Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-j824f Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-19T10:24:50.431Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

2 - Intelligence – Theory, Research, and Testing in the Nordic Countries

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 June 2012

Berit Carlstedt
Affiliation:
National Defence College, Sweden
Jan-Eric Gustafsson
Affiliation:
Göteborg University, Sweden
Jarkko Hautamäki
Affiliation:
Helsinki University
Robert J. Sternberg
Affiliation:
Yale University, Connecticut
Get access

Summary

INTRODUCTION

This chapter describes research on intelligence and practices of assessment in the Nordic countries. For the purposes of this chapter, the Nordic group of countries is taken to comprise Denmark, Finland, Norway and Sweden. These four small (between 4 and 9 million persons) countries, share many characteristics. Three of the countries (Denmark, Norway, and Sweden) have highly similar languages, which are typically understood across countries. The fourth country (Finland) has a Swedish-speaking minority, while the main language (Finnish) is a quite different language than the other languages. All countries also have a high standard of living and are what is often referred to as “welfare states,” with societal solutions to problems such as medicine, health care, unemployment, and education. From a cultural point of view, there are also are many similarities among the four countries, which go far back in history.

DEFINITIONS AND MEASUREMENT OF INTELLIGENCE IN THE NORDIC COUNTRIES

Conceptions of intelligence in the Nordic countries have been very strongly influenced by the psychometric research traditions that were developed in Britain, the United States, and elsewhere. There has, thus, been a strong focus on development and adaptation of tools for measuring intelligence and on empirical approaches in research on intelligence.

DEVELOPMENT OF TESTING

As was observed by Carroll (1982), the fundamental principles of the technology of intelligence testing were well established by the 1930s, whereas the development after this time may be described as elaborations, extensions, and refinements of these basic principles.

Type
Chapter
Information
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2004

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Åberg-Bengtsson, L. (1999). Dimensions of performance in the interpretation of diagrams, tables, and maps: Some gender differences in the Swedish Scholastic Aptitude Test. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 36, 565–5823.0.CO;2-L>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ahmavaara, Y. (1954). Transformation analysis of factorial data and other new analytical methods of differential psychology with their application to Thurstone's basic studies. Annales Academiae Scientiarum Fennicae, B 88.2
Ahmavaava, Y. (1957a). On the unified factor theory of mind. Annales Academiae Scientiarum Fennicae, B 106
Ahmavaara, Y. (1957b). The structure of mental abilities. Helsinki: WSOY (In Finnish)
Ahmavaara, Y. (1963). On the mathematical theory of transformation analysis. Publication of the Finnish Foundation of Alcohol Studies, No. 1/63
AVO (1981). The Great Study 1948. Publication of the Office of Vocational Guidance, No. 33. Helsinki: Office of Vocational Guidance
Balke-Aurell, G. (1982). Changes in ability as related to educational and occupational experience. Göteborg, Sweden: Acta Universitatis Gothoburgensis
Beverfelt, E., Nordvik, H., & Nygård, A. (1967). WAIShåndbog, Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale. [WAIS handbook, Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale]. Oslo: Norsk Psykologforening
Binet, A., & Simon, T. (1905). Méthodes nouvelles pour le diagnostic du niveau intellectuel des anormaux [New methods for diagnosing the intellectual level of abnormals]. L' Année Psychologique, 11, 191–336CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Binet, A., & Simon, T. (1908). Le développment de l'intelligence chez les enfants [The development of intelligence in children]. Année Psychologique, 14, 1–94CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Björsjö, M. (1951). Om spatial, teknisk och praktisk begåvning. [On spatial, technical, and practical abilities]. Göteborg: Elanders
