Book contents
- Institutional Theory
- Institutional Theory
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Figures
- Preface
- Credits
- Part I Introduction
- Part II Institutional Theory: Its Role in Modern Social Analysis
- Part III The Institutional Level of Analysis
- 6 Multiple Levels of Analysis and the Limitations of Methodological Individualisms (2011)
- 7 The Limiting Effects of Analytical Individualism:
- 8 Reflections on Part III:
- Part IV Institutions of Modernity and Postmodernity: The Construction of Actors
- Part V Conclusion
- Index
- References
8 - Reflections on Part III:
Levels of Analysis
from Part III - The Institutional Level of Analysis
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 22 March 2021
Book contents
- Institutional Theory
- Institutional Theory
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Figures
- Preface
- Credits
- Part I Introduction
- Part II Institutional Theory: Its Role in Modern Social Analysis
- Part III The Institutional Level of Analysis
- 6 Multiple Levels of Analysis and the Limitations of Methodological Individualisms (2011)
- 7 The Limiting Effects of Analytical Individualism:
- 8 Reflections on Part III:
- Part IV Institutions of Modernity and Postmodernity: The Construction of Actors
- Part V Conclusion
- Index
- References
Summary
Much social science still fails to employ a now standard philosophical and scientific conceptualization of levels of analysis.In so doing, it still largely avoids the multilevel reasoning appropriate for social science, instead maintaining dogmatic attachments to one or another level of analysis, especially an individual-level one.
Keywords
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- Institutional TheoryThe Cultural Construction of Organizations, States, and Identities, pp. 196 - 206Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2021
References
Barton, A. (1961). Organizational Measurement and Its Bearing on the Study of College Environments, New York, NY: College Entrance Examination Board.Google Scholar
Boltanski, L. & Thévenot, L. (2006). On Justification: Economies of Worth, Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Campbell, A., Converse, P. E., Miller, W., & Stokes, D. (1960). The American Voter, Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Campbell, D. T. (1974). Downward Causation in Hierarchically Organized Biological Systems. In Ayala, F. J. & Dobzhansky, T., eds., Studies in the Philosophy of Biology: Reduction and Related Problems. London: Macmillan, pp. 179–86.Google Scholar
Coleman, J. S. (1986a). Micro Foundations and Macrosocial Theory. In Lindenberg, S., Coleman, J. S., & Nowak, S., eds., Approaches to Social Theory. New York, NY: Russell Sage Foundation, pp. 345–63.Google Scholar
Coleman, J. (1986b). Social Theory, Social Research, and a Theory of Action. American Journal of Sociology, 91(6), 1309–35.Google Scholar
Davis, J. A. (1966). The Campus as a Frog Pond: An Application of the Theory of Relative Deprivation to Career Decisions of College Men. American Journal of Sociology, 72(1), 17–31.Google Scholar
Davis, J., Spaeth, J., & Huson, C. (1961). A Technique for Analyzing the Effects of Group Competition. American Sociological Review, 26(2), 215–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dobbin, F. (2009). Inventing Equal Opportunity, Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Durkheim, E. (1969). Individualism and the Intellectuals. Political Studies, 17(1), 14–30.Google Scholar
Frank, D. J., Camp, B. J., & Boutcher, S. A. (2010). Worldwide Trends in the Criminal Regulation of Sex, 1945 to 2005. American Sociological Review, 75(6), 867–93.Google Scholar
Gray, P. B. & Garcia, J. R. (2013). Evolution and Human Sexual Behavior, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gribbin, J. & Gribbin, M. (1999). Almost Everyone’s Guide to Science, New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Haack, P., Sieweke, J., & Wessel, L., eds. (2019). Microfoundations of Institutions, Bingley: Emerald Publishing.Google Scholar
Hauser, R. (1970). Context and Consex: A Cautionary Tale. American Journal of Sociology, 75(4), 645–64.Google Scholar
Lazarsfeld, P. & Menzel, H. (1961). On the Relation Between Individual and Collective Properties. In Etzioni, A., ed., Complex Organizations. New York, NY: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.Google Scholar
Lerch, J., Bromley, P., Ramirez, F. O., & Meyer, J. W. (2017). The Rise of Individual Agency in Conceptions of Society: Textbooks, Worldwide, 1950–2011. International Sociology, 32(1), 38–60.Google Scholar
Meyer, J. W. & Risse, M. (2018). Creation and Claims of a World Society. In Rangan, S., ed., Capitalism Beyond Mutuality: Perspectives Integrating Philosophy and Social Science. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 25–57.Google Scholar
Nie, N., Junn, J., & Stehlik-Barry, K. (1996). Education and Democratic Citizenship in America, Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Raudenbush, S. & Bryk, A.. (2001). Hierarchical Linear Models, 2nd ed. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.Google Scholar
Robinson, W. S. (1950). Ecological Correlations and the Behavior of Individuals. American Sociological Review, 98(1), 351–7.Google Scholar
Stinchcombe, A. (1985). Macrosociology is About Millions of People. Contemporary Sociology, 14(5), 572–5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thornton, P., Ocasio, W., & Lounsbury, M. (2012). The Institutional Logics Perspective, Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Watkins, J. W. N. (1952). The Principle of Methodological Individualism. British Journal of the Philosophy of Science, 3(10), 186–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar