Adams, P., Fontana, R. and Malerba, F. 2013. The magnitude of innovation by demand in a sectoral system: The role of industrial users in semiconductors. Research Policy 42(1): 1–14.Google Scholar

Bodas Freitas, I., Castellacci, F., Fontana, R., Malerba, F. and Vezzulli, A. 2016. Sectors and the additionality effects of R&D tax credits: A cross-country microeconometric analysis. Research Policy 46(1): 57–72.Google Scholar

Caloghirou, Y., Protogerou, A. and Tsakanikas, A. 2015. Knowledge Intensive Entrepreneurship: Exploring a taxonomy based on the AEGIS survey, in Dynamics of Knowledge-Intensive Entrepreneurship: Business Strategy and Public Policy, ed. Malerba, F., Caloghirou, Y., McKelvey, M. and Radosevic, S.. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar

Castellacci, F. 2007 Technological regimes and sectoral differences in productivity growth. Industrial and Corporate Change 16(6): 1105–1145.Google Scholar

Castellacci, F. 2009 The interactions between national systems and sectoral patterns of innovation. Journal of Evolutionary Economics 19(3): 321–347.Google Scholar

Castellacci, F. (2008): Technological paradigms, regimes and trajectories: Manufacturing and service industries in a new taxonomy of sectoral patterns of innovation. Research Policy 37: 978–994.Google Scholar

Castellacci, F. and Zheng, J. 2010. Technological regimes, Schumpeterian patterns of innovation and firm-level productivity growth. Industrial and Corporate Change 19(6): 1829–1865.Google Scholar

Chandy, R. K. and Tellis, G. J. 2000. The incumbent’s curse? Incumbency, size, and radical product innovation. Journal of Marketing 64: 1–17.Google Scholar

Cohen, W. and Levinthal, D. 1990. Absorptive capacity: A new perspective on learning and innovation. Administrative Science Quarterly March: 128–152.Google Scholar

Cowan, R., David, P., and Foray, D. 2000. The Explicit Economics of Knowledge Codification and Tacitness, Industrial and Corporate Change. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 9(2), 211–253.Google Scholar

Dodgson, M., Mathews, J., Kastelle, T. and Hu, T. 2008. The evolving nature of Taiwan’s national innovation system: The case of biotechnology innovation networks. Research Policy 37(3): 430–445.Google Scholar

Dosi, G. and Nelson, R. 2010. Technological change and industrial dynamics as evolutionary processes, in Handbook of the Economics of Innovation, ed. Hall, B. and Rosenberg, N.. New York: Elsevier, 51–127.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Edquist, C. 2003. The Internet and Mobile Telecommunication System of innovation: Development in Equipment, Access and Content. Cheltenham: Elgar.Google Scholar

Edquist, C. 2004. The fixed internet and mobile telecommunication sectoral system of innovation, in Sectoral Systems of Innovation, ed. Malerba, F.. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Edquist, C., Malerba, F., Metcalfe, S., Montobbio, F. and Steinmueller, E. 2004. Sectoral systems implications for European innovation policy, in Sectoral Systems of Innovation, ed. Malerba, F.. Cambridge: University Press Cambridge.Google Scholar

Fontana, R., Malerba, F. and Marinoni, A. 2015. Mapping sectoral systems of innovation. An empirical analysis of knowledge, in Dynamics of Knowledge Intensive Entrepreneurship, ed. Malerba, F., Caloghirou, Y., McKelvey, M. and Radosevic, S.. Business Strategy and Public Policy, Albington: Routledge.Google Scholar

Garavaglia, C. Malerba, F. Orsenigo, L. Pezzoni, M. 2012. Technological regimes and demand structure in the evolution of the pharmaceutical industry. Journal of Evolutionary Economics 22, 4, 677–709Google Scholar

Giachetti, C. and Marchi, G. 2017. Successive changes in leadership in the worldwide mobile phone industry. Research Policy 46(2): 362–364.Google Scholar

Gu, S., Lundvall, B.-Å., Liu, J., Malerba, F., and Schwaag Serger, S. 2009. China’s system and vision of innovation: An analysis in relation to the strategic adjustment and the medium- to long-term S&T development plan (2006–20). Industry & Innovation 16: 369–388.Google Scholar

Guennif, S. and Ramani, S. V. 2012. Explaining divergence in catching-up in pharma between India and Brazil using the NSI framework. Research Policy 41: 430–441.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Jacobides, M. 2008. How capabilities differences, transaction costs and learning curves interact to shape vertical scope. Organization Science 19(2): 306–326.Google Scholar

Jacobides, M. and Winter, S. 2005. The co-evolution of capabilities and transaction costs: Explaining the institutional structure of production. Strategic Management Journal 26(5): 395–413.Google Scholar

Kang, H. and Song, J. 2017. Innovation and recurring shifts in industrial leadership: Three phases of change and persistence in the camera industry. Research Policy 46(2): 376–387.Google Scholar

Landini, F. and Malerba, F. 2016. Public Policy, Catching Up in Global Industries and Technological Change: A Simulation Model. Milan: Bocconi University.Google Scholar

Lee, K. 2005. Making a technological catch-up: Barriers and opportunities. Asian Journal of Technology Innovation 13(2): 97–131.Google Scholar

Lee, K. 2013. Schumpeterian Analysis of Economic Catch-Up: Knowledge, Path Creation and the Middle Income Trap. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Lee, K. and Ki, J., 2017. Rise of latecomers and catch-up cycles in the world steel industry. Research Policy 46(2): 365–375.Google Scholar

Lee, K. and Lim, C., 2001. Technological regimes, catching-up and leapfrogging: Findings from the Korean industries. Research Policy 30: 459–483.Google Scholar

Lee, K. and Malerba, F. 2017. Catch-up cycles and changes in industrial leadership: Windows of opportunity and responses of firms and countries in the evolution of sectoral systems. Research Policy 46(2): 338–351.Google Scholar

Lee, K., Mani, S. and Mu, Q. 2012. Explaining divergent stories of catch-up in the telecommunication equipment industry in Brazil, China, India, and Korea, in Economic Development as a Learning Process: Variation across Sectoral Systems, ed. Malerba, F. and Nelson, R.. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 21–71.Google Scholar

Lee, K., Lim, C. and Song, W. 2015. Emerging digital technology as a window of opportunity and technological leapfrogging: catch-up in digital TV by the Korean firms. International Journal of Technology Management 29(1–2): 40–63.Google Scholar

Lenzi, C., Bishop, K., Breschi, S., Buenstorf, G., Llerena, P., Mancusi, M. L. and McKelvey, M. 2010. New innovators and knowledge intensive entrepreneurship in European sectoral systems: A field analysis, in Knowledge Intensive Entrepreneurship and Innovation Systems, ed. Malerba, F.. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar

Malerba, F. 2002. Sectoral systems of innovation and production. Research Policy 31: 247–264.Google Scholar

Malerba, F. (ed.). 2004. Sectoral Systems of Innovation: Evidence from Europe. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Malerba, F. 2005. Sectoral systems, in Oxford Handbook of Innovation, ed. Fagerberg, J., Mowery, D. and Nelson, R.. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Malerba, F. and Adams, P. 2013. Sectoral systems of innovation, in Oxford Handbook of Innovation Management, ed. Dodgson, M., Gann, D. and Phillips, N.. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 183–203.Google Scholar

Malerba, F. and Mani, S. 2009. Sectoral Systems of Innovation and Production in Developing Countries: Actors, Structure and Evolution. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing Incorporated.Google Scholar

Malerba, F. and Nelson, R. R. 2011. Learning and catching up in different sectoral systems: Evidence from six industries. Industrial and Corporate Change 20(6): 1645–1675.Google Scholar

