Book contents
- Frontmatter
- Contents
- List of contributors
- Foreword by Paul F.A. Van Look
- Acknowledgements
- 1 Introduction and overview
- 2 Defining reproductive tract infections and other gynaecological morbidities
- 3 The social context of gynaecological morbidity: correlates, consequences and health seeking behaviour
- 4 Reproductive health: men's roles and men's rights
- 5 Study design for the measurement of gynaecological morbidity
- 6 Alternatives to community-based study designs for research on women's gynaecological morbidity
- 7 Community interaction in studies of gynaecological morbidity: experiences in Egypt, India and Uganda
- 8 Definitions of clinically diagnosed gynaecological morbidity resulting from reproductive tract infection
- 9 Laboratory tests for the detection of reproductive tract infections
- 10 Laboratory methods for the diagnosis of reproductive tract infections and selected conditions in population-based studies
- 11 The value of the imperfect: the contribution of interview surveys to the study of gynaecological ill health
- 12 Qualitative methods in gynaecological morbidity research
- 13 Integrating qualitative and quantitative methods in research on reproductive health
- 14 Interpreting results from different sources of data
- 15 Turning research into action
- Appendix A Notes on contributors
- Index
7 - Community interaction in studies of gynaecological morbidity: experiences in Egypt, India and Uganda
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 07 December 2009
- Frontmatter
- Contents
- List of contributors
- Foreword by Paul F.A. Van Look
- Acknowledgements
- 1 Introduction and overview
- 2 Defining reproductive tract infections and other gynaecological morbidities
- 3 The social context of gynaecological morbidity: correlates, consequences and health seeking behaviour
- 4 Reproductive health: men's roles and men's rights
- 5 Study design for the measurement of gynaecological morbidity
- 6 Alternatives to community-based study designs for research on women's gynaecological morbidity
- 7 Community interaction in studies of gynaecological morbidity: experiences in Egypt, India and Uganda
- 8 Definitions of clinically diagnosed gynaecological morbidity resulting from reproductive tract infection
- 9 Laboratory tests for the detection of reproductive tract infections
- 10 Laboratory methods for the diagnosis of reproductive tract infections and selected conditions in population-based studies
- 11 The value of the imperfect: the contribution of interview surveys to the study of gynaecological ill health
- 12 Qualitative methods in gynaecological morbidity research
- 13 Integrating qualitative and quantitative methods in research on reproductive health
- 14 Interpreting results from different sources of data
- 15 Turning research into action
- Appendix A Notes on contributors
- Index
Summary
A common element in virtually all investigations of women's gynaecological morbidity is the high level of interaction and rapport between investigators and the communities studied, irrespective of whether the study is conducted by a research group or a NGO. In this chapter we present lessons learned from the experiences of three studies in building community rapport and maximizing participation levels. Two of these were pioneer studies of women's gynaecological morbidity, conducted in the late 1980s in rural Egypt (Younis et al., 1993) and India (Bang et al., 1989). The third is a more recent and ongoing study of HIV and sexually transmitted infections (STIs), based in rural Rakai district, Uganda (Wawer et al., 1999).
The objectives of each of the three studies were largely similar: to assess levels of reproductive morbidity and, in the case of Rakai, STIs in community settings. Project sites were two villages each in Egypt and India, containing a total population of 16500 and 4000, respectively, and an entire district in Uganda comprising a population of 384000. Populations were largely poor and female literacy rates were uniformly low. Each of these studies have included a survey focusing on self reported symptoms, risk behaviours and background characteristics, as well as clinical examination (Egypt and India) and/or laboratory testing. While the Ugandan study required a minimum of pelvic examinations, they were a central component of both the Egypt and India studies
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- Investigating Reproductive Tract Infections and Other Gynaecological DisordersA Multidisciplinary Research Approach, pp. 140 - 185Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2003
- 3
- Cited by