Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-m6dg7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-08T02:41:58.918Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

15 - A Quantitative Model of Information Processing in CA1

from Part Four - Formal Analysis

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  04 May 2010

Roland Baddeley
Affiliation:
University of Oxford
Peter Hancock
Affiliation:
University of Stirling
Peter Földiák
Affiliation:
University of St Andrews, Scotland
Get access

Summary

Introduction

The hippocampus is anatomically and neurophysiologically one of the best known structures of the mammalian brain (for a review, see Witter, 1993). Besides, it plays a fundamental role in memory storage (for a review, see Squire, 1992), and has extensive connections with many areas of the neocortex, both incoming and outgoing, through the entorhinal cortex (Squire et al., 1989). Partly for these reasons, the hippocampus has been the object of several theoretical investigations and models. One of the most widespread functional hypotheses is that the hippocampus has the role of a fast episodic memory, and has to perform cued retrieval to release information to the neocortex, in which memory is slowly reorganized in semantic structures (see, e.g. McClelland et al., 1995). The hippocampus may be not a permanent store for episodes; it appears experimentally that there exists “hippocampal” forgetting (Zola-Morgan and Squire, 1990), even if the relation of typical forgetting times with the storage of the same information in neocortex is not known. In any case, it is likely that information is stored in the hippocampus, and a mechanism for retrieving it from the hippocampus is needed (Rolls, 1995).

Here we introduce a model of the information flow in the hippocampal system, focusing on the role of the connections between entorhinal cortex, CA3 and CA1. We note that our model is independent of the functional hypotheses just described, and of the detailed implications of behavioural theories. We base the model on neuroanatomical and physiological evidence, though with some form of approximation to allow for an analytical development.

Type
Chapter
Information
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2000

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure [email protected] is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×