Malerba, F. and Nelson, R. R. 2012. Economic Development as a Learning Process: Variation across Sectoral Systems. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing Incorporated.Google Scholar

Malerba, F. and Orsenigo, L. 1997. Technological regimes and sectoral patterns of innovative activities. Industrial and Corporate Change 6(1): 86–118.Google Scholar

Malerba, F., Nelson, R., Orsenigo, L. and Winter, S. 2001. Competition and industrial policies in a ‘history friendly’ model of the evolution of the computer industry. International Journal of Industrial Organization 19(5): 635–664.Google Scholar

Malerba, F., Nelson, R., Orsenigo, L. and Winter, S. 2007. Demand innovation and the dynamics of market structure: The role of experimental users and diverse preferences. Journal of Evolutionary Economics 17(4): 371–399.Google Scholar

Malerba, F., Nelson, R., Orsenigo, L. and Winter, S. 2008. Public policies and changing boundaries of firms in a ‘history-friendly’ model of the coevolution of the computer and semiconductor industry. Journal of Economic Behaviour and Organization 67(2): 355–380.Google Scholar

Malerba, F., Nelson, R. R., Orsenigo, L. and Winter, S. 2016. Innovation and the Evolution of Industries. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Mathews, J. A. 2002. Competitive advantages of the latecomer firm: A resource-based account of industrial catch-up strategies. Asia Pacific Journal of Management 19: 467–488.Google Scholar

Mathews, J. A. 2005. Strategy and the Crystal Cycle. California Management Review 47: 6–31.Google Scholar

McKelvey, M., Orsenigo, L. and Pammolli, F. 2004. Pharmaceutical industry analysed through the lens of a sectoral system of innovation, in Sectoral Systems of Innovation, ed. Malerba, F.. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Metcalfe, J. S. 1995. Technology systems and technology policy in an evolutionary framework. Cambridge Journal of Economics 19(1): 25–46.Google Scholar

Metcalfe, J. S. 2002. Introduction to the special issue: Change, transformation and development. Journal of Evolutionary Economics 12(1): 1.Google Scholar

Morrison, A. and Rabellotti, R. 2017. Gradual catch up and enduring leadership in the global wine industry. Research Policy 46(2): 417–430.Google Scholar

Mowery, D. C. and Nelson, R. R. 1999. Sources of Industrial Leadership: Studies of Seven Industries. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Murmann, J. P. 2003. Knowledge and Competitive Advantage: The Coevolution of Firms, Technology, and National Institutions. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Murmann, J. P. 2013. The coevolution of industries and important features of their environments. Organization Science (1): 58–78.Google Scholar

Murmann, J. P. and Brenner, T. 2003. The use of simulations in developing robust knowledge about causal processes: Methodological considerations and an application to industrial evolution, papers on economics and evolution #0303. Jena: Max-Planck-Institute of Economics.Google Scholar

Nelson, R. and Winter, S. 1982. An Evolutionary Theory of Economic Change. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar

Nelson, R. R. 1994. The coevolution of technology, industrial structure and supporting institutions. Industrial and Corporate Change 3(1): 47–63.Google Scholar

Pavitt, K. 1984. Sectoral patterns of technical change: Towards a taxonomy and a theory. Research Policy 13: 343–375.Google Scholar

Peneder, M. 2010. Technological regimes and the variety of innovation behaviour: Creating integrated taxonomies of firms and sectors. Research Policy 39(3): 323–334.Google Scholar

Perez, C. and Soete, L. 1988. Catching-up in technology: Entry barriers and windows of opportunity, in Technical Change and Economic Theory, ed. Dosi, G., Freeman, C., Nelson, R., Silverberg, G. and Soete, L.. London: Pinter Publishers, 458–479.Google Scholar

Shin, J.-S. 2017. Dynamic catch-up strategy, capability expansion and changing windows of opportunity in the memory industry. Research Policy 46(2): 404–416.Google Scholar

Vertesy, D. 2017. Changing leadership in the regional jet industry. Research Policy 46(2): 388–403.Google Scholar

Winter, S. 1987. Knowledge and competence as strategic assets, in The Competitive Challenge – Strategies for Industrial Innovation and Renewal, ed. Teece, D.. Cambridge, MA: Ballinger (Harper and Row).Google Scholar

Yu, J., Malerba, F., Adams, P. and Zhang, Y. 2016. Diverging Sectoral Systems in China: Telecommunications Equipment and Semiconductors. Industry and Innovation Forthcoming.Google Scholar

Aghion, P. and Howitt, P.. 1998. Endogenous Growth Theory. Cambridge: MIT Press.Google Scholar

Agrawal, A., Rosell, C. and Simcoe, T. S.. 2014. Do tax credits affect R&D expenditures by small firms? Evidence from Canada, NBER Working Paper 20615.Google Scholar

Almus, M. and Czarnitzki, D.. 2003. The effects of public R&D subsidies on firms’ innovation activities: The case of Eastern Germany. Journal of Business and Economic Statistics 21(2): 226–236.Google Scholar

Arqué-Castells, P. and Mohnen, P.. 2015. Sunk costs, extensive R&D subsidies and permanent inducement effects. Journal of Industrial Economics 63(3): 458–494.Google Scholar

Baghana, R. and Mohnen, P.. 2009. Effectiveness of R&D tax incentives in small and large enterprises in Québec. Small Business Economics 33(1): 91–107.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Barro, R. J. and Sala-i-Martin, X.. 2004. Economic Growth (2nd edition). Cambridge: Massachusetts Institute of Technology Press.Google Scholar

Becker, B. 2015. Public R&D policies and private R&D investment: A survey of the empirical evidence. Journal of Economic Surveys 29(5): 917–942.Google Scholar

Bernstein, J. 1986. The effect of direct and indirect tax incentive on Canadian industrial R&D expenditures. Canadian Public Policy 12(3): 438–448.Google Scholar

Bérubé, C. and Mohnen, P.. 2009. Are firms that receive R&D subsidies more innovative? Canadian Journal of Economics 42(1): 206–225.Google Scholar

Bloom, N., Griffith, R. and Van Reenen, J. 2002. Do R&D credits work? Evidence from a panel of countries 1979–97. Journal of Public Economics 85: 1–31.Google Scholar

Bloom, N., Schankerman, M. and Van Reenen, J.. 2013. Identifying technology spillovers and market rivalry. Econometrica 81(4): 1347–1393.Google Scholar

Bronzini, R. and Iachini, E.. 2014. Are incentives for R&D effective? Evidence from a regression discontinuity approach. American Economic Journal: Economic Policy 6(4): 100–134.Google Scholar

Busom, I., Corchuelo, B. and Martínez Ros, E.. 2014. Tax incentives or subsidies for business R&D? Small Business Economics 43(3): 571–596.Google Scholar

Caiumi, A. 2011. The evaluation of the effectiveness of tax expenditures- A novel approach: An application to the regional tax incentives for business investments in Italy, OECD Taxation Working Papers 5, OECD.Google Scholar

Cantner, U. and Vannuccini, S.. 2016. Elements of Schumpeterian catalytic research and innovation policy, presented at the International Schumpeter Society conference in Montreal.Google Scholar

Cappelen, A., Raknerud, A. and Rybalka, M.. 2012. The effects of R&D tax credits on patenting and innovations. Research Policy 41: 334–345.Google Scholar

Carboni, O. A. 2011. R&D subsidies and private R&D expenditures: Evidence from Italian manufacturing data. International Review of Applied Economics 25: 419–439.Google Scholar

