Achterberg, C. L., Novak, J. D., and Gillespie, A. H. 1985. “Theory-Driven Research as a Means to Improve Nutrition Education.” Journal of Nutrition Education, 17(5), 179–184.Google Scholar

Al-Kunifed, A., and Wandersee, J. H. 1990. “One Hundred References Related to Concept Mapping.” Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 27(10), 1069–1075.Google Scholar

Anderson, J. R. 1983. The Architecture of Cognition. Cambridge, MA: Harvard.Google Scholar

Ausubel, David P. 1962. “A Subsumption Theory of Meaningful Verbal Learning and Retention.” Journal of General Psychology, 66, 213–224.Google Scholar

Ausubel, David P. 1963. The Psychology of Meaningful Verbal Learning. New York: Grune and Stratton.Google Scholar

Ausubel, David P. 1968. Educational Psychology: A Cognitive View. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.Google Scholar

Ausubel, David P. 2000. The Assimilation and Retention of Knowledge: A Cognitive View. Dordrecht/Boston/London: Kluwer Academic Publishers.Google Scholar

Ausubel, David P., Novak, Joseph D., and Hanesian, Helen. 1978. Educational Psychology: A Cognitive View, 2nd ed. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston. Reprinted, 1986, New York: Werbel & Peck.Google Scholar

Bartlet, Frederick C. 1932. Remembering. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Belluck, P. “To Really Learn, Quit Studying and Take a Test.” New York Times. Jan. 20, 2011, www.nytimes.com/2011/01/21/science/21memory.html.Google Scholar

Bowen, B. L. 1972. “A Proposed Theoretical Model Using the Work of Thomas Kuhn, David Ausubel and Mauritz Johnson as a Basis for Curriculum and Instruction Decisions in Science Education.” Unpublished doctoral thesis, Cornell University.Google Scholar

Bretz, S. 1994. “Learning Strategies and Their Influence Upon Students’ Conceptions of Science Literacy and Meaningful Learning: The Case of a College Chemistry Course for Non-Science Majors.” Unpublished doctoral thesis, Cornell University.Google Scholar

Bretz, S. L. and Meinwald, J. 2001. “The Language of Chemistry.” Journal of College Science Teaching, 21, 220–224.Google Scholar

Brewer, A., Helfgott, M. A., Novak, J. D., and Schanhals, R. 2012. “An Application of Cmaps in the Description of Clinical Information Structure and Logic.” Global Advances in Health and Medicine.Google Scholar

Cañas, Alberto J., Ford, Kenneth M., Novak, Joseph D., Hayes, Patrick, Reichherzer, Thomas R., and Suri, Niranjan. 2001. “Online Concept Maps: Enhancing Collaborative Learning by Using Technology with Concept Maps.” The Science Teacher, 68(4), 49–51.Google Scholar

Cañas, A. J., and Novak, J. D. 2008. “Concept Mapping using CmapTools to Enhance Meaningful Learning.” In Osaka, A., Shum, S. B., and Sherborne, T. (eds.), Knowledge Cartography: Software Tools and Mapping Techniques (pp. 25–46). London: Springer.Google Scholar

Carbonero, M. A., Carbonero, L. J., Lourdes Otero, M.-A., and Monsalvo, E. 2017. “Program to Promote Personal and Social Responsibility in the Secondary Classroom.” Frontiers in Psychology, 8, 809. Published online May 22. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2017.00809.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Chi, M. T. H., and Koeske, R. 1983. “Network Representation of a Child’s Dinosaur Knowledge.” Developmental Psychology, 19, 1, 29–39.Google Scholar

Collins, B., and Nyenhuis, R. 2020a. “The Effectiveness of Concept Maps for Students’ Learning and Retention.” Journal of Political Science Education. DOI: 10.1080/15512169.2020.1775090.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Collins, B., and Nyenhuis, R. 2020b. “Active Learning in Political Science.” In Mintzes, Joel J. and Walter (eds.), Emily M., Active Learning in College Science: The Case for Evidence-Based Practice (pp. 3–12). New York: Springer.Google Scholar