Carlstedt, B. (2000). Cognitive abilities – aspects of structure, process, and measurement. Göteborg, Sweden: Acta Universitatis Gothoburgensis
Carlstedt, B.(2001). Differentiation of cognitive abilities as a function of level of general intelligence: A latent variable approach. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 36(4), 589–609CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Carlstedt, B., Gustafsson, J.-E., & Ullstadius, E. (2000). Item sequencing effects on the measurement of fluid intelligence. Intelligence, 28(2), 145–160CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carlstedt, L., & Widén, H. (1999). Militärhögskoleprovet – manual [The officer selection test – manual]. Report LI-T:22. Karlstad, Sweden: National Defence College
Carroll, J. B. (1982). The measurement of intelligence. In R. J. Sternberg (Ed.), Handbook of human intelligence (pp. 29–120). New York: Cambridge University Press
Carroll, J. B. (1993). Human cognitive abilities. A survey of factor-analytic studies. Cambridge: Cambridge University PressCrossRef
Carroll, J. B. (2003). The higher-stratum structure of cognitive abilities: There is a G, but no Gf. In H. Nyborg (Ed.) The scientific study of general intelligence: Tribute to Arthur R. Jensen. Elsevier Science/Pergamon PressCrossRef
Dureman, I., & Sälde, H. (1959). Psykometriska och experientalpsykologiska metoder för klinisk tillämpning [Psychometric and experimental methods for the clinical evaluation of mental functioning]. Stockholm, Sweden: Almqvist & Wiksell
Eckhoff, R. (1978). Raven's Standard Progressive Matrices. Rapport fra Normeringsarbeid. Unpublished manuscript. Arbeidspsykologisk Institutt, Oslo
Elonen, A. S., Takala, M., & Ruoppila, I. (1963). A study of intellectual functions in children by means of theKTKperformance scales. Jyväskylä studies in Education, Psychology, and Social research, 3
Emanuelsson, I., Reuterberg, S.-E., & Svensson, A. (1993). Changing differences in intelligence. Comparisons between groups of 13-year-olds tested from 1960 to 1990. Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research, 37, 259–277CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Engvik, H., Hjerkin, O., & Seim, S. (1980). HåndbogWAIS. Norsk utgave. [WAIS handbook. Norwegian edition]. Oslo: Norsk Psykologförening
Ensiö, A. (1917). Oppikoulujen pohjakoulukysymys Suomessa [The Basic Educational Requirements for Gymnasia]. Turku: Author
Finkel, D., Pedersen, N. L., McGue, M., & McClearn, G. E. (1995). Heritability of cognitive abilities in adult twins: Comparison of Minnesota and Swedish data. Behavior Genetics, 25, 421–431CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Flynn, J. R. (1984). The mean IQ of Americans: Massive gains 1932 to 1978. Psychological Bulletin, 95, 29–51CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Furu, M. (2000). The Malmo Study. In C.-G. Jansson (Ed.), Seven Swedish longitudinal studies in the behavioral sciences. Stockhom, Sweden: Swedish Council for Planning and Coordination of Research
Gagnerud, S., & Haglund, B. (2000). Begåvningsstruktur och prognosvärde. [Structure of abilities and predictive validity]. Rapport till Styrgruppen för APU, National Labour Market Board
Gjessing, H. J., Nygaard, H. D., & Solheim, R. (1975). Illinois Test of Psycholinguistic Abilities. Handbok med instruktioner og normer [Illinois Test of Psycholinguistic Abilities. Handbook with instructions and norms] Oslo, Norway: Universitetsforlaget
Gustafsson, J.-E. (1984). A unifying model for the structure of intellectual abilities. Intelligence, 8, 179–203CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gustafsson, J.-E. (1988). Hierarchical models of individual differences in cognitive abilities. In R. J. Sternberg (Ed.), Advances in the psychology of human intelligence (Vol. 4, pp. 35–71). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum
