Book contents
- Frontmatter
- Contents
- List of figures
- List of tables
- Notes on Contributors
- Preface
- List of abbreviations
- 1 Introduction
- PART I Setting the stage
- PART II Boundaries
- 4 Internal measures in the multilateral trading system: where are the borders of the WTO agenda?
- 5 Legitimising global economic governance through transnational parliamentarisation: how far have we come? How much further must we go?
- PART III Emerging and established powers
- PART IV Weaker actors
- PART V The consensus principle
- PART VI Quo vadis?
- Index
- References
4 - Internal measures in the multilateral trading system: where are the borders of the WTO agenda?
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 07 September 2011
Book contents
- Frontmatter
- Contents
- List of figures
- List of tables
- Notes on Contributors
- Preface
- List of abbreviations
- 1 Introduction
- PART I Setting the stage
- PART II Boundaries
- 4 Internal measures in the multilateral trading system: where are the borders of the WTO agenda?
- 5 Legitimising global economic governance through transnational parliamentarisation: how far have we come? How much further must we go?
- PART III Emerging and established powers
- PART IV Weaker actors
- PART V The consensus principle
- PART VI Quo vadis?
- Index
- References
Summary
Introduction
A core issue for the multilateral trading system over the years has been the reach of its competence. Of all the sources of tension that have confronted the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade/World Trade Organization (GATT/WTO) system over the years, this is probably the greatest. Effective international cooperation requires a shared view on the content and purpose of the trading system. Yet agreement has often proved elusive and negotiated outcomes have occasionally been challenged by governments even though they have subscribed to them. The debate in the late 1970s and 1980s about whether trade in services had a place in GATT, for example, has been followed by similar discussions on intellectual property rights (IPRs), labour rights, the environment, investment and competition. Differing views on these matters have often influenced the pace of progress in rounds of multilateral trade negotiations.
At first sight, the WTO's mandate seems to be well defined: it is an organisation that deals with the rules of trade between its members. Why is it then that WTO Agreements deal with internal measures and why has the question of how the WTO deals with internal measures become so contentious? The most straightforward answer to the first question is probably that most internal measures have an effect on trade flows. As a result, a body that provides rules on trade flows can be expected to have to take a stance with respect to internal measures.
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- Governing the World Trade OrganizationPast, Present and Beyond Doha, pp. 49 - 81Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2011
References
1999. ‘Eco-labelling and the World Trade Organization’, in and (eds.), Trade, Environment and the Millennium. New York: UN Press.Google Scholar
2004. ‘The multilateral consensus and the World Trade Organization’, Journal of World Trade 38(5): 855–76.Google Scholar
, , and 2001. ‘Trade and environment: bargaining outcomes from linked negotiations’, Review of International Economics 9(3): 414–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
2000. ‘Regulatory protectionism, developing nations and a two-tier world trade system’, CEPR Discussion Paper No. 2574.
2006. ‘The case for a multilateral agreement on competition policy: a developing country perspective’, Journal of International Economic Law 9(2): 293–323.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
and 2005. ‘Competing ways towards international antitrust: the WTO versus the ICN’, Marburg Papers on Economics No. 3.
and 1985. ‘Export subsidies and international market share rivalry’, Journal of International Economics 18(1/2): 83–100.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
and 2002. ‘Issue linkage and issue tie-in in multilateral negotiations’, Journal of International Economics 57(2): 423–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
1990. ‘Strategic interaction among nations: negotiable and non-negotiable trade barriers’, Canadian Journal of Economics 23(1): 84–108.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
and 2003. Trade and the Environment: Theory and Evidence. Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, and 2001. ‘International cartel enforcement: lessons from the 1990s’, The World Economy 24(9): 1221–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
and the 2003. The Singapore Issues and the World Trading System: the Road to Cancun and Beyond. Bern: SECO.Google Scholar
and 2009. ‘Services provisions in regional trade agreements: stumbling or building blocks for multilateral liberalisation?’, in and (eds.), Multilateralizing Regionalism. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
and (2009). The Political Economy of the World Trading System, 3rd edn, Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
and 2003. ‘Trading market access for competition policy enforcement’, CEPR Discussion Paper No. 4110.
2002. ‘From politics to technocracy – and back again: the fate of the multilateral trading regime’, American Journal of International Law 96(1): 94–117.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
2007. ‘Transportation costs and international trade in the second era of globalization’, Journal of Economic Perspectives 21(3): 131–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
1994. ‘The social dimensions of the liberalization of world trade’, Paper presented at the Working Party on the Social Dimensions of Globalization, International Labour Organization, Geneva, GB.261/WP/SLD/1.
and 2009. ‘Risk assessment in the international food safety arena: can the multilateral institutions encourage unbiased outcomes?’, Geneva: World Trade Organization, WTO Staff Working Paper ERSD-2009–01.
, , and 1995. ‘Environmental regulation and the competitiveness of U.S. manufacturing: what does the evidence tell us?’ Journal of Economic Literature 33(1): 132–63.Google Scholar
2010. ‘Developing countries, standards and the WTO’, Journal of International Trade and Economic Development 19(1): 163–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
and 2006. ‘Trade union rights, democracy, and exports: a gravity model approach’, Review of International Economics 14(5): 859–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
1993. Trading Free. The GATT and US Trade Policy. New York: Twentieth Century Fund Press.Google Scholar
2008. ‘Trade and labour’, in , , and (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of International Trade Law. Oxford University Press, pp. 539–70.Google Scholar
and 1995. ‘How trade-related are intellectual property rights?’, Journal of International Economics 39(3–4): 227–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
and 1997. ‘Patents and international trade: an empirical study’, in , , and (eds.), Quiet Pioneering: the International Economic Legacy of Robert M. Stern. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press, pp. 95–120.Google Scholar
2003. ‘The impact of trade on intra-industry reallocation and aggregate industry productivity’, Econometrica 71(6): 1695–725.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
1998. Knowledge Diplomacy: Global Competition and the Politics of Intellectual Property. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press.Google Scholar
1995. ‘Trade liberalization and the harmonization of social policies: lessons from European integration’, in and (eds.), Fair Trade and Harmonization: Prerequisites for Free Trade?, vol. I Economic Analysis. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
and 1998. ‘The SPS Agreement of the World Trade Organization and international organizations: the roles of the Codex Alimentarius Commission, the International Plant Convention, and the International Office for Epizootics’, Syracuse Journal of International Law and Commerce 26: 27–54.Google Scholar
2006. ‘Product standards, trade disputes and protectionism’, Canadian Journal of Economics 39(2): 564–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
1998. ‘Labour standards and trade flows of OECD countries’, World Economy 21(1): 57–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
2005. World Trade Report 2005: Trade, Standards and the WTO. Geneva: World Trade Organization.Google Scholar
2007. World Trade Report 2007: Six Decades of Multilateral Trade Cooperation: What Have we Learnt?Geneva: World Trade Organization.Google Scholar
- 3
- Cited by