Book contents
- International Perspectives on End-of-Life Law Reform
- Cambridge Bioethics and Law
- International Perspectives on End-of-Life Law Reform
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Preface
- About the Editors
- List of Contributors
- Table of Cases
- Table of Statutes, Bills and Regulations
- 1 End-of-Life Law Reform
- 2 The Path from Rodriguez to Bill C-14 and Beyond
- 3 The Extension of the Belgian Euthanasia Law to Minors in 2014
- 4 The Role of Scientific Evaluations of the Dutch Termination of Life on Request and Assisted Suicide (Review Procedure) Act
- 5 The Challenging Path to Voluntary Assisted Dying Law Reform in Australia
- 6 Should Assisted Dying Require the Consent of a High Court Judge?
- 7 Aid in Dying in the United States
- 8 The Medical Regulator as Law Reformer
- 9 Extrajudicial Resolution of Medical Futility Disputes
- 10 Challenging Mandatory Court Hearings for People in Vegetative and Minimally Conscious States
- 11 Withholding and Withdrawing Life-Prolonging Treatment and the Relevance of Patients’ Wishes
- 12 International Perspectives on Reforming End-of-Life Law
- Index
11 - Withholding and Withdrawing Life-Prolonging Treatment and the Relevance of Patients’ Wishes
Reforming the Mental Capacity Act 2005
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 02 December 2021
- International Perspectives on End-of-Life Law Reform
- Cambridge Bioethics and Law
- International Perspectives on End-of-Life Law Reform
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Preface
- About the Editors
- List of Contributors
- Table of Cases
- Table of Statutes, Bills and Regulations
- 1 End-of-Life Law Reform
- 2 The Path from Rodriguez to Bill C-14 and Beyond
- 3 The Extension of the Belgian Euthanasia Law to Minors in 2014
- 4 The Role of Scientific Evaluations of the Dutch Termination of Life on Request and Assisted Suicide (Review Procedure) Act
- 5 The Challenging Path to Voluntary Assisted Dying Law Reform in Australia
- 6 Should Assisted Dying Require the Consent of a High Court Judge?
- 7 Aid in Dying in the United States
- 8 The Medical Regulator as Law Reformer
- 9 Extrajudicial Resolution of Medical Futility Disputes
- 10 Challenging Mandatory Court Hearings for People in Vegetative and Minimally Conscious States
- 11 Withholding and Withdrawing Life-Prolonging Treatment and the Relevance of Patients’ Wishes
- 12 International Perspectives on Reforming End-of-Life Law
- Index
Summary
In the UK, decisions taken on behalf of patients who lack capacity must be in their best interests, but the meaning of ‘best interests’ has evolved. The Mental Capacity Act 2005 codified the law relating to adults who lack capacity, offering a checklist of factors relevant to best interests assessment, including the person’s ‘past and present wishes and feelings’ and the ‘beliefs and values that would be likely to influence’ their decisions. Since 2013, the courts have gone further and, in some circumstances, seem to treat the patient’s wishes as the decisive factor. Now, a gap exists between what the statute says and its judicial interpretation. Doctors seeking guidance on how to weigh the patient’s own wishes when making a best interests decision will receive divergent advice from the legislation, guidance from the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE), and the law reports. This chapter suggests this discrepancy is unnecessarily confusing for health care professionals, patients and their families. If there is, or should be, a rebuttable presumption in favour of making the patient’s wishes decisive, the law would preferably state this clearly and unequivocally.
Keywords
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- International Perspectives on End-of-Life Law ReformPolitics, Persuasion and Persistence, pp. 232 - 249Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2021