Castellacci, F. and Lie, C.. 2015. Do the effects of R&D tax credits vary across industries? A meta-regression analysis. Research Policy 44(4): 819–832.Google Scholar

Corchuelo, M. B. 2006. Incentivos fiscales en I+D y decisiones de innovacíon. Revista de Economía Aplicada. XIV(40): 5–34.Google Scholar

Corchuelo Martínez-Azúa, B. and Martínez-Ros, E.. 2008. Aplicación de los incentivos fiscales a la inversión I+D en las impresas españolas. Hacienda Pública Española/ Revista de Economía Pública 187(4): 9–39.Google Scholar

Corrado, C., Haskel, J., Jona-Lasinio, C. and Nasim, B.. 2015. Is international R&D tax competition a zero-sum game? Evidence from the EU, paper presented at the NBER/CRIW workshop, Cambridge.Google Scholar

Crépon, B., Duguet, E. and Mairesse, J.. 1998. Research, innovation and productivity: An econometric analysis at the firm level. Economics of Innovation and New Technology 7(2): 115–158.Google Scholar

Cunningham, P., Gök, A. and Larédo, P.. 2016. The impact of direct support to R&D and innovation in firms, in Handbook of Innovation Policy Impact, ed. Edler, J., Cunningham, P., Gök, A. and Shapira, P.. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.Google Scholar

Czarnitzki, D., Ebersberger, B. and Fier, A.. 2007. The relationship between R&D collaboration, subsidies and R&D performance: Empirical evidence from Finland and Germany. Journal of Applied Econometrics 22: 1347–1366.Google Scholar

Czarnitzki, D., Hanel, P. and Rosa, J.. 2011. Evaluating the impact of R&D tax credit on innovation: A microeconometric study on Canadian firms. Research Policy 40: 217–229.Google Scholar

Czarnitzki, D. and Licht, G.. 2006. Additionality of public R&D grants in a transition economy. Economics of Transition 14(1): 101–131.Google Scholar

Dagenais, M., Mohnen, P. and Therrien, P.. 2004. Les firmes canadiennes répondent-elles aux incitations fiscales à la recherche-développement? Actualité Économique 80(2/3): 175–206.Google Scholar

Dahlby, B. 2005. A framework for evaluating provincial R&D tax subsidies. Canadian Public Policy 31(1): 45–58.Google Scholar

David, P. A., Hall, B. H. and Toole, A. A.. 2000. Is public R&D a complement for private R&D? A review of the econometric literature. Research Policy 29: 497–529.Google Scholar

Dechezleprêtre, A., Einiö, E, Martin, R., Nguyen, K. T and Van Reenen, J.. 2015. Do tax incentives for research increase firm innovation? An RDD for R&D, mimeo.Google Scholar

de Jong, J. and Verhoeven, W. 2007. WBSO evaluation 2001–2005: Impacts, target group reach and implementation, Research Series, Ministry of Economic Affairs, The Hague. Netherlands.Google Scholar

Duguet, E. 2012. The effect of the incremental R&D tax credit on the private funding of R&D an econometric evaluation on French firm level data. Revue d’Economie Politique 122(3): 405–435.Google Scholar

Dumont, M. 2013. The impact of subsidies and fiscal incentives on corporate R&D expenditures in Belgium (2001–2009). Reflets et Perspectives de la Vie Economique 1: 69–91.Google Scholar

Einiö, E. 2014. R&D subsidies and company performance: Evidence from geographic variation in government funding based on the ERDF population density rule. Review of Economics and Statistics 96(4): 710–728.Google Scholar

European Commission. 2014. A study on R&D tax incentives: Final report, DG TAXUD Taxation Paper 52.Google Scholar

Fagerberg, J. 2016. Innovation policy: Rationales, lessons and challenges. Journal of Economic Surveys, forthcoming.Google Scholar

Falk, R. 2007. Measuring the effects of public support schemes on firms’ innovation activities: Survey evidence from Austria. Research Policy 36(5): 665–679.Google Scholar

Garcia-Quevedo, J. 2004. Do public subsidies complement business R&D? A meta-analysis of the econometric evidence. Kyklos 57(1): 87–102.Google Scholar

Gonzáles, X., Jaumandreu, J. and Pazó, C.. 2005 Barriers to innovation and subsidy effectiveness. Rand Journal of Economics 36(4): 930–950.Google Scholar

Goolsbee, A. 1998. Does government R&D policy mainly benefit scientists and engineers? American Economic Review 88(2): 298–302.Google Scholar

Griliches, Z. 1992. The search for R&D spillovers. The Scandinavian Journal of Economics 94: 29–47.Google Scholar

Grossman, Gene M. and Helpman, Elhanan. 1991. Innovation and Growth in the Global Economy. Cambridge: MIT Press.Google Scholar

Guceri, I. and Liu, L.. 2017. Effectiveness of fiscal incentives for R&D: Quasi-experimental evidence, IMF working paper WP/17/84.Google Scholar

Guerzoni, M. and Raiteri, E.. 2015. Demand-side vs. supply-side technology policies: Hidden treatment and new empirical evidence on the policy mix. Research Policy 44(3): 726–747.Google Scholar

Hægeland, T. and Moen, J.. 2007. Input additionality in the Norwegian R&D tax credit scheme, reports 2007/47, Statistics Norway 2007.Google Scholar

Hall, B. and Van Reenen, J.. 2000. How effective are fiscal incentives for R&D? A review of the evidence. Research Policy 29: 449–469.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hall, B., Mairesse, J. and Mohnen, P.. 2010. Measuring the returns to R&D, in Handbook of the Economics of Innovation, ed. Hall, B. H. and Rosenberg, N., 1034–1082. Amsterdam: Elsevier.Google Scholar

Harris, R., Li, Q. C. and Trainor, M.. 2009. Is a higher rate of R&D tax credit a panacea for low levels of R&D in disadvantaged regions. Research Policy 38: 192–305.Google Scholar

Hines, James R. Jr. 1995. Taxes, technology transfer, and the R&D activities of multinational firms in The Effects of Taxation on Multinational Corporations, 225–252. National Bureau of Economic Research.Google Scholar

Hollander, A., Haurie, A. and L’Ecuyer, P.. 1987. Ratched effects and the cost of incremental incentive schemes. Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control 11: 373–387.Google Scholar

Hottenrott, H., Lopes-Bento, C. and Veugelers, R.. 2006. Direct and cross scheme effects in a research and development subsidy program, mimeo.Google Scholar

Hussinger, K. 2008. R&D and subsidies at the firm level: An application of parametric and semi-parametric two-step selection models. Journal of Applied Econometrics 23: 729–747.Google Scholar

Ientile, Damien and Mairesse, Jacques. 2009. A policy to boost the R&D: Does the tax credit work? European Investment Bank Paper 14(1): 144–168.Google Scholar

Kasahara, H., Shimotsu, K. and Suzuki, M.. 2013. Does an R&D tax credit affect R&D expenditure? The Japanese R&D tax credit reform in 2003, CESifo working paper 4451.Google Scholar

Labeaga, J. M., Martínez-Ros, E. and Mohnen, P.. 2014. The influence of tax incentives, subsidies and other public incentives to stimulate private R&D in Spain, UNU-MERIT working 2014–081.Google Scholar

Larédo, P., Köhler, C. and Rammer, C.. 2016. The impact and effectiveness of fiscal incentives for R&D, in Handbook of Innovation Policy Impact, ed. Edler, J., Cunningham, P., Gök, A. and Shapira, P.. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.Google Scholar

Lemaire, I. 1996. Optimal firm response to incremental tax credits, Cahier de recherche du CREST no. 9657.Google Scholar

