Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-p9bg8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-27T15:47:16.392Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

10 - Life, intelligence, and the pursuit of value in cosmic evolution

from Part III - Philosophical, theological, and moral impact: How do we comprehend the cultural challenges raised by discovery?

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 November 2015

Mark Lupisella
Affiliation:
NASA Goddard Space Flight Center
Steven J. Dick
Affiliation:
Library of Congress, Washington DC
Get access

Summary

As life and intelligence continue to evolve in the universe, it is reasonable to wonder where it all may lead, and what, if anything, it may mean. Such contemplations have consumed, befuddled, and perhaps even harmed humanity since we were first able to entertain such matters. From philosophy to science, from religion to spirituality, we have wondered about some larger meaning or purpose, some possible direction for life and intelligence. This is almost always discussed in the context of a broader “objective” external reality to help provide a compelling frame of reference for explaining and navigating the bewildering complexities of human life. Contemplating potential implications or roles for life and intelligence in cosmic evolution should be seen in this larger experiential, emotional, and intellectual context, recognizing that discerning patterns, trends, and theories in cultural change is a tricky business (Denning 2009).

Cosmic contemplations for life and intelligence are subject to wide-ranging speculation and perhaps a certain level of hubris, and hence are justifiably susceptible to deep skepticism and harsh criticism. But in trying to explore more thoroughly the potential futures of humanity and other beings in the universe, it seems reasonable to consider at least a few lines of thinking that place future evolutionary trajectories of life and intelligence in a long-term cosmic context. Ancient religions as well as more contemporary religous and spiritual movements have much to say about life and intelligence in a universal context. Science also has much to say about the past evolution of life and intelligence in a cosmic context, and perhaps even a bit to say about the long-term future. Careful philosophical considerations can leverage the science we understand today, and the best of philosophical thinking, to explore potential sources of meaning and purpose, and articulate some rough themes for the future of life and intelligence in the universe.

This breadth of thought that places life and intelligence in a cosmic context ranges from western and eastern religious worldviews such as Hinduism, to natural theology and Western philosophers such as Plato, Giordano Bruno, and Baruch Spinoza. Alfred North Whitehead's process philosophy (1929), Teilhard de Chardin's Omega Point Theory (1955), and Arthur O. Lovejoy's treatment of the principle of plenitude (1936) are all part of this tradition.

Type
Chapter
Information
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2015

