Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-m6dg7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-06T05:25:04.162Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

12 - Energy Input–Output Analysis

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  06 January 2022

Ronald E. Miller  and
Peter D. Blair
Ronald E. Miller
Affiliation:
University of Pennsylvania
Peter D. Blair
Affiliation:
George Mason University
Get access

Summary

Chapter 12 explores the extension of the input–output framework to more detailed analysis of energy consumption associated with industrial production, including some of the complications that can arise when measuring input–output transactions in physical units of production rather than in monetary terms of the value of production. The chapter reviews early efforts to develop energy input–output analysis and compares them with contemporary approaches and examines the strengths and limitations of the alternatives commonly used today. Special methodological considerations such as adjusting for energy conversion efficiencies are developed along with several illustrative applications, including estimation of the energy costs of goods and services, impacts of new energy technologies, and energy taxes. Energy input–output analysis is increasingly being applied to global scale issues, such as the energy embodied in international trade of goods and services. Finally, the role of structural change of an input–output economy associated with changing patterns of energy use is illustrated, building on the more general approaches developed in Chapter 8.

Keywords

energy input–outputphysical input–output modelsdirect energy requirementstotal energy requirementshybrid unitsenergy conservation conditionsenergy cost of goods and servicescommodity-by-industry energy modelsnet energy analysisenergy and structural change
Type
Chapter
Information
Input-Output Analysis
Foundations and Extensions
 , pp. 547 - 600
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2022

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Albino, Vito, Dietzenbacher, Erik and Kühtz, Silvana. 2003. “Analyzing Materials and Energy Flows in an Industrial District Using an Enterprise Input–Output Model,” Economic Systems Research, 15, 457–480.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Alcántara, Vicent and Padilla, Emilio. 2003. “‘Key’ Sectors in Final Energy Consumption: An Input–Output Application to the Spanish Case,” Energy Policy, 31 , 1673–1678Google Scholar
Almon, Clopper, Buckler, Margaret B., Horowitz, Lawrence M. and Reimbold, Thomas C.. 1974. 1985: Interindustry Forecasts of the American Economy. Lexington, MA: D. C. Heath (Lexington Books).Google Scholar
Altimiras-Martin, Aleix. 2014. “Analyzing the Structure of the Economy Using Physical Input–Output Tables,” Economic Systems Research, 26, 463–485.Google Scholar
Ang, Beng Wah. 1995. “Multilevel Decomposition of Industrial Energy Consumption,” Energy Economics, 17, 39–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ayres, Robert U. and Kneese, Alan. 1969. “Production, Consumption and Externalities,” American Economic Review, 59, 282–297.Google Scholar
Battjes, Jacob, Noorman, Klaas Jan and Biesiot, Wouter. 1998. “Assessing the Energy Intensities of Imports.” Energy Economics, 20, 67–83.Google Scholar
Baumol, William J. and Wolff, Edward N.. 1981. “Subsidies to New Energy Sources: Do They Add to Energy Stocks?” Journal of Political Economy, 89, 891–913.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Becker, Peer E. 1980. “Energy Interdependence in the Economy of the Federal Republic of Germany,” Omega, 8, 29–38.Google Scholar