Lhuillery, S., Marino, M. and Parrotta, P.. 2013. Evaluation de l’impact des aides directes et indirectes à la R&D en France, Rapport pour le Ministère de l’enseignement supérieur et de la recherche.Google Scholar

Lokshin, B. and Mohnen, P.. 2013. Do R&D tax incentives lead to higher wages for R&D workers? Evidence from the Netherlands. Research Policy 42(3): 823–830.Google Scholar

Lokshin, B. and Mohnen, P.. 2012. How effective are level-based R&D tax credits? Evidence from the Netherlands. Applied Economics 44(12): 1527–1538.Google Scholar

Mairesse, J. and Mulkay, B.. 2004. Une évaluation du crédit d’impôt recherche en France, 1980–1997. Revue d’Economie Politique 114(6): 747–778.Google Scholar

Marey, P. and Borghans, L.. 2000. Wage Elasticities of the Supply of R&D Workers in the Netherlands, mimeo, ROA. University of Maastricht.Google Scholar

Mazzucato, M. 2013. The Entrepreneurial State. London: Anthem Press.Google Scholar

McFetridge, D. G. and Warda, J. P.. 1983. Canadian R&D incentives: Their adequacy and impact. Canadian Tax Paper No. 70, Canadian Tax Foundation, Toronto.Google Scholar

Mohnen, P. 1996. R&D externalities and productivity growth. STI Review OECD 18: 39–66.Google Scholar

Mohnen, P. and Lokshin, B.. 2010. What does it take for an R&D tax incentive policy to be effective? in Reforming Rules and Regulations: Laws, Institutions and Implementation, ed. Ghosal, V., 33–58. Boston, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar

Mohnen, P. and Hall, B.. 2013. Innovation and productivity: An update. Eurasian Business Review 3(1): 47–65.Google Scholar

Mohnen, P., Vankan, A. and Verspagen, B.. 2017. Evaluating the innovation box tax policy instrument in the Netherlands, 2007–2013. Oxford Review of Economic Policy 33(1): 141–156.Google Scholar

Mowery, D. and Rosenberg, N.. 1998. Paths of Innovation. Technological Change in 20th-Century America. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Mulkay, B. and Mairesse, J.. 2013. The R&D tax credit in France: assessment and ex-ante evaluation of the 2008 reform, NBER working paper 19073.Google Scholar

Neicu, D. 2016. Mix and match: Evaluating the additionality of an R&D policy mix, chapter II of PhD dissertation, KU Leuven.Google Scholar

Neicu, D., Teirlinck, P. and Klechtermans, S.. 2016. Dipping in the policy mix: Do R&D subsidies foster behavioral additionality effects of R&D tax credits? Economics of Innovation and New Technology 25(3): 218–239.Google Scholar

Özçelik, E. and Taymaz, E.. 2008. R&D support programmes in developing countries: The Turkish experience. Research Policy 37: 258–275.Google Scholar

Parsons, Mark and Phillips, Nicolas. 2007. An evaluation of the Federal tax credit for scientific research and experimental development, Department of Finance, working paper 2007–08.Google Scholar

Sveikauskas, L. 2007. R&D and Productivity Growth: A Review of the Literature. U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, Office of Productivity and Technology, working paper 408.Google Scholar

Takalo, T., Tanayama, T. and Toivanen, O.. 2013. Estimating the benefits of targeted R&D subsidies. Review of Economics and Statistics 95(1): 255–272.Google Scholar

Thomson, R. 2013. Measures of R&D tax incentives for OECD countries. Review of Economics and Institutions 4(3): article 4. Also as Melbourne Institute, Working Paper No. 17/12.Google Scholar

Ugur, M., Trushin, E., Solomon, E. and Guidi, F.. 2016. R&D and productivity in OECD firms and industries: A hierarchical meta-regression analysis. Research Policy 45: 269–286.Google Scholar

Wilson, D. 2005. Beggar thy neighbor? The in-state vs. out-of-state impact of state R&D tax credits, Federal Reserve Bank of San Fransisco, working paper 2005–08.Google Scholar

Yohei, K. O. B. A. 2011. Effect of R&D tax credits for small and medium-sized enterprises in Japan: evidence from firm-level data, RIETI Discussion Paper 11-E-066.Google Scholar

Zuñiga-Vicente, J. A., Alonso-Borrego, C., Forcadell, F. J. and Galán, J. I.. 2014. Assessing the effect of public subsidies on firm R&D investment: A survey. Journal of Economic Surveys 28: 36–67.Google Scholar

Abbate, J. 1999. Inventing the Internet. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar

Abraham, J. 2010. Pharmaceuticalization of society in context: Theoretical, empirical and health dimensions. Sociology 44(4): 603–622.Google Scholar

Amsden, A. H. 2001. The Rise of “the Rest”: Challenges to the West from Late-Industrializing Economies. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Angell, M. 2005. The truth about the drug companies: How they deceive us and what to do about it. New York: Random House.Google Scholar

Arrow, K. 1951. An Extension of the Basic Theorems of Classical Welfare Economics. Chapter presented at the Second Berkeley Symposium on Mathematical Statistics and Probability, Berkeley, CA.Google Scholar

Block, F. L. 2008. Swimming against the current: The rise of a hidden developmental state in the United States. Politics and Society 36(2, June): 169–206.Google Scholar

Block, F. L. and Keller, M. R.. 2011. State of Innovation: The U.S. Government’s Role in Technology Development. Boulder, CO: Paradigm Publishers.Google Scholar

Brown, R. 2016. “Mission impossible? Entrepreneurial universities in peripheral regional innovative systems.” Industry and Innovation 23(2).Google Scholar

Buchanan, J. M. 2003. Public choice: The origins and development of a research program. Champions of Freedom 31: 13–32.Google Scholar

Chataway, J., Brusoni, S., Cacciatori, E., Hanlin, R., and Orsenigo, L.. 2007. The international AIDS vaccine initiative (IAVI) in a changing landscape of vaccine development: A public/private partnership as knowledge broker and integrator. The European Journal of Development Research 19(1): 100–117.Google Scholar

Cohen, W. M. and Levinthal, D. A.. 1990. Absorptive capacity: A new perspective on learning and innovation. Administrative Science Quarterly 35(1): 128–152.Google Scholar

Crouch, C. 2016. The paradoxes of privatization and public-service outsourcing, in Rethinking Capitalism, ed. Jacobs, M. and Mazzucato, M.. Wiley Press.Google Scholar

Dosi, G. 1982. Technological paradigms and technological trajectories: A suggested interpretation of the determinants and directions of technical change. Research Policy 11(3): 147–162.Google Scholar

Dosi, G. and Lovallo, D. 1998. Rational entrepreneurs or optimistic martyrs? Some considerations on technological regimes, corporate entries, and the evolutionary role of decision biases, in Foresights and Oversights in Technological Change, ed. Garud, R., Nayyar, P., and Shapiro, Z., 41–68. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Dosi, G. and Nelson, R. R.. 1994. An introduction to evolutionary theories in economics. Journal of Evolutionary Economics 4(3): 153–172.Google Scholar

Engel, D., Rothgang, M., and Eckl, V.. 2016. Systemic aspects of R&D policy subsidies for R&D collaborations and their effects on private R&D. Industry and Innovation 23(2).Google Scholar

Evans, P. 1995. Embedded Autonomy: States and Industrial Transformation (First edition). Princeton, N.J: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar

Flanagan, K. and Uyarra, E.. 2016. Four dangers in innovation policy studies – and how to avoid them. Industry and Innovation 23(2).Google Scholar

