Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-fbnjt Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-09T09:46:16.159Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

11 - Accessing and benefit sharing avian influenza viruses through the World Health Organization: a CBD and TRIPS compromise thanks to Indonesia's sovereignty claim?

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  04 August 2010

Thomas Pogge
Affiliation:
Yale University, Connecticut
Matthew Rimmer
Affiliation:
Australian National University, Canberra
Kim Rubenstein
Affiliation:
Australian National University, Canberra
Get access

Summary

Introduction

The potential of avian influenza to infect humans on a pandemic scale with high mortality has created a new challenge for the United Nations Convention on Biological Diversity (‘CBD’) and the World Trade Organization's (‘WTO’) Agreement on Trade-Related Aspects of Intellectual Property Rights (‘TRIPS’ or ‘TRIPS Agreement’). The challenge arises in the context of the legal arrangements for access and sharing of the influenza virus and the likely benefits resulting from that sharing. It is encapsulated in the following:

A deal is being negotiated that could see Indonesia end its policy of withholding samples from human cases of avian flu. Until now, Indonesia has refused to share its samples with the World Health Organization (WHO), saying it is unfair that ownership of the samples passes to the WHO collaborating centres, and that it does not benefit from any resulting papers or patents.

Indonesia says it will share samples under a material transfer agreement that allows research use, but gives Indonesia sovereign ownership of the samples. The country also wants access to vaccines developed using its samples. An international meeting [in November 2007] ended without agreement. But a statement, still being thrashed out by negotiators, is expected to open the way to concessions.

There is a broadly accepted potential that vaccines can play a key role in limiting the impact of an avian influenza pandemic, although the most efficient and effective response requires access to the virus to make the appropriate vaccines.

Type
Chapter
Information
Incentives for Global Public Health
Patent Law and Access to Essential Medicines
, pp. 284 - 312
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2010

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure [email protected] is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×