Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-j824f Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-19T10:37:22.353Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

4 - Psychology of Human Intelligence in France and French-Speaking Switzerland

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 June 2012

Jacques Lautrey
Affiliation:
Université René Descartes, Paris
Anik de Ribaupierre
Affiliation:
Université de Genève
Robert J. Sternberg
Affiliation:
Yale University, Connecticut
Get access

Summary

INTRODUCTION

In France and in French-speaking Switzerland, research on intelligence has traditionally referred to a relatively wide range of studies. On the one hand, intelligence is studied by differentialists – differential psychology, in the Francophone tradition, refers to both psychometrics and to the study of individual differences, the latter referring both to fundamental and to applied issues – who devise and use tests of intelligence. On the other hand, because Piaget referred to the “development of intelligence,” it also includes developmental studies of cognition, in particular, the Piagetian studies. Currently, researchers working in the Piagetian tradition no longer consider that they work on intelligence, but this is a relatively recent shift. Thus, the study of intelligence is not restricted to the use of standardized tests of intelligence scales nor to interest in individual differences. For example, the Traité de Psychologie Expérimentale, first edited in 1963, devoted a whole volume to the study of intelligence (Oléron et al., 1963), three chapters of which consisted essentially of the presentation of the Piagetian theory by Piaget and collaborators. As in many other countries, experimental psychologists working with adults on reasoning, problem solving, language, or other cognitive functions do not consider that they are working on intelligence.

This chapter therefore reflects these fuzzy frontiers including the differential and the Piagetian traditions but not the other types of cognitive studies.

Type
Chapter
Information
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2004

