Buffington, JM, Montgomery, DR, Geomorphic classification of rivers. In Treatise on Geomorphology, Volume 9, Fluvial Geomorphology, ed. Shroder, J, Wohl, E (San Diego, CA: Academic Press, 2013), pp. 730–767.Google Scholar

Hungr, O, Evans, S, Bovis, MJ, Hutchinson, JN, A review of the classification of landslides of the flow type. Environmental and Engineering Geoscience, 7 (2001), 221–238.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Church, M, Steep headwater channels. In Treatise on Geomorphology, Volume 9, Fluvial Geomorphology, ed. Shroder, J, Wohl, E (San Diego, CA: Academic Press), pp. 528–549.Google Scholar

Rickenmann, D, McArdell, BW, Continuous measurement of sediment transport in the Erlenbach stream using piezoelectric bedload impact sensors. Earth Surface Processes and Landforms, 32 (2007), 1362–1378.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Lavigne, F, Suwa, H, Contrasts between debris flows, hyperconcentrated flows and stream flows at a channel of Mount Semeru, East Java. Geomorphology, 61 (2004), 41–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Pierson, TC, Hyperconcentrated flow-transitional process between water flow and debris flow. In Debris-flow Hazards and Related Phenomena, ed. Jakob, M, Hungr, O (Chichester: Springer Praxis Publishing, 2005), pp. 159–202.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Pierson, TC, Costa, JE, A rheologic classification of subaerial sediment–water flows. Geological Society of America, Reviews in Engineering Geology, 7 (1987), 1–12.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Marchi, L, D'Agostino, V, Estimation of debris-flow magnitude in the Eastern Italian Alps. Earth Surface Processes and Landforms, 29:2 (2004), 207–220.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Rickenmann, D, Koschni, A, Sediment loads due to fluvial transport and debris flows during the 2005 flood events in Switzerland. Hydrological Processes, 24 (2010), 993–1007.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Takahashi, T, Debris Flow (Rotterdam: Balkema, 1991).Google Scholar

Montgomery, DR, Buffington, JM, Channel-reach morphology in mountain drainage basins. Geological Society of America Bulletin, 109 (1997), 596–611.2.3.CO;2>CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Stock, J, Dietrich, WE, Valley incision by debris flows: evidence of a topographic signature. Water Resources Research, 39 (2003), 1089. doi: 10.1029/2001WR001057.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kirchner, JW, Finkel, RC, Riebe, CS, et al., Mountain erosion over 10 yr, 10 k.y., and 10 m.y. time scales. Geology, 29:7 (2001), 591–594.2.0.CO;2>CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Rickenmann, D, Empirical relationships for debris flows. Natural Hazards, 19 (1999), 47–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Jakob, M, Debris flow hazard analysis. In Debris-flow Hazards and Related Phenomena, ed. Jakob, M, Hungr, O (Chichester: Springer Praxis Publishing, 2005), pp. 411–443.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Jakob, M, A size classification for debris flows. Engineering Geology, 79 (2005), 151–161.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Harvey, AM, The coupling status of alluvial fans and debris cones: a review and synthesis. Earth Surface Processes and Landforms, 37 (2012), 64–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Petrascheck, A, Kienholz, H, Hazard assessment and mapping of mountain risks in Switzerland. In 3rd International Conference on Debris-Flow Hazards Mitigation, ed. Rickenmann, D, Chen, CL (Rotterdam: Millpress, 2003), pp. 25–38.Google Scholar

Greminger, P, Managing the risks of natural hazards. In 3rd International Conference on Debris-Flow Hazards Mitigation, ed. Rickenmann, D, Chen, CL (Rotterdam: Millpress, 2003), pp. 39–56.Google Scholar

Fell, R, Ho, KKS, Lacasse, S, Leroi, E, A framework for landslide risk assessment and management. In Landslide Risk Management, ed. Hungr, O, Fell, R (London: Taylor & Francis, 2005), pp. 3–25.Google Scholar

