Abdala (2008): Abdala, Manuel A, Spiller, Pablo T, ‘Chorzów’s Standard Rejuvenated: Assessing Damages in Investment Treaty Arbitrations’ 25 Journal of International Arbitration (2008) 103–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Akehurst (1977a): Akehurst, Michael, ‘Custom as a Source of International Law’ 47 British Year Book of International Law 1974–75 (1977) 1–53.Google Scholar

Akehurst (1977b): Akehurst, Michael, ‘The Hierarchy of the Sources of International Law’ 47 British Year Book of International Law 1974–75 (1977) 273–85.Google Scholar

Al Faruque (2004): Al Faruque, Abdullah, ‘Creating Customary International Law through Bilateral Investment Treaties: A Critical Appraisal’ 44 Indian Journal of International Law (2004) 292–318.Google Scholar

Algero (2005): Algero, Mary Garvey, ‘The Sources of Law and the Value of Precedent: A Comparative and Empirical Study of a Civil Law State in a Common Law Nation; 65 Louisiana Law Review (2005) 775–822.Google Scholar

Al-Mukhaizeem (2016): Al-Mukhaizeem, Bashayer, ‘The Dilemma of Indirect Expropriation of Host States and the Right to Regulate in the International Investment Sphere’ 4:2 Legal Issues Journal (2016) 1–23.Google Scholar

Allot (1999): Allott, Philip, ‘The Concept of International Law’ 10 European Journal of International Law (1999) 31–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Alvarez (2009): Alvarez, José E, ‘A BIT on Custom’ 42 New York University Journal of International Law and Politics (2009) 17–80.Google Scholar

Alvarez (2016): Alvarez, José E, ‘“Beware: Boundary Crossings” – A Critical Appraisal of Public Law Approaches to International Investment Law’ 17 Journal of World Investment & Trade (2016) 171–228.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Appleton (2002–3): Appleton, Barry, ‘Regulatory Takings: The International Law Perspective’ 11 New York University Environmental Law Journal (2002–3) 35–48.Google Scholar

Ascensio (2016): Ascensio, Hervé, ‘Article 31 of the Vienna Conventions on the Law of Treaties and International Investment Law’ 31 ICSID Review (2016) 366–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Asteriti (2014): Asteriti, Alessandra, ‘Regulatory Expropriation Claims in International Investment Arbitrations: A Bridge Too Far?’ in Bjorklund, Andrea K (ed.), Yearbook on International Investment Law and Policy 2012–2013 (Oxford: Oxford University Press 2014) 451–73.Google Scholar

Auerbach (1900): Auerbach, Paul, Dispositives Recht insbesondere des BGB (Frankfurt: Mahlau & Waldschmidt 1900).Google Scholar

Austin (1962): Austin, John L, How to Do Things with Words: The William James Lectures Delivered at Harvard University in 1955 (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press 1962).Google Scholar

Bankowski (1997): Bankowski, Zenon, MacCormick, D Neil, ‘Precedent in the United Kingdom’ in MacCormick, D Neil, Summers, Robert S (eds.), Interpreting Precedents: A Comparative Study (Aldershot: Ashgate 1997) 315–54.Google Scholar

Banks (1999): Banks, Kevin, ‘NAFTA’s Article 1110: Can Regulation Be Expropriation?’ 5 NAFTA: Law and Business Review of the Americas (1999) 499–521.Google Scholar

Bartels (2011): Bartels, Lorand, ‘Jurisdiction and Applicable Law Clauses: Where Does a Tribunal Find the Principal Norms Applicable to the Case before It?’ in Broude, Tomer, Shani, Yuval (eds.), Multi-sourced Equivalent Norms in International Law (Oxford: Hart 2011) 115–41.Google Scholar

Baughen (2006): Baughen, Simon, ‘Expropriation and Environmental Regulation: The Lessons of NAFTA Chapter 11’ 18 Journal of Environmental Law (2006) 207–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Baxter (1968): Baxter, Richard R, ‘Multilateral Treaties as Evidence of Customary International Law’ 41 British Year Book of International Law 1965–66 (1968) 275–300.Google Scholar

Baxter (1971): Baxter, Richard R, ‘Treaties and Custom’ 129 Recueil des Cours (1971) 25–106.Google Scholar

Beauvais (2001–2): Beauvais, Joel C, ‘Regulatory Expropriations under NAFTA: Emerging Principles and Lingering Doubts’ 10 New York University Environmental Law Journal (2001–2) 245–96.Google Scholar

Been (2003): Been, Vicki, Beauvais, Joel C, ‘The Global Fifth Amendment? NAFTA’s Investment Protections and the Misguided Quest for an International “Regulatory Takings” Doctrine’ 78 New York University Law Review (2003) 30–143.Google Scholar

Behrend (1977): Behrend, Jürgen, Untersuchungen zur Stufenbaulehre Adolf Merkls und Hans Kelsens (Berlin: Duncker & Humblot 1977).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bernhardt (1963): Bernhardt, Rudolf, Die Auslegung völkerrechtlicher Verträge insbesondere in der neueren Rechtsprechung internationaler Gerichte (Berlin: Duncker & Humblot 1963).Google Scholar

Bernhardt (1995): Bernhardt, Rudolf, ‘Interpretation in International Law’ in Bernhardt, Rudolf (ed.), Encyclopedia of Public International Law, vol 2 (Amsterdam: Elsevier 1995) 1416–26.Google Scholar

Bernhardt (2006): Bernhardt, Rudolf, ‘Article 59’ in Zimmermann, Andreas, Tomuschat, Christian, Oellers-Frahm, Karin (eds.), The Statute of the International Court of Justice (Oxford: Oxford University Press 2006) 1231–51.Google Scholar

Binder (1920): Binder, Julius, ‘Der Wissenschaftscharakter der Rechtswissenschaft’ 25 Kant-Studien (1920) 321–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bindschedler (1950): Bindschedler, Rudolf L, Verstaatlichungsmaßnahmen und Entschädigungspflicht nach Völkerrecht unter besonderer Berücksichtigung der schweizerischen Praxis über den Schutz schweizerischer Vermögenswerte im Ausland (Zurich: Polygraphischer Verlag 1950).Google Scholar

Birke (1960): Birke, Wolfgang, Die Konfiskation ausländischen Privatvermögens im Hoheitsbereich des konfiszierenden Staates nach Friedensvölkerrecht (PhD thesis, University of Cologne 1960).Google Scholar

Bishop (2005): Bishop, R Doak, Crawford, James, Reisman, W Michael, Foreign Investment Disputes: Cases, Materials and Commentary (The Hague: Kluwer 2005).Google Scholar

Bjorklund (2008): Bjorklund, Andrea K, ‘Investment Treaty Arbitral Decisions as Jurisprudence Constante’ in Picker, Colin B, Bunn, Isabella D, Arner, Douglas W (eds.), International Economic Law: The State and Future of the Discipline (Oxford: Hart 2008) 265–80.Google Scholar

Bleckmann (1976): Bleckmann, Albert, ‘Völkergewohnheitsrecht trotz widersprüchlicher Praxis?’ 36 Zeitschrift für ausländisches öffentliches Recht und Völkerrecht (1976) 374–405.Google Scholar

Bluntschli (1868): Bluntschli, Johann Caspar, Das moderne Völkerrecht der civilisirten Staaten als Rechtsbuch dargestellt (Nördlingen: CH Beck 1868).Google Scholar

Bodansky (2015): Bodansky, Daniel, ‘Legal Realism and Its Discontents’ 28 Leiden Journal of International Law (2015) 267–81.Google Scholar

Bonnitcha (2014): Bonnitcha, Jonathan, Substantive Protection under Investment Treaties: A Legal and Economic Analysis (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press 2014).Google Scholar

Bos (1980): Bos, Maarten, ‘Theory and Practice of Treaty Interpretation’ 27 Netherlands International Law Review (1980) 3–38, 135–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bos (1982): Bos, Maarten, ‘The Identification of Custom in International Law’ 25 German Yearbook of International Law (1982) 9–53.Google Scholar

Bowett (1988): Bowett, Derek William, ‘State Contracts with Aliens: Contemporary Developments on Compensation for Termination or Breach’ 59 British Year Book of International Law (1988) 49–74.Google Scholar

Bray (2012): Bray, A Devin, ‘Non-compensatory versus Compensatory Takings under NAFTA’ 9:7 Transnational Dispute Management (2012).Google Scholar

Brie (1899): Brie, Siegfried, Die Lehre vom Gewohnheitsrecht: Eine historisch-dogmatische Untersuchung (Breslau: Marcus 1899).Google Scholar

Brierly (1955): Brierly, James L, The Law of Nations: An Introduction to the International Law of Peace (5th edn, Oxford: Clarendon Press 1955).Google Scholar

Brower (1998): Brower, Charles N, Brueschke, Jason D, The Iran–United States Claims Tribunal (The Hague: Martinus Nijhoff 1998).Google Scholar

Brunetti (2003): Brunetti, Maurizio, ‘Introduction [Indirect Expropriation in International Law]’ 5 International Law Forum (2003) 150–4.Google Scholar

Bullington (1927): Bullington, John P, ‘Problems of International Law in the Mexican Constitution of 1917’ 21 American Journal of International Law (1927) 685–705.Google Scholar

Burke-White (2008): Burke-White, William W, von Staden, Andreas, ‘Investment Protection in Extraordinary Times: The Interpretation and Application of Non-precluded Measures Provisions in Bilateral Investment Treaties’ 48 Virginia Journal of International Law (2008) 307–410.Google Scholar

Busse (1993): Busse, Dietrich, Juristische Semantik: Grundfragen der juristischen Interpretationstheorie in sprachwissenschaftlicher Sicht (Berlin: Duncker & Humblot 1993).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Byers (1999): Byers, Michael, Custom, Power and the Power of Rules: International Relations and Customary International Law (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press 1999).Google Scholar

Charney (1986): Charney, Jonathan I, ‘International Agreements and the Development of Customary International Law’ 61 Washington Law Review (1986) 971–95.Google Scholar

Cheng (1983): Cheng, Bin, ‘Custom: The Future of General State Practice in a Divided World’ in Macdonald, Ronald St John, Johnston, Douglas M (eds.), The Structure and Process of International Law: Essays in Legal Philosophy Doctrine and Theory (The Hague: Martinus Nijhoff 1983) 513–54.Google Scholar

Cheng (2007): Cheng, Tai-Heng, ‘Precedent and Control in Investment Treaty Arbitration’ 30 Fordham International Law Journal (2007) 1014–49.Google Scholar

Christie (1964): Christie, GC, ‘What Constitutes a Taking of Property under International Law?’ 38 British Year Book of International Law 1962 (1964) 307–38.Google Scholar

