Book contents
- Jane Austen and Other Minds
- Cambridge Studies in Romanticism
- Jane Austen and Other Minds
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Acknowledgments
- Abbreviations
- Introduction
- Chapter 1 Austen and Austin
- Chapter 2 Intelligible Community
- Chapter 3 Sense and Sensibility and Suffering
- Chapter 4 Pride and Prejudice and the Comedy of Perfectionism
- Chapter 5 Perlocutionary Entailments
- Chapter 6 Emma and Other Minds
- Chapter 7 Persuasion, Conviction, and Care Jane Austen’s Keeping
- Notes
- Bibliography
- Index
- Cambridge Studies in Romanticism
- References
Bibliography
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 04 November 2022
Book contents
- Jane Austen and Other Minds
- Cambridge Studies in Romanticism
- Jane Austen and Other Minds
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Acknowledgments
- Abbreviations
- Introduction
- Chapter 1 Austen and Austin
- Chapter 2 Intelligible Community
- Chapter 3 Sense and Sensibility and Suffering
- Chapter 4 Pride and Prejudice and the Comedy of Perfectionism
- Chapter 5 Perlocutionary Entailments
- Chapter 6 Emma and Other Minds
- Chapter 7 Persuasion, Conviction, and Care Jane Austen’s Keeping
- Notes
- Bibliography
- Index
- Cambridge Studies in Romanticism
- References
Summary
A summary is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- Jane Austen and Other MindsOrdinary Language Philosophy in Literary Fiction, pp. 264 - 277Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2022
References
Agamben, Giorgio. The Highest Poverty. Trans. Adam Kotsko. Stanford: Stanford University Press, 2011.Google Scholar
Alfano, Chiara. “Toward an Ordinary Language Psychoanalysis: On Skepticism and Infancy.” New Literary History 49.1 (2018). 23–45.Google Scholar
Altieri, Charles. “Cavell and Wittgenstein on Morality: The Limits of Acknowledgment.” Stanley Cavell and Literary Studies: Consequences of Skepticism. Ed. Eldridge, Richard and Rhie, Bernard. New York and London: Continuum, 2011. 62–77.Google Scholar
Altieri, Charles. “Style.” Oxford Handbook of Philosophy and Literature. Ed. Eldridge, Richard. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2009. 420–439.Google Scholar
Aristotle, . On Rhetoric: A Theory of Civic Discourse. Trans. George A. Kennedy. New York: Oxford University Press, 1991.Google Scholar
Armstrong, Nancy. Desire and Domestic Fiction: A Political History of the Novel. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1987.Google Scholar
Armstrong, Nancy. “The Fiction of Bourgeois Morality and the Paradox of Individualism.” The Novel, Volume 2: Forms and Themes. Ed. Moretti, Franco. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2007. 349–388.Google Scholar
Arsic, Branka. On Leaving: A Reading in Emerson. Cambridge: Cambridge, MA Harvard University Press, 2010.Google Scholar
Austen, Jane. Juvenilia. Ed. Sabor, Peter. The Cambridge Edition of the Works of Jane Austen. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2006.Google Scholar
Austen, Jane. Later Manuscripts. Ed. Todd, Janet and Bree, Linda. The Cambridge Edition of the Works of Jane Austen. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2013.Google Scholar
Austen-Leigh, James Edward. A Memoir of Jane Austen [1870]. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2002.Google Scholar
Austin, John Langshaw. “Intelligent Behavior.” Review of Gilbert Ryle, The Concept of Mind, Ryle. Ed. Wood, Oscar P. and Pitcher, George. London and Basingstoke: Macmillan, 1970. 45–51.Google Scholar
Banfield, Ann. The Phantom Table: Woolf, Fry, Russell and the Epistemology of Modernism. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2000.Google Scholar
Barchas, Janine. Matters of Fact in Jane Austen: History, Location, and Celebrity. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press, 2012.Google Scholar
Barthes, Roland. How to Live Together: Novelistic Simulations of Some Everyday Spaces. Trans. Kate Briggs. New York: Columbia University Press, 2012.Google Scholar
Baz, Avner. When Words Are Called For: A Defense of Ordinary Language Philosophy. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 2012.Google Scholar
Beckwith, Sarah. “Are There Any Women in Shakespeare’s Plays? Fiction, Representation, and Reality in Feminist Criticism.” New Literary History 46.2 (2015). 241–260.Google Scholar
Beckwith, Sarah. Shakespeare and the Grammar of Forgiveness. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, 2011.Google Scholar
Benjamin, Walter. “Goethe’s Elective Affinities.” Selected Writings, Vol. 1, 1913–1926. Ed. Bullock, Marcus and Jennings, Michael W.. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 2004. 297–360.Google Scholar
Berlant, Lauren, and Warner, Michael. “Sex in Public.” Critical Inquiry 24.2 (Winter 1998). 547–566.Google Scholar
Berlant, Lauren, and Ngai, Sianne. “Comedy Has Issues.” Critical Inquiry 43.2 (Winter 2017). 233–249.Google Scholar
Berlin, Isaiah. The Roots of Romanticism. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1999.Google Scholar