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Ajuriaguerra, J., & Tissot, R. (1966). Application clinique de la psychologie génétique [Clinical application of genetic psychology]. In Psychologie et épistémologie génétiques. Thèmes piagétiens. [Genetic psychology and epistemology. Piagetian topics] (pp. 333–338). Paris: Dunod
Badan, M., Hauert, C.-A., & Mounoud, P. (2000). Sequential pointing in children and adults. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 75, 43–69CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bang, V. (1988). Textes choisis [Selected texts]. Genève: Université de Genève
Bideaud, J. (1988). Logique et bricolage [Logic and “handy doing”]. Lille: Presses Universitaires de Lille
Bideaud, J., & Lehalle, H. (Eds.). (2002). Le développement des activités numériques chez l'enfant [The development of numerical activities in children]. Paris: Hermès Science Publications
Binet, A. (1911a). Les idées modernes sur les enfants [The modern ideas on children]. Paris: Flammarion
Binet, A. (1911b). Nouvelles recherches sur la mesure du niveau intellectuel chez les enfants des écoles [New studies on the measurement of the intellectual level of children in schools]. L'Année Psychologique, 17, 145–201CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Binet, A., & Henri, V. (1895). La psychologie individuelle [Individual psychology]. L'Année Psychologique, 2, 415–465CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Binet, A., & Simon, T. (1905). Méthodes nouvelles pour le diagnostic du niveau intellectuel des anormaux [New methods for the diagnostic of the intellectual level of abnormal persons]. L'Année Psychologique, 11, 191–244CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Binet, A., & Simon, T. (1908). Le développement de l'intelligence chez les enfants [The development of intelligence in children]. L'Année Psychologique, 14, 1–94CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brown, A. L., Bransford, J., Ferrara, R. A., & Campione, J. C. (1983). Learning, remembering and understanding. In P. H. Mussen (Ed.), Handbook of child psychology (pp. 77–166). New York: Wiley
Bruchon-Schweitzer, M., & Ferrieux, D. (1991). Une enquête sur le recrutement en France [A survey on recruitment in France]. European Review of Applied Psychology, 41, 9–17Google Scholar
Büchel, F. P. (2000). Metacognitive control in analogical reasoning. In W. J. Perrig & A. Grob (Eds.), Control of human behavior. Mental processes and consciousness (pp. 203–224). New York: Wiley
Büchel, F. P. (2001). DELF: Un programme métacognitif pour adolescents en formation professionnelle [A metacognitive program for adolescents in occupational training]. In P.-A. Doudin, D. Martin, & O. Albanese (Eds.), Métacognition et éducation [Metacognition and education] (2e éd., pp. 141–162). Berne: P. Lang
Campione, J. C., & Brown, A. L. (1977). Memory and metamemory development in educable retarded children. In R. V. Kail & J. W. Hagen (Eds.), Perspectives on the development of memory and cognition (pp. 367–406). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum
Case, R. (1985). Intellectual development. Birth to adulthood. New York: Academic Press
Case, R. (1992). Neo-Piagetian theories of intellectual development. In H. Beilin & P. B. Pufall (Eds.), Piaget's theory: Prospects and possibilities (pp. 61–104). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum
Castro, D., Meljac, C., & Joubert, B. (1996). Pratiques et outils des cliniciens français. Les enseignements d'une enquête [Practices and tools of the French clinicians. The lessons of a survey]. Pratiques Psychologiques, 4, 73–80Google Scholar
Cattell, J. M. (1890). Mental tests and their measurement. Mind, 15, 373–380CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Claparède, E. (1905). Psychologie de l'enfant et pédagogie expérimentale: Aperçu des problèmes et des méthodes de la nouvelle pédagogie [Child psychology and experimental pedagogy: An overview of the problems and methods of the new pedagogy]. Genève: H. Kündig
Corroyer, D., & Rozencwajg, P. (1995). “Samuel,” un outil de diagnostic automatique des stratégies dans la tâche des cubes de Kohs [“Samuel,” a tool for automatic diagnostic of strategies in the Kohs block-design task]. (Windows software for compatible PC, written in Pascal-Delphi). Cergy, France: Delta-Expert. Available from: http://www.delta.expert.com
Cronbach, L. J. (1957). The two disciplines of scientific psychology. American Psychologist, 12, 671–684CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Demetriou, A. (Ed.). (1988). The Neo-Piagetian theories of cognitive development: Toward an integration. Amsterdam: North Holland
Dempster, F. N. (1992). The rise and fall of the inhibitory mechanism: Toward a unified theory of cognitive development and aging. Developmental Review, 12, 45–75CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dickes, P., & Martin, R. (1998). Les composantes de l'intelligence générale du D70 [Components of the general intelligence in the D70 test]. Psychologie et Psychométrie, 19, 27–51Google Scholar
Doise, W., & Mugny, G. (1984). The social development of the intellect. Oxford: Pergamon
Doise, W., Mugny, G., & Perez, J. A. (1998). The social construction of knowledge: Social marking and socio-cognitive conflict. In U. Flick (Ed.), The psychology of the social (pp. 77–90). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
