Book contents
- Intertextuality in Pliny’s Epistles
- Intertextuality in Pliny’s Epistles
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Contributors
- Acknowledgements
- Abbreviations
- Introduction
- Part I Intertextuality and Interdiscursivity in Pliny’s Letters
- Part II Models and Anti-Models: Pliny’s Interaction with Oratory and Natural History
- Part III Pliny and Seneca: Discourses of Grief and Posthumous Reputation
- Part IV Pliny’s Villas and Their Poetic Models
- Part V Pliny Turns Nasty: Satire and the Scoptic Tradition
- Part VI Final Thoughts: Discourses of Representation and Reproduction
- Bibliography
- General Subject Index
- Index Locorum
- References
Bibliography
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 07 September 2023
Book contents
- Intertextuality in Pliny’s Epistles
- Intertextuality in Pliny’s Epistles
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Contributors
- Acknowledgements
- Abbreviations
- Introduction
- Part I Intertextuality and Interdiscursivity in Pliny’s Letters
- Part II Models and Anti-Models: Pliny’s Interaction with Oratory and Natural History
- Part III Pliny and Seneca: Discourses of Grief and Posthumous Reputation
- Part IV Pliny’s Villas and Their Poetic Models
- Part V Pliny Turns Nasty: Satire and the Scoptic Tradition
- Part VI Final Thoughts: Discourses of Representation and Reproduction
- Bibliography
- General Subject Index
- Index Locorum
- References
Summary
A summary is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- Intertextuality in Pliny's Epistles , pp. 304 - 330Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2023
References
Ando, C. (2015). Roman Social Imaginaries: Language and Thought in the Contexts of Empire, Toronto.Google Scholar
André, J.-M. (1975). ‘Pensée et philosophie dans des Lettres de Pline le Jeune’, REL 53: 225–47.Google Scholar
André, J.-M., (1979). ‘Philosophie und Denken bei Plinius dem Jüngeren’, Acta Philologica Aenipontana 4: 25–26.Google Scholar
Ash, R. (2003). ‘Aliud enim est epistulam, aliud historiam … scribere (Ep. 6.16.22). Pliny the Historian?’, in Morello and Gibson (2003): 211–25.Google Scholar
Ash, R., (2013). ‘Drip-feed Invective: Pliny, Self-Fashioning, and the Regulus Letters’, in Marmodoro, A. and Hill, J. (eds.). The Author’s Voice in Classical and Late Antiquity. Oxford: 207–32.Google Scholar
Ash, R., (2018). ‘Paradoxography and Marvels in Post-Domitianic Literature: “An Extraordinary Affair, Even in the Hearing!”’, in König, and Whitton, (2018b): 126–45.Google Scholar
Aubrion, É. (1975). ‘Pline le Jeune et la rhétorique de l’affirmation’, Latomus 34: 90–130.Google Scholar
Aubrion, É., (1989). ‘La Correspondance de Pline le Jeune: Problèmes et orientations actuelles de la recherche’, ANRW II 33.1: 304–74.Google Scholar
Audano, S. (2018). ‘La statua, la virtù e la memoria del principe: variazioni di un topos tra Cassio Dione (lxxiv [lxxiii] 14, 2a) e Plinio il Giovane (Pan. 55)’, Sileno 44: 1–12.Google Scholar
Augoustakis, A. (2005). ‘Nequaquam historia digna? Plinian Style in Ep. 6.20’, CJ 100: 265–73.Google Scholar
Augoustakis, A., (2005/06). ‘Pliny Epistulae 4.13: “Communal Conspiracy” at Comum’, CW 99: 419–22.Google Scholar
Auhagen, U. (2003). ‘Lusus und gloria – Plinius’ hendecasyllabi (Ep. 4,14; 5,3 und 7,4)’, in Castagna, and Lefèvre, (2003): 3–13.Google Scholar
Baeza-Angulo, E. (2015). ‘Plinio y Calpurnia, un matrimonio elegíaco’, Euphrosyne 43: 69–82.Google Scholar
Baeza-Angulo, E., (2016). ‘Deleite y tormento. El amor de Plinio y Calpurnia (Epist. 6.7)’, Agora: Estudos Clássicos em Debate 18: 121–40.Google Scholar
Baier, T. (2003). ‘Κτῆμα oder ἀγώνισμα: Plinius über historischen und rhetorischen Stil (Epist. 5,8)’, in Castagna, and Lefèvre, (2003): 69–81.Google Scholar
Bakhtin, M, (1981). The Dialogic Imagination: Four Essays by M. Bakhtin. Edited by M. Holquist, translated by C. Emerson and M. Holquist. Austin.Google Scholar
Baldo, G. (2004). M. Tulli Ciceronis, In C. Verrem actionis secundae liber quartus (De Signis). Florence.Google Scholar
Balmaceda, C. (2017). Virtus Romana: Politics and Morality in the Roman Historians. Chapel Hill.Google Scholar
Barchiesi, A. (2001). Speaking Volumes. Narrative and Intertext in Ovid and Other Latin Poets. London.Google Scholar
Barchiesi, A. (2005). ‘The Search for the Perfect Book: A PS to the New Posidippus’, in Gutzwiller, K. (ed.). The New Posidippus: A Hellenistic Poetry Book. Oxford: 320–42.Google Scholar
Bartsch, S. (1994). Actors in the Audience: Theatricality and Doublespeak from Nero to Hadrian. Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
Basile, A. (2014). ‘Alcune riflessioni sulla rappresentazione letteraria delle ville campane in età flavia’, in Devillers, (2014): 79–87.Google Scholar
Baumann, H. (2018). Das Epos im Blick. Intertextualität und Rollenkonstruktionen in Martials Epigrammen und Statius’ “Silvae”. Berlin.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Beagon, M., (2005). The Elder Pliny on the Human Animal. Natural History Book 7. Oxford.Google Scholar
Beck, J.-W. (2013a). ‘petis, ut tibi … scribam … (Plinius epist. 6,16 und 20)’, GFA 16: 1–28.Google Scholar
Beck, J.-W., (2013b). ‘Pro captu lectoris habent sua fata … – Plinius und der Eklat Epist. 6,15’, Hermes 141: 294–308.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Beck, J.-W., (2016). ‘incidi in materiam … Plinius und der Delphin (epist. 9,33)’, GFA 19: 61–87.Google Scholar
Behrendt, A. (2013). Mit Zitaten kommunizieren: Untersuchungen zur Zitierweise in der Korrespondenz des Marcus Tullius Cicero. Rahden.Google Scholar
Bek, L. (1976). ‘Antithesis: A Roman Attitude and its Changes as Reflected in the Concept of Architecture from Vitruvius to Pliny the Younger’, in Ascani, K. (ed.). Studia Romana in honorem P. Krarup septuagenarii. Odense: 154–66.Google Scholar
Bernstein, N.W. (2008). ‘Each Man’s Father Served as His Teacher: Constructing Relatedness in Pliny’s Letters’, ClAnt. 27: 203–30.Google Scholar
Berry, D.H. (2008). ‘Letters from an Advocate: Pliny’s “Vesuvius” Narratives (Epistles 6.16; 6.20)’, in Cairns, F. (ed.). Hellenistic Greek and Augustan Poetry, Flavian and post-Flavian Latin Poetry, Greek and Roman Prose. Cambridge: 297–313.Google Scholar
Beutel, F. (2000). Vergangenheit als Politik: Neue Aspekte im Werk des jüngeren Plinius. Frankfurt am Main.Google Scholar
Binder, G. (1995). ‘Öffentliche Autorenlesungen. Zur Kommunikation zwischen römischen Autoren und ihrem Publikum’, in Binder, G. and Ehlich, K. (eds.). Kommunikation durch Zeichen und Wort. Stätten und Formen der Kommunikation im Altertum IV. Trier: 265–332.Google Scholar
Bodel, J., (2015). ‘The Publication of Pliny’s Letters’, in Marchesi, (2015a): 13–108.Google Scholar
Borg, M. (2014). “Toeing the Line?”: Pliny the Younger and the Senatorial Opposition to Domitian. Dissertation, Sydney.Google Scholar
Borzsák, S. (1966). ‘Der weinende Xerxes: Zur Geschichte seines Ruhmes’, Eos 56: 39–52.Google Scholar
Boyle, A.J. (1994). Seneca’s Troades, Introduction, Text, Translation and Commentary. Leeds.Google Scholar
Bradley, K. (2010). ‘The Exemplary Pliny’, in Deroux, C. (ed.). Studies in Latin Literature and Roman History 15. Brussels: 384–422.Google Scholar
Braund, S.H. (1989). ‘City and Country in Roman Satire’, in Braund, S.H. (ed.). Satire and Society in Ancient Rome. Exeter: 23–47.Google Scholar
Buchner, A. (A. Buchnerus) (1644). C. Plinii Caecilii Secundi Epistolarum libri X cum notis. Frankfurt.Google Scholar
Bütler, H.-P. (1970). Die geistige Welt der jüngeren Plinius. Studien zur Thematik seiner Briefe. Heidelberg.Google Scholar
Burnikel, W. (1980). Untersuchungen zur Struktur des Witzepigramms bei Lukillios und Martial. Wiesbaden.Google Scholar
Butterfield, D.J. (2013). The Early Textual History of Lucretius’ De Rerum Natura. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Cancik, H. (1965). Untersuchungen zur lyrischen Kunst des P. Papinius Statius. Hildesheim.Google Scholar
Canobbio, A. (2015). ‘Echi di Marziale nell’epistola 4.14 die Plinio il Giovane’, Prometheus 41: 189–207.Google Scholar
