Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-7cvxr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-23T09:25:20.573Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

36 - The UK

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 November 2014

Michael Lang
Affiliation:
Wirtschaftsuniversitat Wien, Austria
Pasquale Pistone
Affiliation:
Wirtschaftsuniversitat Wien, Austria
Josef Schuch
Affiliation:
Wirtschaftsuniversitat Wien, Austria
Claus Staringer
Affiliation:
Wirtschaftsuniversitat Wien, Austria
Get access

Summary

The relevance of the OECD and UN Model Conventions and their Commentaries for the interpretation of UK tax treaties

The view from the UK

Since the publication by the OECD Fiscal Committee of its Draft Double Taxation Convention in 1963 and its Model Convention in 1977, all tax treaties concluded by the UK have been based on that draft and its successors, with appropriate variations to cater for UK preferences and to take into account, where necessary, the differing economic circumstances, and tax and legal systems, of the two contracting states. The UK was a founding Member country of the OECD and has regularly provided chairmen both of the Committee on Fiscal Affairs and of its Working Party No. 1. Over the years it has taken a leading part in the consideration of the changes that have been made to the text of both the Model and its Commentaries.

It is therefore not surprising that the official position of the UK is that, where the text of a provision of a bilateral treaty follows the wording of a provision in the OECD Model, the Commentary on the provision in the OECD Model may be used as an aid to the interpretation of the treaty provision, whether the Commentary on the Model provision was written before or after the date of the treaty provision in question. The positions of the courts and of scholarly writers in the UK, however, have not always been so clear and the legal basis for referring to the Commentaries, and in particular the question whether reference may properly be made to a Commentary later in date than the provision of a bilateral treaty, will accordingly be discussed later in this chapter.

Type
Chapter
Information
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2012

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Cleave, B‘Judicial Interpretation of Tax Treaties – Educating the Judges?’Bombay Chartered Accountants Journal 2 2005 129Google Scholar
Avery Jones, J. F.‘The Interpretation of Tax Treaties with Particular Reference to Article 3(2)of the OECD Model’British Tax Review 1984 90Google Scholar
Baker, PDouble Taxation Conventions and International Tax LawLondonSweet & Maxwell 1991Google Scholar
Baker, PDouble Taxation Conventions and International Tax LawLondonSweet & Maxwell 1994Google Scholar
Baker, PDouble Taxation ConventionsrdLondonSweet & Maxwell 2001 1Google Scholar
Avery Jones, J. F‘The Binding Nature of the OECD Commentaries from the UK Point of View’Douma, SEngelen, FThe Legal Status of the OECD CommentariesAmsterdamIBFD 2008 157Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure [email protected] is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

  • The UK
  • Edited by Michael Lang, Wirtschaftsuniversitat Wien, Austria, Pasquale Pistone, Wirtschaftsuniversitat Wien, Austria, Josef Schuch, Wirtschaftsuniversitat Wien, Austria, Claus Staringer, Wirtschaftsuniversitat Wien, Austria
  • Book: The Impact of the OECD and UN Model Conventions on Bilateral Tax Treaties
  • Online publication: 05 November 2014
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139095686.038
Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

  • The UK
  • Edited by Michael Lang, Wirtschaftsuniversitat Wien, Austria, Pasquale Pistone, Wirtschaftsuniversitat Wien, Austria, Josef Schuch, Wirtschaftsuniversitat Wien, Austria, Claus Staringer, Wirtschaftsuniversitat Wien, Austria
  • Book: The Impact of the OECD and UN Model Conventions on Bilateral Tax Treaties
  • Online publication: 05 November 2014
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139095686.038
Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

  • The UK
  • Edited by Michael Lang, Wirtschaftsuniversitat Wien, Austria, Pasquale Pistone, Wirtschaftsuniversitat Wien, Austria, Josef Schuch, Wirtschaftsuniversitat Wien, Austria, Claus Staringer, Wirtschaftsuniversitat Wien, Austria
  • Book: The Impact of the OECD and UN Model Conventions on Bilateral Tax Treaties
  • Online publication: 05 November 2014
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139095686.038
Available formats
×