Conant, J. B. 1947. On Understanding Science: An Historical Approach. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar

Crabtree, G. 2019. “The Coming Electric Vehicle Transformation.” Science, 366(6464), 422–424.Google Scholar

Daley, B. J., During, S. J., Torre, D. M. 2016. “Using Concept Maps to Create Meaningful Learning in Medical Education.” MedEdPublish. www.mededpublish.org/manuscripts/380/.Google Scholar

Daley, B. J., Morgan, S., and Black, S. B., 2016. “Concept Maps in Nursing Education: A Historical Literature Review and Research Directions.” Journal of Nursing Education, 66(11), 611–639. Also at: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/27783817/.Google Scholar

Darwin, C. 1873. The Origin of Species by Means of Natural Selection. New York: Hurst and Company.Google Scholar

Donaldson, M. C. 1978. Children’s Minds. New York: Norton.Google Scholar

Dunn, B. R., Novak, J. D., Hill, R., MacQueen, K., and Wagner, L. 1989. “The Measurement of Knowledge Integration using EEG Frequency Analysis.” Paper presented at the 1989 annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, San Francisco, California.Google Scholar

Edmondson, K. M. 2004. “Assessing Science Understanding through Concept Maps.” In Mintzes, J. J., Wandersee, J. H., and Novak, J. D. (eds.), Assessing Science Understanding: A Human Constructivist View (pp. 15–40). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.Google Scholar

Edmondson, K. M., and Novak, J. D. 1993. “The Interplay of Scientific Epistemological Views, Learning Strategies, and Attitudes of College Students.” Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 32(6), 547–559.Google Scholar

Flat Earth Believers: “Modern Flat Earth Beliefs.” https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Modern_flat_Earth_societies.Google Scholar

Ford, K. M., Canas, A. J., Jones, J. C., Stahl, H., Novak, J. D., and Adams-Webber, J. 1991. “ICONKAT: An Integrated Constructivist Knowledge Acquisition Tool.” Knowledge Acquisition, 3, 215–236.Google Scholar

Fraser, K. 1993. “Theory Based Use of Concept Mapping in Organizational Development: Creating Shared Understanding as a Basis for the Cooperative Design of Work Changes and Changes in Working Relationships.” Ph.D. Dissertation, Cornell University.Google Scholar

Fraser, Kym, and Novak, Joseph D. 1998. “Managing the Empowerment of Employees to Address Issues of Inter-Employee Cooperation, Communication, and Work Redesign.” The Learning Organization, 5(2), 109–119.Google Scholar

Freeman, S., Eddya, Sarah L., McDonough, M., Smith, Michelle K., Okoroafor, N., Jordt, H., and Wenderoth, Mary P. 2014. “Active Learning Increases Student Performance in Science, Engineering, and Mathematics.” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the USA, 111(23), 8410–8415. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1319030111.Google Scholar

Frisendal, Thomas, 2012. “Design Thinking Business Analysis: Business Concept Mapping Applied (Management for Professionals),” New York, Springer. Frisendal.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Frisendal, Thomas. 2016. Graph Data Modeling for NoSQL and SQL: Visualize Structure and Meaning. Basking Ridge, NJ: Technics Publications.Google Scholar

Gurley-Dilger, L. I. 1982. “Use of Gowin’s Vee and Concept Mapping Strategies to Teach Responsibility for Learning in High School Biological Sciences.” Unpublished Ph.D. thesis, Cornell University.Google Scholar

Gurley, L. 2014. Concept Mapping: Learning How to Make Them, Use Them, and Teach Them to Others. Self-published book.Google Scholar

Hagerman, Howard. 1966. “An Analysis of Learning and Retention in College Students and the Common Goldfish (Carassius auratus, Lin).” Ph.D. thesis, Purdue University.Google Scholar

