References

Lucy Suchman

doi:10.1017/CBO9780511808418.018

Aanestad, Margunn (2003). The camera as an actor: Design-in-use of Telemedicine Infrastructure in Surgery. Computer Supported Cooperative Work 12: 1–20.CrossRef Google Scholar

Adam, Alison (1998). Artificial knowing: Gender and the thinking machine. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar

Agre, Philip (1995). Conceptions of the user in computer systems design. In P. Thomas (ed.)., The social and interactional dimensions of human–computer interfaces (pp. 67–106). Cambridge, UK/New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Agre, Philip (1997). Computation and human experience. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRef Google Scholar

Agre, Philip, and Chapman, David (1987). Pengi: An implementation of a theory of activity. Proceedings of AAAI 87: 268–272.Google Scholar

Agre, Philip, and Chapman, David (1990). What are plans for? In Pattie Maes (ed.), Designing autonomous agents: Theory and practice from biology to engineering and back (pp. 17–34). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. (Original version: Philip E. Agre and David Chapman, What are plans for?, A. I. Memo 1050a, Artificial Intelligence Laboratory, MIT, 1989.)

Ahmed, Sara (1998). Differences that matter: Feminist theory and postmodernism. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.CrossRef Google Scholar

Ahmed, Sara (2000). Strange encounters: Embodied others in post-coloniality. London/New York: Routledge.Google Scholar

Ahmed, Sara, Kilby, Jane, Lury, Celia, McNeil, Maureen, and Skeggs, Beverly (2000). Transformations: Thinking through feminism. London/New York: Routledge.Google Scholar

Akrich, Madeleine (1992). The de-scription of technical objects. In W. Bijker and J. Law (eds.), Shaping technology/building society (pp. 205–224). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar

Allen, James (1983). Recognizing intentions from natural language utterances. In M. Brady and R. Berwick (eds.), Computational models of discourse (Chapter 2). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar

Allen, James (1984). Towards a general theory of action and time. Artificial Intelligence 23: 123–154.CrossRef Google Scholar

Amerine, Ronald, and Bilmes, Jack (1990). Following instructions. In M. Lynch and S. Woolgar (eds.), Representation in scientific practice (pp. 323–335). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar

Anderson, John, Boyle, C., and Reiser, B. (1985). Intelligent tutoring systems. Science 228: 456–462.CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Anscombe, George (1957). Intentions. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar

Appelt, Douglas (1985). Planning English referring expressions. Artificial Intelligence 26: 1–33.CrossRef Google Scholar

Ashmore, Malcolm, Wooffitt, Robin, and Harding, Stella (1994). Humans and others: The concept of ‘agency’ and its attribution. American Behavioral Scientist 37(6): 733–738.CrossRef Google Scholar

Atkinson, John, and Drew, Paul (1979). Order in court: The organization of verbal interaction in judicial settings. Atlantic Highlands, NJ: Humanities.CrossRef Google Scholar

Austin, John L. (1962). How to do things with words. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar

Balsamo, Anne (1996). Technologies of the gendered body: Reading cyborg women. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.Google Scholar

Balsamo, Anne (in press). Designing culture: A work of the technological imagination. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.CrossRef

Bannon, Liam (1991). From human factors to human actors: The role of psychology and human–computer interaction studies in system design. In J. Greenbaum and M. Kyng (eds.), Design at work: Cooperative design of computer systems (pp. 25–44). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar

Banta, Martha (1993). Taylored lives: Narrative productions in the age of Taylor, Veblen and Ford. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar

Barad, Karen (1996). Meeting the universe halfway: Ambiguities, discontinuities, quantum subjects, and multiple positionings in feminism and physics. In L. H. Nelson and J. Nelson (eds.), Feminism, science, and the philosophy of science: A dialog (pp. 161–194). Norwell, MA: Kluwer.Google Scholar

Barad, Karen (1998). Getting real: Technoscientific practices and the materialization of reality. Differences: A Journal of Feminist Cultural Studies 10: 88–128.Google Scholar

Barad, Karen (2003). Posthumanist performativity: Toward an understanding of how matter comes to matter. Signs: Journal of Women in Culture and Society 28: 801–831.CrossRef Google Scholar

Bardram, Jakob (1997). Plans as situated action: An activity theory approach to workflow systems. Proceedings of ECSCW 97, Lancaster, UK.Google Scholar

Barfield, Woodrow, and Caudell, Thomas (2000). Fundamentals of wearable computers and augumented reality. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar

Barley, Stephen (1986). Technology as an occasion for structuring: Evidence from observations of CT scanners and the social order of radiology departments. Administrative Science Quarterly 31: 78–108.CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Barley, Stephen, and Bechky, Beth (1993). In the back rooms of science: The work of technicians in science labs. Work and Occupations 21: 85–126.CrossRef Google Scholar

Barley, Stephen, and Orr, Julian (eds.). (1997). Between craft and science: Technical work in U.S. settings. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar

Barwise, Jon, and Perry, John (1985). Situations and attitudes. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar

Bates, Elizabeth (1976). Language and context: The acquisition of pragmatics. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar

Bates, Joseph (1994). The role of emotion in believable agents. Communications of the ACM 37: 122–125.CrossRef Google Scholar

Beck, Eevi (1995). Changing documents/documenting changes: Using computers for collaborative writing over a distance. In S. Leigh Star (ed.), Cultures of computing (pp. 53–68). Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar

Beckman, Howard, and Frankel, Richard (1983). Who hides the agenda: The impact of physician behavior on the collection of data. Paper presented at the Fourth Annual SREPCIM Task Force on Interviewing, Washington, DC.Google Scholar

Beninger, James (1986). The control revolution: Technological and economic origins of the information society. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar

Berg, Anna Jorunn (1994). A gendered socio-technical construction: The smart house. In D. Mackenzie and J. Wajcman (eds.), The social shaping of technology (pp. 301–313). Milton Keynes: Open University Press.Google Scholar

Berg, Marc (1997). Rationalizing medical work decision-support techniques and medical practices. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar

Berg, Marc, and Timmermans, Stefan (2000). Order and their others: On the constitution of universalities in medical work. Configurations 8 (1): 31–61.

Berners-Lee, Tim, Hendler, James, and Lassila, Ora (2001). The Semantic Web. Scientific American, May: 36–43.

Berreman, Gerald (1966). Anemic and emetic analyses in social anthropology. American Anthropologist 68(2): 346–354.CrossRef Google Scholar

Bhabha, Homi (1994). The location of culture. London: Routledge.Google Scholar

Birdwhistell, Raymond (1970). Kinesics and context: Essays on body motion communication. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.Google Scholar

Bjerknes, Gro, Ehn, Pelle, and Kyng, Morten (eds.). (1987). Computers and democracy: A Scandinavian challenge. Aldershot, UK: Avebury.Google Scholar

Bleecker, Julian (1995). Urban crisis: Past, present and virtual. Socialist Review 24(1–2): 189–221.Google Scholar

Blomberg, Jeanette, Suchman, Lucy, and Trigg, Randall (1996). Reflections on a work-oriented design project. Human–Computer Interaction 11: 237–265.CrossRef Google Scholar

Bloomfield, Brian (1991). The role of information systems in the UK National Health Service: Action at a distance and the fetish of calculation. Social Studies of Science 21: 701–734.CrossRef Google Scholar

Blumer, Herbert (1969). Symbolic interactionism. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.Google Scholar

Bobrow, Daniel, Kaplan, Ron, Kay, Martin, Norman, Donald, Thompson, Henry, and Winograd, Terry (1977). GUS: A frame-driven dialogue system. Artificial Intelligence 8: 155–173.CrossRef Google Scholar

Boden, Margaret (1973). The structure of intentions. Journal of Theory of Social Behavior 3: 23–46.CrossRef Google Scholar

Bødker, Susanne (1991). Through the interface: A human activity approach to user interface design. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar

Bowers, John (2002). Improvising machines: Ethnographically informed design for improvised electro-acoustic music. Norwich, UK, and Stockholm, Sweden: University of East Anglia and Royal Institute of Technology.Google Scholar

Bowers, John, Button, Graham, and Sharrock, Wes (1995). Workflow from within and without. In H. Marmolin, Y. Sundblad, and K. Schmidt (eds.), Fourth European Conference on Computer-Supported Cooperative Work (pp. 51–66) Dordrecht: The Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers.Google Scholar