Porter, M, Morgenstern, N, Landslide Risk Evaluation. Canadian Technical Guidelines and Best Practices Related to Landslides. A National Initiative for Loss Reduction. Geological Survey of Canada, Open File 7312, 2013, doi:10.4095/292234.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Schneuwly-Bollschweiler, M, Corona, C, Stoffel, M, How to improve dating quality and reduce noise in tree-ring based debris-flow reconstructions. Quaternary Geochronology, 18 (2013), 110–118.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Chiverrell, R, Jakob, M, Radiocarbon dating: alluvial fan/debris cone evolution and hazards. In Dating Torrential Processes on Fans and Cones, ed. Schneuwly-Bollschweiler, M, Stoffel, M, Rudolf-Miklau, F. (New York: Springer, 2013), pp. 265–282.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Innes, JL, Lichenometric dating of debris-flow deposits in the Scottish Highlands. Earth Surface Processes and Landforms, 8 (2006), 579–588.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Griswold, JP, Iverson, RM, Mobility Statistics and Automated Hazard Mapping for Debris Flows and Rock Avalanches. U.S. Geological Survey, Scientific Investigations Report 2007–5276, 2008.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Scheidl, C, Rickenmann, D, Empirical prediction of debris-flow mobility and deposition on fans. Earth Surface Processes and Landforms, 35 (2010), 157–173.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hungr, O, Morgan, GC, Kellerhals, R, Quantitative analysis of debris torrent hazards for design of remedial measures. Canadian Geotechnical Journal, 21 (1984), 663–677.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kienholz, H, Frick, E, Gertsch, E, Assessment tools for mountain torrents: SEDEX© and bed load assessment matrix. In Proceedings of the International Interpraevent Symposium, Taipei, Taiwan (2010), pp. 245–256.Google Scholar

Jakob, M, Morphometric and geotechnical controls of debris flow frequency and magnitude in southwestern British Columbia. PhD thesis, University of British Columbia (1996).Google Scholar

Jakob, M, The fallacy of frequency: Statistical techniques for debris-flow frequency–magnitude analyses. In Proceedings of the 11th International Symposium on Landslides, Banff ISL, June 3–8, 2012.Google Scholar

IPCC, The Scientific Basis (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2014).Google Scholar

Jakob, M, Lambert, S, Climate change effects on landslides along the south-west coast of British Columbia. Geomorphology, 107 (2009), 275–284.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Stoffel, M, Mendlik, T, Schneuwly-Bollschweiler, M, Gobiet, A, Possible impacts of climate change on debris-flow activity in the Swiss Alps. Climate Change, 122 (2014), 141–155.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Zimmermann, M, Haeberli, W, Climatic change and debris flow activity in high-mountain areas: a case study in the Swiss Alps. Catena Supplement, 22 (1992), 59–72.Google Scholar

Huggel, C, Clague, JJ, Korup, O, Is climate change responsible for changing landslide activity in high mountains? Earth Surface Processes and Landforms, 37 (2012), 77–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Arenson, LU, Jakob, M, Periglacial geohazard risks and ground temperature increases. IAEG XII Congress – Engineering Geology for Society and Territory, Torino, Italy, September 15–19, 2014.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

D'Agostino, V, Lenzi, MA, Bedload transport in the instrumented watershed of the Rio Cordon: Part II. Analysis of the bedload rate. Catena, 36 (1999), 191–204.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Rickenmann, D, Comparison of bed load transport in torrents and gravel bed streams. Water Resources Research, 37 (2001), 3295–3305.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Comiti, F, Mao, L, Recent advances in the dynamics of steep channels. In Gravel-Bed Rivers: Processes, Tools, Environments, ed. Church, M, Biron, PM, Roy, AG. (Chichester: John Wiley & Sons, 2012), pp. 353–377.Google Scholar

