Book contents
- Frontmatter
- Contents
- Contributors
- Acknowledgments
- Foreword: Are Americans Human? Reflections on the Future of Progressive Politics in the United States
- 1 Paradoxes and Possibilities: Domestic Human Rights Policy in Context
- SECTION I STRUCTURING DEBATES, INSTITUTIONALIZING RIGHTS
- 2 The Yellow Sweatshirt: Human Dignity and Economic Human Rights in Advanced Industrial Democracies
- 3 The U.S. Welfare State: A Battleground for Human Rights
- 4 Drawing Lines in the Sand: Building Economic and Social Rights Norms in the United States
- 5 State and Local Commissions as Sites for Domestic Human Rights Implementation
- SECTION II CHALLENGING PUBLIC/PRIVATE DIVIDES
- SECTION III FROM THE MARGINS TO THE CENTER: MAKING HARMS VISIBLE THROUGH HUMAN RIGHTS FRAMING
- APPENDIX 1 Universal Declaration of Human Rights
- APPENDIX 2 International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights
- APPENDIX 3 International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights
- Index
- References
5 - State and Local Commissions as Sites for Domestic Human Rights Implementation
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 05 June 2012
Book contents
- Frontmatter
- Contents
- Contributors
- Acknowledgments
- Foreword: Are Americans Human? Reflections on the Future of Progressive Politics in the United States
- 1 Paradoxes and Possibilities: Domestic Human Rights Policy in Context
- SECTION I STRUCTURING DEBATES, INSTITUTIONALIZING RIGHTS
- 2 The Yellow Sweatshirt: Human Dignity and Economic Human Rights in Advanced Industrial Democracies
- 3 The U.S. Welfare State: A Battleground for Human Rights
- 4 Drawing Lines in the Sand: Building Economic and Social Rights Norms in the United States
- 5 State and Local Commissions as Sites for Domestic Human Rights Implementation
- SECTION II CHALLENGING PUBLIC/PRIVATE DIVIDES
- SECTION III FROM THE MARGINS TO THE CENTER: MAKING HARMS VISIBLE THROUGH HUMAN RIGHTS FRAMING
- APPENDIX 1 Universal Declaration of Human Rights
- APPENDIX 2 International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights
- APPENDIX 3 International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights
- Index
- References
Summary
States and localities play a critical role in bringing the United States into compliance with its international human rights commitments. The human rights framework embraces the importance of local decision making and implementation, as well as a significant role for subnational incorporation of human rights obligations. Realization of human rights in affected communities requires strong cooperation and collaboration among local, state, and federal governments, and between government and civil society (Melish 2009). Moreover, state and local implementation of human rights may eventually help influence national policy and broader acceptance of international human rights norms (Burroughs 2006, 420–24; Davis 2008a, 436; Powell 2001, 249; Resnik 2006, 1581; Soohoo and Stoltz 2008, 475).
Indeed, human rights treaties are intended to be implemented at the local level with a great deal of democratic input. They provide mechanisms and opportunities for reporting on conditions within communities (both positive and negative), training government officials and agencies as well as the community to promote equality and nondiscrimination, conducting hearings to explore and examine the relevance of findings by international treaty bodies, and issuing recommendations for future action. They also provide a set of standards that local governments should adhere to in administering their own laws and policies.
Subnational implementation of human rights, particularly in areas traditionally reserved for state and local regulation, is also consistent with the U.S. federalist system.
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- Human Rights in the United StatesBeyond Exceptionalism, pp. 89 - 110Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2011
References
(clinical director, Center for International Human Rights at Northwestern Law). 2009. Interview by Joie Chowdhury, February 27.
(member, Berkeley Peace and Justice Commission). 2009. Interview by Erin Smith, July 21.
(former executive director of Washington State Human Rights Commission). 2009. Interview by Sam Yospe, April 19.
. 2006. “More Than an Incidental Effect on Foreign Affairs: Implementation of Human Rights by State and Local Governments.” N.Y.U. Review of Law and Social Change 30: 411, 420–24.Google Scholar
. 1998. Local Implementation of the United Nations Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Discrimination Against Women (CEDAW). Ordinance No. 128–98. Municipal Code, Administrative Code, Chapter 12K. April 13. http://sfgov.org/site/cosw_page.asp?id=10849.
. 2009. “Expression of Support for Convention on the Rights of the Child. Resolution R2009–143.” Journal of the Proceedings of the City Council of the City of Chicago, Illinois, February 11: 55415–16. http://www.chicityclerk.com/journals/2009/feb11_2009/feb11_2009_part3optimize.pdf.Google Scholar
. 2008. Ordinance No. 181670. Creation of the Office of Human Relations and the Human Rights Commission. City Council of the City of Portland, Oregon. March 19. http://www.portlandonline.com/humanrelations/index.cfm?c=50680&a=227365.
. 2009. January 7. “Bylaws: Human Rights Commission.” http://www.portlandonline.com/humanrelations/index.cfm?c=49504&a=227082.
. 2008. “Concluding Observations on the United States of America.” U.N. Doc. CERD/C/USA/CO/6, May 8.