Clough (2005): Clough, Daniel, ‘Regulatory Expropriations and Competition under NAFTA’ 6 Journal of World Investment & Trade (2005) 553–84.Google Scholar

Coe (2005): Coe, Jack Jr, Rubins, Noah, ‘Regulatory Expropriation and the Tecmed Case: Context and Contributions’ in Weiler, Todd (ed.), International Investment Law and Arbitration: Leading Cases from the ICSID, NAFTA, Bilateral Treaties and Customary International Law (London: Cameron May 2005) 597–667.Google Scholar

Collins (2014): Collins, Richard, ‘Classical Legal Positivism in International Law Revisited’ in Kammerhofer, Jörg, d’Aspremont, Jean (eds.), International Legal Positivism in a Post-Modern World (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press 2014) 23–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Comeaux (1997): Comeaux, Paul E, Kinsella, N Stephan, Protecting Foreign Investment under International Law (Dobbs Ferry: Oceana 1997).Google Scholar

Commission (2007): Commission, Jeffery P, ‘Precedent in Investment Treaty Arbitration: A Citation Analysis of a Developing Jurisprudence’ 24 Journal of International Arbitration (2007) 129–58.Google Scholar

Crawford (2008): Crawford, James, ‘Similarity of Issues in Disputes Arising under the Same or Similarly Drafted Investment Treaties’ in Banifatemi, Yas (ed.), Precedent in International Arbitration: IAI Seminar Paris – December 14, 2007 (New York: Juris 2008) 97–103.Google Scholar

Crawford (2012): Crawford, James, Brownlie’s Principles of Public International Law (8th edn, Oxford: Oxford University Press 2012).Google Scholar

D’Amato (1971): D’Amato, Anthony A, The Concept of Custom in International Law (Ithaca: Cornell University Press 1971).Google Scholar

d’Aspremont (2011): d’Aspremont, Jean, Formalism and the Sources of International Law: A Theory of the Ascertainment of Legal Rules (Oxford: Oxford University Press 2011).Google Scholar

d’Aspremont (2012): d’Aspremont, Jean, ‘International Customary Investment Law: Story of a Paradox’ in Gazzini, Tarcisio, De Brabandere, Eric (eds.), International Investment Law: The Sources of Rights and Obligations (Leiden: Martinus Nijhoff 2012) 5–47.Google Scholar

d’Aspremont (2015): d’Aspremont, Jean, ‘If International Judges Say So, It Must Be True: Empiricism or Fetishism?’ 4:9 ESIL Reflections (2015).Google Scholar

d’Aspremont (2017): d’Aspremont, Jean, ‘The International Court of Justice and the Irony of System-Design’ 18 Journal of International Dispute Settlement (2017) 366–87.Google Scholar

d’Aspremont (2018): d’Aspremont, Jean, International Law as a Belief System (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press 2018).Google Scholar

Dalhuisen (2013): Hendrik Dalhuisen, Jan H, Guzman, Andrew T, ‘Expropriatory and Non-expropriatory Takings under International Investment Law’ 10:4 Transnational Dispute Management (2013).Google Scholar

Dahm (1958): Dahm, Georg, Völkerrecht, vol 1 (Stuttgart: W Kohlhammer 1958).Google Scholar

Danilenko (1988): Danilenko, Gennady M, ‘The Theory of International Customary Law’ 31 German Yearbook of International Law (1988) 9–47.Google Scholar

Dinstein (2002): Dinstein, Yoram, ‘Deprivation of Property of Foreigners under International Law’ in Ando, Nisuke, McWhinney, Edward, Wolfrum, Rüdiger (eds.), Liber Amicorum Judge Shigeru Oda, vol 2 (The Hague: Kluwer 2002) 849–69.Google Scholar

Dinstein (2007): Dinstein, Yoram, ‘The Interaction between Customary International Law and Treaties’ 322 Recueil des Cours 2006 (2007) 243–428.Google Scholar

Djeffal (2016): Djeffal, Christian, Static and Evolutive Treaty Interpretation: A Functional Reconstruction (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press 2016).Google Scholar

Doehring (1976): Doehring, Karl, ‘Gewohnheitsrecht aus Verträgen’ 36 Zeitschrift für ausländisches öffentliches Recht und Völkerrecht (1976) 77–95.Google Scholar

Dolzer (1985): Dolzer, Rudolf, Eigentum, Enteignung und Entschädigung im geltenden Völkerrecht (Berlin: Springer 1985).Google Scholar

Dolzer (1986): Dolzer, Rudolf, ‘Indirect Expropriation of Alien Property’ 1 ICSID Review – Foreign Investment Law Journal (1986) 41–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Dolzer (1995): Dolzer, Rudolf, Stevens, Margrete, Bilateral Investment Treaties (The Hague: Martinus Nijhoff 1995).Google Scholar

Dolzer (2002–3): Dolzer, Rudolf, ‘Indirect Expropriations: New Developments?’ 11 New York University Environment Law Journal (2002–3) 64–92.Google Scholar

Dolzer (2012): Dolzer, Rudolf, Schreuer, Christoph, Principles of International Investment Law (2nd edn, Oxford: Oxford University Press 2012).Google Scholar

Dolzer (2015): Dolzer, Rudolf, ‘Case Comment: ConocoPhillips v Venezuela and Gold Reserve v Venezuela: Expropriation: A New Focus on Old Issues’ 30 ICSID Review (2015) 378–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Douglas (2010): Douglas, Zachary, ‘The MFN Clause in Investment Arbitration: Treaty Interpretation Off the Rails’ 2 Journal of International Dispute Settlement (2010) 97–113.Google Scholar

Dreier (2007): Dreier, Horst, ‘Hans Kelsens Wissenschaftsprogramm’ in Schulze-Fielitz, Helmuth (ed.), Staatsrechtslehre als Wissenschaft (Berlin: Duncker & Humblot 2007).Google Scholar

Dugard (2007): Dugard, John, ‘The Future of International Law: A Human Rights Perspective – With Some Comments on the Leiden School of International Law’ 20 Leiden Journal of International Law (2007) 729–39.Google Scholar

Dumberry (2010): Dumberry, Patrick, ‘Are BITs Representing the “New” Customary International Law in International Investment Law?’ 28 Penn State International Law Review (2010) 675–701.Google Scholar

Dumberry (2016): Dumberry, Patrick, The Formation and Identification of Rules of Customary International Law in International Investment Law (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press 2016).Google Scholar

ECS (2012): Energy Charter Secretariat, Expropriation Regime under the Energy Charter Treaty (Brussels: Energy Charter Secretariat 2012).Google Scholar

Elcombe (2010): Elcombe, Joshua, ‘Regulatory Powers vs. Investment Protection under NAFTA’s Chapter 1110: Metalclad, Methanex, and Glamis Gold’ 68 University of Toronto Faculty of Law Review (2010) 71–98.Google Scholar

Ephrussi (1924): Ephrussi, Elisabeth, ‘Interpretation und Analogie’ 4 Zeitschrift für öffentliches Recht (1924) 132–59.Google Scholar

Fitzmaurice (1952): Fitzmaurice, Gerald G, ‘The Law and Procedure of the International Court of Justice: Treaty Interpretation and Certain Other Treaty Points’ 28 British Year Book of International Law 1951 (1952) 1–28.Google Scholar

Fitzmaurice (1958): Fitzmaurice, Gerald G, ‘The Law and Procedure of the International Court of Justice 1951–4: Treaty Interpretation and Other Treaty Points’ 33 British Year Book of International Law 1957 (1958) 203–93.Google Scholar

Fitzmaurice (2010): Fitzmaurice, Malgosia, Merkouris, Panos, ‘Canons of Treaty Interpretation: Selected Case Studies from the World Trade Organization and the North American Free Trade Agreement’ in Fitzmaurice, Malgosia, Elias, Olufemi, Merkouris, Panos (eds.), Treaty Interpretation and the Vienna Convention on the Law of Treaties: 30 Years On (Leiden: Martinus Nijhoff 2010) 153–237.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Fortier (2004): Fortier, L Yves, Drymer, Stephen L, ‘Indirect Expropriation in the Law of International Investment: I Know It When I See It, or Caveat Investor’ 19 ICSID Review – Foreign Investment Law Journal (2004) 293–327.Google Scholar

French (2006): French, Duncan, ‘Treaty Interpretation and the Incorporation of Extraneous Legal Rules’ 55 International and Comparative Law Quarterly (2006) 281–314.Google Scholar

Friedman (1953): Friedman, Samy, Expropriation in International Law (London: Stevens & Sons 1953).Google Scholar

Gaffney (2007): Gaffney, John, Loftis, James, ‘The “Effective Ordinary Meaning” of BITs and the Jurisdiction of Treaty-Based Tribunals to Hear Contract Claims’ 8 Journal of World Investment & Trade (2007) 5–68.Google Scholar

Gardiner (2008): Gardiner, Richard, Treaty Interpretation (Oxford: Oxford University Press 2008).Google Scholar

Gardner (1935): Gardner, John C, ‘Judicial Precedent in the Making of International Public Law’ 18 Journal of Comparative Legislation and International Law (1935) 251–9.Google Scholar

Gazzini (2007): Gazzini, Tarcisio, ‘The Role of Customary International Law in the Field of Foreign Investment’ 8 Journal of World Investment & Trade (2007) 691–716.Google Scholar

Gazzini (2010): Gazzini, Tarcisio, ‘Drawing the Line between Non-compensable Regulatory Powers and Indirect Expropriation of Foreign Investment – An Economic Analysis of Law Perspective’ 7 Manchester Journal of International Economic Law (2010) 36–51.Google Scholar

Gazzini (2016): Gazzini, Tarcisio, Interpretation of International Investment Treaties (Oxford: Hart 2016).Google Scholar

Gibson (2006): Gibson, Christopher S, Drahozal, Christopher R, ‘Iran–United States Claims Tribunal Precedent in Investor–State Arbitration’ 23 Journal of International Arbitration (2006) 521–46.Google Scholar

Gibson (2015): Gibson, Christopher S, ‘Case Comment: Yukos Universal Limited (Isle of Man) v The Russian Federation: A Classic Case of Indirect Expropriation’ 30 ICSID Review (2015) 303–14.Google Scholar

Gildemeister (2014): Gildemeister, Arno E, ‘Case Comment: Burlington Resources, Inc v Republic of Ecuador: How Much Is Too Much: When Is Taxation Tantamount to Expropriation?’ 29 ICSID Review (2014) 315–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Godshall (2002–3): Godshall, Lauren E, ‘In the Cold Shadow of Metalclad: The Potential for Change to NAFTA’s Chapter Eleven’ 11 New York University Environmental Law Journal (2002–3) 264–316.Google Scholar