Canobbio, A., (2017). ‘Elementi senecani nell’epistola 3.5 di Plinio il Giovane’, Athenaeum 105: 120–36.Google Scholar
Canobbio, A., (2019). ‘L’epistola 1.10 di Plinio il Giovane. Il filosofo Eufrate tra Seneca e Quintiliano’, Athenaeum 107: 128–49.Google Scholar
Canobbio, A., (2020). ‘Polarizzazione e coincidentia oppositorum nelle ville di Plinio il Giovane’, Athenaeum 108: 89–113.Google Scholar
Carey, S. (2003). Pliny’s Catalogue of Culture. Art and Empire in the Natural History. Oxford.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carlon, J. (2009). Pliny’s Women: Constructing Virtue and Creating Identity in the Roman World. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Carlon, J., (2018). ‘You Can Go Home Again: Pliny the Younger Writes to Comum’, BICS 61: 56–65.Google Scholar
Cavarzere, A., Aloni, A. and Barchiesi, A. (eds.) (2001). Iambic Ideas: Essays on a Poetic Tradition from Archaic Greece to the Late Roman Empire. Lanham, MD.Google Scholar
Castagna, L. and Lefèvre, E. (eds.) (2003). Plinius der Jüngere und seine Zeit. Munich.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chinn, C.M. (2007). ‘Before Your Very Eyes: Pliny Epistulae 5.6 and the Ancient Theory of Ekphrasis’, CPh 102: 265–80.Google Scholar
Citroni Marchetti, S. (1991). Plinio il Vecchio e la tradizione del moralismo romano. Pisa.Google Scholar
Coleman, K. (2012). ‘Bureaucratic Language in the Correspondence between Pliny and Trajan’, TAPA 142: 189–238.Google Scholar
Colish, M.L. (1990). The Stoic Tradition from Antiquity to the Early Middles Ages, 1. Stoicism in Classical Latin Literature. Leiden.Google Scholar
Collins, H. and Evans, R., (2015). ‘Expertise Revisited, Part 1 – Interactional Expertise’, Studies in History and Philosophy of Science 54: 113–23.Google Scholar
Collins, H. and Evans, R., (2016). ‘Expertise Revisited, Part 2 – Contributory Expertise’, Studies in History and Philosophy of Science 56: 103–110.Google Scholar
Collins, H. and Evans, R., (2018). ‘A Sociological/Philosophical Perspective in Expertise’, in Ericsson, K.A. and Hoffman, R.R. (eds.). The Cambridge Handbook of Expertise and Expert Performance. Cambridge: 21–32.Google Scholar
Conte, G.B. (1986). The Rhetoric of Imitation: Genre and Poetic Memory in Virgil and Other Latin Poets. Ithaca.Google Scholar
Cooley, A.E. (2009). Res Gestae Divi Augusti. Text, Translation, and Commentary, Cambridge.Google Scholar
Copony, R. (1987). ‘Fortes Fortuna iuvat. Fiktion und Realität im 1. Vesuvbrief des Jüngeren Plinius VI, 16’, GB 14: 215–28.Google Scholar
Corbier, M. (1997). ‘Pallas et la statue de César. Affichage et espace public à Rome’, RN 152: 11–40.Google Scholar
Cordes, L. (2017). Kaiser und Tyrann. Die Kodierung und Umkodierung der Herrscherrepräsentation Neros und Domitians. Berlin.Google Scholar
Cova, P.V., (1975). ‘Contributo allo studio della lettera pliniana sulla storia’, RCCM 17: 117–39.Google Scholar
Cova, P.V., (1978). Lo stoico imperfetto: un’immagine minore dell’uomo nella letteratura latina del Principato. Naples.Google Scholar
Cova, P.V., (2001). ‘Plinio il Giovane contro Plinius il Vecchio’, BStudLat 31: 55–67.Google Scholar
Cugusi, P. (1983). Evoluzione e forme dell’epistolografia latina nella tarda repubblica e nei primi due secoli dell’impero. Rome.Google Scholar
Cugusi, P., (2003). ‘Qualche riflessione sulle idee retoriche di Plinio il Giovane: Epistulae 1,20 e 9,26’, in Castagna, and Lefèvre, (2003): 95–122.Google Scholar
Culpepper Stroup, S. (2010). Catullus, Cicero, and a Society of Patrons. The Generation of the Text. Cambridge.Google Scholar
D’Agostino, V. (1962). Studi sul neostoicismo: Seneca, Plinio il Giovane, Epitteto, Marco Aurelio. Turin (second edition).Google Scholar
Dahlmann, H. (1980). ‘Die Hendekasyllaben des Sentius Augurinus, Plinius ep. 4. 27’, Gymnasium 87: 167–77.Google Scholar
Danesi Marioni, G. (1989). ‘Un martirio stoico: Silio Italico, Pun. 1.169 sgg.’, Prometheus 15: 245–53.Google Scholar
Darab, Á. (2012). ‘Corinthium aes versus electrum: The Anecdote as an Expression of Roman Identity in Pliny the Elder’s Naturalis Historia’, Hermes 140: 149–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Darab, Á., (2015). ‘Corinthium aes. Die Entstehung und Metamorphose einer Anekdote’, WS 128: 1–14.Google Scholar
Davie, J. and Cowan, R. (eds.) (2011). Horace: Satires and Epistles. Translated by J. Davie, with an Introduction and Notes by R. Cowan. Oxford.Google Scholar
DeLaine, J. (1995). ‘“De aquis suis”? The “commentarius” of Frontinus’, in Nicolet, C. (ed.). Les littératures techniques dans l’Antiquité romaine: Statut, public et destination, tradition. Vanoevres-Geneva: 117–45.Google Scholar
Delarue, F. (2014). ‘L’eau et l’imaginaire. Les villas des Silves de Stace’, in Devillers, (2014): 89–98.Google Scholar
De Paolis, P. (2000). ‘Cicerone nei grammatici tardoantichi e medievali’, in Cicerone nel medioevo. Atti dell’XI Colloquium Tullianum. Cassino-Montecassino, 26–28 aprile 1999. Rome (= Ciceroniana 11, 2000): 36–67.Google Scholar
De Pretis, A. (2003). ‘Insincerity, Facts, and Epistolarity: Approaches to Pliny’s Epistles to Calpurnia’, in Morello and Gibson (2003): 127–46.Google Scholar
Devillers, O. (ed.) (2014). Neronia 9: La villégiature dans le monde romaine de Tibère à Hadrien. Actes du IXe congrès de la SIEN. Bordeaux.Google Scholar
Devillers, O., (ed.) (2015a). Autour de Pline le Jeune: En hommage à Nicole Méthy. Bordeaux.Google Scholar
Devillers, O. (2015b). ‘Néron selon Pline le Jeune: Entre Pline l’Ancien, Tacite et Trajan’, in Devillers, (2015a): 61–71.Google Scholar
Dinter, M.T. and Reitz-Joosse, B. (eds.) (2019). Special Issue: ‘Intermediality and Roman Literature’ (Trends in Classics 11.1). Berlin.Google Scholar
Dix, T.K. and Houston, G.W. (2006). ‘Public Libraries in the City of Rome from the Augustan Age to the Time of Diocletian’, MÉFRA 118: 671–717.Google Scholar
Dominik, W. (2007). ‘Tacitus and Pliny on Oratory’, in Dominik, W. and Hall, J. (eds.). Companion to Roman Rhetoric. Malden, MA: 323–38.Google Scholar
Dominik, W., (2010). ‘The Reception of Silius Italicus in Modern Scholarship’, in Augoustakis, A. (ed.). Brill’s Companion to Silius Italicus. Leiden: 425–47.Google Scholar
Doody, A. (2010). Pliny’s Encyclopedia: The Reception of the Natural History. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Dufallo, B. (2000). ‘Satis/satura: Reconsidering the “Programmatic Intent” of Horace’s Satires 1.1’, CW 93: 579–90.Google Scholar
Dunkle, J.R. (1967). ‘The Greek Tyrant and Roman Political Invective of the Late Republic’, TAPA 98: 151–71.Google Scholar
Dupraz, E. (2020). ‘Une allusion à Épicure dans la lettre de Pline le Jeune sur la mort de Silius Italicus?’, in Sans, B. and Vanhalme, C. (eds.). À l’école de l’Antiquité, Hommages à Ghislaine Viré. Brussels: 149–53.Google Scholar
Durry, M. (1938). Pline le Jeune. Panégyrique de Trajan. Préfacé, édité et commenté. Paris.Google Scholar
Eck, W. (1982). ‘Jahres- und Provinzialfasten der senatorischen Statthalter von 69/70 bis 138/139’, Chiron: 281–362.Google Scholar
Eck, W., (2001). ‘Die grosse Pliniusinschrift aus Comum: Funktion und Monument’, in Bertinelli, G.A. and Donati, A. (eds.). Varia Epigraphica. Atti del Colloquio Internazionale di Epigrafia. Bertinoro, 8–10 giugno 2000. Faenza: 225–35.Google Scholar
Eco, U. (1990). ‘A Portrait of the Elder as a Young Pliny’, in Eco, U., The Limits of Interpretation. Bloomington: 123–36.Google Scholar
Edmunds, L., (2015). ‘Pliny the Younger on his Verse and Martial’s Non-Recognition of Pliny as a Poet’, HSPh 108: 309–60.Google Scholar
Edwards, C., (1997). ‘Self-Scrutiny and Self-Transformation in Seneca’s Letters’, G&R 54: 23–38.Google Scholar
Egelhaaf-Gaiser, U. (2002). ‘Panegyrik, Denkmal und Publikum. Plinius, Brief 8,4 und die Kommemoration der Dakertriumphe im Orts- und Medienwandel’, in Auffarth, C. and Rüpke, J. (eds.). Ἐπιτομὴ τῆς οἰκουμένης. Studien zur römischen Religion in Antike und Neuzeit: für Hubert Cancik und Hildegard Cancik-Lindemaier. Stuttgart: 113–37.Google Scholar
Fain, G.L. (2008). Writing Epigrams. The Art of Composition in Catullus, Callimachus and Martial. Brussels.Google Scholar
