Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-mlc7c Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-09T05:31:14.439Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

12 - Managing attention in the social web: the AtGentNet approach

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  04 February 2011

By
Thierry Nabeth  and
Nicolas Maisonneuve
Edited by
Claudia Roda
Claudia Roda
Affiliation:
The American University of Paris, France
Get access

Summary

By transforming the Web into a massive social space, Web 2.0 has opened a vast set of opportunities for people to interact with one another using online social networking, blogs, wikis or social bookmarking. But at the same time such a phenomenon has created the conditions for a massive social interaction overload: people are being overwhelmed by solicitations and opportunities to engage in social exchange but they have few means by which to deal effectively with this new level of interaction. The objective of this chapter is to investigate the use of ICT (information and communication technologies) to support online social interactions in a more attention-effective way. This is achieved by adapting to a social context a general model (Roda and Nabeth 2008) which defines four levels of attention support: perception, deliberation, operation and metacognition. We then describe how the support of social attention has been operationalized with the implementation of the attention-aware social platform AtGentNet, and tested in the context of communities of learners and professionals. After discussing the results of the experimentation, this chapter concludes by reflecting on how this approach can be generalized to support the interaction of people in the social web in general.

Introduction: addressing the social interaction overload

The social web, an essential component of the Web 2.0 vision, which refers to the use of the Internet for facilitating online social activities (Chi 2008), has totally reinvented the Web as a massive participatory social space.

Type
Chapter
Information
Human Attention in Digital Environments , pp. 281 - 310
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2011

