Published online by Cambridge University Press: 09 December 2022
We have been tracing a contest of images within the United States that falls along racial, class, geographic, ideological, and party-political lines. Most of the time, these social divisions remain multiplicitous, not quite coalescing into the kind of generalized partisan divides and armed conflict that characterize full-scale civil war. Yet, the media campaigns orchestrated around Donald Trump, and the protests following the circulation of the video of George Floyd's murder, highlighted contrasting aspects of what might be called the cultural phase of such a war. So did January 6, 2021, when considered as a peak action within a concerted campaign by supporters of Trumpism determined to “Stop the Steal.” In both cases, mass media events were staged with the intent of effecting direct political change. In the United States and everywhere else during recent decades, the game has changed. The iconomy has become intensely politicized. And politics has become intensely iconomic.
Control of the circulation of images has always been important in any struggle for political advantage. Today, their saturation of most aspects everyday life means that they also occupy its extraordinary moments, those that connect us or threaten to abruptly disconnect us. We have been tracing the kinds of control over image circulation exercised by the social media companies, by governments of all kinds, by certain religions, by legal systems, and by dominant economic agendas, notably that of neoliberal capitalism and its recent centralized, statist variants. In the previous chapters, we also tracked the widespread emergence of strategies of contracirculation, and of engendering diversification, especially among activists who are building campaigns that resist these systems and envisage alternatives. This chapter will focus on the contribution to these strategies of artists, particularly Black artists, working with these widely circulating images to show why and how Black lives matter.
The “Political” Biennial
In New York in 1993, George Holliday's video of the beating of Rodney King was exhibited in the Whitney Biennial of that year as a work of art. Curator John G. Hanhardt saw it as such, as formally aligned with the examples of contemporary avant-garde and experimental video that he was showing in his section of the exhibition.
To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure [email protected] is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.
Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.
Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.
To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.
To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.