Fish, S (1989), Doing What Comes Naturally: Change, Rhetoric, and the Practice of Theory in Literary and Legal Studies (Clarendon)Google Scholar

Fish, S (2000), Is There a Text in This Class? The Authority of Interpretive Communities (11th edn, Harvard University Press)Google Scholar

Flanders, CW (2009), ‘Toward a Theory of Persuasive Authority’, 62 Oklahoma Law Review 55Google Scholar

Føllesdal, A (2009), ‘Why the European Court of Human Rights Might Be Democratically Legitimate – A Modest Defense’ 27 Nordisk Tidsskrift for Menneskerettigheter 289Google Scholar

Føllesdal, A (2013a) ‘Much Ado About Nothing? International Judicial Review of Human Rights in Well-Functioning Democracies’ in Føllesdal, et al., The Legitimacy of International Human Rights Regimes (Cambridge University Press)Google Scholar

Føllesdal, A (2013b), ‘The Principle of Subsidiarity as a Constitutional Principle in International Law’, 2 Global Constitutionalism 37Google Scholar

Føllesdal, A (2016), ‘Subsidiarity and International Human Rights Courts: Respecting Self-Governance and Protecting Human Rights – Or Neither?’, 79 Law and Contemporary Problems 147Google Scholar

Foster, C (2010), ‘Burden of Proof in International Courts and Tribunals’, 29 Australian Year Book of International Law 27Google Scholar

Foster, GK (2011), ‘Striking a Balance between Investor Protections and National Sovereignty: The Relevance of Local Remedies in Investment Treaty Arbitration’, 49 Columbia Journal of Transnational Law 201Google Scholar

Foucault, M (2007), The Politics of Truth (MIT Press)Google Scholar

Fragale, AR et al. (2012), ‘Appeasing Equals: Lateral Deference in Organizational Communication’, 57 Administrative Science Quarterly 373Google Scholar

Francioni, F (1999), ‘Customary International Law and the European Convention on Human Rights’, 9 Italian Yearbook of International Law 11Google Scholar

Franck, S (2006), ‘The Role of International Arbitrators’, 12 ILSA Journal of International & Comparative Law 499Google Scholar

Franck, S (2009), ‘Development and Outcomes of Investment Treaty Arbitration’, 50 Harvard International Law Journal 435Google Scholar

Franck, TM (1988), ‘Legitimacy in the International System’, 82 American Journal of International Law 705Google Scholar

Franck, TM (1990), The Power of Legitimacy among Nations (Oxford University Press)Google Scholar

Franck, TM (1998), Fairness in International Law and Institutions (Oxford University Press)Google Scholar

Franck, TM (2006b), ‘The Power of Legitimacy and the Legitimacy of Power: International Law in an Age of Power Disequilibrium’, 100 American Journal of International Law 88CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Franck, TM (2008), ‘On Proportionality of Countermeasures in International Law’, 102 American Journal of International Law 715Google Scholar

Fredman, S (2006), ‘From Deference to Democracy: The Role of Equality under the Human Rights Act 1998’, 122 Law Quarterly Review 53Google Scholar

Freeman, E (2003), ‘Regulatory Expropriation under NAFTA Chapter 11: Some Lessons from the European Court of Human Rights’, 42 Columbia Journal of Transnational Law 117Google Scholar

Friedheim, RL and Kadane, JB (1970), ‘Quantitative Content Analysis of the United Nations Seabed Debate: Methodology and a Continental Shelf Case Study’, 24 International Organization 479Google Scholar

Friedman, S (1953), Expropriation in International Law (Stevens & Sons Limited)Google Scholar

Friedmann, W (1964), The Changing Structure of International Law (Stevens & Sons Limited)Google Scholar

Frigo, M (2000), ‘Peaceful Enjoyment of Possessions, Expropriation and Control of the Use of Property in the System of the European Convention on Human Rights’, 10 Italian Year Book of International Law 45Google Scholar

Frowein, JA (1993), ‘The Protection of Property’ in Macdonald, et al. (eds.), The European System for the Protection of Human Rights (Martinus Nijhoff)Google Scholar

Fry, JD (2007), ‘International Human Rights Law in Investment Arbitration: Evidence of International Law’s Unity’, 18 Duke Journal of Comparative and International Law 77Google Scholar

Fukunaga, Y (2012), ‘Standard of Review and “Scientific Truths” in the WTO Dispute Settlement System and Investment Arbitration’, 3 Journal of International Dispute Settlement 559Google Scholar

Gaillard, E (2010), Legal Theory of International Arbitration (Martinus Nijhoff)Google Scholar

Gaja, G (1992), ‘Positivism and Dualism in Dionisio Anzilotti’, 3 European Journal of International Law 123Google Scholar