Griller (1990): Griller, Stefan, Potacs, Michael, ‘Zur Unterscheidung von Pragmatik und Semantik in der juristischen Hermeneutik’ in Vetter, Helmuth, Potacs, Michael (eds.), Beiträge zur juristischen Hermeneutik (Vienna: Literas 1990) 66–105.Google Scholar

Grisel (2014): Grisel, Florian, ‘The Sources of Foreign Investment Law’ in Douglas, Zachary, Pauwelyn, Joost, Viñuales, Jorge E (eds.), The Foundations of International Investment Law: Bringing Theory into Practice (Oxford: Oxford University Press 2014) 213–33.Google Scholar

Guastini (1995): Guastini, Riccardo, ‘Kelsen on Legal Knowledge and Scientific Interpretation’ in Gianformaggio, Letizia, Paulson, Stanley L (eds.), Cognition and Interpretation of Law (Turin: Giappichelli 1995) 107–15.Google Scholar

Günther (1970): Günther, Herbert, Zur Entstehung von Völkergewohnheitsrecht (Berlin: Duncker & Humblot 1970).Google Scholar

Gutbrod (2006): Gutbrod, Max, Hindelang, Steffen, ‘Externalization of Effective Legal Protection against Indirect Expropriation: Can the Legal Order of Developing Countries Live Up to Standards Required by International Investment Agreements? A Disenchanting Comparative Analysis’ 7 Journal of World Investment & Trade (2006) 59–83.Google Scholar

Guzman (1998): Guzman, Andrew T, ‘Why LDCs Sign Treaties that Hurt Them: Explaining the Popularity of Bilateral Investment Treaties’ 38 Virginia Journal of International Law (1998) 639–88.Google Scholar

Guzman (2009): Guzman, Andrew T, Meyer, Timothy L, ‘International Common Law: The Soft Law of International Tribunals’ 9 Chicago Journal of International Law (2009) 515–35.Google Scholar

Haraszti (1973): Haraszti, György, Some Fundamental Problems of the Law of Treaties (Budapest: Akadémiai Kiadó 1973).Google Scholar

Harten (2006): Van Harten, Gus, Loughlin, Martin, ‘Investment Treaty Arbitration as a Species of Global Administrative Law’ 17 European Journal of International Law (2006) 121–50.Google Scholar

Harvard (1935): Harvard Law School, Codification of International Law: Part III Law of Treaties, printed in 29 American Journal of International Law Supplement (1935) 653–1226.Google Scholar

Herdegen (2012): Herdegen, Matthias, ‘Interpretation in International Law’ in Wolfrum, Rüdiger (ed.), Max Planck Encyclopedia of Public International Law, vol 6 (Oxford: Oxford University Press 2012) 260–73.Google Scholar

Henckels (2012): Henckels, Caroline, ‘Indirect Expropriation and the Right to Regulate: Revisiting Proportionality Analysis and the Standard of Review in Investor–State Arbitration’ 15 Journal of International Economic Law (2012) 223–55.Google Scholar

Henckels (2015): Henckels, Caroline, Proportionality and Deference in Investor–State Arbitration (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press 2015).Google Scholar

Higgins (1983): Higgins, Rosalyn, ‘The Taking of Property by the State: Recent Developments in International Law’ 176 Recueil des Cours 1982 (1983) 259–391.Google Scholar

Hindelang (2004): Hindelang, Steffen, ‘Bilateral Investment Treaties, Custom and a Healthy Investment Climate: The Question of Whether BITs Influence Customary International Law Revisited’ 5 Journal of World Investment & Trade (2004) 789–809.Google Scholar

Hoffmann (2008): Hoffmann, Anne K, ‘Indirect Expropriation’ in Reinisch, August (ed.), Standards of Investment Protection (Oxford: Oxford University Press 2008) 151–70.Google Scholar

Holtzendorff (1885): Franz von Holtzendorff, ‘Die Quellen des Völkerrechts’ in von Holtzendorff, Franz (ed.), Handbuch des Völkerrechts: Auf Grundlage Europäischer Staatspraxis, vol 1 (Berlin: Carl Habel 1885) 67–156.Google Scholar

Hoof (1983): van Hoof, GJH, Rethinking the Sources of International Law (Deventer: Kluwer 1983).Google Scholar

Höpfner (2008): Höpfner, Clemens, Die systemkonforme Auslegung: Zur Auflösung einfachgesetzlicher, verfassungsrechtlicher und europarechtlicher Widersprüche im Recht (Tubingen: Mohr 2008).Google Scholar

ILC (1963): Yearbook of the International Law Commission 1963, vol 1: Summary Records of the Fifteenth Session 6 May–12 July 1963, UN Doc A/CN.4/SER.A/1963 (New York: United Nations 1963).Google Scholar

ILC (1966): International Law Commission, ‘Draft Articles on the Law of Treaties with Commentaries’ in International Law Commission, Report of the International Law Commission on the Second Part of Its Seventeenth Session and on Its Eighteenth Session, A/6309/Rev.1, 18 Yearbook of the International Law Commission, vol II (1966) 187–274.Google Scholar

Jabloner (2013): Jabloner, Clemens, ‘Richterrecht als Rechtsquelle?’ in Jabloner, Clemens et al. (eds.), Gedenkschrift Robert Walter (Vienna: Manz 2013) 185–201.Google Scholar

Jacob (2011): Jacob, Marc, ‘Precedents: Lawmaking through International Adjudication’ 12 German Law Journal (2011) 1005–32.Google Scholar

Jaenicke (1960): Jaenicke, Günther, ‘Völkerrechtsquellen’ in Schlochauer, Hans-Jürgen (ed.), Wörterbuch des Völkerrechts, vol 3: Rapalo-Vertrag bis Zypern (2nd edn, Berlin: Walter de Gruyter 1960) 766–75.Google Scholar

Jeand’Heur (1989): Bernd, Jeand’Heur, Sprachliches Referenzverhalten bei der juristischen Entscheidungstätigkeit (Berlin: Duncker & Humblot 1989).Google Scholar

Jellinek (1880): Jellinek, Georg, Die rechtliche Natur der Staatenverträge: Ein Beitrag zur juristischen Construction des Völkerrechts (Vienna: Alfred Hölder 1880).Google Scholar

Jellinek (1905): Jellinek, Georg, System der subjektiven öffentlichen Rechte (Tubingen: Mohr 1905).Google Scholar

Jennings (1982): Jennings, Robert Y, ‘What Is International Law and How Do We Tell It When We See It?’ 37 Schweizerisches Jahrbuch für internationales Recht 1981 (1982) 59–88.Google Scholar

Jennings (1992): Jennings, Robert Y, Watts, Arthur (eds.), Oppenheim’s International Law, vol 1: Peace (9th edn, London: Longman 1992).Google Scholar

Jestaedt (2008): Jestaedt, Matthias, ‘Perspektiven einer Rechtswissenschaftstheorie’ in Jestaedt, Matthias, Lepsius, Oliver (eds.), Rechtswissenschaftstheorie (Tubingen: Mohr 2008) 185–205.Google Scholar

Jestaedt (2011): Jestaedt, Matthias, ‘Wissenschaftliches Recht: Rechtsdogmatik als gemeinsames Kommunikationsformat von Rechtswissenschaft und Rechtspraxis’ in Jabloner, Clemens et al. (eds.), Vom praktischen Wert der Methode: Festschrift Heinz Mayer zum 65. Geburtstag (Vienna: Manz 2011) 169–87.Google Scholar

Jestaedt (2014): Jestaedt, Matthias, ‘Wissenschaft im Recht: Rechtsdogmatik im Wissenschaftsvergleich’ 69 JuristenZeitung (2014) 1–12.Google Scholar

Jia (2010): Jia, Bing-Bing, ‘The Relations between Treaties and Custom’ 9 Chinese Journal of International Law (2010) 81–109.Google Scholar

Jones (2010): Jones, Oliver R, Dunn, Chido, ‘Consent, Forced Renegotiation and Expropriation in International Law’ 26 Arbitration International (2010) 391–408.Google Scholar

Kadelbach (1992): Kadelbach, Stefan, Zwingendes Völkerrecht (Berlin: Duncker & Humblot 1992).Google Scholar

Kammerhofer (2010a): Kammerhofer, Jörg, ‘Gaps, the Nuclear Weapons Advisory Opinion and the Structure of International Legal Argument between Theory and Practice’ 80 British Year Book of International Law 2009 (2010) 333–60.Google Scholar

Kammerhofer (2010b): Kammerhofer, Jörg, ‘Systemic Integration, Legal Theory and the ILC’ 19 Finnish Yearbook of International Law 2008 (2010) 157–82.Google Scholar

Kammerhofer (2010c): Kammerhofer, Jörg, ‘The Theory of Norm Conflict Solutions in International Investment Law’ in Gehring, Markus, Newcombe, Andrew, Segger, Marie-Claire Cordonier (eds.), Sustainable Development in International Investment Law (Alphen aan den Rijn: Wolters Kluwer 2010) 83–98.Google Scholar

Kammerhofer (2010d): Kammerhofer, Jörg, Uncertainty in International Law: A Kelsenian Perspective (Abingdon: Routledge 2010).Google Scholar

Kammerhofer (2011): Kammerhofer, Jörg, ‘Orthodox Generalists and Political Activists in International Legal Scholarship’ in Happold, Matthew (ed.), International Law in a Multipolar World (Abingdon: Routledge 2011) 138–57.Google Scholar

Kammerhofer (2012): Kammerhofer, Jörg, ‘Law-Making by Scholarship? The Dark Side of 21st Century International Legal “Methodology”’ in Crawford, James, Nouwen, Sarah (eds.), Select Proceedings of the European Society of International Law: Third Volume: International Law 1989–2010: A Performance Appraisal. Cambridge, 2–4 September 2010 (Oxford: Hart 2012) 115–26.Google Scholar

Kammerhofer (2013): Kammerhofer, Jörg, ‘Robert Walter, die Normkonflikte und der zweite Stufenbau des Rechts’ in Jabloner, Clemens et al. (eds.), Gedenkschrift Robert Walter (Vienna: Manz 2013) 237–56.Google Scholar

Kammerhofer (2014a): Kammerhofer, Jörg, ‘Die Reine Rechtslehre und die allgemeinen Rechtsprinzipien des Völkerrechts’ in Aliprantis, Nikitas, Olechowski, Thomas (eds.), Hans Kelsen: Die Aktualität eines großen Rechtswissenschaftlers und Soziologen des 20. Jahrhunderts (Vienna: Manz 2014) 25–35.Google Scholar

