Book contents
- Invading Ecological Networks
- Ecology, Biodiversity and Conservation
- Invading Ecological Networks
- Copyright page
- Epigraph
- Contents
- Preface
- Acknowledgements
- 1 Invasion Science 1.0
- 2 Relentless Evolution
- 3 Network Assembly
- 4 Regimes and Panarchy
- 5 Network Transitions
- 6 Network Scaling
- 7 Rethinking Invasibility
- Glossary
- Index
- Plate Section (PDF Only)
- References
1 - Invasion Science 1.0
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 05 May 2022
Book contents
- Invading Ecological Networks
- Ecology, Biodiversity and Conservation
- Invading Ecological Networks
- Copyright page
- Epigraph
- Contents
- Preface
- Acknowledgements
- 1 Invasion Science 1.0
- 2 Relentless Evolution
- 3 Network Assembly
- 4 Regimes and Panarchy
- 5 Network Transitions
- 6 Network Scaling
- 7 Rethinking Invasibility
- Glossary
- Index
- Plate Section (PDF Only)
- References
Summary
At the time of writing this book, we have witnessed an extreme case of biological invasion. A virus, through an evolutionary leap, has jumped onto a new host species, Homo sapiens, and has taken advantage of the new host’s ambitions and mobility in the zealous phase of globalisation, causing a worldwide pandemic and economic meltdown. The 2019 coronavirus outbreak (COVID-19) is a showcase of the core of invasion science. A list of questions spring to mind. Why this particular virus, and not others? Why now? How fast can it spread? How is its spread mediated by climatic and other environmental factors? What are its vectors and pathways of transmission? Which regions and populations are most susceptible? How much damage can it cause to public health and economies? What factors cause substantial variation in mortality between human populations in different countries? How can we control it? Can we forecast and prevent future outbreaks of emerging infectious diseases? While the whole world scrambles to make sense of COVID-19 and to combat the biggest crisis for humanity since World War II (WWII), we embark on a journey to address these questions to cover many more taxa and situations – the invasion of any biological organism into novel environments.
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- Invading Ecological Networks , pp. 1 - 49Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2022
References
Baker, HG (1955) Self-compatibility and establishment after ‘long-distance’ dispersal. Evolution 9, 347–349.Google Scholar
Baker, HG, Stebbins, GL (eds.) (1965) The Genetics of Colonizing Species. London: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Barrett, SCH (2015) Foundations of invasion genetics: the Baker and Stebbins legacy. Molecular Ecology 24, 1927–1941.Google Scholar
Bertelsmeier, C, et al. (2018) Recurrent bridgehead effects accelerate global alien ant spread. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences USA 115, 5486–5491.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Berthouly-Salazar, C, et al. (2012) Spatial sorting drives morphological variation in the invasive bird, Acridotheris tristis. PLoS ONE 7, e38145.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Blackburn, TM, et al. (2011) A proposed unified framework for biological invasions. Trends in Ecology & Evolution 26, 333–339.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Carr, AN, et al. (2019) Long‐term propagule pressure overwhelms initial community determination of invader success. Ecosphere 10, e02826.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cassey, P, et al. (2018) Dissecting the null model for biological invasions: a meta-analysis of the propagule pressure effect. PLoS Biology 16, e2005987.Google Scholar
Caswell, H (2019) Sensitivity Analysis: Matrix Methods in Demography and Ecology. Cham: Springer.Google Scholar
Catford, JA, et al. (2009) Reducing redundancy in invasion ecology by integrating hypotheses into a single theoretical framework. Diversity and Distributions 15, 22–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chase, JM, et al. (2018) Embracing scale‐dependence to achieve a deeper understanding of biodiversity and its change across communities. Ecology Letters 21, 1737–1751.Google Scholar
Cheptou, PO, Massol, F (2009) Pollination fluctuations drive evolutionary syndromes linking dispersal and mating system. The American Naturalist 174, 46–55.Google Scholar
Clark, JS, et al. (1998) Reid’s paradox of rapid plant migration: Dispersal theory and interpretation of paleoecological records. BioScience 48, 13–24.Google Scholar
Clout, MN, Williams, PA (2009) Invasive Species Management: A Handbook of Principles and Techniques. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Colautti, RI, et al. (2017) Invasions and extinctions through the looking glass of evolutionary ecology. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences 372, 20160031.Google Scholar