Heinze-Fry, Jane A., and Novak, Joseph D. 1990. “Concept Mapping Brings Long-Term Movement Toward Meaningful Learning.” Science Education, 74(4), 461–472.Google Scholar

Helm, Hugh, and Novak, Joseph D. (eds.) 1983. Proceedings of the International Seminar on Misconceptions in Science and Mathematics Conference, June 1983. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University, Department of Education.Google Scholar

Hibbard, K. M., and Novak, J. D. 1975. “Audio-Tutorial Elementary School Science Instruction as a Method for Studying of Children’s Concept Learning: Particular Nature of Matter.” Science Education, 59(4), 559–570.Google Scholar

Hilgard, E. R. 1948. Theories of Learning. New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts.Google Scholar

Hoffman, B. 1962. The Tyranny of Testing. New York: Crowell-Collier Press.Google Scholar

Hoffman, R. R., Coffey, J. W., Ford, K. M., and Carnot, M. J. 2001. “STORM-LK: A Human-Centered Knowledge Model for Weather Forecasting.” In Proceedings of the 45th Annual Meeting of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society. Santa Monica, CA: HFES.Google Scholar

Hoffman, R. R., Coffey, J. W., Ford, K. M. and Novak, J. D. 2006. “A Method for Eliciting, Preserving, and Sharing the Knowledge of Forecasters.” Weather and Forecasting, 21, 416–428.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Johnson, Mauritz Jr. 1967. “Definitions and Models in Curriculum Theory.” Educational Theory, 17(2), 127–140.Google Scholar

Karpicke, J. D., and Blunt, J. R. 2011. “Retrieval Practice Produces More Learning Than Elaborative Studying with Concept Mapping.” Science, 331(6018), 772–775. doi:10.1126/science.1199327.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Kohlberg, L. 1984. Essays on Moral Development, Vol. II: The Psychology of Moral Development: The Nature and Validity of Moral Stages. San Francisco: Harper & Row.Google Scholar

Kuhn, David J. 1967. “A Study of Varying Modes of Topical Presentation in Elementary College Biology to Determine the Effect of Advance Organizers in Knowledge.” Ph.D. thesis, Purdue University.Google Scholar

Kuhn, D. 2000. “Metacognitive Development.” Current Developments in Cognitive Science, 9, 178–181.Google Scholar

Kuhn, T. S. 1962. The Structure of Scientific Revolutions. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar

Kulik, James A., Kulik, Chen-Lin C., and Cohen, Peter A. 1979. “Research on Audio-Tutorial Instruction: A Meta-Analysis of Comparative Studies.” Research in Higher, Education, 11(4), 321–341. http://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/43586.Google Scholar

Leupen, Sarah. 2020. “Team-Based Learning in STEM and the Health Sciences.” In Mintzes, Joel J. and Walter, Emily M. Active Learning in College Science. The Case for Evidence-Based Practice (pp. 219–232). New York: Springer.Google Scholar

Macnamara, John. 1982. Names for Things: A Study of Human Learning. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar

Mali, Ganesh B. (1979). Development of Earth and Gravity Concepts among Nepali Children, Science Education, 63(5), 685–691.Google Scholar

Marton, Ference and Söljö, R. 1976a. “On Qualitative Differences in Learning, 1: Outcome and Process.” British Journal of Education Psychology, 46, 4–11.Google Scholar

Marton, Ference and Söljö, R. 1976b. “On Qualitative Differences in Learning, 2: Outcomes as a Function of Learners Conception of the Task.” British Journal of Educational Psychology, 46, 115–127.Google Scholar

Mintzes, J. J., Cañas, A., Coffey, J., Gorman, J., Gurley, L. Hoffman, et al. 2011. “Comment on ‘Retrieval Practice Produces More Learning than Elaborative Studying with Concept Mapping.’” Science 334(6055), reply 453.Google Scholar

Mintzes, Joel J., and Walter, Emily M., 2020. Active Learning in College Science: The Case for Evidence-Based Practice. New York: Springer.Google Scholar

