Book contents
- Frontmatter
- Contents
- List of maps
- List of tables
- Preface
- Acknowledgements
- List of abbreviations
- 1 European Russia in 1914 showing the location of major enterprises
- 2 Urals state ironworks in 1914
- 3 St Petersburg in 1914 showing the location of major shipyards and armaments factories
- Introduction
- Part I Defence imperatives and Russian industry, 1911–1907
- Part II Rearmament and industrial ambition
- 3 The defence burden, 1907–1914
- 4 The economics and politics of industrial recovery
- 5 The armaments industry: the search for identity and influence, 1908–1914
- 6 The economics and politics of defence procurement
- 7 Military preparedness on the eve of the First World War
- Conclusion
- Notes
- Bibliography
- Index
- Cambridge Russian, Soviet and Post-Soviet Studies
5 - The armaments industry: the search for identity and influence, 1908–1914
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 07 May 2010
- Frontmatter
- Contents
- List of maps
- List of tables
- Preface
- Acknowledgements
- List of abbreviations
- 1 European Russia in 1914 showing the location of major enterprises
- 2 Urals state ironworks in 1914
- 3 St Petersburg in 1914 showing the location of major shipyards and armaments factories
- Introduction
- Part I Defence imperatives and Russian industry, 1911–1907
- Part II Rearmament and industrial ambition
- 3 The defence burden, 1907–1914
- 4 The economics and politics of industrial recovery
- 5 The armaments industry: the search for identity and influence, 1908–1914
- 6 The economics and politics of defence procurement
- 7 Military preparedness on the eve of the First World War
- Conclusion
- Notes
- Bibliography
- Index
- Cambridge Russian, Soviet and Post-Soviet Studies
Summary
Introduction: the organization and reorganization of the armaments industry
The specific characteristics of defence industry, tsarist ideology and Russian economic backwardness impart a multiple fascination to the study of the armaments industry. Like any sovereign state, the tsarist regime had no choice but to concern itself with matters relating to the output of defence goods. These it preferred to entrust to government-owned arsenals, shipyards and ironworks. To leave the production of military goods to the commercial sector exposed the government to the whim of the entrepreneur, whose prime concern was with the survival of his business. If entrepreneurs colluded, then the government, being their sole customer, would be unable to enforce competition in the arms trade. In practice, the tsarist regime rarely needed to confront these issues prior to 1905. Whether the government could or should close off for good the opportunities for the private sector remained an intermittently articulated question of principle that was ultimately decided by the practical needs of rearmament.
Few entrepreneurs were brave or foolish enough to enter the ‘arms bazaar’. The risks of entering this peculiar market required little emphasis. In the uncertain world of defence production, it made little sense to invest heavily in new plant or to recruit skilled workers, only to find that the government cut off their life-blood, whether by withdrawing orders altogether, by privileging the state sector or by importing arms.
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- Government, Industry and Rearmament in Russia, 1900–1914The Last Argument of Tsarism, pp. 197 - 259Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 1994