Gustafsson, J.-E. (2001). Schooling and intelligence: Effects of track of study on level and profile of cognitive abilities. Paper presented at the Spearman Conference, Sydney, Nov 28–30, 2001
Gustafsson, J.-E., & Balke, G. (1993). General and specific abilities as predictors of school achievement. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 28(4), 407–434CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gustafsson, J.-E., & Westerlund, A. (1994). Socialgruppsskillnader i prestationer på Högskoleprovet [Differences between socio-economic groups in performance on the Swedish Scholastic Aptitude Test]. In R. Eriksson & J. O. Jonsson (Eds.), Sorteringen i skolan. Studier av snedrekrytering och utbildningens konsekvenser. Stockholm, Sweden: Carlsson Bokförlag
Gustafsson, J.-E., & Reuterberg, S.-E. (2000). Metodproblem vid studier av Högskoleprovets prognosförmåga – och deras lösning! [Methodological problems when studying the predictive validity of the SWE-SAT – and the solution!]Pedagogisk Forskning i Sverige, 5(4), 273–283Google Scholar
Gustafsson, J.-E., & Undheim, J. O. (1992). Stability and change in broad and narrow factors of intelligence from ages 12 to 15 years. Journal of Educational Psychology, 84(2), 141–149CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gustafsson, J.-E., & Undheim, J. O. (1996). Individual differences in cognitive functions. In D. C. Berliner & R. C. Calfee (Eds.), Handbook of educational psychology (pp. 186–242). New York: Macmillan
Gustafsson, J.-E., Wedman, I., & Westerlund, A. (1992). The dimensionality of the Swedish Scholastic Aptitude Test. Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research, 36(1), 21–39CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Haavisto, M.-L., & Oksama, L. (1997). F/A 18 tutkatorjuntatehtävän tehtä-väanalyysi [The task analysis of F/A 18 radar attack missions]. Unpublished manuscript
Haavisto, M.-L., & Lehto, J. (2003). Fluid and crystallized intelligence in relation to domain-specific Working Memory: A latent-variable approach. Submitted
Hagtvet, K. A., & Undheim, J.-O. (1988). The Norwegian experience of test use: A selective review of Norwegian tests and measurements in cultural context. In S. H. Irvine & J. W. Berry (Eds.), Human abilities in cultural context. New York: Cambridge University PressCrossRef
Härnqvist, K. (1960). Manual till DBA – differentiell begåvningsanalys [Manual for DBA – Differential Aptitudes Battery]. Stockholm, Sweden: Skandinaviska Testförlaget
Härnqvist, K. (1968a). Relative changes in intelligence from 13–18. I. Background and methodology. Scandinavian Journal of Psychology, 9, 50–64CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Härnqvist, K. (1968b). Relative changes in intelligence from 13–18. II. Results. Scandinavian Journal of Psychology, 9, 65–82CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Härnqvist, K. (2000). Evaluation through follow-up: A longitudinal program for studying education and career development. In C.-G. Jansson (Ed.), Seven Swedish longitudinal studies in the behavioral sciences. Stockhom, Sweden: Swedish Council for Planning and Coordination of Research
Härnqvist, K., & Stahle, G. (1977). An ecological analysis of test score changes over time. Institute of Education, University of Gothenburg, Report No. 64
Hautamäki, J. (1989). The application of a Rasch model on Piagetian measures of thinking. In P. Adey, J. Bliss, J. Head, & M. Shayer (Eds.), Adolescent development and school science. London: Falmers
Hautamäki, J. (1999). Epidemiology of Excellence – an assessment of the commitment to thinking with Sternberg triarchic ability test. In Potential into performance, (pp. 20–23). QCA Ref: QCA/99/400. London: Qualifications and Curriculum Authority (QCA)
Hautamäki, J. Arinen, P., Bergholm, B., Hautamäki, A., Kupiainen, S., Kuusela, J., Lehto, J., Niemivirta, M., & Scheinin, P. (1999). Learning-to-learn: The 6th graders (in Finnish). Publications 3/1999. Helsinki: National Board of Education