Berry, Stephen R. 1972. “Recycling, Thermodynamics and Environmental Thrift,” Bulletin of Atomic Scientists, 28, May, 8–15.Google Scholar
Berry, Stephen R., Fels, Margaret and Makino, Hiro. 1974. “A Thermodynamic Valuation of Resource Use: Making Automobiles and Other Processes,” in Macrakis, Michael (ed.), Energy: Demand, Conservation and Institutional Problems. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, pp. 113–127.Google Scholar
Berry, Stephen R., Salmon, Peter and Heal, Geoffrey. 1978. “On a Relation Between Economic and Thermodynamic Optima,” Resources and Energy, 1, 123–137.Google Scholar
Beutel, Jörg. 1983. “Interregional Analysis of Energy Flows,” Papers of the Regional Science Association, 53, 83–104.Google Scholar
Bezdek, Roger and Hannon, Bruce. 1974. “Energy, Manpower and the Highway Trust Fund,” Science, 185 , 669–675.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bezdek, Roger and Wendling, Robert M.. 2005a. “Fuel Efficiency and the Economy,” America Scientist, 93, 132–139.Google Scholar
Bezdek, Roger and Wendling, Robert M.. 2005b. “Potential Long-Term Impacts of Changes in the U.S. Vehicle Fuel Efficiency Standards,” Energy Policy, 33, 407–419.Google Scholar
Bithas, Kostas and Kalimeris, Panos. 2013. “Re-estimating the Decoupling Effect: Is There an Actual Transition towards a Less Energy-Intensive Economy?” Energy, 51, 78–84.Google Scholar
Blair, Peter D. 1979. Multiobjective Regional Energy Planning. Boston, MA: Martinus Nijhoff.Google Scholar
Blair, Peter D. 1980. “Hierarchies and Priorities in Regional Energy Planning,” Regional Science and Urban Economics, 10 , 387–405.Google Scholar
Blair, Peter D. and Wyckoff, Andrew. 1989. “The Changing Structure of the U.S. Economy: An Input–Output Analysis,” in Miller, Ronald E., Polenske, Karen R. and Rose, Adam Z. (eds.), Frontiers of Input–Output Analysis. New York: Oxford University Press, pp. 293–307.Google Scholar
Bourque, Philip. 1981. “Embodied Energy Trade Balances Among Regions,” International Regional Science Review, 6, 121–136.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brinkman, Marnix L. J., da Cunha, Marcelo P., Heijnen, Sanne, Wickea, Birka, Guilhoto, Joaquim J. M., Walter, Arnaldo, Faaij, André P. C. and van der Hilst, Floor. 2018. “Interregional Assessment of Socio-economic Effects of Sugarcane Ethanol Production in Brazil,” Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 88, 347–362.Google Scholar
Bullard, Clark and Herendeen, Robert. 1975a. “Energy Impact of Consumption Decisions,” Proceedings of the IEEE, 63, 484–493.Google Scholar
Bullard, Clark and Herendeen, Robert. 1975b. “The Energy Costs of Goods and Services,” Energy Policy, 1, 268–277.Google Scholar
Bullard, Clark, Penner, Peter and Pilati, David. 1978. “Net Energy Analysis: A Handbook for Combining Process and Input–Output Analysis,” Resources and Energy, 1, 267–313.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carlsson‐Kanyama, Annika, Engström, Rebecka and Kok, Rixt. 2008. “Indirect and Direct Energy Requirements of City Households in Sweden: Options for Reduction, Lessons from Modeling,” Journal of Industrial Ecology, 9, 221–235.Google Scholar
Carter, Anne P. 1970. Structural Change in the American Economy. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Casler, Stephen D. 2001. “Interaction Terms and Structural Decomposition: An Application to the Defense Cost of Oil,” in Lahr, Michael L. and Dietzenbacher, Erik (eds.), Input–Output Analysis: Frontiers and Extensions. New York: Palgrave, pp. 143–160.Google Scholar
