Albers, , H. (2010). Spatial modeling of extraction and enforcement in developing country protected areas. Resource and Energy Economics, 32(2), 165–179.Google Scholar

An, B., Brown, M., Vorobeychik, Y., & Tambe, M. (2013). Security games with surveillance cost and optimal timing of attack execution. In Proceedings of the 12th International Conference on Autonomous Agents and Multiagent Systems (AAMAS) (pp. 223–230).Google Scholar

An, B., Jain, M., Tambe, M., & Kiekintveld, C. (2011). Mixed-initiative optimization in security games: A preliminary report. In Proceedings of the AAAI Spring Symposium on Help Me Help You: Bridging the Gaps in Human–Agent Collaboration (pp. 8–11).Google Scholar

An, B., Kempe, D., Kiekintveld, C., Shieh, E., Singh, S., Tambe, M., & Vorobeychik, Y. (2012). Security games with limited surveillance. In Proceedings of the 26th Conference on Artificial Intelligence (AAAI) (pp. 1241–1248).Google Scholar

An, B., Ordóñez, F., Tambe, M., Shieh, E., Yang, R., Baldwin, C., DiRenzo, J., Moretti, K., Maule, B., & Meyer, G. (2013). A deployed quantal response-based patrol planning system for the U.S. Coast Guard. Interfaces, 43(5), 400–420.Google Scholar

An, B., Pita, J., Shieh, E., Tambe, M., Kiekintveld, C., & Marecki, J. (2011, March). GUARDS and PROTECT: Next generation applications of security games. SIGECOM, 10, 31–34.Google Scholar

An, B., Tambe, M., Ordóñez, F., Shieh, E., & Kiekintveld, C. (2011) Refinement of strong Stackelberg equilibria in security games. In Proceedings of the 25th Conference on Artificial Intelligence (pp. 587–593).Google Scholar

Basilico, N., Gatti, N., & Amigoni, F. (2009). Leader-follower strategies for robotic patrolling in environments with arbitrary topologies. In Proceedings of the 8th International Conference on Autonomous Agents and Multiagent Systems (AAMAS) (pp. 500–503).Google Scholar

Blocki, J., Christin, N., Datta, A., Procaccia, A. D., & Sinha, A. (2013). Audit games. In Proceedings of the 23rd International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence (pp. 41–47).Google Scholar

Blocki, J., Christin, N., Datta, A., Procaccia, A. D., & Sinha, A. (2015). Audit games with multiple defender resources. In AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence (AAAI) (pp. 791–797).Google Scholar

Fang, F., Jiang, A. X., & Tambe, M. (2013). Optimal patrol strategy for protecting moving targets with multiple mobile resources. In Proceedings of the 12th International Conference on Autonomous Agents and Multiagent Systems (AAMAS) (pp. 957–964).Google Scholar

Fang, F., Nguyen, T. H., Pickles, R., Lam, W. Y., Clements, G. R., An, B., Singh, A., Tambe, M., & Lemieux, A. (2016). Deploying PAWS: Field optimization of the protection assistant for wildlife security. In IAAI (pp. 3966–3973).Google Scholar

Fang, F., Stone, P., & Tambe, M. (2015). When security games go green: Designing defender strategies to prevent poaching and illegal fishing. In Proceedings of the 24th International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence (IJCAI) (pp. 2589–2595).Google Scholar

Fave, F. M., Brown, M., Zhang, C., Shieh, E., Jiang, A., Rosoff, H., Tambe, M., & Sullivan, J. (2014). Security games in the field: Deployments on a transit system. In Dalpiaz, F., Dix, J., & van Riemsdijk, M. (Eds.), Engineering multi-agent systems, volume 8758 of Lecture Notes in Computer Science, pages 103–126.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Jain, M., Kardes, E., Kiekintveld, C., Ordóñez, F., & Tambe, M. (2010). Security games with arbitrary schedules: A branch and price approach. In Proceedings of the 24th AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence (pp. 792–797).Google Scholar

Jain, M., Korzhyk, D., Vanek, O., Pechoucek, M., Conitzer, V., & Tambe, M. (2011). A double oracle algorithm for zero-sum security games on graphs. In Proceedings of the 10th International Conference on Autonomous Agents and Multiagent Systems (AAMAS) (pp. 327–334).Google Scholar

Jain, M., Tambe, M., & Conitzer, V. (n.d.). Security scheduling for real-world networks. In Proceedings of the 12th International Conference on Autonomous Agents and Multiagent Systems (AAMAS) (pp. 215–222).Google Scholar