Bowker, Geoffrey (1993). How to be universal: Some cybernetic strategies, 1943–1970. Social Studies of Science 23: 107–127.CrossRef Google Scholar

Bowker, Geoffrey, and Star, Susan Leigh (1999). Sorting things out: Classification and its consequences. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar

Brady, Michael, and Berwick, Robert (eds.) (1983). Computational models of discourse. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar

Braidotti, Rosi (1994). Nomadic subjects. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar

Braidotti, Rosi (2002). Metamorphoses: Towards a materialist theory of becoming. Cambridge, UK: Blackwell.Google Scholar

Brook, James, and Boal, Iain (eds.). (1995). Resisting the virtual life: The culture and politics of information. San Francisco: City Lights.Google Scholar

Brooks, Rodney (1999). Cambrian intelligence: The early history of the new AI. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar

Brooks, Rodney (2002). Flesh and machines: How robots will change us. New York: Pantheon Books.Google Scholar

Brooks, Rodney, and Steels, Luc (1995). The artificial life route to artificial intelligence: Building embodied, situated agents. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar

Brown, Barry, Green, Nicola, and Harper, Richard (eds.). (2001). Wireless world: Social and interactional implications of wireless technology. London: Springer-Verlag.Google Scholar

Brown, John Seely, and Newman, Susan (1985). Issues in cognitive and social ergonomics: From our house to Bauhaus. Human–Computer Interaction 1: 359–391.CrossRef Google Scholar

Brown, John Seely, Rubenstein, R., and Burton, R. (1976). Reactive learning environment for computer assisted electronics instruction. (BBN Report 3314). Cambridge, MA: Bolt Beranek and Newman, Inc.CrossRef Google Scholar

Bruce, Bertram (1981). Natural communication between person and computer. In W. Lehnert and M. Ringle (eds.), Strategies for natural language processing. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar

Bruner, Jerome (1986). Actual minds, possible worlds. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar

Burke, Julie (1982). An analysis of intelligibility and practical activity. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign.

Burton, Richard, and Brown, John Seely (1982). An investigation of computer coaching for informal learning activities. In D. Sleeman and J. S. Brown (eds.), Intelligent tutoring systems (pp. 79–98). London: Academic Press.Google Scholar

Butler, Judith (1993). Bodies that matter: On the discursive limits of “sex.”New York: Routledge.Google Scholar

Button, Graham (1990). Going up a blind alley: Conflating conversation analysis and computational modeling. In P. Luff, N. Gilbert, and D. Frolich (eds.), Computers and conversation (pp. 67–90). London: Academic Press.Google Scholar

Button, Graham (1993). Technology in working order: Studies of work, interaction, and technology. London/New York: Routledge.Google Scholar

Button, Graham, Coulter, Jeff, Lee, John R., and Sharrock, Wes (1995). Computers, minds, and conduct. Cambridge, UK: Polity Press.Google Scholar

Callon, Michel (1999). Actor-network theory: The market test. In J. Law and J. Hassard (eds.), Actor network theory and after (pp. 181–195). Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar

Cambrosio, Alberto, and Keating, Peter (1995). Exquisite specificity: The monoclonal antibody revolution. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Carbonell, Jaime (1971). Mixed-intiative man–computer dialogues. (Technical Report 1970). Cambridge, MA: Bolt Beranek and Newman, Inc.Google Scholar

Carey, Susan (1985). Conceptual change in childhood. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar

Carroll, John M. (2003). Situated action in the zeitgeist of human–computer interaction. The Journal of the Learning Sciences 12 (2): 273–278.CrossRef Google Scholar

Carroll, John M. (2000). Making use: Scenario-based design of human–computer interactions. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.CrossRef Google Scholar

Casper, Monica (1994). Reframing and grounding nonhuman agency: What makes a fetus an agent? American Behavioral Scientist 37: 839–856.CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Casper, Monica (1998). The making of the unborn patient: A social anatomy of fetal surgery. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press.Google Scholar

Cassell, Justine, Sullivan, Joseph, Prevost, Scott, and Churchill, Elizabeth (eds.). (1996). Embodied conversational agents. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar

Castañeda, Claudia (2001). Robotic skin: The future of touch? In S. Ahmed and J. Stacey (eds.), Thinking through the skin (pp. 223–236). London: Routledge.Google Scholar

Castañeda, Claudia (2002). Figurations: Child, bodies, worlds. Durham, NC/ London: Duke University Press.CrossRef Google Scholar

Castañeda, Claudia, and Suchman, Lucy (forthcoming). Robot Visions. In Sharon Ghamari-Tabrizi (ed.), Companions with Haraway: Thinking together.

Chasin, Alexandra (1995). Class and its close relations: Identities among women, servants, and machines. In J. Halberstram and I. Livingston (eds.), Posthuman bodies (pp. 73–96). Bloomington: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar

Cherny, Lynn, and Reba Weise, Elizabeth (eds.). (1996). Wired women: Gender and new realities in cyberspace. Seattle, WA: Seal.Google Scholar

Chesher, Chris (2004). Invocation, evocation and avocation in new media art. Unpublished manuscript, University of Sydney, Australia.

Churchland, Paul (1984). Matter and consciousness. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar

Clancey, William (1997). Situated cognition: On human knowledge and computer representations. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Clark, Andy (1997). Being there: Putting brain, body, and world together again. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar

Clark, Andy (2001). Mindware: An introduction to the philosophy of cognitive science. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Clark, Andy (2003). Natural-born cyborgs: Minds, technologies, and the future of human intelligence. Oxford/New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Clarke, Adele, and Fujimura, Joan (eds.). (1992). The right tools for the job: At work in twentieth-century life sciences. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.CrossRef Google Scholar

Clement, Andrew (1993). Looking for the designers: Transforming the ‘invisible’ infrastructure of computerized office work. AI & Society 7: 323–344.CrossRef Google Scholar

Clement, Andrew (1994). Computing at work: Empowering action by ‘low-level’ users. Communications of the ACM 37: 53–63.CrossRef Google Scholar

Clement, Andrew, and Besselaar, Peter (1993). A retrospective look at PD projects. Communications of the ACM 36: 29–37.CrossRef Google Scholar

Cognitive Science (1993). Volume 17, No. 1 Special Issue: Situated Action, pp. 1–117.

Cohen, John (1966). Human robots in myth and science. London: Allen and Unwin.Google Scholar

Cohen, Paul (n. d.). Pragmatics, speaker-reference, and the modality of communication. Unpublished manuscript, Laboratory for Artificial Intelligence, Fairchild Camera and Instrument Corp, Palo Alto, CA.

Cohen, Paul, and Perrault, C. Ray (1979). Elements of a plan-based theory of speech acts. Cognitive Science 3: 177–212.CrossRef Google Scholar

Colby, Kenneth, Hilf, Franklin, Weber, Sylvia, and Kraemer, Helena (1972). Turing-like indistiguishability tests for the validation of a computer simulation of paranoid processes. Artificial Intelligence 3: 199–221.CrossRef Google Scholar

Collins, Harry M. (1985). Changing order: Replication and induction in scientific practice. London/Beverly Hills: Sage.Google Scholar

Collins, Harry M. (1990). Artificial experts: Social knowledge and intelligent machines. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar

Collins, Harry M., and Kusch, Martin (1998). The shape of actions: What humans and machines can do. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar

Coombs, Michael, and Alty, James (1984). Expert systems: An alternative paradigm. International Journal of Man–Machine Studies 20: 21–43.CrossRef Google Scholar

Cooper, Greg, and Bowers, John (1995). Representing the user: Notes on the disciplinary rhetoric of human–computer interaction. In P. Thomas (ed.), Social and interactional dimensions of human–computer interfaces (pp. 48–66). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Coulter, Jeff (1979). The social construction of mind. Totowa, NJ: Rowman & Littlefield.Google Scholar

Coulter, Jeff (1983). Rethinking cognitive theory. New York: St. Martin's Press.CrossRef Google Scholar

Cowan, Ruth Schwartz (1983). More work for mother: The ironies of household technology from the open hearth to the microwave. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar

Crist, Eileen (2000). Images of animals: Anthropomorphism and animal mind. Philadelphia: Temple University Press.Google Scholar

Crist, Eileen (2004). Can an insect speak?: The case of the honeybee dance. Social Studies of Science 34: 7–43.CrossRef Google Scholar

Crutzen, Cecile (1005). Intelligent ambience between heaven and hell: A salvation? Information, Communication Ethics and Society (ICES) 4.