Mintzes, J. J., Wandersee, J. H., and Novak, J. D. (eds.) 2004. Assessing Science Understanding: A Human Constructivist View. San Diego, CA: Academic Press.Google Scholar

Mintzes, J. J., Wandersee, J. H., and Novak, J. D. (eds.) 2005. Teaching Science for Understanding: A Human Constructivist View. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar

Misconceptions in Science and Mathematics: 1983–1995. The Proceedings of these conferences can be obtained at: www.mlrg.org.Google Scholar

Moon, B. M., Hoffman, R. R., Novak, J. D., and Cañas, J. J. 2011. Applied Concept Mapping: Capturing, Analyzing, and Organizing Knowledge. New York: CRC Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Molnar, Alex. 1994. “Education for Profit: A Yellow Brick Road to Nowhere.” Educational Leadership, 52(1), 66–71.Google Scholar

Nasser, Darian. 2018. “Using Concept Mapping through Problem-Based Learning to Facilitate Lifelong Knowledge of Risk Factors for Cardiovascular Diseases: Case University of Algiers.” Paper presented at the PBL 2018 International Conference, PBL for the Next Generation: Blending Active Learning, Technology and Social Justice, Santa Clara, California, Feb. 16–19.Google Scholar

National Academy of Sciences National Research Council. 1999. How People Learn: Bridging Research and Practice. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. https://doi.org/10.17226/9457.Google Scholar

National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2018. How People Learn II: Learners, Contexts, and Cultures. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. https://doi.org/10.17226/24783.Google Scholar

National Research Council (NRC). 1996. National Science Education Standards. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.Google Scholar

Neisser, Ulric. 1967. Cognitive Psychology. New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts.Google Scholar

Nesbit, J. C. Nesbit, and Olusola, O. A. 2006. “Learning with Concept and Knowledge Maps: A Meta-Analysis.” Review of Educational Research, 76(3), 413–448.Google Scholar

Nonaka, I., and Takeuchi, H. 1995. The Knowledge-Creating Company. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Novak, J. D. 1958. “An Experimental Comparison of a Conventional and a Project Centered Method of Teaching a College General Botany Course.” Journal of Experimental Education, 26, 217–223.Google Scholar

Novak, J. D. 1961. “An Approach to the Interpretation and Measurement of Problem-Solving Ability.” Science Education, 45, 122–131.Google Scholar

Novak, J. D. 1963. What should we teach in biology? NABT News and Views, 7(2), 1. Repr. in Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 1(3), 241–243.Google Scholar

Novak, J. D. 1964. “Importance of Conceptual Schemes for Science Teaching.” The Science Teacher, 31(6), 10.Google Scholar

Novak, J. D. 1971. “A Study of Cognitive Subsumption in the Life Sciences.” Science Education, 55(3), 309–320.Google Scholar

Novak, J. D. 1972a. “Facilities for Secondary School Science Teaching.” The Science Teacher, 39(3), 2–13.Google Scholar

Novak, J. D. 1972b. Facilities for Secondary Science Teaching: Evolving Patterns in Facilities and Programs. Washington, DC: National Science Teachers Association.Google Scholar

Novak, J. D. 1973. “Evolving Patterns in Secondary School Science Facilities.” The American Biology Teacher, 35(6), 319–321.Google Scholar

Novak, J. D. 1977a. A Theory of Education. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press; paperback, 1986. Spanish, Madrid: Alianza Editorial; Portuguese, Lisboa: Platano; Basque, 1996, Zarautz (Gipuzkoa).Google Scholar

Novak, J. D. 1977b. “An Alternative to Piagetian Psychology for Science and Mathematics Education.” Science Education, 61(4), 453–477.Google Scholar

Novak, J. D. 1983. “Human Constructivism: A Unification of Psychological and Epistemological Phenomena in Meaning Making.” International Journal of Personal Construct Psychology, 6, 167–193.Google Scholar