Doudin, P. A. (1992). Une comparaison de sujets de 11–13 ans avec et sans difficultés scolaires: Variabilité intra et inter-individuelle du niveau d'acquisition opératoire [A comparison of 11–13 year-old children with and without school problems: Intra- and interindividual variability of the operational level]. Bulletin de Psychologie, 44, 47–55Google Scholar
Engle, R. W., Kane, M. J., & Tuholski, S. W. (1999). Individual differences in working memory capacity and what they tell us about controlled attention, general fluid intelligence, and functions of the prefrontal cortex. In A. Miyake & P. Shah (Eds.), Models of working memory. Mechanisms of active maintenance and executive control. (pp. 102–134). Cambridge: Cambridge University PressCrossRef
Feuerstein, R. (1979). The dynamic assessment of retarded performers. Baltimore: University Park Press
Gardner, H. (1983). Frames of mind: The theory of multiple intelligences. New York: Basic Books
Grégoire, J. (1992). Evaluer l'intelligence de l'enfant. Echelle de Wechsler pour enfants [Assessment of the child's intelligence. The Wechsler scale for children]. Liège: Margada
Grossen, M., & Perret-Clermont, A. N. (1994). Psychosocial perspective on cognitive development: Construction of adult-child intersubjectivity in logic tasks. In W. De Graaf & R. Maier (Eds.), Sociogenesis reexamined (pp. 243–260). New York: SpringerCrossRef
Houdé, O. (2000). Inhibition and cognitive development: Object, number, categorization, and reasoning. Cognitive Development, 15, 63–73CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Houdé, O., & Guichart, E. (2001). Negative priming effect after inhibition of number/length interference in a Piaget-like task. Developmental Science, 4, 119–123CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Houdé, O., Zago, L., Mellet, E., Moutier, S., Pineau, A., Mazoyer, B., & Tzourio-Mazoyer, N. (2000). Shifting from the perceptual brain to the logical brain: The neural impact of cognitive inhibition training. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 12, 721–728CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Huteau, M. (2002a). Le débat Binet-Toulouse et les débuts de la psychologie différentielle en France [The Binet-Toulouse debate and the beginnings of differential psychology in France]. In A. Flieller, C. Bocéréan, J.-L. Kop, E. Thiébaut, A.-M. Toniolo, & J. Tournois (Eds.), Questions de Psychologie Différentielle [Questions of differential psychology]. Rennes: Presses Universitaires de Rennes
Huteau, M. (2002b). Psychologie, psychiatrie et société sous la Troisième République. La biocratie d'Edouard Toulouse (1865–1947) [Psychology, psychiatry, and society under the third republic. The biocraty of Edouard Toulouse (1865–1947)]. Paris: L'Harmattan
Inhelder, B., & Piaget, J. (1971). Closing remarks. In D. R. Green, M. P. Ford, & G. B. Flammer (Eds.), Measurement and Piaget (pp. 210–213). New York: McGraw Hill
Inhelder, B. (1943/1963). Le diagnostic du raisonnement chez les débiles mentaux. [The diagnosis of reasoning in the mentally retarded]. Neuchâtel: Delachaux et Niestlé
Larivée, S., Normandeau, S., & Parent, S. (2000). The French connection: Some contributions of French-language research in the post-Piagetian era. Child Development, 71, 823–839CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Laurendeau, M., & Pinard, A. (1968). Les premières notions spatiales de l'enfant [The first spatial notions of the child]. Neuchâtel: Delachaux et Niestlé
Lautrey, J. (1993). Structure and variability: A plea for a pluralistic approach to cognitive development. In R. Case & W. Edelstein (Eds.), The new structuralism in cognitive development: Theory and research on individual pathways (pp. 101–114). Basel: Karger
Lautrey, J. (2003). A pluralistic approach to cognitive differenciation and development. In R. J. Sternberg, J. Lautrey, & T. Lubart (Eds.), Models of intelligence. International perspectives. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association
Lautrey, J., & Bideaud, J. (1985). Issues raised by training procedures in the study of cognitive development: The example of reasoning in inclusion tasks. In C. J. Brainerd & V. F. Reyna (Eds.), Developmental psychology (pp. 209–226). Amsterdam: North Holland
Lautrey, J., Bideaud, J., & Pierre-Puységur, M. A. (1986). Aspects génétiques et différentiels du fonctionnement cognitif lors des tâches de sériation [Genetic and differential aspects of cognitive functioning in seriation tasks]. L'Année Psychologique, 86, 489–526CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lautrey, J., & Caroff, X. (1996). Variability and cognitive development. Polish Quarterly of Developmental Psychology, 2, 71–89Google Scholar
Lautrey, J., Ribaupierre, A., & Rieben, L. (1986). Les différences dans la forme du développement cognitif évalué avec des épreuves piagétiennes: Une application de l'analyse des correspondances [Differences in the form of cognitive development assessed with Piagetian tasks: An application of correspondence analysis]. Cahiers de Psychologie Cognitive, 6, 575–613Google Scholar
Lécuyer, R., & Streri, A. (1994). How should intelligence be characterized in the infant? In A. Vyt, H. Bloch, & M. H. Bornstein (Eds.), Francophone perspectives in mental development. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum
Lezak, M. D. (1995). Neuropsychological assessment (3rd ed.). New York: Oxford University Press
Loarer, E. (2003). Cognitive training for individuals with deficits. In R. J. Sternberg, J. Lautrey, & T. Lubart (Eds.), Models of intelligence. International perspectives. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association