Fairclough, R.H. and Goold, G.P. (1999). Virgil. Eclogues, Georgics, Aeneid: Books 1–6. Cambridge, MA (first edition 1916).Google Scholar
Fantham, E. (2014). ‘On Tranquility of Mind’, in E. Fantham, H.M. Hine, J. Ker and G.D. Williams (trans.). Seneca: Hardship and Happiness. Chicago: 177–215.Google Scholar
Farrell, J. (1991). Vergil’s Georgics and the Traditions of Ancient Epic: The Art of Allusion in Literary History. Oxford.Google Scholar
Farrell, J., (2001). Latin Language and Latin Culture from Ancient to Modern Times. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Ferri, R. (1993). I dispiaceri di un epicureo. Uno studio sulla poetica oraziana delle Epistole (con un capitolo su Persio). Pisa.Google Scholar
Fitzgerald, W., (2021). ‘The Slave, Between Absence and Presence’, in Geue, and Giusti, (2021): 239–49.Google Scholar
Floridi, L. (2014). Lucillio, “Epigrammi”: Introduzione, testo critico, traduzione e commento. Berlin.Google Scholar
Fögen, T. (2000). Patrii sermonis egestas: Einstellungen lateinischer Autoren zu ihrer Muttersprache: ein Beitrag zum Sprachbewusstsein in der römischen Antike. Munich.Google Scholar
Fögen, T., (2007). ‘Statius’ Roman Penelope: Exemplarity, Praise and Gender in Silvae 3.5’, Philologus 151: 256–72.Google Scholar
Fögen, T., (2015). ‘Ars moriendi: Literarische Portraits von Selbsttötung bei Plinius dem Jüngeren und Tacitus’, A&A 61: 21–56.Google Scholar
Fögen, T., (2017). ‘Gattungsvielfalt in den Briefen des Jüngeren Plinius: Episteln im Spannungsfeld von ethischer Unterweisung und literarischer Pluridimensionalität’, Gymnasium 124: 21–60.Google Scholar
Frazel, T.D. (2005). ‘Furtum and the Description of Stolen Objects in Cicero, In Verrem 2.4’, AJPh 126: 363–76.Google Scholar
Galán Vioque, G. (2002). Martial, Book VII. A Commentary. Translated by Zoltowski, J.J.. Leiden.Google Scholar
Gale, M. (2000). Virgil on the Nature of Things: The Georgics, Lucretius, and the Didactic Tradition. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Galimberti Biffino, G. (2015). ‘“Scrivere” il corpo o della salute e della malattia nell’epistolario di Plinio il Giovane’, in Devillers, (2015a): 171–81.Google Scholar
Gasser, F. (1999). Germana patria. Die Geburtsheimat in den Werken römischer Autoren der späten Republik und der frühen Kaiserzeit. Stuttgart.Google Scholar
Gatzemeier, S. (2013). Ut ait Lucretius: die Lukrezrezeption in der lateinischen Prosa bis Laktanz. Göttingen.Google Scholar
Gauly, B.M. (2008). ‘Magis homines iuvat gloria lata quam magna: das Selbstlob in Plinius’ Briefen und seine Funktion’, in Gauly, B.M. and Arweiler, A.H. (eds.). Machtfragen: zur kulturellen Repräsentation und Konstruktion von Macht in Antike, Mittelalter und Neuzeit. Stuttgart: 187–204.Google Scholar
Gazich, R. (2003). ‘Retorica dell’esemplarità nelle lettere di Plinio’, in Castagna, and Lefèvre, (2003): 123–41.Google Scholar
Gesner, I.M. (1770). C. Plinii Caecilii Secundi Epistolarum libri decem […], Lipsiae (second edition by A.W. Ernesti).Google Scholar
Geue, T. (2018). ‘Forgetting the Juvenalien in our Midst: Literary Amnesia in the Satires’, in König, and Whitton, (2018b): 366–84.Google Scholar
Geue, T. and Giusti, E. (eds.) (2021). Unspoken Rome: Absence in Latin Literature and its Reception. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Gibson, R. (2003). ‘Pliny and the Art of Inoffensive Self-praise’, in Morello, and Gibson, (2003): 235–54.Google Scholar
Gibson, R., (2011a). ‘<Clarus> Confirmed? Pliny, Epistles 1.1 and Sidonius Apollinaris’, CQ 61: 655–9.Google Scholar
Gibson, R., (2011b). ‘Elder and Better: The Naturalis Historia and the Letters of the Younger Pliny’, in Gibson, and Morello, (2011): 187–205.Google Scholar
Gibson, R., (2013). ‘Letters into Autobiography: The Generic Mobility of the Ancient Letter Collection’, in Papanghelis, , Harrison, and Frangoulidis, (2013): 387–416.Google Scholar
Gibson, R., (2014a). ‘Starting with the Index in Pliny’, in Jansen, L. (ed.). The Roman Paratext. Frame, Texts, Readers. Cambridge: 33–55.Google Scholar
Gibson, R., (2014b). ‘Suetonius and the viri illustres of Pliny the Younger’, in Power, T. and Gibson, R. (eds.). Suetonius the Biographer. Oxford: 199–230.Google Scholar
Gibson, R., (2015). ‘Not Dark Yet…: Reading to the End of Pliny’s Nine-Book Collection’, in Marchesi, (2015a): 185–223.Google Scholar
Gibson, R., (2018). ‘Pliny and Plutarch’s Practical Ethics: A Newly Rediscovered Dialogue’, in König, and Whitton, (2018b): 402–21.Google Scholar
Gibson, R., (2021). ‘Calpurnia of Comum and the Ghost of Umbria: Marriage and Regional Identity in the Epistulae of Pliny’, in Millić, L. Galli and Stoehr-Monjou, A. (eds.). Au-delà de l’épithalame. Le marriage dans la literature latine (IIIe s. av. – VIe s. ap. J.-C.). Turnhout: 245–66.Google Scholar
Gibson, R., (forthcoming). Pliny. Epistles Book VI. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Gibson, R. and Morello, R. (eds.) (2011). Pliny the Elder: Themes and Contexts. Leiden.Google Scholar
Gibson, R. and Morello, R. (2012). Reading the Letters of Pliny the Younger: An Introduction. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Gibson, R. and Whitton, C.L. (eds.) (2016). The Epistles of Pliny. Oxford Readings in Classical Studies. Oxford.Google Scholar
Gierig, G.E. (1800–2). C. Plinii Caecilii Secundi Epistolarum libri decem, 2 vols. Leipzig.Google Scholar
Gigante, M. (1979). ‘Il racconto pliniano dell’eruzione del Vesuvio dell’a. 79’, PP 34: 321–76 (reprinted as Gigante 1989).Google Scholar
Gildenhard, I. (2011). Creative Eloquence: The Construction of Reality in Cicero’s Speeches. Oxford.Google Scholar
Giumlia-Mair, A.R. and Craddock, P. (1993). Das schwarze Gold der Alchimisten: Corinthium aes. Mainz.Google Scholar
Gleason, M. (2008). Making Men: Sophists and Self-Presentation in Ancient Rome. Princeton.Google Scholar
Görler, W. (1979). ‘Kaltblütiges Schnarchen. Zum literarischen Hintergrund der Vesuvbriefe des jüngeren Plinius’, in Bowersock, G.W., Burkert, W. and Putnam, M.C.J. (eds.). Arktouros. Hellenic Studies Presented to Bernard M.W. Knox on the Occasion of his 65th Birthday. Berlin: 427–33.Google Scholar
Goguey, D. (1982). ‘Le paysage dans les Silves de Stace: conventions poétiques et observation réaliste’, Latomus 41: 602–13.Google Scholar
Graver, M., (2009). ‘The Weeping Wise: Stoic and Epicurean Consolations in Seneca’s 99th Epistle’, in Fögen, T. (ed.). Tears in the Greco-Roman World. Berlin: 235–52.Google Scholar
Green, R.P.H. (1991). The Works of Ausonius. Edited with Introduction and Commentary. Oxford.Google Scholar
Griffin, M., (2000). ‘Seneca and Pliny’, in Rowe, C. and Schofield, M. (eds.). The Cambridge History of Greek and Roman Political Thought. Cambridge: 532–58.Google Scholar
Griffin, M., (2007). ‘The Younger Pliny’s Debt to Moral Philosophy’, HSPh 103: 451–81.Google Scholar
Grilli, A. (1992). ‘Musonio ο il sospetto d’un mondo alla rovescia’, in La langue latine, langue de la philosophie. Actes du colloque de Rome (17–19 mai 1990). Rome: 173–86.Google Scholar
Gros, P. (1978). ‘Vie et mort de l’art hellénistique selon Vitruve et Pline’, REL 56: 289–313.Google Scholar
Gualandri, I. (2020). ‘Sidonius’ Intertextuality’, in Kelly, G. and van Waarden, J. (eds.). The Edinburgh Companion to Sidonius Apollinaris. Edinburgh: 279–316.Google Scholar
Guérin, C. (2012–13). ‘Intempestiua philosophia? Éloquence déclamatoire et éloquence philosophique au Ier siècle ap. J.-C’, Ítaca. Quaderns Catalans de Cultura Clàssica 28-29: 21–43.Google Scholar
Guillemin, A.-M., (1953–62). Pline le Jeune. Lettres I–IX, 3 vols. Paris (second edition).Google Scholar
Guillemin, A.-M., (1961–64). Pline le Jeune: Lettres. Panégyrique de Trajan, 4 vols. Paris.Google Scholar
Haack, M.L. (2002). ‘Haruspices publics et privés: tentative d’une distinction’, REA 104: 111–33.Google Scholar
Haake, M. (2019). ‘“How to do things with senatus consulta”: Die Autorität des Rechtsdokuments und die Stimme des Autors im Briefcorpus des Jüngeren Plinius’, in Buongiorno, P. and Traina, G. (eds.). Rappresentazione e uso dei senatus consulta nelle fonti letterarie del principato. Stuttgart: 117–42.Google Scholar