Cussins, Charis (1998). Ontological choreography: Agency for women patients in an infertility clinic. In M. Berg and A.-M. Mol (eds.), Differences in medicine (pp. 166–201). Durham, NC: Duke University Press.Google Scholar

Certeau, Michel (1988). The practice of everyday life. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.Google Scholar

Laet, Marianne, and Mol, Annemarie (2000). The Zimbabwe bush pump: Mechanics of a fluid technology. Social Studies of Science 30: 225–263.CrossRef Google Scholar

de La Mettrie, Julien Offray (1748 (1994)). Man a machine and man a plant. Trans. Watson, Richard A. and Rybaka, Maya. Indianapolis: Hackett Publishing Co., Inc.Google Scholar

Dehn, Doris, and Mulken, Susanne (2000). The impact of animated interface agents: A review of empirical research. International Journal of Human–Computer Studies 52: 1–22.CrossRef Google Scholar

Dennett, Daniel (1978). Brainstorms. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar

Dennett, Daniel (1994). The practical requirements for making a conscious robot. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London A, 349: 133–146.CrossRef Google Scholar

di Leonardo, Micaela (1998). Exotics at home: Anthropologies, others, American modernities. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar

Dourish, Paul (2001). Where the action is: The foundations of embodied interaction. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar

Downey, Gary, and Dumit, Joseph (eds.). (1997). Cyborgs and citadels: Anthropological interventions in emerging sciences and technologies. Santa Fe, NM: School of American Research.Google Scholar

Doyle, Richard (1997). On beyond living: Rhetorical transformations of the life sciences. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar

Doyle, Richard (2003). Wetwares: Experiments in postvital living. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar

Dreyfus, Hubert (ed.). (1982). Husserl, intentionality and cognitive science. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar

Dreyfus, Hubert (1991). Being-in-the-world: A commentary on Heidegger's being and time, division 1. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar

Dreyfus, Hubert (1992). What computers still can't do. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar

Dror, Otniel (1999). Scientific image of emotion: Experience and technologies of inscription. Configurations 7: 355–401.CrossRef Google Scholar

Dror, Otniel (2001). Counting the affects: Discoursing in numbers. Social Research 68 (2): 357–378.Google Scholar

Dumit, Joseph (2004). Picturing personhood: Brain scans and biomedical identity. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar

Duncan, Starkey Jr., (1974). On the structure of speaker–auditor interaction during speaking turns. Language in Society 3: 161–180.CrossRef Google Scholar

Durkheim, Emile (1938). The rules of the sociological method. New York: The Free Press.Google Scholar

Edwards, Derek (1994). Imitation and artifice in apes, humans, and machines. American Behavioral Scientist 37: 754–772.CrossRef Google Scholar

Edwards, Paul (1996). The closed world: Computers and the politics of discourse in Cold War America. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar

Ehn, Pelle (1988). Work-oriented design of computer artifacts. Stockholm: Arbetslivscentrum.Google Scholar

Erickson, Frederick (1982). Money tree, lasagna bush, salt and pepper: Social construction of topical cohesion in a conversation among Italian-Americans. In D. Tannen (ed.), Georgetown University roundtable on language and linguistics: Analyzing discourse: Text and talk. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.Google Scholar

Erickson, Frederick (1982). The counselor as gatekeeper. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar

Farrell, Robert, Anderson, John, and Reiser, Brian (1984). An interactive computer-based tutor for LISP. In Proceedings of the Fourth National Conference on Artificial Intelligence, 106–111. Menlo Park, Calif.: AAAI Press.

Featherstone, Mike, and Burrows, Roger (1995). Cyberspace, cyberbodies, cyberpunk: Cultures of technological embodiment. London: Sage.Google Scholar

Feitelson, J., and Stefik, Mark (1977). A case study of reasoning in a genetics experiment. (Heuristic Programming Project, Working Paper 77–18). Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar

Fikes, Richard, and Nilsson, Neils (1971). STRIPS: A new approach to the application of theorem proving to problem solving. Artificial Intelligence 2: 189–205.CrossRef Google Scholar

Fitter, Mike (1979). Towards more ‘natural’ interactive systems. International Journal of Man–Machine Studies 11: 339–349.CrossRef Google Scholar

Fodor, Jerome (1983). The modularity of mind. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar

Frankel, Richard (1984). From sentence to sequence: Understanding the medical encounter through microinteractional analysis. Discourse Processes 7: 135–170.CrossRef Google Scholar

Franklin, Sarah (1995). Science as culture, cultures of science. Annual Reviews of Anthropology 24: 163–184.CrossRef Google Scholar

Franklin, Sarah (2000). Life itself: Global nature and the genetic imaginary. In S. Franklin, C. Lury, and J. Stacey (eds.), Global nature, global culture (pp. 188–227). London: Sage.Google Scholar

Franklin, Sarah, and Ragone, Helen (eds.). (1998). Reproducing reproduction: Kinship, power and technological innovation. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.Google Scholar

Franklin, Sarah, Lury, Celia, and Stacey, Jackie (2000). Global nature, global culture. London: Sage.Google Scholar

Frazer, James (1900). The golden bough: A study in magic and religion. London: Macmillan. (Reprinted 1980.)Google Scholar

Fujimura, Joan (1992). Crafting science: Standardized packages, boundary objects and “translation.” In A. Pickering (ed.), Science as practice and culture (pp. 168–211). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar

Fujimura, Joan (1996). Crafting science: A sociohistory of the quest for the genetics of cancer. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.CrossRef Google Scholar

Galaty, James (1981). Models and metaphors: On the semiotic explanation of segmentary systems. In L. Holy and M. Stuchlik (eds.), The structure of folk models (pp. 63–92). New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar

Galison, Peter (1987). How experiments end. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar

Galison, Peter (1997). Image and logic: A material culture of microphysics. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar

Gardner, Howard (1985). The mind's new science. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar

Garfinkel, Harold (1967). Studies in ethnomethodology. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.Google Scholar

Garfinkel, Harold (1972). Remarks on ethnomethodology. In J. Gumperz and D. Hymes (eds.), Directions in sociolinguistics: The ethnography of communication (pp. 301–324). New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.Google Scholar

Garfinkel, Harold (2002). Ethnomethodology's programme: Working out Durkheim's aphorism. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield Publishers. P. 23.Google Scholar

Garfinkel, Harold, Lynch, Michael, and Livingston, Eric (1981). The work of a discovering science construed with materials from the optically discovered pulsar. Philosophy of the Social Sciences 111: 131–159.CrossRef Google Scholar

Garfinkel, Harold, and Rawls, Anne (2002). Ethnomethodology's program: Working out Durkeim's aphorism. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield.Google Scholar

Garfinkel, Harold, and Sacks, Harvey (1970). On formal structures of practical actions. In J. McKinney and E. Tiryakian (eds.), Theoretical sociology: Perspectives and development (pp. 337–366). New York: Appleton Century Crofts.Google Scholar

Geertz, Clifford (1973). The interpretation of cultures. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar

Gell, Alfred (1998). Art and agency: An anthropological theory. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Gilbert, Nigel, and Heath, Christian (eds.). (1985). Social action and artificial intelligence. Aldershot, Hampshire, UK/Brookfield, VT: Gower.Google Scholar

Gladwin, Thomas (1964). Culture and logical process. In W. Goodenough (ed.), Explorations in cultural anthropology (pp. 167–177). New York: McGraw–Hill.Google Scholar

Gladwin, Thomas (1970). East is a big bird: Navigation and logic on Puluwat Atoll. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar

Goffman, Erving (1975). Replies and responses. Language in Society 5: 257–313.CrossRef Google Scholar

Gonzalez, Jennifer (2000). Envisioning cyborg bodies: Notes from current research. In G. E. A. Kirkup (ed.), The gendered cyborg (pp. 58–73). New York/London: Routledge.Google Scholar

Goodwin, Charles (1981). Conversational organization: Interaction between speakers and hearers. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar

Goodwin, Charles (1994). Professional vision. American Anthropologist 96: 606–633.CrossRef Google Scholar

Goodwin, Charles (1995a). Seeing in depth. Social Studies of Science 25: 237–274.CrossRef Google Scholar