Hautamäki, J. Arinen, P., Hautamäki, A., Ikonen-Varila, M., Kupiainen, S., Lindblom, B., Niemivirta, M., Rantanen, P., Ruuth, M., & Scheinin, P. (2000). Learning-to-learn: The 9th graders (in Finnish). Publications 7/2000. Helsinki: National Board of Education
Hellesnes, T., Raaheim, K., & Bengtsson, G. (1982). Attempts to predict intelligent behavior: III. The relative importance of divergent and convergent production. Scandinavian Journal of Psychology, 23(4), 263–266CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hellström, A. (1960). Intelligensmätning (Lewis M. Terman and Maud A. Merrill). Stockholm, Sweden: Föreningen Sävstaholmsskolorna
Henrysson, S. (1962). The relation between factor loadings and biserial correlations in item analysis. Psychometrika, 27, 419–424CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Husén, T. (1948). Konstruktion och standardisering av svenska krigsmaktens inskrivningsprov. 1948 års version [Construction and standardization of the Swedish Armed Forces' Enlistment battery, 1948 version]. Lund, Sweden: Håkan Ohlssons Boktryckeri
Husén, T. (1950). Testresultatens prognosvärde [The predictive validity of test results]. Stockholm: Almqvist & Wiksell
Husén, T. (1951). The influence of schooling upon IQ. Theoria, 17, 61–88CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Husén, T., & Tuijnman, A. (1991). The contribution of formal schooling to the increase in intellectual capital. Educational Researcher, 20(1), 17–25CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jaederholm, G. (1914). Undersökningar över intelligensmätningarnas teori och praxis [Investigations concerning the theory and practice of measurement of intelligence]. Stockholm, Sweden: Almqvist & Wikzell
Jansson, C.-G. (2000). Seven Swedish longitudinal studies in the behavioral sciences. Stockholm, Sweden: Swedish Council for Planning and Coordination of Research
Jöreskog, K. G. (1967). Some contributions to maximum likelihood factor analysis. Psychometrika, 32(4), 443–482CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jöreskog, K. G. (1969). A general approach to confirmatory maximum likelihood factor analysis. Psychometrika, 34(2), 183–202CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jöreskog, K. G. (1970). A general method for analysis of covariance structures. Biometrika, 57, 239–251CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jöreskog, K. G. (1971). Simulatenous factor analysis in several populations. Psychometrika, 36, 409–426CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jöreskog, K. G. (1973). A general method for estimating a linear structural equation system. In: O. D. Duncan & A. S. Goldberger (Eds.), Structural equation models in the social sciences (pp. 85–112). New York: Seminar Press
Jöreskog, K. G., & Sörbom, D. (1973). LISRELIII – Estimation of linear structu-ral equation systems by maximum likelihood methods. AFORTRANIV program
Jöreskog, K. G., Sörbom, D., Du Toit, S., & Du Toit, M. (2001). LISREL8: New statistical features (Third printing with revisions). Chicago: Scientific Software International
Kebbon, L. (1968). Manual tillUS-batteriet [Manual for the US-battery]. Stockholm: Skandinaviska Testförlaget
Korkiakangas, M. (1977). Factor analytic methodology in Finnish psychological studies in the 40's and 50's. Psykologia, 12(1), 3–12Google Scholar
Koskenniemi, M. (1938). Älykkyystutkimuksen menetelmät [Methods of Intelligence Research]. Porvoo: WSOY
Kuusinen, J., & Blåfield, L. (1972). ITPA– theory, characteristics, and use (in Finnish). Publications 156/72. Institute for Educational Research, University of Jyväskylä
Kuusinen, J., & Leskinen, E. (1988). Latent structure analysis of longitudinal data on relations between intellectual abilities and school achievement. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 23, 103–188CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Langset, M. (1984). Håndbok forWPPSI. Norsk utgave. [WPPSI handbook. Norwegian edition]. Oslo, Norway: Norsk Psykologforening
Lehtovaara, A. (1960). Stanford-Binet type of tests for the assessment of intelligence of children and adults (standardized for Finnish circumstances). Publications 7/1960. The Central Union for the Protection of Children