Foray, D., David, P. A., and Hall, B.. 2009. Smart specialization: The concept, in Knowledge for Growth. Prospects for Science, Technology and Innovation. Selected chapters from Research Commissioner Janez Potočnik’s Expert Group, 20.Google Scholar

Foray, D., Mowery, D., and Nelson, R. R.. 2012. Public R&D and social challenges: What lessons from mission R&D programs? Research Policy 41(10): 1697–1902.Google Scholar

Freeman, C. 1995. The “National System of Innovation” in historical perspective. Cambridge Journal of Economics 19(1): 5–24.Google Scholar

Freeman, C. and Soete, L.. 1997 [1974]. The Economics of Industrial Innovation (3rd edn.). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar

Hirschman, A. O. 1967. Development Projects Observed. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press.Google Scholar

Kakabadse, A. and Kakabadse, N.. 2002. Trends in outsourcing: Contrasting USA and Europe. European Management Journal 20(2): 189–198.Google Scholar

Keller, M. R. and Block, F.. 2013. Explaining the transformation in the US innovation system: the impact of a small government program. Socio-Economic Review 11(4): 629–656.Google Scholar

Lazonick, W. and Tulum, O.. 2011. US biopharmaceutical finance and the sustainability of the biotech business model. Research Policy 40(9): 1170–1187.Google Scholar

Lundvall, B. A. 1992. National Innovation System: Towards a Theory of Innovation and Interactive Learning. Pinter: London.Google Scholar

Martin, B. R. 2016. R&D policy instruments – a critical review of what we do and don’t know. Industry and Innovation 23(2).Google Scholar

Mazzucato, M. 2013a. The Entrepreneurial State: Debunking the Public vs. Private Myth in Risk and Innovation. London: Anthem Press.Google Scholar

Mazzucato, M. 2013b. Financing innovation: Creative destruction vs. destructive creation. Industrial and Corporate Change 22(4): 851–867.Google Scholar

Mazzucato, M. 2013c. Debunking the market mechanism: a response to John Kay. Political Quarterly 84(4): 444–447.Google Scholar

Mazzucato, M. and Perez, C. 2015a. “Innovation as growth policy,” in The Triple Challenge: Europe in a New Age. Fagerberg, J., Laestadius, S., and Martin, B. (eds.), Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Mazzucato, M. 2015b. Innovation systems: From fixing market failures to creating markets. Intereconomics 50(3): 120–125.Google Scholar

Mazzucato, M. 2016a. From market fixing to market-creating: A new framework for innovation policy. Special Issue of Industry and Innovation: “Innovation policy – can it make a difference?” 23(2).Google Scholar

Mazzucato, M. 2016b. Innovation, the state and patient capital, in Rethinking Capitalism Economics and Policy for Sustainable and Inclusive Growth, chapter 6, ed. Jacobs, M. and Mazzucato, M.. London: Wiley-Blackwell.Google Scholar

Mazzucato, M. and Penna, C. C. R.. 2014. Beyond market failures: State investment banks and the “mission-oriented” finance for innovation. SPRU Working paper Series 21.Google Scholar

Mazzucato, M. and Perez, C.. 2014. Innovation as growth policy. SPRU Working Paper Series 13.Google Scholar

Mazzucato, M. and Wray, R.. 2015. Financing the capital development of the economy: A Keynes-Schumpeter-Minsky synthesis.” Levy Institute Working Paper No. 837.Google Scholar

Mazzucato, M. 2018. Mission oriented research and innovation in the EU: A problem solving approach to fuel innovation-led growth, ISBN 978-92-79-79918-1 https://publications.europa.eu/en/publication-detail/-/publication/5b2811d1-16be-11e8-9253-01aa75ed71a1/language-en (accessed 1/4/2018)Google Scholar

Motoyama, Y., Appelbaum, R., and Parker, R.. 2011. The national nanotechnology initiative: Federal support for science and technology, or hidden industrial policy? Technology in Society 33(1–2): 109–118.Google Scholar

Mowery, D. C., Nelson, R. R., and Martin, B. R.. 2010. Technology policy and global warming: Why new policy models are needed (or why putting new wine in old bottles won’t work). Research Policy 39(8): 1011–1023.Google Scholar

Nelson, R. R. and Winter, S. G.. 1982. An Evolutionary Theory of Economic Change. Cambridge, MA: Belknap Press.Google Scholar

O’Riain, S. 2004. The Politics of High Tech Growth: Developmental Network States in the Global Economy. Boston, MA: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Perez, C. 2002. Technological Revolutions and Financial Capital: The Dynamics of Bubbles and Golden Ages. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Polanyi, K. 2001 [1944]. The Great Transformation: The Political and Economic Origins of Our Time (2nd Chapterback, Beacon edn.). Boston, MA: Beacon Press.Google Scholar

Reinert, E. S. 2007. How Rich Countries Got Rich and Why Poor Countries Stay Poor. London: Constable.Google Scholar

Rodrik, D. 2004. Industrial policy for the twenty-first century. John F. Kennedy School of Government Working Paper Series rwp04–047.Google Scholar

Rodrik, D. 2013. Green industrial policy. Princeton University Working Paper.Google Scholar

Rodrik, D. 2015. From welfare state to innovation state, Project Syndicate www.project-syndicate.org/commentary/labor-saving-technology-by-dani-rodrik-2015–01 (accessed March 3, 2015).Google Scholar

Rosenberg, N. 1982. Inside the Black Box: Technology and Economics. Boston, MA: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Ruttan, V. W. 2006. Is War Necessary for Economic Growth? Military Procurement and Technology Development. University of Minnesota: Department of Applied Economics.Google Scholar

Soete, L. and Arundel, A.. 1993. An Integrated Approach to European Innovation and Technology Diffusion Policy: A Maastricht Memorandum. Luxembourg: Commission of the European Communities, SPRINT Programme.Google Scholar

Stern, N. H. 2006. The Economics of Climate Change (Stern Review). HM Treasury.Google Scholar

Stirling, A. 2008. “Opening up” and “closing down” power, participation, and pluralism in the social appraisal of technology. Science, Technology & Human Values 33(2): 262–294.Google Scholar

Stirling, A. 2014. Making choices in the face of uncertainty. Themed Annual Report of the Government Chief Scientific Adviser, Chapter 2 (June). Draft mimeo.Google Scholar

Verspagen, B. 2006. Innovation and economic growth, in The Oxford Handbook of Innovation, ed. Fagerberg, J., Mowery, D. C., and Nelson, R. R., 487–513. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Vivarelli, M. 2013a. Is entrepreneurship necessarily good? Microeconomic evidence from developing and developed countries. Industrial and Corporate Change 22(6): 1453–1495.Google Scholar

Wade, R. 1990. Governing the Market: Economic Theory and the Role of Government in East Asian Industrialization. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar

Witt, U. 2003. Economic policy making in evolutionary perspective. Journal of Evolutionary Economics 13(2): 77–94.Google Scholar

Wood, R. 2012. Fallen Solyndra won bankruptcy battle but faces tax war. Forbes, June 11. (www.forbes.com/sites/robertwood/2012/11/06/fallen-solyndra-won-bankruptcy-battle-but-faces-tax-war/) (accessed June 29, 2014).Google Scholar

Ahuja, G., Lampert, C. M., and Tandon, V. 2008. Moving beyond Schumpeter: Management research on the determinants of technological innovation. The Academy of Management Annals 2(1): 1–98.Google Scholar

Alguezaui, S. and Filieri, R. 2010. Investigating the role of social capital in innovation: Sparse versus dense network. Journal of Knowledge Management 14(6): 891–909.Google Scholar