Hagendahl, H. (1947). ‘Methods of Citation in Post-Classical Latin Prose’, Eranos 45: 114–28.Google Scholar
Hallett, J. (1984). Fathers and Daughters in Roman Society: Women and the Elite Family. Princeton.Google Scholar
Hallett, J., (2002). ‘The Vindolanda Letters from Claudia Severa’, in Churchill, L., Brown, P. and Jeffrey, J. (eds.). Women Writing Latin, vol. 1. New York: 93–9.Google Scholar
Hammar, I. (2013). Making Enemies: The Logic of Immorality in Ciceronian Oratory. Lund.Google Scholar
Hanaghan, M.P. (2017a). ‘Latent Criticism of Anthemius and Ricimer in Sidonius Apollinaris’ Epistulae 1.5’, CQ 67: 631–49.Google Scholar
Hanaghan, M.P., (2017b). ‘Micro Allusions to Pliny the Younger and Virgil in Sidonius’ Programmatic Epistles’, IJCT 24: 249–61.Google Scholar
Hanaghan, M.P., (2017c). ‘Note de lecture: The Temporality of Seneca’s Epistles’, Latomus 76: 203–6.Google Scholar
Hardie, A. (1983). Statius and the Silvae: Poets, Patrons, and Epideixis in the Graeco-Roman World. Liverpool.Google Scholar
Hardie, P.R. (2009). Lucretian Receptions: History, the Sublime, Knowledge. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Harich-Schwarzbauer, H. and Hindermann, J. (2010). ‘Garten und Villenlandschaft in der römischen Literatur. Sozialer und ästhetischer Diskurs bei Vergil und Plinius dem Jüngeren’, in Faber, R. and Holste, C. (eds.). Arkadische Kulturlandschaft und Gartenkunst. Eine Tour d’Horizon. Würzburg: 57–68.Google Scholar
Harries, J.D. (2018). ‘Saturninus the Helmsman, Pliny and Friends: Legal and Literary Letter Collections’, in König, and Whitton, (2018b): 260–79.Google Scholar
Harrison, S.J., (2013). ‘Introduction’, in Papanghelis, , Harrison, and Frangoulidis, (2013): 1–19.Google Scholar
Harrison, S.J., Frangoulidis, S. and Papanghelis, T.D. (eds.) (2018). Intratextuality and Latin Literature. Berlin.Google Scholar
Hartmann, E. (2012). ‘Die Kunst der edlen Selbstdarstellung. Plinius der Jüngere als Kunstkenner und Euerget’, in Fuhrer, T. and Renger, A.B. (eds.). Performanz von Wissen. Strategien der Wissensvermittlung in der Vormoderne. Heidelberg: 109–27.Google Scholar
Hausmann, M. (2009). Die Lesererlenkung durch Tacitus in den Tiberius- und Claudiusbüchern der “Annalen”. Berlin.Google Scholar
Hemelrijk, E.A. (1999). Matrona Docta: Educated Women in the Roman Élite from Cornelia to Julia Domna. London.Google Scholar
Henderson, J.G. (1993). ‘Be Alert (Your Country Needs Lerts): Horace, Satires 1.9’, PCPS 39: 67–93.Google Scholar
Henderson, J.G., (2001). ‘On Pliny on Martial on Pliny on Anon … (Epistles 3.21/Epigrams 10.19)’, Ramus 30: 56–87.Google Scholar
Henderson, J.G., (2002a). ‘Knowing Someone Through Their Books: Pliny on Uncle Pliny (Epistles 3.5)’, CPh 97: 256–84.Google Scholar
Henderson, J.G., (2002b). Pliny’s Statue: The Letters, Self-portraiture, and Classical Art. Exeter.Google Scholar
Henderson, J.G., (2011). ‘The Nature of Man: Pliny, Historia Naturalis as Cosmogram’, MD 66: 139–71.Google Scholar
Higham, T.F. (1960). ‘Nature Note: Dolphin-Riders. Ancient Stories Vindicated’, G&R 7: 82–6.Google Scholar
Hiltbrunner, O. (1979). ‘Prisce, iubes…’, Zeitschrift der Savigny-Stiftung für Rechtsgeschichte (Romanist. Abt.) 96: 31–42.Google Scholar
Hindermann, J., (2010). ‘similis excluso a vacuo limine recedo – Plinius’ Inszenierung seiner Ehe als elegisches Liebesverhältnis’, in Formisano, M. and Fuhrer, T. (eds.). Gender-Studies in den Altertumswissenschaften: Gender-Inszenierungen in der antiken Literatur. Trier: 45–63.Google Scholar
Hindermann, J., (2011a). ‘Verliebte Delphine, schwimmende Inseln und versiegende Quellen beim älteren und jüngeren Plinius: mirabilia und ihre Erzählpotenz (epp. 4,30; 8,20; 9,33)’, Gymnasium 118: 345–54.Google Scholar
Hindermann, J., (2011b). ‘Zoophilie in Zoologie und Roman: Sex und Liebe zwischen Mensch und Tier bei Plutarch, Plinius dem Älteren, Aelian und Apuleius’, Dictynna 8 (en ligne).Google Scholar
Hindermann, J., (2014). ‘Beispielhafte männliche Trauer in Plinius’ Epistulae. Zum Normdiskurs römischer Konsolation’, in Plotke, S. and Ziem, A. (eds.). Sprache der Trauer. Verbalisierung einer Emotion in historischer Perspektive. Heidelberg: 285–304.Google Scholar
Hinds, S. (1998). Allusion and Intertext: Dynamics of Appropriation in Roman Poetry. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Hinds, S., (2001). ‘Cinna, Statius, and “Immanent Literary History” in the Cultural Economy’, in Schmidt, E.A. (ed.), L’histoire littéraire immanente dans la poésie latine. Geneva: 221–57.Google Scholar
Höschele, R. (2007). ‘The Traveling Reader: Journeys through Ancient Epigram Books’, TAPA 137: 333–69.Google Scholar
Höschele, R., (2010). Die blütenlesende Muse. Poetik und Textualität antiker Epigrammsammlungen. Tübingen.Google Scholar
Hoffer, S.E., (2006). ‘Divine Comedy? Accession Propaganda in Pliny, Epistles 10.1-2 and the Panegyric’, JRS 96: 73–87.Google Scholar
Holford-Strevens, L. (2001). ‘Getting Away with Murder: The Literary and Forensic Fortune of Two Roman exempla’, IJCT 7: 489–514.Google Scholar
Holzberg, N., (2007). ‘Narrare und iocari. Lateinische Briefe von Cicero bis in die frühe Neuzeit als Literatur’, in Kussl, R. (ed.). Antike Welt und Literatur. Einblicke, Analysen und Vermittlung im Unterricht. Speyer: 101–14.Google Scholar
Howe, N. (1985). ‘In Defense of the Encyclopedic Mode: On Pliny’s Preface to the Natural History’, Latomus 46: 561–76.Google Scholar
Hutchinson, G. (2013). ‘Genre and Super-Genre’, in Papanghelis, , Harrison, and Frangoulidis, (2013): 19–34.Google Scholar
Illias-Zarifopol, C. (1994). Portrait of a Pragmatic Hero: Narrative Strategies of Self-Presentation in Pliny’s Letters. Dissertation, Indiana University.Google Scholar
Isager, J. (1998). Pliny on Art and Society. The Elder Pliny’s Chapters on the History of Art. Odense.Google Scholar
Jacquier, J. (2019). ‘Leere Räume – die Kunst der Beschreibung in Plinius’ epistula 5, 6’, in Citroni, M., Labate, M. and Rosati, G. (eds.). Luoghi dell’abitare, immaginazione letteraria e identità romana. Da Augusto ai Flavi. Pisa: 289–300.Google Scholar
Janka, M. (2015). ‘Plinius und die Poesie. Von der Freizeitdichtung zur Literaturtheorie’, Gymnasium 122: 597–618.Google Scholar
Jensen, K.B. (2016). ‘Intermediality’, in Jensen, K.B. and Craig, R.T. (eds.). The International Encyclopaedia of Communication Theory and Philosophy. Chichester. (https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118766804.wbiect170).Google Scholar
Johnson, W.A. (2010). Readers and Reading Culture in the High Roman Empire: A Study of Elite Communities. Oxford.Google Scholar
Jones, N.F. (2001). ‘Pliny the Younger’s Vesuvius Letters (6.16 and 6.20)’, CW 95: 31–48.Google Scholar
Joseph, T.A. (2012). Tacitus the Epic Successor. Virgil, Lucan, and the Narrative of Civil War in the Histories. Leiden.Google Scholar
Keeline, T. (2013). ‘The Literary and Stylistic Qualities of a Plinian Letter: A Commentary on Ep. 7.9’, HSPh 107: 229–64.Google Scholar
Kelly, G. (2018). ‘From Martial to Juvenal (Epigrams 12.18)’, in König, and Whitton, (2018b): 160‒79.Google Scholar
Ker, J. (2004). ‘Nocturnal Writers in Imperial Rome: The Culture of Lucubratio’, CPh 99: 209–42.Google Scholar
Klodt, C. (2012). ‘Patrem mira similitudine exscripserat. Plinius’ Nachruf auf eine perfekte Tochter (epist. 5, 16)’, Gymnasium 119: 23–61.Google Scholar
Kochin, M.S. (2002). ‘Time and Judgement in Demosthenes’ De Corona’, Philosophy and Rhetoric 35: 77–89.Google Scholar
Köhler, H. (1995). C. Sollius Apollinaris Sidonius, Briefe Buch I. Einleitung-Text-Übersetzung-Kommentar. Heidelberg.Google Scholar
König, A. (2007). ‘Knowledge and Power in Frontinus’ On Aqueducts’, in König, J. and Whitmarsh, T. (eds.). Ordering Knowledge in the Roman Empire. Cambridge: 177–205.Google Scholar
König, A., (2020). ‘Tactical Interactions: Dialogues between Greece and Rome in the Military Manuals of Aelian and Arrian’, in König, , Langlands, and Uden, (2020): 134–56.Google Scholar
