Aarts, B. (1992). Small Clauses in English: The Nonverbal Types. Berlin and New York: Mouton de Gruyter.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Aarts, B. and Haegeman, L. (2006). English word classes and phrases. In Aarts, B. and McMahon, A. (eds.), The Handbook of English Linguistics (pp. 117–45). Malden, MA: Blackwell Publishers.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Aitchison, J. (1991). Language Change: Progress or Decay? 2nd edn. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Altenberg, B. (1990). Predicting text segmentation into tone units. In Svartvik, J. (ed.), The London-Lund Corpus of Spoken English: Description and Research (pp. 275–86). Lund: Lund University Press.Google Scholar

Andersen, G. (2001). Pragmatic Markers and Sociolinguistic Variation. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Ashby, M. and Maidment, J. (2005). Introducing Phonetic Science. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Austin, J. L. (1962). How to do Things with Words. Oxford: Clarendon.Google Scholar

Bailyn, J. F. (2003). Does Russian scrambling exist? In Karimi, S. (ed.), Word Order and Scrambling (pp. 156–76). Malden, MA: Blackwell.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Baldi, P. (1990). Indo-European languages. In Comrie, B. (ed.), The World's Major Languages (pp. 31–67). New York: Oxford.Google Scholar

Béjoint, H. (2000). Modern Lexicography: An Introduction. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Bell, A. (1984). Language style as audience design. Language in Society, 13: 145–204.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Biber, D. (1988). Variation Across Speech and Writing. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Biber, D., Johansson, S., Leech, G., Conrad, S., and Finegan, E. (1999). Longman Grammar of Spoken and Written English. Harlow, England: Pearson Education Limited.Google Scholar

Blake, N. (1992). The literary language. In Blake, N. (ed.), The English Language, VoI. II: 1066–1476 (pp. 500–41). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Bolinger, D. (1977). Meaning and Form. London: Longman.Google Scholar

Brown, P. and Levinson, S. C. (1987). Politeness: Some Universals in Language Usage. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Cameron, D. (1995). Verbal Hygiene. London: Routledge.Google Scholar

Carter, R. and Cornbleet, S. (2001). The Language of Speech and Writing. London: Routledge.Google Scholar

Chambers, J. K. (2003). Sociolinguistic Theory, 2nd edn. Oxford and Malden, MA: Blackwell Publishers.Google Scholar

Chomsky, N. (1957). Syntactic Structures. The Hague: Mouton. (Reprinted in 2002 by Walter de Gruyter, Inc.)Google Scholar

Chomsky, N. (1959). A review of B. F. Skinner's verbal behavior. Language, 35: 26–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Clemetson, L. (2007). The racial politics of speaking well. New York Times. February 4. Section 4, pp. 1 and 4.Google Scholar

Comrie, B. (1989). Language Typology and Language Universals, 2nd edn. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar

Comrie, B. (1990). Russian. In Comrie, B. (ed.), The World's Major Languages (pp. 329–47). New York: Oxford.Google Scholar

Croft, W. (2000). Explaining Language Change: An Evolutionary Approach. Harlow, England: Longman.Google Scholar

Croft, W. and Cruse, D. (2004). Cognitive Linguistics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Cruse, D. (1986). Lexical Semantics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Cruse, D. (2004). Meaning in Language: An Introduction to Semantics and Pragmatics, 2nd edn. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Crystal, D. (2000). Language Death. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Crystal, D. (2003). English as a Global Language, 2nd edn. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Daneš, F. (ed.) (1974). Papers on Functional Sentence Perspective. Prague: Academia.

D'Arcy, A. (2007). Like and language ideology: Disentangling fact from fiction. American Speech, 28(4): 386–419.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

A Dictionary of Prefixes, Suffixes, and Combining Forms (2002). Taken from Webster's Third New International Dictionary, Unabridged. Springfield, MA: Merriam Webster's. www.spellingbee.com/pre_suf_comb.pdf (accessed March 17, 2008).