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Angehrn, A. A., and Nabeth, T. 2006. The L2C project: Learning to collaborate through advanced SmallWorld simulations, in Proceedings of the 1st European Technology Enhanced Learning Conference, 1–4 October 2006, Crete: 452–7Google Scholar
Anicic, D., Stojanovic, N., and Apostolou, D. 2008. Enterprise attention management system, in Hepp, M., Stojanovic, N., Hinkelmann, K., Karagiannis, D., and Klein, R. (eds.), Proceedings of the 3rd International Workshop on Semantic Business Process Management (SBPM 2008) in conjunction with the 4th European Semantic Web Conference (ESWC 2008), Tenerife, 2 June 2008Google Scholar
Anjewierden, A., and Efimova, L. 2006. Understanding weblog communities through digital traces: A framework, a tool and an example, in R. Meersman et al. (eds.), On the Move to Meaningful Internet Systems 2006: OTM 2006 Workshops, Montpellier: 279–89
Argyris, C., and Schon, D. 1978. Organizational Learning: A Theory of Action Perspective. Reading, MA: Addison-WesleyGoogle Scholar
Ashkenas, R. 2007. Simplicity-minded management: A practical guide to stripping complexity out of your organization, Harvard Business Review 85(12): 101–9Google ScholarPubMed
Bandura, A. 1994. Self-efficacy, in Ramachaudran, V. S. (ed.), Encyclopedia of Human Behavior. New York: Academic Press: vol. IV: 71–81Google Scholar
Bandura, A. 2001. Social cognitive theory: An agentic perspective, Annual Review of Psychology 52: 1–26CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Beck, J. C., and Davenport, T. H. 2001. How corporate leaders can help their companies manage the scarcest resource of all: Attention; Accenture point of view, August 2001. Retrieved 20 November 2008 from: www.accenture.com/Global/Research_and_Insights/Outlook/By_Alphabet/HowAttention.htm
Bier, E. A., Stone, M. C., Pier, K., Buxton, W., and DeRose, T. D. 1993. Toolglass and magic lenses: The see-through interface, in Proceedings 20th Annual Conference on Computer Graphics and Interactive Techniques, Anaheim: 73–80
Boyd, D., and Ellison, N. 2007. Social network sites: Definition, history, and scholarship, Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication 13(1): article 11CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bridges, K. 2008. Librarians and the attention economy; Library Philosophy and Practice, March 2008. Retrieved 19 November 2008 from: http://libr.unl.edu:2000/LPP/bridges3.htm
Burt, R. 1997. The contingent value of social capital, Administrative Science Quarterly 42(2): 339–65CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chi, E. H. 2008. The social web: Research and opportunities, IEEE Computer 41(9): 88–91CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chi, E. H., Pirolli, P., and Lam, S. K. 2007. Aspects of augmented social cognition: Social information foraging and social search, in Proceedings Human–Computer Interaction International Conference, Beijing: 60–9
Chi, E. H., Pirolli, P., Suh, B., Kittur, A., Pendleton, B., and Mytkowicz, T. 2008. Augmented social cognition, in Proceedings of the AAAI Spring Symposium on Social Information Processing, Stanford University, 26 March 2008. AAAI PressGoogle Scholar
Clark, H., and Brennan, S. 1991. Grounding in communication, in Resnick, B., Levine, S. and Teasley, S. (eds.), Perspectives on Socially Shared Cognition. Washington, DC: APA: 127–49Google Scholar
Cross, R., Borgatti, S. P., and Parker, A. 2002. Making invisible work visible: Using social network analysis to support strategic collaboration, California Management Review 44(2): 25–46CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cunningham, W., and Leuf, B. 2001. The Wiki Way. Quick Collaboration on the Web. Reading, MA: Addison-WesleyGoogle Scholar
Davenport, T. H., and Beck, J. 2001. The Attention Economy. Harvard Business School PressGoogle Scholar
Dieberger, A., Dourish, P., Höök, K., Resnick, P., and Wexelblat, A. 2000. Social navigation: Techniques for building more usable systems, Interactions 7(6): 36–45CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Drucker, P. F. 1999. Knowledge worker productivity: The biggest challenge, California Management Review 1(2): 79–94CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dunbar, R. 1992. Neocortex size as a constraint on group size in primates, Journal of Human Evolution 20: 469–93CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Erickson, T. 2009. ‘Social’ systems: Designing digital systems that support social intelligence, AI & Society 23(2): 147–66CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Erickson, T., and Kellogg, W. A. 2000. Social translucence: An approach to designing systems that support social processes, ACM Transactions on Computer–Human Interaction 7(1): 59–83CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Erickson, T., and Kellogg, W. A. 2003. Social translucence: Using minimalist visualizations of social activity to support collective interaction, in Höök, K., Benyon, D. and Munro, A. (eds.), Designing Information Spaces: The Social Navigation Approach. Berlin: Springer: 17–42CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fielding, R. T., and Taylor, R. N. 2002. Principled design of the modern web architecture, ACM Transactions on Internet Technology 2(2): 115–50CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gifford, S. 1997. Limited attention and the role of the venture capitalist, Journal of Business Venturing 12(6): 459–82CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gill, K. E. 2005. Blogging, RSS and the information landscape: A look at online news, in Proceedings WWW 2005, Chiba, JapanGoogle Scholar