Kammerhofer (2014b): Kammerhofer, Jörg, ‘Hans Kelsen in Today’s International Legal Scholarship’ in Kammerhofer, Jörg, d’Aspremont, Jean (eds.), International Legal Positivism in a Post-Modern World (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press 2014) 81–113.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kammerhofer (2014c): Kammerhofer, Jörg, d’Aspremont, Jean (eds.), International Legal Positivism in a Post-Modern World (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press 2014).Google Scholar

Kammerhofer (2015): Kammerhofer, Jörg, ‘The Resilience of the Restrictive Rules of Self-Defence’ in Weller, Marc (ed.), The Oxford Handbook of the Use of Force in International Law (Oxford: Oxford University Press 2015) 627–48.Google Scholar

Kammerhofer (2016a): Kammerhofer, Jörg, ‘International Legal Positivism’ in Hoffmann, Florian, Orford, Anne (eds.), Oxford Handbook on International Legal Theory (Oxford: Oxford University Press 2016) 407–26.Google Scholar

Kammerhofer (2016b): Kammerhofer, Jörg, ‘Lawmaking by Scholars’ in Brölmann, Catherine, Radi, Yannick (eds.), Handbook on the Theory and Practice of International Lawmaking (Cheltenham: Edward Elgar 2016) 305–25.Google Scholar

Kammerhofer (2017a): Kammerhofer, Jörg, ‘Positivistische Normbegründung’ in Hilgendorf, Eric, Joerden, Jan C (eds.), Handbuch Rechtsphilosophie (Stuttgart: Metzler 2017) 200–8.Google Scholar

Kammerhofer (2017b): Kammerhofer, Jörg, ‘Sources in Legal Positivist Theories: The Pure Theory’s Structural Analysis of the Law’ in Besson, Samantha, d’Aspremont, Jean (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of the Sources of International Law (Oxford: Oxford University Press 2017) 343–62.Google Scholar

Kammerhofer (2018a): Kammerhofer, Jörg, ‘Der Stufenbau des Völkerrechts: Strukturanalyse statt Quellenmystik’ in Jabloner, Clemens, Kuklik, Jan, Olechowski, Thomas (eds.), Hans Kelsen in der tschechischen und internationalen Rechtslehre (Vienna: Manz 2018) 173–90.Google Scholar

Kammerhofer (2018b): Kammerhofer, Jörg, ‘The Challenges of History in International Investment Law: A View from Legal Theory’ in Schill, Stephan W, Tams, Christian J, Hofmann, Rainer (eds.), International Investment Law and History (Cheltenham: Edward Elgar 2018) 164–76.Google Scholar

Kammerhofer (2019): Kammerhofer, Jörg, ‘Positivist Approaches and International Adjudication’ in Fabri, Hélène Ruiz (ed.), Max Planck Encyclopedia of International Procedural Law (Oxford: Oxford University Press 2019), available at: opil.ouplaw.com/view/10.1093/law-mpeipro/e3300.013.3300/law-mpeipro-e3300.Google Scholar

Kammerhofer (in press a): Kammerhofer, Jörg, ‘International Legal Positivist Research Methods’ in Deplano, Rossana, Tsagourias, Nicholas (eds.), Research Methods in International Law: A Handbook (Cheltenham: Edward Elgar in press), available at: ssrn.com/abstract=3503295.Google Scholar

Kammerhofer (in press b): Kammerhofer, Jörg, ‘Between Pragmatism and Disenchantment: The Theory of Customary International Law after the ILC Project’ in Merkouris, Panos, Kammerhofer, Jörg, Arajärvi, Noora (eds.), The Theory, Practice and Interpretation of Customary Law (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press in press), available at: ssrn.com/abstract=3522535.Google Scholar

Kant (1781): Kant, Immanuel, Kritik der reinen Vernunft (Riga: Hartknoch 1781/1787).Google Scholar

Kant (1786): Kant, Immanuel, Grundlegung zur Metaphysik der Sitten (2nd edn, Riga: Hartknoch 1786).Google Scholar

Kant (1797): Kant, Immanuel, Metaphysik der Sitten (Königsberg: Friedrich Nicolovius 1797).Google Scholar

Karl (1983): Karl, Wolfram, Vertrag und späte Praxis im Völkerrecht: Zum Einfluss der Praxis auf Inhalt und Bestand völkerrechtlicher Verträge (Berlin: Springer 1983).Google Scholar

Kaser (1955): Kaser, Max, Das Römische Privatrecht, vol 1: Das altrömische, das vorklassische und klassische Recht (Munich: CH Beck 1955).Google Scholar

Kaser (1986): Kaser, Max, ‘“Ius publicum” und “ius privatum”’ 103 Zeitschrift der Savigny-Stiftung für Rechtsgeschichte Romanistische Abteilung (1986) 1–101.Google Scholar

Kaufmann-Kohler (2007): Kaufmann-Kohler, Gabrielle, ‘Arbitral Precedent: Dream, Necessity or Excuse?’ 23 Arbitration International (2007) 357–78.Google Scholar

Kaufmann-Kohler (2008): Kaufmann-Kohler, Gabrielle, ‘Is Consistency a Myth?’ in Banifatemi, Yas (ed.), Precedent in International Arbitration: IAI Seminar Paris – December 14, 2007 (New York: Juris 2008) 137–47.Google Scholar

Kelsen (1920): Kelsen, Hans, Das Problem der Souveränität und die Theorie des Völkerrechts: Beitrag zu einer reinen Rechtslehre (Tubingen: Mohr 1920) (4 HKW 235–572).Google Scholar

Kelsen (1945): Kelsen, Hans, General Theory of Law and State (Harvard: Harvard University Press 1945).Google Scholar

Kelsen (1950): Kelsen, Hans, The Law of the United Nations: A Critical Analysis of Its Fundamental Problems (New York: Praeger 1950).Google Scholar

Kelsen (1960): Kelsen, Hans, Reine Rechtslehre (2nd edn, Vienna: Deuticke 1960).Google Scholar

Kelsen (1979): Kelsen, Hans, Allgemeine Theorie der Normen (Vienna: Manz 1979).Google Scholar

Khachvani (2017): Khachvani, David, ‘Compensation for Unlawful Expropriation: Targeting the Illegality’ 32 ICSID Review (2017) 385–403.Google Scholar

King (2014): King, D Brian, Moloo, Rahim, ‘International Arbitrators as Lawmakers’ 46 New York University Journal of International Law and Politics (2014) 875–910.Google Scholar

Kinnear (2006): Kinnear, Meg N, Bjorklund, Andrea K, Hannaford, John FG, Investment Disputes under NAFTA: An Annotated Guide to NAFTA Chapter 11 (Alphen aan den Rijn: Kluwer 2006).Google Scholar

Kishoiyian (1994): Kishoiyian, Bernard, ‘The Utility of Bilateral Investment Treaties in the Formulation of Customary International Law’ 14 Northwestern Journal of International Law & Business (1994) 372–5.Google Scholar

Klabbers (2003): Klabbers, Jan, ‘International Legal Histories: The Declining Importance of Travaux Préparatoires in Treaty Interpretation?’ 50 Netherlands International Law Review (2003) 267–88.Google Scholar

Klabbers (2005): Klabbers, Jan, ‘On Rationalism in Politics: Interpretation of Treaties and the World Trade Organization’ 74 Nordic Journal of International Law (2005) 405–28.Google Scholar

Klabbers (2007): Klabbers, Jan, ‘Reluctant Grundnormen: Articles 31(3)(c) and 42 of the Vienna Convention on the Law of Treaties and the Fragmentation of International Law’ in Craven, Matthew, Fitzmaurice, Malgosia, Vogiatzi, Maria (eds.), Time, History and International Law (Leiden: Martinus Nijhoff 2007) 141–61.Google Scholar

Klabbers (2010): Klabbers, Jan, ‘Virtuous Interpretation’ in Fitzmaurice, Malgosia, Elias, Olufemi, Merkouris, Panos (eds.), Treaty Interpretation and the Vienna Convention on the Law of Treaties: 30 Years On (Leiden: Martinus Nijhoff 2010) 17–37.Google Scholar

Knahr (2009): Knahr, Christina, ‘Indirect Expropriation in Recent Investment Arbitration’ 6:1 Transnational Dispute Management (2009).Google Scholar

Köck (1976): Köck, Heribert Franz, Vertragsinterpretation und Vertragsrechtskonvention: Zur Bedeutung der Artikel 31 und 32 der Wiener Vertragsrechtskonvention 1969 (Berlin: Duncker & Humblot 1976).Google Scholar

Kolb (2003): Kolb, Robert, ‘Selected Problems in the Theory of Customary International Law’ 50 Netherlands International Law Review (2003) 119–50.Google Scholar

Koskenniemi (1989): Koskenniemi, Martti, From Apology to Utopia: The Structure of International Legal Argument (1989, reissued: Cambridge: Cambridge University Press 2005).Google Scholar

Koskenniemi (2006): Koskenniemi, Martti, ‘Fragmentation of International Law: Difficulties Arising from the Diversification and Expansion of International Law: Report of the Study Group of the International Law Commission’ in International Law Commission, Fifty-Eighth Session, Geneva, 1 May–9 June and 3 July–11 August 2006, A/CN.4/L.682 (2006).Google Scholar

Kriebaum (2007a): Kriebaum, Ursula, ‘Partial Expropriation’ 8 Journal of World Investment & Trade (2007) 69–84.Google Scholar

Kriebaum (2007b): Kriebaum, Ursula, ‘Regulatory Takings: Balancing the Interests of the Investor and the State’ 8 Journal of World Investment & Trade (2007) 717–44.Google Scholar

Kriebaum (2008a): Kriebaum, Ursula, Eigentumsschutz im Völkerrecht: Eine vergleichende Untersuchung zum internationalen Investitionsrecht sowie zum Menschenrechtsschutz (Berlin: Duncker & Humblot 2008).Google Scholar

Kriebaum (2008b): Kriebaum, Ursula, ‘Indirekte Enteignung oder zulässige Regulierung?’ in Georg Nolte, Peter Hilpold (eds.), Auslandsinvestitionen – Entwicklung großer Kodifikationen – Fragmentierung des Völkerrechts – Status des Kosovo: Beiträge zum 31. Österreichischen Völkerrechtstag 2006 in München (2008) 18–37.Google Scholar

Kriebaum (2015): Kriebaum, Ursula, ‘Expropriation’ in Bungenberg, Marc et al. (eds.), International Investment Law (Baden-Baden: Nomos 2015) 959–1030.Google Scholar