Dijk, T. A. (1988). News as Discourse. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar

Dijk, T. A. and Kintsch, W.. (1983). Strategies of Discourse Comprehension. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar

Dixon, R. M. W. (1997). The Rise and Fall of Languages. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Dresher, B. E. and Lahiri, A. (2005). Main stress left in Early Middle English. In Fortescue, M.et al. (eds.), Historical Linguistics: Selected Papers from the 16th International Conference on Historical Linguistics (pp. 75–85). Amsterdam and Philadelphia: Benjamins.Google Scholar

Dyson, E. D. (2005). Is Bill Cosby Right?: Or Has the Black Middle Class Lost Its Mind?New York: Basic Civitas Books.Google Scholar

Edmonds, P. and Hirst, G. (2002). Near-synonymy and lexical choice. Computational Linguistics, 28(2): 105–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Fellbaum, C. (1998). Introduction. In Fellbaum, C. (ed.), Wordnet: An Electronic Lexical Database. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar

Fillmore, C. (1996). The pragmatics of constructions. In Slobin, D.et al. (eds.), Social Interaction, Social Context, and Language: Essays in Honor of Susan Ervin-Tripp (pp. 53–70). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar

Firbas, J. (1992). Functional Sentence Perspective in Written and Spoken Communication. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Fish, Stanley (2005). Interview. On the Media. 22 July 2005. Transcript available at: onthemedia.org/transcripts/transcripts_072205_open.html (accessed June 22, 2008).

Fournier, J.-M. (2007). From a Latin syllable-driven stress system to a Romance versus Germanic morphology-driven system: in honour of Lionel Guierre. Language Sciences, 29: 218–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Francis, N. (1992). Language corpora B. C. In Svartvik, J. (ed.), Directions in Corpus Linguistics (pp. 17–32). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar

Frawley, W. (1992). Linguistic Semantics. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar

Gilliver, P. (2000). Appendix II: OED personalia. In Mugglestone, L. (ed.), Lexicography and the OED: Pioneers in the Untrodden Forest (pp. 232–52). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Gimbutas, M. (1956). The Prehistory of Europe. Part I: Mesolithic, Neolithic, and Copper Age Cultures in Russia and the Baltic Area. American School of Prehistoric Research, Harvard University Bulletin No. 20. Cambridge, MA: Peabody Museum.Google Scholar

Gordon, R. G. (ed.) (2005). Ethnologue: Languages of the World, 15th edn. Dallas, TX: SIL International. (Electronic version: www.ethnologue.com, accessed June 22, 2008)

Greenberg, J. H. (2000). Indo-European and its Closest Relatives: The Eurasiatic Language Family. Vol. I: Grammar; Vol. II: Lexicon. Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar

Grice, H. P. (1989). Studies in the Way of Words. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar

Hake, R. and Williams, J. (1981). Style and its consequences: Do as I do, not as I say. College English, 43.5: 33–451.Google Scholar

Hall, J. H. (2004). The dictionary of American regional English. In Finegan, E. and Rickford, J. R. (eds.), Language in the USA (pp. 92–112). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Halliday, M. A. K. (1994). An Introduction to Functional Grammar, 2nd edn. London: Edward Arnold.Google Scholar

Halliday, M. A. K. and Hasan, R. (1976). Cohesion in English. London: Longman.Google Scholar

Halliday, M. A. K. and Hasan, R. (1985). Language, Context, and Text: Aspects of Language in a Social-Semiotic Perspective. Victoria, Australia: Deakin University Press.Google Scholar

Halliday, M. A. K. and Matthiessen, C. (2004). An Introduction to Functional Grammar, 3rd edn. London: Hodder Education.Google Scholar

Hammond, M. (1999). The Phonology of English. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Handbook of the International Phonetic Association (1999). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Hewlett, N. and Beck, J. M. (2006). An Introduction to the Science of Phonetics. Oxford and New York: Routledge.Google Scholar

Hogg, R. (2003). An Introduction to Old English. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Huddleston, R. and Pullum, G. (2002). The Cambridge Grammar of the English Language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hull, D. L. (1988). Science as a Process: An Evolutionary Account of the Social and Conceptual Development of Science. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hymes, D. (1971). On Communicative Competence. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.Google Scholar

Jones, S. (2002). Antonymy: A Corpus-Based Perspective. London: Routledge.Google Scholar