Boswell, James. The Life of Samuel Johnson [1791]. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1980.Google Scholar
Boyd, Brian. “Does Austen Need Narrators? Does Anyone?” New Literary History 48.2 (2017). 285–308.Google Scholar
Bree, Linda. “The Literary Context.” The Cambridge Companion to Pride and Prejudice. Ed. Todd, Janet. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2013. 56–66.Google Scholar
Brewer, Charlotte. “‘That Reliance on the Ordinary’: Jane Austen and the Oxford English Dictionary.” Review of English Studies 66.276 (2015). 744–765.Google Scholar
Britton, Jeanne M. “‘To Know What You Are All Thinking’: Riddles and Minds in Jane Austen’s Emma.” Poetics Today 39.4 (2018). 651–677.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bromwich, David. “Introduction.” Selected Poetry of William Wordsworth. Ed. Van Doren, Mark. New York: Random House, 2002. xv–xx.Google Scholar
Burney, Fanny, Cecilia, or Memoires of an Heiress [1782]. New York: Virago Press, 1986.Google Scholar
Butler, Judith. Excitable Speech: A Politics of the Performative. New York and London: Routledge, 1997.Google Scholar
Byrne, Paula. Belle: The Slave Daughter and the Lord Chief Justice. New York: HarperCollins, 2014.Google Scholar
Byrne, Paula. The Real Jane Austen: A Life in Small Things. New York: HarperCollins, 2013.Google Scholar
Carlson, Jennifer D., and Stewart, Kathleen C.. “The Legibilities of Mood Work.” New Formations: A Journal of Culture/Theory/Politics 82.1 (2014). 114–133.Google Scholar
Cassin, Barbara. Sophistical Practice: Toward a Consistent Relativism. New York: Fordham University Press, 2014.Google Scholar
Cassin, Barbara, Apter, Emily, Lezra, Jacques, and Wood, Michael. Eds. Dictionary of Untranslatables: A Philosophical Lexicon. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2014.Google Scholar
Castle, Terry. Boss Ladies, Watch Out! Essays on Women, Sex, and Writing. New York: Routledge, 2002.Google Scholar
Cavell, Stanley. “Benjamin and Wittgenstein: Signals and Affinities.” Critical Inquiry 25.2 (1999). 245–256.Google Scholar
Cavell, Stanley. Cities of Words: Pedagogical Letters on a Register of the Moral Life. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 2004.Google Scholar
Cavell, Stanley. Conditions Handsome and Unhandsome: The Constitution of Emersonian Perfectionism. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1990.Google Scholar
Cavell, Stanley. Disowning Knowledge in Seven Plays of Shakespeare. Updated edition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2003.Google Scholar
Cavell, Stanley. Emerson’s Transcendental Etudes. Stanford: Stanford University Press, 2003.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cavell, Stanley. et al. Philosophy and Animal Life. New York: Columbia University Press, 2008.Google Scholar
Cavell, Stanley. The World Viewed: Reflections on the Ontology of Film. Enlarged Edition. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1979.Google Scholar
Chandler, James. An Archaeology of Sympathy: The Sentimental Mode of Literature and Cinema. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2013.Google Scholar
Chaouli, Michel. Thinking with Kant’s Critique of Judgment. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 2017.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Charise, Andrea. “‘The Tyranny of Age: Godwin’s St. Leon and the Nineteenth Century Longevity Narrative.” ELH 79.4 (2012). 905–933.Google Scholar
Clery, Emma J. “Conversations on Political Economy in Sanditon.” Persuasions 38.2 (2018).Google Scholar
Cohn, Dorrit. Transparent Minds: Narrative Modes for Presenting Consciousness in Fiction. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1984.Google Scholar
Crary, Alice. “Austin and the Ethics of Discourse.” Reading Cavell. Ed. Crary, Alice and Shieh, Sanford. Abingdon: Routledge, 2006. 42–67.Google Scholar
Critchley, Simon. “Cavell’s ‘Romanticism’ and Cavell’s Romanticism.” Contending with Stanley Cavell. Ed. Goodman, Russell B.. New York: Oxford University Press, 2005. 37–54.Google Scholar
Critchley, Simon. Very Little … Almost Nothing: Death, Philosophy, and Literature, second edition. New York: Routledge, 2004.Google Scholar
Culler, Jonathan. Literary Theory: A Very Short Introduction. New York: Oxford University Press, 2011.Google Scholar
Culler, Jonathan and Glaser, Ben. Eds. Critical Rhythm. New York: Fordham University Press, 2019.Google Scholar
Dadlez, Eva M. Ed. Jane Austen’s Emma: Philosophical Perspectives. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2018.Google Scholar
Dadlez, E. M. “Jane Austen on Moral Luck.” Jane Austen and Philosophy. Ed. Marinucci, Mimi. London: Rowman & Littlefield, 2016. 95–106.Google Scholar
Das, Veena. Life and Words: Violence and the Descent into the Ordinary. Berkeley: University of California Press, 2007.Google Scholar
Davidson, Arnold. Ed. Foucault and His Interlocutors. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1997.Google Scholar