, and (co-coordinators of the Greater Milwaukee Human Rights Coalition). 2009. Interview by Joie Chowdhury, February 22.
. 2008a. “Upstairs, Downstairs: Subnational Incorporation of International Human Rights Law at the End of an Era.” Fordham Law Review 77: 411–38.Google Scholar
. 2008b. “Thinking Globally, Acting Locally: States, Municipalities, and International Human Rights.” In Bringing Human Rights Home, edited by , , and Catherine Albisa, Vol. 2, 127–52. Westport, CT: Praeger Publishers.Google Scholar
. U.S. Code. Title 20, sec. 7131.
(executive director, Meiklejohn Civil Liberties Institute). 2009. Interview by Erin Smith, July 6.
(executive director, Pennsylvania Human Rights Commission). 2009. Interview by Joie Chowdhury, February 25.
. 1995. “U.S. Ratification of Human Rights Conventions: The Ghost of Senator Bricker.” American Journal of International Law 89: 341–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
. U.S. Code. Title 42, sec. 3616.
International Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Racial Discrimination (ICERD), adopted 21 December 1965, 660 U.N.T.S. 195 (entered into force 4 January 1961), G.A. Res. 2106 (XX), 20 GAOR Supp. (No. 14) at 47, U.N. Doc. A/6014 (1965).
(director of the Office of Human Relations of Portland, Oregon). 2009. Interview by Joie Chowdhury, February 20.
(director, Anchorage Equal Rights Commission). 2009. Interview by Sam Yospe, April 6.
(legal advisor, U.S. Department of State). 2010. Letter to State and Local Human Rights Commissioners, May 3.
. 2009. Restoring the Conscience of a Nation. http://www.civilrights.org/publications/reports/commission/lccref_commission_report_march2009.pdf.
(senior CEDAW policy analyst, San Francisco Department on the Status of Women). 2009. Interview by Erin Smith, July 7.
, 128 S. Ct. 1346 (2008).
. 2009. “From Paradox to Subsidiarity: The United States and Human Rights Treaty Bodies.” Yale Journal of International Law 34: 389–462.Google Scholar
(CEDAW policy analyst, San Francisco Department on the Status of Women). 2009. Interview by Erin Smith, June 29.
(director, Seattle Office of Civil Rights). 2009. Interview by Joie Chowdhury, May 27.
(community volunteer, Eugene Human Rights Commission). 2009. Interview by Joie Chowdhury, February 23.
. 2010. Human Rights Government in Operations Audit Law, Int 0283–2010. http://legistar.council.nyc.gov/LegislationDetail.aspx?ID=679918&GUID=960F221E-C810–40E9-AF16–2EC4547ED586&Options=&Search=.
. n.d. “Complaint Form: Report Human Rights Incidents.” Accessed December 8, 2010. http://www.portlandonline.com/humanrelations/index.cfm?a=254809&c=50684.
. 2001. “Dialogic Federalism: Constitutional Possibilities for Incorporation of Human Rights Law in the United States.” University of Pennsylvania Law Review 150: 245–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
. 2008. Human Rights at Home: A Domestic Policy Blueprint for the New Administration. American Constitution Society for Law and Policy. http://www.acslaw.org/files/C%20Powell%20Blueprint.pdf.Google Scholar
. 2006. “Law's Migration: American Exceptionalism and Federalism's Multiple Ports of Entry.” Yale Law Journal 115: 1564–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, , and . 2008. “Ratifying Kyoto at the Local Level: Sovereigntism, Federalism, and Translocal Organizations of Government Actors (TOGAs).” Arizona Law Review 50(3): 709–86.Google Scholar
., and . 2007. “A Historical Perspective on U.S. Human Rights Commissions.” Executive Session Papers, Human Rights Commissions and Criminal Justice, No. 3. http://www.hrccj.org/hrccj/pdfs/history_of_hrc.pdf.
(commissioner, Seattle Human Rights Commission). 2009. Interviews by Joie Chowdhury, May 27.
(executive director, LA County Human Relations Commission). 2009. Interview by Joie Chowdhury, April 13.
. 1993. “National Institutions for the Promotion and Protection of Human Rights” (Paris Principles). G.A. Res 48/134 (Dec. 20).
. Congressional Record Daily. 1990. 101st Cong., 2d sess. Vol. 136, no. 150 (October 27): S17486.
. Congressional Record. 1992. 102d Cong., 2d sess. Vol. 138, pt. 6: 8071.
. Congressional Record. 1994. 103d Cong., 2d sess. Vol. 140, pt. 10: 14326.
. Congressional Record Daily. 1994. 103d Cong., 2d sess. Vol. 140, no. 82 (June 24): S7634–02.
. 2007. Farm Worker Housing and the Washington Law Against Discrimination. Briefing Paper. http://content.knowledgeplex.org/kp2/cache/documents/17830/1783061.pdf.
. 2006. Making Rights Real: A Workbook for Local Implementation. http://wildforhumanrights.org/publications/rightsreal/.
. 2008. Respect, Protect, Fulfill: Raising the Bar on Women's Rights in San Francisco. http://www.wildforhumanrights.org/documents/resources/respectprotect.pdf.
- 2
- Cited by