Kay, C. J. (2000). Historical semantics and historical lexicography: will the twain ever meet? In Coleman, J. and Kay, C. (eds.), Lexicology, Semantics and Lexicography in English Historical Linguistics: Selected Papers from the Fourth G.L. Brook Symposium (pp. 53–68). Amsterdam: Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kintsch, W. (1998). Comprehension: A Paradigm for Cognition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Kirkman, A. J. (1992). Good Style: Writing for Science and Technology. Oxford: Taylor and Francis.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kornfilt, J. (1990). Turkish and the Turkic languages. In Comrie, B. (ed.), The World's Major Languages (pp. 619–44). New York: Oxford.Google Scholar

Labov, W. (1972). The stratification of (r) in New York City department stores. In Labov, W. (ed.), Sociolinguistic Patterns (pp. 43–70). Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.Google Scholar

Labov, W. (1973). The boundaries of words and their meanings. In Bailey, C. J. and Shuy, R. (eds.), New Ways of Analyzing Variation in English (pp. 340–73). Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.Google Scholar

Labov, W. (1994). Principles of Linguistic Change: Internal Factors. Malden, MA: Blackwell.Google Scholar

Ladefoged, P. (2001). A Course in Phonetics, 4th edn. Fort Worth, TX: Harcourt.Google Scholar

Ladefoged, P. (2005). Vowels and Consonants, 2nd edn. Oxford and Malden, MA: Blackwell.Google Scholar

Landau, S. (2001). Dictionaries: The Art and Craft of Lexicography, 2nd edn. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Lee, D. (2001). Genres, registers, text types, domains, and styles: Clarifying the concepts and navigating a path through the BNC jungle. Language Learning & Technology, 5.3: 37–72.Google Scholar

Leech, G. (1981). Semantics, 2nd edn. Harmondsworth, England: Penguin.Google Scholar

Leech, G. (1983). Principles of Pragmatics. London: Longman.Google Scholar

Lyons, J. (1977). Semantics, Vol. I. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Malmkjær, K. (2005). Linguistics and the Language of Translation. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.Google Scholar

Matthews, P. H. (1981). Syntax. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Matthews, P. H. (1991). Morphology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

McArthur, T. (ed.) (1992). The Oxford Companion to the English Language. Oxford and New York: Oxford University Press.

Meyer, C. F. (2003). The Lexis/Nexis database as historical corpus. Paper presented at the 24th annual conference of the International Computer Archive of Modern English, Guernsey, British Isles.

Milligan, S. (2007). Democratic contenders unite against Bush. Boston Globe. 27 April: A1.Google Scholar

Milroy, J. and Gordon, M. (2003). Sociolinguistics: Method and Interpretation. Malden, MA: Blackwell Publishers.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Milroy, J. and Milroy, L. (1997). Varieties and variation. In Coulmas, F. (ed.), The Handbook of Sociolinguistics (pp. 47–64). Oxford and Malden, MA: Blackwell Publishers.Google Scholar

Moon, R. (2007). Sinclair, lexicography, and the Cobuild project: The application of theory. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics, 12: 159–81.Google Scholar

Murphy, M. (2003). Semantic Relations and the Lexicon: Antonymy, Synonymy and Other Paradigms. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Murray, J. A. H. (ed.) (1971). The Compact Edition of the Oxford English Dictionary. London: Oxford University Press.

Nelson, G. (1996). The design of the corpus. In Greenbaum, S. (ed.), Comparing English Worldwide: the International Corpus of English (pp. 27–35). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Nelson, G. (2002). International Corpus of English: Markup manual for spoken texts. www.ucl.ac.uk/englishusage/ice/spoken.pdf (accessed March 26, 2007)

Nunberg, G. (2004). Going Nucular: Language, Politics, and Culture in Confrontational Times. New York: Public Affairs Books.Google Scholar

Olson, S. (2003). Mapping Human History: Genes, Race, and Our Common Origins. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.Google Scholar

Paradis, C. and Willners, C. (2006). Selecting antonyms for dictionary entries: Methodological aspects. In Heinat, F., Klingvall, E., and Manninen, S. (eds.), The Department of English: Working Papers in English Linguistics, Vol. VI. www.englund.lu.se/images/stories/pdf-files/workingspapers/vol06/Paradis_Willners_06.pdf (accessed June 22, 2008).Google Scholar

Pelsmaekers, K. (1999). Directness and (im)politeness: the use of imperatives in business letters. In Tops, G. A. J., Devriendt, B., and Geukens, S. (eds.), Thinking English Grammar (pp. 263–79). Leuven/Louvain, Belgium: Peeters Publishers.Google Scholar