Gallie, WB (1956), ‘Essentially Contested Concepts’, Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society (Harrison & Sons)Google Scholar

Galligan, DJ (2010), ‘Legal Theory and Empirical Research’ in Cane, and Kritzer, (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Empirical Legal Research (Oxford University Press)Google Scholar

Gardbaum, S (2009), ‘Human Rights and International Constitutionalism’ in Dunoff, and Trachtman, (eds.), Ruling the World? Constitutionalism, International Law and Global Government (Cambridge University Press)Google Scholar

Garner, JW (1929), ‘The New Arbitration Treaties of the United States’, 23 American Journal of International Law 595Google Scholar

Garrity-Rokous, G and Brescia, RH (1993), ‘Procedural Justice and International Human Rights: Towards a Procedural Jurisprudence for Human Rights Tribunals’, 18 Yale Journal of International Law 559Google Scholar

Gathii, JT (2009), ‘War’s Legacy in International Investment Law’, 11 International Community Law Review 353Google Scholar

Gelinas, F (2005), ‘Investment Tribunals and the Commercial Arbitration Model: Mixed Procedures and Creeping Institutionalisation’ in Gehring, and Cordonier, Segger, (eds.), Sustainable Development in World Trade Law (Kluwer Law International)Google Scholar

Gerards, J (2004), ‘Intensity of Judicial Review in Equal Treatment Cases, 51 Netherlands International Law Review 135Google Scholar

Gerards, J (2009), ‘Judicial Deliberations in the European Court of Human Rights’ in Huls, et al. (eds.), The Legitimacy of Highest Courts’ Rulings (TMC Asser Institute)Google Scholar

Gerards, J (2011), ‘Pluralism, Deference and the Margin of Appreciation Doctrine’, 17 European Law Journal 80Google Scholar

Gerards, J (2014), ‘Diverging Fundamental Rights Standards and the Role of the European Court of Human Rights’ in Claes, and de Visser, (eds.), Constructing European Constitutional Law (Hart)Google Scholar

Gerards, J (2017), ‘Procedural Review by the ECtHR: A Typology’ in Brems, and Gerards, (eds.), Procedural Review in European Fundamental Rights Cases (Cambridge University Press)Google Scholar

Gerards, J (2018a), ‘The Draft Copenhagen Declaration and the Court’s Dual Role – the Need for a Different Definition of Subsidiarity and the Margin of Appreciation’ Strasbourg ObserversGoogle Scholar

Gerards, J (2018b), ‘Margin of Appreciation and Incrementalism in the Case Law of the European Court of Human Rights’ 18 Human Rights Law Review 495Google Scholar

Gerards, J and Senden, H (2009), ‘The Structure of Fundamental Rights and the European Court of Human Rights’, 7 International Journal of Constitutional Law 619Google Scholar

Gerbic, P and Stacey, E (2005), ‘A Purposive Approach to Content Analysis: Designing Analytical Frameworks’, 8 Internet and Higher Education 45Google Scholar

Ghosh, VN (2015), ‘An Uncertain Shield – Res Judicata in Arbitration’, 31 Arbitration International 661Google Scholar

Ghouri, A (2014), ‘On Genealogy of Proposals to Reform Investor-State Arbitration’, 11 Transnational Dispute Management 1Google Scholar

Gibson, C (2015), ‘Beyond Self-Judgment: Exceptions Clauses in US BITs’, 1 Fordham International Law Journal 38Google Scholar

Gibson, JL, Caldeira, GA and Baird, V (1998), ‘On the Legitimacy of National High Courts’, 92 American Political Science Review 343Google Scholar

Gilmore, G (1945), ‘The International Court of Justice’, 55 Yale Law Journal 1049Google Scholar

Ginsburg, T (2004), ‘Bounded Discretion in International Judicial Lawmaking’, 45 Virginia Journal of International Law 631Google Scholar

Ginsburg, T (2005), ‘International Substitutes for Domestic Institutions: Bilateral Investment Treaties and Governance’, 25 International Review of Law and Economics 107Google Scholar

Ginsburg, T (2016), ‘The Interaction between Domestic and International Law’ in Kontorovich, and Parisi, (eds.), Economic Analysis of International Law (Edward Elgar)Google Scholar

Giorgetti, C (2013), ‘Is the Truth in the Eyes of the Beholder? The Perils and Benefits of Empirical Research in International Investment Arbitration’, 12 Santa Clara Journal of International Law 263Google Scholar

Giustini, A (1986), ‘Compulsory Adjudication in International Law: The Past, the Present, and Prospects for the Future’, 9 Fordham International Law Journal 213Google Scholar