Davidson, Jenny. Reading Style: A Life in Sentences. New York: Columbia University Press, 2014.Google Scholar
Davis, Colin. Critical Excess: Overreading in Derrida, Deleuze, Levinas, Zizek and Cavell. Stanford: Stanford University Press, 2010.Google Scholar
Deleuze, Gilles. Cinema 2, The Time-Image. Trans. Hugh Tomlinson and Robert Galeta. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press, 1989.Google Scholar
Deresiewicz, William. Jane Austen and the Romantic Poets. New York: Columbia University Press, 2004.Google Scholar
Derrida, Jacques. The Animal That Therefore I Am. Ed. Mallet, Marie-Louise. Trans. David Wills. New York: Fordham University Press, 2008.Google Scholar
Derrida, Jacques. The Beast and the Sovereign, Vol. II. Ed. Lisse, Michel et al. Trans. Geoffrey Bennington. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2011.Google Scholar
Derrida, Jacques. “Declarations of Independence.” Trans. Tom Keenan and Tom Pepper. New Political Science 7.1 (1986). 7–15.Google Scholar
Derrida, Jacques. “Typewriter Ribbon: Limited Inc (2)(‘within such limits’).” Material Events: Paul de Man and the Afterlife of Theory. Ed. Cohen, Tom et al. University of Minnesota Press, 2001. 277–360.Google Scholar
Dewey, John. The Quest for Certainty: A Study of the Relation of Knowledge and Action. London: Allen & Unwin, 1930.Google Scholar
Dewey, John. “Self-Realization as the Moral Ideal.” The Philosophical Review 2.6 (1893). 652–664.Google Scholar
Doody, Margaret Anne. Frances Burney: The Life in the Works. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press, 1988.Google Scholar
Doody, Margaret Anne. “Introduction.” Sense and Sensibility. By Jane Austen. Ed. Kinsley, James. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2004. vii–xxxix.Google Scholar
Doody, Margaret Anne. Jane Austen’s Names: Riddles, Persons, Places. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2015.Google Scholar
Dolven, Jeff. “The Scandal of Style: Jeff Dolven Interviewed by Louis Bury.” Bomb (September 5, 2018).Google Scholar
Dow, Gillian, and Halsey, Katie. “Jane Austen’s Reading: The Chawton Years.” Persuasions 30.2 (2010).Google Scholar
Duckworth, Alistair M. The Improvement of the Estate: A Study of Jane Austen’s Novels. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press, 1972.Google Scholar
Duffy, Edward T. Secular Mysteries: Stanley Cavell and English Romanticism. New York and London: Bloomsbury, 2013.Google Scholar
Eaves, Morris, and Fischer, Michael. Eds. Romanticism and Contemporary Criticism. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, 1986.Google Scholar
Edelman, Lee. No Future: Queer Theory and the Death Drive. Durham, NC: Duke University Press, 2005.Google Scholar
Eldridge, Richard. Leading a Human Life: Wittgenstein, Intentionality, and Romanticism. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1997.Google Scholar
Evans, K. L. “While Reading Wittgenstein.” Stanley Cavell: Philosophy, Literature and Criticism. Ed. Loxley, James and Taylor, Andrew. Manchester and New York: Manchester University Press, 2011. 137–149.Google Scholar
Favret, Mary A. War at a Distance: Romanticism and the Making of Modern Wartime. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2010.Google Scholar
Felman, Shoshana. “Barbara Johnson’s Last Book.” A Life with Mary Shelley. Stanford: Stanford University Press, 2014. 123–158.Google Scholar
Ferguson, Frances. “Jane Austen, Emma, and the Impact of Form.” MLQ 61.1 (2000). 157–180.Google Scholar
Fischer, Michael. Stanley Cavell and Literary Skepticism. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1989.Google Scholar
Flesch, William. “Hyperbolic Discounting and Temporal Bargaining.” Theory Aside. Ed. Potts, Jason and Stout, Daniel. Durham, NC: Duke University Press, 2014. 199–217.Google Scholar
Foucault, Michel. The Government of Self and Others: Lectures at the Collège de France, 1982–1983. Ed. Gros, Frédéric. Trans. Graham Burchell. Houndmills: Palgrave Macmillan, 2010.Google Scholar
François, Anne-Lise. Open Secrets: The Literature of Uncounted Experience. Stanford: Stanford University Press, 2008.Google Scholar
François, Anne-Lise. “Passing Judgement, Conceding Perfection.” Stanley Cavell and the Event of Romanticism. Ed. Lindstrom, Eric. Romantic Circles Praxis Series (2014).Google Scholar
Freud, Sigmund. “Humour.” The Standard Edition of the Complete Psychological Works of Sigmund Freud, vol. 21. Trans. James Strachey. London: Hogarth Press, 1961.Google Scholar
Fricker, Miranda. Epistemic Injustice: Power and the Ethics of Knowing. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2007.Google Scholar
Fricker, Miranda. “Review of Beyond Moral Judgment. By Alice Crary.” European Journal of Philosophy 18.2 (2010). 311–315.Google Scholar
Fry, Paul H. William Empson: Prophet against Sacrifice. London and New York: Routledge, 1991.Google Scholar
Fryer, Paul. Staying Power: The History of Black People in Britain [1984]. London: Verso, 2010.Google Scholar