Barry, JJ, Buffington, JM, King, JG, A general power equation for predicting bedload transport rates in gravel bed rivers. Water Resources Research, 40 (2004), doi:10.1029/2004WR003190.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Nitsche, M, Rickenmann, D, Turowski, JM, Badoux, A, Kirchner, JW, Evaluation of bedload transport predictions using flow resistance equations to account for macro-roughness in steep mountain streams. Water Resources Research, 47 (2011), W08513, doi:10.1029/2011WR010645.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Zimmermann, A, Flow resistance in steep streams: an experimental study. Water Resources Research, 46 (2010), doi:10.1029/2009WR007913.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hassan, MA, Church, M, Lisle, TE, Sediment transport and channel morphology of small, forested streams. Journal of the American Water Resources Association, 41 (2005), 853–876.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bathurst, JC, Effect of coarse surface layer on bed-load transport. Journal of Hydraulic Engineering, 133 (2007), 1192–1205.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Lamb, MP, Dietrich, WE, Venditti, JG, Is the critical Shields stress for incipient sediment motion dependent on channel-bed slope? Journal of Geophysical Research, 113 (2008), F02008, doi:10.1029/2007JF000831.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Yager, EM, Kirchner, JW, Dietrich, WE, Calculating bedload transport in steep, boulder-bed channels. Water Resources Research, 43 (2007), doi:10.1029/2006WR005432.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Palt, SM, Sedimenttransportprozesse im Himalaya-Karakorum und ihre Bedeutung für Wasserkraftanlagen. Institut für Wasserwirtschaft und Kulturtechnik, Universität Karlsruhe (TH), Mitteilungen 209 (2001) [in German].Google Scholar

Chiari, M, Friedl, K, Rickenmann, D, A one dimensional bedload transport model for steep slopes. Journal of Hydraulic Research, 48 (2010), 152–160.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Rickenmann, D, Recking, A, Evaluation of flow resistance equations using a large field data base. Water Resources Research, 47 (2011), W07538, doi:10.1029/2010WR009793.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Rickenmann, D, Alluvial steep channels: flow resistance, bedload transport and transition to debris flows. In Gravel-Bed Rivers: Processes, Tools, Environments, ed. Church, M, Biron, PM, Roy, AG. (Chichester: John Wiley & Sons, 2012), pp. 386–397.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Oden, ME, Debris recharge rates in torrented gullies on the Queen Charlotte Islands. MSc thesis, University of British Columbia (1994).Google Scholar

Jakob, M, Bovis, M, Oden, M, The significance of channel recharge rates for estimating debris-flow magnitude and frequency. Earth Surface Processes and Landforms, 30 (2005), 755–766.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Mueller, ER, Pitlick, J, Sediment supply and channel morphology in mountain river systems: 1. Relative importance of lithology, topography, and climate. Journal of Geophysical Research Earth Surfaces, 118 (2013), doi:10.1002/2013JF002843.Google Scholar

Recking, A, Influence of sediment supply on mountain streams bedload transport. Geomorphology, 175–176 (2012), 139–150.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Wilford, DJ, Sakals, ME, Innes, JL, Sidle, RC, Bergerud, WA, Recognition of debris flow, debris flood and flood hazard through watershed morphometrics. Landslides, 1 (2004), 61–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Costa, JE, Rheologic, geomorphic, and sedimentologic differentiation of water floods, hyperconcentrated flows, and debris flows. In Flood Geomorphology, ed. Baker, VR, Kochel, RC, Patton, PC (New York: John Wiley & Sons, 1988), pp. 113–122.Google Scholar

Korup, O, Landslides in the fluvial system. In Treatise on Geomorphology, Volume 9, Fluvial Geomorphology, ed. Shroder, J, Wohl, E (San Diego, CA: Academic Press, 2013), pp. 244–259.Google Scholar

Zimmermann, M, Mani, P, Romang, H, Magnitude–frequency aspects of Alpine debris flows. Eclogae Geologicae Helvetiae, 90 (1997), 415–420.Google Scholar

Stoffel, M, Bollschweiler, M, Tree-ring analysis in natural hazards research: an overview. Natural Hazards and Earth Systems Science, 8 (2008), 187–202.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Rickenmann, D, Laigle, D, McArdell, BW, Hübl, J, Comparison of 2D debris-flow simulation models with field events. Computational Geosciences, 10 (2006), 241–264.CrossRefGoogle Scholar