Goodwin, Charles (1995b). Co-constructing meaning in conversations with an aphasic man. Research on Language and Social Interaction 28: 233–260.CrossRef Google Scholar

Goodwin, Charles (1997). The blackness of black: Color categories as situated practice. In L. Resnick, R. Saljo, C. Pontecorvo, and B. Burge (eds.), Discourse, tools and reasoning (pp. 111–142). Berlin: Springer-Verlag.Google Scholar

Goodwin, Charles (2003). The body in action. In J. Coupland and R. Gwyn (eds.), Discourse, the body and identity (pp. 19–42). NY: Palgrave/Macmillan.Google Scholar

Goodwin, Charles, and Goodwin, Marjorie Harness (1992). Context, activity and participation. In P. Lauer and A. di Luzio (eds.), The contextualization of language (pp. 77–99). Amsterdam: Benjamins.Google Scholar

Goodwin, Charles, and Goodwin, Marjorie Harness (1996). Seeing as situated activity: Formulating planes. In Y. Engestrom and D. Middleton (eds.), Cognition and communication at work (pp. 61–95). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Goodwin, Charles, and Goodwin, Marjorie Harness (1997). Contested vision: The discursive constitution of Rodney King. In B.-L. Gunnarsson, P. Linell, and B. Nordberg (eds.), The construction of professional discourse (pp. 292–316). New York: Longman.Google Scholar

Goodwin, Dawn (2004). Acting in anaesthesia: Agency, participation, and legitimation. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Lancaster University.

Goodwin, Marjorie Harness (1980). Processes of mutual monitoring implicated in the production of description sequences. Sociological Inquiry 50: 303–317.CrossRef Google Scholar

Grand, Steve (2003). Growing up with Lucy: How to build an android in twenty easy steps. London: Weidenfeld & Nicolson.Google Scholar

Green, Nicola (2002). On the move: Technology, mobility, and the mediation of social time and space. The Information Society 18: 281–292.CrossRef Google Scholar

Greenbaum, Joan, and Kyng, Morten (1991) (eds.). Design at work: Cooperative design of computer systems (pp. ⅹ, 294). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar

Gregory, Judith (2000). Sorcerer's apprentice: Creating the electronic health record, re-inventing medical records and patient care. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Department of Communications, University of California, San Diego.

Grice, H. P. (1975). Logic and conversation. In P. Cole and J. Morgan (eds.), Syntax and semantics: Vol 3. Speech acts (pp. 41–58). New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar

Grint, Keith, and Woolgar, Steve (1997). The machine at work: Technology, work, and organization. Cambridge, UK/Malden, MA: Polity.Google Scholar

Grosz, Barbara (1981). Focusing and description in natural language dialogues. In A. Joshi, B. Webber, and I. Sag (eds.). Elements of discourse understanding. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

Grosz, Elizabeth (1994). Volatile bodies: Toward a corporeal feminism. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar

Grudin, Jonathan (1990). The computer reaches out: The historical continuity of interface design. In J. C. Chew and J. Whiteside (eds.), Proceedings of the ACM CHI 90 Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, New York: ACM Press, pp. 261–268.Google Scholar

Gumperz, John (1982a). Discourse strategies. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.CrossRef Google Scholar

Gumperz, John (1982b). The linguistic bases of communicative competence. In D. Tannen (ed.)., Georgetown University roundtable on language and linguistics: Analyzing discourse: Text and talk (pp. 323–334). Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.Google Scholar

Gumperz, John, and Tannen, Deborah (1979). Individual and social differences in language use. In C. Fillmore et al. (eds.), Individual differences in language ability and language behavior. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar

Gupta, Akhil, and Ferguson, James (1997). Anthropological locations: Boundaries and grounds of a field science. Berkeley: University of California.Google Scholar

Halberstam, Judith (1991). Automating gender: Postmodern feminism in the age of the intelligent machines. Feminist Studies 17: 439–460.CrossRef Google Scholar

Halberstam, Judith, and Livingston, Ira (eds.). (1995). Posthuman bodies. Bloomington/Indianapolis: Indiana University.Google Scholar

Hales, Mike (1994). Where are designers? Styles of design practice, objects of design, and views of users in CSCW. In D. Rosenberg and C. Hutchison (eds.), Design issues in CSCW (pp. 151–177). New York: Springer-Verlag.Google Scholar

Haraway, Donna (1985/1991). Manifesto for cyborgs: Science, technology and socialist feminisim in the 1980s. In Simians, cyborgs, and women: The reinvention of nature. New York: Routledge. (Originally published in Socialist Review (1985) 80: 65–108.)Google Scholar

Haraway, Donna (1991). Simians, cyborgs, and women: The reinvention of nature. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar

Haraway, Donna (1997). Modest _Witness @Second_Millenium.FemaleMan_Meets_OncoMouse™: Feminism and Technoscience. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar

Haraway, Donna (2003). The companion species manifesto: Dogs, people and significant others. Chicago: Prickly Paradigm Press.Google Scholar

Harding, Sandra (1986). The science question in feminism. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar

Harding, Sandra (1991). Whose science? Whose knowledge?: Thinking from women's lives. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar

Hayes, Patrick (1981). A construction-specific approach to focused interaction in flexible parsing. In Proceedings of the Nineteenth Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (pp. 149–152). Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar

Hayes, Patrick, and Reddy, Raj (1983). Steps toward graceful interaction in spoken and written man–machine communication. International Journal of Man–Machine Studies 19: 231–284.CrossRef Google Scholar

Hayles, N. Katherine (1999). How we became posthuman: Virtual bodies in cybernetics, literature, and informatics. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.CrossRef Google Scholar

Hayles, N. Katherine (2002). Flesh and metal: Reconfiguring the mindbody in virtual environments. Configurations 10: 297–320.CrossRef Google Scholar

Hayles, N. Katherine (2005). Computing the human. Theory, Culture & Society 22: 131–151.CrossRef Google Scholar

Heap, James (1980). Description in ethnomethodology. Human Studies 3: 87–106.CrossRef Google Scholar

Heath, Christian (1986). Body movement and speech in medical interaction. Cambridge, UK/New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRef Google Scholar

Heath, Christian, and Luff, Paul (1992). Collaboration and control: Crisis management and multimedia technology in London Undergound line control rooms. Computer-Supported Cooperative Work 1(1): 69–94.CrossRef Google Scholar

Heath, Christian, and Luff, Paul (2000). Technology in action. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.CrossRef Google Scholar

Heath, Christian, Svensson, Marcus, Hindmarsh, Jon, Luff, Paul, and Vom Lehn, Dirk (2002). Configuring awareness. Computer-Supported Cooperative Work 11: 317–347.CrossRef Google Scholar

Hedberg, Sara Reese (2000). After desktop computing: A progress report on smart environments research. IEEE Intelligent Systems and Their Applications 15: 7–9.CrossRef Google Scholar

Helmreich, Stefan (1998). Silicon second nature: Culturing artificial life in a digital world. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar

Henderson, Kathryn (1999). On line and on paper: Visual representations, visual culture, and computer graphics in design engineering. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar

Hendrix, Gary (1977). Human engineering for applied natural language processing. In Proceedings of the Fifth International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence (pp. 183–191). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar

Heritage, John (1984). Garfinkel and ethnomethodology. Cambridge, UK: Polity Press.Google Scholar

Hirschauer, Stefan (1991). The manufacture of bodies in surgery. Social Studies of Science 21(2): 279–319.CrossRef Google Scholar

Hirsh, Haym (1999). Roomservice, AI-style. IEEE Intelligent Systems and Their Applications March/April: 8–10.

