Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-55f67697df-jr75m Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-05-08T08:39:31.966Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

10 - Prodigals and Projectors: An Economic History of Usury Laws in the United States from Colonial Times to 1900

from PART IV - CONSTRAINTS IN LABOR AND FINANCIAL MARKETS

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  22 December 2009

By
Hugh Rockoff
Edited by
David Eltis ,
Frank D. Lewis  and
Kenneth L. Sokoloff
David Eltis
Affiliation:
Emory University, Atlanta
Frank D. Lewis
Affiliation:
Queen's University at Kingston, Canada
Kenneth L. Sokoloff
Affiliation:
University of California, Los Angeles
Get access

Summary

WHY SHOULD ECONOMIC HISTORIANS STUDY USURY LAWS?

With a few notable exceptions, such as Friedman (1963) and Glaeser and Scheinkman (1998), historians and economists writing about the financial history of the United States have ignored usury laws. Many of the classic financial histories of the United States do not even mention them. Yet there are several good reasons for studying usury laws. For one thing usury laws have been, arguably, the most common form of economic regulation. Usury is mentioned in the Bible and the Koran. There were usury laws in ancient Rome, although not in classical Athens (Finley 1953). And, the medieval canonists developed a detailed theory of usury. Usury laws have not been confined to countries influenced by European cultural traditions. In India, during the Buddhist period, it was recommended that interest be limited to 15 percent per year on secured loans and to 60 percent per year on unsecured loans (Seth 1955, 6). In traditional China the maximum rate was 3 percent per month, and the penalty for charging more was 40 to 100 blows with the light cane (Alabaster 1899, 550–51). Usury laws, moreover, have been the subject of classic works of literature, such as The Merchant of Venice. The usury laws in England were repealed in 1854 (although legislation protecting borrowers was reinstated at the turn of the century), but in the United States they were continued in many U.S. states down to the present day.

Type
Chapter
Information
Human Capital and Institutions
A Long-Run View
 , pp. 285 - 324
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2009