Lilius, A. (1913). Något om intelligensundersökningar [Measuring intelligence]. Tidskrift utg. Af Pedagogiska föreningen i Finland
Lilius, A. (1916). Skolålderns själsliv [The intellectual life of school-aged children]. Borgå: Holger Schildts Förlag
Lofthus, J. (1931). Intelligensmåling [Measurement of intelligence]. Oslo
Looft, C. (1913). Intelligensundersökelser av skolbarn [Investigations of intelligence among school children]. Medicinsk Revue, 569–585Google Scholar
Lund, T., & Thrane, V. C. (1983). Schooling and intelligence: A methodological and longitudinal study. Scandinavian Journal of Psychology, 24, 161–173CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Magnusson, D. (1961). Testteori [Test theory]. Stockholm, Sweden: Almqvist och Wiksell/Gebers Förlag
Mårdberg, B., & Carlstedt, B. (1998). Swedish Enlistment Battery (SEB): Construct validity and latent variable estimation of cognitive abilities by the CAT-SEB. International Journal of Selection and Assessment, 6(2), 107–114CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mårdberg, B., Sjöberg, A., & Henrysson Eidvall, S. (2000). BasIQ begåvningstest. Manual [BasIQ test of cognitive abilities. Manual]. Stockholm: Psykologiförlaget AB
McClearn, G. E., Johansson, B., Berg, S., Pedersen, N. L., Ahern, F., Perrill, S. A., & Plomin, R. (1997). Substantial genetic influence on cognitive abilities in twins 80 or more years old. Science, 276, 1560–1563CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Messick, S. (1989). Validity. In R. L. Linn (Ed.), Educational measurement (pp. 13–103). New York: MacMillan
Mönnesland, K. (1948). Intelligenspröver for voksne. [Intelligence tests for adults]. Oslo, Norway: Norli
Mortensen, E. L., Reinisch, J. M., & Teasdale, T. W. (1989). Intelligence as measured by the WAIS and a military draft board group test. Scandinavian Journal of Psychology, 30, 315–318CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Partanen, J., Bruun, K., & Markkanen, T. (1966). Inheritance of drinking behavior. A study on intelligence, personality, and use of alcohol of adult twins. Alcohol research in the Northern countries, Studies 14. Helsinki: The Finnish Foundation for Alcohol Studies
Pedersen, N. L., Plomin, R., Nesselroade, J. R., & McClearn, G. E. (1992). A quantitative genetic analysis of cognitive abilities during the second half of the life span. Psychological Science, 3, 346–353CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pedersen, N., & Lichtenstein, P. (2000). The Swedish Twin Registry. A presentation. In B. Smedby, I. Lundberg, & T. Sörensen (Eds.) Scientific evaluation of the Swedish Twin Registry. Stockholm: Swedish Council for Planning and Coordination of Research, report 2000:10
Psykotekniska Institutet (1970). DELTA batteriet [The DELTA-battery]. Stockholm, Sweden: Psykologiförlaget
Raaheim, K. (1988). Intelligence and task novelty. In R. J. Sternberg (Ed.), Advances in the psychology of human intelligence, (Vol. 4, pp. 73–97). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum
Raaheim, K. (1991). Is the high IQ person really in trouble? Why? In H. A. H. Rowe (Ed.), Intelligence, reconceptualization and measurement (pp. 35–46). Camberwell, Australia: Australian Council for Educational Research, Ltd
Rasch, G. (1960). Probabilistic models for some intelligence and attainment tests. Copenhagen, Denmark: Danish Institute for Educational Research
Rasch, G. (1966). An item analysis which takes individual differences into account. British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology, 19, 49–57CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Räty, H., Pölönen, K., Pölönen, P., & Snellman, L. (1995). Student assessment and definition of intelligence: A historical perspective. Psykologia, 30, 179–185Google Scholar