Kulick (2012): Kulick, Andreas, Global Public Interest in International Investment Law (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press 2012) 77–99.Google Scholar

Kunoy (2005): Kunoy, Bjørn, ‘Developments in Indirect Expropriation Case Law in ICSID Transnational Arbitration’ 6 Journal of World Investment & Trade (2005) 467–91.Google Scholar

Kunz (1953): Kunz, Joseph L, ‘The Nature of Customary International Law’ 47 American Journal of International Law (1953) 662–9.Google Scholar

Kurtz (2010): Kurtz, Jürgen, ‘Adjudging the Exceptional at International Investment Law: Security, Public Order and Financial Crisis’ 59 International and Comparative Law Quarterly (2010) 325–71.Google Scholar

Kurtz (2012): Kurtz, Jürgen, ‘Review Essay: The Shifting Landscape of International Investment Law and Its Commentary’ 106 American Journal of International Law (2012) 686–94.Google Scholar

Lamond (2010): Lamond, Grant, ‘Persuasive Authority in the Law’ 17 Philosophy of Law (2010) 16–35.Google Scholar

Lauterpacht (1927): Lauterpacht, Hersch, Private Law Sources and Analogies of International Law (With Special Reference to International Arbitration) (London: Longmans, Green and Co. 1927).Google Scholar

Lauterpacht (1931): Lauterpacht, Hersch, ‘The So-Called Anglo-American and Continental Schools of Thought in International Law’ 12 British Year Book of International Law (1931) 31–62.Google Scholar

Lauterpacht (1949): Lauterpacht, Hersch, ‘Restrictive Interpretation and the Principle of Effectiveness in the Interpretation of Treaties’ 26 British Year Book of International Law (1949) 48–85.Google Scholar

Lauterpacht (1958): Lauterpacht, Hersch, The Development of International Law by the International Court (London: Stevens & Sons 1958).Google Scholar

Lauterpacht (1970a): Lauterpacht, Hersch, ‘General Rules of the Law of Peace’ (English ms. unpublished) in Lauterpacht, Eliuh (ed.), International Law: Being the Collected Papers of Hersch Lauterpacht, vol 1: The General Works (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press 1970) 179–444.Google Scholar

Lauterpacht (1970b): Lauterpacht, Hersch, ‘International Law – the General Part’ (unpublished ms.) in Lauterpacht, Eliuh (ed.), International Law: Being the Collected Papers of Hersch Lauterpacht, vol 1: The General Works (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press 1970) 1–178.Google Scholar

Lévesque (2004): Lévesque, Céline, ‘Distinguishing Expropriation and Regulation under NAFTA Chapter 11: Making Explicit the Link to Property’ in Kennedy, Kevin C (ed.), The First Decade of NAFTA: The Future of Free Trade in North America (Ardsley: Transnational 2004) 293–324.Google Scholar

L’Hullier (1950): Jean, L’Hullier, Éléments de droit international public (Paris: Rousseau 1950).Google Scholar

Linderfalk (2007): Linderfalk, Ulf, On the Interpretation of Treaties: The Modern International Law as Expressed in the 1969 Vienna Convention on the Law of Treaties (Dordrecht: Springer 2007).Google Scholar

Lindquist (2005): Lindquist, Stefanie A, Cross, Frank B, ‘Empirically Testing Dworkin’s Chain Novel Theory: Studying the Path of Precedent’ 80 New York University Law Review (2005) 1156–1206.Google Scholar

Lippold (2000): Lippold, Rainer, Recht und Ordnung: Statik und Dynamik der Rechtsordnung (Vienna: Manz 2000).Google Scholar

López (2014): López Escarcena, Sebastián, Indirect Expropriation in International Law (Cheltenham: Edward Elgar 2014).Google Scholar

Lowe (2003): Lowe, Vaughan, ‘Regulation or Expropriation?’ 55 Current Legal Problems 2002 (2003) 447–66.Google Scholar

Lowenfeld (2003): Lowenfeld, Andreas F, ‘Investment Agreements and International Law’ 42 Columbia Journal of Transnational Law (2003) 123–30.Google Scholar

Mann (1960): Mann, FA, ‘State Contracts and State Responsibility’ 54 American Journal of International Law (1960) 572–91.Google Scholar

Marboe (2006): Marboe, Irmgard, ‘Compensation and Damages in International Law – The Limits of “Fair Market Value”’ 7 Journal of World Investment & Trade (2006) 723–59.Google Scholar

Marboe (2015a): Marboe, Irmgard, ‘The System of Reparation and Questions of Terminology’ in Bungenberg, Marc et al. (eds.), International Investment Law (Baden-Baden: Nomos 2015) 1031–44.Google Scholar

Marboe (2015b): Marboe, Irmgard, ‘Valuation in Cases of Expropriation’ in Bungenberg, Marc et al. (eds.), International Investment Law (Baden-Baden: Nomos 2015) 1057–81.Google Scholar

Markert (2011): Markert, Lars, ‘International Investment Law and Treaty Interpretation – Problems, Particularities and Possible Trends’ in Hofmann, Rainer, Tams, Christian (eds.), International Investment Law and General International Law: From Clinical Isolation to Systemic Integration? (Baden-Baden: Nomos 2011) 53–69.Google Scholar

Marlles (2006–7): Marlles, Justin R, ‘Public Purpose, Private Losses: Regulatory Expropriation and Environmental Regulation in International Investment Law’ 16 Journal of Transnational Law and Policy (2006–7) 275–336.Google Scholar

Mayer (1992): Mayer, Heinz, ‘Die Interpretationstheorie der Reinen Rechtslehre’ in Walter, Robert (ed.), Schwerpunkte der Reinen Rechtslehre (Vienna: Manz 1992) 61–70.Google Scholar

Mbengue (2016): Mbengue, Makane Moïse, ‘Rules of Interpretation (Article 32 of the Vienna Convention on the Law of Treaties)’ 31 ICSID Review (2016) 388–412.Google Scholar

McLachlan (2005): McLachlan, Campbell, ‘The Principle of Systemic Integration and Article 31(3)(c) of the Vienna Convention’ 54 International and Comparative Law Quarterly (2005) 279–320.Google Scholar

McLachlan (2007): McLachlan, Campbell, Shore, Laurence, Weiniger, Matthew, International Investment Arbitration: Substantive Principles (Oxford: Oxford University Press 2007).Google Scholar

McLachlan (2008): McLachlan, Campbell, ‘Investment Treaties and General International Law’ 57 International and Comparative Law Quarterly (2008) 361–401.Google Scholar

McLachlan (2016): McLachlan, Campbell, ‘Is There an Evolving Customary International Law on Investment?’ 31 ICSID Review (2016) 257–69.Google Scholar

McNair (1961): McNair, Arnold Duncan, The Law of Treaties (Oxford: Clarendon Press 1961).Google Scholar

Mendelson (1999): Mendelson, Maurice H, ‘The Formation of Customary International Law’ 272 Recueil des Cours 1998 (1999) 155–410.Google Scholar

Merkl (1916): Merkl, Adolf Julius, ‘Zum Interpretationsproblem’ 42 [Grünhutsche] Zeitschrift für das Privat- und öffentliche Recht der Gegenwart (1916) 535–6 (WRS 1059–77, I/1 MerklGS 63–83).Google Scholar

Merkl (1916–19): Merkl, Adolf Julius, ‘Das Recht im [Spiegel] Lichte seiner [Auslegung] Anwendung’ [the title varies] 8 Deutsche Richterzeitung (1916) col 584–92, 9 Deutsche Richterzeitung (1917) col 162–76, 394–8, 443–50, 11 Deutsche Richterzeitung (1919) col 290–8 (WRS 1167–1201, I/1 MerklGS 85–146).Google Scholar

Merkl (1922): Merkl, Adolf Julius, ‘Gesetzesrecht und Richterrecht’ 2 Wissenschaftliche Vierteljahresschrift der Prager Juristischen Zeitschrift (1922) 337–44 (WRS 1615–24, I/1 MerklGS 317–27).Google Scholar

Merkl (1923): Merkl, Adolf Julius, Die Lehre von der Rechtskraft, entwickelt aus dem Rechtsbegriff: Eine rechtstheoretische Untersuchung (Leipzig: Deuticke 1923).Google Scholar

Merkl (1931): Merkl, Adolf Julius, ‘Prolegomena einer Theorie des rechtlichen Stufenbaues’ in Verdross, Alfred (ed.), Gesellschaft, Staat und Recht: Festschrift für Hans Kelsen zum 50. Geburtstag (Vienna: Springer 1931) 252–94 (WRS 1311–61, I/1 MerklGS 437–92).Google Scholar

Merkouris (2015): Merkouris, Panos, Article 31(3) VCLT and the Principle of Systemic Integration: Normative Shadows in Plato’s Cave (Leiden: Martinus Nijhoff 2015).Google Scholar

Mitchell (2017): Mitchell, Andrew D, Munro, James, ‘Someone Else’s Deal: Interpreting International Investment Agreements in the Light of Third-Party Agreements’ 28 European Journal of International Law (2017) 669–95.Google Scholar

Mostafa (2008): Mostafa, Ben, ‘The Sole Effects Doctrine, Police Powers and Indirect Expropriation under International Law’ 15 Australian International Law Journal (2008) 267–96.Google Scholar

Müller (1993): Müller, Friedrich, Juristische Methodik (5th edn, Berlin: Duncker & Humblot 1993).Google Scholar

Müllerson (1998): Müllerson, Rein, ‘The Interplay of Objective and Subjective Elements in Customary Law in Wellens, Karel (ed.), International Law: Theory and Practice: Essays in Honour of Eric Suy (The Hague: Martinus Nijhoff 1998) 161–78.Google Scholar

Nanteuil (2014): de Nanteuil, Arnaud, L’expropriation indirecte en droit international de l’investissement (Paris: Pedone 2014).Google Scholar

Newcombe (1999): Newcombe, Andrew, Regulatory Expropriation, Investment Protection and International Law: When Is Government Regulation Expropriatory and When Should Compensation Be Paid? (LL.M. thesis, University of Toronto 1999).Google Scholar

Newcombe (2005): Newcombe, Andrew, ‘The Boundaries of Regulatory Expropriation in International Law’ 20 ICSID Review – Foreign Investment Law Journal (2005) 1–57.Google Scholar

Newcombe (2009): Newcombe, Andrew, Paradell, Lluís, Law and Practice of Investment Treaties: Standards of Treatment (Alphen aan den Rijn: Kluwer 2009).Google Scholar

Newcombe (2011): Newcombe, Andrew, ‘General Exceptions in International Investment Agreements’ in Segger, Marie-Claire Cordonier, Gehring, Markus W, Newcombe, Andrew (eds.), Sustainable Development in World Investment Law (Alphen aan den Rijn: Wolters Kluwer 2011) 355–70.Google Scholar