Glashausser, A (2005), ‘Difference and Deference in Treaty Interpretation’, 50 Villanova Law Review 25Google Scholar

Glenn, HP (1987), ‘Persuasive Authority’, 32 Revue de droit de McGill 261Google Scholar

Goldhaber, M (2016), ‘A Matter of Perspective: Global Governance and the Distinction between Public and Private Authority (and Not Law)’, 5 Global Constitutionalism 48Google Scholar

Goldsmith III, JL and Levinson, D (2009), ‘Law for States: International Law, Constitutional Law, Public Law’ 122(7) Harvard Law Review 1791Google Scholar

Gordillo, LI (2011), Interlocking Constitutions: Towards an Interordinal Theory of National, European and UN Law (Hart)Google Scholar

Graham, DE (1970), ‘The Calvo Clause: Its Current Status as a Contractual Renunciation of Diplomatic Protection’, 6 Texas International Law Forum 289Google Scholar

Grant, JA (2017), ‘Reason and Authority in Administrative Law’, 76 Cambridge Law Journal 507Google Scholar

Grant, K (2015), ‘ICSID’s Reinforcement?: UNASUR and the Rise of a Hybrid Regime for International Investment Arbitration’, 52 Osgoode Hall Law Journal 1115 Google Scholar

Green, A (2010), ‘An Absolute Theory of Convention Rights: Why the ECHR Gives Rise to Legal Rights That Cannot Conflict with Each Other’, 16 UCL Jurisprudence Review 75Google Scholar

Green, L (1988), The Authority of the State (Clarendon)Google Scholar

Greene, RD (1927), ‘The Permanent Court of International Justice’, 7 B.U.L. Review 181Google Scholar

Greene, RD (1931), ‘The Progress of the Permanent Court of International Justice’, 6 St. John’s Law Review 226Google Scholar

Greener, J (2002), ‘Constructive Expropriation and the Framework of Deferential Progressivism’, 25 Loyola of Los Angeles International and Comparative Law Review 725Google Scholar

Greer, S (2000), The Margin of Appreciation: Interpretation and Discretion under the European Convention on Human Rights (Council of Europe Publishing)Google Scholar

Greer, S (2004), ‘“Balancing” and the European Court of Human Rights: A Contribution to the Habermas-Alexy Debate’, 63 Cambridge Law Journal 412Google Scholar

Greer, S (2010), ‘The Interpretation of the European Convention on Human Rights: Universal Principle or Margin of Appreciation?’, 3 UCL Human Rights Review 1Google Scholar

Greer, S and Wildhaber, L (2012), ‘Revisiting the Debate about “Constitutionalising” the European Court of Human Rights’, 12 Human Rights Law Review 655Google Scholar

Grieves, FL (1969), Supranationalism and International Adjudication (University of Illinois Press)Google Scholar

Griffey, B (2011), ‘The “Reasonableness” Test: Assessing Violations of State Obligations under the Optional Protocol to the International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights’, 11 Human Rights Law Review 275Google Scholar

Grisel, F (2014a), ‘Precedent in Investment Arbitration: The Case of Compound Interest’, 2 Peking University Transnational Law Review 217Google Scholar

Grisel, F (2014b), ‘The Sources of Foreign Investment Law’ in Douglas, et al. (eds.), The Foundations of International Investment Law (Oxford University Press)Google Scholar

Grisel, F (2017), ‘Competition and Cooperation in International Commercial Arbitration: The Birth of a Transnational Legal Profession’, 51 Law & Society Review 790Google Scholar

Grisel, F (2020), ‘Marginals and Elites in International Arbitration’ in Schultz, and Ortino, (eds.), Oxford Handbook of International Arbitration (Oxford University Press)Google Scholar

Gross, O and Ni Aolain, F (2001), ‘From Discretion to Scrutiny: Revisiting the Application of the Margin of Appreciation Doctrine in the Context of Article 15 of the European Convention on Human Rights’, 23 Human Rights Quarterly 652Google Scholar

Grossman, N (2009), ‘Legitimacy and International Adjudicative Bodies’. 41 George Washington International Law Review 107Google Scholar

Gruszczynski, L and Vadi, V (2014) ‘Standard of Review and Scientific Evidence in WTO Law and International Investment Arbitration – Converging Parallels?’ in Gruszczynski, and Werner, (eds.), Deference in International Courts and Tribunals: Standard of Review and Margin of Appreciation (Oxford University Press)Google Scholar

Gruszczynski, L and Werner, W (eds.) (2014), Deference in International Courts and Tribunals: Standard of Review and Margin of Appreciation (Oxford University Press)Google Scholar