Appio, F. P., Cesaroni, F., and Di Minin, A. 2014. Visualizing the structure and bridges of the intellectual property management and strategy literature: A document co-citation analysis. Scientometrics 101(1): 623–661.Google Scholar

Arora, A., Fosfuri, A., and Gambardella, A. 2001. Markets for Technology: Economics of Innovation and Corporate Strategy. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar

Arora, A. and Gambardella, A. 1994. Evaluating technological information and utilizing it: scientific knowledge, technological capability, and external linkages in biotechnology. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization 24(1): 91–114.Google Scholar

Barney, J. 1991. Firm resources and sustained competitive advantage. Journal of Management 17(1): 99–120.Google Scholar

Baum, J., Calabrese, T., and Silverman, B. 2000. Don’t go alone: alliance network composition and startups’ performance in Canadian biotechnology. Strategic Management Journal 21: 267–294.Google Scholar

Baumgartner, H. and Pieters, R. 2003 The structural influence of marketing journals: a citation analysis of the discipline and its subareas over time. Journal of Marketing 17(2): 123–139.Google Scholar

Beall, J. and Kafadar, K. 2007 Measuring typographical errors’ impact on retrieval in bibliographic databases. Cataloging & Classification Quarterly 44(3–4): 197–211.Google Scholar

Beck, M. and Schenker-Wicki, A. 2014. Cooperating with external partners: the importance of diversity for innovation performance. European Journal of International Management 8(5): 548–569.Google Scholar

Belussi, F. and Orsi, L. 2016. (eds.) Innovation, Alliances, and Networks in High-Tech Environments. Abingdon: Routledge.Google Scholar

Bogers, M. and Lhuillery, S. 2011. A functional perspective on learning and innovation: Investigating the organization of absorptive capacity. Industry and Innovation 18(6): 581–610.Google Scholar

Borrás, S. and Tsagdis, D. 2008. Cluster Policies in Europe. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar Publishing.Google Scholar

Boyack, K. W. 2009. Using detailed maps of science to identify potential collaborations. Scientometrics 79(1): 27–44.Google Scholar

Boyack, K. W. and Klavans, R. 2010. Co-citation analysis, bibliographic coupling, and direct citation: Which citation approach represents the research front most accurately? Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology 61(12), 2389–2404.Google Scholar

Brass, D. J., Galaskiewicz, J., Greve, H. R., and Tsai, W. 2004. Taking stock of networks and organizations: A multilevel perspective. Academy of Management Journal 47(6): 795–817.Google Scholar

Bresman, H., Birkinshaw, J., and Nobel, R. 2010. Knowledge transfer in international acquisitions. Journal of International Business Studies 41(1): 5–20.Google Scholar

Brown, S. L. and Eisenhardt, K. M. 1997. The art of continuous change: Linking complexity theory and time-paced evolution in relentlessly shifting organizations. Administrative Science Quarterly 42(1): 1–34.Google Scholar

Casey, D. L. and McMillan, G. S. 2008. Identifying the ‘invisible colleges’ of the ‘industrial & labor relations review’: A bibliometric approach. Industrial and Labor Relations Review 62(1): 126–132.Google Scholar

Castro, I. and Roldán, J. L. 2013. A mediation model between dimensions of social capital. International Business Review 22(6): 1034–1050.Google Scholar

Chesbrough, H. 2003. The era of open innovation. The Mit Sloan Management Review Spring: 35–41.Google Scholar

Chesbrough, H. W. 2006, Open Business Models. How to Thrive in the New Innovation Landscape. Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press.Google Scholar

Cloodt, M., Hagedoorn, J., and Van Kranenburg, H. 2006. Mergers and acquisitions: Their effect on the innovative performance of companies in high-tech industries. Research Policy 35(5): 642–654.Google Scholar

Conner, K. R. and Prahalad, C. K. 1996. A resource-based theory of the firm: Knowledge versus opportunism. Organization Science 7(5): 477–501.Google Scholar

Czernek, K. and Czakon, W. 2016. Trust-building processes in tourist coopetition: The case of a Polish region. Tourism Management 52: 380–394.Google Scholar

Dacin, M. T., Hitt, M. A., and Levitas, E. 1997. Selecting partners for successful international alliances: Examination of US and Korean firms, Journal of World Business, 32(1): 3–16.Google Scholar

Dacin, M. T., Oliver, C., and Roy, J. P. (2007). The legitimacy of strategic alliances: An institutional perspective. Strategic Management Journal 28(2): 169–187.Google Scholar

Das, T. K. 2010. Researching strategic alliances: emerging perspectives. Charlotte, NC: IAP.Google Scholar

Das, T. K. and Teng, B. S. 1998. Between trust and control: Developing confidence in partner cooperation in alliances. Academy of Management Review 23(3): 491–512.Google Scholar

Das, T. K. and Teng, B. S. 2000. Instabilities of strategic alliances: An internal tensions perspective. Organization Science 11(1): 77–101.Google Scholar

De Bakker, F. G. A., Groenewegen, P., and Den Hond, F. 2005. A bibliometric analysis of 30 years of research and theory on corporate social responsibility and corporate social performance. Business & Society 44(3): 283–317.Google Scholar

Deeds, D. L. and Hill, C. W. 1996. Strategic alliances and the rate of new product development: An empirical study of entrepreneurial biotechnology firms. Journal of Business Venturing 11(1): 41–55.Google Scholar

del Brío, J. Á. and Junquera, B. 2003. A review of the literature on environmental innovation management in SMEs: Implications for public policies. Technovation 23(12): 939–948.Google Scholar

De Man, A. P. 2005. Alliance capability: A comparison of the alliance strength of European and American companies. European Management Journal 23(3): 315–323.Google Scholar

Deitz, G. D., Tokman, M., Richey, R. G., and Morgan, R. M. 2010. Joint venture stability and cooperation: Direct, indirect and contingent effects of resource complementarity and trust. Industrial Marketing Management 39(5): 862–873.Google Scholar

Doz, Y. and Hamel, G. 1998. Alliances Advantage. The Art of Creating Value through Partnering. Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press.Google Scholar

Dyer, J. H. 1997. Effective interfirm collaboration: How firms minimize transaction costs and maximise transaction value. Strategic Management Journal 17: 271–291.Google Scholar

Dyer, J. H. and Singh, H. 1998. The relational view: Cooperative strategy and sources of interorganizational competitive advantage. Academy of Management Review 23(4): 660–679.Google Scholar

Eisenhardt, K. M. and Schoonhoven, C. B. 1996. Resource-based view of strategic alliance formation: Strategic and social effects in entrepreneurial firms. Organization Science 7(2): 136–150.Google Scholar

Foss, N. J., Husted, K., and Michailova, S. 2010. Governing knowledge sharing in organizations: Levels of analysis, governance mechanisms, and research directions. Journal of Management studies 47(3): 455–482.Google Scholar

Francis, J., Mukherji, A., and Mukherji, J. 2009. Examining relational and resource influences on the performance of border region SMEs. International Business Review 18(4): 331–343.Google Scholar

Gans, J. and Stern, S. 2003. The product market and the market for ideas: Commercialization strategies for technology entrepreneurs. Research Policy 32(2): 333–350.Google Scholar

Ganzaroli, A., De Noni, I., Orsi, L., and Belussi, F. 2016. The combined effect of technological relatedness and knowledge utilization on explorative and exploitative invention performance post-M and A. European Journal of Innovation Management 19(2): 167–188.Google Scholar

Gillies, P. 1998. Effectiveness of alliances and partnerships for health promotion. Health Promotion International 13(2): 99–120.Google Scholar

