Book contents
- Frontmatter
- Contents
- List of illustrations
- List of contributors
- Acknowledgments
- Introduction
- 1 Short “Takes” on Austen: summarizing the controversy between literary purists and film enthusiasts
- 2 Janeite culture: what does the name “Jane Austen” authorize?
- 3 “Such a transformation!”: translation, imitation, and intertextuality in Jane Austen on screen
- 4 Two Mansfield Parks: purist and postmodern
- 5 Sense and Sensibility in a postfeminist world: sisterhood is still powerful
- 6 Regency romance shadowing in the visual motifs of Roger Michell's Persuasion
- 7 Filming romance: Persuasion
- 8 Emma, interrupted: speaking Jane Austen in fiction and film
- 9 Reimagining Jane Austen: the 1940 and 1995 film versions of Pride and Prejudice
- 10 Emma and the art of adaptation
- 11 Clues for the clueless
- Questions for discussion
- Filmography
- Bibliography
- Index
10 - Emma and the art of adaptation
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 05 June 2012
- Frontmatter
- Contents
- List of illustrations
- List of contributors
- Acknowledgments
- Introduction
- 1 Short “Takes” on Austen: summarizing the controversy between literary purists and film enthusiasts
- 2 Janeite culture: what does the name “Jane Austen” authorize?
- 3 “Such a transformation!”: translation, imitation, and intertextuality in Jane Austen on screen
- 4 Two Mansfield Parks: purist and postmodern
- 5 Sense and Sensibility in a postfeminist world: sisterhood is still powerful
- 6 Regency romance shadowing in the visual motifs of Roger Michell's Persuasion
- 7 Filming romance: Persuasion
- 8 Emma, interrupted: speaking Jane Austen in fiction and film
- 9 Reimagining Jane Austen: the 1940 and 1995 film versions of Pride and Prejudice
- 10 Emma and the art of adaptation
- 11 Clues for the clueless
- Questions for discussion
- Filmography
- Bibliography
- Index
Summary
Prior to the Jane Austen boom of the 1990s, almost all film versions of her novels were made for television and conformed to the conventions of the BBC classic drama house style. Film adaptations such as Emma (1972), Pride and Prejudice (1979), Mansfield Park (1983), and Sense and Sensibility (1981/1985) are, therefore, characterized by their textual fidelity, solid acting, and use of historically accurate settings and costumes. However, pleasing as it has been to millions of viewers, the “verisimilitude” carefully cultivated by televisual renderings of the Austen canon is usually “superficial” and serves as a substitute for any attempt to point up the complexities of character and theme that lie beneath the polished surface of her novels. Pre-1990 BBC adaptations also tend to make use of unobtrusive and conservative camera and editing techniques that reflect their creators' unwillingness to rethink Austen's novels in visual terms. By and large, televised versions of Austen function as illustrated supplements to the original novels rather than as independent works of art. The only exception to this norm is the 1987 feature-length production of Northanger Abbey, which – as its lurid dramatizations of Catherine Morland's Gothic imaginings and its willingness to take liberties with Austen's text demonstrate – is free from the kind of stultifying reverence for a classic work that, in George Bluestone's opinion, usually “inhibit[s] the plastic imagination.”
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- Jane Austen on Screen , pp. 197 - 227Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2003
- 5
- Cited by