Casler, Stephen D., Afrasiabi, Ahmad, and McCauley, Michael. 1991. “Decomposing Change in Energy Input–Output Coefficients,” Resources and Energy, 13, 95–109.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Casler, Stephen D. and Blair, Peter D.. 1997. “Economic Structure, Fuel Combustion, and Pollution Emissions,” Ecological Economics, 22, 19–27.Google Scholar
Casler, Stephen D. and Hannon, Bruce. 1989. “Readjustment Potentials in Industrial Energy Efficiency and Structure,” Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 17, 93–108.Google Scholar
Casler, Stephen D. and Wilbur, Suzanne. 1984. “Energy Input–Output Analysis: A Simple Guide,” Resources and Energy, 6, 1–15.Google Scholar
Chai, Jian, Guo, Ju-E., Wang, Shou-Yang and Lai, Kin Keung. 2009. “Why Does Energy Intensity Fluctuate in China?” Energy Policy, 37, 5717–5731.Google Scholar
Christensen, Laurits R., Jorgenson, Dale W. and Lau, Lawrence J.. 1971. “Conjugate Duality and the Transcendental Logarithmic Utility Function,” Econometrica, 39, 255–256.Google Scholar
Christensen, Laurits R., Jorgenson, Dale W. and Lau, Lawrence J.. 1973. “Transcendental Logarithmic Utility Functions,” Review of Economics and Statistics, 55, 28–45.Google Scholar
Chu, Chia-Yon and Rong-Hwa, Wu. 1994. “Sources of Change in Industrial Electricity Use in the Taiwan Economy, 1976–1986,” Energy Economics, 16, 115–120.Google Scholar
Chung, Whan-Sam, Tohno, Susumu and Shim, Sang Yul. 2009. “An Estimation of Energy and GHG Emission Intensity Caused by Energy Consumption in Korea: An Energy IO Approach,” Applied Energy, 86, 1902–1914.Google Scholar
Cleveland, Cutler J. 1999. “Biophysical Economics: From Physiocracy to Ecological Economics and Industry Ecology,” in Gowdy, John M. and Mayumi, Kozo (eds.), Bioeconomics and Sustainability: Essays in Honor of Nicholas Georgescu-Roegen. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar, pp. 125–154.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Corsatea, Teodora Diana, Lindner, Soeren, Arto, Iñaki, Román, Maria Victoria, Rueda-Cantuche, José Manuel, Afonso, Agustín Velázquez, Amores, Antonio F. and Neuwahl, Frederik. 2019. World Input–Output Database Environmental Accounts: Update 2000–2016. Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union.Google Scholar
Costanza, Robert. 1980. “Embodied Energy and Economic Valuation,” Science, 210, 1219–1224. (Reprinted in I. Sohn (ed.). 1986. Readings in Input–Output Analysis – Theory and Applications. New York: Oxford University Press, pp. 432–444.)Google Scholar
Costanza, Robert and Herendeen, Robert A.. 1984. “Embodied Energy and Economic Value in the United States Economy: 1963, 1967 and 1972,” Resources and Energy, 6, 129–163.Google Scholar
Cumberland, John H. 1966. “A Regional Interindustry Model for Analysis of Development Objectives,” Papers of the Regional Science Association, 17, 65–94.Google Scholar
Dietzenbacher, Erik and Sage, Jesper. 2006. “Mixing Oil and Water? Using Hybrid Input–Output Tables in a Structural Decomposition Analysis,” Economic Systems Research, 18, 85–95.Google Scholar
Duchin, Faye. 1992. “Industrial Input–Output Analysis: Implications for Industrial Ecology,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 89, 851–855.Google Scholar
Duchin, Faye and Hertwich, Edgar. 2003. “Industrial Ecology,” in Internet Encyclopaedia of Ecological Economics. McLean, VA: International Society for Ecological Economics, pp 1–12.Google Scholar
Duchin, Faye and Lange, Glenn-Marie. 1987. “Modeling the Impact of Technological Change,” Mechanical Engineering, 109, 40–44.Google Scholar
Duchin, Faye and Lange, Glenn-Marie. 1994. Ecological Economics, Technological Change and the Future of the Environment. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Feldman, Stanley J., McClain, David, and Palmer, Karen. 1987. “Sources of Structural Change in the United States, 1963–78: An Input–Output Perspective,” Review of Economics and Statistics, 69, 503–510.Google Scholar