Giraldeau, L.-A., and Caraco, T. 2000. Social Foraging Theory. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University PressGoogle Scholar
Golder, S., and Huberman, B. A. 2006. Usage patterns of collaborative tagging systems, Journal of Information Science 32(2): 198–208CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goldhaber, M. H. 1997. The attention economy and the net, First Monday 2(4)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Granovetter, M. 1973. The strength of weak ties, American Journal of Sociology 78(6): 1360–80CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Halpin, H., Robu, V., and Shepherd, H. 2006. The dynamics and semantics of collaborative tagging, in K. Möller, A. de Waard, S. Cayzer, M.-R. Koivunen, M. Sintek and S. Handschuh, SAAW'06, CEUR Workshop Proceedings, Atlanta
Harper, M., Li, X., Chen, Y., and Konstan, J. 2007. Social comparisons to motivate contributions to an online community, Persuasive Technology Conference, Palo Alto, CAGoogle Scholar
Homans, G. C. 1958. Social behavior as exchange, American Journal of Sociology 63: 597–606CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Huberman, B. A., Romero, D. M., and Wu, F. 2009a. Crowdsourcing, attention and productivity, Journal of Information Science 35(6): 758–65
Huberman, B. A., Romero, D. M., and Wu, F. 2009b. Social networks that matter: Twitter under the microscope, First Monday 14(1)
Huberman, B. A., and Wu, F. 2007. Comparative advantage and efficient advertising in the attention economy, Proceedings of the 22nd European Conference on Operational Research (EURO XXII)
Huberman, B. A., and Wu, F. 2008. The economics of attention: Maximizing user value in information-rich environments, Advances in Complex Systems 11(4): 487–96CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Joinson, A. N. 2008. Looking at, looking up or keeping up with people? Motives and use of Facebook, in Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, Florence: 1027–36
Kogut, B. 2008. Knowledge, Options and Institutions. Oxford: Oxford University PressGoogle Scholar
Latour, B. 2007. Beware, your imagination leaves digital traces, Times Higher Literary Supplement, 6 April 2007
Marlow, C., Naaman, M., Boyd, D., and Davis, M. 2006. Position paper, tagging, taxonomy, Flickr, Article, ToRead, Collaborative Web Tagging Workshop, in Proceedings WWW 2006, Edinburgh, 22 May 2006
May, M., George, S., and Prévôt, P. 2008. A closer look at tracking human and computer interactions in web-based communications, International Journal of Interactive Technology and Smart Education (ITSE) 5(3): 170–88CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McAfee, A. P. 2006. Enterprise 2.0: The dawn of emergent collaboration, Sloan Management Review 47(3): 21–8Google Scholar
Miller, G. 1956. The magical number seven, plus or minus two, Psychological Review 63: 81–97CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mobasher, B. 2007. Data mining for web personalization, in Brusilovsky, P., Kobsa, A. and Nejdl, W. (eds.), The Adaptive Web: Methods and Strategies of Web Personalization. Berlin: Springer: 90–135CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nabeth, T. 2008. User profiling for attention support for school and work, in Hildebrandt, M. and Gutwirth, S. (eds.), Profiling the European Citizen. Dordrecht: Springer: 185–200Google Scholar
Nabeth, T., Karlsson, H., Angehrn, A., and Maisonneuve, N. 2008. A social network platform for vocational learning in the ITM worldwide network, IST Africa 2008, Windhoek, Namibia, 14–16 May 2008
Nabeth, T., and Roda, C. 2006. Les espaces sociaux virtuels: Approches, pratiques émergentes et perspectives, in A. Bounfour (ed.), Capital Immatériel, Connaissance et Performance. Paris: L'Harmattan: 225–65
Nabeth, T., Roda, C., Angehrn, A., and Mittal, P. K. 2005. Using artificial agents to stimulate participation in virtual communities, in Proceedings of the IADIS International Conference CELDA (Cognition and Exploratory Learning in Digital Age), Porto: 391–4
Nardi, S. W., Whittaker, S., and Schwarz, H. 2000. It's not what you know, it's who you know: Work in the information age, First Monday 5(5)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nishikant, K., Konstan, J., and Terveen, L. 2005. How peer photos influence member participation in online communities, in Proceedings ACM CHI 2005, Portland, OR, 2–7 April 2005: 1525–8
