Book contents
- Frontmatter
- Contents
- List of maps
- Notes on contributors
- Acknowledgements
- List of abbreviations
- 1 Towards a history of humanitarian intervention
- Part I Early modern precedents
- Part II The Great Powers and the Ottoman Empire
- 5 ‘From an umpire to a competitor’: Castlereagh, Canning and the issue of international intervention in the wake of the Napoleonic Wars
- 6 Intervening in the Jewish question, 1840–1878
- 7 The ‘principles of humanity’ and the European powers' intervention in Ottoman Lebanon and Syria in 1860–1861
- 8 The guarantees of humanity: the Concert of Europe and the origins of the Russo–Ottoman War of 1877
- 9 The European powers' intervention in Macedonia, 1903–1908: an instance of humanitarian intervention?
- Part III Intervening in Africa
- Part IV Non-European states
- Part V Postscript
- Index
6 - Intervening in the Jewish question, 1840–1878
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 18 April 2011
- Frontmatter
- Contents
- List of maps
- Notes on contributors
- Acknowledgements
- List of abbreviations
- 1 Towards a history of humanitarian intervention
- Part I Early modern precedents
- Part II The Great Powers and the Ottoman Empire
- 5 ‘From an umpire to a competitor’: Castlereagh, Canning and the issue of international intervention in the wake of the Napoleonic Wars
- 6 Intervening in the Jewish question, 1840–1878
- 7 The ‘principles of humanity’ and the European powers' intervention in Ottoman Lebanon and Syria in 1860–1861
- 8 The guarantees of humanity: the Concert of Europe and the origins of the Russo–Ottoman War of 1877
- 9 The European powers' intervention in Macedonia, 1903–1908: an instance of humanitarian intervention?
- Part III Intervening in Africa
- Part IV Non-European states
- Part V Postscript
- Index
Summary
I cannot subscribe to the doctrine that the humanitarian treatment of the Jews in the Principalities is not a subject for foreign interference. The peculiar position of the Jews places them under the protection of the civilised world.
J. Green, British Consul-General in Bucharest to Stefan Golescu, Romanian Foreign Minister, 2 August 1867The Jews were a test case for humanitarian intervention in the nineteenth century, but the story of Great Power intervention in the Jewish Question has received little attention from historians. With a few notable exceptions, those working in Jewish studies have neglected international politics in favour of social and cultural history. Those working outside Jewish studies have not grasped the relevance of this story to broader humanitarian initiatives. Yet the Jewish story matters because this is an early example of intervention on behalf of a group who (unlike Greeks or Syrian Christians) were not ‘people like us’. Great Power intervention in the Jewish Question may have been diplomatic rather than military, but it shaped the legal and political context in which Jews lived in the Middle East, North Africa and the Balkans. As a result the balance between interest and ideology is different. By lobbying for diplomatic intervention in the name of ‘humanity’ and ‘civilisation’, Jewish activists helped create a context in which the treatment of religious and ethnic minorities became a precondition of acceptance into an international state system that was increasingly governed by Western norms.
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- Humanitarian InterventionA History, pp. 139 - 158Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2011
- 2
- Cited by