Georgescu-Roegen, Nicholas. 1971. The Entropy Law and the Economic Process. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Giljum, Stefan and Hubacek, Klaus. 2004. “Alternative Approaches of Physical Input–Output Analysis to Estimate Primary Material Inputs of Production and Consumption Activities,” Economic Systems Research, 16, 301–310.Google Scholar
Gilliland, Martha W. 1975. “Energy Analysis and Public Policy,” Science, 189, 1051–1056.Google Scholar
Gowdy, John M. and Miller, Jack L.. 1968. “An Input–Output Approach to Energy Efficiency in the USA and Japan (1960–1980),” Energy, 16, 897–902.Google Scholar
Griffin, James. 1976. Energy Input–Output Modeling. Palo Alto, CA: Electric Power Research Institute.Google Scholar
Guevara, Zeus and Rodrigues, João F. D.. 2016. “Structural Transitions and Energy Use: A Decomposition Analysis of Portugal 1995–2010,” Economic Systems Research, 28, 202–223.Google Scholar
Han, Xiaoli and Lakshmanan, T. K.. 1994. “Structural Changes and Energy Consumption in the Japanese Economy 1975–85: An Input–Output Analysis,” The Energy Journal, 15, 165–188.Google Scholar
Hannon, Bruce. 1973. “An Energy Standard of Value,” Annals of the American Academy for Political and Social Sciences, 410, 139–153.Google Scholar
Hannon, Bruce, Blazeck, Thomas, Kennedy, Douglas and Illyes, Robert. 1983. “A Comparison of Energy Intensities: 1963, 1967 and 1972,” Resources and Energy, 5, 83–102.Google Scholar
Hannon, Bruce and Puelo, F.. 1974. “Transferring from Urban Cars to Buses: The Energy and Employment Impacts,” Center for Advanced Computation, Document 98, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign.Google Scholar
Hawdon, David and Pearson, Peter. 1995. “Input–Output Simulations of Energy, Environment, Economy Interactions in the UK,” Energy Economics, 17, 73–86.Google Scholar
Hendrickson, Chris T., Lave, Lester B. and Matthews, H. Scott. 2006. Environmental Life Cycle Assessment of Goods and Services: An Input–Output Approach. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
Henry, Eamon W. 1977. “An Input–Output Approach to Cost–Benefit Analysis of Energy Conservation Methods,” Economic and Social Review, 9, 1–26.Google Scholar
Herendeen, Robert. 1974. “Affluence and Energy Demand,” Mechanical Engineering, 96, 18–22.Google Scholar
Herendeen, Robert. 1978. “Input–Output Techniques and Energy Cost of Commodities,” Energy Policy, 6, 162–165.Google Scholar
Herendeen, Robert and Plant, Randall L.. 1981. “Energy Analysis of Four Geothermal Technologies,” Energy, 6, 73–82.Google Scholar
Hudson, Edward A. and Jorgenson, Dale W.. 1974. “U.S. Energy Policy and Economic Growth, 1975–2000,” Bell Journal of Economics and Management Science, 5, 461–514.Google Scholar
International Atomic Energy Agency. 1994. Net Energy Analysis of Different Electricity Generation Systems, Vienna, Austria, IAEA-TECDOC-753.Google Scholar
Jacobsen, Henrik K. 2000. “Energy Demand, Structural Change and Trade: A Decomposition Analysis of the Danish Manufacturing Industry,” Economic Systems Research, 12, 319–338.Google Scholar
Jain, Sudhakar. 2012. “An Input–Output Analysis to Estimate Embodied Energy of Goods,” International Journal of Scientific and Research Publications, 2, 12 pp.Google Scholar
Jorgenson, Dale W., Slesnick, Daniel T. and Wilcoxen, Peter J.. 1992. “Carbon Taxes and Economic Welfare,” in Baily, Martin N. and Winston, Clifford (eds.), Brookings Papers on Economic Activity: Microeconomics. Washington, DC: The Brookings Institution, pp. 393–454.Google Scholar