Longeot, F. (1969). Psychologie différentielle et théorie opératoire de l'intelligence [Differential psychology and operatory theory of intelligence]. Paris: Dunod
Longeot, F. (1978). Les stades opératoires de Piaget et les facteurs de l'intelligence [Piaget's operatory stages and the factors of intelligence]. Grenoble: Presses Universitaires de France
Miyake, A., & Shah, P. (Eds.). (1999). Models of working memory. Mechanisms of active maintenance and executive control. Cambridge: Cambridge University PressCrossRef
Montangero, J. (1984). Perspectives actuelles sur la psychogenèse du temps [Current perspectives on the psychogenesis of time]. L'Année Psychologique, 84, 433–460CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Montangero, J. (1996a). Understanding changes in time. London: Taylor & Francis
Montangero, J. (1996b). Understanding things along the time dimension: An adequate developmental approach can provide partial explanations of behavior. Swiss Journal of Psychology, 55, 104–111Google Scholar
Mounoud, P. (1993). The emergence of new skills: Dialectic relations between knowledge systems. In G. J. P. Savelsbergh (Ed.), The development of coordination in infancy (pp. 13–46). Amsterdam: North HollandCrossRef
Mounoud, P. (1995). From direct to reflexive (self-)knowledge: A recursive model. About (self-produced) actions considered as transformations. In P. Rochat (Ed.), The self in early infancy: Theory and research (pp. 141–160). Amsterdam: Elsevier Science PublishersCrossRef
Mounoud, P., & Hauert, C. A. (1982). Sensorimotor and postural behaviors: Their relation to cognitive development. In W. H. Hartup (Ed.), Review of child development (pp. 101–132). Chicago: The University of Chicago Press
Mounoud, P., Viviani, P., Hauert, C.-A., & Guyon, J. (1985). Development of visuo-manual tracking in the 5- to 9 year-old child and the adult. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 40, 115–132CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mugny, G., & Carugati, F. (1989). Social representations of intelligence. New York
Nassefat, M. (1963). Etude quantitative sur l'évolution des opérations intellectuelles [Quantitative study of the evolution of intellectual operations]. Neuchâtel: Delachaux & Niestlé
Oléron, P., Piaget, J., Inhelder, B., & Gréco, P. (1963). Traité de psychologie expérimentale (Vol. 7). L'intelligence. [Experimental psychology, its scope and method (Vol. 7). Intelligence]. Paris: Presses Universitaires de France [(1969)
Paour, J.-L. (1992). Induction of logic structures in the mentally retarded: An assessment and intervention instrument. In H. C. Haywood & D. Tzuriel (Eds.), Interactive assessment. New York: SpringerCrossRef
Paour, J.-L. (2001). From structural diagnosis to functional diagnosis of reasoning: A dynamic conception of mental retardation. In A. Tryphon & J. Vonèche (Eds.), Working with Piaget. Essays in honour of Bärbel Inhelder. London: Psychology Press
Paour, J.-L., Cèbe, S., &Haywood, H. C. (2000). Learning to learn in preschool education: Effect on later school achievement. Journal of Cognitive Education and Psychology, 1, 3–25Google Scholar
Paour, J.-L., & Soavi, G. (1992). A case study in the induction of logic structures. In H. C. Haywood & D. Tzuriel (Eds.), Interactive assessment. New York: SpringerCrossRef
Pascual-Leone, J. (1987). Organismic processes for neo-Piagetian theories: A dialectical causal account of cognitive development. International Journal of Psychology, 22, 531–570CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Perret-Clermont, A. N. (1980). Social interaction and cognitive development in children. London: Academic Press
Piaget, J. (1947). La psychologie de l'intelligence [The psychology of intelligence]. Paris: Armand Colin
Piaget, J. (1970). Piaget's theory. In P. H. Mussen (Ed.), Carmichael's manual of child psychology (3rd ed., Vol. 1). London: Wiley
Piaget, J. (1972). Intellectual evolution from adolescence to adulthood. Human Development, 15, 1–12CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Piaget, J., & Inhelder, B. (1966). La psychologie de l'enfant [The psychology of the child]. Paris: Presses Universitaires de France
Piéron, H., & Piéron, M. (1930). Instructions pour la fiche psychologique d'orientation professionnelle [Instructions for the psychological form of vocational guidance]. Bulletin de l'Institut National d'Orientation, 2, 197–206Google Scholar
Poirier, C., Lécuyer, R., & Cybula, C. (2000). Categorization of geometric figures composed of three or four elements by 3-month-old infants. Cahiers de Psychologie cognitive, 19, 221–244Google Scholar
Raison (La). (1952). Cahiers de psychopathologie scientifique. Numéro spécial consacré à la psychologie [Scientific psychopathology. Special issue devoted to psychology], n°4, 3–27
Rémy, L. (2001). Etude des stratégies de résolution d'une épreuve d'intelligence générale: Variabilité intra-individuelle et différences interindividuelles [Study of the strategies of resolution in a task of general intelligence: Intraindividual variability and individual differences]. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Université de Provence, Aix-en-Provence, France
Rémy, L., & Gilles, P.-Y. (1999). Stratégies de résolution spatiale et numérique du D70 [Spatial and numerical strategies of resolution in the D70 test]. In M. Huteau & J. Lautrey (Eds.), Approches différentielles en psychologie [Differential perspectives in psychology]. Rennes: Presses Universitaires de Rennes