Goerzen, A. 2007. Alliance networks and firm performance: The impact of repeated partnerships. Strategic Management Journal 28(5): 487–509.Google Scholar

Graebner, M. E. 2009. Caveat venditor: Trust asymmetries in acquisitions of entrepreneurial firms. Academy of management Journal 52(3): 435–472.Google Scholar

Graebner, M.E. and Eisenhardt, K.M., 2004. The seller’s side of the story: Acquisition as courtship and governance as syndicate in entrepreneurial firms. Administrative Science Quarterly 49(3): 366–403.Google Scholar

Grant, R. M. 1996. Prospering in dynamically-competitive environments: Organizational capability as knowledge integration. Organization Science 7(4): 375–387.Google Scholar

Gulati, R. 1995. Does familiarity breed trust? The implications of repeated ties for contractual choice in alliances. Academy of Management Journal 38(1): 85–112.Google Scholar

Gulati, R. 1998. Alliances and networks. Strategic Management Journal 19: 293–317.Google Scholar

Gulati, R. and Singh, H. 1998. The architecture of cooperation: Managing coordination costs and appropriation concerns in strategic alliances. Administrative Science Quarterly 43: 781–814.Google Scholar

Gulati, R., Sytch, M., and Tatarynowicz, A. 2012. The rise and fall of small worlds: Exploring the dynamics of social structure. Organization Science 23(2): 449–471.Google Scholar

Haeussler, C., Patzelt, H., and Zahra, S. A. 2012. Strategic alliances and product development in high technology new firms: The moderating effect of technological capabilities. Journal of Business Venturing 27(2): 217–233.Google Scholar

Hagedoorn, J. 2002, Inter-firm R&D partnerships: An overview of major trends and patterns since 1960. Research Policy 31(4): 477–492.Google Scholar

Hagedoorn, J. and Schakenraad, J. 1994. The effect of strategic technology alliances on company performance. Strategic Management Journal 15(4): 291–309.Google Scholar

Hagedoorn, J. and Duysters, G. 2002a. External sources of innovative capabilities: The preferences for strategic alliances or mergers and acquisitions. Journal of Management Studies 39(2): 167–188.Google Scholar

Hagedoorn, J. and Duysters, G. 2002b. The effect of mergers and acquisitions on the technological performance of companies in a high-tech environment. Technology Analysis & Strategic Management 14(1): 67–85.Google Scholar

Hagedoorn, J. and Wang, N. 2012. Is there complementarity or substitutability between internal and external R&D strategies? Research Policy 41(6): 1072–1083.Google Scholar

Hakanson, L. 1995. Learning through acquisitions: Management and integration of foreign R&D laboratories. International Studies of Management and Organization 25(1–2): 121–157.Google Scholar

Hamel, G. 1991. Competition for competence and interpartner learning within international strategic alliances. Strategic Management Journal 12(1): 83–103.Google Scholar

Hamel, G., Doz, Y. L., and Prahalad, C. K. 1989. Collaborate with your competitors and win. Harvard Business Review 67(1): 133–139.Google Scholar

Hardy, C., Phillips, N., and Lawrence, T. B. 2003. Resources, knowledge and influence: The organizational effects of interorganizational collaboration. Journal of Management Studies 40(2): 321–347.Google Scholar

Heimeriks, K. H., Duysters, G., and Vanhaverbeke, W. 2007. Learning mechanisms and differential performance in alliance portfolios. Strategic Organization 5(4): 373–408.Google Scholar

Hennart, J. F. 1988. A transaction costs theory of equity joint ventures. Strategic Management Journal 9(4): 361–374.Google Scholar

Hitt, M. A., Hoskisson, R. E., Johnson, R. A., and Moesel, D. D. 1996. The market for corporate control and firm innovation. Academy of Management Journal 39(5): 1084–1119.Google Scholar

Hoang, H. and Rothaermel, F. T. 2005. The effect of general and partner-specific alliance experience on joint R&D project performance. Academy of Management Journal 48(2): 332–345.Google Scholar

Holton, G. J. 2000. Einstein, History, and Other Passions: The Rebellion against Science at the End of the Twentieth Century. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar

Huggins, R. 2001. Inter-firm network policies and firm performance: evaluating the impact of initiatives in the United Kingdom. Research Policy 30(3): 443–458.Google Scholar

Huggins, R. and Johnston, A. 2010. Knowledge flow and inter-firm networks: The influence of network resources, spatial proximity and firm size. Entrepreneurship & Regional Development 22(5): 457–484.Google Scholar

Inkpen, A. and Beamish, P. W. 1997. Knowledge, bargaining power, and the instability of international joint ventures. Academy of Management Review 22(1): 177–202.Google Scholar

Jarneving, B. 2005. A comparison of two bibliometric methods for mapping of the research front. Scientometrics 65(2): 245–263.Google Scholar

Jarneving, B. 2007a. Bibliographic coupling and its application to research- front and other core documents. Journal of Informetrics 1(4): 287–307.Google Scholar

Jarneving, B. 2007b. Complete graphs and bibliographic coupling: A test of the applicability of bibliographic coupling for the identification of cognitive cores on the field level. Journal of Informetrics 1(4): 338–356.Google Scholar

Jiang, X., Li, M., Gao, S., Bao, Y., and Jiang, F. 2013. Managing knowledge leakage in strategic alliances: The effects of trust and formal contracts. Industrial Marketing Management 42(6): 983–991.Google Scholar

Kale, P., Singh, H., and Perlmutter, H. 2000. Learning and protection of proprietary assets in strategic alliances: Building relational capital. Strategic Management Journal 21(3): 217–237.Google Scholar

Kauser, S. and Shaw, V. 2004. The influence of behavioral and organizational characteristics on the success of international strategic alliances. International Marketing Review 21(1): 17–51.Google Scholar

Kogut, B. 1988. Joint ventures: Theoretical and empirical perspectives. Strategic Management Journal 9(4): 319–332.Google Scholar

Larsson, R., Bengtsson, L., Henriksson, K., and Sparks, J. 1998. The interorganizational learning dilemma: Collective knowledge development in strategic alliances. Organization Science 9(3): 285–305.Google Scholar

Lavie, D. 2007. Alliance portfolios and firm performance: A study of value creation and appropriation in the US software industry. Strategic Management Journal 28(12): 1187–1212.Google Scholar

Lavie, D. and Drori, I. 2012. Collaborating for knowledge creation and application: The case of nanotechnology research programs. Organization Science 23(3): 704–724.Google Scholar

Lavie, D. and Miller, S. R. 2008. Alliance portfolio internationalization and firm performance. Organization Science 19(4): 623–646.Google Scholar

Lei, D. T. 2000. Industry evolution and competence development: The imperatives of technological convergence. International Journal of Technology Management 19 (7–8): 699–738.Google Scholar

Levitt, B. and March, J. G. 1988. Organizational learning. Annual Review of Sociology 14: 19–340.Google Scholar

Ling, T. J. and Chen, Y. Y. 2012. Changes in the intellectual structure of Strategic Alliances Research 1980–2010. Management Review 31, October: 131–141.Google Scholar

Liu, C. L. E., Ghauri, P. N., and Sinkovics, R. R. 2010. Understanding the impact of relational capital and organizational learning on alliance outcomes. Journal of World Business 45(3): 237–249.Google Scholar

MacRoberts, M. H. and MacRoberts, B. R. 2007. Problems of citation analysis: a critical review. Journal of the American Society for Information Science 40(5): 342–349.Google Scholar

Mohr, J. and Spekman, R. 1994. Characteristics of partnership success: Partnership attributes, communication behavior, and conflict resolution techniques. Strategic Management Journal 15(2): 135–152.Google Scholar