Gallagher, Catherine. “The Rise of Fictionality.” The Novel, Volume 1: History, Geography and Culture. Ed. Moretti, Franco. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2006. 336–363.Google Scholar
Galperin, William. The Historical Austen (Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press, 2003).Google Scholar
Galperin, William. The History of Missed Opportunities: British Romanticism and the Emergence of the Everyday. Stanford: Stanford University Press, 2017.Google Scholar
Garcia, Christien. “Left Hanging: Silence, Suspension, and Desire in Jane Austen’s Persuasion.” The Eighteenth Century 59.1 (2018). 85–103.Google Scholar
de Gaynesford, Maximilian. “How Not to Do Things with Words: J.L. Austin on Poetry.” British Journal of Aesthetics 51.1 (2011). 31–49.Google Scholar
de Gaynesford, Maximilian. The Rift in the Lute: Attuning Poetry and Philosophy. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2017.Google Scholar
Ghosh, Amitav. The Great Derangement: Climate Change and the Unthinkable. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2016.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gibson, James J. Reasons for Realism: Selected Essays of James J. Gibson. Ed. Reed, Edward and Jones, Rebecca. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum, 1982.Google Scholar
Gikandi, Simon. Slavery and the Culture of Taste. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2011.Google Scholar
Glaude, Eddie S. “On Prophecy and Critical Intelligence.” American Journal of Theology and Philosophy 32.2 (2011). 105–121.Google Scholar
Godwin, William. Enquiry Concerning Political Justice and Its Influence on Modern Morals and Happiness [1793]. Harmondsworth: Penguin, 1985.Google Scholar
Godwin, William. Fleetwood [1806]. Ed. Handwerk, Gary and Markley, Arnold A.. Peterborough, ON: Broadview, 2001.Google Scholar
Goethe, Johann Wolfgang von. Elective Affinities [1809]. Trans. R. J. Hollingdale. Harmondsworth: Penguin, 1971.Google Scholar
Gould, Timothy. “The Names of Action.” Stanley Cavell. Ed. Eldridge, Richard. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2003. 48–78.Google Scholar
Graham, Peter W. “‘I Want to Be a Scavenger’: A Conversation with Whit Stillman.” Persuasions 38.1 (2017).Google Scholar
Green, Mitchell. “Speech Acts: An Annotated Bibliography.” The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (2021). https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/fall2021/entries/speech-acts/.Google Scholar
Gross, Kenneth. Puppet: An Essay on Uncanny Life. Chicago: Chicago University Press, 2011.Google Scholar
Guyer, Sara. Reading with John Clare: Biopoetics, Sovereignty, Romanticism. New York: Fordham University Press, 2015.Google Scholar
Halperin, John. The Life of Jane Austen. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press, 1984.Google Scholar
Hampshire, Stuart, and Berlin, Isaiah. “‘I’m Going to Tamper with Your Beliefs a Little.’” The Isaiah Berlin Virtual Library.Google Scholar
Han, Clara and Das, Veena. Eds. Living and Dying in the Contemporary World: A Compendium. Oakland: University of California Press, 2016.Google Scholar
Harding, D. W. Regulated Hatred and Other Essays on Jane Austen. Ed. Lawlor, Monica. Atlantic Highlands, NJ: Athlone Press, 1998.Google Scholar
Harding, D. W. Words into Rhythm: English Speech Rhythm in Verse and Prose. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1976.Google Scholar
Harman, Graham. Guerilla Metaphysics: Phenomenology and the Carpentry of Things. Chicago: Open Court, 2005.Google Scholar
Harris, Daniel, Fogal, Daniel, and Moss, Matt. Eds. New Work on Speech Acts. New York: Oxford University Press, 2017.Google Scholar
Hays, Mary. The Victim of Prejudice [1799]. Ed. Ty, Eleanor; second edition. Peterborough, ON: Broadview, 1998.Google Scholar
Hazlitt, William. Selected Writings. Ed. Cook, Jon. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1991.Google Scholar
Hegel, Georg Wilhelm Friedrich. The Phenomenology of Spirit [1807]. Trans. Miller, A. V.. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1977.Google Scholar
Heydt-Stevenson, Jill. Austen’s Unbecoming Conjunctions: Subversive Laughter, Embodied History. Houndmills: Palgrave, 2008.Google Scholar
Hopkins, Robert. “General Tilney and the Affairs of State: The Political Gothic in Northanger Abbey.” Philological Quarterly 57.2 (1978). 213–224.Google Scholar
Hopkins, Robert. “Moral Luck and Judgment in Jane Austen’s Persuasion.” Nineteenth-Century Literature 42.2 (1987). 143–158.Google Scholar
Hume, David. Selected Essays. Ed. Copley, Stephen and Edgar, Andrew. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1996.Google Scholar
Igarashi, Yohei. The Connected Condition: Romanticism and the Dream of Communication. Stanford: Stanford University Press, 2019.Google Scholar
Jacobs, Carol. Uncontainable Romanticism: Shelley, Brontë, Kleist. Baltimore, MD: John Hopkins University Press, 1989.Google Scholar