Nikièma (2012): Nikièma, Suzy H, L’expropriation indirecte en droit international des investissements (Paris: Presses Universitaires de France 2012).Google Scholar

Nolte (2013): Nolte, Georg, ‘First Report on Subsequent Agreements and Subsequent Practice in Relation to Treaty Interpretation’, International Law Commission, Sixty-Fifth Session, Geneva, 6 May–7 June and 8 July–9 August 2013, A/CN.4/660.Google Scholar

Nolte (2014): Nolte, Georg, ‘Second Report on Subsequent Agreements and Subsequent Practice in Relation to the Interpretation of Treaties’, International Law Commission, Sixty-Sixth Session, Geneva, 5 May–6 June and 7 July–8 August 2014, A/CN.4/671 (2014).Google Scholar

Nolte (2015): Nolte, Georg, ‘Third Report on Subsequent Agreements and Subsequent Practice in Relation to the Interpretation of Treaties’, International Law Commission, Sixty-Seventh Session, Geneva, 4 May–5 June and 6 July–7 August 2015, A/CN.4/683 (2015).Google Scholar

Nolte (2016): Nolte, Georg, ‘Fourth Report on Subsequent Agreements and Subsequent Practice in Relation to the Interpretation of Treaties’, International Law Commission, Sixty-Eighth Session, Geneva, 2 May–10 June and 4 July–12 August 2016, A/CN.4/694 (2016).Google Scholar

Norton (1991): Norton, Patrick M, ‘A Law of the Future or a Law of the Past? Modern Tribunals and the International Law of Expropriation’ 85 American Journal of International Law (1991) 474–505.Google Scholar

OECD (1968): Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development, ‘Draft Convention on the Protection of Foreign Property’ reprinted in 7 International Legal Materials (1968) 117–43.Google Scholar

Öhlinger (1975): Öhlinger, Theo, Der Stufenbau der Rechtsordnung: Rechtstheoretische und ideologische Aspekte (Vienna: Manz 1975).Google Scholar

Oppenheim (1905): Oppenheim, Lassa, International Law: A Treatise, vol 1: Peace (London: Longmans, Green and Comp. 1905).Google Scholar

Orakhelashvili (2003): Orakhelashvili, Alexander, ‘Restrictive Interpretation of Human Rights Treaties in the Recent Jurisprudence of the European Court of Human Rights’ 14 European Journal of International Law (2003) 529–68.Google Scholar

Orakhelashvili (2006): Orakhelashvili, Alexander, Peremptory Norms in International Law (Oxford: Oxford University Press 2006).Google Scholar

Orakhelashvili (2008): Orakhelashvili, Alexander, The Interpretation of Acts and Rules in Public International Law (Oxford: Oxford University Press 2008).Google Scholar

Orrego Vicuña (2003): Orrego Vicuña, Francisco, ‘Regulatory Authority and Legitimate Expectations: Balancing the Rights of the State and the Individual under International Law in a Global Society’ 5 International Law Forum (2003) 188–97.Google Scholar

Ortino (2016): Ortino, Federico, ‘Defining Indirect Expropriation: The Transatlantic Trade and Investment Partnership and the (Elusive) Search for “Greater Certainty”’ 43 Legal Issues of Economic Integration (2016) 351–66.Google Scholar

Paparinskis (2010a): Paparinskis, Martins, ‘Investment Protection Law and Sources of Law: A Critical Look’ 103 ASIL Proceedings (2010) 76–9.Google Scholar

Paparinskis (2010b): Paparinskis, Martins, ‘Investment Protection Law and Systemic Integration of Treaty and Custom’, SIEL Online Proceedings Working Paper 2010/21, available at: ssrn.com/abstract=1632559.Google Scholar

Paparinskis (2011a): Paparinskis, Martins, ‘Investment Treaty Interpretation and Customary Investment Law: Preliminary Remarks’ in Brown, Chester, Miles, Kate (eds.), Evolution in Investment Treaty Law and Arbitration (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press 2011) 65–96.Google Scholar

Paparinskis (2011b): Paparinskis, Martins, ‘Regulatory Expropriation and Sustainable Development’ in Segger, Marie-Claire Cordonier, Gehring, Markus W, Newcombe, Andrew (eds.), Sustainable Development in World Investment Law (Alphen aan den Rijn: Wolters Kluwer 2011) 299–327.Google Scholar

Paparinskis (2012): Paparinskis, Martins, ‘Sources of Law and Arbitral Interpretations of Pari Materia Investment Protection Rules’ in Fauchald, Ole Kristian, Nollkaemper, André (eds.), The Practice of International and National Courts and the (De-)Fragmentation of International Law (Oxford: Hart 2012) 87–116, cited from: ssrn.com/abstract=1697835.Google Scholar

Parlett (2016): Parlett, Kate, ‘Claims under Customary International Law in ICSID Arbitration’ 31 ICSID Review (2016) 434–56.Google Scholar

Paulson (2018): Paulson, Stanley L, ‘The Purity Thesis’ 31 Ratio Juris (2018) 276–306.Google Scholar

Paulsson (2004): Paulsson, Jan, Douglas, Zachary, ‘Indirect Expropriation in Investment Treaty Arbitrations’ in Horn, Norbert (ed.), Arbitrating Foreign Investment Disputes (The Hague: Kluwer 2004) 145–58.Google Scholar

Paulsson (2006): Paulsson, Jan, ‘Indirect Expropriation: Is the Right to Regulate at Risk?’ 3:2 Transnational Dispute Management (2006).Google Scholar

Paulsson (2010): Paulsson, Jan, ‘The Role of Precedent in Investment Arbitration’ in Yannaca-Small, Katia (ed.), Arbitration under International Investment Agreements: A Guide to the Key Issues (Oxford: Oxford University Press 2010) 699–718.Google Scholar

Peczenik (1997): Peczenik, Aleksander, ‘The Binding Force of Precedent’ in MacCormick, D Neil, Summers, Robert S (eds.), Interpreting Precedents: A Comparative Study (Aldershot: Ashgate 1997) 461–79.Google Scholar

Pellonpää (1989): Pellonpää, Matti, Fitzmaurice, Malgosia, ‘Taking of Property in the Practice of the Iran–United States Claims Tribunal’ 19 Netherlands Yearbook of International Law 1988 (1989) 53–178.Google Scholar

Petersen (2007): Petersen, Niels, ‘Customary Law Without Custom? Rules, Principles, and the Role of State Practice in International Norm Creation’ 32 American University International Law Review (2007) 275–310.Google Scholar

Pfersmann (2009): Pfersmann, Otto, ‘Hans Kelsens Rolle in der gegenwärtigen Rechtswissenschaft’ in Walter, Robert, Ogris, Werner, Olechowski, Thomas (eds.), Hans Kelsen: Leben–Werk–Wirksamkeit. Ergebnisse einer Internationalen Tagung, veranstaltet von der Kommission für Rechtsgeschichte Österreichs und dem Hans Kelsen-Institut (19.–21. April 2009) (Vienna: Manz 2009) 367–87.Google Scholar

Piran (1995): Piran, Hossein, ‘Indirect Expropriation in the Case Law of the Iran–United States Claims Tribunal’ 6 Finnish Yearbook of International Law (1995) 140–247.Google Scholar

Potacs (2015): Potacs, Michael, Rechtstheorie (Vienna: facultas 2015).Google Scholar

Procès-verbaux (1920): Permanent Court of International Justice Advisory Committee of Jurists, Procès-verbaux of the Proceedings of the Committee June 16th–July 24th 1920 with Annexes (The Hague: van Langenhuysen 1920).Google Scholar

Prugger (1990): Prugger, F, ‘A Source Problem of International Law in the Field of Expropriation of Alien Property’ 16 Thesaurus Acroasium (1990) 869–81.Google Scholar

Pulkowski (2014): Pulkowski, Dirk, The Law and Politics of International Regime Conflict (Oxford: Oxford University Press 2014).Google Scholar

Radnitzky (1914): Radnitzky, Ernst, ‘Dispositives Völkerrecht’ 1 Österreichische Zeitschrift für öffentliches Recht (1914) 656–74.Google Scholar

Ratner (2008): Ratner, Stephen R, ‘Regulatory Takings in Institutional Context: Beyond the Fear of Fragmented International Law’ 102 American Journal of International Law (2008) 475–528.Google Scholar

Ratner (2017): Ratner, Stephen R, ‘Compensation for Expropriations in a World of Investment Treaties: Beyond the Lawful/Unlawful Distinction’ 111 American Journal of International Law (2017) 7–56.Google Scholar

Reimann (1971): Reimann, Heinrich Bernhard, Ius cogens im Völkerrecht: Eine quellenkritische Untersuchung (Zurich: Schulthess 1971).Google Scholar

Reinisch (2008a): Reinisch, August, ‘Expropriation’ in Muchlinski, Peter, Ortino, Federico, Schreuer, Christoph (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of International Investment Law (Oxford: Oxford University Press 2008) 407–58.Google Scholar

Reinisch (2008b): Reinisch, August, ‘Legality of Expropriations’ in Reinisch, August (ed.), Standards of Investment Protection (Oxford: Oxford University Press 2008) 171–204.Google Scholar

Reinisch (2008c): Reinisch, August (ed.), Standards of Investment Protection (Oxford: Oxford University Press 2008).Google Scholar

Reinisch (2008d): Reinisch, August, ‘The Role of Precedent in ICSID Arbitration’ Austrian Arbitration Yearbook (2008) 495–510.Google Scholar

Reinisch (2015): Reinisch, August, ‘The Interpretation of International Investment Agreements’ in Bungenberg, Marc et al. (ed.), International Investment Law: A Handbook (Baden-Baden: Nomos 2015) 372–410.Google Scholar

Reisman (2004): Reisman, W Michael, Sloane, Robert D, ‘Indirect Expropriation and Its Valuation in the BIT Generation’ 74 British Year Book of International Law 2003 (2004) 115–50.Google Scholar

Restatement (1987): American Law Institute, Restatement of the Law: The Foreign Relations Law of the United States, vol 1 (St Paul: American Law Institute Publishers 1987).Google Scholar

Rieger (1997): Rieger, Thomas, Grundsätze der Unternehmensenteignung in der Rechtsprechung des Iran–United States Claims Tribunal (Cologne: Heymans 1997).Google Scholar

Roberts (2001): Roberts, Anthea Elizabeth, ‘Traditional and Modern Approaches to Customary International Law’ 95 American Journal of International Law (2001) 757–91.Google Scholar