Ocasio, W. 1993. The structuring of organizational attention and the enactment of economic adversity: A reconciliation of theories of failure-induced change and threat-rigidity, Working Paper (Sloan School of Management), Retrieved 20 November 2008 from: http://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/2473: 3577–93
Ocasio, W. 1997. Towards an attention-based view of the firm, Strategic Management Journal 18: 187–2063.3.CO;2-B>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
O'Reilly, T. 2005. What is Web 2.0? Design patterns and business models for the next generation of software, Retrieved 30 September 2005 from: www.oreillynet.com/pub/a/oreilly/tim/news/2005/09/30/what-is-web-20.html
Perez, S. 2008. Real people don't have time for social media, ReadWriteWeb, Retrieved 16 April 2008 from: www.readwriteweb.com/archives/real_people_dont_have_time_for_social_media.php
Pierrakos, D., Paliouras, G., Papatheodorou, C., and Spyropoulos, C. D. 2003. Web usage mining as a tool for personalization: A survey, User Modeling and User-Adapted Interaction 13: 311–72CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rashid, A. M., Ling, K., Tassone, R. D., Resnick, P., Kraut, R., and Riedl, J. 2006. Motivating participation by displaying the value of contribution, in CHI '06: Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. New York: ACM Press: 955–8CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Resnick, P., Zeckhauser, R., Friedman, E., and Kuwabara, K. 2000. Reputation systems, Communications of the ACM 43(12): 45–8CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Roda, C., and Nabeth, T. 2006. Poster: The AtGentive project: Attentive agents for collaborative learners, in Proceedings ECTEL 2006, First European Technology Enhanced Learning Conference, Crete, 1–4 October 2006
Roda, C., and Nabeth, T. 2008. Attention management in organizations: Four levels of support in information systems, in Bounfour, A. (ed.), Innovation and Information Systems. Routledge: 214–33Google Scholar
Rogers, E. 2003. Diffusion of Innovations (5th edn). New York: Free PressGoogle Scholar
Rudman, P., and Zajicek, M. 2007. Final evaluation report, AtGentive Project, Deliverable D4.4. Retrieved 9 July 2010 from: www.calt.insead.edu/LivingLab/AtGentive/Wiki/?D4.4
Senge, P. 1990. The Fifth Discipline: The Art and Practice of the Learning Organization. New York: DoubledayGoogle Scholar
Simon, H. A. 1971. Designing organizations for an information rich world, in Greenberger, M. (ed.), Computers, Communications and the Public Interest. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins Press: 38–52Google Scholar
Stone, L. 2006. Linda Stone's thoughts on attention and specifically, continuous partial attention. Retrieved 20 November 2008 from: http://continuouspartialattention.jot.com/WikiHome
Subramani, M. R., and Rajagopalan, B. 2003. Knowledge-sharing and influence in online social networks via viral marketing, Communications of the ACM 46(12): 300–7CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tapscott, D., and Williams, A. D. 2007. Wikinomics: How Mass Collaboration Changes Everything. New York: PenguinGoogle Scholar
Thibaut, J. W., and Kelley, H. H. 1959. The Social Psychology of Groups. New York: WileyGoogle Scholar
Thomas, J. C., Kellogg, W. A., and Erickson, T. 2001. The knowledge management puzzle: Human and social factors in knowledge management, IBM System Journal 40(4): 863–84CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tufekci, Z. 2008. Can you see me now? Audience and disclosure management in online social network sites, Bulletin of Science, Technology and Society 11(4): 544–64
Vassileva, J., and Sun, L. 2007. Using community visualization to stimulate participation in online communities, e-Service Journal 6(1): 3–40CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vertegaal, R. 2003. Attentive user interfaces, Communications of the ACM 46(3): 30–3CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vertegaal, R., Shell, J. S., Chen, D., and Mamuji, A. 2006. Designing for augmented attention: Towards a framework for attentive user interfaces, Computers in Human Behavior 22(4): 771–89CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weiss, A. 2005. The power of collective intelligence, netWorker 9(3): 16–23Google Scholar
Wolpers, M., Najjar, J., Verbert, K., and Duval, E. 2007. Tracking actual usage: The attention metadata approach, Educational Technology and Society 10(3): 106–21Google Scholar
Wu, F., and Huberman, B. A. 2008. Popularity, novelty and attention, in Proceedings of the 9th ACM Conference on Electronic Commerce (Chicago, 8–12 July 2008). New York: ACM Press: 240–5Google Scholar
Yuan, W., Chen, Y., Wang, R., and Du, Z. 2007. Collective intelligence in knowledge management, in Xu, L., Tjoa, A. and Chaudhry, S. (eds.), Research and Practical Issues of Enterprise Information Systems II. Boston: Springer: vol. I: 651–5Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure [email protected] is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×