Jorgenson, Dale W. and Stiroh, Kevin J.. 2000. “US Economic Growth at the Industry Level,” American Economic Review, Papers and Proceedings of the American Economic Association, 90, 161–167.Google Scholar
Jorgenson, Dale W. and Wilcoxen, Peter J.. 1990. “Environmental Regulation and US Economic Growth,” RAND Journal of Economics, 21, 314–340.Google Scholar
Jorgenson, Dale W. and Wilcoxen, Peter J.. 1993. “Reducing U.S. Carbon Emissions: An Econometric General Equilibrium Assessment,” Resource and Energy Economics, 15, 7–25.Google Scholar
Just, James. 1974. “Impacts of New Energy Technology Using Generalized Input–Output Analysis,” in Macrakis, Michael (ed.), Energy: Demand, Conservation and Institutional Problems. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, pp. 113–127.Google Scholar
Kagawa, Shigemi and Inamura, Hajime. 2001. “A Structural Decomposition of Energy Consumption Based on a Hybrid Rectangular Input–Output Framework: Japan’s Case,” Economic Systems Research, 13, 339–363.Google Scholar
Kagawa, Shigemi and Inamura, Hajime. 2004. “A Spatial Structural Decomposition Analysis of Chinese and Japanese Energy Demand: 1985–1990,” Economic Systems Research, 16, 279–299.Google Scholar
Kelly, Henry C., Blair, Peter D. and Gibbons, John H.. 1989. “Energy Use and Productivity: Current Trends and Policy Implications,” Annual Review of Energy, 14, 321–352.Google Scholar
Kratena, Kurt and Schleicher, Stefan. 1999. “Impact of Carbon Dioxide Emissions Reduction on the Austrian Economy,” Economic Systems Research, 11, 245–261.Google Scholar
Lenzen, Manfred, Pade, Lise-Lotte and Munksgaard, Jesper. 2004. “CO2 Multipliers in Multi-Region Input–Output Models,” Economic Systems Research, 16, 391–412.Google Scholar
Leontief, Wassily. 1936. “Quantitative Input and Output Relations in the Economic System of the United States,” Review of Economics and Statistics, 18, 105–125.Google Scholar
Leontief, Wassily. 1989. “Input–Output and Technological Change,” Economic Systems Research, 1, 287–295.Google Scholar
Liang, Qiao-Mei, Fan, Ying and Wei, Yi-Ming. 2007. “Multi-regional Input–Output Model for Regional Energy Requirements and CO2 Emissions in China,” Energy Policy, 35, 1685–1700.Google Scholar
Liang, Sai, Wang, Can and Zhang, Tianzhu. 2010. “An Improved Input–Output Model for Energy Analysis: A Case Study of Suzhou,” Ecological Economics, 69, 1805–1813.Google Scholar
Liew, Chong K. 1980. “The Impact of Higher Energy Prices on Growth and Inflation in an Industrializing Economy: The Korean Experience,” Journal of Policy Modeling, 2, 389–408.Google Scholar
Lin, Xiannuan and Polenske, Karen. 1995. “Input–Output Anatomy of China’s Energy Use Changes in the 1980s,” Economic Systems Research, 7, 67–84.Google Scholar
Lindner, Sören and Guan, Dabo. 2014. “A Hybrid-Unit Energy Input–Output Model to Evaluate Embodied Energy and Life Cycle Emissions for China’s Economy,” Journal of Industrial Ecology, 18, 201–211.Google Scholar
Liu, Hong Tao, Xi, You Min, Guo, Ju’e and Li, Xia. 2010. “Energy Embodied in the International Trade of China: An Energy Input–Output Analysis,” Energy Policy, 38, 3957–3964.Google Scholar
Logar, Ivana and van den Bergh, Jeroen C. J. M.. 2013. “The Impact of Peak Oil on Tourism in Spain: An Input–Output Analysis of Price, Demand and Economy-Wide Effects,” Energy, 54, 155–166.Google Scholar
Los, Bart. 2017. “Input–Output Analysis of International Trade,” in ten Raa, Thijs (ed.), Handbook of Input–Output Analysis. Northhampton, MA: Edward Elgar Publishing, Inc., chapter 8, pp. 277–328.Google Scholar
Machado, Giovani, Schaeffer, Roberto and Worrell, Ernst. 2001. “Energy and Carbon Embodied in the International Trade of Brazil: An Input–Output Approach,” Ecological Economics, 39, 409–424.Google Scholar