Roberts (2013): Roberts, Anthea Elizabeth, ‘Clash of Paradigms: Actors and Analogies Shaping the Investment Treaty System’ 107 American Journal of International Law (2013) 45–94.Google Scholar

Rosentreter (2015): Rosentreter, Daniel, Article 31(3)(c) of the Vienna Convention on the Law of Treaties and the Principle of Systemic Integration in International Investment Law and Arbitration (Baden-Baden: Nomos 2015).Google Scholar

Rudden (1980): Rudden, Bernhard, ‘Ius cogens, ius dispositivum’ 11 Cambrian Law Review (1980) 87–100.Google Scholar

Sacerdoti (1998): Sacerdoti, Giorgio, ‘Bilateral Treaties and Multilateral Instruments on Investment Protection’ 269 Recueil des Cours 1997 (1998) 251–460.Google Scholar

Salacuse (2010): Salacuse, Jeswald W, The Law of International Investment Treaties (Oxford: Oxford University Press 2010).Google Scholar

Saldarriaga (2013): Saldarriaga, Andrea, ‘Investment Awards and the Rules of Interpretation of the Vienna Convention: Making Room for Improvement’ 28 ICSID Review (2013) 197–217.Google Scholar

Sands (1999): Sands, Philippe, ‘Treaty, Custom and the Cross-Fertilization of International Law’ 1 Yale Human Rights & Development Law Journal (1999) 85–105.Google Scholar

Sauer (1948): Sauer, Ernst, Grundlehre des Völkerrechts (Cologne: Balduin Pick 1948).Google Scholar

Savigny (1840): von Savigny, Friedrich Carl, System des heutigen Römischen Rechts, vol 1 (Berlin: Veit und Comp. 1840).Google Scholar

Schäffer (1973): Schäffer, Heinz, ‘Rechtsquellen und Rechtsanwendung’ inVerhandlungen des fünften Österreichischen Juristentages Wien 1973, vol I.1.B (Vienna: Manz 1973).Google Scholar

Scheuner (1977): Scheuner, Ulrich, ‘Internationale Verträge als Elemente der Bildung von völkerrechtlichem Gewohnheitsrecht’ in Flume, Werner et al. (eds.), Internationales Recht und Wirtschaftsordnung: Festschrift für FA Mann zum 70. Geburtstag am 11. August 1977 (Munich: CH Beck 1977) 409–38.Google Scholar

Schill (2006): Schill, Stephan W, ‘Revisiting a Landmark: Indirect Expropriation and Fair and Equitable Treatment in the ICSID Case Tecmed’ 3:2 Transnational Dispute Management (2006).Google Scholar

Schill (2009): Schill, Stephan W, The Multilateralization of International Investment Law (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press 2009).Google Scholar

Schill (2010): Schill, Stephan W, ‘International Investment Law and Comparative Public Law – An Introduction’ in Schill, Stephan W (ed.), International Investment Law and Comparative Public Law (Oxford: Oxford University Press 2010) 3–37.Google Scholar

Schill (2011): Schill, Stephan W, ‘System-Building in Investment Treaty Arbitration and Lawmaking’ 12 German Law Journal (2011) 1083–1110.Google Scholar

Schiller (1938): Schiller, A Arthur, ‘Custom in Classical Roman Law’ 24 Virginia Law Review (1938) 268–82.Google Scholar

Schlink (1989): Schlink, Bernhard, ‘Die Entthronung der Staatsrechtswissenschaft durch die Verfassungsgerichtsbarkeit’ 28 Der Staat (1989) 161–72.Google Scholar

Schmitt (1928): Schmitt, Carl, Verfassungslehre [1928] (9th edn, Berlin: Duncker & Humblot, 2003).Google Scholar

Schmitt (1932): Schmitt, Carl, Der Begriff des Politischen [1932] (7th edn, Berlin: Duncker & Humblot 1991).Google Scholar

Schramm (2005): Schramm, Alfred, ‘“Richterrecht” und Gesetzesrecht: Eine rechtsvergleichende Analyse anhand von Merkls Rechtsnormenlehre’ 36 Rechtstheorie (2005) 185–208.Google Scholar

Schreuer (2006): Schreuer, Christoph, ‘The Concept of Expropriation under the ETC and Other Investment Protection Treaties’ in Ribeiro, Clarisse (ed.), Investment Arbitration and the Energy Charter Treaty (New York: JurisNet 2006) 108–59.Google Scholar

Schreuer (2008): Schreuer, Christoph, Weininger, Matthew, ‘A Doctrine of Precedent?’ in Muchlinski, Peter, Ortino, Federico, Schreuer, Christoph (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of International Investment Law (Oxford: Oxford University Press 2008) 1188–1206.Google Scholar

Schwarzenberger (1969): Schwarzenberger, Georg, ‘Myths and Realities of Treaty Interpretation: Articles 27–29 of the Vienna Draft Convention on the Law of Treaties’ 22 Current Legal Problems (1969) 205–27.Google Scholar

Schwebel (2004): Schwebel, Stephen M, ‘The Influence of Bilateral Investment Treaties on Customary International Law’ 98 American Society of International Law Proceedings (2004) 27–30.Google Scholar

Schwebel (2011): Schwebel, Stephen M, ‘The United States 2004 Model Bilateral Investment Treaty: An Exercise in the Regressive Development of International Law’ in Schwebel, Stephen M, Justice in International Law: Further Selected Writings (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press 2011) 152–60.Google Scholar

Searle (1969): Searle, John R, Speech Acts: An Essay in the Philosophy of Language (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press 1969).Google Scholar

Shaffer (2015): Shaffer, Gregory, ‘The New Legal Realist Approach to International Law’ 28 Leiden Journal of International Law (2015) 189–210.Google Scholar

Shahabuddeen (1996): Shahabuddeen, Mohamed, Precedent in the World Court (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press 1996).Google Scholar

Sheppard (2006): Sheppard, Audley, ‘The Distinction between Lawful and Unlawful Expropriation’ in Ribeiro, Clarisse (ed.), Investment Arbitration and the Energy Charter Treaty (New York: JurisNet 2006) 169–99.Google Scholar

Shirlow (2014): Shirlow, Esmé, ‘Deference and Indirect Expropriation Analysis in International Investment Law: Observations on Current Approaches and Frameworks for Future Analysis’ 29 ICSID Review (2014) 595–626.Google Scholar

Sinclair (1984): Sinclair, Ian, The Vienna Convention on the Law of Treaties (2nd edn, Manchester: Manchester University Press 1984).Google Scholar

Sohn (1961): Sohn, Louis B, Baxter, Richard R, ‘Responsibility of States for Injuries to the Economic Interests of Aliens’ 55 American Journal of International Law (1961) 545–84.Google Scholar

Somek (1996): Somek, Alexander, Der Gegenstand der Rechtserkenntnis: Epitaph eines juristischen Problems (Baden-Baden: Nomos 1996).Google Scholar

Somek (2011): Somek, Alexander, ‘The Spirit of Legal Positivism’, 12 German Law Journal (2011) 729–56.Google Scholar

Somek (2012): Somek, Alexander, ‘Legal Science as a Source of Law: A Late Reply by Puchta to Kantorowicz’ (working paper 2012), available at: ssrn.com/abstract=2175235.Google Scholar

Somek (2018): Somek, Alexander, Wissen des Rechts (Tubingen: Mohr 2018).Google Scholar

Sornarajah (2010): Sornarajah, Muthucumaraswamy, The International Law on Foreign Investment (3rd edn, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press 2010).Google Scholar

Sourgens (2014): Sourgens, Frédéric G, ‘Law’s Laboratory: Developing International Law on Investment Protection as Common Law’ 34 Northwestern Journal of International Law & Business (2014) 181–247.Google Scholar

Sourgens (2015): Sourgens, Frédéric G, A Nascent Common Law: The Process of Decisionmaking in International Legal Disputes Between States and Foreign Investors (The Hague: Nijhoff 2015).Google Scholar

Stern (2008): Stern, Brigitte, ‘In Search of the Frontiers of Indirect Expropriation’ in Rovine, Arthur W (ed.), Contemporary Issues in International Arbitration and Mediation: The Fordham Papers 2007 (Leiden: Nijhoff 2008) 29–51.Google Scholar

Stifter (2016): Stifter, Lukas, Reinisch, August, ‘Expropriation in the Light of the UNCTAD Investment Policy Framework for Sustainable Development’ in Hindelang, Steffen, Krajewski, Markus (eds.), Shifting Paradigms in International Investment Law: More Balanced, Less Isolated, Increasingly Diversified (Oxford: Oxford University Press 2016) 81–96.Google Scholar

Stone (1953–5): Stone, Julius, ‘Fictitional Elements in Treaty Interpretation – A Study in the International Judicial Process’ 1 Sydney Law Review (1953–5) 344–68.Google Scholar

Stone (1960): Stone, Julius, ‘Non liquet and the Function of Law in the International Community’ 35 British Year Book of International Law 1959 (1960) 124–61.Google Scholar

Stone Sweet (2017): Stone Sweet, Alec, Chung, Michael Yunsuck, Saltzman, Adam, ‘Arbitral Lawmaking and State Power: An Empirical Analysis of Investor–State Arbitration’ 8 Journal of International Dispute Settlement (2017) 579–609.Google Scholar

Strazzeri (2001–2): Strazzeri, Joseph A, ‘A Lucas Analysis of Regulatory Expropriations under NAFTA Chapter Eleven’ 14 Georgetown International Environmental Law Review (2001–2) 837–59.Google Scholar

Suárez (1612): Suárez, Francisco, De legibus ac Deo legislatore [1612].Google Scholar

Subedī (2006): Subedī, Sūrya Prasāda, ‘The Challenge of Reconciling the Competing Principles within the Law of Foreign Investment with Special Reference to the Recent Trend in the Interpretation of the Term “Expropriation”’ 40 International Lawyer (2006) 121–41.Google Scholar

Subedī (2016): Subedī, Sūrya Prasāda, International Investment Law: Reconciling Policy and Principle (3rd edn, Oxford: Hart 2016).Google Scholar

Sur (1974): Sur, Serge, L’interprétation en droit international public (Paris: LGDJ 1974).Google Scholar

Talmon (2015): Talmon, Stefan, ‘Determining Customary International Law: The ICJ’s Methodology between Induction, Deduction and Assertion’ 26 European Journal of International Law (2015) 417–43.Google Scholar

Taruffo (1997): Taruffo, Michele, La Torre, Massimo, ‘Precedent in Italy’ in MacCormick, D Neil, Summers, Robert S (eds.), Interpreting Precedents: A Comparative Study (Aldershot: Ashgate 1997) 141–88.Google Scholar