Novak, J. D. 1993. “Human Constructivism: A Unification of Psychological and Epistemological Phenomena in Meaning Making.” International Journal of Personal Construct Psychology, 6, 167–193.Google Scholar

Novak, J. D. 1998. Learning, Creating, and Using Knowledge: Concept Maps as Facilitative Tools in Schools and Corporations. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum & Associates. Spanish, 1998, Madrid: Alianza Editorial. Portuguese, 2000, Lisboa: Platano Edicoes Tecnicas. Italian, 2001, Trento: Edizioni Erickson. Finnish, 2003, Jyuvaskyla, Finland: PS-kustannus.Google Scholar

Novak, J. D. 2002a. “Meaningful Learning: The Essential Factor for Conceptual Change in Limited or Appropriate Propositional Hierarchies (LIPHs) Leading to Empowerment of Learners.” Science Education, 86(4), 548–571.Google Scholar

Novak, J. D. 2002b. “Using Concept Maps to Facilitate Classroom and Distance Learning.” Scuola & Citta, 2, 112–114.Google Scholar

Novak, J. D. (2003). A Preliminary Statement on Research in Science Education. Journal of Research and Science Teaching, 40(1), pS1–S7.Google Scholar

Novak, J. D. 2004. “Reflections on a Half Century of Thinking in Science Education and Research: Implications from a Twelve-Year Longitudinal Study of Children’s Learning.” Canadian Journal of Science, Mathematics, and Technology Education, 4(1), 23–41.Google Scholar

Novak, J. D. 2010. Learning, Creating, and Using Knowledge: Concept Maps as Facilitative Tools in Schools and Corporations, 2nd ed. New York: Routledge, Taylor-Francis. Italian translation: Erickson, 2012.Google Scholar

Novak, J. D. 2011. “A Theory of Education: Meaningful Learning Underlies the Constructive Integration of Thinking, Feeling, and Acting Leading to Empowerment for Commitment and Responsibility.” Aprendizagem Significativa em Revista / Meaningful Learning Review, 1(2), 1–14.Google Scholar

Novak, J. D., and Cañas, A. J. 2004. “Building on New Constructivist Ideas and the CMapTools to Create New Model for Education.” Closing Lecture. First International Conference on Concept Mapping: Theory, Methodology, Technology. Pamplona, Spain. University of Navarra.Google Scholar

Novak, J. D., and Cañas, A. J. 2006. “The Origins of the Concept Mapping Tool and the Continuing Evolution of the Tool.” Information Visualization Journal, 5(3), 175.Google Scholar

Novak, J. D., and Cañas, A. J. 2007. “Theoretical Origins of Concept Maps: How to Construct Them and Uses in Education.” Reflecting Education, 3(1), 29–42. www.reflectingeducation.net/index.php/reflecting.Google Scholar

Novak, J. D., and Gowin, D. B. 1984. Learning How to Learn. New York and Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. (Also published in eight other languages.)Google Scholar

Novak, J. D., and Iuli, R. I. 1995. “Meaningful Learning as the Foundation for Constructivist Epistemology.” In Finley, F, Allchin, D, Rhees, D, and Fifield, S (eds.), Proceedings of the Third International History, Philosophy and Science Teaching Conference, Vol. II. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota.Google Scholar

Novak, J. D., and Musonda, D. 1991. “A Twelve-Year Longitudinal Study of Science Concept Learning.” American Educational Research Journal, 28(1), 117–153.Google Scholar

Novak, J. D., Meister, M., Knox, W. W., and Sullivan, D. W. 1966. The World of Science Series. Books One to Six. Indianapolis, IN: Bobbs‐Merrill Company, Inc.Google Scholar

Novak, Joseph D., Ring, Donald G., and Tamir, Pinchas. 1971. “Interpretation of Research Findings in Terms of Ausubel’s Theory and Implications for Science Education.” Science Education, 55(4), 438–526.Google Scholar

