We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.
We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.
from Part II - Transcending anthropocentrism: How do we move beyond our own preconceptions of life, intelligence, and culture?
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 05 November 2015
If the search for extraterrestrial intelligence (SETI) detects an artificial signal from a distant civilization, our next challenge will be to understand any encoded message, and then to decide what we may want to transmit in reply. The few intentional messages humans have sent into space thus far reflect the assumption that mathematics and science are universal. Any civilization able to build technology capable of interstellar communication must certainly know at least the basics of these areas, it is often argued. How accurate is this Platonic notion that our math and physics tap into universal principles? Might different civilizations have their own versions of math and science that are perfectly adequate for explaining the universe, but that do not directly map onto our notions?
Lingua Cosmica
In the standard approach to constructing interstellar messages that may be comprehensible to an independently evolved intelligence, we start with concepts presumably shared by sender and recipient. If the goal of interstellar communication is to share information not previously known by the recipient, the sender has the additional challenge of identifying a sequence that will lead from shared to unique information. For example, logician Hans Freudenthal began his interstellar language Lingua Cosmica, or Lincos, with an exposition of mathematical concepts (Freudenthal 1960). He then moved to a discussion of time; then human behavior; and finally notions of space, motion, and mass. In the process, he attempted to convey some of the idiosyncrasies of human life in terms of potentially universal principles of mathematics and science.
A recurrent critique of Lincos is that ambiguities at one point in the exposition may make subsequent sections unintelligible. In this chapter, I examine the potential problems raised by Freudenthal's reliance on concepts related to infinity early in his message, and propose an alternative approach that introduces notions of three-dimensional (3D) space and motion as a foundation for discussing human behavior, with the goal of enhancing intelligibility.
To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure [email protected] is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.
Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.
Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.
To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.
To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.