Räty, H., & Snellman, L. (1992). Does gender make any difference? Common sense conceptions of intelligence. Social Behavior and Personality, 20, 23–34CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Räty, H., & Snellman, L. (1998). Social representation of educability. Social Psychology of Education, 1, 359–373CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reuterberg, S.-E. (1998). On differential selection in the Swedish Scholastic Aptitude test. Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research, 41(2), 81–92CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ribsskog, B. (1941). Evnepröver for 1. klasse i folkeskolen. Standardisert på grunnlag av Kuhlmann-Andersons gruppepröver [Ability tests for grade 1 of compulsory school. Standardized on the basis of the Kuhlmann-Anderson group test]. Oslo
Riis, E. (1988). Militaerpsykologin I Norge [Military psychology in Norway]. Tidsskrift for Norsk psykologforening, 23, 21–37Google Scholar
Rist, T. (1982). Det intellektuelle prestationsnivået I befolkningen sett i lys av den samfunnsmessiga utvecklinga. En unders⊘kelse av norske rekrutters prestationer på psykologiske sesjonspr⊘ver [The intellectual level in the population seen in the light of the development of society. Norwegian recruits' results on the draft board tests]. Forsvarets Psykologitjeneste, Oslo
Rosén, M. (1998). Gender differences in patterns of knowledge. Göteborg, Sweden: Acta Universitatis Gothoburgensis
Rosenqvist, A. (1919). Kasvatus ja koulu [How to take into account the giftedness of pupils at school.]Education and School (in Finnish), 5, 56–65Google Scholar
Sandven, J. (1954). Norsk standard av Terman-Merrill Stanford-revisjon av Binet-prövene [Norwegian standardization of the Terman-Merrill revision of the Binet tests]. Oslo, Norway: Cappelen
Salomaa, J. E. (1938). Älykkyyden mittaaminen [The measurement of intelligence]. Porvoo: WSOY
Scheinin, P., & Mehtäläinen, J. (1999). Applying the theory of knowledge to teaching thinking. In J. H. M. Hamers, J. E. H. van Luit, & B. Csapo, (Eds.), Teaching and learning thinking skills. Lisse: Swets & Zeitlinger
Siegvald, H. (1944). Experimentella undersökningar rörande intellektuella könsdifferenser [Experimental investigations concerning intellectual sex differences]. Lund, Sweden: Håkan Olssons Boktryckeri
Sinivou, J. (1977). Ilmavoimien varusmiesohjaaja- ja lentokadettikurssilla menestymisen ennustamisesta: Sotilasohjaajan ammattianalyysi ja valintajärjestelmän kehittämismahdollisuudet [The predictors of success in the training of Finnish Air Force conscripts and cadets: The occupational analysis and the future scenarios of developing the selection system]. Military Psychological Series of Publications, 9/A/77. Helsinki: Pääesikunta
Spearman, C. (1904a). The proof and measurement of association between two things. American Journal of Psychology, 15, 72–101CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Spearman, C. (1904b). “General intelligence,” objectively determined and measured. American Journal of Psychology, 15, 201–293CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Spelling, K. (1999). Danish Ability Test. Psykologisk paedagogisk Radgivning, 29(2), 127–132Google Scholar
Sternberg, R. J., Castejon, J. L., Prieto, M. D., Hautamäki, J., & Grigorenko, E. (2001). Confirmatory factor analysis of the Sternberg Triarchic Ability Test (multiple-choice items) in three international samples: An empirical test of the triarchic theory of intelligence. European Journal of Psychological Assessment, 17(1), 1–16CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sundet, J. M., Tambs, K., & Magnus, P. (1981). Heritability analysis as a means of analyzing the effects of social changes on psychological variables. An empirical study of IQ-scores. Psychiatry and Social Sciences, 1, 241–248Google Scholar
Takala, M. (1953). Studies of psychomotor personality tests. Helsinki: Institute of Occupational Health