Hogle, Linda (1999). Recovering the nation's body: Cultural memory, medicine, and the politics of redemption. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press.Google Scholar

Hughes, John, Randall, David, and Shapiro, Dan (1993). From ethnographic record to system design: Some experiences from the field. Computer-Supported Cooperative Work 1: 123–141.CrossRef Google Scholar

Hutchins, Edwin (1983). Understanding Micronesian navigation. In D. Gertner and A. Stevens (eds.), Mental models (pp. 191–225). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar

Hutchins, Edwin (1995). Cognition in the wild. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar

Hymes, Dell H. (1974). Reinventing anthropology. New York: Random House.Google Scholar

Ingold, Tim (2000). The perception of the environment: Essays in livelihood, dwelling and skill. London/New York: Routledge.CrossRef Google Scholar

Ito, Mimi, Okabe, Daisuke, and Matsuda, Misa (2005). Personal, portable, pedestrian: Mobile phones in Japanese life. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar

Jain, Sarah (1999). The prosthetic imagination: Enabling and disabling the prosthesis trope. Science, Technology and Human Values 24: 31–54.CrossRef Google Scholar

Jain, Sarah (2006). Injury: The politics of product design and safety law in the United States. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar

Jefferson, Gail (1972). Side sequences. In D. Sudnow (ed.), Studies in social interaction (pp. 294–338). New York: Free Press.Google Scholar

Jefferson, Gail (1983). Issues in the transcription of naturally occurring talk: Caricature versus capturing pronunciational particulars. (Tilburg Papers in Language and Literature, no. 34). Amsterdam, The Netherlands: Tilburg University.Google Scholar

Jeremijenko, Natalie (2004). If things can talk, what do they say? In N. Waldrip-Fruin and P. Harrigan (eds.), First person: New media as story, performance, and game (pp. 262–287). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar

Jordan, Brigitte, and Fuller, Nancy (1975). On the non-fatal nature of trouble sense-making and sense-managing in Lingua Franca talk. Semiotica 13: 1–31.CrossRef Google Scholar

Jordan, Kathleen, and Lynch, Michael (1992). The sociology of a genetic engineering technique: Ritual and rationality in the performance of the ‘plasmid prep.’ In A. Clarke and J. Fujimura (eds.), The right tools for the job: At work in twentieth-century life sciences (pp. 77–114). Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar

Joshi, Arvon, Webber, Bonnie, and Sag, Ivan (eds.) (1981). Elements of discourse understanding. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Kantrowitz, Barbara (1994, January 17). The butlers of the digital age will be just a keystroke away. Newsweek, p. 58.

Keller, Evelyn Fox (2002a). Making sense of life: Explaining biological development with models, metaphors and machines. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar

Keller, Evelyn Fox (2002b). Marrying the premodern to the postmodern: Computers and organisms after WWII. In D. Tofts, A. Jonson, and A. Cavallaro (eds.), Prefiguring cyberculture (pp. 52–65). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar

Keller, Evelyn Fox (2007). Booting up baby. In J. Riskin (ed.), The Sistine gap. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.

Kember, Sarah (1998). Virtual anxiety: Photography, new technologies and subjectivity. Manchester: Manchester University Press.Google Scholar

Kember, Sarah (2003). Cyberfeminism and artificial life. London/New York: Routledge.CrossRef Google Scholar

Kirby, Vicki (1997). Telling flesh: The substance of the corporeal. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar

Knorr Cetina, Karin (1999). Epistemic cultures: How the sciences make knowledge. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar

Knorr Cetina, Karin, and Mulkay, Michael (eds.). (1983). Science observed: Perspectives on the social study of science. London: Sage.Google Scholar

Knorr, Karin (1981). The manufacture of knowledge: An essay on the constructivist and contextual nature of science. Oxford/New York: Pergamon.Google Scholar

Koschmann, Timothy (ed.). (2003). Plans and situated actions: A retro-review. Books & Ideas, Journal of the Learning Sciences 12(2): 257–306.

Kubrick, Stanley, and Clarke, Arthur C. (1968). 2001: A Space Odyssey.

Landauer, Thomas (1995). The trouble with computers: Usefulness, usability, and productivity. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar

Latour, Bruno (1986). Visualization and cognition: Thinking with eyes and hands. Knowledge and Society 6: 1–40.Google Scholar

Latour, Bruno (1987). Science in action: How to follow scientists and engineers through society. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar

Latour, Bruno (1988). The pasteurization of France. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar

Latour, Bruno (1992). Where are the missing masses: The sociology of a few mundane artifacts. In W. Bijker and J. Law (eds.), Shaping technology/building society (pp. 225–258). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar

Latour, Bruno (1993). We have never been modern. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar

Latour, Bruno (1999). Pandora's hope: Essays on the reality of science studies. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar

Latour, Bruno, and Woolgar, Steve (1979). Laboratory life: The social construction of scientific facts. Beverly Hills: Sage.Google Scholar

Lave, Jean (1988). Cognition in practice: Mind, mathematics, and culture in everyday life. Cambridge/New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRef Google Scholar

Law, John (1987). Technology and heterogeneous engineering: The case of Portuguese expansion. In W. Bijker, T. Hughes, and T. Pinch (eds.), The social construction of technological systems (pp. 111–134). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar

Law, John (1994). Organizing modernity. Oxford, UK/Cambridge, MA: Blackwell.Google Scholar

Law, John (1996). Organizing accountabilities: Ontology and the mode of accounting. In R. Munro and J. Mouritsen (eds.), Accountability: Power, ethos and the technologies of managing (pp. 283–306). London: International Thomas Business Press.Google Scholar

Law, John (2002). Aircraft stories: Decentering the object in technoscience. Durham, NC/London: Duke University Press.CrossRef Google Scholar

Law, John (2004). After method: Mess in social science research. London/New York: Routledge.Google Scholar

Law, John, and Mol, Annemarie (eds.) (2002). Complexities: Social studies of knowledge practices. Durham, NC/London: Duke University Press.CrossRef Google Scholar

Lee, Nick, and Brown, Steve (1994). Otherness and the actor network: The undiscovered continent. American Behavioral Scientist 37: 772–790.CrossRef Google Scholar

Lenoir, Tim (2002). Embracing the posthuman. Configurations 10: 203–220.CrossRef Google Scholar

Levinson, Stephen (1983). Pragmatics. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.CrossRef Google Scholar

Lewis, David (1972). We, the navigators. Honolulu: University Press of Hawaii.Google Scholar

Lieberman, Henry (1997). Autonomous interface agents. Proceedings of the ACM CHI 97 Conference on human factors in computing systems (pp. 67–74). New York: ACM Press.Google Scholar

Lock, Margaret M. (2002). Twice dead: Organ transplants and the reinvention of death. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar

London, Bob, and Clancey, William (1982). Plan recognition strategies in student modeling: Prediction and description. Proceedings of the Second National Conference on Artificial Intelligence, 335–338. Menlo Park, Calif.: AAAI Press.

Luff, Paul, Gilbert, Nigel, and Frohlich, David (eds.). (1990). Computers and conversation. London/San Diego: Academic Press.Google Scholar

Luff, Paul, Hindmarsh, Jon, and Heath, Christian (eds.). (2000). Workplace studies: Recovering work practice and informing system design. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.CrossRef Google Scholar

Lynch, Michael (1982). Technical work and critical enquiry: Investigation in a scientific laboratory. Social Studies of Science 12: 499–533.

Lynch, Michael (1985a). Art and artifact in laboratory science: A study of shop work and shop talk in a research laboratory. London/Boston: Routledge & Kegan Paul.Google Scholar

Lynch, Michael (1985b). Discipline and the material form of images: An analysis of scientific visibility. Social Studies of Science 15: 37–66.CrossRef Google Scholar

Lynch, Michael (1988). The externalized retina: Selection and mathematization in the visual documentation of objects in the life sciences. Human Studies 11: 201–234.CrossRef Google Scholar

Lynch, Michael (1991a). Laboratory space and the technological domplex: An investigation of topical contextures. Science in Context 4: 51–78.CrossRef Google Scholar

Lynch, Michael (1991b). Ordinary and scientific measurement as ethnomethodological phenomena. In G. Button (ed.), Ethnomethodology and the human sciences (pp. 77–108). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Lynch, Michael (1993). Scientific practice and ordinary action: Ethnomethodology and social studies of science. Cambridge, UK/New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Lynch, Michael (2001). Ethnomethodology and the logic of practice. In T. Schatzki, K. K. Cetina, and E. Von Savigny (eds.), The practice turn in contemporary theory (pp. 131–148). London/New York: Routledge.Google Scholar

Lynch, Michael, and Jordan, Kathleen (1995). Instructed action in, of, and as molecular biology. Human Studies 18: 227–244.CrossRef Google Scholar

Lynch, Michael, and Jordan, Kathleen (2000). Patents, promotions and protocols: Mapping and claiming scientific territory. Mind, Culture & Activity 7: 124–146.CrossRef Google Scholar