Jager, Colin. The Book of God: Secularization and Design in the Romantic Era. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press, 2006.Google Scholar
Johnson, Barbara. A World of Difference. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press, 1987.Google Scholar
Johnson, Claudia L. Jane Austen’s Cults and Cultures. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2012.Google Scholar
Johnson, Claudia L. Jane Austen: Women, Politics, and the Novel. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1988.Google Scholar
Johnson, Claudia L. and Tuite, Clara. Eds. A Companion to Jane Austen. Malden, MA: Wiley-Blackwell, 2009.Google Scholar
Johnson, Samuel. The Oxford Authors: Samuel Johnson. Ed. Greene, Donald. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1984.Google Scholar
Johnston, Freya. “Jane Austen’s Universals.” Essays in Criticism 68.2 (2018). 211–233.Google Scholar
Kaplan, Deborah. “‘There She Is at Last’: The Byrne Portrait Controversy.” Persuasions 34 (2012). 121–133.Google Scholar
Keymer, Thomas. “Narrative.” The Cambridge Companion to Pride and Prejudice. Ed. Todd, Janet. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2013. 1–14.Google Scholar
Kleinman, Arthur, Das, Veena, and Lock, Margaret. Eds. Social Suffering. Berkeley: University of California Press, 1997.Google Scholar
Knox-Shaw, Peter. Jane Austen and the Enlightenment. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2004.Google Scholar
Knox-Shaw, Peter. “Philosophy.” Jane Austen in Context. Ed. Todd, Janet. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2005. 346–356.Google Scholar
Kornbluh, Anna. “We Have Never Been Critical: Toward the Novel as Critique.” Novel: A Forum on Fiction 50.3 (2017). 397–408.Google Scholar
Kramnick, Jonathan. Paper Minds: Literature and the Ecology of Consciousness. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2018.Google Scholar
Kramnick, Jonathan, and Nersessian, Anahid. “Form and Explanation.” Critical Inquiry 43.3 (Spring 2017). 650–669.Google Scholar
Kurnick, David. “A Few Lies: Queer Theory and Our Method Melodramas.” ELH 27.2 (2020). 349–374.Google Scholar
Kurnick, David. “Jane Austen, Secret Celebrity, and Mass Eroticism.” New Literary History 52.1 (2021). 53–75.Google Scholar
Lacoue-Labarthe, Phillipe, and Nancy, Jean-Luc. The Literary Absolute. Albany: State University of New York Press, 1988.Google Scholar
Lamb, Charles. Essays of Elia and Last Essays of Elia [1823, 1833]. London: Dent, 1962.Google Scholar
Langton, Rae. Sexual Solipsism: Philosophical Essays on Pornography and Objectification. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2009.Google Scholar
Laugier, Sandra. “Matter and Mind: Cavell’s (Concept of) Importance.” MLN 126.5 (2011). 994–1003.Google Scholar
Laugier, Sandra. Why We Need Ordinary Language Philosophy. Trans. Daniela Ginsburg. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2013.Google Scholar
Leavis, Q. D. “A Critical Theory of Jane Austen’s Writings, II.” Scrutiny (January, 1942). 272–294.Google Scholar
Lee, Wendy Anne. Failures of Feeling: Insensibility and the Novel. Stanford: Stanford University Press, 2019.Google Scholar
Lee, Wendy Anne. “Resituating ‘Regulated Hatred’: D. W. Harding’s Jane Austen.” ELH 77.4 (2010). 995–1014.Google Scholar
LeFaye, Deirdre. Jane Austen: A Family Record, second edition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2003.Google Scholar
LeFaye, Deirdre. Ed. Jane Austen’s Letters, third edition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1995.Google Scholar
Lefebvre, Henri. Rhythmanalysis: Space, Time, and Everyday Life. Trans. Stuart Elden and Moore, Gerald. London: Bloomsbury, 2013.Google Scholar
Levine, Caroline. Forms: Whole, Rhythm, Hierarchy, Network. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2015.Google Scholar
Levine, George. Darwin and the Novelists: Patterns of Science in Victorian Fiction. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1988.Google Scholar
Lezra, Jacques. On the Nature of Marx’s Things: Translation as Necrophilology. New York: Fordham University Press, 2018.Google Scholar
Lindstrom, Eric. “Critical Judgment and Free Indirect Style.” Style and Romantic Fiction. Ed. Toner, Anne. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, forthcoming.Google Scholar
Lindstrom, Eric. “Perlocution and the Rights of Desire: Cavell, Nietzsche, and Austen (and Austin).” Conversations 4 (2016). 26–42.Google Scholar
Lindstrom, Eric. Ed. Stanley Cavell and the Event of Romanticism. Romantic Circles Praxis Series (2014).Google Scholar
Lingis, Alphonso. The Community of Those Who Have Nothing in Common. Bloomington: Indiana University Press, 1994.Google Scholar
Litvak, Joseph. Strange Gourmets: Sophistication, Theory, and the Novel. Durham, NC and London: Duke University Press, 1997.Google Scholar
Locke, John. An Essay Concerning Human Understanding [1689]. Ed. Woolhouse, Roger. London: Penguin, 1997.Google Scholar
