Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-vdxz6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-29T09:16:34.913Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Chapter 12 - Female Sterilization

from Section 2 - Methods of Contraception

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  25 March 2022

Johannes Bitzer
Affiliation:
University Women’s Hospital, Basel
Tahir A. Mahmood
Affiliation:
Victoria Hospital, Kirkcaldy
Get access

Summary

The different methods of female sterilization are described with their efficacy, indications, contraindications and complications

Type
Chapter
Information
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2022

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Further Reading

United Nations. Levels and Trends of Contraceptive Use as Assessed in 1988. New York: United Nations, 1992.Google Scholar
Ubeda, A, Labastida, R, Dexeus, S. Essure: a new device for hysteroscopic tubal sterilization in an outpatient setting. Fertil Steril 2004;82:196–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bhiwandiwala, PP, Mumford, SD, Feldblum, PJ. A comparison of different laparoscopic sterilization occlusion techniques in 24,439 procedures. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1982;144:319.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Davies, GC, Letchworth, AT Diamond, I. A comparison of Filshie and Hulka-Clemens clips used in sterilisation operation. J Obstet Gynecol 1990;10:251.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hulka, JF. Methods of female sterilization. In Nichols, DH (Ed): Gynecologic and Obstetric Surgery. St. Louis: Mosby, 1993.Google Scholar
Westburg, J, Scott, F, Creinin, F. Safety outcomes of female sterilization by salpingectomy and tubal occlusion. Contraception 2017;95:505–8.Google Scholar
Curtis, K, Mohllajee, A, Peterson, H. Regret following female sterilization at a young age: a systematic review. Contraception 2006;73:205–10.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cibula, D, Widschwendter, M, Majek, O, et al. Tubal ligation and the risk of ovarian cancer: review and meta-analysis. Hum Reprod Update 2011;17:5567.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure [email protected] is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×