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Blackmore, S. 2009. “Dangerous Memes; or What the Pandorans Let Loose.” In Dick, S. J. and Lupisella, M. (eds.) Cosmos and Culture: Cultural Evolution in a Cosmic Context. Washington, DC: NASA, pp. 297–318.Google Scholar
Chaisson, E. 2005. Epic of Evolution: Seven Ages of the Cosmos. New York, NY: Columbia University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cockell, C., ed. 2015. The Meaning of Liberty Beyond Earth. New York, NY: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cohen, J. and Stewart, I.. 2002. Evolving the Alien. London: Ebury Press/Random House.Google Scholar
Crutzen, P. J. 2002. “Geology of Mankind.” Nature, 415, p. 23.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Davies, P. 2009. “Life, Mind, and Culture as Fundamental Properties of the Universe.” In Dick, S. J. and Lupisella, M. (eds.) Cosmos and Culture: Cultural Evolution in a Cosmic Context. Washington, DC: NASA, pp. 383–397.Google Scholar
Dawkins, R. 1989. The Selfish Gene, edn. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Deacon, T. W. 1997. The Symbolic Species: The Co-Evolution of Language and the Brain. New York, NY: W. W. Norton.Google Scholar
De Duve, C. 1995. Vital Dust: Life as a Cosmic Imperative. New York, NY: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Dennett, D. 1995. Darwin's Dangerous Idea. London: Penguin.Google Scholar
Dennett, D. 2009. “The Evolution of Culture.” In Dick, S. J. and Lupisella, M. (eds.) Cosmos and Culture: Cultural Evolution in a Cosmic Context. Washington, DC: NASA, pp. 125–143.Google Scholar
Denning, K. 2009. “Social Evolution.” In Dick, S. J. and Lupisella, M. (eds.) Cosmos and Culture: Cultural Evolution in a Cosmic Context. Washington, DC: NASA History Series, pp. 63–124.Google Scholar
Deutsch, D. 2011. The Beginning of Infinity: Explanations that Transform the World. New York, NY: Viking.Google Scholar
Dick, S. J. 1996. The Biological Universe: The Twentieth Century Extraterrestrial Life Debate and the Limits of Science. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Dick, S. J. 2000. “Cosmotheology: Theological Implications of the New Universe.” In Dick, S. J. (ed.) Many Worlds: The New Universe, Extraterrestrial Life, and the Theological Implications. Philadelphia, PN: Templeton Foundation Press, pp. 191–210.Google Scholar
Dick, S. J. 2003. “Cultural Evolution, the Postbiological Universe and SETI,” International Journal of Astrobiology, 2: 65–74, reprinted as “Bringing Culture to Cosmos: The Postbiological Universe,” in S. J. Dick and M. Lupisella (eds.) Cosmos and Culture: Cultural Evolution in a Cosmic Context. Washington, DC: NASA, pp. 463–487.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dyson, F. J. 1979. “Time Without End: Physics and Biology in an Open Universe.” Reviews of Modern Physics, 51, No. 3.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gardner, J. 2009. “The Intelligent Universe.” In Dick, S. J. and Lupisella, M. (eds.) Cosmos and Culture: Cultural Evolution in a Cosmic Context. Washington, DC: NASA History Series.Google Scholar
Guth, A. 1994. “Do the Laws of Physics Allow Us to Create a New Universe?” In Ekspong, G. (ed.) The Oskar Klein Memorial Lectures. Stockholm: World Scientific Publishing, vol. 2, pp. 71–95.Google Scholar
Haidt, J. 2012. The Righteous Mind. New York, NY: Random.Google Scholar
Harris, S. 2010. The Moral Landscape: How Science Can Determine Human Values. New York, NY: Free Press.Google Scholar
Hillis, D. 1991. “Co-evolving Parasites Improve Simulated Evolution as an Optimization Procedure.” In Langton, C., Taylor, C., Farmer, J., and Rasmussen, S. (eds.) Artificial Life II, (Santa Fe Institute Studies in the Sciences of Complexity, Proceedings, 10), Redwood City, CA: Addison-Wesley, pp. 313–324.Google Scholar
Kant, I. 1785. Groundwork of the Metaphysics of Morals. Trans. Gregor, M., 2003. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Kardashev, Nikolai. 1964. “Transmission of Information by Extraterrestrial Civilizations.” Soviet Astronomy (PDF) 8: 217.Google Scholar
Lovejoy, Arthur Oncken. 1971 [1936]. The Great Chain of Being. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Lupisella, M. 2001. Participant statement in Humanity 3000, Seminar No. 3 Proceedings, 37. Bellevue, WA: Foundation for the Future, pp. 37–38 and also discussed on p. 251 and p. 330. http://www.futurefoundation.org/documents/hum_pro_sem3.pdf.Google Scholar
Lupisella, Mark. 2004. “Using Artificial Life to Assess the Typicality of Terrestrial Life.” Advances in Space Research 33:1318–1324.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lupisella, Mark. 2009a. “Cosmocultural Evolution: The Coevolution of Cosmos and Culture and the Creation of Cosmic Value.” In Dick, S. J. and Lupisella, M. L. (eds.) Cosmos and Culture: Cultural Evolution in a Cosmic Context, NASA, pp. 321–359.Google Scholar
Lupisella, M. 2009b. “The Search for Extraterrestrial Life: Epistemology, Ethics, and Worldviews.” In Bertka, C. (ed.) Exploring the Origin, Extent, and Future of Life: Philosophical, Ethical and Theological Perspectives. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 186–204.Google Scholar
Lupisella, Mark. 2013. “Caring Capacity and Cosmocultural Evolution: Potential Mechanisms for Advanced Altruism.” In Vakoch, D. A. (ed.) Extraterrestrial Altruism. Berlin: Springer-Verlag.Google Scholar
Lupisella, M. and Logsdon, J.. 1997. “Do We Need a Cosmocentric Ethic?” Paper IAA-97-IAA.9.2.09, presented at the 48th International Astronautical Congress, Turin, Italy, October 6–10.
McKay, C. 1990. “Does Mars Have Rights?” In MacNiven, D. (ed.) Moral Expertise. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Michaud, M. A. G. 2007. Contact with Alien Civilizations: Our Hopes and Fears about Encountering Extraterrestrials. New York, NY: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Putnam, H. 2002. The Collapse of the Fact/Value Dichotomy and Other Essays. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Rawls, J. 1971. A Theory of Justice. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Rolston, H. 1990. “The Preservation of Natural Value in the Solar System.” In Hargrove, E. C. (ed.) Beyond Spaceship Earth: Environmental Ethics and the Solar System. San Francisco, CA: Sierra Club Books.Google Scholar
Shermer, M. 2004. The Science of Good and Evil. New York, NY: Times Books/Henry Holt & Company.Google Scholar
Skoyles, J. R. and Sagan, D.. 2002. Up From Dragons: The Evolution of Human Intelligence. New York, NY: McGraw Hill.Google Scholar
Smart, J. 2009. “Evo Devo Universe? A Framework for Speculations on Cosmic Culture.” In Dick, S. J. and Lupisella, M. (eds.) Cosmos and Culture: Cultural Evolution in a Cosmic Context. Washington, DC: NASA, pp. 201–295.Google Scholar
Smith, K. C. 2009. “The Trouble with Intrinsic Value: An Ethical Primer for Astrobiology.” In Bertka, C. (ed.) Exploring the Origin, Extent, and Future of Life: Philosophical, Ethical, and Theological Perspectives. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 261–280.Google Scholar
Smith, K. C. 2014. “Manifest Complexity: A Foundational Ethic for Astrobiology?Space Policy, 30: 209–214.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sowell, T. 2007. A Conflict of Visions: Ideological Origins of Political Struggles. New York, NY: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Stapledon, O. 1937. Star Maker. London: Methuen Publishing.Google Scholar
Teilhard De Chardin, P. 1955. The Phenomenon of Man. Originally published as Le Phénomène Humain. Editions du Seuil, Paris. Translated by Wall, B.. New York, NY: Harper & Row, 1959.Google Scholar
Tipler, F. 1994. The Physics of Immortality. New York, NY: Doubleday.Google Scholar
Vakoch, D. 2009. “Encoding Our Origins: Communicating the Evolutionary Epic in Interstellar Messages.” In Dick, S. J. and Lupisella, M. L. (eds.) Cosmos and Culture: Cultural Evolution in a Cosmic Context. Washington, DC: NASA, pp. 415–439.Google Scholar
Vidal, C. 2014. The Beginning and the End: The Meaning of Life in a Cosmological Perspective. New York: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ward, P. D. and Brownlee, D.. 2000. Rare Earth: Why Complex Life is Uncommon in the Universe. New York, NY: Copernicus Books.Google Scholar
Whitehead, A. N. 1929. Process and Reality: An Essay in Cosmology. New York: Macmillan. Edition 1978 by Griffin, D. R. and Sherbourne, D. W., New York: Macmillan.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure [email protected] is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×