Lorenzini, Daniele. Éthique et politique de soi: Foucault, Hadot, Cavell et les techniques de l’ordinaire. Paris: Vrin, 2015.Google Scholar
Lorenzini, Daniele. “From Recognition to Acknowledgment: Rethinking the Perlocutionary.” Inquiry (January, 2020).Google Scholar
Lorenzini, Daniele. “Performative, Passionate, and Parrhesiastic Utterance: On Cavell, Foucault, and Truth as an Ethical Force.” Critical Inquiry 41.2 (2015). 254–268.Google Scholar
Lorenzini, Daniele, and Neer, Richard. “Introduction: Davidson and his Interlocutors.” Critical Inquiry 45.2 (2019). 255–259.Google Scholar
Lynch, Deidre. The Economy of Character: Novels, Market Culture, and the Business of Inner Meaning. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1998.Google Scholar
Lynch, Deidre. “Introduction.” Persuasion. By Jane Austen. Ed. Kinsley, James. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2004. vii–xxxiii.Google Scholar
Lynch, Deidre. Ed. Janeites: Austen’s Disciples and Devotees. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2000.Google Scholar
Lynch, Deidre. Loving Literature: A Cultural History. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2015.Google Scholar
MacPherson, Sandra. “Rent to Own; or, What’s Entailed in Pride and Prejudice?” Representations 82.1 (2003). 1–23.Google Scholar
Malabou, Catherine. Ontology of the Accident: An Essay on Destructive Plasticity. Trans. Carolyn Shread. Cambridge and Malden, MA: Polity, 2012.Google Scholar
Manning, Susan. “Sensibility.” The Cambridge Companion to English Literature, 1740–1830. Eds. Keymer, Thomas and Mee, Jon. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2004. 80–99.Google Scholar
Marshall, Peter. Ed. Romantic Rationalist: A William Godwin Reader. Oakland: PM Press, 2017.Google Scholar
Martin, Kirsten. “In Want of Keeping: Painting and the Sympathetic Imagination of Frankenstein.” Eighteenth-Century Fiction. 32.4 (2020). 599–618.Google Scholar
Matz, Jesse. “Cultures of Impression.” Bad Modernisms. Ed. Mao, Douglas and Walkowitz, Rebecca L. (Durham, NC and London: Duke University Press, 2006). 298–330.Google Scholar
McCormick, Samuel. The Chattering Mind: A Conceptual History of Everyday Talk. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2020.Google Scholar
Mee, Jon. Conversable Worlds: Literature, Contention, and Community 1762 to 1830. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2011.Google Scholar
Mellor, Anne K., and Milsom, Alex L.. “Austen’s Fanny Price, Grateful Negroes, and the Stockholm Syndrome.” Persuasions 34 (2012). 222–235.Google Scholar
Menely, Tobias. The Animal Claim: Sensibility and the Creaturely Voice. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2015.Google Scholar
Michie, Elsie B. “Rich Woman, Poor Woman: Toward an Anthropology of the Nineteenth-Century Marriage Plot.” PMLA 124.2 (2009). 421–436.Google Scholar
Miller, Andrew H. The Burdens of Perfection: On Ethics and Reading in Nineteenth-Century British Literature. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, 2008.Google Scholar
Miller, Andrew H. “Implicative Criticism, or the Display of Thinking.” New Literary History 44.3 (2013). 345–360.Google Scholar
Miller, Andrew H. “Perfectly Helpless.” Modern Language Quarterly 63.1 (March 2002) 65–88.Google Scholar
Miller, J. Hillis. “Performativity as Performance/ Performativity as Speech Act: Derrida’s Special Theory of Performativity.” South Atlantic Quarterly 106.2 (Spring 2007). 219–235.Google Scholar
Miller, J. Hillis. Speech Acts in Literature. Stanford: Stanford University Press, 2002.Google Scholar
Miller, Steven and Guyer, Sara. “Introduction: Literature and the Right to Marriage.” Diacritics 35.4 (2005). 3–22Google Scholar
Milnes, Tim. The Testimony of Sense: Empiricism and the Essay from Hume to Hazlitt. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2019.Google Scholar
Milnes, Tim. “Trusting Experiments: Sociability and Transcendence in the Familiar Essay.” The Prose of Romanticism. Ed. Lee, Yoon Sun. Romantic Circles Praxis Series (2017).Google Scholar
Moi, Toril. Revolution of the Ordinary: Literary Studies after Wittgenstein, Austin, and Cavell. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2017.Google Scholar
Mooney White, Laura, and Smith, Carmen. “Discerning Voice through Austen Said: Free Indirect Discourse, Coding, and Interpretive (Un)Certainty.” Persuasions 37.1 (2016).Google Scholar
Moran, Richard. The Exchange of Words: Speech, Testimony, and Intersubjectivity. New York: Oxford University Press, 2018.Google Scholar
Moretti, Franco. The Bourgeois: Between History and Literature. New York: Verso, 2013.Google Scholar
Moretti, Franco. Graphs, Maps, Trees: Abstract Models for Literary History. London: Verso, 2005.Google Scholar
Morrison, Robert. The Regency Years: During Which Jane Austen Writes, Napoleon Fights, Byron Makes Love, and Britain Becomes Modern. New York: Norton, 2019.Google Scholar
Mudrick, Marvin. Nobody Here but Us Chickens. Ticknor & Fields: New Haven and New York, 1981.Google Scholar
