Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-94fs2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-09T08:03:33.777Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

2 - Locality

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  25 November 2020

Get access

Summary

In imperfect but confident English, T.G. Rinpoche explained to me how the Monpas were being side-lined as a ‘tribal community’. He claimed the Monpa are a very ancient community, originally spread across Nepal, Ladakh, Sikkim, Bhutan, and Mechuka in Arunachal Pradesh, but now confined only to those groups in Tawang and West Kameng. ‘Religion se hi civilization hoti hain’ [civilization begins from religion], he stated, concluding that if autonomy were granted the Monpas would be better able to maintain their identity and Tibetan Buddhist culture. This conversation took place during our first meeting on 19 June 2008. What intrigued me then was the use of the term ‘Mon’ instead of ‘Monpa’ as the label for the Mon autonomy movement. When asked, Rinpoche was quick to respond, in English, ‘“Mon” means area… “Monpa” becomes too narrow. Once you are inside Mon, you become part of it. It is territory that gives the people an identity.’

Like Rinpoche, in discussions of the demand for autonomy the office-bearers of the movement tended to suppress reference to ‘Monpa’ in favour of ‘Mon’ – the latter term supposedly more inclusive since it indicates a physical territory, Monyul, rather than a particular ethnic group or culture. Official documents and statements by leaders of the Mon Autonomous Region Demand Committee (MARDC) also refrain from using the idiom of ethnicity in describing the boundaries of the autonomous region, instead making appeals to a territorial area in which all ethnic groups of the region are equal stakeholders (Constitution of Mon Autonomous Council 2005).

This territorial (‘Mon’) rather than ethnic (‘Monpa’) nomenclature promises equal participation in the autonomy scheme to the non-Monpa ethnic groups residing in Monyul. The territorial categorization can unite people around issues of a political and economic nature such as uneven power structures, livelihood and employment opportunities, and the allocation of resources and infrastructure, while using the ethnic term may create exclusivist identities. Yet, ‘Mon’ does not consistently refer to current West Kameng and Tawang: its older connotation, to which Rinpoche and other supporters alluded, refers to an extensive geographical area spanning several regions on the Indo-Tibetan borderland. In this instance, the territorial boundaries of the local unravel as sub-texts of translocal geography unfold within the discourse of the demand for autonomy. Even the meaning of locality is never stable, for different individuals and groups define it in different ways.

Type
Chapter
Information
Imagined Geographies in the Indo-Tibetan Borderlands
Culture, Politics, Place
, pp. 67 - 106
Publisher: Amsterdam University Press
Print publication year: 2020

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure [email protected] is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

  • Locality
  • Swargajyoti Gohain
  • Book: Imagined Geographies in the Indo-Tibetan Borderlands
  • Online publication: 25 November 2020
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9789048541881.003
Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

  • Locality
  • Swargajyoti Gohain
  • Book: Imagined Geographies in the Indo-Tibetan Borderlands
  • Online publication: 25 November 2020
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9789048541881.003
Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

  • Locality
  • Swargajyoti Gohain
  • Book: Imagined Geographies in the Indo-Tibetan Borderlands
  • Online publication: 25 November 2020
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9789048541881.003
Available formats
×