Novak, J. D., and Symington, David. 1982. “Concept Mapping for Curriculum Development.” V.I.E.R. (The Victorian Institute of Educational Research), 48, 3–11.Google Scholar

Nussbaum, J., and Novak, J. D. 1976. “An Assessment of Children’s Concepts of Earth Utilizing Structured Interviews.” Science Education, 60(4), 535–550.Google Scholar

Palmer, Cristi. 1996. “In Vitro and In Vivo Effects of Bicarbonate on Botrytus Cinceria.” Unpublished Ph.D. thesis, Cornell University.Google Scholar

Popper, K. R. 1959. The Logic of Scientific Discovery. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar

Popper, K. R. 1982. Un-ended Quest: An Intellectual Autobiography. London: Open Court.Google Scholar

Postlethwait, S. N., Novak, J. D., and Murray, H. T. Jr. 1969. The Audio-Tutorial Approach to Learning through Independent Study and Integrated Experience, 2nd ed. Minneapolis, MN: Burgess.Google Scholar

Postlethwait, S. N., Novak, Joseph D., and Murray, H. T. Jr. 1972. The Audio-Tutorial Approach to Learning, 3rd ed. Minneapolis, MN: Burgess.Google Scholar

Ravitch, D. 2010. The Death and Life of the Great American School System. n.p.: Capitol Reader and Shamrock New Media.Google Scholar

Rowe, Mary B. 1974. “Wait-Time and Rewards as Instructional Variables: Their Influence on Learning, Logic, and Fate Control. I. Wait-time.” Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 2(2), 81–94.Google Scholar

Schneps, M., and Sadler, P. (1989). Private Universe Project. Cambridge, MA: Harvard-Smithsonian Center for Astrophysics, Science 6–8, 9–12.Google Scholar

Schwab, J. J. 1973. “The Practical 3: Translation into Curriculum.” School Review, 81(4), 501–522.Google Scholar

Senge, P. M. 1990. The Fifth Discipline: The Art and Practice of the Learning Organization. New York: Doubleday.Google Scholar

Silesky, O. 2008. “Concept Maps and Standardized Tests.” PowerPoint presentation, Sept. 23, Tallinn, Estonia.Google Scholar

Skinner, B. F. 1938. The Behavior of Organisms: An Experimental Analysis. New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts.Google Scholar

Symington, D., and Novak, J. D. 1982. “Teaching Children How to Learn.” The Educational Magazine 39(5), 13–16 (Australian).Google Scholar

Torre, D., Daley, Barbara J., Picho, K., and Durning, Steven J. 2017. “Group Concept Mapping: An Approach to Explore Group Knowledge Organization and Collaborative Learning in Senior Medical Students.” Medical Teacher 39(10), 1051–1056. doi: 10.1080/0142159X.2017.1342030.Google Scholar

Toulmin, S. 1972. Human Understanding. Vol. I: The Collective Use and Evolution. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Tyler, R. W. 1977. “Foreword.” Novak, In J. D., A Theory of Education (pp. 7–8). Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar

Underwood, Emily, 2015. “Expanding our Mental Maps.” Science, 352, 1378.Google Scholar

von Glasersfeld, E. 1984. “An Introduction to Radical Constructivism.” In Watzlanick, P. (ed.), The Invented Reality (pp. 17–40). New York: Norton.Google Scholar

Vygotsky, L. S. 1962. Thought and Language (trans. and ed. Hanfmann, Eugenia and Vakar, Gertrude). Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar

Vygotsky, L. S. 1986. Thought and Language (trans. and ed. Alex, Kozulin). Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar

Waterman, Robert H. 1995. What America Does Right. New York: Penguin, Plume.Google Scholar

Watson, J. D. 1968. The Double Helix: A Personal Account of the Discovery of the Structure of DNA. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar

Whorf, B. L. 1956. Language, Thought and Reality: Selected Writings of Benjamin Lee Whorf (ed. and with an introduction by Carroll, John B). Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar