Book contents
- Frontmatter
- Contents
- List of figures
- Preface
- List of copyright permissions
- List of abbreviations
- Chapter 1 What is language typology?
- Chapter 2 The worlds of words
- Chapter 3 Assembling words
- Chapter 4 Dissembling words
- Chapter 5 The sounds of languages
- Chapter 6 Language in flux
- Chapter 7 Explaining crosslinguistic preferences
- List of languages mentioned
- Glossary
- References
- Subject index
- Language index
- Author index
Chapter 2 - The worlds of words
Lexical typology
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 05 February 2013
- Frontmatter
- Contents
- List of figures
- Preface
- List of copyright permissions
- List of abbreviations
- Chapter 1 What is language typology?
- Chapter 2 The worlds of words
- Chapter 3 Assembling words
- Chapter 4 Dissembling words
- Chapter 5 The sounds of languages
- Chapter 6 Language in flux
- Chapter 7 Explaining crosslinguistic preferences
- List of languages mentioned
- Glossary
- References
- Subject index
- Language index
- Author index
Summary
Chapter outline
What do languages have words for? We will consider similarities and differences in vocabulary among languages in six semantic fields: body parts, kinship terms, personal pronouns, numerals, antonymic adjectives, and color words.
Summary generalizations will be presented about markedness relations and about the relationship between words and thoughts.
Introduction
Suppose you were to design a language that is easy to speak and understand. What would the words be like? Here are two features of what seems to be an ideal vocabulary.
(i) There is a word for everything.
(ii) From the way a word sounds, it is easy to tell what it means.
Let us see if these characteristics hold for English.
(A) WORDS FOR EVERYTHING?
Back in the 1980s, comedian and actor Rich Hall provided abundant evidence to show that English did not have words for everything. In his TV program and in his books (e.g. Hall 1984 ), he entertained his audience with “sniglets,” which he defined as “any word that does not appear in the dictionary but should.” Here are some of these tongue-in-cheek creations, proposed by either Hall himself and by other people who subsequently picked up on the idea.
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- Introducing Language Typology , pp. 25 - 64Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2012