Guillaume, G (1995), ‘The Future of International Judicial Institutions’, 44 International & Comparative Law Quarterly 848Google Scholar

Guillaume, G (2011), ‘The Use of Precedent by International Judges and Arbitrators’, 2 Journal of International Dispute Settlement 5Google Scholar

Guthrie, G (2010), Basic Research Methods an Entry to Social Science Research (Sage Publications)Google Scholar

Guzman, AT (2008), ‘International Tribunals: A Rational Choice Analysis’, 157 University of Pennsylvania Law Review 171Google Scholar

Guzman, AT and Meyer, T (2008), ‘International Common Law: The Soft Law of International Tribunals’, 9 Chicago Journal of International Law 515Google Scholar

Habermas, J (2015), Between Facts and Norms: Contributions to a Discourse Theory of Law and Democracy (Polity Press)Google Scholar

Haesler, T (1968), The Exhaustion of Local Remedies in the Case Law of International Courts and Tribunals (AW Sijthoff)Google Scholar

Hall, M and Wright, R (2008), ‘Systematic Content Analysis of Judicial Opinions’, 96 California Law Review 63Google Scholar

Han, SWD (2006), ‘Decentralized Proliferation of International Judicial Bodies’, 16 Journal of Transnational Law and Policy 101Google Scholar

Harbo, T-I (2017), ‘Introducing Procedural Proportionality Review in European Law’, 30 Leiden Journal of International Law 25Google Scholar

Harding, J (1962), ‘The Nationalization of Canadian Property in Cuba under International Law’, 2 Western Law Review 50Google Scholar

Harowitz, P (2008), ‘Three Faces of Deference’, 83 Notre Dame Law Review 1061Google Scholar

Harris, B (2003), ‘Judicial Review, Justiciability and the Prerogative of Mercy’, 62 Cambridge Law Journal 631Google Scholar

Hart, HLA (1994), The Concept of Law (2nd edn, Clarendon)Google Scholar

Hart, Jr HM and Sacks, AM (1994), The Legal Process: Basic Problems in the Making and Application of Law (Foundation Press)Google Scholar

Hathaway, O (2008), ‘International Delegation and State Sovereignty’, 71 Law and Contemporary Problems 115Google Scholar

Hayward, B (2017), Conflict of Law and Arbitral Discretion: The Closest Connection Test (1st edn, Oxford University Press)Google Scholar

Heise, M, (2000) ‘Preliminary Thoughts on the Virtues of Passive Dialogue’, 34 Akron Law Review 73Google Scholar

Heiskanen, V (1994), ‘Jurisdiction v. Competence: Revisiting a Frequently Neglected Distinction’, 5 Finnish Yearbook of International Law 1Google Scholar

Helfer, L (2003), ‘Constitutional Analogies in the International Legal System’, 37 Loyola of Los Angeles International and Comparative Law Review 193Google Scholar

Helfer, L (2008), ‘Redesigning the European Court of Human Rights: Embeddedness as a Deep Structural Principle of the European Human Rights Regime’, 19 European Journal of International Law 125Google Scholar

Helfer, L and Alter, KJ (2009), ‘The Andean Tribunal of Justice and Its Interlocutors: Understanding Preliminary Reference Patterns in the Andean Community’, 41 New York University Journal of International Law and Politics 871Google Scholar

Helfer, L and Slaughter, A-M (1997), ‘Toward a Theory of Effective Supranational Adjudication’, 107 Yale Law Journal 273Google Scholar

Henckels, C (2012), ‘Indirect Expropriation and the Right to Regulate: Revisiting Proportionality Analysis and the Standard of Review in Investor-State Arbitration’, 15 Journal of International Economic Law 223Google Scholar

Henckels, C (2013), ‘Balancing Investment Protection and the Public Interest: The Role of the Standard of Review and the Importance of Deference in Investor-State Arbitration’, 4 Journal of International Dispute Settlement 197Google Scholar

Henckels, C (2014), ‘The Role of the Standard of Review and the Importance of Deference in Investor-State Arbitration’ in Gruszczynski, and Werner, (eds.), Deference in International Courts and Tribunals: Standard of Review and Margin of Appreciation (Oxford University Press)Google Scholar

Henckels, C (2015), Proportionality and Deference in Investor-State Arbitration: Balancing Investment Protection and Regulatory Autonomy (Cambridge University Press)Google Scholar

Henkin, L (1990), ‘International Law: Politics, Values and Functions’, in Collected Courses of the Hague Academy of International Law, vol. 4 (Brill)Google Scholar