Matthews, H. Scott, Hendrickson, Chris T. and Matthews, Deanna, 2014. Life Cycle Assessment: Quantitative Approaches for Decisions that Matter. Pittsburgh, PA: LCAtextbook.Google Scholar
Mukhopadhyay, Kakali and Chakraborty, Debesh. 1999. “India’s Energy Consumption Changes during 1973/74 to 1991/92,” Economic Systems Research, 11, 423–437.Google Scholar
Nakano, Satoshi, Arai, Sonoe and Washizu, Ayu. 2018. “Development and Application of an Interregional Input–Output Table for Analysis of a Next Generation Energy System,” Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 82, 2834–2842.Google Scholar
Odum, Howard T. 1971. Environment, Power and Society. New York: Wiley-Interscience.Google Scholar
Office of Technology Assessment (OTA). 1988. Technology and the American Economic Transition: Choices for the Future. US Congress, OTA-TET-284, May.Google Scholar
Office of Technology Assessment (OTA). 1990. Energy Use and the US Economy. US Congress, OTA-BP-E-57, June.Google Scholar
Pao, Hsiao-Tien and Hsin-Chia, Fu. 2013. “The Causal Relationship Between Energy Resources and Economic Growth in Brazil,” Energy Policy, 61, 793–801.Google Scholar
Park, Se-Hark. 1982. “An Input–Output Framework for Analyzing Energy Consumption,” Energy Economics, 4, 105–110.Google Scholar
Pick, Hanus Julius and Becker, Peer E.. 1975. “Direct and Indirect Uses of Energy and Materials in Engineering and Construction,” Applied Energy, 1, 31–51.Google Scholar
Polenske, Karen R. 1976. “Multiregional Interactions Between Energy and Transportation,” in Polenske, Karen R. and Skolka, Jiri V. (eds.), Advances in Input–Output Analysis. Proceedings of the Sixth International Conference on Input–Output Techniques. Vienna, April 22–26, 1974. Cambridge, MA: Ballinger, pp. 433–460.Google Scholar
Proops, John L. 1977. “Input–Output Analysis and Energy Intensities: A Comparison of Some Methodologies,” Applied Mathematical Modelling, 1, 181–186.Google Scholar
Proops, John L. 1984. “Modeling the Energy–Output Ratio,” Energy Economics, 6, 47–51.Google Scholar
Proops, John L. 1988. “Energy Intensities, Input–Output Analysis and Economic Development,” in Ciaschini, Maurizio (ed.), Input–Output Analysis – Current Developments. London: Chapman and Hall, pp. 201–215.Google Scholar
Reardon, William A. 1976. An Input–Output Analysis of Energy Use Changes From 1947 to 1958, 1958 to 1963 and 1963 to 1967. Richland, WA: Battelle Pacific Northwest Laboratories.Google Scholar
Rose, Adam Z. and Chen, Chia-Yon. 1991. “Sources of Change in Energy Use in the U.S. Economy 1972–82: A Structural Decomposition Analysis,” Resources and Energy, 13, 1–21.Google Scholar
Roy, Sikhanwita, Das, Tuhin and Chakraborty, Debesh. 2002. “A Study on the Indian Information Sector: An Experiment with Input–Output Techniques,” Economic Systems Research, 14, 107–129.Google Scholar
Spreng, Daniel T. 1988. Net Energy Analysis and the Energy Requirements of Energy Systems. New York: Praeger.Google Scholar
Strout, Alan M. 1967. “Technological Change and U.S. Energy Consumption.” PhD Dissertation, University of Chicago.Google Scholar
Su, Bin and Ang, Beng Wah. 2012a. “Structural Decomposition Analysis Applied to Energy and Emissions: Some Methodological Developments,” Energy Economics, 34, 177–188.Google Scholar
Su, Bin and Ang, Beng Wah. 2012b. “Structural Decomposition Analysis Applied to Energy and Emissions: Aggregation Issues,” Economic Systems Research, 24, 299–317.Google Scholar
Tang, Xu, Zhang, Baosheng, Feng, Lianyong, Snowden, Simon and Höök, Mikael. 2012. “Net Oil Exports Embodied in China’s International Trade: An Input–Output Analysis,” Energy, 48, 464–471.Google Scholar