Lynch, Michael, Livingston, Eric, and Garfinkel, Harold (1983). Temporal order in laboratory work. In K. Knorr and M. Mulkay (eds.), Science observed (pp. 205–238). London: Sage.Google Scholar

Lynch, Michael, and Woolgar, Steve (eds.). (1990). Representation in scientific practice. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar

Macbeth, Douglas (1996). The discovery of situated worlds: Analytic commitments, or moral orders?Human Studies 19: 267–287.CrossRef Google Scholar

MacKay, D. (1962). The use of behavioral language to refer to mechanical processes. British Journal of Philosophical Science 13: 89–103.CrossRef Google Scholar

Malinowski, Bronislaw (1935). Coral gardens and their magic. London: Allen & Unwin.Google Scholar

Mann, Steve, and Niedzviecki, Hal (2001). Cyborg: Digital destiny and human possibility in the age of the wearable computer. Doubleday Canada.Google Scholar

Marcus, George (1995). Ethnograpy in/of the world system: The emergence of multi-sited ethnography. Annual Reviews of Anthropology 24: 95–117.CrossRef Google Scholar

Marcus, George (ed.). (1999). Critical anthropology now: Unexpected contexts, shifting constituencies, changing agendas. Santa Fe, NM: School of American Research.Google Scholar

Marcus, George, and Fischer, Michael (1986). Anthropology as cultural critique: An experimental moment in the human sciences. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar

Marks, Laura U. (2002). Touch: Sensuous theory and multisensory media. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar

Markussen, Randi (1995). Constructing easiness – Historical perspectives on work, computerization, and women. In S. L. Star (ed.), Cultures of computing (pp. 158–180). Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar

Mauss, Marcel (1902). A general theory of magic. New York: Norton.Google Scholar

Mauss, Marcel (1954). The gift. London: Cohen & West.Google Scholar

McCorduck, Pamela (1979). Machines who think. San Francisco, CA: W. H. Freeman.Google Scholar

McDermott, Ray (1976). Kids make sense: An ethnographic account of the itneractional management of success and failure in one first-grade classroom. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Stanford University.

M'charek, Amade (2005). The Human genome diversity project: An ethnography of scientific practice. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.CrossRef Google Scholar

McNeil, Maureen (ed.) (1987). Gender and expertise. London: Free Association Books.Google Scholar

Mead, George H. (1934). Mind, self and society from the standpoint of a social behaviorist. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar

Menzel, Peter, and D'Aluisio, Faith (2000). Robo sapiens. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar

Merritt, Marilyn (1977). On questions following questions in service encounters. Language in Society 5: 315–357.CrossRef Google Scholar

Mialet, Helene (2003). Reading Hawking's presence: An interview with a self-effacing man. Critical Inquiry 29: 571–598.CrossRef Google Scholar

Middleton, David, and Brown, Steven (2005). Net-working on a neonatl intensive care unit: The baby as a virtual object. In B. Czarniiawska and T. Hernes (eds.), Actor-network theory and organizing (pp. 307–328). Copenhagen: Copenhagen Business School Press.Google Scholar

Miller, George A., Galanter, Eugene, and Pribram, Karl H. (1960). Plans and the structure of behavior. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.CrossRef Google Scholar

Mills, C. Wright (1940). Situated actions and vocabularies of motive. American Sociological Review 5: 904–913.CrossRef Google Scholar

Mol, Annemarie (2002). The body multiple: Ontology in medical practice. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.CrossRef Google Scholar

Moore, C. L. (1975). No woman born. In T. Scortia and G. Zebrowski (eds.), Human-machines: An anthology of stories about cyborgs (pp. 63–118). New York: Vintage.Google Scholar

Mort, Maggie, Goodwin, Dawn, Smith, Andrew, and Pope, Catherine (2005). Safe asleep? Human–machine relations in medical practice. Social Science & Medicine 61: 2027–2037.CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Mulcahy, Dianne (1999). Working bodies and representations: Tales from a training field. Science, Technology and Human Values 24: 80–104.CrossRef Google Scholar

Newman, Susan (1998). Here, there, and nowhere at all: Distribution, negotiation, and virtuality in postmodern ethnography and engineering. Knowledge and Society 11: 235–267.Google Scholar

Newell, Allen, and Simon, Herbert (1972). Human problem solving. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.Google Scholar

Nickerson, Ray (1976). On conversational interaction with computers. In Proccedings of ACM SIGGRAPH workshop, October 14–15, pp. 101–113, Pittsburgh, PA.

Nilsson, Neils (1973). A hierarchical robot planning and execution system. (Technical Note 76). Menlo Park, CA: SRI Artificial Intelligence Center.Google Scholar

Noble, David (1984). Forces of production. New York/Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Oberquelle, Horst, Kupka, I., and Maass, S. (1983). A view of human–machine communication and cooperation. International Journal of Man–Machine Studies 19: 309–333.CrossRef Google Scholar

Ochs, Eleanor (1979). Planned and unplanned discourse. In T. Givon (ed.), Syntax and semantics: Vol. 12. Discourse and syntax (pp. 51–78). New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar

Orr, Julian (1996). Talking about machines: An ethnography of a modern job. Ithaca, NY: ILR Press.Google Scholar

Oudshoorn, Nelly, and Pinch, Trevor (eds.). (2003). How users matter: The co-construction of users and technologies. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar

Peachey, D., and McCalla, G. (1986). Using planning techniques in intelligent tutoring systems. International Journal of Man–Machine Studies 24: 77–98.CrossRef Google Scholar

Pedersen, Elin Rønby, and Sokoler, Thomas (1997). AROMA – Abstract representation of mediated presence supporting mutual awareness. Proceedings of the ACM CHI 97 Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (pp. 51–58). New York: ACM Press.Google Scholar

Peirce, Charles (1933). In C. Hartshorne and P. Weiss (eds.), Collected papers (Vol. 11). Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar

Picard, Rosalind (1997). Affective computing. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.CrossRef Google Scholar

Pickering, Andrew (1984). Constructing quarks: A sociological history of particle physics. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.Google Scholar

Pickering, Andrew (ed.). (1992). Science as practice and culture. Chicago/London: University of Chicago Press.CrossRef Google Scholar

Pickering, Andrew (1995). The mangle of practice: Time, agency and science. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.CrossRef Google Scholar

Pickering, Andrew (2002). Cybernetics and the mangle. Social Studies of Science 32: 413–438.CrossRef Google Scholar

Piller, Charles (2001, May 13). A step toward creating thoughtful machines. Greenwich Times, A8.

Prentice, Rachel (2005). Swimming in the joint: Surgery, technology, perception. Unpublished manuscript.

Price, Janet, and Shildrick, Magrit (eds.). (1999). Feminist theory and the body: A reader. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.Google Scholar

Pylyshyn, Zenon (1974). Minds, machines and phenomenology: Some reflections on Dreyfus'What Computers Can't Do. Cognition 3: 57–77.Google Scholar

Pylyshyn, Zenon (1984). Computation and cognition. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar

Rawls, Anne (1996). Durkheim's epistemology: The neglected argument. American Journal of Sociology 102(2): 430–482.

Rawls, Anne (2002). Editor's introduction. In Ethnomethodology's programme: Working out Durkheim's aphorism. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield Publishers. Pp. 1–76.

Reid, Roddey, and Traweek, Sharon (eds.). (2000). Doing Science + Culture: How cultural and interdisciplinary studies are changing the way we look at science and medicine. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar

Riecken, Douglas (1994). A conversation with Marvin Minsky about agents. Communications of the ACM 37: 23–29.Google Scholar

Risan, Lars (1997). Artificial life: A technoscience leaving modernity? An anthropology of subjects and objects. Retrieved August 10, 2005, from http://anthrobase.com/Txt/R/Risan_L_05.htm.

Riskin, Jessica (2003a). The defecating duck, or, the ambiguous origins of artificial life. Critical Inquiry 20: 599–633.CrossRef Google Scholar

Riskin, Jessica (2003b). Eighteenth century wetware. Representations 83: 97–125.

Riskin, Jessica (ed.). (2007). The Sistine gap: Essays in the history and philosophy of artificial life. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar

Robertson, Toni (2002). The public availability of actions and artefacts. Computer-Supported Cooperative Work 11: 299–316.CrossRef Google Scholar

Rogers, Yvonne, Sharp, Helen, and Preece, Jennifer (2002). Interaction design: Beyond human–computer interaction. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar

Rubin, Andrea (1980). A theoretical taxonomy of the differences between oral and written languge. In R. Spiro et al. (eds.), Theoretical issues in reading comprehension. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar

Sacerdoti, Earl (1975). The nonlinear nature of plans. In Proceedings of the Fourth International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence.