König, A., Langlands, R. and Uden, J. (eds.) (2020). Literature and Culture in the Roman Empire, 96–235 ce: Cross-cultural Interactions. Cambridge.Google Scholar
König, A. and Whitton, C. (2018a). ‘Introduction’, in König, and Whitton, (2018b): 1–34.Google Scholar
König, A. and Whitton, C., (eds.) (2018b). Roman Literature under Nerva, Trajan and Hadrian: Literary Interactions, ad 96–138. Cambridge.Google Scholar
König, J. and Woolf, G. (eds.) (2017). Authority and Expertise in Ancient Scientific Culture. Cambridge.Google Scholar
König, R. (1973). C. Plinius Secundus d.Ä. Naturkunde. Lateinisch-Deutsch, Buch 1. Herausgegeben und übersetzt, in Zusammenarbeit mit Gerhard Winkler. Munich.Google Scholar
Koster, S. (1980). Die Invektive in der griechischen und römischen Literatur. Meisenheim am Glan.Google Scholar
Krasser, H. (1993a). ‘Claros colere viros oder über engagierte Bewunderung. Zum Selbstverständnis des jüngeren Plinius’, Philologus 137: 62–71.Google Scholar
Krasser, H., (1993b). ‘extremos pudeat rediisse – Plinius im Wettstreit mit der Vergangenheit. Zu Vergilzitaten beim jüngeren Plinius’, A&A 39: 144–54.Google Scholar
Krasser, H., (1993c). ‘Laszives Vergnügen oder philosophisches Gespräch? Zum Text von Plinius Epist. 5,3,2’, Hermes 121: 254–8.Google Scholar
Krieckhaus, A. (2006). Senatorische Familien und ihre patriae (1./2. Jahrhundert n. Chr.). Hamburg.Google Scholar
Kubiak, D.P. (2010). ‘An Erotic Epigram of Cicero?’, in Deroux, C. (ed.). Studies in Latin Literature and Roman History 15. Brussels: 110–29.Google Scholar
La Bua, G. (2019). Cicero and Roman Education. The Reception of the Speeches and Ancient Scholarship. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Laguna, G. (1996). ‘Philosophical Topics in Statius’ Silvae: Sources and Aims’, in Delarue, F., Georgacopoulou, S., Laurens, P. et al. (eds.). Epicedion: Hommage à P. Papinius Statius 96–1996. Poitiers: 247–59.Google Scholar
Langlands, R. (2014). ‘Pliny’s Role Models of Both Sexes: Gender and Exemplarity in the Letters’, EuGeStA 4: 214–37.Google Scholar
Langlands, R., (2018). ‘Extratextuality: Literary Interactions with Oral Culture and Exemplary Ethics’, in König, and Whitton, (2018b): 330–46.Google Scholar
Laurenti, R. (1989). ‘Musonio, maestro di Epitteto’, in Haase, W. (ed.). Philosophie, Wissenschaften, Technik (ANRW 36.3). Berlin: 2105–47.Google Scholar
Lavan, M., (2018). ‘Pliny Epistles 10 and Imperial Correspondence: The Empire of Letters’, in König, and Whitton, (2018b): 280–301.Google Scholar
Lazzeretti, A. (2006). M. Tulli Ciceronis, In C. Verrem actionis secundae liber quartus (De Signis). Commento archeologico. Pisa.Google Scholar
Leach, E.W. (1990). ‘The Politics of Self-Representation: Pliny’s Letters and Roman Portrait Sculpture’, ClAnt 9: 14–39.Google Scholar
Leach, E.W., (2003). ‘Otium as luxuria: Economy of Status in the Younger Pliny’s Letters’, in Morello and Gibson (2003): 147–65.Google Scholar
Leach, E.W., (2013). ‘Pliny’s Epistolary Re-inscription: Writing the Tombs of Verginius Rufus and Pallas the Claudian Secretary a rationibus’, SyllClass 24: 125–44.Google Scholar
Lefèvre, E. (1988). ‘Plinius-Studien IV: Die Naturauffassung in den Beschreibungen der Quelle am Lacus Larius (4,30), des Clitumnus (8,8) und des Lacus Vadimo (8,20)’, Gymnasium 95: 236–69.Google Scholar
Lefèvre, E., (1989). ‘Plinius-Studien V: Vom Römertum zum Ästhetizismus. Die Würdigungen des älteren Plinius (3,5), Silius Italicus (3,7) und Martial (3,21)’, Gymnasium 96: 113–28.Google Scholar
Lefèvre, E., (1996a). ‘Plinius-Studien VI: Der grosse und der kleine Plinius. Die Vesuv-Briefe (6,16; 6,20)’, Gymnasium 103: 193–215.Google Scholar
Lefèvre, E., (1996b). ‘Plinius-Studien VII, Cicero das unerreichbare Vorbild (1,2; 3,15; 4,8; 7,4; 9,2)’, Gymnasium 103: 333–53.Google Scholar
Lefèvre, E., (2009). Vom Römertum zum Ästhetizismus: Studien zu den Briefen des jüngeren Plinius. Berlin.Google Scholar
Lehmann-Hartleben, K. (1936). Plinio il Giovane. Lettere scelte con commento archeologico. Florence (reprinted with an introduction by P. Zanker and up-to-date bibliography by A. Anguissola. Pisa 2007).Google Scholar
Leigh, M. (2013). From Polypragmon to Curiosus: Ancient Concepts of Curious and Meddlesome Behaviour. Oxford.Google Scholar
Levick, B.M. (1975). ‘Mercy and Moderation on the Coinage of Tiberius’, in Levick, B.M. (ed.). The Ancient Historian and His Material. Essays in Honour of C.E. Stevens. Westmead: 123–37.Google Scholar
Levick, B.M. (2013). ‘C. Plinius Secundus’, in Cornell, T.J. (ed.). The Fragments of the Roman Historians, vol. 1. Oxford: 525–34.Google Scholar
Lillge, F. (1918). ‘Die literarische Form der Briefe Plinius des Jüngeren über den Ausbruch des Vesuvius’, Sokrates 6: 209–34 and 273–97.Google Scholar
Long, O. (1901). On the Usage of quotiens and quotienscumque in Different Periods of Latin. Baltimore.Google Scholar
Lorenz, S. (2007). ‘Catullus and Martial’, in Skinner, M.B. (ed.). A Companion to Catullus. Malden, MA: 418–38.Google Scholar
Ludolph, M. (1997). Epistolographie und Selbstdarstellung. Untersuchungen zu den ‘Paradebriefen’ Plinius des Jüngeren. Tübingen.Google Scholar
Lyne, R.O.A.M. (1994). ‘Vergil’s Aeneid: Subversion by Intertextuality: Catullus 66.39–40 and Other Examples’, G&R 41: 187–204.Google Scholar
McDermott, W.C. and Orentzel, A.E. (1977). ‘Silius Italicus and Domitian’, AJPh 98: 24–34.Google Scholar
McNamara, J. (2021). ‘Pliny, Tacitus and the Monuments of Pallas’, CQ FirstView articles, 1–22, doi: http://10.1017/S0009838821000203 (accessed on 6/5/2021).Google Scholar
Malaspina, E. (2019). ‘Euphratès, Artémidore et ceux qui sapientiae studium habitu corporis praeferunt (Ep., I, 22, 6): la place de la philosophie dans la culture de Pline’, in Aubert-Baillot, S., Guérin, C. and Morlet, S. (eds.). La philosophie des non-philosophes dans l’Empire romain du Ier au IIIe siècle. Paris: 121–56.Google Scholar
Manuwald, G. (2003). ‘Eine “Schule” für Novum Comum (Epist. 4.13): Aspekte der liberalitas des Plinius’, in Castagna, and Lefèvre, (2003): 203–17.Google Scholar
Marchesi, I. (2008). The Art of Pliny’s Letters: A Poetics of Allusion in the Private Correspondence. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Marchesi, I., (2013). ‘Silenced Intertext: Pliny on Martial on Pliny (on Regulus)’, AJPh 134: 101–18.Google Scholar
Marchesi, I. (ed.) (2015a). Pliny the Book-maker: Betting on Posterity in the Epistles. Oxford.Google Scholar
Marchesi, I., (2015b). ‘Uncluttered Spaces, Unlittered Texts: Pliny’s Villas as Editorial Places’, in Marchesi, (2015a): 223–51.Google Scholar
Marchesi, I., (2018). ‘The Regulus Connection: Displacing Lucan between Martial and Pliny’, in König, and Whitton, (2018b): 349–65.Google Scholar
Marshall, A. (2009). ‘Statius and the Veteres: Silvae 1.3 and the Homeric House of Alcinous’, Scholia 18: 78–88.Google Scholar
Martelli, F. (2009). ‘Plumbing Helicon: Poetic Property and the Material World of Statius’ Silvae’, MD 62: 145–77.Google Scholar
Martin, R.H. (1967). ‘The Speech of Curtius Montanus: Tacitus, Histories IV, 42’, JRS 57: 109–14.Google Scholar
Mastrorosa, I.G. (2010). ‘La pratica dell’oratoria giudiziaria nell’alto impero: Quintiliano e Plinio il Giovane’, in Galand-Hallyn, P., Hallyn, F., Lévy, C. et al. (eds.). Quintilien: ancien et moderne études réunies. Latinitates, 3. Turnhout: 125–52.Google Scholar
Matier, K.O. (1981). ‘Prejudice and the Punica: Silius Italicus – A Reassessment’, AClass 24: 141–51.Google Scholar
Matier, K.O., (1988). ‘Prejudice and the Punica Again: Silius Italicus and his Critics’, Akroterion 33: 14–21.Google Scholar
Matier, K.O., (1989). Silius Italicus at Bay: Pliny, Prejudice and the Punica. Durban-Westville.Google Scholar
May, J.M. (1988). Trials of Character: The Eloquence of Ciceronian Ethos. Chapel Hill.Google Scholar
Merwald, G. (1964). Die Buchkomposition des jüngeren Plinius (Epistulae I–IX). Erlangen.Google Scholar
Méthy, N. (2003). ‘Ad exemplar antiquitatis: les grandes figures du passé dans la correspondance de Pline le Jeune’, REL 81: 200–14.Google Scholar