Henrard, K (2012), ‘A Critical Appraisal of the Margin of Appreciation Left to States Pertaining to “Church-State Relations” under the Jurisprudence of the European Court of Human Rights’ in Vrielink, et al. (eds.), A Test of Faith? Religious Diversity and Accommodation in the European Workplace (Ashgate)Google Scholar

Hepburn, J (2014), ‘Comparative Public Law at the Dawn of Investment Treaty Arbitration: Saar Papier Vertriebs GmbH v. Republic of Poland’, 15 Journal of World Investment & Trade 705Google Scholar

Hepburn, J (2016), ‘Applicable Law in TPP Investment Disputes’, 17 Melbourne Journal of International Law 368Google Scholar

Hepburn, J (2017), Domestic Law in International Investment Arbitration (Oxford University Press)Google Scholar

Heringa, AW (1996), ‘The “Consensus Principle” – The Role of “Common Law” in the ECHR Case Law’, 3 Maastricht Journal of European and Comparative Law 108Google Scholar

Hernández, GI (2014), The International Court of Justice and the Judicial Function (Oxford University Press)Google Scholar

Hershovitz, S (2003), ‘Legitimacy, Democracy, and Razian Authority’ 9 Legal Theory 201Google Scholar

Herz, J (1941), ‘Expropriation of Foreign Property’, 35 American Journal of International Law 243Google Scholar

Hess, G (2013), ‘Qualitative Research on Legal Education: Studying Outstanding Law Teachers’, 51 Alberta Law Review 925Google Scholar

Hey, E and Mak, E (2009), ‘Introduction: The Possibilities of Comparative Law Methods for Research on the Rule of Law in a Global Context’, 2 Erasmus Law Review 287Google Scholar

Hickman, T (2005), ‘Constitutional Dialogue, Constitutional Theories and the Human Rights Act 1998’, Public Law 306Google Scholar

Higgins, R (1968), ‘Policy Considerations and the International Judicial Process’, 17 International & Comparative Law Quarterly 58Google Scholar

Higgins, R (1981), ‘Reality and Hope in International Human Rights: A Critique’, 9 Hofstra Law Review 1485Google Scholar

Higgins, R (1982), ‘The Taking of Property by the State: Recent Developments in International Law’, in Collected Courses of the Hague Academy of International Law, vol. 176 (Brill)Google Scholar

Higgins, R (2009), Themes and Theories (Oxford University Press)Google Scholar

Hill, N (1931), ‘National Judges in the Permanent Court of International Justice’, 25 American Journal of International Law 670Google Scholar

Hill, N (1932), ‘The Extension of the Jurisdiction of the Permanent Court of International Justice by Treaties’, 10 New York University Law Quarterly Review 484Google Scholar

Hilson, C (2013), ‘The Margin of Appreciation, Domestic Irregularity and Domestic Court Rulings in ECHR Environmental Jurisprudence: Global Legal Pluralism in Action’, 2 Global Constitutionalism 262Google Scholar

Hirsch, M (2005), ‘The Sociology of International Law: Invitation to Study International Rules in Their Social Context’, 55 University of Toronto Law Journal 891Google Scholar

Hobbes, T (1996), Leviathan (Tuck, R ed., Cambridge University Press)Google Scholar

Hoexter, C (2000), ‘The Future of Judicial Review in South African Administrative Law’, 117 South African Law Journal 484Google Scholar

Holmes, OW (1991), The Common Law (Dover Publications)Google Scholar

Holstein, J and Gubrium, J (2000), ‘The Constructionist Analytics of Interpretive Practice’ in Denzin, and Lincoln, (eds.), Handbook of Qualitative Research (2nd edn, Sage Publications)Google Scholar

Holtermann, J v. H and Madsen, MR (2016), ‘What Is Empirical in Empirical Studies of Law? A European New Legal Realist Conception’ iCourts Working Paper Series, Paper No. 77Google Scholar

Hovius, B (1985), ‘The Limitation Clauses of the European Convention on Human Rights: A Guide for the Application of Section 1 of the Charter?’, 17 Ottawa Law Review 213Google Scholar

Howell, J (2006), ‘Book Reviews: Property and the Human Rights Act 1998’, 65 Cambridge Law Journal 728Google Scholar

Hsieh, H-F (2005), ‘Three Approaches to Qualitative Content Analysis’, Qualitative Health Research 1277Google Scholar

Hudson, MO (1928), ‘The World Court: 1922–1928’ World Peace Foundation Pamphlet Series 1Google Scholar

Hudson, MO (1930), ‘The Eighth Year of the Permanent Court of International Justice’, 13 International Conciliation 193Google Scholar

Hudson, MO (1931), ‘The Independence of the Permanent Court of International Justice’, 17 American Bar Association Journal 430Google Scholar

