Part II - IMAGINATION AND UTILITY
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 22 September 2009
Summary
When deliberating on the meaning of good and evil in the middle of his Enquiry Concerning Political Justice, William Godwin confidently announces that it ‘is not difficult to form a scale of happiness’. His philosophy of social utility is based, as his equally confident account of the abolition of the slave trade makes clear, on the notion of a shared human nature conceived in positive, perfectibilist terms. The scale of happiness Godwin then goes on to image is thus premised on improvement, on the hope of advancing up the scale. Not for him a dangerously simplistic appeal to the ‘rights of man’ which can only ‘reduce all to a naked and savage equality’.
In a series of cameos, Godwin provides a portrait of the hierarchical structure of English society (familiar to readers of his novel Caleb Williams) which incorporates one of the ‘labouring inhabitants of the civilized states of Europe’, one of ‘the men of rank, fortune, and dissipation’, the ‘man of taste and liberal accomplishments’, and, finally, the ‘man of benevolence’. For our purposes, the scale is at its most interesting when it moves to consider ‘the man of taste and liberal accomplishments’. This is the point at which we are given a clear indication of the role of the arts and the aesthetic in Godwin's vision of society:
The beauties of nature are all his own. He admires the overhanging cliff, the wide-extended prospect, the vast expanse of the ocean, the foliage of the woods, the sloping lawn and the waving grass. He knows the pleasures of solitude, when man holds commerce alone with the tranquil solemnity of nature. He has traced the structure of the universe; the substances which compose the globe we inhabit, and are the materials of human industry; and the laws which hold the planets in their course amidst the trackless fields of space. He studies; and has experienced the pleasures which result from conscious perspicacity and discovered truth. He enters, with a true relish, into the sublime and the pathetic. He partakes in all the grandeur and enthusiasm of poetry. He is perhaps himself a poet. He is conscious that he has not lived in vain, and that he shall be recollected with pleasure, and extolled with ardour, by generations yet unborn. In this person, compared with the two preceding classes, we acknowledge something of the features of a man. They were only a better sort of brutes; but he has sensations and transports of which they have no conception.
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- Imagination under Pressure, 1789–1832Aesthetics, Politics and Utility, pp. 98 - 109Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2000