Ten Cate (2013): Ten Cate, Irene M, ‘The Costs of Consistency: Precedent in Investment Treaty Arbitration’ 51 Columbia Journal of Transnational Law (2013) 418–78.Google Scholar

Thaler (1982): Thaler, Michel, Mehrdeutigkeit und juristische Auslegung (Vienna: Springer 1982).Google Scholar

Thirlway (1972): Thirlway, Hugh WA, International Customary Law and Codification: An Examination of the Continuing Role of Custom in the Present Period of Codification of International Law (Leiden: AW Sijthoff 1972).Google Scholar

Titi (2013): Titi, Catharine, ‘The Arbitrator as a Lawmaker: Jurisgenerative Processes in Investment Arbitration’ 4 Journal of World Investment & Trade (2013) 829–51.Google Scholar

Titi (2014): Titi, Aikaterini, The Right to Regulate in International Investment Law (Baden-Baden: Nomos 2014).Google Scholar

Titi (2018): Titi, Catharine, ‘Refining the Expropriation Clause: What Role for Proportionality?’ in Chaisse, Julien (ed.), China–European Union Investment Relationships: Towards a New Leadership in Global Investment Governance? (Cheltenham: Edward Elgar 2018), available at and cited from: ssrn.com/abstract=2978530 (2017).Google Scholar

Triantafilou (2006): Triantafilou, Epaminontas E, ‘Taxation as Expropriation: Some Observations on EnCana v. Ecuador’ 3:5 Transnational Dispute Management (2006).Google Scholar

Triepel (1899): Triepel, Heinrich, Völkerrecht und Landesrecht (Leipzig: CL Hirschfeld 1899).Google Scholar

Trinh (2014): Trinh, Hai Yen, The Interpretation of Investment Treaties (Leiden: Martinus Nijhoff 2014).Google Scholar

Troper (1997): Troper, Michel, ‘Precedent in France’ in MacCormick, D Neil, Summers, Robert S (eds.), Interpreting Precedents: A Comparative Study (Aldershot: Ashgate 1997) 103–40.Google Scholar

UNCTAD (2000): United Nations Conference on Trade and Development, Taking of Property [UNCTAD/ITE/IIT/15] (2000).Google Scholar

UNCTAD (2012): United Nations Conference on Trade and Development, Expropriation [UNCTAD/DIAE/IA/2011/7] (2012).Google Scholar

UNCTAD (2014): United Nations Conference on Trade and Development, World Investment Report 2014: Investing in the SGDs: A Plan for Action (New York: United Nations 2014).Google Scholar

Valasek (2007): Valasek, Martin J, ‘A “Simple Scheme”: Exploring the Meaning of Chorzów Factory for the Valuation of Opportunistic Expropriation in the BIT Generation’ 4:6 Transnational Dispute Management (2007).Google Scholar

Vandevelde (1993): Vandevelde, Kenneth J, ‘U.S. Bilateral Investment Treaties: The Second Wave’ 14 Michigan Journal of International Law (1993) 621–704.Google Scholar

Veith (1962): Veith, Werner, Böckstiegel, Karl-Heinz, Der Schutz von ausländischen Vermögen im Völkerrecht (Baden-Baden: Lutzeyer 1962).Google Scholar

Verdross (1926): Verdross, Alfred, Die Verfassung der Völkerrechtsgemeinschaft (Vienna: Springer 1926).Google Scholar

Verdross (1937): Verdross, Alfred, Völkerrecht (Berlin: Springer 1937).Google Scholar

Verwey (1984): Verwey, Wil D, Schrijver, Nico, ‘The Taking of Foreign Property under International Law: A New Legal Perspective?’ 15 Netherlands Yearbook of International Law (1984) 3–96.Google Scholar

Villiger (1997): Villiger, Mark E, Customary International Law and Treaties: A Manual on the Theory and Practice of the Interrelation of Sources (2nd edn, The Hague: Kluwer Law International 1997).Google Scholar

Villiger (2011): Villiger, Mark E, ‘The Rules on Interpretation: Misgivings, Misunderstandings, Miscarriage? The “Crucible” Intended by the International Law Commission’ in Cannizzaro, Enzo (ed.), The Law of Treaties Beyond the Vienna Convention (Oxford: Oxford University Press 2011) 105–22.Google Scholar

Wagner (1999): Wagner, J Martin, ‘International Investment, Expropriation and Environmental Protection’ 29 Golden Gate University Law Review (1999) 465–538.Google Scholar

Wälde (2001): Wälde, Thomas W, Kolo, Abba, ‘Environmental Regulation, Investment Protection and Regulatory Taking in International Law’ 50 International and Comparative Law Quarterly (2001) 811–48.Google Scholar

Wälde (2007): Wälde, Thomas W, ‘Specific Nature of Investment Arbitration’ in Kahn, Philippe, Wälde, Thomas W (eds.), New Aspects of International Investment Law (Leiden: Brill 2007) 43–120.Google Scholar

Wälde (2009): Wälde, Thomas W, ‘Interpreting Investment Treaties: Experiences and Examples’ in Binder, Christina et al. (eds.), International Investment Law for the 21st Century: Essays in Honour of Christoph Schreuer (Oxford: Oxford University Press 2009) 724–81.Google Scholar

Waldock (1964): Waldock, Humphrey, ‘Third Report on the Law of Treaties’, A.CN.4/167, A.CN.4/167/Add.1–3, 16 Yearbook of the International Law Commission, vol II (1964) 5–65.Google Scholar

Walter (1963): Walter, Robert, ‘Die Gewohnheit als rechtserzeugender Tatbestand’ 18 Österreichische Juristen-Zeitung (1963) 225–32.Google Scholar

Walter (1964): Walter, Robert, Der Aufbau der Rechtsordnung: Eine rechtstheoretische Untersuchung auf Grundlage der Reinen Rechtslehre (Graz: Leykam 1964).Google Scholar

Walter (1983): Walter, Robert, ‘Das Auslegungsproblem im Lichte der Reinen Rechtslehre’ in Kohlmann, Günther (ed.), Festschrift für Ulrich Klug zum 70. Geburtstag (Cologne: Peter Deubner 1983) 187–97.Google Scholar

Weeramantry (2012): Weeramantry, J Romesh, Treaty Interpretation in Investment Arbitration (Oxford: Oxford University Press 2012).Google Scholar

Weidemaier (2010): Weidemaier, W Mark C, ‘Toward a Theory of Precedent in Arbitration’ 51 William and Mary Law Review (2010) 1895–1958.Google Scholar

Weiler (2005): Weiler, Todd, ‘Methanex Corp. v. USA: Turning the Page on NAFTA Chapter Eleven?’ 6 Journal of World Investment & Trade (2005) 903–20.Google Scholar

Weiler (2013): Weiler, Todd, The Interpretation of International Investment Law: Equality, Discrimination and Minimum Standards of Treatment in Historical Context (Leiden: Martinus Nijhoff 2013).Google Scholar

Weiler (2018): Weiler, Todd, ‘International Investment Law and International Human Rights Law: Reuniting Two Long Lost Siblings (Speaking Notes)’ 15 Transnational Dispute Management (2018).Google Scholar

Weiner (2003): Weiner, Allen S, ‘Indirect Expropriations: The Need for a Taxonomy of “Legitimate” Regulatory Purposes’ 5 International Law Forum (2003) 166–75.Google Scholar

Weisburd (1988): Weisburd, Arthur M, ‘Customary International Law: The Problem of Treaties’ 21 Vanderbilt Journal of Transnational Law (1988) 1–46.Google Scholar

Westberg (1993): Westberg, John A, ‘Applicable Law, Expropriatory Takings and Compensation in Cases of Expropriation; ICSID and Iran–United States Claims Tribunal Case Law Compared’ 8 ICSID Review – Foreign Investment Law Journal (1993) 1–28.Google Scholar

Weston (1975): Weston, Burns H, ‘“Constructive Takings” under International Law: A Modest Foray into the Problem of “Creeping Expropriation”’ 16 Virginia Journal of International Law (1975) 103–75.Google Scholar

Weyr (1922): Weyr, Franz, ‘Rechtsphilosophie und Rechtswissenschaft’ 2 Zeitschrift für öffentliches Recht (1922) 671–82.Google Scholar

Wiederin (1990): Wiederin, Ewald, ‘Was ist und welche Konsequenzen hat ein Normkonflikt?’ 21 Rechtstheorie (1990) 311–33.Google Scholar

Wiederin (1995): Wiederin, Ewald, Bundesrecht und Landesrecht: Zugleich ein Beitrag zu Strukturproblemen der bundesstaatlichen Kompetenzverteilung in Österreich und Deutschland (Vienna: Springer 1995).Google Scholar

Windscheid (1862): Windscheid, Bernhard, Lehrbuch des Pandektenrechts, vol 1 (Dusseldorf: Julius Buddeus 1862).Google Scholar

Winkler (1990): Winkler, Günther, Rechtstheorie und Erkenntnislehre: Kritische Anmerkungen zum Dilemma von Sein und Sollen in der Reinen Rechtslehre aus geistesgeschichtlicher und erkenntnistheoretischer Sicht (Vienna: Springer 1990).Google Scholar

Wolfke (1993): Wolfke, Karol, Custom in Present International Law (2nd edn, Dordrecht: Martinus Nijhoff 1993).Google Scholar

Wood (2014): Wood, Michael, Second Report on Identification of Customary International Law, UN Doc A/CN.4/L.672, 22 May 2014.Google Scholar

Wood (2015): Wood, Michael, Third Report on Identification of Customary International Law, UN Doc A/CN.4/682, 27 March 2015.Google Scholar

Wortley (1959): Wortley, Benjamin Alexander, Expropriation in Public International Law (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press 1959).Google Scholar

Yannaca-Small (2005): Catherine, Yannaca-Small, ‘“Indirect Expropriation” and the “Right to Regulate” in International Investment Law’ in OECD (ed.), International Investment Law: A Changing Landscape: A Companion Volume to International Investment Perspectives (Paris: OECD 2005) 43–72.Google Scholar

Zemanek (1995): Zemanek, Karl, ‘What Is State Practice and Who Makes It?’ in Beyerlin, Ulrich et al. (eds.), Recht zwischen Umbruch und Bewahrung: Völkerrecht, Europarecht, Staatsrecht: Festschrift für Rudolf Bernhardt (Berlin: Springer 1995) 289–306.Google Scholar

Zielonka (2017): Zielonka, Christian, Der Ausgleich zwischen Investorenschutz- und Regulierungsinteressen in internationalen Investitionsschutzabkommen (Berlin: Duncker & Humblot 2017).Google Scholar