Book contents
- International Law in Public Debate
- International Law in Public Debate
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Foreword
- Acknowledgements
- 1 International Law in Public Debate
- 2 A ‘Popular’ International Law
- 3 Public Debate in 2003: The Iraq War
- 4 Public Debate in 1965–66: The Vietnam War
- 5 Public Debate in 1916: The First World War
- 6 Conclusion
- Bibliography
- Index
5 - Public Debate in 1916: The First World War
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 30 November 2021
- International Law in Public Debate
- International Law in Public Debate
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Foreword
- Acknowledgements
- 1 International Law in Public Debate
- 2 A ‘Popular’ International Law
- 3 Public Debate in 2003: The Iraq War
- 4 Public Debate in 1965–66: The Vietnam War
- 5 Public Debate in 1916: The First World War
- 6 Conclusion
- Bibliography
- Index
Summary
In chapter 5, I describe how participants in the 1916 debates used the law of nations as it existed at the time, and the dominion and constitutional law of the British Empire to deliberate the justifications for war and for conscription. The languages of these debates included, for example, arguments about the preservation of White Australia, about the need to protect Australians’ civil liberties, and about the unequal claims made on the different classes of Australian society as a result of the First World War. The persuasiveness of uses of international legal language in 1916 depended on speakers’ abilities to navigate the complications of Australia’s colonial nationalism. Speakers made sophisticated arguments about the duties of the Dominion of Australia to the British Empire on the one hand, and to its own emerging nationhood on the other.
Keywords
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- International Law in Public Debate , pp. 134 - 173Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2021