Méthy, N., (2004). ‘Lettre d’art et vie sociale: les citations dans la correspondance de Pline le Jeune’, in Nadjo, L. and Gavoille, E. (eds.). Epistulae antiquae III. Leuven: 463–76.Google Scholar
Méthy, N., (2007). Les lettres de Pline le Jeune: une représentation de l’homme. Paris.Google Scholar
Meyer, D. (2005). Inszeniertes Lesevergnügen. Das inschriftliche Epigramm und seine Rezeption bei Kallimachos. Stuttgart.Google Scholar
Millar, F. (2004). ‘Trajan: Government by Correspondence’, in Cotton, H.M. and Rògers, G.M. (eds.). Rome, the Greek World and the East, vol. 2. Chapel Hill: 23–46.Google Scholar
Miller, C.L. (1966). ‘The Younger Pliny’s Dolphin Story (Epistulae IX 33): An Analysis’, CW 60: 6–8.Google Scholar
Minos, C. (C. Minois or Mignault) (1598). Cai Plinii Secundi Epistolae […], 2 vols. Paris.Google Scholar
Morello, R. (2003). ‘Pliny and the Art of Saying Nothing’, in Morello and Gibson (2003): 187–209.Google Scholar
Morello, R., (2007). ‘Confidence, Inuidia, and Pliny’s Epistolary Curriculum’, in Morello, and Morrison, (2007): 169–89.Google Scholar
Morello, R., (2011). ‘Pliny and the Encyclopaedic Addressee’, in Gibson, and Morello, (2011): 147–65.Google Scholar
Morello, R., (2015). ‘Pliny Book 8. Two Viewpoints and the Pedestrian Reader’, in Marchesi, (2015a): 144–84.Google Scholar
Morello, R., (2018). ‘Traditional exempla and Nerva’s New Modernity: Making Fabricius Take the Cash’, in König, and Whitton, (2018b): 302–29.Google Scholar
Morello, R. and Gibson, R. (eds.) (2003). Re-imagining Pliny the Younger (= Arethusa 36.2). Baltimore.Google Scholar
Morello, R. and Morrison, A.D. (eds.) (2007). Ancient Letters: Classical and Late Antique Epistolography. Oxford.Google Scholar
Moreno Soldevila, R., Castillo, A.M. and Valverde, J.F. (eds.) (2019). A Prosopography of Martial’s Epigrams. Berlin.Google Scholar
Morzadec, F. (2009). Les Images du Monde. Structure, écriture, et esthétique du paysage dans les oeuvres de Stace et Silius Italicus. Brussels.Google Scholar
Mratschek, S. (2003). ‘Illa nostra Italia. Plinius und die “Wiedergeburt” der Literatur in der Transpadana’, in Castagna, and Lefèvre, (2003): 219–41.Google Scholar
Mratschek, S., (2018). ‘Images of Domitius Apollinaris in Pliny and Martial: Intertextual Discourses as Aspects of Self-Definition and Differentiation’, in König, and Whitton, (2018b): 208–32.Google Scholar
Murphy, T. (2004). Pliny the Elder’s Natural History. The Empire in the Encyclopedia. Oxford.Google Scholar
Myers, K.S. (2000). ‘Miranda Fides: Poet and Patrons in Paradoxographical Landscapes in Statius’ Silvae’, MD 44: 103–38.Google Scholar
Myers, K.S., (2005). ‘Docta Otia: Garden Ownership and Configurations of Leisure in Statius and Pliny the Younger’, Arethusa 38: 103–29.Google Scholar
Mynors, R.A.B. (1963). C. Plini Caecili Secundi Epistularum libri decem. Oxford (with corrected reprint, 1968).Google Scholar
Naas, V, (2011). ‘Imperialism, Mirabilia and Knowledge: Some Paradoxes in the Naturalis Historia’, in Gibson, and Morello, (2011): 57–70.Google Scholar
Nauta, R.R. (2002). Poetry for Patrons: Literary Communication in the Age of Domitian. Leiden.Google Scholar
Neger, M. (2012). Martials Dichtergedichte. Das Epigramm als Medium der poetischen Selbstreflexion. Tübingen.Google Scholar
Neger, M., (2015a). ‘Neque enim vereor, ne iactantior videar…: Plinius und der kaiserzeitliche Diskurs über das Selbstlob’, Gymnasium 122: 315–38.Google Scholar
Neger, M., (2015b). ‘Pliny’s Martial and Martial’s Pliny: The Intertextual Dialogue between the Letters and the Epigrams’, in Devillers, (2015a): 131–44.Google Scholar
Neger, M., (2016). ‘Satius est enim otiosum esse quam nihil agere: Die Inszenierung von Mußezeit und Mußeräumen im Briefkorpus des Jüngeren Plinius’, in Eickhoff, F.C. (ed.). Muße und Rekursitivät in der antiken Briefliteratur. Mit einem Ausblick in andere Gattungen. Tübingen: 133–60.Google Scholar
Neger, M., (2018). ‘Telling Tales of Wonder: Mirabilia in the Letters of Pliny the Younger’, in Gerolemou, M. (ed.). Recognizing Miracles in Antiquity and Beyond. Berlin: 179–203.Google Scholar
Neger, M., (2019). ‘Laudabo digne non satis tamen Baias: Martial’s Epigrammatic Campania’, in Augoustakis, A. and Littlewood, J. (eds.). Campania in the Flavian Poetic Imagination. Oxford: 83–98.Google Scholar
Neger, M., (2021). Epistolare Narrationen. Studien zur Erzähltechnik des jüngeren Plinius. Tübingen.Google Scholar
Neudecker, R. (2004). ‘Aspekte öffentlicher Bibliotheken in der Kaiserzeit’, in Borg, B. (ed.). Paideia: the World of the Second Sophistic. Berlin: 293–313.Google Scholar
Neuhausen, K.A. (1968). ‘Plinius proximus Tacito. Bemerkungen zu einem Topos der römischen Literaturkritik’, RhM 111: 333–57.Google Scholar
Newlands, C., (2010). ‘The Eruption of Vesuvius in the Epistles of Statius and Pliny’, in Miller, J.F. and Woodman, A. (eds.). Latin Historiography and Poetry in the Early Empire: Generic Interactions. Leiden: 105–21.Google Scholar
Newlands, C., (2013). ‘Architectural Ecphrasis in Roman Poetry’, in Papanghelis, , Harrison, and Frangoulidis, (2013): 55–78.Google Scholar
Nikitinski, O. (1998). ‘Plinius der Ältere: Seine Enzyklopädie und ihre Leser’, in Kullmann, W., Althoff, J. and Asper, M. (eds.). Gattungen wissenschaftlicher Literatur in der Antike. Tübingen: 341–60.Google Scholar
Nisbet, G. (2003). Greek Epigram in the Roman Empire: Martial’s Forgotten Rivals. Oxford.Google Scholar
Noreña, C.F. (2007). ‘The Social Economy of Pliny’s Correspondence with Trajan’, AJPh 128: 239–77.Google Scholar
Önnerfors, A. (1976). ‘Traumerzählung und Traumtheorie beim Älteren Plinius’, RhM 119: 352–65.Google Scholar
Offermann, H. (1993). ‘Offenheit oder Maskierung: Plinius’, Anregung 39: 83–92, 162–71.Google Scholar
Oliensis, E. (1995). ‘Life After Publication: Horace, Epistles 1.20’, Arethusa 28: 209–26.Google Scholar
Onorato, M. (2020). ‘Velut de quodam speculo formatum: l’intertestualità sidoniana tra teoria e prassi’, in Di Stefano, A. and Onorato, M. (eds.). Lo specchio del modello. Orizzonti intertestuali e Fortleben di Sidonio Apollinare. Naples: 13–53.Google Scholar
O’Rourke, D. and Pelttari, A. (forthcoming). ‘Intertextuality’, in Gibson, R. and Whitton, C. (eds.). The Cambridge Critical Guide to Latin Literature. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Otto, N. (2009). Enargeia. Untersuchungen zur Charakteristik alexandrinischer Dichtung. Stuttgart.Google Scholar
Pagán, V. (2010). ‘The Power of the Epistolary Preface from Statius to Pliny’, CQ 60: 194–201.Google Scholar
Page, S. (2015). Der ideale Aristokrat. Plinius der Jüngere und das Sozialprofil der Senatoren in der Kaiserzeit. Heidelberg.Google Scholar
Papanghelis, T.D., Harrison, S.J. and Frangoulidis, S. (eds.) (2013). Generic Interfaces in Latin Literature. Berlin.Google Scholar
Pausch, D. (2004). Biographie und Bildungskultur. Personendarstellungen bei Plinius dem Jüngeren, Gellius und Sueton. Berlin.Google Scholar
Pavlovskis, Z. (1973). Man in an Artificial Landscape: The Marvels of Civilization in Imperial Roman Literature. Leiden.Google Scholar
Pecere, O. (1990). ‘I meccanismi della tradizione testuale’, in Cavallo, G., Fedeli, P. and Giardina, A. (eds.). Lo spazio letterario di Roma antica, vol. 3: La ricezione del testo. Rome: 297–386.Google Scholar
Pflips, H. (1973). Ciceronachahmung und Ciceroferne des jüngeren Plinius. Ein Kommentar zu den Briefen des Plinius über Repetundenprozesse (epist. 2,11; 2,12; 3,9; 4,9; 5,20; 6,13; 7,6). Dissertation, Münster.Google Scholar
Pitcher, R.A. (1999). ‘The Hole in the Hypothesis: Pliny and Martial Reconsidered’, Mnemosyne 52: 554–61.Google Scholar
Pittà, A. (2015). M. Terenzio Varrone, de vita populi Romani. Introduzione e commento. Pisa.Google Scholar
Power, T. (2010). ‘Pliny, Letters 5.10 and the Literary Career of Suetonius’, JRS 100: 140–62.Google Scholar
Power, T., (2014). ‘Calvus’ Poetry in Suetonius and Pliny, Letters 5.3’, Athenaeum 102: 543–5.Google Scholar
Price, J.J. (2014). ‘A Curious Case: Pliny Does Not Write History (Ep. 5.8)’, SCI 33: 171‒89.Google Scholar
