Book contents
- Frontmatter
- Contents
- List of Illustrations
- Acknowledgements
- List of Kings
- Introduction: Why Animals and the Hunt?
- 1 Wild Beasts on a Premodern Peninsula
- 2 Koryŏ and the Empire of the Hunt
- 3 Growth, Transformation and Challenge in the Late Fourteenth and Early Fifteenth Centuries
- 4 Confucian Beasts: Human–Animal Relations in Early Chosŏn
- 5 Stalking the Forests: The Military on the Chase in the Mid-Fifteenth Century
- 6 Challenges to the Royal Military Kangmu Hunt
- 7 Public Animals, Private Hunts and Royal Authority in the Fifteenth Century
- 8 Release the Falcons: A King in a Confucian Court
- 9 Taming Wild Animals and Beastly Monarchs
- Conclusion: Legacies of the Hunt in Politics, Society and Empire
- Bibliography
- Index
4 - Confucian Beasts: Human–Animal Relations in Early Chosŏn
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 04 March 2025
- Frontmatter
- Contents
- List of Illustrations
- Acknowledgements
- List of Kings
- Introduction: Why Animals and the Hunt?
- 1 Wild Beasts on a Premodern Peninsula
- 2 Koryŏ and the Empire of the Hunt
- 3 Growth, Transformation and Challenge in the Late Fourteenth and Early Fifteenth Centuries
- 4 Confucian Beasts: Human–Animal Relations in Early Chosŏn
- 5 Stalking the Forests: The Military on the Chase in the Mid-Fifteenth Century
- 6 Challenges to the Royal Military Kangmu Hunt
- 7 Public Animals, Private Hunts and Royal Authority in the Fifteenth Century
- 8 Release the Falcons: A King in a Confucian Court
- 9 Taming Wild Animals and Beastly Monarchs
- Conclusion: Legacies of the Hunt in Politics, Society and Empire
- Bibliography
- Index
Summary
This chapter first looks at domination of wild beasts through the hunt, a public symbol of monarchical power in the Koryŏ–Mongol era, as it shifted from the responsibility of the king to the responsibility of the bureaucracy. I argue that along with restraining the actions of kings, the state attempted to transform human–animal relations. Animals grew more plentiful in the expanded domain in the north and were increasingly sacrificed on the altars of both the state and private homes, examined in the second half of this chapter. Ritual sacrifice is an important yet often neglected historical analysis. While based on earlier principles of Confucian rites, these rituals took on added meaning in early Chosŏn. Animals, wild and domestic, helped define Chosŏn identity, becoming the blood and bones of the dynasty's political legitimacy. What may seem like dry descriptions of arcane court ritual were, in fact, inseparably tied to highly contentious issues of political power, economic life, and the fate of the dynasty. This chapter explores the consequences of these newly regulated royal hunts on human and animal interactions within state, political and cultural developments of the fifteenth century.
In 1402, the Ministry of Rites (Yejo; 禮曹) submitted the Rules of Hunting to the king. Based on the Book of Rites, officials outlined the Confucian structure of royal state hunting for the Chosŏn Dynasty.
When the Son of Heaven and the feudal lords had no business to attend to, they went on three hunts a year. Not to hunt when there was no special business was irreverent (pulgyŏng; 不敬). To hunt without adhering to hunting ritual was said to waste natural resources recklessly (p’okchin ch’ŏnmul; 暴殄天物). [The ancient classics] also say, ‘There are three kinds of sacrificial animals (samsaeng; 三牲). As for hunting, in conveying filial piety [during the sacrifice], domesticated animals are not as plump (pimi; 肥美) as animals that live in nature. There are many birds and beasts that harm the five crops [rice, millet, soybean, sesame and barley]. [Culling animals that harm these crops] is the reason for the practice of military arts.’
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- Human-Animal Relations and the Hunt in Korea and Northeast Asia , pp. 110 - 137Publisher: Edinburgh University PressPrint publication year: 2023