Hudson, MO (1941), ‘The Nineteenth Year of the Permanent Court of International Justice’, 35 American Journal of International Law 1Google Scholar

Hudson, MO (1945), ‘The Twenty-Third Year of the Permanent Court of International Justice and Its Future’, 39 American Journal of International Law 1Google Scholar

Hudson, MO (1957), ‘The Succession of the International Court of Justice to the Permanent Court of International Justice’, 51 American Journal of International Law 569Google Scholar

Huijbers, L (2017), ‘Procedural-Type Review: A More Neutral Approach to Human Rights Protection by the European Court of Human Rights?’ European Society of International Law, Conference Paper No. 6/2017Google Scholar

Huiping, C (2008), ‘The Investor-State Dispute Settlement Mechanism: Where to Go in the 21st Century?’, 9 Journal of World Investment & Trade 467Google Scholar

Hull, WI (1970), The Two Hague Conferences and Their Contributions to International Law (Kraus)Google Scholar

Hurd, I (1999), ‘Legitimacy and Authority in International Politics’, 53 International Organization 379Google Scholar

Hurrelmann, A and others (2005), ‘Is There a Legitimation Crisis of the Nation-State?’, 13 European Review 119Google Scholar

Hurst, CJB (1943), ‘The Permanent Court of International Justice’, 59 Law Quarterly Review 312Google Scholar

Hussain, I (1984), Dissenting and Separate Opinions at the World Court (Martinus Nijhoff)Google Scholar

Hyde, CC (1930), ‘The Interpretation of Treaties by the Permanent Court of International Justice’, 24 American Journal of International Law 1Google Scholar

ICJ Registry (1976), The International Court of Justice (International Court of Justice)Google Scholar

Iluyomade, BO (1977), ‘Dual Claim and the Exhaustion of Local Remedies Rule in International Law’, 10 Vanderbilt Journal of Transnational Law 83Google Scholar

International Institute for Sustainable Development (2017), Exhaustion of Local Remedies in International Investment LawGoogle Scholar

International Law Association (2000), ‘Committee on Diplomatic Protection of Persons and Property’, 69 International Law Association Reports of Conferences 604Google Scholar

International Law Association (2006), ‘Diplomatic Protection of Persons and Property’, 72 International Law Association Reports of Conferences 353Google Scholar

Ishikawa, T (2010), ‘Third Party Participation in Investment Treaty Arbitration’, 59 International & Comparative Law Quarterly 373Google Scholar

Isiksel, T (2013), ‘Global Legal Pluralism as Fact and Norm’, 2 Global Constitutionalism 160Google Scholar

Jachtenfuchs, M and Krisch, N (2016), ‘Subsidiarity in Global Governance’, Law & Contemporary Problems 79Google Scholar

Jackson, JH (2003), ‘Sovereignty-Modern: A New Approach to an Outdated Concept’, 97 American Journal of International Law 782Google Scholar

Jackson, JL (2006), ‘Broniowski v. Poland: A Recipe for Increased Legitimacy of the European Court of Human Rights as a Supranational Constitutional Court’, 39 Connecticut Law Review 759Google Scholar

Jacob, M (2011), ‘Precedents: Lawmaking through International Adjudication’, 12 German Law Journal 1005Google Scholar

Jacoby, S (1936), ‘Some Aspects of the Jurisdiction of the Permanent Court of International Justice’, 30 American Journal of International Law 233Google Scholar

Janzen, H (1935), ‘The Legal Monism of Alfred Verdross’, 29 American Political Science Review 387Google Scholar

Jellinek, G (1968), Die Rechtliche Natur Der Staatenverträge: Ein Beitrag Zur Juristischen Construction Des Völkerrechts (Keip)Google Scholar

Jenks, CW (1938), ‘The Interpretation and Application of Municipal Law by the Permanent Court of International Justice’, 19 British Yearbook of International Law 67Google Scholar

Jenks, CW (1964), The Prospects of International Adjudication (Stevens & Sons Limited)Google Scholar

Jennings, RY (1996), ‘The Judiciary, International and National, and the Development of International Law’, 45 International & Comparative Law Quarterly 1Google Scholar

Jennings, RY (1998), ‘The Role of the International Court of Justice’, British Yearbook of International Law 1Google Scholar

Jennings, RY (2002), ‘Sovereignty and International Law’ in Kreijen, et al. (eds.), State, Sovereignty, and International Governance (Oxford University Press)Google Scholar

Jessup, PC (1956), Transnational Law (Yale University Press)Google Scholar

Jhabvala, F (1978), ‘Declarations by Judges of the International Court of Justice’, 72 American Journal of International Law 830Google Scholar