Radicke, J. (2003). ‘Der öffentliche Privatbrief als “kommunizierte Kommunikation” (Plin. Epist. 4,28)’, in Castagna, and Lefèvre, (2003): 23–34.Google Scholar
Ratti, S. (2015). ‘Relire le Satyricon: Pline le Jeune et les chrétiens, cibles du roman secret d’un affranchi cultivé’, Anabases 22: 99–145.Google Scholar
Rémy, B. (1976). ‘Ornati et ornamenta quaestoria, praetoria et consularia sous le haut empire romain’, REA 78–79: 160–98.Google Scholar
Richlin, A. (2003). ‘Gender and Rhetoric: Producing Manhood in the Schools’, in Golden, M. and Toohey, P. (eds.). Sex and Difference in Ancient Rome. Edinburgh: 74–90.Google Scholar
Rieks, R. (1967). Homo, humanus, humanitas: Zur Humanität in der lateinischen Literatur des ersten nachchristlichen Jahrhunderts. Munich.Google Scholar
Riggsby, A.M. (1995). ‘Pliny on Cicero and Oratory: Self-Fashioning in the Public Eye’, AJPh 116: 123–35.Google Scholar
Rocca-Serra, G. (1990). ‘Imitatio Alexandri et stoïcisme: Manilius et Silius Italicus’, in Croisille, J.-M. (ed.). Neronia IV. Alejandro Magno, modelo de los emperadores romanos. Actes du IVe Colloque international de la SIEN. Brussels: 379–87.Google Scholar
Rocchi, S. (2015). ‛Plinius, Brief 8,17: Eine Überschwemmung des Tiber und des Aniene. Text, Textkritik und Intertextualitätʼ, Gymnasium 122: 389–402.Google Scholar
Rocchi, S., (2021). ‘Corinthian Bronzes and Vases from Pliny the Elder to Pliny the Younger (in the Light of a Passage by Cicero)’, in Anguissola, A. and Grüner, A. (eds.). The Nature of Art. Pliny the Elder on Materials. Leiden: 217–23.Google Scholar
Rocchi, S. and Mussini, C. (eds.) (2017). Imagines Antiquitatis. Representations, Concepts, Receptions of the Past in Roman Antiquity and the Early Italian Renaissance. Berlin.Google Scholar
Röcke, W. and Velten, H.R. (eds.) (2005). Lachgemeinschaften: Kulturelle Inszenierungen und soziale Wirkungen von Gelächter im Mittelalter und in der frühen Neuzeit. Berlin.Google Scholar
Rolfe, J.C. (1997–98). Suetonius. Lives of the Caesars. Lives of Illustrious Men, 2 vols. Cambridge, MA (first edition 1914).Google Scholar
Roller, M.B. (1998). ‘Pliny’s Catullus: The Politics of Literary Appropriation’, TAPA 128: 265–304.Google Scholar
Roller, M.B., (2001). Constructing Autocracy: Aristocrats and Emperors in Julio-Claudian Rome. Princeton.Google Scholar
Roller, M.B., (2018). ‘Amicable and Hostile Exchange in the Culture of Recitation’, in König, and Whitton, (2018b): 183–207.Google Scholar
Rosen, R. (2015). ‘Laughter’, in Destrée, P. and Murray, P. (eds.). A Companion to Ancient Aesthetics. Chichester: 455–71.Google Scholar
Rossiter, J.J. (2003). ‘A Shady Business: Building for the Seasons at Pliny’s Villas’, Mouseion 3: 355–62.Google Scholar
Rouse, R.H. and Reeve, M.D. (1983). ‘Cicero / Speeches’, in Reynolds, L.D. (ed.). Texts and Transmission. A Survey of the Latin Classics. Oxford: 54–98.Google Scholar
Rouse, W.H.D. (1924). Lucretius. On the Nature of Things. Revised by M.F. Smith. Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
Rousselle, A. (1992). ‘Body Politics in Ancient Rome’, in Schmitt Pantel, P. (ed.). A History of Women: From Ancient Goddesses to Christian Saints. Cambridge, MA: 297–336.Google Scholar
Rutledge, S.H. (2001). Imperial Inquisitions: Prosecutors and Informants from Tiberius to Domitian. London.Google Scholar
Rutledge, S.H. (2010). ‘Oratory and Politics in the Empire’, in Dominik, W. and Hall, J. (eds.). A Companion to Roman Rhetoric. Oxford: 109–21.Google Scholar
Salles, C. (1981). ‘Assem para et accipe auream fabulam: Quelques remarques sur la littérature populaire et le répertoire des conteurs publics dans le monde romain’, Latomus 40: 3–20.Google Scholar
Saylor, C., (1982). ‘Overlooking Lake Vadimon: Pliny on Tourism (Epist. 8.20)’, CPh 77: 139–44.Google Scholar
Scarcia, R. (1985). ‘Ad tantas opes processit. Note a Plinio il Giovane’, Index 13: 289–312.Google Scholar
Schanz, M. and Hosius, C. (1935). Geschichte der römischen Litteratur bis zum Gesetzgebungswerk des Kaisers Justinian. Zweiter Teil: Die römische Litteratur in der Zeit der Monarchie bis auf Hadrian. Munich (fourth edition).Google Scholar
Scheffer, J. (I. Schefferus) (1675). ‘In C. Plinium Caecilium Secundum notae’, in Schefferus, I.. Lectionum academicarum liber. Hamburg: 59–109.Google Scholar
Schenk, P. (1999). ‘Formen von Intertextualität im Briefkorpus des jüngeren Plinius’, Philologus 143: 114–34.Google Scholar
Schlegel, C.M. (2005). Satire and the Threat of Speech. Horace’s Satires, Book 1. Madison, WI.Google Scholar
Schönberger, O. (1990). ‘Die Vesuv-Briefe des jüngeren Plinius (VI 16 und 20)’, Gymnasium 97: 526–48.Google Scholar
Schröder, B.J. (2001). ‘Literaturkritik oder Fauxpas? – Zu Plin. epist. 6, 15’, Gymnasium 108: 241–7.Google Scholar
Schwartz, J. (1969). ‘Le fantôme de l’Académie’, in Bibauw, J. (ed.). Hommages à M. Renard, vol. 1. Brussels: 671–6.Google Scholar
Schwerdtner, K. (2015). Plinius und seine Klassiker: Studien zur literarischen Zitation in den Pliniusbriefen. Berlin.Google Scholar
Seider, R. (1979). ‛Beiträge zur Geschichte und Paläographie der antiken Cicerohandschriftenʼ, Bibliothek und Wissenschaft 13: 101–49.Google Scholar
Seif, K.P. (1973). Die Claudiusbücher in den Annalen des Tacitus. Dissertation, Mainz.Google Scholar
Setaioli, A. (2016). ‘Ancora sul maximus poetarum (Sen. brev. 2.2)’, in Pieri, B. and Pellacani, D. (eds.). Si verba tenerem: Studi sulla poesia latina in frammenti. Berlin: 149–56.Google Scholar
Shackleton Bailey, D.R., (2003). Statius. Silvae, Thebaid, Achilleid, 3 vols. Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
Shannon, K.E. (2013). ‘Authenticating the Marvellous: Mirabilia in Pliny the Younger, Tacitus, and Suetonius’, Working Papers in Nervan, Trajanic and Hadrianic Literature 1.9 (6/6/13): 1–26.Google Scholar
Shelton, J.-A. (1987). ‘Pliny’s Letter 3.11: Rhetoric and Autobiography’, C&M 38: 121–39.Google Scholar
Sherwin-White, A.N. (1962). ‘Trajan’s Replies to Pliny: Authorship and Necessity’, JRS 52: 114–25.Google Scholar
Sherwin-White, A.N., (1966). The Letters of Pliny. A Historical and Social Commentary. Oxford (with corrected reprint, 1985, 1998).Google Scholar
Sinclair, B.W. (1980). Valerius Maximus and the Evolution of Silver Latin, Dissertation, University of Cincinatti.Google Scholar
Spahlinger, L. (2005). Tulliana simplicitas. Zur Form und Funktion des Zitats in den philosophischen Dialogen Ciceros. Göttingen.Google Scholar
Stadter, P.A. (2006). ‘Pliny and the Ideology of Empire: The Correspondence with Trajan’, Prometheus 32: 61–76.Google Scholar
Stärk, E. (1995). Kampanien als geistige Landschaft. Interpretationen zum antiken Bild des Golfs von Neapel. Munich.Google Scholar
Stebbins, E. (1929). The Dolphin in the Literature and Art of Greece and Rome. Menasha, WI.Google Scholar
Steel, C.E.W., (2014). ‘The Roman Senate and the Post-Sullan Res Publica’, Historia 63: 323–39.Google Scholar
Stefani, G. (2011). ‘Das Datum des Vesuvausbruchs 79 n. Chr.’, in Meller, H. and Dickmann, J.-A. (eds.). Pompeji – Nola – Herculaneum: Katastrophen am Vesuv. Munich: 81–4.Google Scholar
Stevens, B. (2009). ‘Pliny and the Dolphin – or a Story about Storytelling’, Arethusa 42: 161–79.Google Scholar
Stoffel, C. (2017). ‘otium Campanum – Silius im Ruhestand (Plin. epist. 3,7), Hannibal in Capua (Sil. 11)’, Hermes 145: 375–85.Google Scholar
Storchi Marino, A. (1995). ‘Tra fonti documentarie e letteratura: il caso di Pallante da insolens a sublimatus’, in Cerasuolo, S. (ed.). Mathesis e philia. Studi in onore di Marcello Gigante. Naples: 187–214.Google Scholar
Strunk, T.E., (2013). ‘Domitian’s Lightning Bolts and Close Shaves in Pliny’, CJ 109: 88–113.Google Scholar
Stucchi, S. (2015). ‘Lutto, dolore e dignitas in Plinio il Giovane’, in Devillers, (2015a): 183–96.Google Scholar
Sullivan, J.P. (1991). Martial: The Unexpected Classic. A Literary and Historical Study. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Summerson Carr, E. (2010). ‘Enactments of Expertise’, Annual Review of Anthropology 39: 17–32.Google Scholar
Tamás, Á. (2020). ‘The Art of Framing. Pliny the Younger, Epistles 4.27’, in Hegyi, P. (ed.). Tradition and Innovation in Literature. From Antiquity to the Present. Budapest: 29–44.Google Scholar
