Baker, G. H. (2005). A vulnerability assessment methodology for critical infrastructure sites. In DHS symposium: R and D partnerships in homeland security.Google Scholar

Berejikian, J. (2002). A cognitive theory of deterrence. Journal of Peace Research, 39, 165–183.Google Scholar

Bier, V. M. (2007). Choosing what to protect. Risk Analysis, 27(3), 607–620.Google Scholar

Bier, V. M., Cox, J. L. A., & Azaiez, M. N. (2009). Why both game theory and reliability theory are important in defending infrastructure against intelligent attacks. In Game theoretic risk analysis and security threats, vol. 128. Springer US.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bier, V. M., Haphuriwat, N., Menoyo, J., Zimmerman, R., & Culpen, A. M. (2008). Optimal resource allocation for defense of targets based on differing measures of attractiveness. Risk Analysis, 28(3), 763–770.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Bland, M. J., & Kerry, S. M. (1998). Weighted comparison of means. BMJ: British Medical Journal, 316, 125–129.Google Scholar

Blundell, R., & Costa-Dias, M. (2009). Alternative approaches to evaluation in empirical microeconomics. Journal of Human Resources.Google Scholar

Conitzer, V., & Sandholm, T. (2006). Computing the optimal strategy to commit to. In Proceedings of EC.Google Scholar

Cox, J. L. A. (2008). Some limitations of “risk = threat x vulnerability x consequence” for risk analysis of terrorist attacks. Risk Analysis, 28(6), 1749–1761.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Cruz, F. S. (2009, August 20). Personal communication.Google Scholar

Doane, C., & DiRezno, III, J. (2012). The port resilience operational/tactical enforcement to combat terrorism model. Coast Guard Outlook 2012 Summer Edition.Google Scholar

Edmunds, T., & Wheeler, R. (2009). Setting priorities. In Maurer, S. M. (Ed.), WMD terrorism (chapter 7, pp. 191–209). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar

Erev, I., Roth, A. E., Slonim, R. L., & Barron, G. (2002). Predictive value and usefulness of game theoretic models. International Journal of Forecasting, 18(3), 359–368.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Fave, F. M. D., Brown, M., Shieh, E., Zhang, C., Jiang, A. X., Rosoff, H., Tambe, M., & Sullivan, J. P. (2014). Security games in the field: Deployments on a transit system. Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence (LNAI).Google Scholar

Fave, F. M. D., Jiang, A. X., Yin, Z., Zhang, C., Tambe, M., Kraus, S., & Sullivan, J. (2014). Game-theoretic security patrolling with dynamic execution uncertainty and a case study on a real transit system. Journal of Artificial Intelligence Research, 50, 321–367.Google Scholar

Gerson, M., & Boyars, J. (2007). The future of U.S. deterrence: Constructing effective strategies to deter state and non-state actors. www.cna.org/documents/D0017171.A2.pdf.Google Scholar

Goldberg, L. R., Kercheval, A. N., & Lee, K. (2005). T-statistics for weighted means in credit risk modeling. Journal of Risk Finance, 6(4), 349–365.Google Scholar

Jacobson, S. H., Karnai, T., & Kobza, J. E. (2005). Assessing the impact of deterrence on aviation checked baggage screening strategies. International Journal of Risk Assessment and Management, 5(1), 1–15.Google Scholar

Jiang, A. X., Yin, Z., Zhang, C., Tambe, M., & Kraus, S. (2013). Game-theoretic randomization for security patrolling with dynamic execution uncertainty. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Autonomous Agents and Multiagent Systems (AAMAS).Google Scholar

Jose, V. R. R., & Zhuang, J. (2013). Technology adoption, accumulation, and competition in multi-period attacker-defender games. Military Operations Research, 18(2), 33–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kearns, M., & Ortiz, L. E. (2003). Algorithms for interdependent security games. In Neural information processing systems (NIPS).Google Scholar

Kiekintveld, C., Jain, M., Tsai, J., Pita, J., Ordóñez, F., & Tambe, M. (2009). Computing optimal randomized resource allocations for massive security games. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Autonomous Agents and Multiagent Systems (AAMAS).Google Scholar

Kiekintveld, C., Marecki, J., & Tambe, M. (2011). Approximation methods for infinite Bayesian Stackelberg games: Modeling distributional payoff uncertainty. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Autonomous Agents and Multiagent Systems (AAMAS).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kiekintveld, C., & Wellman, M. (2008). Selecting strategies using empirical game models: An experimental analysis of meta-strategies. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Autonomous Agents and Multiagent Systems (AAMAS).Google Scholar