Reuchlin, M. (1964). L'intelligence: Conception génétique opératoire et conception factorielle [Intelligence: Genetic, operatory, and factorial approaches]. Revue Suisse de Psychologie Pure et Appliquée, 23, 113–134Google Scholar
Reuchlin, M. (1978). Processus vicariants et différences individuelles [Vicarious processes and individual differences]. Journal de Psychologie, 2, 133–145Google Scholar
Rey, A. (1958). L'examen clinique en psychologie [The clinical assessment in psychology]. Paris: Presses Universitaires de France
Rey, A. (1963). Connaissance de l'individu par les tests [The knowledge of the individual by the tests]. Bruxelles: Charles Dessart
de Ribaupierre, A. (1993). Structural and individual differences: On the difficulty of dissociating developmental and differential processes. In R. Case & W. Edelstein (Eds.), The new structuralism in cognitive development: Theory and research on individual pathways (pp. 11–32). Basel: Karger
de Ribaupierre, A. (2000). Working memory and attentional control. In W. Perrig & A. Grob (Eds.), Control of human behavior, mental processes, and consciousness (pp. 147–164). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum
de Ribaupierre, A. (2002). Working memory and attentional processes across the lifespan. In P. Graf & N. Ohta (Eds.), Lifespan development of human memory (pp. 59–80). Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press
de Ribaupierre, A., & Bailleux, C. (1995). Development of attentional capacity in childhood: A longitudinal study. In F. E.Weinert & W. Schneider (Eds.), Memory performance and competencies: Issues in growth and development (pp. 45–70). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum
Ribaupierre, A., & Rieben, L. (1987). Investigation psychologique et épreuves piagétiennes: Des aspects structuraux aux contrôles exécutifs [Psychological examination and Piagetian tasks: From structural aspects to executive controls]. Revue Suisse de Psychologie, 46, 41–54Google Scholar
Ribaupierre, A., & Rieben, L. (1995). Individual and situational variability in cognitive development. Educational Psychologist, 30, 5–14CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ribaupierre, A., Rieben, L., & Lautrey, J. (1991). Developmental change and individual differences. A longitudinal study using Piagetian tasks. Genetic, Social, and General Psychology Monographs, 117, 285–311Google Scholar
Richard, J.-F., & Zamani, M. (2003). A problem-solving model as a tool for analyzing adaptive behavior. In R. J. Sternberg, J. Lautrey, & T. Lubart (Eds.), Models of intelligence. International perspectives. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association
Rieben, L., de Ribaupierre, A., & Lautrey, J. (1983). Le développement opératoire de l'enfant entre 6 et 12 ans. Elaboration d'un instrument d'évaluation [The operational development of the 6- to 12-year-old child. Development of an assessment tool]. Paris: Editions du CNRSCrossRef
Rieben, L., Ribaupierre, A., & Lautrey, J. (1985). Le fonctionnement cognitif d'adolescents fréquentant des écoles de formation préprofessionnelle [The cognitive functioning of adolescents attending pre-occupational training schools]. Revue Suisse de Psychologie, 44, 119–133Google Scholar
Rieben, L., Ribaupierre, A., & Lautrey, J. (1990). Structural invariants and individual modes of processing: On the necessity of a minimally structuralist approach of development for education. Archives de Psychologie, 58, 29–53Google Scholar
Rozencwajg, P. (1991). Analysis of problem solving strategies on the Kohs block design test. European Journal of Psychology of Education, 1, 73–88CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rozencwajg, P., & Corroyer, D. (2002). Strategy development in a block design task. Intelligence, 30, 1–25CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schubauer-Leoni, M. L., & Perret-Clermont, A. N. (1997). Social interactions and mathematics learning. In T. Nunes & P. Bryant (Eds.), Learning and teaching mathematics. An international perspective (pp. 265–283). Hove: Psychology Press
Seron, X. (1993). La neuropsychologie cognitive [Cognitive neuropsychology]. (2nd. ed.) Paris: Presses Universitaires de France
Streri, A., & Molina, M. (1993). Visual-tactual and tactual-visual transfer between objects and pictures in 2-month-old infants. Perception, 22, 1299–1318CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Tort, M. (1974). Le quotient intellectuel [The intellectual quotient]. Paris: Maspero
Toulouse, E., & Piéron, H. (1911). Technique de Psychologie Expérimentale de Toulouse, Piéron et Vaschide [Techniques of experimental psychology of Toulouse, Piéron, and Vaschide]. Paris: Douin
Toulouse, E., Vaschide, N., & Piéron, H. (1904). Technique de Psychologie Expérimentale [Techniques of Experimental Psychology]. Paris: Douin
Zamani, M., & Richard, J. F. (2000). Object encoding, goal similarity, and analogical transfer. Memory and Cognition, 28, 873–886CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Zazzo, R., Gilly, M., & Verba-Read (1966). Nouvelle échelle métrique de l'intelligence [New metric scale of intelligence]. Paris: Colin
Zesiger, P., Mounoud, P., & Hauert, C.-A. (1993). Effects of lexicality and trigram frequency on handwriting production in children and adults. Acta Psychologica, 82, 353–365CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure [email protected] is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×