Teasdale, T. W., & Owen, D. R. (1984). Heredity and familial environment in intelligence and educational level: A sibling study. Nature, 309, 620–622CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Teasdale, T. W., & Owen, D. R. (1987). National secular trends in intelligence and education: A 20-year cross sectional study. Nature, 325, 119–121CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Teasdale, T. W., & Owen, D. R. (1989). Continuing secular increases in intelligence and a stable prevalence of high intelligence levels. Intelligence, 13, 255–262CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Teasdale, T. W., & Owen, D. R. (1994). Thirty-year secular trends in the cognitive abilities of Danish male school leavers at a high educational level. Scandinavian Journal of Psychology, 35, 328–335CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Teasdale, T. W., & Owen, D. R. (2000). Forty-year secular trends in cognitive abilities. Intelligence, 28, 115–120CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thurstone, L. L. (1931). Multiple factor analysis. Psychological Review, 38, 406–427CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thurstone, L. L. (1938). Primary mental abilities. Psychometric Monographs, No. 1Google Scholar
Thurstone, L. L. (1947). Multiple factor analysis. Chicago: University of Chicago Press
Torjussen, T. M., & Hansen, I. (1999). Forsvaret best i test? Bruk av psykologiske tester i forsvaret, med speciell vekt på flygerseleksjon [Is the Defense best in test? Use of psychological tests in the Defense with special weight on pilot selection.]Tidsskrift for Norsk Psykologförening, 36(8), 772–779Google Scholar
Ullstadius, E., Gustafsson, J.-E., & Carlstedt, B. (2002). Influence of general and crystallized intelligence on vocabulary test performance. European Journal of Psychological Assessment, 18(1), 78–84CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Undheim, J. O. (1978a). WISC-R håndbog. Norsk utgave [WISC-R handbook. Norwegian edition]. Oslo, Norway: Norsk Psykologforening
Undheim, J. O. (1978b). Broad ability factors in 12- to 13-year-old children, the theory of fluid and crystallized intelligence and the differentiation hypothesis. Journal of Educational Psychology, 70(3), 433–443CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Undheim, J. O. (1979). Capitalization on chance: The case of Guilford's memory abilities. Scandinavian Journal of Psychology, 20, 71–76CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Undheim, J. O. (1981a). On intelligence: II. A neo-Spearman model to replace Cattell's theory of fluid and crystallized intelligence. Scandinavian Journal of Psychology, 22(3), 181–187CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Undheim, J. O. (1981b). On intelligence IV: Toward a restoration of general intelligence. Scandinavian Journal of Psychology, 22, 251–265CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Undheim, J. O., & Gustafsson, J.-E. (1987). The hierarchical organization of cognitive abilities: Restoring general intelligence through the use of linear structural relations (LISREL). Multivariate Behavioral Research, 22, 149–171CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Undheim, J. O., & Horn, J. L. (1977). Critical evaluation of Guilford's structure-of-intellect theory. Intelligence, 1, 65–81CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vainikainen, A. (1998). Varusmiesten johtajavalintatutkimus 1995. [Study of leader selection (among conscripts) in 1995]. Finnish Defence Forces, Education Development Centre, Separate Reports, 1/1998. Pieksämäki, Finland: RT-Print OY
Werdelin, I. (1961). Geometrical ability and the space factors in boys and girls. Lund: Gleerups
Werdelin, I., & Stjernberg, G. (1971). The relationship between difficulty and factor loadings of some visual-perceptual tests. Scandinavian Journal of Psychology, 12, 21–28CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Westrin, P. A. (1967). WIT III Manual [Manual of WIT III]. Stockholm, Sweden: Psykologiförlaget
White, K. R. (1982). The relation between socioeconomic status and academic achievement. Psychological Bulletin, 91, 461–481CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Willingham, W. W., & Cole, N. S. (1997). Gender and fair assessment. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure [email protected] is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×