Mowery, D., Oxley, J. and Silverman, B. 1996. Strategic alliances and interfirm knowledge transfer. Strategic Management Journal 17 (Suppl. Winter): 77–91.Google Scholar

Nelson, R. 1991. Why do firms differ, and how does it matter? Strategic Management Journal 12: 61–74.Google Scholar

Nielsen, B. B. 2007. Determining international strategic alliance performance: A multidimensional approach. International Business Review 16(3): 337–361.Google Scholar

Niosi, J. 1995. Flexible Innovation: Technological Alliances in Canadian Industry. Montreal: McGill-Queen’s Press-MQUP.Google Scholar

Niosi, J. 2003. Alliances are not enough explaining rapid growth in biotech firms. Research Policy 32(5): 737–750.Google Scholar

Nonaka, I. 1991. The knowledge-creating company. Harvard Business Review 69(6): 96–104.Google Scholar

Park, B. J. R., Srivastava, M. K., and Gnyawali, D. R. 2014. Walking the tight rope of coopetition: Impact of competition and cooperation intensities and balance on firm innovation performance. Industrial Marketing Management 43(2): 210–221.Google Scholar

Parkhe, A. 1993 Strategic alliance structuring: A game theoretic and transaction cost examination of interfirm cooperation. Academy of Management Journal 36(4): 794–829.Google Scholar

Persson, O., Danell, R., and Schneider, J. W. 2009. How to use Bibexcel for various types of bibliometric analysis. Celebrating scholarly communication studies: A Festschrift for Olle Persson at his 60th Birthday, 9–24.Google Scholar

Phelps, C. C. 2010. A longitudinal study of the influence of alliance network structure and composition on firm exploratory innovation. Academy of Management Journal 53(4): 890–913.Google Scholar

Phelps, C., Heidl, R., and Wadhwa, A. 2012. Knowledge, networks, and knowledge networks a review and research agenda. Journal of Management 38(4): 1115–1166.Google Scholar

Powell, W. W., Koput, K. W., and Smith-Doerr, L. 1996. Interorganizational collaboration and the locus of innovation: Networks of learning in biotechnology. Administrative Science Quarterly 41(1): 116–145.Google Scholar

Reid, D., Bussiere, D., and Greenaway, K. 2001. Alliance formation issues for knowledge-based enterprises. International Journal of Management Reviews 3(1): 79–100.Google Scholar

Rice, J., Liao, T. S., Martin, N., and Galvin, P. 2012. The role of strategic alliances in complementing firm capabilities. Journal of Management & Organization 18(6): 858–869.Google Scholar

Ritala, P. and Hurmelinna-Laukkanen, P. 2009. What’s in it for me? Creating and appropriating value in innovation-related coopetition. Technovation 29(12): 819–828.Google Scholar

Ritala, P. and Sainio, L. M. 2014. Coopetition for radical innovation: technology, market and business-model perspectives. Technology Analysis & Strategic Management 26(2): 155–169.Google Scholar

Rivera-Santos, M. and Rufín, C. 2010. Odd couples: Understanding the governance of firm–NGO alliances. Journal of Business Ethics 94(1): 55–70.Google Scholar

Rosenkopf, L. and Almeida, P. 2003. Overcoming local search through alliances and mobility. Management Science 49(6): 751–766.Google Scholar

Rosenkopf, L. and Nerkar, A. 2001. Beyond local search: Boundary-spanning, exploration, and impact in the optical disk industry. Strategic Management Journal 22(4): 287–306.Google Scholar

Rothaermel, F. T. and Deeds, D. L. 2004. Exploration and exploitation alliances in biotechnology: A system of new product development. Strategic Management Journal 25(3): 201–221.Google Scholar

Rothaermel, F. T. and Deeds, D. L. 2006. Alliance type, alliance experience and alliance management capability in high-technology ventures. Journal of Business Venturing 21(4): 429–460.Google Scholar

Rumelt, R. P. 1974. Strategy, Structure, and Economic Performance. Boston, MA: Division of Research, Graduate School of Business Administration, Harvard University.Google Scholar

Sánchez-Peinado, L. and Menguzzato-Boulard, M. 2009. Antecedents of entry mode choice when diversifying. Industrial Marketing Management 38(8): 971–983.Google Scholar

Sandström, U. 2009. Bibliometric Evaluation of Research Programs: A Study of Scientific Quality. Report 6321: Swedish Environmental Protection Agency.Google Scholar

Schildt, H. A., Zahra, S. A., and Sillanpää, A. 2006. Scholarly communities in entrepreneurship research: A co-citation analysis. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice 30(3): 399–415.Google Scholar

Schilke, O. and Cook, K. S. 2015. Sources of alliance partner trustworthiness: Integrating calculative and relational perspectives. Strategic Management Journal 36(2): 276–297.Google Scholar

Schuler, R. S. 2001. Human resource issues and activities in international joint ventures. International Journal of Human Resource Management 12(1): 1–52.Google Scholar

Shan, W., Walker, G., and Kogut, B. 1994. Interfirm cooperation and startup innovation in the biotechnology industry. Strategic management journal 15(5): 387–394.Google Scholar

Silva, S. C., Bradley, F., and Sousa, C. M. 2012. Empirical test of the trust–performance link in an international alliances context. International Business Review 21(2): 293–306.Google Scholar

Small, H. 1999. Visualizing science by citation mapping. Journal of the American Society for Information Science 50(9): 799–813.Google Scholar

Talke, K. and Hultink, E. J. 2010. Managing diffusion barriers when launching new products. Journal of Product Innovation Management 27(4): 537–553.Google Scholar

Tian, Y., Li, Y., and Wei, Z. 2013. Managerial incentive and external knowledge acquisition under technological uncertainty: A nested system perspective. Systems Research and Behavioral Science 30(3): 214–228.Google Scholar

Tjemkes, B., Vos, P., and Burgers, K. 2013. Strategic Alliance Management. London: Routledge.Google Scholar

Tsai, H. H. and Yang, J. M. 2010. Analysis of knowledge management trend by bibliometric approach. Proceeding (s) of the WASET on Knowledge Management 62(1): 174–178.Google Scholar

Uhlenbruck, K., Hitt, M.A., and Semadeni, M. 2006. Market value effects of acquisitions involving Internet firms: A resource-based analysis. Strategic Management Journal 27(10): 899–913.Google Scholar

Vermeulen, F. and Barkema, H. 2001. Learning through acquisitions. Academy of Management Journal 44(3): 457–476.Google Scholar

Wei, H. L., Wong, C. W., and Lai, K. H. 2012. Linking inter-organizational trust with logistics information integration and partner cooperation under environmental uncertainty. International Journal of Production Economics 139(2): 642–653.Google Scholar

Werner, S. 2002. Recent developments in international management research: A review of 20 top management journals. Journal of Management 28(3): 277–305.Google Scholar

Wernerfelt, B. 1995. The resource-based view of the firm: Ten years after. Strategic Management Journal 16(3): 171–174.Google Scholar

White, H. D. and McCain, K. W. 1998 Visualizing a discipline: An author co-citation analysis of information science, 1972–1995. Journal of the American Society for Information Science 49(4): 327–355.Google Scholar

Yang, S. M., Fang, S. C., Fang, S. R., and Chou, C. H. 2014. Knowledge exchange and knowledge protection in interorganizational learning: The ambidexterity perspective. Industrial Marketing Management 43(2): 346–358.Google Scholar

Zahra, S. A. and George, G. 2002. Absorptive capacity: A review, reconceptualization, and extension. Academy of Management Review 27(2): 185–203.Google Scholar