Thomas, R., (1999) Reading Virgil and his Texts: Studies in Intertextuality. Ann ArborGoogle Scholar
Thomson, D.F.S. (1997). Catullus, Edited with a Textual and Interpretative Commentary. Toronto.Google Scholar
Thorsteinsson, R. (2003). Paul’s Interlocutor in Romans 2. Function and Identity in the Context of Ancient Epistolography. Stockholm (reprint: 2015, Eugene, OR).Google Scholar
Tischer, U. (2010). ‘Aspekte des Zitats. Überlegungen zur Anwendung eines modernen Konzepts auf antike lateinische Texte’, in Tischer, U. and Binternagel, A. (eds.). Fremde Rede – Eigene Rede. Zitieren und verwandte Strategien in antiker Prosa, Frankfurt am Main: 93–109.Google Scholar
Tischer, U., (2018). Zitat und Markierung. Signalisieren und Erfassen von Zitaten in römischer Prosa. Habilitation treatise, Univ. Potsdam.Google Scholar
Tischer, U., (2019). ‘Quotations in Roman Prose as Intermedial Phenomena’, in Dinter, and Reitz-Joosse, (2019): 34–50.Google Scholar
Torelli, M. (2017). ‘The Etruscan Legacy’, in Naso, A. (ed.). Etruscology, vol. 1. Berlin: 685–720.Google Scholar
Traub, H.W. (1955). ‘Pliny’s Treatment of History in Epistolary Form’, TAPA 86: 213–32.Google Scholar
Trinacty, C.V. (2020). ‘Answering the Natural Questions: Pliny’s Ep. 4.30 and Ep. 8.20’, CJ 116: 82‒99.Google Scholar
Trisoglio, F. (1972). La personalità di Plinio il Giovane nei suoi rapporti con la politica, la società e la letteratura. Turin.Google Scholar
Tueller, M.A. (2008). Look Who’s Talking: Innovations in Voice and Identity in Hellenistic Epigram. Leuven.Google Scholar
Tyrrell, R.Y. and Purser, L.C. (1918). The Correspondence of M. Tullius Cicero, vol. 4. Dublin (second edition).Google Scholar
Tzounakas, S. (2007). ‘Neque enim historiam componebam: Pliny’s First Epistle and his Attitude towards Historiography’, MH 64: 42–54.Google Scholar
Tzounakas, S., (2011). ‘Seneca’s Presence in Pliny’s Epistle 1.12’, Philologus 155: 346–60.Google Scholar
Tzounakas, S., (2015). ‘Pliny as the Roman Demosthenes’, in Devillers, (2015a): 207–18.Google Scholar
Urban, R. (1979). ‘Tacitus und die Res gestae divi Augusti. Die Auseinandersetzung des Historikers mit der offiziellen Darstellung’, Gymnasium 86: 59–74.Google Scholar
Ussani, V. (1971). ‘Leggendo Plinio il Giovane, II. Oratio – historia’, RCCM 13: 70–135.Google Scholar
Van den Berg, C. (2014). ‘Intratext, Declamation and Dramatic Argument in Tacitus’ Dialogus de oratoribus’, CQ 64: 298–315.Google Scholar
Van der Blom, H. (2010). Cicero’s Role Models: The Political Strategy of a Newcomer. Oxford.Google Scholar
Van Hooff, A.J.L. (1990). From Autothanasia to Suicide: Self-killing in Classical Antiquity. London.Google Scholar
Vasaly, A. (2009). ‘Domestic Politics and the First Action of the Verrines’, ClAnt 28: 101–37.Google Scholar
Vessey, D.W.T.C. (1971). ‘Thoughts on Tacitus’ Portrayal of Claudius’, AJPh 92: 385–409.Google Scholar
Vince, C.A. and Vince, J.H. (1926). Demosthenes, Orations 18–19: De Corona, De Falsa Legatione. Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
von Baumhauer, M.M. (1842). Περὶ τῆς εὐλόγου ἐξαγωγῆς. Veterum philosophorum praecipue Stoicorum doctrina de morte voluntaria. Dissertation, Trier.Google Scholar
Wallace-Hadrill, A., (1990). ‘Pliny the Elder and Man’s Unnatural History’, G&R 37: 80–96.Google Scholar
Walsh, P.G. (ed.) (2006). Pliny the Younger: Complete Letters. Translated with an Introduction and Notes. Oxford.Google Scholar
Wankel, H. (1976). Demosthenes, Rede für Ktesiphon über den Kranz, 2 vols. Heidelberg.Google Scholar
Watson, G. (1994). ‘The Concept of “Phantasia” from the Late Hellenistic Period to Early Neoplatonism’, ANRW II.36.7: 4765–810.Google Scholar
Watson, L. (1990). ‘Rustic Suffenus (Catullus 22) and Literary Rusticity’, PLLS 6: 13–33.Google Scholar
Webb, R. (2009). Ekphrasis, Imagination and Persuasion in Ancient Rhetorical Theory and Practice, Farnham.Google Scholar
Weilbach, C. (2020). Wie Laien und Fachleute über Medizinisches sprechen. Ein Vergleich medizinischer Äußerungen in Briefen und Fachtexten aus der Zeit der späten römischen Republik bis in die frühe Kaiserzeit, Heidelberg.Google Scholar
Welch, T.S. (2001). ‘Est locus uni cuique suus: City and Status in Horace’s Satires 1.8 and 1.9’, ClAnt 20: 165–92.Google Scholar
Wenskus, O. (1993). ‘Zitatzwang als Motiv für Codewechsel in der lateinischen Prosa’, Glotta 71: 205–16.Google Scholar
White, P. (1975). ‘The Friends of Martial, Statius, and Pliny, and the Dispersal of Patronage’, HSPh 79: 265–300.Google Scholar
Whitton, C.L. (2010). ‘Pliny, Epistles 8.14: Senate, Slavery and the Agricola’, JRS 100: 118–39.Google Scholar
Whitton, C.L., (2012). ‘“Let us Tread our Path Together”: Tacitus and the Younger Pliny’, in Pagán, V.E. (ed.). A Companion to Tacitus. Malden, MA: 345–68.Google Scholar
Whitton, C.L., (2013b). ‘Trapdoors: The Falsity of Closure in Pliny’s Epistles’, in Grewing, F., Acosta-Hughes, B. and Kirichenko, A. (eds.). The Door Ajar: False Closure in Greek and Roman Literature and Art. Heidelberg: 43–61.Google Scholar
Whitton, C.L., (2014). ‘Minerva on the Surrey Downs: Reading Pliny (and Horace) with John Toland’, CCJ 60: 127–57.Google Scholar
Whitton, C.L., (2015a). ‘Grand Designs: Unrolling Epistles 2’, in Marchesi, (2015a): 109–43.Google Scholar
Whitton, C.L., (2015b). ‘Pliny on the Precipice (Ep., 9.26)’, in Devillers, (2015a): 219–37.Google Scholar
Whitton, C.L., (2015c). ‘Pliny’s Progress: On a Troublesome Domitianic Career’, Chiron 45: 1–22.Google Scholar
Whitton, C.L., (2018). ‘Quintilian, Pliny, Tacitus’, in König, and Whitton, (2018b): 37–62.Google Scholar
Whitton, C.L., (2019). The Arts of Imitation in Latin Prose. Pliny’s Epistles / Quintilian in Brief. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Whitton, C.L., (forthcoming). Tacitus Revoiced. Reading the Histories with Pliny the Younger.Google Scholar
Whitton, C.L. and Gibson, R.K. (2016). ‘Readers and Readings of Pliny’s Epistles’, in Gibson, and Whitton, (2016): 1–48.Google Scholar
Williams, C.A., (2013). ‘When a Dolphin Loves a Boy: Some Graeco-Roman and Native American Love Stories’, ClAnt 32: 200–42.Google Scholar
Williams, G.D., (2014). ‘On the Shortness of Life’, in E. Fantham, H.M. Hine, J. Ker and G.D. Williams (trans.). Seneca: Hardship and Happiness. Chicago: 105–39.Google Scholar
Williams, W. (1990). Pliny: Correspondence with Trajan from Bithynia (Epistles X); Translated, with Introduction and Commentary. Warminster.Google Scholar
Wilson, M. (1997). ‘The Subjugation of Grief in Seneca’s Epistles’, in Braund, S.M. and Gill, C. (eds.). The Passions in Roman Thought and Literature. Cambridge: 48–67.Google Scholar
Winniczuk, L. (1975). ‘The Ending Phrases in Pliny’s “Letters” (Contribution to the Epistolography)’, Eos 63: 319–28.Google Scholar
Wolff, É. (2003). Pline le Jeune ou Le refus du pessimisme: Essai sur sa correspondance. Rennes.Google Scholar
Woodman, A.J., (1998). ‘Review of D.S. Potter, Literary Text and the Roman Historian’, Histos 2: 308–16.Google Scholar
Woodman, A.J., (2012). ‘Pliny on Writing History: Epistles 5.8’, in Woodman, A.J. (ed.). From Poetry to History: Selected Papers. Oxford: 223–42.Google Scholar
Woolf, G. (1998). Becoming Roman: The Origins of Provincial Civilization in Gaul. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Woolf, G., (2006). ‘Pliny’s Province’, in Bekker-Nielsen, T. (ed.). Rome and the Black Sea Region: Domination, Romanisation, Resistance. Åarhus: 93–108 (= in Gibson, and Whitton, 2016: 442–60).Google Scholar
Worthington, I. (2013). Demosthenes of Athens and the Fall of Classical Greece. Oxford.Google Scholar
Wray, D. (2007). ‘Wood: Statius’ Silvae and the Poetics of Genius’, Arethusa 40: 127–43.Google Scholar
Zeiner, N. (2005). Nothing Ordinary Here: Statius as Creator of Distinction in the Silvae. London.Google Scholar
Zerbini, L. (2006). ‘Il piacere di vivere in villa: testimonianze letterarie’, in Ortalli, J. (ed.). Vivere in villa: le qualità delle residenze agresti in età romana. Florence: 11–18.Google Scholar