Prosecuting Corporations for International Crimes: The Role for Domestic Criminal Law

doi:10.1017/CBO9780511642265.007

6 - Prosecuting Corporations for International Crimes: The Role for Domestic Criminal Law

Published online by Cambridge University Press: 19 January 2010

Joanna Kyriakakis

Edited by

Larry May and

Zachary Hoskins

Show author details

Larry May: Affiliation:
Vanderbilt University, Tennessee
Zachary Hoskins: Affiliation:
Washington University, St Louis

Book contents

Get access

Summary

The permissive conditions for business-related human rights abuses today are created by a misalignment between economic forces and governance capacity. Only realignment can fix the problem.

In its operations in the Indonesian province of Papua, the U.S. mining company Freeport-McMoRan has been accused of assisting in serious human rights abuses, including torture committed by military and private security forces in Freeport facilities and on Freeport property. In the Sudan, a number of corporations, including the Canadian company Talisman Energy and the Swedish company Lundin Oil AB, have been the targets of campaigns claiming that the companies willfully ignored, or positively assisted in, forcible depopulations occurring in and around their oil mining concession regions. The U.S. company Unocal Corporation settled out of court a lawsuit alleging that it had knowingly used forced labor in its extractive operations in Myanmar. More recently, the Australian company Anvil Mining came under investigation for providing the vehicles that facilitated a military operation by state forces in the Democratic Republic of the Congo, an operation that allegedly involved the commission of a number of war crimes, including rape, arbitrary detentions, and summary executions.

In the context of contemporary global economies, allegations of corporate involvement in breaches of international human rights standards are unfortunately not uncommon. In some cases the nature and extent of wrongful conduct in which corporations are being implicated might be classified as international crimes. International crimes include slavery, crimes against humanity, war crimes, genocide, and torture.

Type: Chapter
Information: International Criminal Law and Philosophy , pp. 108 - 138

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511642265.007 [Opens in a new window]

Publisher: Cambridge University Press

Print publication year: 2009

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Book purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Kyriakakis, Joanna, “Australian Prosecution of Corporations for International Crimes: The Potential of the Commonwealth Criminal Code,” 5(4) Journal of International Criminal Justice (2007), 809, 811–14CrossRef Google Scholar

“Final Report on the Exercise of Universal Jurisdiction in Respect of Gross Human Rights Offences,” 69 International Law Association Reports of Conferences (2000), 403, 406–11

Forcese, Craig, “Deterring ‘Militarized Commerce’: The Prospect of Liability for ‘Privatized’ Human Rights Abuses,” 31 Ottawa Law Review (2000), 171, 174–5Google Scholar

Forcese, Craig, ‘“Militarized Commerce’ in Sudan's Oilfields: Lessons for Canadian Foreign Policy,” 8(3) Canadian Foreign Policy (Spring 2001), 37, 37–41CrossRef Google Scholar

Ratner, Steven R., “Corporations and Human Rights: A Theory of Legal Responsibility,” 111 The Yale Law Journal (2001), 443, 461–73CrossRef Google Scholar

Schutter, Olivier, “The Accountability of Multinationals for Human Rights Violations in European Law,” in Alston, Philip (ed.), Non-State Actors and Human Rights (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2005), 227, 230–40Google Scholar

Joseph, Sarah, “An Overview of the Human Rights Accountability of Multinational Enterprises,” in Kamminga, Menno T. and Zia-Zarifi, Saman (eds.), Liability of Multinational Corporations Under International Law (The Hague: Kluwer Law, 2000), 75, 78–80, and 85–7Google Scholar

Joseph, Sarah, “Taming the Leviathans: Multinational Enterprises and Human Rights,” 46(2) Netherlands International Law Review (1999), 171, 176–81CrossRef Google Scholar

Clough, Jonathan and Mulhern, Carmel, The Prosecution of Corporations (South Melbourne: Oxford University Press, 2002), 65–6Google Scholar

Muchlinski, Peter, Multinational Enterprises and the Law (Oxford: Blackwell, 1999), 12–15Google Scholar

Cryer, Robert et al., An Introduction to International Criminal Law and Procedure (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2007), 3CrossRef Google Scholar