Jain, M., Tsai, J., Pita, J., Kiekintveld, C., Rathi, S., Tambe, M., & Ordóñez, F. (2010). Software assistants for randomized patrol planning for the LAX airport police and the federal air marshal service. Interfaces, 40(4), 267–290.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Jiang, A. X., Nguyen, T. H., Tambe, M., & Procaccia, A. D. (2013). Monotonic maximin: A robust Stackelberg solution against boundedly rational followers. In Proceedings of the Conference on Decision and Game Theory for Security (GameSec) (pp. 119–139).Google Scholar

Jiang, A., Yin, Z., Kraus, S., Zhang, C., & Tambe, M. (n.d.) Game-theoretic randomization for security patrolling with dynamic execution uncertainty. In Proceedings of the 12th International Conference on Autonomous Agents and Multiagent Systems (AAMAS) (pp. 207–214).Google Scholar

Johnson, M., Fang, F., Yang, R., Tambe, M., & Albers, H. (2012). Patrolling to maximize pristine forest area. In Proceedings of the AAAI Spring Symposium on Game Theory for Security, Sustainability and Health.Google Scholar

Kahneman, D., & Tvesky, A. (1979). Prospect theory: An analysis of decision under risk. Econometrica, 47(2), 263–291.Google Scholar

Kiekintveld, C., Marecki, J., & Tambe, M. (2011). Approximation methods for infinite Bayesian Stackelberg games: Modeling distributional uncertainty. In Proceedings of the 10th International Conference on Autonomous Agents and Multiagent Systems (AAMAS) (pp. 1005–1012).Google Scholar

Korzhyk, D., Conitzer, V., & Parr, R. (2010). Complexity of computing optimal Stackelberg strategies in security resource allocation games. In Proceedings of the 24th AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence (pp. 805–810).Google Scholar

Kukreja, N., Halfond, W. G., & Tambe, M. (2013). Randomizing regression tests using game theory. In Automated Software Engineering (ASE), 2013 IEEE/ACM 28th International Conference on Artificial Intelligence (pp. 616–621).Google Scholar

Li, Y., & Conitzer, V. (2013). Game-theoretic question selection for tests. In Proceedings of the 23rd International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence (pp. 254–262).Google Scholar

Luber, S., Yin, Z., Fave, F. D., Jiang, A. X., Tambe, M., & Sullivan, J. P. (2013). Game-theoretic patrol strategies for transit systems: The trusts system and its mobile app (demonstration). In International Conference on Autonomous Agents and Multiagent Systems (AAMAS)[Demonstrations Track] (pp. 1377–1378).Google Scholar

McKelvey, R.D., & Palfrey, T. R. (1995). Quantal response equilibria for normal form games. Games and Economic Behavior, 10(1), 6–38.Google Scholar

Nguyen, T., Yadav, A., An, B., Tambe, M., & Boutilier, C. (2014). Regret-based optimization and preference elicitation for Stackelberg security games with uncertainty. In Proceedings of the 28th International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence (pp. 756–762).Google Scholar

Nguyen, T. H., Yang, R., Azaria, A., Kraus, S., & Tambe, M. (2013). Analyzing the effectiveness of adversary modeling in security games. In Conference on Artificial Intelligence (AAAI) (pp. 718–724).Google Scholar

Paruchuri, P., Pearce, J. P., Marecki, J., Tambe, M., Ordóñez, F., & Kraus, S. (2008). Playing games with security: An efficient exact algorithm for Bayesian Stackelberg games. In Proceedings of the 7th International Conference on Autonomous Agents and Multiagent Systems (AAMAS) (pp. 895–902).Google Scholar

Pita, J., Jain, M., Tambe, M., Ordóñez, F., & Kraus, S. (2010). Robust solutions to Stackelberg games: Addressing bounded rationality and limited observations in human cognition. Artificial Intelligence, 174(15) 1142–1171.Google Scholar

Pita, J., Jain, M., Western, C., Portway, C., Tambe, M., Ordóñez, F., Kraus, S., & Parachuri, P. (2008). Deployed ARMOR protection: The application of a game-theoretic model for security at the Los Angeles International Airport. In Proceedings of the 7th International Conference on Autonomous Agents and Multiagent Systems (AAMAS) (pp. 125–132).Google Scholar

