Book contents
- Innovation Systems, Policy and Management
- Innovation Systems, Policy and Management
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Figures
- Tables
- Contributors
- Preface
- Acknowledgements
- Abbreviations
- Introduction
- Part I Innovation Policy and Innovation Systems
- Part II Innovation in Developing and Emerging Countries
- Part III Regional Innovation Systems and Policies
- 10 Innovation Policies and New Regional Growth Paths
- 11 Spinoffs and Clustering
- 12 Examining the Technological Innovation Systems of Smart Cities
- 13 Agglomeration of Invention in the Bay Area
- Part IV Innovation Management and its Links with Policy
- Index
- References
12 - Examining the Technological Innovation Systems of Smart Cities
The Case of Japan and Implications for Public Policy and Institutional Design
from Part III - Regional Innovation Systems and Policies
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 10 August 2018
Edited by
Book contents
- Innovation Systems, Policy and Management
- Innovation Systems, Policy and Management
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Figures
- Tables
- Contributors
- Preface
- Acknowledgements
- Abbreviations
- Introduction
- Part I Innovation Policy and Innovation Systems
- Part II Innovation in Developing and Emerging Countries
- Part III Regional Innovation Systems and Policies
- 10 Innovation Policies and New Regional Growth Paths
- 11 Spinoffs and Clustering
- 12 Examining the Technological Innovation Systems of Smart Cities
- 13 Agglomeration of Invention in the Bay Area
- Part IV Innovation Management and its Links with Policy
- Index
- References
Summary
Smart cities are considered as a key area where innovation plays a critical role in making system transformation toward sustainability. Smart cites are based on advanced systems of hardware and software for mutual exchanges of energy and information between supply and demand sides for efficient, flexible, and resilient services, incorporating the behavior of different actors including generators, distributors, technology developers, and consumers through an intelligent network. Improvement in the efficiency of energy consumption will reduce emissions coming from energy generation, particularly those from coal power plants. Flexibility in balancing energy supply and demand through smart meters and affiliated technologies will facilitate the introduction of renewable energy sources such as solar and wind, substituting pollution-laden fossil fuels. Electrification of urban infrastructure will also support the deployment of electric vehicles, which do not emit pollutants, unlike the conventional vehicles driven by internal combustion engines.
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- Innovation Systems, Policy and Management , pp. 394 - 417Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2018
References
Bergek, B. Carlsson, S. Jacobsson, S. Lindmark, and A. Rickne, . 2008. Analyzing the functional dynamics of technological innovation systems: A scheme of analysis. Research Policy 37: 407–429.Google Scholar
Bergek, Anna, Jacobsson, Staffan, Carlsson, Bo, Lindmark, Sven, and Rickne, Annika. 2008. Analyzing the functional dynamics of technological innovation systems: A scheme of analysis. Research Policy 37: 407–429.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carlsson, B. and Stankiewicz, R.. 1991. On the nature, function, and composition of technological systems. Journal of Evolutionary Economics 1: 93–118.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clastres, Cédric. 2011. Smart grids: Another step towards competition, energy security and climate change objectives. Energy Policy 39(9): 5399–5408.Google Scholar
Dasher, Richard B. 2012. The outlook for smart grids, in Fresh Currents – Japan’s Flow from a Nuclear Past to a Renewable Future. Kyoto: Kyoto Journal, Heian-kyo Media.Google Scholar
ECHONET Consortium. 2013a). Application Areas. Retrieved on February 12, 2013. ECHONET Consortium. www.echonet.gr.jp/english/echo/application.htm.Google Scholar
ECHONET Consortium. 2013b). List of Members. Retrieved on February 12, 2013. ECHONET Consortium. www.echonet.gr.jp/english/membership/kigyo.htm.Google Scholar
European Technology Platform for Electricity Networks for the Future. 2016. The SmartGrid European Technology Platform. European Technology Platform for Electricity Networks for the Future. www.smartgrids.eu/ETPSmartGrids. Accessed on February 1, 2016.Google Scholar
Freeman, Christopher. 1988. Japan: A new national innovation system?, in Technical Change and Economic Theory. London: Pinter Publishers.Google Scholar
Hirai, Toshihiro (2013). Personal interview, Tokyo Institute of Technology, Tokyo, February 18.Google Scholar
Jacobsson, Staffan and Bergek, Anna. 2004. Transforming the energy sector: The evolution of technological systems in renewable energy technology. Industrial and Corporate Change 13(5): 815–849.Google Scholar
Japan Smart Community Alliance. 2013. Membership (as of February 8, 2013). Retrieved February 13, 2013. Japan Smart Community Alliance: www.smart-japan.org/memberslist/tabid/189/Default.aspx.Google Scholar
Kamp, Linda, Smits, Ruud, and Andriesse, Cornelis. 2004. Notions on learning applied to wind turbine development in the Netherlands and Denmark. Energy Policy 32: 1625–1637.Google Scholar
Lin, Chen-Chun, Yang, Chia-Han, and Shyua, Joseph Z.. 2013. A comparison of innovation policy in the smart grid industry across the pacific: China and the USA. Energy Policy 57: 119–132.Google Scholar
Lundvall, Bengt-Ake. 1988. Innovation as an interactive process: From user-producer interaction to the national system of innovation, in Dosi, Giovanni, Freeman, Christopher, Nelson, Richard, Silverberg, Gerald, and Soete, Luc (eds.), Technical Change and Economic Theory. London: Pinter.Google Scholar
Malerba, Franco. 2002. Sectoral systems of innovation and production. Research Policy 31(2): 247–264.Google Scholar
Malerba, Franco, ed. 2004. Sectoral Systems of Innovation: Concepts, Issues and Analyses of Six Major Sectors in Europe. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Malerba, Franco and Adams, Pamela. 2014. Sectoral systems of innovation, in Dodgson, Mark, Gann, David M., and Phillips, Nelson (eds.), Oxford Handbook of Innovation Management. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Morozumi, Satoshi. 2010. NEDO’s Grid Connection Related Research Activities. Expert Group on New and Renewable Energy Technologies.Google Scholar
Nelson, Richard, ed. 1993. National Innovation Systems: A Comparative Analysis. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nelson, Richard R. 1994. The co-evolution of technology, industrial structure, and supporting institutions. Industrial and Corporate Change 3(1): 47–63.Google Scholar
Nelson, Richard R. 1995. Co-evolution of industry structure, technology and supporting institutions, and the making of comparative advantage. International Journal of the Economics of Business 2(2): 171–184.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Office of Energy and Environmental Industries. 2012. Japan’s Electricity Market and Opportunities for U.S. Renewable Energy and Smart Grid Exporters. Market Intelligence Brief, Manufacturing and Services, International Trade Administration, Department of Commerce, United States.Google Scholar
Smith, Adrian, Stirling, Andy, and Berkhout, Frans. 2005. The governance of sustainable socio-technical transitions. Research Policy 34: 1491–1510.Google Scholar
Suurs, Roald. 2009. Motors of Sustainable Innovation: Towards a Theory on the Dynamics of Technological Innovation Systems. Utrecht: University of Utrecht.Google Scholar
Vlieger, Esther and Leydesdorff, Loet. 2010. How to Analyze Frames Using Semantic Maps of a Collection of Messages?: Pajek Manual. leydesdorff.net, Amsterdam: Amsterdam School of Communications Research (ASCoR), University of Amsterdam.Google Scholar
- 4
- Cited by