Jimenez de Arechaga, E (1965), ‘Diplomatic Protection of Shareholders in International Law’, 4 Philippine International Law Journal 71Google Scholar

Jimenez de Arechaga, E (1978), ‘International Law in the Past Third of a Century’, in Collected Courses of the Hague Academy of International Law, vol. 159 (Brill)Google Scholar

Johns, F (2009), ‘International Legal Theory: Snapshots from a Decade of International Legal Life’, 10 Melbourne Journal of International Law 1Google Scholar

Johnson, OT and Gimblett, J (2011), ‘From Gunboats to BITs: The Evolution of Modern International Investment Law’, Yearbook on International Investment Law and Policy 649Google Scholar

Johnstone, I (1990), ‘Treaty Interpretation: The Authority of Interpretive Communities’, 12 Michigan Journal of International Law 371Google Scholar

Jones, JW (1935), ‘The “Pure” Theory of International Law’, 16 British Yearbook of International Law 5Google Scholar

Jowell, J (2003), ‘Judicial Deference and Human Rights: A Question of Competence’ in Craig, et al. (eds.), Law and Administration in Europe: Essays in Honour of Carol Harlow (Oxford University Press)Google Scholar

Juss, SS (1994), ‘Nationality Law, Sovereignty, and the Doctrine of Exclusive Domestic Jurisdiction’, 9 Florida Journal of International Law 227Google Scholar

Kammerhofer, J (2005), ‘Unearthing Structural Uncertainty through Neo-Kelsenian Consistency: Conflicts of Norms in International Law’ Papers of the European Society of International LawGoogle Scholar

Kammerhofer, J (2009), ‘Kelsen – Which Kelsen? A Reapplication of the Pure Theory to International Law’, 22 Leiden Journal of International Law 225Google Scholar

Kanetake, M (2016a), ‘The Interfaces between the National and International Rule of Law: A Framework Paper’ in Kanetake, and Nollkaemper, (eds.), The Rule of Law at the National and International Levels: Contestations and Deference (Hart)Google Scholar

Kanetake, M (2016b), ‘Subsidiarity in the Practice of International Courts’ in Kanetake, and Nollkaemper, (eds.), The Rule of Law at the National and International Levels: Contestations and Deference (Hart)Google Scholar

Kanetake, M and Nollkaemper, A (eds.) (2016), The Rule of Law at the National and International Levels: Contestations and Deference (Hart)Google Scholar

Kanto, M (2017), ‘The Status of Municipal Law before the World Court in the Light of Recent Cases’ in Maluwa, et al. (eds.), The Pursuit of a Brave New World in International Law (Brill)Google Scholar

Kapeliuk, D (2010), ‘The Repeat Appointment Factor: Exploring Decision Patterns of Elite Investment Arbitrators’, 96 Cornell Law Review 47Google Scholar

Katselas, A (2012), ‘Do Investment Treaties Prescribe a Deferential Standard of Review?’, 34 Michigan Journal of International Law 87Google Scholar

Kaushal, A (2009), ‘Revisiting History: How the Past Matters for the Present Backlash Against the Foreign Investment Regime’, 50 Harvard International Law Journal 491Google Scholar

Kavanagh, A (2008), ‘Deference of Defiance?: The Limits of the Judicial Role in Constitutional Adjudication’ in Huscroft, (ed.), Expounding the Constitution: Essays in Constitutional Theory (Cambridge University Press)Google Scholar

Kavanagh, A (2014), ‘Proportionality and Parliamentary Debates: Exploring Some Forbidden Territory’, 34 Oxford Journal of Legal Studies 443Google Scholar

Kawano, M (2014), ‘Decisions of the International Court of Justice on Disputes Concerning Internal Law’ in Gaja, and Grote, Stoutenburg, (eds.), Enhancing the Rule of Law through the International Court of Justice (Brill)Google Scholar

Kelsen, H (1943), ‘Compulsory Adjudication of International Disputes’, 37 American Journal of International Law 397Google Scholar

Kelsen, H (1960), ‘Sovereignty and International Law’, 48 Georgetown Law Journal 627Google Scholar

Kelsen, H (2003), Principles of International Law (Lawbook Exchange)Google Scholar

Kennedy, D (2005), ‘Challenging Expert Rule: The Politics of Global Governance’, 27 Sydney Law Review 5Google Scholar

Keohane, RO, Moravcsik, A and Slaughter, A-M (2003),‘Legalized Dispute Resolution: Interstate and Transnational’ in Keohane, (ed.), Power and Governance in a Partially Globalized World (Routledge)Google Scholar

King, DB and Moloo, R (2014), ‘International Arbitrators as Lawmakers’, 46 International Law and Politics 875Google Scholar