Mulhall, Stephen The Wounded Animal: J.M. Coetzee and the Difficulty of Reality in Literature and Philosophy. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2009.Google Scholar
Nancy, Jean-Luc. Hegel: The Restlessness of the Negative. Trans. Jason Smith and Steven Miller. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press, 2002.Google Scholar
Nazar, Hina. Enlightened Sentiments: Judgment and Autonomy in the Age of Sensibility. New York: Fordham University Press, 2012.Google Scholar
Nazar, Hina. “The Imagination Goes Visiting: Jane Austen, Judgment, and the Social.” Nineteenth-Century Literature 59.2 (2004). 145–78.Google Scholar
Nersessian, Anahid. Utopia, Limited: Romanticism and Adjustment. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 2015.Google Scholar
Ngai, Sianne. Our Aesthetic Categories: Zany, Cute, Interesting. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 2012.Google Scholar
Norval, Aletta J. “Moral Perfectionism and Democratic Responsiveness: Reading Cavell with Foucault.” Ethics & Global Politics 4.4 (2011). 207–229.Google Scholar
O’Farrell, Mary Ann. “‘Bin Laden a Huge Jane Austen Fan’: Jane Austen in Contemporary Political Discourse.” Uses of Austen: Jane’s Afterlives. Eds. Dow, Gillian and Hanson, Clare. Houndmills: Palgrave Macmillan, 2012. 192–207.Google Scholar
Ohi, Kevin. Henry James and the Queerness of Style. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press, 2011.Google Scholar
Oksenberg Rorty, Amélie. “Characters, Persons, Selves, Individuals.” Theory of the Novel: A Historical Approach. Ed. McKeon, Michael. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press, 2000. 537–553.Google Scholar
Ong, Yi-Ping. The Art of Being: Poetics of the Novel and Existentialist Philosophy. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 2018.Google Scholar
Ostas, Magdalena. “Kant with Michael Fried: Feeling, Absorption, and Interiority in the Critique of Judgment.” Symploke 18.1–2 (2010). 15–30.Google Scholar
Owen, David. “Perfectionism, Parrhesia, and the Care of the Self: Foucault and Cavell on Ethics and Politics.” Stanley Cavell and the Claim to Community. Ed. Norris, Andrew. Stanford: Stanford University Press, 2006. 128–155.Google Scholar
Peacock, Thomas Love. Nightmare Abbey and Crotchet Castle [1818, 1831]. Harmondsworth: Penguin, 1979.Google Scholar
Philp, Mark. “William Godwin.” The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Summer 2017). Ed. Zalta, Edward N.. https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/sum2017/entries/godwin/.Google Scholar
Pinch, Adela. Strange Fits of Passion: Epistemologies of Emotion, Hume to Austen. Stanford: Stanford University Press, 1996.Google Scholar
Pinch, Adela. Thinking About Other People in Nineteenth-Century British Writing. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2010.Google Scholar
Pippen, Robert. After the Beautiful: Hegel and the Philosophy of Pictorial Modernism. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2014.Google Scholar
Pollack-Pelzner, Daniel. “Jane Austen, the Prose Shakespeare.” SEL 53.4 (2013). 763–792.Google Scholar
Poovey, Mary. Genres of the Credit Economy: Mediating Value in Eighteenth- and Nineteenth-Century Britain. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2008.Google Scholar
Quinn, Megan. “The Sensation of Language in Austen’s Persuasion.” Eighteenth Century Fiction 30.2 (2017–18). 243–263.Google Scholar
Richards, , Ivor Armstrong. Practical Criticism: A Study of Literary Judgment. New York: Harvest, 1929.Google Scholar
Richardson, Alan. The Neural Sublime: Cognitive Theories and Romantic Texts. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press, 2010.Google Scholar
Read, Rupert. “Wittgenstein’s Philosophical Investigations as a War Book.” New Literary History 41.3 (2010). 593–612.Google Scholar
Rohrbach, Emily. Modernity’s Mist: British Romanticism and the Poetics of Anticipation. New York: Fordham University Press, 2016.Google Scholar
Rossetti, Christina. The Complete Poems. Ed. Crump, Rebecca W. and Flowers, Betty S.. London: Penguin, 2005.Google Scholar
Rothman, William. Must We Kill the Thing We Love? Emersonian Perfectionism and the Films of Alfred Hitchcock. New York: Columbia University Press, 2014.Google Scholar
Rousseau, Jean-Jacques. The First and Second Discourses. Trans. Roger D. Masters and Judith R. Masters. Boston: Bedford/ St. Martin’s, 1964.Google Scholar
Rousseau, Jean-Jacques. The Major Political Writings of Jean-Jacques Rousseau. Trans. and Ed. John T. Scott. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2012.Google Scholar
Rudrum, David. Stanley Cavell and the Claim of Literature. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press, 2013.Google Scholar
Russell, John. Henry Green: Nine Novels and an Unpacked Bag. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press, 1960.Google Scholar
Russett, Margaret. “Persuasion, Mediation.” Studies in Romanticism 53.3 (2014). 417–433.Google Scholar