Darwin, CR (1839) The Voyage of the Beagle: Journal of Researches into the Geology and Natural History of the Various Countries visited by HMS Beagle. London: Henry Colburn.Google Scholar
Davidson, AM, et al. (2011) Do invasive species show higher phenotypic plasticity than native species and, if so, is it adaptive? A meta‐analysis. Ecology Letters 14, 419–431.Google Scholar
Davis, MB, Shaw, RG (2001) Range shifts and adaptive responses to quaternary climate change. Science 292, 673–679.Google Scholar
Díaz, S, et al. (2015) A Rosetta stone for nature’s benefits to people. PLoS Biology 13, e1002040.Google Scholar
Divíšek, J, et al. (2018) Similarity of introduced plant species to native ones facilitates naturalization, but differences enhance invasion success. Nature Communications 9, 4631.Google Scholar
Dlugosch, KM, Parker, IM (2008) Founding events in species invasions: Genetic variation, adaptive evolution, and the role of multiple introductions. Molecular Ecology 17, 431–449.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Drake, JA, et al. (1989) Biological Invasions: A Global Perspective. Chichester: John Wiley.Google Scholar
Einstein, A (1905) Über die von der molekularkinetischen Theorie der Wärme geforderte Bewegung von in ruhenden Flüssigkeiten suspendierten Teilchen. Annalen der Physik 322, 549–560.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Enders, M, et al. (2020) A conceptual map of invasion biology: Integrating hypotheses into a consensus network. Global Ecology and Biogeography 29, 978–991.Google Scholar
Essl, F. et al. (2015a) Historical legacies accumulate to shape future biodiversity change. Diversity and Distributions 21, 534–547.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Essl, F, et al. (2015b) Crossing frontiers in tackling pathways of biological invasions. BioScience 65, 769–782.Google Scholar
Essl, F, et al. (2020) Drivers of future alien species impacts: An expert-based assessment, Global Change Biology 26, 4880–4893.Google Scholar
Fisher, RA (1937) The wave of advance of advantageous genes. Annals of Eugenics 7, 355–369.Google Scholar
Fredholm, I (1903) Sur une classe d’équations fonctionnelles. Acta Mathematica 27, 365–390.Google Scholar
Funk, JL, et al. (2016) Plant functional traits of dominant native and invasive species in Mediterranean‐climate ecosystems. Ecology 97, 75–78.Google Scholar
Gaertner, M, et al. (2009) Impacts of alien plant invasions on species richness in Mediterranean-type ecosystems: A meta-analysis. Progress in Physical Geography 33, 319–338.Google Scholar
Gurevitch, J, et al. (2011) Emergent insights from the synthesis of conceptual frameworks for biological invasions. Ecology Letters 14, 407–418.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gurevitch, J, et al. (2016) Landscape demography: Population change and its drivers across spatial scales. The Quarterly Review of Biology 91, 459–485.Google Scholar
Hayes, KR, Barry, SC (2008) Are there any consistent predictors of invasion success? Biological Invasions 10, 483–506.Google Scholar
Hobbs, RJ, Richardson, DM (2010) Invasion ecology and restoration ecology: Parallel evolution in two fields of endeavour. In Richardson, DM (ed.), Fifty Years of Invasion Ecology, pp. 61–69. Oxford: Blackwell Publishing Ltd.Google Scholar
Hui, C, Li, Z (2006) Distribution patterns of metapopulation determined by Allee effects. Population Ecology 46, 55–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hui, C, Richardson, DM (2019) Network invasion as an open dynamical system: Pesponse to Rossberg and Barabás. Trends in Ecology & Evolution 34, 386–387.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hui, C, et al. (2011a) Macroecology meets invasion ecology: Linking the native distributions of Australian acacias to invasiveness. Diversity and Distributions 17, 872–883.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hui, C, et al. (2011b) Modelling spread in invasion ecology: A synthesis. In Richardson, DM (ed.) Fifty Years of Invasion Ecology: The Legacy of Charles Elton, pp. 329–343. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell.Google Scholar
Hui, C, et al. (2012) Flexible dispersal strategies in native and non-native ranges: Environmental quality and the ‘good-stay bad-disperse’ rule. Ecography 35, 1024–1032.Google Scholar
Hui, C, et al. (2014) Macroecology meets invasion ecology: Performance of Australian acacias and eucalypts around the world foretold by features of their native ranges. Biological Invasions 16, 565–576.Google Scholar