Clapham, Andrew, Human Rights Obligations of Non-State Actors (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2006), 251CrossRef Google Scholar

Clapham, Andrew, “The Question of Jurisdiction Under International Criminal Law Over Legal Persons: Lessons from the Rome Conference on an International Criminal Court,” in Kamminga, Menno T. and Zia-Zarifi, Saman (eds.), Liability of Multinational Corporations Under International Law (The Hague: Kluwer Law, 2000), 139, 143–60Google Scholar

Pellet, Alain, “Entry into Force and Amendment of the Statute” in Cassese, Antonio et al. (eds.), The Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court: A Commentary, Vol. 1 (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2002) 145, 152–3Google Scholar

McCormack, Timothy L. H. and Doherty, Katherine L., “Complementarity as a Catalyst for Comprehensive Domestic Penal Legislation,” 5 University of California, Davis Journal of International Law and Policy (1999), 147, 152Google Scholar

Cassese, Antonio, International Criminal Law (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2003), 352Google Scholar

Newton, Michael A., “Comparative Complementarity: Domestic Jurisdiction Consistent with the Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court,” 167 Military Law Review (2001), 20, 70–2Google Scholar

Broomhall, Bruce, International Justice and the International Criminal Court: Between Sovereignty and the Rule of Law (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2003), 89–91Google Scholar

Kyriakakis, Joanna, “Corporations and the International Criminal Court: The Complementarity Objection Stripped Bare,” 19 Criminal Law Forum (2008), 115, 125–9CrossRef Google Scholar

Bassiouni, M. Cherif, The Legislative History of the International Criminal Court: Introduction, Analysis and Integrated Text, Vol. 1 (Ardsley, Transnational Publishers, 2005), 188Google Scholar

Kleffner, Jann K., “The Impact of Complementarity on National Implementation of Substantive International Criminal Law,” 1 Journal of International Criminal Justice (2003), 86, 88CrossRef Google Scholar

Doelder, Hans and Tiedemann, Klaus (eds.), Criminal Liability of Corporations, XIVth International Congress of Comparative Law (The Hague: Kluwer Law International, 1996)

Eser, Albin, Heine, Gunter, and Huber, Barbara (eds.), Criminal Responsibility of Legal and Collective Entities (Freiburg im Breisgau, Edition luscrim, 1999)

Heine, Gunter, “New Developments in Corporate Criminal Liability in Europe: Can Europeans Learn from the American Experience- or Vice Versa?” St. Louis-Warsaw Transatlantic Law Journal (1998), 173–91Google Scholar

Beale, Sara Sun and Safwat, Adam G., “What Developments in Western Europe Tell Us About American Critiques of Corporate Criminal Liability,” 8 Buffalo Criminal Law Review (2004–2005), 89, 105–36CrossRef Google Scholar

Goode, M.R., “Constructing Criminal Law Reform and the Model Criminal Code,” 26 Criminal Law Journal (2002), 152–66Google Scholar

Stessens, Guy, “Corporate Criminal Liability: A Comparative Perspective,” 43 International and Comparative Law Quarterly (1994), 493, 503CrossRef Google Scholar

Fieberg, Contra Gerhard, “National Developments in Germany: An Overview,” in Eser, Albin, Heine, Gunter, and Huber, Barbara (eds.), Criminal Responsibility of Legal and Collective Entities International Colloquium Berlin, May 4–6, 1998 (Freiburg im Breisgau, Edition luscrim, 1999), 83Google Scholar

Lacey, Nicola, Wells, Celia, and Quick, Oliver, Reconstructing Criminal Law: Text and Materials, 3rd ed. (London: LexisNexis UK, 2003), 624–76Google Scholar

Wells, Celia, Corporations and Criminal Responsibility, 2nd ed. (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2001)CrossRef Google Scholar

May, Larry, The Morality of Groups: Collective Responsibility, Group-Based Harm and Corporate Rights (Notre Dame: University of Notre Dame Press, 1987), 9Google Scholar

Lacey, Nicola, ‘“Philosophical Foundations of the Common Law’: Social Not Metaphysical,” in Horder, Jeremy (ed.), Oxford Essays in Jurisprudence, 4th series (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2000), 17, 25Google Scholar

Wells, Celia and Elias, Juanita, “Catching the Conscience of the King: Corporate Players on the International Stage,” in Alston, P. (ed.), Non-State Actors and Human Rights (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2005), 141, 155Google Scholar

The Trial of Major War Criminals, Proceeding of the International Military Tribunal sitting at Nuremberg, Germany, Vol. 22 (H.M. Stationery Office: London, 1950), 447

Fisse, Brent and Braithwaite, John, Corporations, Crime and Accountability (Melbourne: Cambridge University Press, 1993)Google Scholar

Naffine, Ngaire, “Who Are Law's Persons? From Cheshire Cats to Responsible Subjects,” 66 The Modern Law Review (2003), 346, 350CrossRef Google Scholar

Grear, Anna, “Challenging Corporate ‘Humanity’: Legal Disembodiment, Embodiment and Human Rights,” 7(3) Human Rights Law Review (2007), 519, 524CrossRef Google Scholar

French, Peter, Collective and Corporate Responsibility (New York: Columbia University Press, 1984), 165Google Scholar

Field, Stewart and Jorg, Nico, “Corporate Liability and Manslaughter: Should We Be Going Dutch?” Criminal Law Review (1991), 156, 159Google Scholar

Lynch, Gerald E, “Crime and Custom in Corporate Society: The Role of Criminal Law in Policing Corporate Misconduct,” 60 Law and Contemporary Problems (1997), 23–33CrossRef Google Scholar

Stephens, Beth, “The Amorality of Profit: Transnational Corporations and Human Rights,” 20 Berkeley Journal of International Law (2002), 45, 64Google Scholar

Luban, David, “Beyond Moral Minimalism (Response to Crimes Against Humanity),” 20(3) Ethics & International Affairs (2006), 353, 354–5CrossRef Google Scholar

Fox, James R., Dictionary of International and Comparative Law, 3rd ed. (Dobbs Ferry, NY: Oceana Publications, 2003), 114Google Scholar

Beale, Joseph, “Jurisdiction of a Sovereign State” 36 Harvard Law Review (1923) 241CrossRef Google Scholar

Arendt, Hannah, Eichmann in Jerusalem: A Report on the Banality of Evil (New York: Penguin Group (USA), 2006 edition), 239–44Google Scholar

Clough, Jonathan, “Punishing the Parent: Corporate Criminal Complicity in Human Rights Abuses,” 3 Brooklyn Journal of International Law (2008), 899, 923Google Scholar

May, Larry, Crimes Against Humanity: A Normative Account (New York: Cambridge University Press, 2005)Google Scholar

Mayerfeld, Jamie, “Ending Impunity (Responses to Crimes Against Humanity),” 20(3) Ethics & International Affairs (2006), 361–6CrossRef Google Scholar

Ward, Halina, “Securing Transnational Corporate Accountability through National Courts: Implications and Policy Options,” 24 Hastings International and Comparative Law Review (2001), 451, 459Google Scholar

Cassese, Antonio, “The Statute of the International Criminal Court: Some Preliminary Reflections,” 10 European Journal of International Law (1999), 144–71 at 159CrossRef Google Scholar

Spar, Debora and Yoffie, David, “Multinational Enterprises and the Prospects for Justice,” 52 Journal of International Affairs (1999), 557Google Scholar

Luban, David, “A Theory of Crimes Against Humanity,” 29 Yale Journal of International Law (2004), 86, 120–3Google Scholar

Altman, Andrew, “The Persistent Fiction of Harm to Humanity (Responses to Crimes Against Humanity,” 20(3) Ethics & International Affairs (2006), 367, 372CrossRef Google Scholar

Mattei, Ugo and Lena, Jeffrey, “U.S. Jurisdiction Over Conflicts Arising Outside of the United States: Some Hegemonic Implications,” 24 Hastings International and Comparative Law Review (2001), 381–400Google Scholar

Arbour, Louise, “Will the ICC Have an Impact on Universal Jurisdiction?” 1 Journal of International Criminal Justice (2003), 585CrossRef Google Scholar