Sedgwick, Eve Kosofsky. Epistemology of the Closet. Berkeley: University of California Press, 1990.Google Scholar
Sedgwick, Eve Kosofsky. Touching Feeling: Affect, Pedagogy, Performativity. Durham, NC: Duke University Press, 2003.Google Scholar
Sedgwick, Eve Kosofsky. The Weather in Proust. Ed. Goldberg, Jonathan. Durham, NC: Duke University Press, 2011.Google Scholar
Seel, Martin. “Letting Oneself Be Determined: A Revised Concept of Self-Determination.” Philosophical Romanticism. Ed. Kompridis, Nikolas. Abingdon and New York: Routledge, 2006. 81–96.Google Scholar
Shelley, Mary Wollstonecraft. Frankenstein; 1818 text. Ed. Butler, Marilyn. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1998.Google Scholar
Shelley, Percy Bysshe. Percy Bysshe Shelley: The Major Works. Ed. Leader, Zachary and O’Neill, Michael. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2003.Google Scholar
Siskin, Clifford. The Work of Writing: Literature and Social Change in Britain, 1700–1830. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press, 1998.Google Scholar
Slack, Paul. The Invention of Improvement: Information and Material Progress in Seventeenth-Century England. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2015.Google Scholar
Smith, Adam. The Theory of Moral Sentiments [1759]. Ed. Hanley, Ryan Patrick. New York: Penguin, 2010.Google Scholar
Soni, Vivasvan. Mourning Happiness: Narrative and the Politics of Modernity. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, 2010.Google Scholar
Stewart, Garrett. The Deed of Reading: Literature, Writing, Language, Philosophy. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, 2015.Google Scholar
Stewart, Garrett. The Value of Style in Fiction. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2018.Google Scholar
Stewart, Kathleen. Ordinary Affects. Durham, NC and London: Duke University Press, 2007.Google Scholar
Stout, Daniel M. Corporate Romanticism: Liberalism, Justice, and the Novel. New York: Fordham University Press, 2017.Google Scholar
Sutherland, Kathryn. Jane Austen’s Textual Lives: From Aeschylus to Bollywood. New York: Oxford University Press, 2005.Google Scholar
Swift, Jonathan. Gulliver’s Travels [1726]. Ed. Albert J., Rivero. New York: Norton, 2002.Google Scholar
Terada, Rei. “Philosophical Self-Denial: Wittgenstein and the Fear of Public Language.” Common Knowledge 8.3 (2002). 464–81.Google Scholar
Thomas, Keith. In Pursuit of Civility: Manners and Civilization in Early Modern England. Waltham, MA: Brandeis University Press, 2018.Google Scholar
Trilling, Lionel. The Moral Obligation to be Intelligent: Selected Essays. New York: Farrar, Straus and Giroux, 2000.Google Scholar
Trilling, Lionel. Sincerity and Authenticity: The Charles Eliot Norton Lectures, 1969–1970. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1971.Google Scholar
Vermeule, Blakey. Why Do We Care about Literary Characters. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press, 2010.Google Scholar
Walker, Eric C. “Austen and Cavell.” Stanley Cavell and the Event of Romanticism. Ed. Lindstrom, Eric. Romantic Circles Praxis Series (2014).Google Scholar
Warminski, Andrej. “Postscriptum: On the Super-performative.” Material Events: Paul de Man and the Afterlife of Theory. Ed. Cohen, Tom et. al. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press, 2002. 22–28.Google Scholar
Warner, William, and Lynch, Deidre. Eds. Cultural Institutions of the Novel. Durham, NC: Duke University Press, 1996.Google Scholar
Warren, Andrew. “Incapable of Being Disentangled: On De Quincey’s Impassioned Prose.” Romantic Circles Praxis Series (2017).Google Scholar
Williams, Raymond. Keywords: A Vocabulary of Culture and Society. Revised Ed. New York: Oxford University Press, 1985.Google Scholar
Wiltshire, John. “Medicine, Illness, and Disease.” Jane Austen in Context. Ed. Todd, Janet. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2005. 306–316.Google Scholar
Wimsatt, Jr. William Kurtz. The Prose Style of Samuel Johnson. New Haven: Yale University Press, 1941.Google Scholar
Wittgenstein, Ludwig. The Blue and Brown Books: Preliminary Studies for the “Philosophical Investigations.” New York: Harper & Row, 1958.Google Scholar
Wittgenstein, Ludwig. On Certainty. Ed. Anscombe, Gertrude Elizabeth Margaret and von Wright, Georg Henrik. Trans. Denis Paul and Gertrude Elizabeth Margaret Anscombe. Oxford: Blackwell, 1969.Google Scholar
Wolfson, Susan J. “Boxing Emma; or the Reader’s Dilemma at the Box Hill Games.” Re-reading Box Hill: Reading the Practice of Reading Everyday Life. Ed. Galperin, William. Romantic Circle Praxis Series (2000).Google Scholar
Wood, Michael. America in the Movies; or, “Santa Maria, It Had Slipped My Mind.” New York: Basic Books, 1979.Google Scholar
Wordsworth, William. William Wordsworth: The Major Works. Ed. Gill, Stephen. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2000.Google Scholar
Zhang, Dora. Strange Likeness: Description and the Modernist Novel. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2020.Google Scholar