Hui, C, et al. (2017) Scale-dependent portfolio effects explain growth inflation and volatility reduction in landscape demography. Proceedings of National Academy of Sciences USA 114, 12507–12511.Google Scholar
Hulme, PE (2015) Invasion pathways at a crossroad: Policy and research challenges for managing alien species introductions. Journal of Applied Ecology 52, 1418–1424.Google Scholar
Hulme, PE, et al. (2008) Grasping at the routes of biological invasions: A framework for integrating pathways into policy. Journal of Applied Ecology 45, 403–414.Google Scholar
Keitt, TH, et al. (2001) Allee effects, invasion pinning, and species’ borders. The American Naturalist 157, 203–216.Google Scholar
Khatri, P, et al. (2012) Ten years of pathway analysis: Current approaches and outstanding challenges, PLoS Computational Biology 8, e1002375.Google Scholar
Kot, M, et al. (1996) Dispersal data and the spread of invading organisms. Ecology 77, 2027–2042.Google Scholar
Kowarik, I, Pyšek, P (2012) The first steps towards unifying concepts in invasion ecology were made one hundred years ago: Revisiting the work of the Swiss botanist Albert Thellung. Diversity and Distributions 18, 1243–1252.Google Scholar
Le Roux, JL, et al. (2019) Recent anthropogenic plant extinctions differ in biodiversity hotspots and coldspots. Current Biology 29, 2912–2918.Google Scholar
Lima, M (2015) A visual history of human knowledge. TED Talk. www.ted.com/talks/manuel_lima_a_visual_history_of_human_knowledgeGoogle Scholar
Lockwood, JL, et al. (2005) The role of propagule pressure in explaining species invasions. Trends in Ecology & Evolution 20, 223–228.Google Scholar
Mascaro, J et al. (2013) Origins of the novel ecosystem concept. In Hobbs, RJ, Higgs, EC, Hall, CM (eds.) Novel Ecosystems: Intervening in the New Ecological World Order, pp. 45–57. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell.Google Scholar
Mathakutha, R, et al. (2019) Invasive species differ in key functional traits from native and non‐invasive alien plant species. Journal of Vegetation Science 30, 994–1006.Google Scholar
McGeoch, MA, et al. (2016) Prioritizing species, pathways, and sites to achieve conservation targets for biological invasion. Biological Invasions 18, 299–314.Google Scholar
McGraw, JB, Furedi, MA (2005) Deer browsing and population viability of a forest understory plant. Science 307, 920–922.Google Scholar
Melbourne, BA, Hastings, A (2012) Extinction risk depends strongly on factors contributing to stochasticity. Nature 454, 100–103.Google Scholar
Mooney, HA (1998) The Globalization of Ecological Thought: Excellence in Ecology 5. Oldendorf/Luhe: Ecology Institute.Google Scholar
Mooney, HA (1999) The global invasive species program (GISP). Biological Invasions 1, 97–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mooney, HA, et al. (eds.) (2005) Invasive Alien Species: A New Synthesis. Washington: Island Press.Google Scholar
Muñoz, MA (2018) Criticality and dynamical scaling in living systems. Reviews of Modern Physics 90, 031001.Google Scholar
Novoa, A, et al. (2020) Invasion syndromes: A systematic approach for predicting biological invasions and facilitating effective management. Biological Invasions 22, 1801–1820.Google Scholar
Okubo, A (1980) Diffusion and Ecological Problems: Mathematical Models. New York: Springer-Verlag.Google Scholar
Phair, DJ, et al. (2018) Context-dependent spatial sorting of dispersal-related traits in the invasive starlings (Sturnus vulgaris) of South Africa and Australia. BioRxiv, 342451.Google Scholar
Pheloung, PC, et al. (1999) A weed risk assessment model for use as a biosecurity tool evaluating plant introductions. Journal of Environmental Management 57, 239–251.Google Scholar
Phillips, B, et al. (2006) Invasion and the evolution of speed in toads. Nature 439, 803.Google Scholar
Prentis, PJ, et al. (2008) Adaptive evolution in invasive species. Trends in Plant Science 13, 288–294.Google Scholar
Pyšek, P, et al. (2011) Alien plants introduced by different pathways differ in invasion success: Unintentional introductions as a threat to natural areas. PLoS ONE 6, e24890.Google Scholar
Pyšek, P, et al. (2012) A global assessment of invasive plant impacts on resident species, communities and ecosystems: The interaction of impact measures, invading species’ traits and environment, Global Change Biology 18, 1725–1737.Google Scholar
Pyšek, P, et al. (2020a) Scientists’ warning on invasive alien species. Biological Reviews 95, 1511–1534.Google Scholar
Pyšek, P, et al. (2020b) Framework for Invasive Aliens (MAFIA): Disentangling large-scale context dependency in biological invasions. NeoBiota 62, 407–461.Google Scholar