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Book purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Alabaster, Ernest. 1899. Notes and Commentaries on Chinese Criminal Law, and Cognate Topics. London: Luzac & Co.Google Scholar
Bentham, Jeremy. 1952–54. Jeremy Bentham's Economic Writings. Critical edition based on his printed works and unprinted mss., ed. Stark, W.. London: Allen & Unwin, for the Royal Economic Society.Google Scholar
Blitz, Rudolph C., and Long, Millard F.. 1965. “The Economics of Usury Regulation.” Journal of Political Economy 73 (Dec.): 608–619.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bodenhorn, Howard, and Rockoff, Hugh. 1992. “Regional Interest Rates in Antebellum America.” In Strategic Factors in Nineteenth Century American Economic History: A Volume to Honor Robert W. Fogel, eds. Goldin, Claudia and Rockoff, Hugh. Chicago: University of Chicago Press for the NBER, pp. 159–87.Google Scholar
Clapham, Sir John. 1970. The Bank of England: A History. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Child, Josiah. 1668. Brief Observations Concerning Trade and Interest of Money. London: Printed for Elizabeth Calvert at the Black-spread Eagle in Barbican, and Henry Mortlock at the Sign of the White-Heart in Westminster Hall. [McMaster University Archive for the History of Economic Thought, http://socserv2.socsci.mcmaster.ca:80/~econ/ugcm/3ll3/index.html].Google Scholar
Cunningham, William. 1905–07. The Growth of English Industry and Commerce. 4th ed. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Jr, Dana Richard H., Wells, David A., and others. 1881. Usury laws: Their Nature, Expediency, and Influence. New York: The Society for Political Education.Google Scholar
Davis, Andrew McFarland. 1910. The Origin of the National Banking System. Washington, DC: GPO.Google Scholar
Davis, Lance E. 1960. “The New England Textile Mills and the Capital Markets: A Study of Industrial Borrowing 1840–1860.” Journal of Economic History 20 (March): 1–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Davis, Lance E. 1965. “The Investment Market, 1870–1914: The Evolution of a National Market.” Journal of Economic History 25 (Sep.): 355–99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dorfman, Joseph. 1946. The Economic Mind in American Civilization. Volume 2, 1606–1865. New York: Viking Press.Google Scholar
Eichengreen, Barry. 1984. “Mortgage Interest Rates in the Populist Era.” American Economic Review 74 (Dec.): 995–1015.Google Scholar
Eichengreen, Barry. 1987. “Agricultural Mortgages in the Populist Era: Reply to Snowden.” Journal of Economic History 47 (Sep.): 757–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Engerman, Stanley L., and Sokoloff, Kenneth L.. 2005. “The Evolution of Suffrage Institutions in the New World.” Journal of Economic History 65 (Dec.): 891–921.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Farnam, Henry W. 1938. Chapters in the History of Social Legislation in the United States to 1860, ed. Clive, Day. Washington, DC: Carnegie Institution of Washington.Google Scholar
Finley, M. I. 1953. “Land, Debt, and the Man of Property in Classical Athens.” Political Science Quarterly 68 (June): 249–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Friedman, Lawrence M. 1963. “The Usury Laws of Wisconsin: A Study in Legal and Social History.” Wisconsin Law Review (July): 515–65.Google Scholar
George, Charles H. 1957. “English Calvinist Opinion on Usury, 1600–1640.” Journal of the History of Ideas 18 (Oct.): 455–474.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Glaeser, Edward L., and Scheinkman, Jose. 1998. “Neither a Borrower nor a Lender Be: An Economic Analysis of Interest Restrictions and Usury Laws.” Journal of Law and Economics 41 (April): 1–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hammond, Bray. 1970. Sovereignty and an Empty Purse: Banks and Politics in the Civil War. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Harding, William F. 1895. “The State Bank of Indiana.” Journal of Political Economy 4 (Dec.): 1–36; “Appendix: Tables Relating to the State Bank of Indiana,” 109–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Holdsworth, William Searle. 1903. A History of English Law. London: Methuen.Google Scholar
Holmes, George K. 1892. “Usury in Law, in Practice and in Psychology.” Political Science Quarterly (Sep.): 431–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Holmes, George K., and Lord, John S.. 1895. “Report on real estate mortgages in the United States at the eleventh census, 1890.” Reports of the eleventh census of the United States, 1890, vs. 12. Washington, DC: G.P.O.Google Scholar
Horwitz, Morton J. 1977. The Transformation of American Law: 1780–1860. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Huntington, C.C. 1915. “A History of Banking and Currency in Ohio before the Civil War.” Ohio Archaeological and Historical Publications XXIV: 442–50.Google Scholar
Jadlow, Joseph M. 1977. “Adam Smith on Usury Laws.” Journal of Finance 32 (Sep.): 1195–200.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jones, Norman L. 1989. God and the Money Lenders: Usury and the Law in Early Modern England. Oxford, UK: Basil Blackwell.Google Scholar
Ketchum, Hiram, Jr. 1863. “The Usury Laws and the National Banking System.” Bankers Magazine, New Series, 12: 161–66.Google Scholar
Keynes, John Maynard. 1965 [1936]. The General Theory of Employment, Interest, and Money. New York: Harcourt, Brace & World.Google Scholar
Kirkland, Frazar. 1865. Cyclopedia of Commercial and Business Anecdotes. New York: D. Appleton.Google Scholar