King, JA (2008), ‘Institutional Approaches to Judicial Restraint: Judging the Scientific and Medical Literature’, 28 Oxford Journal of Legal Studies 409Google Scholar

King, JA (2012), Judging Social Rights (Cambridge University Press)Google Scholar

Kingsbury, B (1997), ‘The Concept of Compliance as a Function of Competing Conceptions of International Law’, 19 Michigan Journal of International Law 345Google Scholar

Kingsbury, B (2011), ‘International Courts: Uneven Judicialization in Global Order’ in Crawford, and Koskenniemi, (eds.), Cambridge Companion to International Law (Cambridge University Press)Google Scholar

Kjeldgaard-Pedersen, A (2010), ‘The Evolution of the Right of Individuals to Seise the European Court of Human Rights’, 12 Journal of the History of International Law 267Google Scholar

Kjeldgaard-Pedersen, A (2014), ‘The Influence of the Concept of International Legal Personality on the Drafting of the PCIJ Statute’, 16 Journal of the History of International Law 9Google Scholar

Kjos, HE (2013), Applicable Law in Investor-State Arbitration: The Interplay between National and International Law (1st edn, Oxford University Press)Google Scholar

Kjos, HE (2016), ‘Domestic Courts under Scrutiny: The Rule of Law as a Standard (of Deference) in Investor-State Arbitration’ in Kanetake, and Nollkaemper, (eds.), The Rule of Law at the National and International Levels: Contestations and Deference (Hart)Google Scholar

Klabbers, J (2009), ‘The Bridge Crack’d: A Critical Look at Interdisciplinary Relations’, 23 International Relations 119Google Scholar

Klabbers, J and Piiparinen, T (2013), ‘Normative Pluralism: An Exploration’ in Klabbers, and Piiparinen, (eds.), Normative Pluralism and International Law: Exploring Global Governance (Cambridge University Press)Google Scholar

Klabbers, J, Peters, A and Ulfstein, G (2009), The Constitutionalization of International Law (Oxford University Press)Google Scholar

Klager, R (2010), ‘Fair and Equitable Treatment: A Look at the Theoretical Underpinnings of Legitimacy and Fairness’, 11 Journal of World Investment & Trade 435Google Scholar

Kleinlein, T (2011), ‘Judicial Lawmaking by Judicial Restraint? The Potential of Balancing in International Economic Law’, 12 German Law Journal 1141Google Scholar

Knight, D (2018), Vigilance and Restraint in the Common Law of Judicial Review (Cambridge University Press)Google Scholar

Koessler, M (1947), “Subject”, “Citizen”, “National”, and “Permanent Allegiance”’, 64 South African Law Journal 350Google Scholar

Koh, HH (1996), ‘Transnational Legal Process’, 75 Nebraska Law Review 181Google Scholar

Koh, HH (1997), ‘Why Do Nations Obey International Law?’, 106 Yale Law Journal 2599Google Scholar

Koh, HH (2003), ‘On American Exceptionalism’, 55 Stanford Law Review 1479Google Scholar

Kolb, R (2007), ‘German Legal Scholarship as Reflected in Hague Academy Courses on Public International Law’, 50 German Yearbook of International Law 201Google Scholar

Kolb, R (2013), The International Court of Justice (Hart)Google Scholar

Kolb, R (2015), ‘The Jurisprudence of the Permanent Court of International Justice Between Utilitas Publica and Utilitas Singulorum’, 14 Law & Practice of International Courts and Tribunals 16Google Scholar

Korowicz, MS (1956), ‘The Problem of the International Personality of Individuals’, 50 American Journal of International Law 533Google Scholar

Korzun, V (2017), ‘The Right to Regulate in Investor-State Arbitration: Slicing and Dicing Regulatory Carve-Outs’, 50 Vanderbilt Journal of Transnational Law 355Google Scholar

Koskenniemi, M (1997), ‘Hierarchy in International Law: A Sketch’, 8 European Journal of International Law 566Google Scholar

Koskenniemi, M (2001), The Gentle Civilizer of Nations: The Rise and Fall of International Law, 1870–1960 (Cambridge University Press)Google Scholar

Koskenniemi, M (2006), From Apology to Utopia: The Structure of International Legal Argument (Cambridge University Press)Google Scholar

Koskenniemi, M (2014), ‘What Is International Law For?’ in Evans, (ed.), International Law (Oxford University Press)Google Scholar

Kratochvil, J (2011), ‘The Inflation of the Margin of Appreciation by the European Court of Human Rights’, 29 Netherlands Quarterly of Human Rights 324Google Scholar

Kratochwil, F (1982), ‘On the Notion of “Interest” in International Relations’, 36 International Organization 1Google Scholar