Kou, Y., Lu, C., Sinvongwattana, S., &Huang, Y. (2004). Survey of fraud detection techniques. In Proceedings of IEEE Networking.Google Scholar

Lazarick, R. (1999). Airport vulnerability assessment – a methodology evaluation. In Proceedings of 33rd IEEE International Carnahan Conference on Security Technology.Google Scholar

McKelvey, R. D., & Palfrey, T. R. (1995). Quantal response equilibria for normal form games. Games and Economic Behavior, 10(1), 6–38.Google Scholar

Murr, , A. (2007, September). Random checks. In Newsweek National News. www.newsweek.com/id/43401.Google Scholar

Paruchuri, P., Pearce, J. P., Marecki, J., Tambe, M., Ordóñez, F., & Kraus, S. (2008). Playing games with security: An efficient exact algorithm for Bayesian Stackelberg games. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Autonomous Agents and Multiagent Systems (AAMAS).Google Scholar

Pita, J., Jain, M., Tambe, M., Ordóñez, F., Kraus, S., & Magori-Cohen, R. (2009). Effective solutions for real-world Stackelberg games: When agents must deal with human uncertainties. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Autonomous Agents and Multiagent Systems (AAMAS).Google Scholar

Pita, J., Jain, M., Western, C., Portway, C., Tambe, M., Ordóñez, F., Kraus, S., & Paruchuri, P. (2008). Deployed ARMOR protection: The application of a game theoretic model for security at the Los Angeles International Airport. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Autonomous Agents and Multiagent Systems (AAMAS).Google Scholar

Rogers, B. W., Palfrey, T. R., & Camerer., C. F. (2009). Heterogeneous quantal response equilibrium and cognitive hierarchies. Journal of Economic Theory, 144, 1440–1467.Google Scholar

Scerri, P., Goten, T. V., Fudge, J., Owens, S., & Sycara, K. (2008). Transitioning multiagent technology to UAV applications. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Autonomous Agents and Multiagent Systems (AAMAS) (Industry Track).Google Scholar

Shan, X., & Zhuang, J. (2013). Hybrid defensive resource allocations in the face of partially strategic attackers in a sequential defender-attacker game. European Journal of Operational Research, 228(1), 262–272.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Shieh, E., An, B., Yang, R., Tambe, M., Baldwin, C., DiRenzo, J., Maule, B., & Meyer, G. (2012). PROTECT: A deployed game theoretic system to protect the ports of the United States. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Autonomous Agents and Multiagent Systems (AAMAS).Google Scholar

Stevens, D., Hamilton, T., Schaffer, M., Dunham-Scott, D. Medby, J. J., Chan, E. W., Gibson, J., Eisman, M., Mesic, R., Kelly, C. T., Kim, J., LaTourrette, T., & Riley, K. J. (2009). Implementing security improvement options at Los Angeles International Airport. www.rand.org/pubs/documented_briefings/2006/RAND_DB499-1.pdf.Google Scholar

Taquechel, E. F. (2010, March). Validation of rational deterrence theory: Analysis of U.S. government and adversary risk propensity and relative emphasis on gain or loss. Master’s thesis, Naval Postgraduate School.Google Scholar

Tengs, T. O., & Graham, J. D. (1996). Risks, costs, and lives saved: Getting better results from regulation. In The opportunity costs of haphazard social investments in lifesaving. Washington, DC: American Enterprise Institute.Google Scholar

Tsai, J., Rathi, S., Kiekintveld, C., Ordóñez, F., & Tambe, M. (2009). IRIS: Tools for strategic security allocation in transportation networks. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Autonomous Agents and Multiagent Systems (AAMAS) (Industry Track).Google Scholar

T. U. S. G. A. O. GAO. (2009, January). Aviation security: Federal air marshal service has taken actions to fulfill its core mission and address workforce issues, but additional actions are needed to improve workforce survey. GAO-09-273.Google Scholar

Weibull, J. (2004). Testing game theory. In Huck, S. (Ed.), Advances in understanding strategic behavior: Game theory, experiments and bounded rationality (pp. 85–104). Palgrave MacMillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Yang, R., Kiekintveld, C., Ordóñez, F., Tambe, M., & John, R. (2011). Improving resource allocation strategy against human adversaries in security games. In Proceedings of the 22nd International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence (IJCAI) (pp. 458–464).Google Scholar

Yang, R., Tambe, M., & Ordóñez, F. (2012). Computing optimal strategy against quantal response in security games. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Autonomous Agents and Multiagent Systems (AAMAS).Google Scholar

Yin, Z., & Tambe, M. (2012). A unified method for handling discrete and continuous uncertainty in Bayesian Stackelberg games. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Autonomous Agents and Multiagent Systems (AAMAS).Google Scholar