Sacerdoti, Earl (1977). A structure for plans and behavior. New York: Elsevier.Google Scholar

Sack, Warren (1997). Artificial human nature. Design Issues 13: 55–64.CrossRef Google Scholar

Sacks, Harvey (1963). On sociological description. Berkeley Journal of Sociology 8: 1–16.Google Scholar

Sacks, Harvey (1974). An analysis of the course of a joke's telling in converstion. In R. Bauman and J. Scherzer (eds.), Explorations in the ethnography of speaking (pp. 337–53). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Sacks, Harvey, Schegloff, Emanuel, and Jefferson, Gail (1978). A simplest systematics for the organization of turn-taking in conversation. In J. Schenkein (ed.), Studies in the organization of conversational interaction (pp. 7–55). New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar

Sandoval, Chela (1999). New sciences: Cyborg feminism and the methodology of the oppressed. In J. Wolmark (ed.), Cybersexualities (pp. 247–263). Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.Google Scholar

Sawyer, R. Keith (2003). Improvised dialogues: Emergence and creativity in conversation. Westport, CT: Ablex.Google Scholar

Schaffer, Simon (1999). Enlightened automata. In W. Clark, J. Golinski, and S. Shaffer (eds.), The sciences in enlightened Europe (pp. 126–165). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar

Schank, Robert, and Abelson, R. (1977). Scripts, plans and knowledge. In P. Johson-Laird and P. Wason (eds.), Thinking: Readings in cognitive science. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Scheflen, Albert (1974). How behavior means. Garden City, NY: Anchor Press.Google Scholar

Schegloff, Emanuel (1972). Sequencing in conversational openings. In J. Gumperz and D. Hymes (eds.)., Directions in sociolinguistics: The ethnography of communication (pp. 346–380). New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar

Schegloff, Emanuel (1982). Discourse as an interactional achievement: Some uses of “uh huh” and other things that come between sentences. In D. Tannen (ed.), Georgetown University roundtable on language and linguistics: Analyzing discourse and talk (pp. 71–93). Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.Google Scholar

Schegloff, Emanuel (1998). Body torque. Social Research 65: 535–596.Google Scholar

Schegloff, Emanuel, and Sacks, Harvey (1973). Opening up closings. Semiotica 7: 289–327.Google Scholar

Schiebinger, Londa (ed.). (2000). Feminism & the body. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Schmidt, C., Sridharan, N., and Goodson, J. (1978). The plan recognition problem. Artificial Intelligence 11: 45–83.CrossRef Google Scholar

Schmidt, Kjeld, and Wagner, Ina (2004). Ordering systems: Coordinative practices and artifacts in architectural design and planning. Computer-Supported Cooperative Work 13: 349–408.CrossRef Google Scholar

Schuler, Douglas, and Namioka, Aki (eds.). (1993). Participatory design: Principles and practices. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar

Schull, Natasha (2005). Digital gambling: The coincidence of desire and design. ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science 597: 65–81.

Schull, Natasha (in press). Machine life: Control and compulsion in Las Vegas. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

Schutz, Alfred (1962). Collected papers I: The problem of social reality. The Hague: Martinus Nijhoff.Google Scholar

Searle, John (1969). Speech acts: An essay in the philosophy of language. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.CrossRef Google Scholar

Searle, John (1979). Expression and meaning. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.CrossRef Google Scholar

Searle, John (1980). The intentionality of intention and action. Cognitive Science 4: 47–70.CrossRef Google Scholar

Sengers, Phoebe (2004). The autonomous agency of STS: Boundary crossings between STS and artificial intelligence. Unpublished manuscript. (Submitted to Social Studies of Science.)

Shapin, Steve (1989). The invisible technician. American Scientist 77: 553–563.Google Scholar

Shapin, Steven, and Schaffer, Simon (1985). Leviathan and the air-pump: Hobbes, Boyle, and the experimental life. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar

Sharrock, Wes, and Button, Graham (2003). Plans and situated actions ten years on. The Journal of the Learning Sciences 12(2): 259–264.CrossRef Google Scholar

Shrager, Jeff and Finin, Tom (1982). An expert system that volunteers advice. Proceedings of the Second National Conference on Artificial Intelligence, 339–340. Menlo Park, Calif.: AAAI Press.Google Scholar

Sidner, Candace (1979). Towards a computational theory of definite anaphora comprehension in English discourse. (Technical Report TR-537). Cambridge, MA: MIT AI Laboratory.Google Scholar

Simon, Herbert (1969). The sciences of the artificial. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar

Singleton, Vicky (1998). Stabilizing instabilities: The laboratory in the UK Cervical Screening Program. In M. Berg and A. Mol (eds.), Differences in medicine (pp. 86–104). Durham, NC: Duke University Press.Google Scholar

Smith, Brian Cantwell (1996). On the origin of objects. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar

Smith, Dorothy E. (1987). The everyday world as problematic: A feminist sociology. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.Google Scholar

Spender, Dale (1996). Nattering on the net: Women, power and cyberspace. Toronto: Garamond.Google Scholar

Standage, Tom (2002). The Turk: The life and times of the famous eighteenth-century chess-playing machine. New York: Walker & Co.Google Scholar

Star, Susan Leigh (1989a). Regions of the mind: Brain research and the quest for scientific certainty. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar

Star, Susan Leigh (1989b). Layered space, formal representations and long distance control: The politics of information. Fundamenta Scientiae 10: 125–155.Google Scholar

Star, Susan Leigh (1991). Invisible work and silenced dialogues in knowledge representation. In I. Eriksson, B. Kitchenham, and K. Tijdens (eds.), Women, work and computerization (pp. 81–92). Amsterdam: North Holland.Google Scholar

Star, Susan Leigh (ed.). (1995). The cultures of computing. Oxford, UK/Cambridge, MA: Blackwell.Google Scholar

Star, Susan Leigh, and Griesemer, James (1989). Institutional ecology, ‘translations’ and boundary objects: Amateurs and professionals in Berkeley's Museum of Vertebrate Zoology. Social Studies of Science 19: 387–420.CrossRef Google Scholar

Stelarc (2004). Prosthetic head: Intelligence, awareness and agency. Unpublished manuscript, University of Melbourne.

Stich, Stephen (1983). From folk psychology to cognitive science. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar

Strathern, Marilyn (1988). The gender of the gift: Problems with women and problems with society in Melanesia. Berkeley: University of California Press.CrossRef Google Scholar

Strathern, Marilyn (1992). Reproducing the future: Essays on anthropology, kinship, and the new reproductive technologies. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar

Strathern, Marilyn (1996). Cutting the network. Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute 2: 517–535.CrossRef Google Scholar

Strathern, Marilyn (1999). Property, substance, and effect: Anthropological essays on persons and things. London/New Brunswick, NJ: Athlone Press.Google Scholar

Strathern, Marilyn (ed.). (2000). Audit cultures: Anthropological studies in accountability, ethics, and the academy. London/New York: Routledge.CrossRef Google Scholar

Streeck, Jurgen (1980). Speech acts in interaction: A critique of Searle. Discourse Processes 3: 133–154.CrossRef Google Scholar

Suchman, Lucy (1982). Toward a sociology of human–machine interaction: Pragmatics of instruction following. (CIS Working Paper, Xerox Palo Alto Research Center). Palo Alto, CA: Author.Google Scholar

Suchman, Lucy (1987). Plans and situated actions: The problem of human–machine communication. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Suchman, Lucy (1993a). Response to Vera and Simon's ‘Situated action: A symbolic interpretation.’ Cognitive Science 17(1): 71–76.CrossRef Google Scholar

Suchman, Lucy (1993b). Technologies of accountability: On lizards and airplanes. In G. Button (ed.), Technology in working order (pp. 113–126). London: Routledge.Google Scholar

Suchman, Lucy (1994a). Working relations of technology production and use. Computer-Supported Cooperative Work 2: 21–39.CrossRef Google Scholar

Suchman, Lucy (1994b). Do categories have politics? The language-action perspective reconsidered. Computer-Supported Cooperative Work 2: 177–190.CrossRef Google Scholar

Suchman, Lucy (1995). Making work visible. Communications of the ACM 38(9): 56–64.