Pita, J., Tambe, M., Kiekintveld, C., Cullen, S., & Steigerwald, E. (2011). GUARDS – game theoretic security allocation on a national scale. In Proceedings of the 10th International Conference on Autonomous Agents and Multiagent Systems (AAMAS) (pp. 37–44).Google Scholar

Qian, Y., Haskell, W. B., Jiang, A. X., & Tambe, M. (2014). Online planning for optimal protector strategies in resource conservation games. In Proceedings of the 2014 International Conference on Autonomous Agents and Multiagent Systems (pp. 733–740).Google Scholar

Shieh, E., An, B., Yang, R., Tambe, M., Baldwin, C., DiRenzo, J., Maule, B., & Meyer, G. (2012). PROTECT: An application of computational game theory for the security of the ports of the United States. In Proceedings of the 26th AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence (AAAI) (pp. 2173–2179).Google Scholar

Short, M. B., D’Orsogna, M. R., Pasour, V. B., Tita, G. E., Brantingham, P. J., Bertozzi, A. L., & Chayes, L. B. (2008). A statistical model of criminal behavior. Mathematical Models and Methods in Applied Sciences, 18, 1249–1267.Google Scholar

Tambe, M., & An, B. (2012). Game theory for security: A real-world challenge problem for multiagent systems and beyond. In Proceedings of the AAAI Spring Symposium on Game Theory for Security, Sustainability and Health (pp. 69–74).Google Scholar

Tsai, J., Rathi, S., Kiekintveld, C., Ordóñez, F., & Tambe, M. (2009). IRIS: A tool for strategic security allocation in transportation networks. In Proceedings of the 8th International Conference on Autonomous Agents and Multiagent Systems (AAMAS) (pp. 37–44).Google Scholar

Varakantham, P., Lau, H. C., & Yuan, Z. (2013). Scalable randomized patrolling for securing rapid transit networks. In Conference on Innovative Applications of Artificial Intelligence (IAAI) (pp. 1563–1568).Google Scholar

von Stengel, B., & Zamir, S. (2004). Leadership with commitment to mixed strategies. Technical Report LSE-CDAM-2004-01, Centre for Discrete and Applicable Mathematics, London School of Economics and Political Science, London, UK.Google Scholar

Yang, R., Ford, B. J., Tambe, M., & Lemieux, A. (2014). Adaptive resource allocation for wildlife protection against illegal poachers. In Proceedings of the 11th International Conference on Autonomous Agents and Multiagent Systems (AAMAS) (pp. 453–460).Google Scholar

Yang, R., Jiang, A. X., Tambe, M., & Ordóñez, F. (2013). Scaling-up security games with boundedly rational adversaries: A cutting-plane approach. In Proceedings of the 22nd International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence (IJCAI) (pp. 404–410).Google Scholar

Yang, R., Kiekintveld, C., Ordóñez, F., Tambe, M., & John, R. (2011). Improving resource allocation strategy against human adversaries in security games. In Proceedings of the 22nd International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence (IJCAI) (pp. 458–464).Google Scholar

Yin, Y., An, B., & Jain, M. (2014). Game-theoretic resource allocation for protecting large public events. In Proceedings of the 28th Conference on Artificial Intelligence (AAAI) (pp. 826–834).Google Scholar

Yin, Y., Jain, M., Tambe, M., & Ordóñez, F. (2011). Risk-averse strategies for security games with execution and observational uncertainty. In Proceedings of the 25th AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence (AAAI) (pp. 758–763).Google Scholar

Yin, Y., Xu, H., Gan, J., An, B., & Jiang, A. (2015). Computing optimal mixed strategies for security games with dynamic payoffs. In Proceedings of the 24th International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence (IJCAI) (pp. 681–688).Google Scholar

Yin, Z., Korzhyk, D., Kiekintveld, C., Conitzer, V., & Tambe, M (2010). Stackelberg vs. Nash in security games: interchangeability, equivalence, and uniqueness. In Proceedings of the 9th International Conference on Autonomous Agents and Multiagent Systems (AAMAS) (pp. 1139–1146).Google Scholar

Yin, Z., & Tambe, M. (2012). A unified method for handling discrete and continuous uncertainty in Bayesian Stackelberg games. In Proceedings of the 11th International Conference on Autonomous Agents and Multiagent Systems (AAMAS) (pp. 855–862).Google Scholar

Zhang, C., Jiang, A. X., Short, M. B., Brantingham, P. J., & Tambe, M. (2014). Defending against opportunistic criminals: new game-theoretic frameworks and algorithms. In Decision and game theory for security (pp. 3–22). Springer.Google Scholar