Taken together as a series, the three woodcut prints by Hans Baldung (c.1484‒1545), dated 1534 and depicting horses in a forest, have beennearly universally interpreted as a condemnation of unbridled humansexuality and the violence and chaos that follow in its wake. Thatinterpretation is surely, if partially, correct. The viewer of the prints isforced to bear uncomfortable witness to the stallion's powerful andshockingly explicit sexual arousal (fig. 7.1), to the explosion of maleorgasm robbed of procreative potential (fig. 7.2), and to the subsequentfrenetic brutality that results (fig. 7.3). Sexuality is depicted here asliterally bestial, uncontrollable, and dangerous. How mightsixteenth-century viewers have responded to these unusual and unsettlingimages? More precisely, and to address specifically the issues explored inthis volume, would the spectrum of their response have included finding theimages indecent?

My essay proposes that Baldung's prints would have been understood asobscene, and that they also would have provoked laughter. I suggest thatBaldung used obscene humour as a particularly effective strategy to critiquenot just human sexuality in general but normative sexual expressions andpractices as formulated in his own day. In addition to the concept andexercise of obscene humour in sexual imagery, Baldung's prints add afurther facet to the consideration of indecent bodies in this volume. In hiswoodcuts, the bodies in question belong to horses. Rather than assuming thatBaldung merely settled for equine bodies as an acceptable substitute for thehuman form, this essay posits that Baldung affirmatively chose horses toconvey his obscenely humorous response to sexual norms.