Kish-Goodling, Donna M. 1998. “Using the Merchant of Venice in Teaching Monetary Economics.” Journal of Economic Education 29 (Fall): 330–39.Google Scholar
Krooss, Herman E. 1969. Documentary History of Banking and Currency in the United States. 4 volumes. New York: Chelsea House.Google Scholar
Levi, Peter. 1988. The Life and Times of William Shakespeare. New York: Random House.Google Scholar
Marshall, Alfred. 1961. Principles of Economics. 9th (variorum), ed. Guillebaud, C. W.. London, New York: Macmillan for the Royal Economic Society.Google Scholar
Mill, John Stuart. Principles of Political Economy, edited by Ashley, W. J.. London: Longman's Green and Co., 1940. The first edition appeared in 1848; the seventh edition, the last revised by Mill, was published in 1871.Google Scholar
Miller, Harry E. 1924. “Earlier Theories of Crises and Cycles in the United States.” Quarterly Journal of Economics 38 (Feb.): 294–329.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Munro, John. 2001. “The Origins of the Modern Financial Revolution: Responses to Impediments from Church and State in Western Europe, 1200–1600>.” University of Toronto, Department of Economics, Working Paper, 2001–02.
Nelson, Benjamin. 1969. The Idea of Usury: From Tribal Brotherhood to Universal Otherhood. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Noonan, John T. 1957. The Scholastic Analysis of Usury. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Oberholtzer, Ellis Paxson. 1907. Jay Cooke: Financier of the Civil War. Philadelphia: George W. Jacobs.Google Scholar
Paganelli, Maria Pia. 2003. “In Medio Stat Virtus: An Alternative View of Usury in Adam Smith's Thinking.” History of Political Economy 35 (Spring): 21–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pressnell, Leslie S. 1956. Country Banking in the Industrial Revolution. Oxford, UK: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Redlich, Fritz. 1947–51. The Molding of American Banking: Men and Ideas. New York: Hafner.Google Scholar
Rezneck, Samuel. 1950. “Distress, Relief, and Discontent in the United States during the Depression of 1873–78.” Journal of Political Economy 58 (Dec.): 494–512.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Robinson, Louis Newton, and Nugent, Rolf. 1935. Regulation of the Small Loan Business. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.Google Scholar
Romano, MaryFlorence, Ann. 1989. Law, Politics, and the Economy: Changing Patterns of Growth in Debtor-Creditor Laws, New York State, 1785–1860. PhD dissertation, New York University.Google Scholar
Ryan, Franklin Winton. 1924. Usury and Usury Laws: A Juristic-Economic Study of the Effects of State Statutory Maximums for Loan Charges upon Lending Operations in the United States. Boston and New York: Houghton Mifflin.Google Scholar
Seth, M. L. 1955. “Indian Money-Lender in Pre-British Times.” The Research Bulletin (Arts), University of Panjab (Nov.), XV Economics I. Hoshiarpur, India: Vishveshvaranand Book Agency.Google Scholar
Smith, Adam. 1979 [1776]. An Enquiry Into the Nature and Causes of the Wealth of Nations. Glasgow edition of the Works of Smith, Adam, general eds. Campbell, R. H. and Skinner, A. S.. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Snowden, Kenneth A. 1987. “Mortgage Rates and American Capital Market Development in the Late Nineteenth Century.” Journal of Economic History 47 (Sep.): 671–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Snowden, Kenneth A. 1988. “Mortgage Lending and American Urbanization, 1880–1890.” Journal of Economic History 48 (June): 273–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Steuart, Sir James. 1998 [1767]. Inquiry into the Principles of Political Oeconomy, edited by Skinner, Andrew; contributing editors, Kobayashi, Noboru and Mizuta, Hiroshi. Brookfield, VT: Pickering & Chatto.Google Scholar
Stiglitz, Joseph E., and Weiss, Andrew. 1981. “Credit Rationing in Markets with Imperfect Information.” American Economic Review 71 (June): 393–410.Google Scholar
Taeusch, Carl F. 1942. “The Concept of ‘Usury’: the History of an Idea.” Journal of the History of Ideas 3 (June): 291–318.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tan, Elaine S. 2002. “An Empty Shell? Rethinking the Usury Laws in Medieval Europe.” Journal of Legal History 23 (Dec.): 77–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tawney, R.H. 1925. “Introduction” to A Discourse Upon Usury by Way of Dialogue and Orations by Wilson, Thomas (1572), 1–172. New York: Harcourt Brace.Google Scholar
Thomas, David L., and Evans, Norman E.. 1984. “John Shakespeare in the Exchequer.” Shakespeare Quarterly 35 (Autumn): 315–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
,U.S. Bureau of the Census. 1975. Historical Statistics of the United States, Colonial Times to 1970. Bicentennial Edition. Washington, DC: Government Printing Office.Google Scholar
,U.S. Comptroller of the Currency. 1864. Annual Report.
Washington, George. 1797. “Letter to George Ball, May 7.” The George Washington Papers at the Library of Congress, http://memory.loc.gov/ammem/gwhtml/gwhome.html.
White, Eugene N. 2001. “California Banking in the Nineteenth Century: The Art and Method of the Bank of A. Levy.” Business History Review 75 (Summer): 297–324.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wright, Robert E. 2001. A Financial Interpretation of Early U.S. History. Mimeo, University of Virginia.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure [email protected] is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×