Ramanantoanina, A, et al. (2014) Spatial assortment of mixed propagules explains the acceleration of range expansion. PLoS ONE 9, e103409.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Richardson, DM (2011) Invasion science: The roads travelled and the roads ahead. In Richardson, DM (ed.) Fifty Years of Invasion Ecology: The Legacy of Charles Elton, pp. 397–407. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell.Google Scholar
Richardson, DM, Pyšek, P (2007) Classics in physical geography revisited: Elton, C.S. 1958: The ecology of invasions by animals and plants. Methuen: London. Progress in Physical Geography 31, 659–666.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Richardson, DM, Pyšek, P (2008) Fifty years of invasion ecology: The legacy of Charles Elton. Diversity and Distributions 14, 161–168.Google Scholar
Richardson, DM, et al. (2000) Naturalization and invasion of alien plants: Concepts and definitions. Diversity and Distributions 6, 93–107.Google Scholar
Richardson, DM, et al. (2011) A compendium of essential concepts and terminology in invasion ecology. In Richardson, DM (ed.) Fifty Years of Invasion Ecology: The Legacy of Charles Elton, pp. 409–420. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell.Google Scholar
Rodger, JG, et al. (2018) Heterogeneity in local density allows a positive evolutionary relationship between self‐fertilisation and dispersal. Evolution 72, 1784–1800.Google Scholar
Sandlund, OT, et al. (1999) Introduction: The many aspects of the invasive alien species problem. In Sandlund, OT, Schei, PJ, Viken, Å (eds.) Invasive Species and Biodiversity Management, pp. 1–7. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.Google Scholar
Schittko, C, et al. (2020) A multidimensional framework for measuring biotic novelty: How novel is a community? Global Change Biology 26, 4401–4417.Google Scholar
Seebens, H, et al. (2017) No saturation in the accumulation of alien species worldwide. Nature Communications 8, 14435.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Shigesada, N, et al. (1995) Modeling stratified diffusion in biological invasions. The American Naturalist 146, 229–251.Google Scholar
Shine, R, et al. (2011) An evolutionary process that assembles phenotypes through space rather than through time. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences USA 108, 5708–5711.Google Scholar
Simberloff, D (2009) The role of propagule pressure in biological invasions. Annual Review of Ecology, Evolution, and Systematics 40, 81–102.Google Scholar
Simberloff, D (2011) SCOPE Project. In Simberloff, D, Rejmánek, M (eds.) Encyclopedia of Biological Invasions, pp. 617–619. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Skellam, JG (1951) Random dispersal in theoretical populations, Biometrika 38, 196–218.Google Scholar
Stott, I, et al. (2011) A framework for studying transient dynamics of population projection matrix models. Ecology Letters 14, 959–970.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Suarez, AV, et al. (2001) Patterns of spread in biological invasions dominated by long-distance jump dispersal: Insights from Argentine ants. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences USA 98, 1095–1100.Google Scholar
Van den Bosch, F, et al. (1992) Analysing the velocity of animal range expansion. Journal of Biogeography 19, 135–150.Google Scholar
Van Kleunen, M, et al. (2010a), Are invaders different? A conceptual framework of comparative approaches for assessing determinants of invasiveness. Ecology Letters 13, 947–958.Google Scholar
Van Kleunen, M, Weber, E, Fischer, M (2010b) A meta‐analysis of trait differences between invasive and non‐invasive plant species. Ecology Letters 13, 235–245.Google Scholar
Vaz, AS, et al. (2017) The progress of interdisciplinarity in invasion science. Ambio 46, 428–442.Google Scholar
Whitney, KD, Gabler, CA (2008) Rapid evolution in introduced species, ‘invasive traits’ and recipient communities: Challenges for predicting invasive potential. Diversity and Distributions 14, 569–580.Google Scholar
Wilkinson, DM (2002) Ecology before ecology: Biogeography and ecology in Lyell’s ‘Principles’. Journal of Biogeography 29, 1109–1115.Google Scholar
Wilson, JRU, Panetta, FD, Lindgren, C (eds.) (2017) Detecting and Responding to Alien Plant Incursions. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Wilson, JRU, et al. (2009) Something in the way you move: Dispersal pathways affect invasion success. Trends in Ecology & Evolution 24, 136–144.Google Scholar
Wilson, JRU, et al. (2020a) Frameworks used in invasion science: progress and prospects. NeoBiota 62, 1–30.Google Scholar
Wilson, JRU, et al. (2020b) Is invasion science moving towards agreed standards? The influence of selected frameworks. NeoBiota 62, 569–590.Google Scholar
Woodford, DJ, et al. (2016) Confronting the wicked problem of managing invasive species. NeoBiota 31, 63–86.Google Scholar