Suchman, Lucy (1999). Working relations of technology production and use. In D. Mackenzie and J. Wajcman (eds.), The social shaping of technology, 2nd ed. (pp. 258–268). Buckingham, UK/Philadelphia: Open University Press.Google Scholar

Suchman, Lucy (2000). Embodied practices of engineering work. Mind, Culture & Activity 7: 4–18.

Suchman, Lucy (2001). Building bridges: Practice-based ethnographies of contemporary technology. In M. Schiffer (ed.), Anthropological perspectives on technology (pp. 163–177). Albuquerque: University of New Mexico Press.Google Scholar

Suchman, Lucy (2002a). Located accountabilities in technology production. Scandinavian Journal of Information Systems 14: 91–105.Google Scholar

Suchman, Lucy (2002b). Practice-based design: Notes from the hyper-developed world. The Information Society 18: 1–6.CrossRef Google Scholar

Suchman, Lucy (2003). Writing and reading: A response to comments on plans and situated actions: The problem of human–machine communication. The Journal of the Learning Sciences 12 (2): 299–306.CrossRef Google Scholar

Suchman, Lucy (2005). Affiliative objects. Organisation 12(3): 379–399.Google Scholar

Suchman, Lucy, Blomberg, Jeanette, Orr, Julian, and Trigg, Randall (1999). Reconstructing technologies as social practice. American Behavioral Scientist 43: 392–408.CrossRef Google Scholar

Suchman, Lucy, and Jordan, Brigitte (1989). Computerization and women's knowledge. In K. Tijdens, M. Jennings, I. Wagner, and M. Weggelaar (eds.), Women, work and computerization (pp. 153–160). Amsterdam: North Holland. (Reprinted in P. Agre and D. Schuler (eds.) (1997). Reinventing technology, rediscovering community: Critical explorations in computing as a social practice (pp. 97–105). Greenwich, CT: Ablex.)Google Scholar

Suchman, Lucy, Trigg, Randall, and Blomberg, Jeanette (2002). Working artefacts: Ethnomethods of the prototype. British Journal of Sociology 53: 163–179.

Taussig, Michael (1993). Mimesis and alterity: A particular history of the senses. London: Routledge.Google Scholar

Terry, Jennifer, and Calvert, Melodie (eds.). (1997). Processed lives: Gender and technology in everyday life. London/New York: Routledge.Google Scholar

Thomas, Frank, and Johnston, Ollie (1981). Disney animation: The illusion of life. New York: Abbeville.Google Scholar

Thomas, Peter J. (1995). The social and interactional dimensions of human–computer interfaces. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Thompson, Charis (2005). Making parents: The ontological choreography of reproductive technologies. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar

Timmermans, Stefan (1999). Sudden death and the myth of CPR. Philadelphia, PA: Temple University Press.Google Scholar

Timmermans, Stefan, and Berg, Marc (1997). Standardization in action: Achieving local universality through medical protocols. Social Studies of Science 27: 273–305.CrossRef Google Scholar

Timmermans, Stefan, and Berg, Marc (2003). The gold standard: The challenge of evidence-based medicine and standardization in health care. Philadelphia, PA: Temple University Press.Google Scholar

Traweek, Sharon (1988). Beamtimes and lifetimes: The world of high energy physicists. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar

Trigg, Randall, Blomberg, Jeanette, and Suchman, Lucy (1999). Moving document collections online. In Proceedings of the Sixth European Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work (ECSCW): (pp. 331–350). Copenhagen: Kluwer Academic Press.Google Scholar

Turing, Alan (1950). Computing machinery and intelligence. Mind 59(236): 433–461.CrossRef Google Scholar

Turkle, Sherry (1984). The second self: Computers and the human spirit. New York: Simon & Schuster.Google Scholar

Turkle, Sherry (1995). Life on the screen: Identity in the age of the Internet. New York/Toronto: Simon & Schuster.Google Scholar

Turnbull, David (1990). Mapping the world in the mind: A case study of the unwritten knowledge of the micronesian navigators. Deakin University School of Humanities. Geelong: Deakin University Press.Google Scholar

Turnbull, David (1993). Maps are territories, science is an atlas: A portfolio of exhibits. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar

Turnbull, David (2000). Masons, tricksters and cartographers: Comparative studies in the sociology of scientific and indigenous knowledge. Amsterdam: Harwood Academic.CrossRef Google Scholar

Turner, Ralph (1962). Words, utterances and activities. In Ethnomethodology: Selected readings (pp. 197–215). Harmondsworth, Middlesex: Penguin.Google Scholar

Tylor, Edward (1875). Primitive culture. London: Murray.Google Scholar

Varela, Francisco, Thompson, Evan, and Rosch, Eleanor (1991). The embodied mind: Cognitive science and human experience. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar

Vera, Alonso (2003). By the seat of our pants: The evolution of research on cognition and action. The Journal of the Learning Sciences 12(2): 279–284.CrossRef Google Scholar

Vera, Alonso, and Simon, Herbert (1993). Situated action: A symbolic interpretation. Cognitive Science 17(1): 7–48.CrossRef Google Scholar

Verran, Helen (1998). Re-imagining land ownership in Australia. Postcolonial Studies 1: 237–254.CrossRef Google Scholar

Verran, Helen (2001). Science and an African logic. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar

Viseu, Ana (2003). Simulation and augmentation: Issues of wearable computers. Ethics and Information Technology 5: 17–26.CrossRef Google Scholar

Viseu, Ana (2005). Augmented bodies: The visions and realities of wearable computers. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Ontario Institute for Studies in Education, University of Toronto.

Wakeford, Nina (2000). Gender and the landscapes of computing in an Internet cafe. In G. Kirkup, L. Janes, K. Woodward, and F. Hovenden (eds.), The gendered cyborg (pp. 291–304). London/New York: Routledge.Google Scholar

Watt, W. C. (1968). Habitability. American Documentation 19(3): 338–351.CrossRef Google Scholar

Wei, Sha Xin (2002). Resistance is fertile: Gesture and agency in the field of responsive media. Configurations 10: 439–472.CrossRef Google Scholar

Weizenbaum, Joseph (1983). eliza: A computer program for the study of natural language communication between man and machine. Communications of the ACM, 25th Anniversary Issue 29(1): 23–27. (Reprinted from Communications of the ACM 26(1): 36–45, January 1966).

Wells, Gordon (2003). Lesson plans and situated learning-and-teaching. The Journal of the Learning Sciences 12(2): 265–272.CrossRef Google Scholar

Wenger, Etienne (1987). Artificial intelligence and tutoring systems: Computational and cognitive approaches to the communication of knowledge. Los Altos, CA: Morgan Kaufmann.Google Scholar

Wilkinson, Barry (1983). The shopfloor politics of new technology. London: Heinemann.Google Scholar

Wilson, Thomas (1970). Conceptions of interaction and forms of sociological explanation. American Sociological Review 35: 697–709.CrossRef Google Scholar

Winograd, Terry, and Flores, Fernando (1986). Understanding computers and cognition: A new foundation for design. Norwood, NJ: Ablex.Google Scholar

Wise, J. Macgregor (1998). Intelligent agency. Cultural Studies 12: 410–428.CrossRef Google Scholar

Wodehouse, P. G. (1999/1923). The inimitable Jeeves. Harmondsworth, UK: Penguin.Google Scholar

Wolmark, Jenny (ed.). (1999). Cybersexualities: A reader on feminist theory, cyborgs and cyberspace. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.Google Scholar

Wood, Gaby (2002). Living dolls: A magical history of the quest for mechanical life. London: Faber & Faber.Google Scholar

Woolf, Beverly and McDonald, David (1983). Human–computer discourse in the design of a PASCAL tutor. Proceedings of the ACM CHI 83 Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (pp. 230–234). New York: ACM Press.

Woolgar, Steve (1991). Configuring the user: The case of usability trials. In J. Law (ed.), A sociology of monsters: Essays on power, technology and domination. London: Routledge.Google Scholar

Yates, JoAnne (1989). Control through communication: The rise of system in American management. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar

Zimmerman, Donald (1970). The practicalities of rule use. In J. Douglas (ed.)., Understanding everyday life (pp. 221–238). Chicago, IL: Aldine.Google Scholar

Zuboff, Shoshana (1988). In the age of the smart machine: The future of work and power. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar