Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-g8jcs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-25T21:06:10.044Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

5.2.8 - Cardiac Output Measurement and Interpreting the Derived Data

from Section 5.2 - Practical Cardiovascular System

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 July 2023

Ned Gilbert-Kawai
Affiliation:
The Royal Liverpool Hospital
Debashish Dutta
Affiliation:
Princess Alexandra Hospital NHS Trust, Harlow
Carl Waldmann
Affiliation:
Royal Berkshire Hospital, Reading
Get access

Summary

Key Learning Points

  1. 1. Cardiac output (CO) quantification is used clinically as a surrogate for tissue oxygenation in peri-operative and critical care patient management, and may be used to avoid injudicious fluid administration.

  2. 2. Devices estimate and monitor CO using the Fick principle, Doppler frequency shift and pulse pressure analysis.

  3. 3. Devices differ by invasiveness, provision of other indices and clinical information, required expertise and limitations and potential complications. Pulmonary artery catheters still remain the gold standard, but evidence supports the accuracy of other less invasive devices.

  4. 4. Selection of device is determined by the clinical setting, patient factors and clinician expertise.

  5. 5. Because CO is estimated, rather than measured directly, trends and response to interventions are more clinically meaningful than absolute values.

Type
Chapter
Information
Intensive Care Medicine
The Essential Guide
, pp. 589 - 591
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2021

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

References and Further Reading

Cecconi, M, Dawson, D, Casaretti, R, Grounds, RM, Rhodes, A. A prospective study of the accuracy and precision of continuous cardiac output monitoring devices as compared to intermittent thermodilution. Minerva Anestesiol 2010;76:1010–17.Google ScholarPubMed
Reisner, A. Academic assessment of arterial pulse contour analysis: missing the forest for the trees? Br J Anaesth 2016;116:733–6.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sandham, JD, Hull, RD, Brant, RF, et al. A randomized, controlled trial of the use of pulmonary-artery catheters in high-risk surgical patients. N Engl J Med 2003;348:514.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Vincent, JL, Pelosi, P, Pearse, R, et al. Perioperative cardiovascular monitoring of high-risk patients: a consensus of 12. Crit Care 2015;19:224.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure [email protected] is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×