Plag, I. (2003). Word-Formation in English. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Quirk, R., Greenbaum, S., Leech, G., and Svartvik, J. (1985). A Comprehensive Grammar of the English Language. London: Longman.Google Scholar

Renfrew, C. (1987). Archaeology and Language. London: Jonathan Cape.Google Scholar

Renfrew, C. (2000). At the edge of knowability: Towards a prehistory of languages. Cambridge Archaeological Journal, 10.1: 7–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Rickford, J. (2004). Spoken soul: The beloved, belittled language of Black America. In Fought, C. (ed.), Sociolinguistic Variation: Critical Reflections (pp. 198–208). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Sacks, H., Schegloff, E. A., and Jefferson, G.. (1974). A simplest systematics for the organization of turntaking for conversation. Language, 50: 696–735.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Saussure, F. de.Course in General Linguistics. [1916] Repr. 1983 ed. Bally, C. and Sechehaye, A., trans. Harris, R.. La Salle, IL: Open Court.Google Scholar

Schegloff, E. A. (2002). Opening sequencing. In Katz, J. E. and Aakhus, M. (eds.), Perpetual Contact: Mobile Communication, Private Talk, Public Performance (pp. 326–85). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Schiffrin, D., Tannen, D., and Hamilton, H. E. (2003). The Handbook of Discourse Analysis. Oxford and Malden, MA: Blackwell.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Schneider, E. (2003). The dynamics of New Englishes: From identity construction to dialect birth. Language, 12: 233–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Searle, J. (1969). Speech Acts: An Essay in the Philosophy of Language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Searle, J. (1979). Expression and Meaning. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Simon, J. (1981). Paradigm's Lost. New York: Viking.Google Scholar

Sinclair, J. (1991). Corpus, Concordance, Collocation. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Sparck Jones, K. (1986). Synonymy and Semantic Classification. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.Google Scholar

Sperber, D. and Wilson, D. (1995). Relevance: Communication and Cognition, 2nd edn. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar

Stockwell, R. P. and Minkova, D. (2001). English Words: History and Structure. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Svensson, A. M. and Hering, J. (2005). Germanic prosody and French loanwords. Moderna Språk, 99: 122–8.Google Scholar

Tannen, D. (2001). You Just Don't Understand: Women and Men in Conversation. New York: Quill.Google Scholar

Tao, H. (2003). Turn initiators in spoken English. In Leistyna, P. and Meyer, C. F. (eds.), Corpus Analysis: Language Structure and Language Use (pp. 187–207). Amsterdam: Rodopi.Google Scholar

Thomas, J. (1995). Meaning in Interaction. Harlow, Essex: Longman.Google Scholar

Thomason, S. G. and Kaufman, T. (1988). Language Contact, Creolization, and Genetic Linguistics. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar

Titscher, S., Meyer, M., Wodak, R., and Vetter, E. (2000). Methods of Text and Discourse Analysis. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar

Tomlin, R. (1986). Basic Word Order: Functional Principles. London: Croom Helm.Google Scholar

Trask, R. L. (1996). Historical Linguistics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Watkins, C. (2000). Indo-European and the Indo-Europeans. In American Heritage Dictionary of the English Language, 4th edn. Boston: Houghton Mifflin. (Electronic version: www.bartleby.com/61/8.html, accessed June 21, 2008).Google Scholar

Watts, R. J. (2003). Politeness. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Whaley, L. (1997). Introduction to Typology: The Unity and Diversity of Language. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Wierzbicka, A. (1996). Semantics: Primes and Universals. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Wierzbicka, A. (2006). English: Meaning and Culture. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Wilson, D. and Sperber, D. (2006). Relevance theory. In Ward, G. L. and Horn, L. A. (eds.), The Handbook of Pragmatics, 2nd edn. (pp. 607–32). Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar

Wright, L. (2000). Introduction. In Wright, L. (ed.), The Development of Standard English: 1300–1800 (pp. 1–8). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Yavas, M. S. (2005). Applied English Phonology. Oxford and Medford, MA: Blackwell.Google Scholar

Zipf, G. K. (1932). Selected Studies of the Principle of Relative Frequency in Language. Cambridge, MA: Harvard.CrossRefGoogle Scholar