Treloar, Graham J. 1997. Extracting Embodied Energy Paths from Input–Output Tables: Towards an Input–Output-Based Hybrid Energy Analysis Method,” Economic Systems Research, 9, 375–391.Google Scholar
Voigt, Sebastian, de Cian, Enrica, Schymura, Michael and Verdolini, Elena. 2014. “Energy Intensity Developments in 40 Major Economies: Structural Change or Technology Improvement?” Energy Economics, 41, 47–62.Google Scholar
Wachs, Liz and Singh, Shweta. 2018. “A Modular Bottom-Up Approach for Constructing Physical Input–Output Tables (PIOTs) Based on Process Engineering Models,” Journal of Economic Structure, 7(26), 24 pp.Google Scholar
Wachsmann, Ulrike, Wood, Richard, Lenzen, Manfred and Schaeffer, Roberto. 2009. “Structural Decomposition of Energy Use in Brazil from 1970 to 1996,” Applied Energy, 86, 578–587.Google Scholar
Wang, Hsiao-Fan and Chuang, Hih-Chyi. 1987. “An Input–Output Model for Energy Policy Evaluation,” Energy Systems and Policy, 11, 21–38.Google Scholar
Warr, Benjamin S. and Ayres, Robert U.. 2010. “Evidence of Causality Between the Quantity and Quality of Energy Consumption and Economic Growth,” Energy, 35, 1688–1693.Google Scholar
Weber, Christopher. 2009. “Measuring Structural Change and Energy Use: Decomposition of the US Economy from 1997 to 2002,” Energy Policy, 37, 1561–1570.Google Scholar
Weisz, Helga and Duchin, Faye. 2006. “Physical and Monetary Input–Output Analysis: What Makes the Difference?” Ecological Economics, 57, 534–541.Google Scholar
Wiedmann, Thomas. 2009. “A Review of Recent Multi-Region Input–Output Models Used for Consumption-Based Emission and Resource Accounting,” Ecological Economics, 69, 211–222.Google Scholar
Wier, Matte. 1998. “Sources of Change in Emissions from Energy: A Structural Decomposition Analysis,” Economic Systems Research, 10, 99–111.Google Scholar
Wilting, Harry C., Biesiot, Wouter and Moll, Henri C.. 1999. “Analyzing Potentials for Reducing the Energy Requirement of Households in the Netherlands,” Economic Systems Research, 11, 233–244.Google Scholar
Wolff, Edward N. 1985. “Industrial Composition, Inter-Industry Effects, and the U.S. Productivity Slowdown,” Review of Economics and Statistics, 67, 268–277.Google Scholar
Wu, Rong-Hwa and Chu, Chia-Yon. 1989. “Energy Intensity Analysis for the Period 1971–1984: A Case Study of Taiwan,” Energy, 14, 635–641.Google Scholar
Wu, Rong-Hwa and Chu, Chia-Yon. 1990. “On the Application of Input–Output Analysis to Energy Issues,” Energy Economics, 12, January, 71–76.Google Scholar
Ying, Chen, Pan, Jiahua and Xie, Laihui. 2011. “Energy Embodied in Goods in International Trade of China: Calculation and Policy Implications,” Chinese Journal of Population, Resources and Environment, 9, 16–32.Google Scholar
Zeng, Lin, Xu, Ming, Liang, Sai, Zeng, Siyu and Zhang, Tianzhu. 2014. “Revisiting Drivers of Energy Intensity in China during 1997–2007: A Structural Decomposition Analysis,” Energy Policy, 67, 640–647.Google Scholar
Zhang, Bo, Chen, Zhan Ming, Xia, Xiaohua H., Xu, Xiangyang and Chen, Yanbin. 2013. “The Impact of Domestic Trade on China’s Regional Energy Uses: A Multi-Regional Input–Output Modeling,” Energy Policy, 63, 1169–1181.Google Scholar
Zhang, Lixiao, Hu, Qiuhong and Zhang, Fan. 2014. “Input–Output Modeling for Urban Energy Consumption in Beijing: Dynamics and Comparison,” PLoS One, 9, 1–11.Google Scholar
Zhang, Zhong Xiang and Folmer, Henk. 1998. “Economic Modelling Approaches to Cost Estimates for the Control of Carbon Dioxide Emissions,” Energy Economics, 20, 101–120.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure [email protected] is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×