Book contents
- Individualized In-Vitro Fertilization
- Individualized In-Vitro Fertilization
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Contributors
- Chapter 1 Individualized Ovarian Stimulation for Normal and High Responders
- Chapter 2 Individualized Ovarian Stimulation in Patients with Advanced Maternal Age and Premature Ovarian Aging
- Chapter 3 Individualized Oocyte Maturation
- Chapter 4 Individualized Luteal Phase Support
- Chapter 5 Individualized Management of Male Infertility
- Chapter 6 Individualized Fertilization Technique in the IVF Laboratory
- Chapter 7 Individualized Genetic Testing
- Chapter 8 Individualized Embryo Selection
- Chapter 9 Preparation for Optimal Endometrial Receptivity in Cryo Cycles
- Chapter 10 Individualized Immunological Testing in Recurrent Implantation Failure
- Chapter 11 Individualized Embryo Transfer
- Index
- Plate Section (PDF Only)
- References
Chapter 5 - Individualized Management of Male Infertility
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 12 February 2021
Book contents
- Individualized In-Vitro Fertilization
- Individualized In-Vitro Fertilization
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Contributors
- Chapter 1 Individualized Ovarian Stimulation for Normal and High Responders
- Chapter 2 Individualized Ovarian Stimulation in Patients with Advanced Maternal Age and Premature Ovarian Aging
- Chapter 3 Individualized Oocyte Maturation
- Chapter 4 Individualized Luteal Phase Support
- Chapter 5 Individualized Management of Male Infertility
- Chapter 6 Individualized Fertilization Technique in the IVF Laboratory
- Chapter 7 Individualized Genetic Testing
- Chapter 8 Individualized Embryo Selection
- Chapter 9 Preparation for Optimal Endometrial Receptivity in Cryo Cycles
- Chapter 10 Individualized Immunological Testing in Recurrent Implantation Failure
- Chapter 11 Individualized Embryo Transfer
- Index
- Plate Section (PDF Only)
- References
Summary
Approximately 8–15 percent of couples are unable to conceive after 1 year of unprotected intercourse, and they are thereby considered infertile; this problem has become a global health concern, affecting roughly 187 million couples worldwide (). Male factor infertility occurs in 40–50 percent of the infertile couples, being solely responsible in approximately 20 percent of cases and in association with a female factor in another 20–30 percent. Although the male factor infertility is traditionally defined by the presence of abnormal semen parameters, it can nowadays be considered even when the seminal analysis is normal but with abnormal functional sperm tests ().
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- Individualized In-Vitro FertilizationDelivering Precision Fertility Treatment, pp. 50 - 64Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2021
References
Agarwal, A, Majzoub, A, Parekh, N, et al. A schematic overview of the current status of male infertility practice. World J Mens Health 2019;37. doi:10.5534/wjmh.190068.Google Scholar
Diagnostic evaluation of the infertile male: a committee opinion. Fertil Steril 2015;103(3):e18–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Virtanen, HE, Jørgensen, N, Toppari, J. Semen quality in the 21st century. Nat Rev Urol 2017;14(2):120–130.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Esteves, SC, Agarwal, A. Novel concepts in male infertility. Int Braz J Urol 2011;37(1):5–15.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Dabaja, AA, Schlegel, PN. Medical treatment of male infertility. Transl Androl Urol 2014;3(1):8.Google Scholar
Neto, FTL, Bach, PV, Najari, BB, et al. Spermatogenesis in humans and its affecting factors. Semin Cell Dev Biol 2016;59:10–26.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Agarwal, A, Cho, C-L, Majzoub, A, et al. The Society for Translational Medicine: clinical practice guidelines for sperm DNA fragmentation testing in male infertility. Transl Androl Urol 2017;6(S4):S720–733.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jungwirth, A, Giwercman, A, Tournaye, H, et al. European Association of Urology Guidelines on Male Infertility: the 2012 update. Eur Urol 2012;62(2):324–332.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kruger, TF, Acosta, AA, Simmons, KF, et al. Predictive value of abnormal sperm morphology in in vitro fertilization. Fertil Steril 1988;49(1):112–117.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Esteves, SC, Zini, A, Aziz, N, et al. Critical appraisal of World Health Organization’s new reference values for human semen characteristics and effect on diagnosis and treatment of subfertile men. Urology 2012;79(1):16–22.Google Scholar
Agarwal, A, Majzoub, A, Parekh, N, et al. A schematic overview of the current status of male infertility practice. World J Mens Health 2019;37. doi:10.5534/wjmh.190068.Google Scholar
Management of nonobstructive azoospermia: a committee opinion. Fertil Steril 2018;110(7):1239–1245.Google Scholar
Hwang, K, Smith, JF, Coward, RM, et al. Evaluation of the azoospermic male: a committee opinion. Fertil Steril 2018;109(5):777–782.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Esteves, SC. Novel concepts in male factor infertility: clinical and laboratory perspectives. J Assist Reprod Genet 2016;33(10):1319–1335.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Smits, RM, Mackenzie-Proctor, R, Yazdani, A, et al. Antioxidants for male subfertility. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2019;3:CD007411. doi:10.1002/14651858.CD007411.pub4.Google Scholar
Jensen, CFS, Østergren, P, Dupree, JM, et al. Varicocele and male infertility. Nat Rev Urol 2017;14(9):523–533.Google Scholar
Esteves, SC, Agarwal, A. Afterword to varicocele and male infertility: current concepts and future perspectives. Asian J Androl 2016;18(2):319–322. doi:10.4103/1008-682X.172820.Google Scholar
Report on varicocele and infertility: a committee opinion. Fertil Steril 2014;102(6):1556–1560.Google Scholar
Miyaoka, R, Esteves, SC. A critical appraisal on the role of varicocele in male infertility. Adv Urol 2012;2012:1–9.Google Scholar
Agarwal, A, Hamada, A, Esteves, SC. Insight into oxidative stress in varicocele-associated male infertility: part 1. Nat Rev Urol 2012;9(12):678–690.Google Scholar
Esteves, S. Clinical management of infertile men with nonobstructive azoospermia. Asian J Androl 2015;17(3):459–470.Google Scholar
The management of obstructive azoospermia: a committee opinion. Fertil Steril 2019;111(5):873–880.Google Scholar
Esteves, SC. Interventions to prevent sperm DNA damage effects on reproduction. Adv Exp Med Biol 2019;1166:119–148. doi:10.1007/978-3-030-21664-1_8.Google Scholar
Esteves, SC, Santi, D, Simoni, M. An update on clinical and surgical interventions to reduce sperm DNA fragmentation in infertile men. Andrology 2019;6:andr.12724.Google Scholar
Roque, M, Esteves, SC. Effect of varicocele repair on sperm DNA fragmentation: a review. Int Urol Nephrol 2018;50(4):583–603.Google Scholar